Upload
lytruc
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ANALYSIS OF DISPERSION COMPENSATION
TECHNIQUES AND FIBER NON-LINEAR
EFFECTS IN DWDM
OPTICAL NETWORKS
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
SATHYA V
Register No: 14MCO021
in partial fulfillment for the requirement of award of the degree
of
MASTER OF ENGINEERING
in
COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
KUMARAGURU COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
(An autonomous institution affiliated to Anna University, Chennai)
COIMBATORE-641049
ANNA UNIVERSITY: CHENNAI 600 025
APRIL 2016
ii
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
Certified that this project report titled “ANALYSIS OF DISPERSION
COMPENSATION TECHNIQUES AND FIBER NON-LINEAR EFFECTS IN
DWDM OPTICAL NETWORKS” is the bonafide work of SATHYA.V [Reg. No.
14MCO021] who carried out the research under my supervision. Certified further that, to
the best of my knowledge the work reported herein does not form part of any other project
or dissertation on the basis of which a degree or award was conferred on an earlier
occasion on this or any other candidate.
HHHH
The Candidate with Register No. 14MCO021 was examined by us in the project viva –
voice examination held on ............................
INTERNAL EXAMINER EXTERNAL EXAMINER
SIGNATURE
Ms. R.HEMALATHA
PROJECT SUPERVISOR
Department of ECE
Kumaraguru College of Technology
Coimbatore-641 049
SIGNATURE
Dr. A.VASUKI
HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
Department of ECE
Kumaraguru College of Technology
Coimbatore-641 049
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First, I would like to express my praise and gratitude to the Lord, who has
showered his grace and blessings enabling me to complete this project in an excellent
manner.
I express my sincere thanks to the management of Kumaraguru College of
Technology and Joint Correspondent Shri Shankar Vanavarayar for his kind
support and for providing necessary facilities to carry out the work.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to our beloved Principal
Dr.R.S.Kumar Ph.D., Kumaraguru College of Technology, who encouraged me with
his valuable thoughts.
I would like to thank Dr.A.Vasuki Ph.D., Head of the Department, Electronics
and Communication Engineering, for her kind support and for providing necessary
facilities to carry out the project work.
In particular, I wish to thank with everlasting gratitude to the Project
Coordinator Dr.M.Alagumeenaakshi Ph.D., Assistant Professor- III, Department of
Electronics and Communication Engineering, throughout the course of this project
work.
I am greatly privileged to express my heartfelt thanks to my project guide
Ms.R.Hemalatha M.E.,(Ph.D), Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and
Communication Engineering, for her expert counselling and guidance to make this
project to a great deal of success and I wish to convey my deep sense of gratitude to
all teaching and non-teaching staff of ECE Department for their help and cooperation.
Finally, I thank my parents and my family members for giving me the moral
support and abundant blessings in all of my activities and my dear friends who helped
me to endure my difficult times with their unfailing support and warm wishes.
iv
ABSTRACT
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) is an extension of optical
networking. DWDM devices combine the output of more than eight optical
transmitters for transmission across a single optical fiber. Problems like dispersion,
cross talk and other non-linear effects occur in optical networks. Dispersion is the
spreading out of a signal as it travels down the fiber. Chromatic dispersion and
polarization mode dispersion (PMD) affects the DWDM. Chromatic Dispersion (CD)
is a major factor in the transmission of data over a long haul application. Many
techniques can be used to overcome the losses caused by CD.
The proposed work focuses on the dispersion and its compensation techniques
and methods to alleviate/suppress fiber Non linear effects on DWDM networks. In
order to compensate for the dispersion, various compensation techniques like Fiber
Bragg Grating (FBG), Dispersion Compensation Fiber (DCF), Electronic Dispersion
Compensation (EDC), and Optical filter are employed. The DWDM architecture is
implemented using OptSim. The simulation results show the performance of the
DWDM system in terms of Bit Error Rate (BER), Q-factor and Eye diagram.
Optical Nonlinearities give rise to many ubiquitous effects in optical
transmission system. Power level carried by fiber increases which generates nonlinear
effect such as Self Phase Modulation (SPM), Cross Phase Modulation (XPM) and
Four Wave Mixing (FWM). The effect of Cross phase modulation in DWDM system
is reduced inducing the negative optical dispersion effect. The effect of Self Phase
Modulation is eliminated through parametric runs from -10ps/nm/km to
10ps/nm/km.The FWM leads to crosstalk in DWDM system whose channel spacing is
narrow. By introducing appropriate positive/negative effects and by providing unequal
spacing between channels it is possible to suppress FWM crosstalk.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
NO TITLE
PAGE
NO
ABSTRACT iv
LIST OF TABLES vii
LIST OF FIGURES viii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xi
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Overview of optical fiber 1
1.2WDM 1
1.3 DWDM 3
1.4 DWDM systems 3
1.5 Introduction to Optsim tool 5
1.5.1 Features 6
2 LITERATURE SURVEY 8
3 PROPOSED SYSTEM 11
3.1Dispersion 11
3.2 Chromatic Dispersion 11
3.2.1 Waveguide Dispersion 11
3.2.2 Material dispersion 12
3.3 Polarization mode dispersion 12
3.4 Compensation Techniques 13
3.4.1 Fiber Bragg Grating 13
3.4.2 Dispersion Compensation Fiber 14
3.4.2.1 Pre-Compensation technique 15
3.4.2.2 Post-Compensation technique 15
3.4.2.3Symmetric-Compensation technique 15
3.4.3 Electronic Dispersion compensation 16
3.4.4 Optical Filter 17
3.5 Non Linear Effects 18
3.5.1 Self phase modulation 18
3.5.2 Cross phase modulation 20
3.5.3 Four wave mixing 22
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 24
4.1 DWDM-(without Compensation) 24
4.2 DWDM with Dispersion Compensation 29
4.2.1 Fiber Bragg Grating 29
4.2.2 Dispersion Compensation Fiber 33
4.2.2.1 Pre-Compensation 33
4.2.2.2 Post-Compensation 36
4.2.2.3 Symmetric Compensation 38
4.2.3 Electronic Dispersion Compensation 40
4.2.4 Optical filter 42
4.3 Non Linear Effects 49
4.3.1 Cross Phase Modulation 49
4.3.2 Self Phase Modulation 52
4.3.3 Four Wave Mixing 56
5 CONCLUSION 62
6 REFERENCES 64
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 67
vii
LIST OF TABLES
S.No. CAPTION PAGE NO.
4.1
Analysis of various Dispersion Compensation techniques
using BER as the performance indicator
48
4.2 Analysis of different dispersion compensation techniques
using Q parameter as a performance metric
49
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
NO. CAPTION PAGE NO.
1.1 Wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) 2
3.1 Chromatic Dispersion 11
3.2 Different fiber brag gratings structures 13
3.3 Block diagram of pre-compensation 15
3.4 Block diagram of post compensation 15
3.5 Block diagram of Symmetric compensation 16
3.6 Block diagram of Electronic Dispersion compensation 16
3.7 Self Phase Modulation 18
3.8 Formation of Fourth Spurious Component 22
4.1 Design of Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (without
compensation) 24
4.2 Dispersion Map for without Compensation 27
4.3 Eye diagram of receiver 8 28
4.4 BER plot for without Compensation 28
4.5 Q-factor plot for without Compensation 29
4.6 Design of DWDM using fiber bragg grating 29
4.7 Eye diagram of receiver 1 30
4.8 BER plot for FBG without EDFA 31
4.9 Q-factor plot for FBG without EDFA 31
4.10 Eye diagram of receiver 1 32
4.11 BER plot for FBG with EDFA 32
4.12 Q- plot for FBG with EDFA 33
4.13 Design of DWDM using DCF (pre-compensation) 34
ix
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
NO. CAPTION PAGE NO.
4.14 Eye diagram of receiver 1 34
4.15 BER plot for pre compensation 35
4.16 Q-factor plot for pre compensation 35
4.17 Design of DWDM Using DCF (Post Compensation) 36
4.18 Eye diagram of receiver 3 37
4.19 BER plot for post compensation 37
4.20 Q- factor plot for post compensation 38
4.21 Design of DWDM Using DCF (Symmetric Compensation) 38
4.22 Eye diagram of receiver 1 39
4.23 BER plot for Symmetric compensation 39
4.24 Q-factor plot for Symmetric compensation 40
4.25 Design of DWDM Using Electronic Dispersion Compensation 41
4.26 Eye diagram of receiver 6 41
4.27 BER plot for Electronic dispersion compensation 42
4.28 Q-factor plot for Electronic dispersion compensation 42
4.29 Design of DWDM Using optical filter 43
4.30 Eye diagram of receiver 1 44
4.31 Eye diagram of receiver 6 44
4.32 BER plot for lorentzian filter 45
4.33 Q-factor plot for lorentzian filter 45
4.34 Eye diagram of receiver 6 46
4.35 BER plot for fabry- perotfilter 46
4.36 Q-factor plot for fabry- perot filter 47
x
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
NO. CAPTION PAGE NO.
