Upload
orrin
View
44
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Analysis of diesel engine combustion using imaging and blind source separation . K. Bizon 1 , S. Lombardi 1 , G. Continillo 1,2 , E. Mancaruso 2 , B. M. Vaglieco 2 1 Università del Sannio , Benevento, Italy 2 Istituto Motori C.N.R , Naples , Italy. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ANALYSIS OF DIESEL ENGINE COMBUSTION USING IMAGING AND BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION
K. Bizon1, S. Lombardi1, G. Continillo1,2, E. Mancaruso2, B. M. Vaglieco2
1 Università del Sannio, Benevento, Italy2 Istituto Motori C.N.R, Naples, Italy
OUTLINE
Introduction Experimental setup & procedure Independent component analysis Analysis of crank-angle resolved measurements Cycle-to-cycle variations analysis Comparison with other methods Summary & conclusions
OBJECTIVE OF THE WORK
First attempt of application of independent component analysis (ICA) to 2D images of combustion-related luminosity acquired from an optically accessible Diesel engine
Identification of the leading independent structures (independent components, ICs) and: study of the transient behavior of the flame during a
single cycle analysis of the cycle-to-cycle variability
Assessment of the alternative decompositions (e.g. proper orthogonal decomposition, POD)
INTRODUCTION The fast development of optical systems has made
available measurements of distributed in-cylinder variables but the measurements interpretation is not always easy due to the huge amount of data, and to the variety of coupled phenomena taking place in the combustion chamber
This has lead to the increasing interest in the application of sophisticated mathematical tools, e.g. proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) has become a popular reduction and analysis tool. It has contributed to the knowledge of many physical phenomena, but it cannot separate independent structures, i.e. all POD modes contain some element of all structures found in all of the fields
Alternative decompositions can be considered, e.g. independent component analysis (ICA) can be expected to provide a more powerful insight with respect to POD
OUTLINE
Introduction Experimental setup & procedure Independent component analysis Analysis of crank-angle resolved measurements Cycle-to-cycle variations analysis Comparison with other methods Summary & conclusions
EXPERIMENTAL ENGINE Direct injection four-stroke diesel engine with a single cylinder
and a multi-valve production head The research engine features only two valves and utilizes a
classic extended piston with a UV grade crown windowSingle cylinder diesel engine
Engine type 4-strokeBore 8.5 cmStroke 9.2 cmSwept volume 522 cm3
CC volume 21 cm3
Compression ratio 17,7:1Common rail injection system
Injector type Solenoid drivenNozzle Microsac, single
guideHoles
number6
Cone angle 148°Hole
diameter
0.145 mm
Rated flow 400 cm3/30 s
OPTICAL SETUP
High-speed digital complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera, controlled by a trigger signal generated by a delay unit linked to the engine encoder, in combination with a 45° UV/visible mirror located inside the piston
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE & RESULTS Engine speed of 1000 rpm, continuous-
mode operation, using commercial Diesel fuel Injection pressure fixed at 600 bar and no
EGR Typical CR injection strategy of pre, main
and post injections (PMP) starting at -9°, -4° and 11° CA with duration of 400, 625 and 340 μs
Cylinder pressure recorded at 0.1 CA° increments by means of a pressure transducer
ROHR calculated using the first law, perfect gasapproach
CMOS high-speed camera: frame rate of 4 kHz and exposure time of 166 μs
888 images of the in-cylinder luminosity field, collected from -4° to 30.5° CA, with CA increment of 1.5°, over N= 37 consecutive fired cycles
The original spatial mesh of 529×147 is clipped to 120×120 pixels framing the combustion chamber
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40Crank angle [degrees]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Com
bust
ion
pres
sure
[bar
]
0
10
20
30
Driv
e cu
rren
t [A
mpe
re]
0
40
80
120
160
Rat
e O
f Hea
t Rel
ease
[kJ/
kg/°]
OUTLINE
Introduction Experimental setup & procedure Independent component analysis Analysis of crank-angle resolved measurements Cycle-to-cycle variations analysis Comparison with other methods Summary & conclusions
POD VS. ICAProper orthogonal
decompositon Extracts dominant structures -
orthonormal and optimal in the L2 sense
Relatively simple eigenvalue problem to solve
Fields of application: turbulent flows, model reduction, image processing, PIV data & flame luminosity from SI & Diesel engines
Independent component analysis
Extracts a set of mutually independent signals from the mixture of signals, i.e. permits to separate the data into underlying informational components
Optimization problem maximizing some measure of the independence
Fields of application: neuroimaging, spectroscopy, combustion engines (separation of vibration sources)
POD VS. ICAProper orthogonal
decompositon Extracts dominant structures -
orthonormal and optimal in the L2 sense
Relatively simple eigenvalue problem to solve
Fields of application: turbulent flows, model reduction, image processing, PIV data & flame luminosity from SI & Diesel engines
Independent component analysis
Extracts a set of mutually independent signals from the mixture of signals, i.e. permits to separate the data into underlying informational components
Optimization problem maximizing some measure of the independence
Fields of application: neuroimaging, spectroscopy, combustion engines (separation of vibration sources)
Given: : random vector of temporal mixtures : temporal (mutually independent) source
signals
The mixing model can be written as:
If then matrix is invertible and the model can be rewritten as:
