Upload
barrie-cooper
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Analysis of 2 Styles of Homebrew Antennas
Electromagnetic theory basics
• Classic Dipole Analysis
How big should our antennas be?
• frequency range 2.45GHz
• Lambda * frequency = speed of light– Lambda = (3e8m/s)/(2.45e9s^-1)
• Lambdba = 0.122m or 4.8in
The “Cantenna”
• The first type of antenna and very common in the Homebrew world is the can-based antenna or cantenna.
• Fabrication Parts– Can
– Piece of standard 50ohm wire– N-type connector
Fabrication leads to:
So what does a cantenna radiation beam look like?
Printed Dipole Array
• This uses antenna strip idea as opposed to hollow conductive waveguides to do its work.
• Fabrication– Glass substrate– Adhesive copper roll– Vinyl cutter
Fabrication leads to
Recognizing the dipole array
• multiple dipoles squeezing beam and increasing gain
Dipole Array E&M field patterns
Why the tapered feed line (balun)?
• Balance/unbalance transmission line for VSWR characteristics
The Printed Dipole Array Antenna beam?
Which is the better antenna?
VS.
Top of vassar parking structure
Field Testing
• Duplicate parameters of cantenna test found online and compare results– 1320ft Line of Sight distance– Standard dipole on AP/Source/tx– Laptop using plug-in card for destination/rcvr
1320 ft
Access Point/source
Laptop
w/card
Roof of my home
Cantenna test results
• http://home.carolina.rr.com/harothberg/Test2.htm
• Control: only using pc and wireless card– Signal Level: -89dBm -> 1.26e-12W
• Actual test: using can design– Signal Level: -68dBm -> 1.58e-10W
• dBi = log[base 10](P1/P2)– 2.1dBi when compared to power from card
Printed Dipole Array Test Setup• Views from Source/AP and Destination/Laptop
1320 ft: AP on home roof
1320 ft: laptop site on Vassar parking
Printed Dipole Array Test Results• Control: only using pc and wireless card
– Signal Strength Level: -91dB• Actual test: using printed dipole array design
– Signal Strength Level: -65dB• dBi = log[base 10](P1/P2)
– 2.6dBi when compared to power from card
Wireless Card
Printed Dipole Array
Test Results Findings
• Absolutes [Cantenna vs. P.D.]• Antenna Strength: 2.1dBi vs. 2.6dBi
• Surprise results of holding P.D antenna with and without one’s hand:– An unintended experiment happened as the antenna
was being tested. One test run involved me holding the antenna with my hand (accidentally), while the other involved me holding the antenna in a nonconducting paper bag.
• Antenna gain showed a relative increase of +9dB in the signal when no hands were used to hold the antenna. That is a 3 time doubling of power in the signal. These results simply stress the significant affect biological contact can have on performance and points to better ways of insulating the printed dipole antenna from conductive influences.
The better antenna, based on analysis:
• Gain/power and coverage– P.D.: 3 dipoles focused in 1D
• great gain and coverage, good for community setting
– Can: has 1 dipole that is focused in 2D• okay on gain, low on coverage, good for point to point
• Fabrication – P.D.: mass production easier– Can: one-off production easier
• Portability– P.D.: low profile(2D), lightweight, durable– Can: bulky(3D), lightweight, durable