4.37 Simulation Setup of Cross Phase Modulation (XPM) 50
4.38 Eye diagram of receiver 1 51
4.39 Eye diagram of receiver 1 51
4.40 Dispersion value vs BER &Q-factor 52
4.41 Simulation Setup of Self Phase Modulation (SPM) 53
4.42 Eye diagram for before Self Phase Modulation 54
4.43 Eye diagram for after Self Phase Modulation of distance 50km
and dispersion value = -5ps/nm/km 54
4.44 Eye diagram for after Self Phase Modulation of distance
100km and dispersion value = -5ps/nm/km 55
4.45 Eye diagram for after Self Phase Modulation of distance
140km and dispersion value = -5ps/nm/km 55
4.46 Length of fiber vs BER &Q-factor 56
4.47 Simulation Setup of Four Wave Mixing (FWM) 57
4.48 Input spectrum 57
4.49 Output spectrum Dispersion value=1ps/nm/km 58
4.50 Output spectrum Dispersion value=2ps/nm/km 58
4.51 Output spectrum Dispersion value=3ps/nm/km 59
4.52 Output spectrum Dispersion value =4ps/nm/km 59
4.53 Output spectrum Dispersion value =5ps/nm/km 60
4.54 Output spectrum Dispersion value =6ps/nm/km 60
4.55 Equal channel spacing 61
4.56 Unequal channel spacing 61
xi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
WDM Wavelength Division Multiplexing
DWDM Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing
TDM Time Division Multiplexing
CW LASER Continuous Wave LASER
MUX Multiplexer
DEMUX Demultiplexer
FBG Fiber Bragg Grating
DCF Dispersion Compensation Fiber
EDC Electronic Compensation Fiber
EDFA Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier
PBRS Pseudo Random Bit Sequence
BER Bit Error Rate
PON Passive Optical Network
XPM Cross Phase Modulation
SPM Self Phase Modulation
FWM Four Wave Mixing
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 OVERVIEW OF OPTICAL FIBER
Fiber-optic communication is a method of transmitting information from one
place to another by sending pulses of light through an optical fiber. The light forms an
electromagnetic carrier wave that is modulated to carry information. Because of its
advantages over electrical transmission, optical fibers have largely replaced copper
wire communications in core networks in the developed world. Optical fiber is used
by many telecommunications companies to transmit telephone signals, internet
communications and cable television signals. Researchers at Bell Labs have reached
internet speeds of over 100 data bits per second using fiber-optic communication. The
process of communicating using fiber-optics involves the following basic steps:
Creating the optical signal involving the use of a transmitter, relaying the signal along
the fiber, ensuring that the signal does not become too distorted or weak, receiving the
optical signal, and converting it into an electrical signal.
The important features are,
Immunity to electromagnetic interference, including nuclear electromagnetic
pulses (although fiber can be damaged by alpha and beta radiation).
High electrical resistance, making it safe to use near high-voltage equipment or
between areas with different earth potentials.
Lighter weight – important, for example, in aircraft.
Much smaller cable size – important where pathway is limited, such as
networking an existing building, where smaller channels can be drilled and
space can be saved in existing cable ducts and trays.
1.2 WDM
In fiber-optic communications, wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) is a
technology which multiplexes a number of optical carrier signals onto a single optical
2
fiber by using different wavelengths (i.e., colors) of laser light as shown in Fig 1.1.
This technique enables bidirectional communications over one strand of fiber, as well
as multiplication of capacity.
Fig 1.1 Wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM)
A WDM system uses a multiplexer at the transmitter to join several signals
together and a demultiplexer at the receiver to split them apart. With the right type of
fiber it is possible to have a device that does both simultaneously and can function as
an optical add-drop multiplexer. The optical filtering devices used have
conventionally been etalons (stable solid-state single-frequency Fabry–Pérot
interferometers in the form of thin-film-coated optical glass).
Most WDM systems operate on single-mode fiber optical cables, which have a
core diameter of 9 µm. Certain forms of WDM can also use multi-mode fiber cables
(also known as premises cables) which have core diameters of 50 or 62.5 µm.
WDM systems are divided into different wavelength patterns,
conventional/coarse wavelength division multiplexing (CWDM) and Dense
wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM). Conventional WDM systems provide up
to 8 channels in the 3rd transmission window (C-Band) of silica fibers around 1,550
nm. Dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) uses the same transmission
window but with denser channel spacing. Channel plans vary, but a typical system
would use 40 channels at 100 GHz spacing or 80 channels with 50 GHz spacing.
Some technologies are capable of 12.5 GHz spacing (sometimes called ultra dense
3
WDM). New amplification options (Raman amplification) enable the extension of the
usable wavelengths to the L-band, more or less doubling these numbers.
1.3 DWDM
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) is a technology that allows
multiple information streams to be transmitted simultaneously over a single fiber. This
provides a cost effective method to increase the capacity of the existing networks
without the need to add additional fiber [3].
1.4 DWDM systems
The basic DWDM system contains several main components:
1. DWDM terminal multiplexer: The terminal multiplexer contains a wavelength-
converting transponder for each data signal, an optical multiplexer and if necessary an
optical amplifier (EDFA). Each wavelength-converting transponder receives an
optical data signal from the client-layer, such as Synchronous optical networking
[SONET /SDH] or another type of data signal, converts this signal into the electrical
domain and re-transmits the signal at a specific wavelength using a 1,550 nm band
laser. These data signals are then combined together into a multi-wavelength optical
signal using an optical multiplexer, for transmission over a single fiber (e.g., SMF-28
fiber). The terminal multiplexer may or may not also include a local transmit EDFA
for power amplification of the multi-wavelength optical signal. In the mid-1990s
DWDM systems contained 4 or 8 wavelength-converting transponders; by 2000 or so,
commercial systems capable of carrying 128 signals were available.
2. Intermediate line repeater: It is placed approximately every 80–100 km to
compensate for the loss of optical power as the signal travels along the fiber. The
'multi-wavelength optical signal' is amplified by an EDFA, which usually consists of
several amplifier stages.
3. Intermediate optical terminal or optical add-drop multiplexer: This is a remote
amplification site that amplifies the multi-wavelength signal that may have traversed
up to 140 km or more before reaching the remote site. Optical diagnostics and
telemetry are often extracted or inserted at such a site, to allow for localization of any
4
fiber breaks or signal impairments. In more sophisticated systems (which are no
longer point-to-point), several signals out of the multi-wavelength optical signal may
be removed and dropped locally.
4. DWDM terminal demultiplexer: At the remote site, the terminal de-multiplexer
consisting of an optical de-multiplexer and one or more wavelength-converting
transponders separates the multi-wavelength optical signal back into individual data
signals and outputs them on separate fibers for client-layer systems (such as
SONET/SDH). Originally, this de-multiplexing was performed entirely passively,
except for some telemetry, as most SONET systems can receive 1,550 nm signals.
However, in order to allow for transmission to remote client-layer systems (and to
allow for digital domain signal integrity determination) such de-multiplexed signals
are usually sent to O/E/O output transponders prior to being relayed to their client-
layer systems. Often, the functionality of output transponder has been integrated into
that of input transponder, so that most commercial systems have transponders that
support bi-directional interfaces on both their 1,550 nm (i.e., internal) side, and
external (i.e., client-facing) side. Transponders in some systems supporting 40 GHz
nominal operation may also perform forward error correction (FEC) via digital
wrapper technology, as described in the ITU-T G.709 standard.
5. Optical Supervisory Channel (OSC): This is data channel which uses an
additional wavelength usually outside the EDFA amplification band (at 1,510 nm,
1,620 nm, 1,310 nm or another proprietary wavelength). The OSC carries information
about the multi-wavelength optical signal as well as remote conditions at the optical
terminal or EDFA site. It is also normally used for remote software upgrades and user
(i.e., network operator) Network Management information. It is the multi-wavelength
analogue to SONET's DCC (or supervisory channel). ITU standards suggest that the
OSC should utilize an OC-3 signal structure, though some vendors have opted to use
100 megabit Ethernet or another signal format. Unlike the 1550 nm multi-wavelength
signal containing client data, the OSC is always terminated at intermediate amplifier
sites, where it receives local information before re-transmission.
5
Applications:
Long-haul optical networks either in point-to-point or ring topology.
Expanding the capacity of an existing optical network.
Capacity leasing for network wholesalers.
Advantages:
Transparency—Because DWDM is a physical layer architecture, it can
transparently support both TDM and data formats such as ATM, Gigabit
Ethernet, ESCON, and Fiber Channel with open interfaces over a common
physical layer.
Scalability—DWDM can leverage the abundance of dark fiber in many
metropolitan area and enterprise networks to quickly meet demand for capacity
on point-to-point links and on spans of existing SONET/SDH rings.
Dynamic provisioning—Fast, simple, and dynamic provisioning of network
connections give providers the ability to provide highbandwidth services in
days rather than months.
Disadvantages:
Dispersion
Cross-phase modulation(XPM)
Crosstalk etc.
1.5 INTRODUCTION TO OPTSIM TOOL
OptSim, Rsoft’s award-winning software tool for the design and simulation of
optical communication systems at the signal propagation level empowers the users
with models and simulation techniques that are specifically designed for PM-QPSK
and other advanced modulation formats including OFDM, D(QPSK) and duo binary.