The ICA problem consist of calculating such that is an optimal estimation of
ICA problem can be solved by maximization of the statistical independence of the estimates
ICA: DEFINITION
1 , , mt x t x t x
1 , , nt s t s t s
x = As
n m A
s = Wx1W = A y = Wx
s
y
ICA: APPROACHES
Maximization of nongaussianity (“nongaussian is independent”) Maximization of kurtosis (e.g. a fast-point algorithm
using kurtosis called FastICA) Maximization of negentropy (normalized version of
differential information entropy)
Minimization of mutual information Maximum likelihood estimation Tensorial methods Nonlinear decorrelation and nonlinear PCA
ICA: FASTICA ALGORITHM FastICA algorithm maximizes non-gaussianity by means
of a gradient method. The (non-)gaussianity is estimated by the absolute value of kurtosis defined as:
The algorithm is employed on centered (having zero mean) and whitened data (uncorrelated and have unit variances), i.e.:
- raw data - POD eigenvectors - POD eigenvalues (on the diagonal) If the number of ICs is smaller than the number mixtures,
the data can be reduced during the whitening using leading POD modes
1 2 T E x = D E x x
24 2kurt 3y E y E y
xED
n m
ICA: SEPARATION OF IMAGE MIXTUREsources
independentcomponents
POD modes
mixtures
mixing
separation
OUTLINE
Introduction Experimental setup & procedure Independent component analysis Analysis of crank-angle resolved measurements Cycle-to-cycle variations analysis Comparison with other methods Summary & conclusions
CRANK ANGLE RESOLVED MEASUREMENTS PMP at -9°, -4° and 11° CA
first luminous spots due to
ignition of the preinjected fuel
main injection combustion
combustion present on all jets and in the vicinity of the chamber wall
combustion zone moves
towards the bowl
wall
simultaneous ignition of
postinjection jets
maximum of post
combustion luminosity
Images of combustion luminosity for multiple injections in a cycle, at several crank angles
ICA: CYCLE 8
y1 y2
ICA: CYCLE 9
y1 y2
ANALYSIS OF ICS AND THEIR COEFFICIENTS
2° CA 9.5° CA5° CA 2° CA 9.5° CA5° CA
y1: combustion along the fuel jets; swirl
motiony2: combustion near the chamber wallsy1 y2 y1 y2
ICS VS. ENGINE PARAMETERS
SOC of PMP: –4°, 1° & 14°
CA
main inj. post inj.
maximum luminosity of the regular
combustion process near the fuel jets of the main and post
injection
3.5° CA 17° CA
8° CA
OUTLINE
Introduction Experimental setup & procedure Independent component analysis Analysis of crank-angle resolved measurements Cycle-to-cycle variations analysis Comparison with other methods Summary & conclusions
CYCLE-TO-CYCLE VARIATIONS
Not all jets burn with the same flame behavior; during combustion development flames are unevenly distributed along the jets’ axes
Post injection starts in a partly burning environment, where the irregular peripheral combustion influences post-injection ignition
2° CA
3.5° CA
14° CA
18.5° CA
main injection combustion
end of main
combustion;
post injection
post injection
combustion
3.5°CA
ICA separates the mean combustion luminosity at each CA from the irregular flame structure related to cycle variability
14°CA
Separation is worse when the variability is higher, i.e. at the end of main combustion when the flames move randomly near the bowl wall
18.5°CA
Again, the separation is better when the cyclic variability is lower, i.e. for the CA characterized by regular combustion typical of jet burning
ICS VS. ENGINE PARAMETERS
a1 peaks where an irregular combustion process takes place (less effective separation) and is low when the burning along the jets dominates
CV of a2 is at least one order of magnitude higher than the CV of a1, confirming that strong deviations from the ideal combustion process are located near the bowl wall
pilot injection
fuel burning in the centre of the bowl
regular burning of the main &
post injection fuel along the jet directions
random flames
near the bowl
irregular end of
combustion
OUTLINE
Introduction Experimental setup & procedure Independent component analysis Analysis of crank-angle resolved measurements Cycle-to-cycle variations analysis Comparison with other methods Summary & conclusions
ICA VS. POD
Independent
components
POD modes
Negentropy, i.e. normalized differential information entropy, measures the amount of information and is always higher for ICA than for POD; it is estimated as:
1 2 1 2
2 23
;1 1 kurt12 48
ICA PODJ J y J y J J J
J y E y y
ICA VS. 1ST AND 2ND MOMENT
Analysis of cycle variations (but not crank angle resolved measurements!) similar conclusions for the first two statistical moments (mean & standard deviation)
Here the "signals" were, in most cases, already spatially separated
Independent
components
1st and 2nd moment
Crank angle resolved measurments
Cycyle-to-cycle variations
OUTLINE
Introduction Experimental setup & procedure Independent component analysis Analysis of crank-angle resolved measurements Cycle-to-cycle variations analysis Comparison with other methods Summary & conclusions
SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS A first attempt of the application of ICA to luminosity image
data collected in an optical engine was done Two independent components were found related to:
combustion along the fuel jets presenting low variability over the cycles
near the bowl walls – highly variable; this confirms quantitatively that strong deviations from the ideal combustion process are located near the bowl walls
The analysis is fast and reliable - a single computation takes less than 0.1 s on a standard sequential single processor
Benefits of ICA can be much higher than this simple application example shows. Based on the demonstration case, more complex data can be analyzed, and what was presented here is a first and convincing example of how ICA works in an engine context
From the movie L’Atalante by Jean Vigo (1932)Dita Parlo (born as Gerda Olga Justine Kornstädt on 4th Sept 1908 in Szczecin, Poland