It is basically an advanced optical communication system designed for professional
engineers. It can be used to design optical communication systems and simulate them
6
to determine their performance given various component parameters. With user
friendly simulation techniques and easy-to-use graphical user interface, OptSim
provides unmatched flexibility and usability.
1.5.1 FEATURES
1. Performance analysis (e.g. Q value, BER, Power spectra and OSNR, eye diagram).
2. Wide and complete choice of measurement (e.g. jitter, eye opening/closure,
electrical/optical spectra, chirp, optical instantaneous phase/frequency and power).
3. Link optimization: power budget, dispersion map, tailoring of pulse shape and chip,
transmitter pre-emphasis, amplifier positioning.
4. Transmission impairment analysis and assessment of countermeasures (e.g. All-
order PMD, SPM, XPM, FWM, Stimulated Raman Scattering effect).
5. Edge design and validation system sensitivity evaluation.
6. Extensive library of predefined manufacturer components makes it easy to model
commercially available devices.
OptSim works on the theory of ―blocks‖. An optical communication system is
represented as an interconnection of various blocks. Each block in this set represents a
component or subsystem in the communication system. Each block model is presented
graphically as an icon, has own set of parameters which can be modified by user. As
physical signals are passed between components in a real world communication
system, ―signal‖ data is passed between component models in the OptSim simulation.
Each block is simulated independently using the parameters specified by the user for
that block and the signal information passed into it from other blocks. This is known
as a block-oriented simulation methodology. These blocks are graphically represented
as icons in OptSim. Internally, they are represented as data structures and
sophisticated numerical algorithms.
The twin simulation engines support two complementary simulation approaches.
7
1. Block mode simulation engine: signal data is represented as one block of data and
is passed between block to block. Nonlinear fiber is simulated using the Split Step
Fourier technique in this mode.
2. Sample mode simulation engine: signal data is represented as single sample that is
passed between block to block.
Results Analysis and Post Processing:
Stage 1: General Model (Modelling preliminaries)
Stage 2: Select optimum parameters (Performance Evaluation)
Stage 3: See results after simulation (Optsim Validation).
8
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the literature surveyed in the area of DWDM.The merits
and demerits of different methods are discussed in terms of complexity, performance
and speed of computation. Dispersion is a big factor which degrades the performance
of optical communication networks. Due to this several fiber based and devices based
compensation techniques had been developed to limit their effect. The fiber and
device based compensation techniques are Dispersion Compensation Fiber, Fiber
Bragg Grating and Electronic Dispersion Compensation.
[1] An overview of fiber dispersion and nonlinearity compensation techniques in
optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexing systems
T. Ilavarasan et al,says the performance of analogue RoF suffers from noise
and linearity issues and digital RoF is degraded by fiber dispersion and nonlinearity
due to high rate of transmission .Several techniques were discussed to overcome fiber
dispersion and nonlinear effects in WDM systems. No specific compensation
technique is suited for all kind of optical systems. Therefore, the fiber dispersion and
nonlinearity compensation technique should be carefully chosen according to various
system requirements and the applications.
[2] Performance analysis of hybrid TDM/DWDM optical communication system
in the presence of FWM and ASE noise.
R.Hemalatha et al,explained the hybrid Dense Wavelength Division
Multiplexing (DWDM) and Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) Passive Optical
Network (PON).This architecture increases total number of sensors that can be
supported in a single fiber, at the same time it behaves well when compared with the
individual architectures of TDM and DWDM. The system performance degrades due
to Four-Wave Mixing (FWM) and Amplified Spontaneous Emission (ASE) noise.
The ASE noise is filtered out using a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer at receiver end
and the performance has been analyzed with eye patterns.
9
[3] Various dispersion compensation techniques for optical system
N.K. Kahlon et al,says the dispersion compensation is the most important
feature required in optical fiber communication system because, absence of it leads to
pulse spreading that cause the output pulses to overlap. Various dispersion
compensation techniques are discussed.
[4] Performance analysis of dispersion compensation using fiber bragg grating
(FBG) in optical communication
Kaushal Kumar et al, analyzed the dispersion compensation using Fiber
Bragg Grating at different fiber lengths. By varying input power (dBm), fiber cable
length (km), FBG Length (mm) and attenuation coefficient (dB/km) at cable section,
four different parameters had been investigated which are output power (dBm), noise
figure (dB), gain (dB) and Q-Factor(dB) at receiver. When input power (dBm) and
output power (dBm) are increased, gain (dB) and Q-Factor (dB) decrease. When FBG
Length (mm) is increased the output power (dBm), noise figure (dB), gain (dB), and
Q-Factor(dB) became nonlinear due to EDFA and also the gain has been
compressed.[6]
[5]An improved methodology for dispersion compensation and synchronization
in optical fiber communication networks
Ajeet Singh Verma et al,says in long haul application, dispersion is the main
parameter which needs to be compensated in order to provide high level of reliability
of service (ROS). Fiber Braggs Grating (FBG) is one of the most widely used element
to compensate it, however its performance slows down with the increase in distance.
Dispersion compensation method offers improved value of performance parameters
such as Q-facter, Min BER and threshold value compared to FBG compensation
technique. Eye diagram shows better value of threshold and eye height. DCF method
offers reduced dispersion and improved synchronization in long haul applications [4].
[6] An overview of DWDM technology &network
Reena Antil et al, says about functions and applications of DWDM system
components. The operation of each component is discussed individually.DWDM
10
terminology like Attenuation, dispersion, and optical signal to noise ratio (OSNR) are
measures of optical signal quality and are the key factors involved in DWDM system
design and operation [9].
[7 ] Architecture to integrate multiple pons with long reach DWDM backhaul
D.P.Shea et al, says about feasibility of an architecture that consolidates a
number of deployed Passive Optical Network (PON) infrastructures into a long-reach,
high-split ratio system which further increases equipment sharing between users. The
demonstrated system allows the use of uncooled lasers with possible wavelength drift
across a CWDM band (20 nm) with optical amplification and narrow optical filtering
with no performance degradation. Complete study of potential implementation was
performed with experimental results showing that a target performance of
BER(10−10) could be achieved over 120km of standard fiber with transmitter
wavelengths from 1542 to 1558 nm and DWDM back haul wavelengths from 1520 to
1535 nm.This gives the potential to support up to 2560 users.
[8] Highly scalable amplified hybrid TDM/DWDM array architecture for
interferometric fiber-optic sensor systems
Yi Liao et al, experimented a Hybrid Dense Wavelength Division
Multiplexing (DWDM) and Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) array architecture for
large scale interferometric fiber-optic sensor array systems. This architecture employs
a distributed Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifer (EDFA) scheme to decrease the
distribution loss among multiplexed wavelengths and employs TDM at each
wavelength to increase the total number of sensors that can be supported. The first
experimental demonstration of this system is reported including results which show
the potential for multiplexing and interrogating up to 4096 sensors using a single
telemetry fiber pair with good system performance. The number of interrogation
sensors could be further increased by increasing the number of wavelength channels.
11
CHAPTER 3
PROPOSED SYSTEM
3.1 DISPERSION
If a light signal is transmitted over a long haul optical fiber,its power is
dispersed with respect to time which widens shape of the pulse in the signal with time.
This is called as ―Dispersion‖(pulse broadening) of the signal. Fig 3.1 is the visual
representation of widening of shape of the pulse when transmitted through fiber.
Fig 3.1 Chromatic dispersion
Signal dispersion is seen due to multiple modes in the fiber, fiber material and
nonlinearities in fiber.Two general types of dispersion affect DWDM systems. One of
these effects, chromatic dispersion, is linear while the other, polarization mode
dispersion (PMD), is nonlinear [8].
3.2.CHROMATIC DISPERSION
Chromatic Dispersion (CD) is a phenomenon in optical fiber which is created
because of dependence of group index on wavelength which causes a temporal
broadening in optical pulses as they propagate through fiber. It can be divided into
two major components in standard single mode fibers [1].
3.2.1 Waveguide Dispersion
The Waveguide Dispersion is caused by physical structure of optical fiber core
and cladding. As a result of which different wavelengths propagate at different
velocities in optical fiber.
12
3.2.2 Material dispersion
Material dispersion is the dominant part of CD and is caused by change of
optical fiber refractive index ―n‖ with wavelength ―λ‖. After a certain propagation
distance, the broadening of pulses causes a significant number of errors at receiver.
3.3 POLARIZATION MODE DISPERSION
In an ideal optical fiber there is no distinguished optical axis, the material of
the core and of the cladding are isotropic, which means that a phenomenon of
birefringerence does not exist. In real optical fibers the tensions, change of thickness,
and the accidental changes of shape & core diameter cause an accidental formation of
distinguished optical axes and local birefringerence. As a consequence, two
orthogonal components travelling in a fiber as ordinary and extraordinary ray move in
the fiber with different velocities.
The different velocities of the two orthogonal components generate the phase
difference changing in time of propagation along fiber and change of polarization.
Besides the change of polarization with time of propagation, the different velocities of
ordinary ray (polarization vector is perpendicular to the plane of the optical axis) and
extraordinary ray (polarization in the same plane as the optical axis) cause that the
rays reach the end of a fiber in different time.
The changes of polarization are not essential, as long as a continuous light in a
fiber is propagated (Continuous Wave, CW) because the majority of detectors are not
sensitive to polarization state changes. However, in many applications the
maintenance of a constant polarization is essential, e.g. in optical interferometer,
optical lasers, sensors, optoelectrical modulators, in coherent transmission as well as
in the coupling of integrated optical circuits.
13
3.4 COMPENSATION TECHNIQUES
3.4.1 Fiber Bragg Grating
A Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) is a type of distributed Bragg reflector
constructed in a short segment of optical fiber that reflects particular wavelengths of
light and transmits all others. This is achieved by creating a periodic variation in the
refractive index of the fiber core, which generates a wavelength-specific dielectric
mirror. A Fiber Bragg Grating can therefore be used as an inline optical filter to block
certain wavelengths, or as a wavelength-specific reflector.
3.4.1.1 Grating Structure
The structure of the FBG can vary via the refractive index, or the grating
period. The grating period can be uniform or graded, and either localised or
distributed in a superstructure. The refractive index has two primary characteristics,
the refractive index profile, and the offset[11]. Typically, the refractive index profile
can be uniform or apodized, and the refractive index offset is positive or zero. Fig 3.2
shows different kinds of FBG Strucures
Fig 3.2 Different fiber bragg gratings structures
14
There are six common structures for FBGs
1. Uniform positive-only index change
2. Gaussian apodized
3. Raised-cosine apodized
4. Chirped
5. Discrete phase shift
6. Superstructure
Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings
The refractive index profile of the grating may be modified to add other
features, such as a linear variation in the grating period, called a chirp. The reflected
wavelength, changes with the grating period broadening the reflected spectrum. A
grating possessing a chirp has the property of adding dispersion—namely,different
wavelengths reflected from the grating will be subject to different delays.
Tilted Fiber Bragg Gratings
The grading or variation of the refractive index is along the length of the fiber
(the optical axis), and is typically uniform across the width of the fiber. In a tilted
FBG (TFBG), the variation of the refractive index is at an angle to the optical axis.
3.4.2 Dispersion Compensation Fiber
Dispersion compensation essentially means cancelling the chromatic dispersion of
some optical elements. The goal is to avoid excessive temporal broadening of ultra
short pulses and/or the distortion of signals[6].Dispersion compensation is used
mainly in mode-locked lasers and in telecommunication systems, but also sometimes
in optical fibers transporting light to or from some fiber-optic sensor[12]-[16].
There are two types of compensation schemes pre and post compensation, where
the Dispersion Compensation Fiber (DCF) is placed before and after the SMF or
symmetrically across the SMF. A DCF should have low insertion loss, low
polarization mode dispersion and low optical nonlinearity effects and also it should
15
have large chromatic dispersion coefficient to minimize the size of a DCF [7]-[20]. By
placing a DCF with negative dispersion after an SMF with positive dispersion, the net
dispersion should be zero.
3.4.2.1 Pre-Compensation technique
Fig 3.3 Block diagram of pre-compensation
In pre-compensation technique, the DCF is placed before the SMF as shown in
Fig.3.3. This scheme modifies the characteristics of input pulses at transmitter, before
they are sent into the fiber link, to compensate the effect of fiber dispersion.
3.4.2.2 Post-Compensation technique
In post-compensation technique, the DCF is placed after the SMF[19]. To
compensate the effect of fiber dispersion, this scheme modifies the characteristics of
optical pulses at the receiver as shown in Fig 3.4.
Fig 3.4 Block diagram of post compensation
16
3.4.2.3 Symmetric Compensation technique
In Symmetric-compensation technique, the DCF is placed before & after the
SMF,to compensate the effect of fiber dispersion as shown in Fig 3.5
.
Fig 3.5 Block diagram of Symmetric compensation
3.4.3 Electronic Dispersion Compensation
Electronic compensation technique makes use of electronics in conjunction with
optics in order to compensate dispersion [15]. Electronic Dispersion Compensation
(EDC) has become an important part of an optical transponder design. At present,
most of the installed optical fiber in the current metropolitan environment consists of
single mode fiber with a CD value of about 17ps/nm/km at a wavelength of 1550 nm.
In the current cost driven metro market, Electronic Dispersion Compensation can
become a very important tool in enhancing the existing fiber links to higher bit rates.
Fig.3.6 shows that block diagram of EDC using a feed forward equalizer and decision
feedback equalizer.
Fig 3.6 Block diagram of Electronic Dispersion compensation
17
3.4.4 Optical Filter
The use of Optical Filter to compensate dispersion is the most effective way of
dispersion compensation using fabry-perot and lorentzian filter. Fabry-Perot filter
have been widely used in optical fiber communications and Insertion Loss (IL) is one
of its important characteristics. This type of filter transmits a narrow band of
wavelengths and rejects wavelengths outside of that band. The filter has the ability to
"select" a different peak wavelength, as the filter is tilted. Fabry-perot filter can be
used to select wavelength for each channel in wavelength division multiplexing
(WDM) system. The main advantages of this filter are low loss, high tuning speed,
wide tuning range, high finesse, and flexible structures and different practical
applications [18].
3.4.4.1Fabry-perot Filter
The Fabry–Pérot interferometer is a pair of partially reflective glass optical
flats spaced micrometers to centimeters apart, with the reflective surfaces facing each
other. The flats in an interferometer are often made in a wedge shape to prevent the
rear surfaces from producing interference fringes, the rear surfaces often also have
an anti-reflective coating.
In a typical system, illumination is provided by a diffuse source set at the focal
plane of a collimating lens. A focusing lens after the pair of flats would produce an
inverted image of the source if the flats were not present, all light emitted from a point
on the source is focused to a single point in the system's image plane. In the
accompanying illustration, only one ray emitted from point A on the source is traced.
As the ray passes through the paired flats, it is multiply reflected to produce multiple
transmitted rays which are collected by the focusing lens and brought to point A' on
the screen. The complete interference pattern takes the appearance of a set of
concentric rings. The sharpness of the rings depends on the reflectivity of the flats. If
the reflectivity is high, it result in a high Q factor, monochromatic light produces a set
of narrow bright rings against a dark background. A Fabry–Pérot interferometer with
high Q is said to have high finesse.
18
3.5 NON LINEAR EFFECTS
Nonlinear effects in optical fibers occur due to
(1) change in the refractive index of the medium with optical intensity and,
(2) inelastic scattering phenomenon.
The power dependence of the refractive index is responsible for the Kerr-effect.
Depending upon the type of input signal, the Kerr-nonlinearity manifests itself in
three different effects such as Self-Phase Modulation (SPM), Cross-Phase Modulation
(XPM) and Four-Wave Mixing (FWM) [5].
3.5.1 Self phase modulation(SPM)
SPM arises because the refractive index of the fiber has an intensity-dependent
component. This nonlinear refractive index causes an induced phase shift, which is
proportional to the intensity of the pulse. Thus different parts of the pulse undergo a
different phase shift, which gives rise to chirping of the pulses. The pulse chirping in
turn enhances the pulse broadening effects of chromatic dispersion. This chirping
effect is proportional to the transmitted signal power so the SPM effects are more
pronounced in systems using high-transmitted powers. The SPM-induced chirp affects
the pulse broadening effects of chromatic dispersion as shown in Fig 3.7 and thus is
important to consider for high-bit-rate systems that already have significant chromatic
dispersion limitations[13].
Fig 3.7 Self Phase Modulation
19
Methods to reduce SPM
1. Recovery of pulse by proper filtering.
2. Reduction in effective length.
3. Increase in core area of the fiber
Recovery of pulse by proper filtering:
The main effect of SPM is the broadening of pulse at high power level. One
way to reduce this effect is to slice the output broadened spectrum by proper choice of
filters. In this method dispersion shifted fiber is used as transmission media. The
pulses at 10 GHz from a ring laser with variable pulse width (9 - 20) ps at a
wavelength of 1541 nanometer is amplified to average power of 16dBm and
transmitted to distance of 5 km using DSF. At the output of DSF, an optical band pass
filter is used to slice the SPM broadened spectrum. The centre frequency of the band
pass filter is 1541.5 nm and the output pulse characteristics are measured with a
40GHz photo detector. It is observed that output pulse width is almost constant at 14.5
ps for input pulse width between (9-16) ps. This shows that the output pulse width is
comparable to input pulse width and hence SPM effect is reduced.
Limitations:
1. One of the main limitations to this approach is with regard to input power. The
input power is constant at 16dBm. Since the SPM effect comes into place at higher
power level, variation of input power from low to high level must be taken to clearly
understand the SPM effect.
2. The input pulse width is varied from (9-16) ps and remain constant at 14.5 ps In
fact, the input pulse width should remain constant and widening of pulse due to the
SPM effect must be reduced.
3. Length of DSF fiber is 5 km which is practically very short.
Reduction in effective length:
The nonlinear interaction depends upon the transmission length. The longer the link
length, the more the interaction and the worse the effect of nonlinearity. By
20
decreasing effective length of the fiber this effect may be reduced but by doing so the
maximum transmission distance is also reduced.
Increase in effective core area:
Another approach to reduce this effect is to increase the effective core area of the
fiber. The variation in refractive index at high power level is given by
𝑛′ = 𝑛𝑗 + 𝑛2 𝑃 𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 (3.1)
where j = 1, 2, n2 is the nonlinear index co-efficient, P is the optical power and Aeff is
the effective core area. So increasing core effective area can decrease the variation in
refractive index. This method is used in present work to reduce the SPM effect. The
DCF fiber is used and signal is transmitted up to 150 km.
This method over comes the limitation of first method in the following manner.
1. The input power is varied from 10 dBm to 17.5 dBm to show clearly the effect of
the SPM.
2. Input pulse width is constant (59 ps).
3. Distance of transmitting fiber is increased from 5 km to 100 km.
3.5.2 Cross Phase Modulation(XPM)
The response of any dielectric to light becomes Non-linear for intense
electromagnetic fields, and optical fibers are no exception. On a fundamental level,
the origin of Non-linear response is related to a harmonic motion of a bound electron
under the influence of an applied field. Cross phase Modulation (XPM) had been
derived from the fact that the refractive index of the fiber in nonlinearity converts the
optical intensity fluctuations in co-propagating channel. In addition, since the
refractive index seen by particular wavelength is influenced by both the optical
intensity of that wave and by the optical power fluctuation of the neighbouring
wavelength, SPM is always present when XPM occurs.
For a system,non-linearity coefficient is given by
21
𝛾 = 𝑛2𝜔𝑗
𝑐𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓
(3.2)
Where n2is refractive index, ω is frequency, c is speed of light; i.e., 3*108m/s and
Aeff is effective core area. Analogous to SPM, for two interacting wavelength the
XPM induced frequency shift is given by
∆𝜑 = 𝛾𝑗 𝑃𝑗 +2𝑃3−𝑗 𝑍 (3.3)
Where nonlinear phase change and P is power (incident optical power). The
factor2 in above equation (3.3) has its origin in the form of nonlinear susceptibility
and indicates that XPM is twice as effective as SPM for the same amount of power.
The first term in equation (3.3) represents the contribution of SPM and second term is
that of XPM. It can be observed that XPM is effective only when the interacting
signals superimpose in time. XPM hinders the system performance through the same
mechanism as SPM i.e. chirping frequency and chromatic dispersion. But XPM can
damage the system performance even more than SPM. XPM influences the system
severely when number of channels are large. Theoretically, for a 100-channels system,
XPM imposes a power limit of 0.1mW per channel.
XPM appears only when two interacting light beams or pulses overlap in space. Time
pulses with two different wavelength channels will not remain superimposed since
each has different Group Velocity Dispersion (GVD). This greatly reduces the impact
of XPM for direct detection of optical fiber transmission systems. XPM could be the
problem for high rate ultra-dense WDM systems (2.5Gbps-10Gbps system with
wavelength spacing of 25GHz or less).
To avoid XPM, a fiber should carry the pulses that do not travel together for
longer distance. Thus it requires a large group velocity change as the function of
frequency. Large dispersion will give large velocity difference which will give small
walk-off time and thus reduction in XPM will be obtained. It can be greatly mitigated
in WDM systems operating over standard non dispersion shifted single mode fiber.
One more advantage of this kind of fiber is its effective core area, which is typically
80 μm2. This large effective area is helpful in reducing nonlinear effects because γ is
22
inversely proportional to Aeff. Like SPM, the XPM also depends on interaction length
of fiber (from equation 3.2). The long interaction length is always helpful in building
up this effect up to a significant level.
3.5.3 Four Wave Mixing
3.5.3.1 Basics of FWM
The interaction of two or more light waves can lead to a second kind of χ (3)
nonlinearities. These involve an energy transfer between waves and not simply a
modulation of the index seen by one of them due to the other. This interaction is often
referred to as ―parametric,‖ and these nonlinearities lead to parametric processes. Four
wave mixing (FWM) is one of the most troubling issues[2]. Three signals combine to
form a fourth spurious or mixing component, hence the name four wave mixing and is
shown in Figure 3.8 in terms of frequency ω:
Fig 3.8 Formation of Fourth Spurious Component
Four-wave mixing transfers energy from a strong pump wave to two waves up
shifted and down shifted in frequency from the pump frequency 𝜔1. If only the pump
wave is incident at the fiber and the phase-matching condition is satisfied, the Stokes
and anti-Stokes waves at the frequencies 𝜔3 and 𝜔4 can be generated from noise. On
the other hand, if a weak signal at 𝜔3 is also launched into the fiber together with the
pump, the signal is amplified while a new wave at 𝜔4 is generated simultaneously.
The gain responsible for such amplification is called the parametric gain [14].
Effects of FWM:
Four Wave Mixing (FWM) is one of the most troubling issues. Three signals
combine to form a fourth spurious or mixing component, hence the name four wave
mixing. Spurious components cause following problems:
23
1. Interference between wanted signal.
2. It generates additional noise and degrades system performance.
3. Power is lost from wanted signals into unwanted spurious signals.
The total number of mixing components increases dramatically with the number of
channels. The total number of mixing components, M is calculated from the equation
𝑀 = 12 𝑁2 𝑁 − 1 (3.4)
Thus three channels create 9 additional signals and so on. As N increases, M also
increases rapidly, where N is number of channels.
Effect of Dispersion and Channel Spacing on FWM
As dispersion increases, effect of four wave mixing decreases. For dispersion of
16ps/nm, FWM effect reduces but chromatic dispersion increases. At zero dispersion
FWM effect is more hence fiber having dispersion 4ps/nm is used where FWM effect
is less and fiber is called Non-Zero dispersion shifted fiber. Due to equal spacing
some FWM components overlap in the DWDM channels. But in unequal spacing
there is no overlapping signals in the DWDM channels.
24
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
4.1 DWDM-(without Compensation)
The model for the design of DWDM-(without Compensation) in Optsim (Optical
Simulator) tool is shown in Fig 4.1.
Fig 4.1 Design of Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (without
compensation)
Figure 4.1 represents eight channel DWDM link with wide channel spacing. The eight
channels are specified at the wavelengths from 1.5500 µm to 1.5501 µm. The random
25
binary signals are given to PBRS generator which is converted into electrical signal
using electrical generator. After the signals are generated in the direct modulated laser
models, they are multiplexed into a single optical signal by the MUX model block.
This model is set for ideal multiplexing. At the output of the MUX, the optical signal
passes through a length of fiber (140km). After demultiplexing, the individual signals
are sent to eight separate receivers. The received signals are analyzed using BER
tester, Q-Factor tester, dispersion analyzer and eye analyzer blocks.
PRBS Pattern Generator:
This model generates a binary sequence of several different types. The incoming
random bits of binary inputs are given to electrical generator to change it to electrical
signals. Each channel may have its own model instance configured to provide a
different pattern than the other model instances. PRBS Pattern Generator uses a Bit
rate of 10e-9.
Electrical Signal Generator:
This model converts an input binary signal into an output electrical signal. The output
signal may be specified as either voltage or current. The user parameters are used to
configure the electrical signal output. Different modulation formats available are RZ,
NRZ and Manchester. Manchester type modulation is used.
CW Laser:
This model produces the optical signal output of one or more CW lasers. It is most
commonly used in conjunction with the external modulator model to encode a binary
signal. For CW Laser the Peak power is 1.0e-3 watts.
Modulator:
This models an electro-optic modulator. The electrical signal is sent to an external
optical modulator and it is directly detected. The nonlinearity introduced by the
external modulator gives rise to clipping effects that can be seen both on the received
eye diagram and received signal spectrum.
26
Nonlinear Fiber:
This model provides a detailed implementation of propagation of one or more optical
channel in a Single Mode Fiber (SMF).SMF takes single path through the core. It has
no intermodal dispersion. It takes into account attenuation, dispersion, polarization
mode dispersion (PMD) and nonlinearities. When the Single Channel mode of the
MUX is used prior to the fiber model, it also takes into account four wave mixing.
Fiber length is varied from 10km to 140km.
Optical Multiplexer (Nx1 MUX):
This model represents an optical WDM multiplexer. It accepts multiple optical signals
at its input ports and produces a single WDM optical signal at its output port which
includes all the input WDM optical signals.
Physical EDFA:
This block models the operation of an Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA) via a
set of well-established physical equations. The model supports component
specification at different levels of complexity, as well as a variety of pump and signal
configurations. Forward-propagating optical signals are launched into the EDFA via
the first input node, while backward-propagating signal enter via the second input
node. The EDFA may also be used to simulate bidirectional signal propagation, in
which case input signals are expected at both input nodes, and an additional backward
output appears at the backward output node.
Optical Splitter (1xN):
This model represents an ideal optical splitter. It takes a single input signal, and
divides it equally among 16 output ports with 1/16 splitting loss, plus excess loss
determined by the transmission model parameter.
Optical Demultiplexer (1xN DEMUX):
This model represents an optical WDM demultiplexer. It accepts single optical signals
at its input ports and produces a multiple WDM optical signal at its output port given
to different users that includes all the input WDM optical signals.
27
Signal Spectrum Analyzer:
The Signal Spectrum block is used to display the spectrum of a signal at the node
connected to its input ports. The signal plot of the summer as well as CW laser output
can be viewed.
Eye Diagram Analyzer:
This Eye Diagram block is used to display the eye diagram of a signal at the node
connected to its input ports. By default, it displays the magnitude of optical signals
and the real value of electrical signals.
Bit Error Rate Tester:
This model computes the Bit Error Rate (BER) for the input electrical signal(s) as
well as a number of useful parameters such as the Q factor and electrical properties
such as the height and width.
Dispersion Map
Fig 4.2 Dispersion Map for without Compensation
The output of dispersion analyzer block is shown in Fig 4.2.The eight different colors
correspond to eight DWDM channels with the different wavelength of 1.5501µm
to1.5507µm. As the length of the fiber increases, dispersion also increases.
28
Simulation Results
The eye diagram for the DWDM system without any dispersion compensation is
shown in Fig 4.3. Eye closure shows that the signal has been distorted due to
dispersion.
Fig 4.3 Eye diagram of receiver 1
Figure 4.4 and 4.5 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system without any dispersion compensation. It is found that the Bit Error
Rate (BER) is100 & Q parameter is 0.
Fig 4.4 BER plot for DWDM system without dispersion Compensation
29
Fig 4.5 Q-factor plot for DWDM system without dispersion Compensation
4.2 VARIOUS COMPENSATION TECHNIQUES
4.2.1 Fiber Bragg Grating
The model for the design of DWDM using Fiber Bragg Grating in Optsim (Optical
Simulator) tool is shown in Fig 4.6.
Fig 4.6 Design of DWDM using Fiber Bragg Grating
30
The eight channel DWDM link is designed with wide channel spacing. The eight
channels are used at the wavelengths 1.5501µm to1.5507µm.The PRBS block is to
generate the binary sequences of different types. The optical signals are generated in
direct modulated laser block and they are multiplexed using MUX model block. The
multiplexed optical signal is transmitted along the fiber of length 40 km. It is then
passed through an Fiber Bragg Grating to compensate the dispersion and then
demultiplexed using DEMUX model block, which outputs the individual signals to
eight separate receivers. The received signals are analyzed using BER tester, Q-Factor
tester and eye analyzer blocks.
Simulation Results
The eye diagram for FBG technique without EDFA is shown in Fig 4.7 and is
observed that eye opening is not wide and also has more interference.
Fig 4.7 Eye diagram of receiver 1
31
BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel DWDM system using FBG (without
EDFA) is shown in Figure 4.8 and 4.9. and it is observed that the Bit Error Rate
(BER) is 10-29.5
& Q parameter is 11.3.
Fig 4.8 BER plot for FBG without EDFA
Fig 4.9 Q-factor plot for FBG without EDFA
32
The eye diagram for FBG technique with EDFA is shown in Fig 4.10 and is observed
that eye opening is wider and interference is also lesser.
Fig 4.10 Eye diagram of receiver 1
Figure 4.11 and 4.12 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system using FBG (with EDFA). It is viewed that the Bit Error Rate (BER) is
0 & Q parameter is 1410.
Fig 4.11 BER plot for FBG with EDFA
33
Fig 4.12 Q-factor plot for FBG with EDFA
4.2.2 Dispersion Compensation Fiber
4.2.2.1 Pre-Compensation
Figure 4.13 represents eight channel DWDM link with wide channel spacing. The
eight channels are specified at the wavelengths from 1.5500 µm to 1.5501 µm.The
PRBS block is to generate the binary sequences of different types. The optical signals
are generated in direct modulated laser block and they are multiplexed using MUX
model block. The multiplexed optical signal is transmitted along the fiber of length
140 km,in which 20 km of DCF with negative chromatic dispersion coefficient of
-5ps/nm/km is placed at the link front end. At the receiving end, demultiplexing
operation is done using DEMUX model block, which outputs the individual signals to
eight separate receivers. The received signals are analyzed using BER tester, Q-Factor
tester and eye analyzer blocks.
34
Fig 4.13 Design of DWDM using DCF (pre-compensation)
Simulation Results
The eye diagram for pre compensation technique is shown in Fig 4.14 and is observed
that eye opening is wider.
Fig 4.14 Eye diagram of receiver 1
35
Figure 4.15 and 4.16 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system using DCF (Pre-Compensation). It is found that the Bit Error Rate
(BER) is 0 & Q parameter is 1410
Fig 4.15 BER plot for pre compensation.
Fig 4.16 Q-factor plot for pre compensation
36
4.2.2.2 Post-Compensation
Figure 4.17 represents eight channel DWDM link with wide channel spacing.
The eight channels are specified at the wavelengths from 1.5500 µm to 1.5501
µm. The PRBS block is to generate the binary sequences of different types. The
optical signals are generated in direct modulated laser block and they are
multiplexed using MUX model block. The multiplexed optical signal is
transmitted along the fiber of length 140 km. In which 20 km DCF with positive
chromatic dispersion coefficient (5ps/nm/km) is placed at the link far end. At the
receiving end demultiplexing operation is done using DEMUX model block,
which outputs the individual signals to eight separate receivers. The received
signals are analyzed using BER tester, Q-Factor tester and eye analyzer blocks.
Fig 4.17 Design of DWDM Using DCF (Post Compensation)
37
Simulation Results
It is observed from the eye diagram that the eye opening is wider for post
compensation technique as shown in Fig 4.18
Fig 4.18 Eye diagram of receiver 3
Figure 4.19 and 4.20 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system using DCF (Post-Compensation). It is observed that the Bit Error
Rate (BER) is 0 & Q parameter is 1410.
Fig 4.19 BER plot for post compensation
38
Fig 4.20 Q-factor plot for post compensation
4.2.2.3 Symmetric Compensation
Figure 4.21 describes DWDM link with wide channel spacing. The eight channels are
specified at the wavelengths from 1.5500 µm to 1.5501 µm.The random binary
signals are given to PBRS generator which is converted into electrical signal using
electrical generator. The optical signals are generated in direct modulated laser block
and they are multiplexed using MUX model block. Typically a 10 km of DCF is
placed before and after the single mode fiber of length 120km is achieved using
DEMUX model block, which outputs the individual signals to eight separate
receivers. The received signals are analyzed using BER tester, Q-Factor tester and eye
analyzer blocks.
Fig 4.21 Design of DWDM Using DCF (Symmetric Compensation)
39
Simulation Results
The eye diagram for symmetric compensation technique is shown in Fig 4.22.It is
observed that the eye opening is wider.
Fig 4.22 Eye diagram of receiver 1
Figure 4.23 and 4.24 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system using DCF (Symmetric-Compensation). It is examined that the Bit
Error Rate (BER) is 0 & Q parameter is 1410.
Fig 4.23 BER plot for Symmetric compensation
40
Fig 4.24 Q-factor plot for Symmetric compensation
4.2.3 Electronic Dispersion Compensation
Figure 4.25 represents eight channel DWDM link with wide channel spacing. The
eight channels are specified at the wavelengths from 1.5500 µm to 1.5501 µm. The
random binary signals are given to PBRS generator which is converted into electrical
signal using electrical generator. The optical signals are generated in direct modulated
laser block and they are multiplexed using MUX model block. The multiplexed
optical signal is transmitted along the fiber of length 50 km. The photo detector
converts the received optical signal to electrical signal and then an electrical filter is
used to further smooth the received output. Based on the analog or digital signal
processing techniques, the parameters may be adjusted automatically using the
feedback techniques, thus, minimizing the bit error rate. At the receiving end
demultiplexing operation is done using DEMUX model block, which outputs the
individual signals to eight separate receivers. The received signals are analyzed using
BER tester, Q-Factor tester and eye analyzer blocks.
41
Fig 4.25 Design of DWDM Using Electronic Dispersion Compensation
Simulation Results
The eye diagram for Electronic dispersion compensation technique is shown in
Fig4.26.Eye opening is wider in EDC technique.
Fig 4.26 Eye diagram of receiver 6
42
Figure 4.27 and 4.28 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system using Electronic Dispersion Compensation. It is noted that the Bit
Error Rate (BER) is 10-0.5
& Q parameter is 0.61.
Fig 4.27 BER plot for Electronic dispersion compensation
.
Fig 4.28 Q- factor plot for Electronic dispersion compensation
4.2.4 Optical filter
Figure 4.29 eight channel DWDM link with wide channel spacing. The eight
channels are specified at the wavelengths from 1.5500 µm to 1.5501 µm. The
PRBS block is to generate the binary sequences of different types. The optical
signals are generated in direct modulated laser block and they are multiplexed
43
using MUX model block. The multiplexed optical signal is transmitted along the
fiber of length 50 km. Fabry perot and Lorentzian filter are used to smoothen the
received signal. At the receiving end demultiplexing operation is done using
DEMUX model block, which outputs the individual signals to eight separate
receivers. The received signals are analyzed using BER tester, Q-Factor tester
and eye analyzer blocks.
Fig 4.29 Design of DWDM Using optical filter
Simulation Results
The eye diagram for optical filter (Before compensation) technique is shown in Fig
4.30.The eye diagram is severely distorted before compensation.
44
Fig 4.30 Eye diagram of receiver 1
The eye diagram for optical filter using lorentzian technique is shown in Fig 4.31.It is
observed that eye opening is clear and less interference.
Fig 4.31 Eye diagram of receiver 6
45
Figure 4.32 and 4.33 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system using Optical filter (lorentzian filter). It is shown that the Bit Error
Rate (BER) is 10-100
& Q parameter is 18.7.
10-100
Fig 4.32 BER plot for lorentzian filter
Fig 4.33 Q-factor plot for lorentzian filter
46
The eye diagram for optical filter using fabry- perot technique is shown in Fig 4.34.It
is observed both upper lid and lower lid are nicely suppressed and eye opening is
wider.
.
Fig 4.34 Eye diagram of receiver 6
Figure 4.35 and 4.36 shows that BER & Q parameter values for the eight channel
DWDM system using Optical filter(fabry- perot filter). It is found that the Bit Error
Rate (BER) is 10-100
& Q parameter is 18.6.
Fig 4.35 BER plot for fabry- perot filter
47
Fig 4.36 Q-factor plot for fabry- perot filter
BER & Q-factor Formula
𝐵𝐸𝑅 =1
2𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑐
𝑄
2 ≈
𝑒𝑥𝑝 −𝑄2 2
𝑄 2𝜋 (4.1)
Where the parameter Q is obtained from above equation
𝑄 =𝐼1 − 𝐼0
𝜎1 + 𝜎0
(4.2)
where erfc stands for the complementary error function
𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑐 𝑥 = 2
𝜋 𝑒𝑥𝑝 −𝑦2
∞
𝑥
𝑑𝑦 (4.3)
𝐼0, 𝐼1=Average value of current for bit 0 &bit 1 respectively.
𝜎0, 𝜎1=Noise variance for bit 0 &bit 1.
48
Analysis of Dispersion Compensation
Table4.1 Analysis of various Dispersion Compensation techniques using BER as
the performance indicator
S. No.
Various
Compensation
Techniques
Length of Fiber (km)
10 50 70 120 140
1 without compensation 100=1 10
0=1 10
0=1 10
0=1 10
0=1
2 FBG (without EDFA) 10-100
10-3.9
- - -
3 FBG (with EDFA) 0 0 0 10-3.9
-
4 EDC 10-0.5
10-0.5
10-0.5
- -
5
DCF (Pre , post and
Symmetric
compensation)
0 0 0 0 0
6
Op
tica
l F
ilte
r 1. Fabry perot 0 10-100
10-8.2
- -
2. Lorentzian 0 10-100
10-8.2
- -
Table4.1 shows that without any dispersion compensation, DWDM networks exhibit
maximum bit error rate. On using FBG (with and without EDFA) for compensation,
the former has better BER for increased fiber length. The performance of both fabry-
perot and lorentzian are considerably less. EDC provides a bit error rate of 10-0.5
even
for a fiber length 70km and is poorer when the distance is above 70km. Of all the
Compensation techniques, DCF achieve maximum transmission distance up to 140km
with best bit error rate performance.
49
Table 4.2 Analysis of different dispersion compensation techniques using Q
parameter as a performance metric
S. No.
Various Compensation
Techniques
Length of Fiber (km)
10 50 70 120 140
1 No compensation 0 0 0 0 0
2 FBG (without EDFA) 35.5 3.65 - - -
3 FBG (with EDFA) 1410 1410 1410 10.9 -
4 EDC 0.54 0.61 0.64 - -
5
DCF (Pre,post and
Symmetric
compensation)
1410 1410 1410 1410 1410
6
Op
tica
l F
ilte
r 1. Fabry perot 1410 18.6 5.52 - -
2. Lorentzian 1410 18.7 5.52 - -
Table 4.2 shows that dispersion compensation technique with less Q parameter value
has less BER. EDC provides a Q-factor of 0.61 even for a fiber length 70km and is
poorer when the distance is above 70km. Of all the Compensation techniques, DCF
achieve maximum transmission distance up to 140km with best Q-factor performance.
.
4.3 NON LINEAR EFFECTS
4.3.1 Cross Phase Modulation
Figure 4.37 shows the simulation setup for the analysis of Cross phase Modulation in
optical link. The XPM has been analyzed for the different values of dispersion.
Transmitter section consists of data source, modulator driver, laser source and
50
modulator. Data source produces a bit of pseudo random sequence of bits at the rate of
10Gbps. The output of the data source was given to modulator driver which produces
NRZ format pulse train. The transmitted signal was formed by modulating the light
carrier by NRZ data source. The light carrier is generated by lorentzian laser source.
Transmitter output is boosted up by the fixed gain erbium doped fiber amplifier
(EDFA). The channel section consists of Single Mode Fiber (SMF) and Fiber Bragg
Grating (FBG) with different dispersion values. In the receiver section, PIN receiver
has been used having quantum efficiency of 70%. The dark current is set at 0.1nA.
Output of the receiver section was given to the measurement devices with the help of
electrical splitter. Measurement device like electrical scope have been used.
Fig 4.37 Simulation Setup of Cross Phase Modulation (XPM)
51
Simulation Results
The eye diagram shows in Fig 4.38 that the effect of cross phase modulation is
adverse and eye is severely distorted.
Fig 4.38 Eye diagram of receiver 1
The eye diagram as in Fig 4.39 shows that the cross phase modulation is eliminated at
a distance of 150km (Dispersion value= -8ps/nm/km)
Fig 4.39 Eye diagram of receiver 1
52
Dispersion Value vs Q-factor & BER
Figure 4.40 shows BER & Q-factor for various dispersion values and is observed that
BER is constant and Q-factor increased.
Fig 4.40 Dispersion value vs BER &Q-factor
4.3.2 Self Phase Modulation
The figure 4.41 shows the simulation setup for the analysis of Self Phase Modulation
in optical link having single channel. The SPM is analysed for six values of dispersion
from -10ps/nm/km to 10ps/nm/km. The transmitter and receiver section are connected
by the dispersive fiber link. The transmitter section consists of data source, modulator
driver, laser source and modulator. Data source produces a pseudo-random sequence
of bits at a rate of 10Gbps. The output of data source is given to modulator driver
which produces a NRZ (Non return to zero) format pulse train. The transmitted signal
is formed by modulating the light carrier by the NRZ data source. Confinement factor
is 0.35, insertion loss is 3 dB and output insertion loss is 3 dB. The various parameters
are Raman fiber length of 10 km, operating temperature of 300 K, pump wavelength
of 1480 nm and pump power of 300 mW. The light carrier is generated by Lorentzian
-8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1
0
5
10
15
20
25
Dispersion Value
Qua
lity
Fac
tor
BER
Quality Factor
53
laser source at the 1550 nm wavelength. The transmitter output is boosted up by the
fixed gain Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier (fixed_output_power).
There are two types of optical amplifiers-Semiconductor Optical Amplifier
(SOA) and Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA). Due to its high gain
characteristics EDFA is used these days. The shape of the gain graph is flat having a
gain of 25 dB. The noise figure value is set at 4.5 dB. The transmission medium used
is a standard single mode fiber of 100kms length. The receiver used in the system is a
PIN receiver, which uses the PIN (p-intrinsic-n) diode as a detector with 70%
quantum efficiency is used. The dark current is set at 0.1 nA. The output of the
receiver is given to the measurement devices which are fed through the electrical
splitter, the electrical scope and the Q estimator. The optical spectrum of the signal is
observed from optical spectrum analyzer (input and output) by splitting the signal
from fiber link with the use of optical splitters. Q-factor & BER are analyzed using
simple single mode fiber without any dispersion effect and are compared with Q-
factor & BER obtained using dispersion effects for various distances.
Fig 4.41 Simulation Setup of Self Phase Modulation(SPM)
54
Simulation Results
The figure 4.42 to 4.45 below shows the eye opening for the different distances with
optical dispersion as -5ps/nm/km. It is observed that as the distance varies the Quality
factor becomes nonlinear due to the effect of Self Phase Modulation (SPM).
Eye Diagram
Fig4.42 Eye diagram for before Self Phase Modulation
Fig 4.43 Eye diagram for after Self Phase Modulation of distance
50km and dispersion value = -5ps/nm/km
55
Fig 4.44 Eye diagram for after Self Phase Modulation of distance 100km and
dispersion value = -5ps/nm/km
Fig 4.45 Eye diagram for after Self Phase Modulation of distance 140km and
dispersion value = -5ps/nm/km
56
In figure 4.46 shows BER & Q-factor for different length of fiber and is observed that
BER is 0 throughout where Q parameter varies non-linearly.
Fig 4.46 Length of fiber vs BER & Q-factor
4.3.3 FOUR WAVE MIXING
The simulation setup for the analysis of Four Wave Mixing in DWDM optical link is
shown in Fig 4.47. The FWM has been analyzed for the different value of dispersion.
Transmitter section consists of data source, modulator driver, laser source and
modulator. Data source produces a bit of pseudo random sequence of bits at the rate of
10Gbps. The output of the data source is given to modulator driver which produces
NRZ format pulse train. The transmitted signal is formed by modulating the light
carrier by NRZ data source. The light carrier is generated by lorentzian laser source.
Transmitter output is boosted up by the fixed gain Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier
(EDFA). The channel section consists of Single Mode Fiber (SMF) and Fiber Brags
Grating (FBG) with different dispersion values. In the receiver section, PIN receiver
has been used having quantum efficiency of 70%. The dark current is set at
0.1nA.Wavelength of sources are set to 1551 nm and dispersion is varied from 0 to 4
ps/nm/km and optical spectrum is observed. Each channel is set to central wavelength
1550nm firstly for equal channel spacing of 0.2nm and then unequal spacing of 0.1,
50 100 150
0
10
20
30
40
50
Length of the fiber
Qua
lity
Fac
tor
BER
Quality Factor
57
0.2, 0.1, 0.2 nm respectively. Optical spectrum and eye diagram are observed for
equal and unequal spacing keeping dispersion constant.
Fig 4.47 Simulation Setup of Four Wave Mixing (FWM)
Simulation Results
The observed input optical spectrum shown in Figure 4.48.
Fig 4.48 Input spectrum
58
Figure 4.49 to 4.54 show the output spectrum with varying dispersion values from
1ps/nm/km to 6ps/nm/km. It is observed that as the dispersion increases, the effects of
FWM is minimized.
Figure 4.49 Output spectrum dispersion value=1ps/nm/km
Figure 4.50 Output spectrum dispersion value=2ps/nm/km
59
Figure 4.51 Output spectrum dispersion value=3ps/nm/km
Figure 4.52 Output spectrum dispersion value =4ps/nm/km
60
Figure 4.53 Output spectrum dispersion value =5ps/nm/km
Figure4.54 Output spectrum dispersion value =6ps/nm/km
61
Eye Diagram
Figure 4.55 shows the eye diagram of the system with equal channel spacing and is
observed that eye is fully closed with no opening.
Figure4.55 Equal channel spacing
Figure 4.56 shows the eye diagram of the system with unequal channel spacing and is
observed that both upper lid and lower lid are nicely suppressed and eye opening is
wider
Figure4.56 Unequal channel spacing
62
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
There are many techniques that can be utilized to compensate dispersion in an
optical fiber communication link. When the transmission distance increases up to
140km in DWDM networks, dispersion increases and the Bit Error Rate is high
and therefore Q-factor is poor. To overcome this problem, various dispersion
compensation techniques are dealt. Fiber Bragg Grating is a very compact device
with low insertion loss and compensates dispersion by compressing the pulse
which passes through it. This achieved wider eye opening at a transmission
distance upto 50km.Another technique, Electronic equalizer used in Electronic
Dispersion Compensation (EDC) makes use of feed forward equalizer to
compensate dispersion upto 70km of transmission distance.
Optical filters such as fabry-perot and lorentzian filter are considered for
dispersion compensation as they are capable of providing both fixed and tuneable
compensation of dispersion for DWDM systems. This technique achieved the
transmission distance upto 70km. Dispersion compensating fiber are be the best
technique for dispersion compensation for long haul applications. DCF achieved
maximum transmission distance upto 140km and bit error rate is very low
(BER=0) and provides better Q-factor (1410). On reaching transmission distance
greater than 200km, placing a DCF (Pre or post compensation techniques) for
every 100km provides better compensation.
Non linear effect-cross phase modulation is analyzed for various fiber length
and the fiber dispersion value was varied from -1 to -8 ps/nm/km through
parametric runs. It is observed that BER is constant and Q-factor has increased.
Further it is observed that XPM is reduced with increase in dispersion.
The effect of self phase modulation is reduced by varying the dispersion value
from 10 to -10 ps/nm/km through parametric runs. These effects are seen in the eye
63
diagrams for the different values of dispersion. It is observed that BER is constant
and Quality Factor is varying nonlinearly.
FWM generates additional noise and degrades system performance. By
varying the dispersion from 0 to 4 ps/nm/km we observed effect of dispersion on
FWM. Also effect of equal and unequal spacing on FWM is observed. For the
DWDM system with fiber having dispersion value of 4 ps/nm/km, if unequal
spacing is used among channels, FWM effect is suppressed.
64
CHAPTER 6
REFERENCES
[1] T. Ilavarasan, M. Meenakshi, ―An overview of fiber dispersion and nonlinearity
compensation techniques in optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
systems‖, Journal of optics(Springer), Accepted: 31 March 2015.
[2] R. Hemalatha, R. Mahalakshmi, R. Shobana, ―Performance Analysis of Hybrid
TDM/DWDM Optical Communication System in the Presence of FWM and ASE
Noise‖, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, ISSN 0973-4562 Vol.
9 No. 21, 2014.
[3] Sorin Tibuleac and Mark Filer, ―Transmission Impairments in DWDM Networks
with Reconfigurable Optical Add-Drop Multiplexers‖ IEEE Journal of Light wave
Technology, vol.28, pp- 557-568, 2010.
[4] Ajeet Singh Verma, A.K.Jaiswal, Mukesh Kumar, ―An Improved Methodology for
Dispersion Compensation and Synchronization in Optical Fiber Communication
Networks‖, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced
Engineering, Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2013.
[5] Yuan Li, Wei Li, Haoran Cheng, Zhaoyong Zhang, Youwen Fan, Zhixue He,
Shaohua Yu, ‖Fiber nonlinearity suppression in fiber-optic transmission systems using
an optical quadratic Phase Pre-compensation method‖, Journal of optics (Springer)
Vol.10, No.3, November 2013.
[6] Kaushal Kumar, A.K.Jaiswal, MukeshKumar, NileshAgrawal, ―Performance
Analysis of dispersion compensation using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) in Optical
Communication‖ International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology Vol.4,
No.3, June 2014.
[7] Sheetala, A.K. Sharma, R.S. Kaler, ―Simulation of high capacity 40 Gb/s long
haul DWDM system using different modulation formats and dispersion compensation
schemes in the presence of Kerr’s effect‖, Optik 121, pp- 739–749, 2010.
65
[8] Priyanka ,Dalotra, Hardeep Singh, “Effect of Chromatic Dispersion on FWM in
Optical WDM Transmission System‖ International Journal of Advanced Research in
Computer and Communication Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 6, June 2013.
[9] Reena Antil, Pinki, Mrs. Sonal Beniwal, ―An Overview of DWDM Technology &
Network‖ International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 1, Issue
11, December 2012.
[10] Yuan Li, Wei Li, Haoran Cheng, Zhaoyong Zhang, Youwen Fan, Zhixue He,
Shaohua Yu, ―Fiber nonlinearity suppression in fiber-optic transmission systems using
an optical quadratic phase pre-compensation method‖ Journal of optics(Springer)
Vol.10,No.3,November 2013.
[11] Dabhade S.S, Bhosale S, ―Fiber bragg grating and optical phase conjugator as
Dispersion Compensator‖, International Journal of Advanced Electrical and
Electronics Engineering, vol 1(1), pp-15–19, 2012.
[12] S. Singh, R.S. Kaler, ―Comparison of pre, post and symmetrical compensation
for 96 channel DWDM system using PDCF and PSMF‖, Optik-Internationl. J. Light
Electron Opt. 124(14), pp-1808–1813, 2013.
[13] Pardeep Kumar Jindal, Baljinder Kaur, Navdeep Bansal, ―Self Phase
Modulation Reduction for WDM Transmission using EDFA‖, International Journal of
Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM), Volume 2, Issue
12, December 2013.
[14] Gouri Deshmukh, Santosh Jagtap, ― Four Wave Mixing In DWDM Optical
System‖, International Journal of Computational Engineering Research,Vol, 03,
Issue.6.
[15] Edem Ibragimov, ―Limits of Optical Dispersion Compensation Using Linear
Electrical Equalizer‖, IEEE Photonic Technology Letters, Vol.18, No.13, July 1,
2006.
[16] Mehtab Singh, ―Different Dispersion Compensation Techniques in Fiber Optic
Communication System : A Survey‖ International Journal of Advanced Research in
66
Electronics and Communication Engineering (IJARECE), Volume 4, Issue 8, August
2015.
[17] N. K. Kahlon and G. Kaur, ―Various Dispersion Compensation Techniques for
Optical System‖, Journal Of Communications And Software Volume 1, Number 1,
May 2014.
[18] C.K. Madsen, J.A. Walker, J.E. Ford, K.W. Goossen, T.N. Nielsen, and G. Lenz,
―A Tunable Dispersion Compensating MEMS All-Pass Filter,‖ IEEE Photonics
Technology Letter, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 651-653, 2000.
[19] R. Pawase, et al., ―Dispersion post compensation using DCF at 10Gbps‖,Global
Journal of Computer Science and Technology volume 11 ,issue 3 ,version 1.0, 2011.
[20] Gaurang.H.Patel, Rohit.B.Patel, Sweta.J.Patel ―Dispersion Compensation In 40
Gb/S Wdm Network Using Dispersion Compensating Fiber‖ Journal of Information
Knowledge And Research In Electronics And Communication Engineering, ISSN:
0975 – 6779,Nov 12 To Oct 13 ,Volume – 02, Issue – 02.
67
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
Presented a paper titled ―Analysis of Dispersion Compensation Techniques and
Fiber Non linear Effects in DWDM optical networks‖ in IEEE Sponsored 3rd
International Conference on Innovations in Information Embedded and
Communication Systems on 17th
and18th
March 2016 at Karpagam College of
Engineering, Coimbatore.
The paper is accepted to be published in a Scopus Indexed (Anna University
Annexure-II) Journal, Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology (S.no: 15755, Print
ISSN: 18121837, University of Sindh).