ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF A (G+4) BUILDI NG€¦ · of a Structure designed using STAAD and ETABS Software,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, Volume 2

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET)Volume 8, Issue 5, May 2017, pp.

Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.

ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976

© IAEME Publication

ANALYSIS AND

Final year B.Tech, Department of Civil Engineering K L University,



Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering K L University, A.P., India

ABSTRACT

This paper presents (G+4)

considered 23.39m * 8.72m

earthquake using ETABS, Software used for analyse auditorium, residential and

industrial structure and this

the building at the seismic zone

Shear force, Max, Min Bending moments, Max, Min storey displacements.

Key words: Seismic analysis

Cite this Article: S.Venugopal, K.Dileep Kumar, Shubham Singh and

N.Lingeshwaran Analysis and Design of A (G+4) Building

Civil Engineering and Technology

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=5

1. PROJECT DETAILS

1. Type of the building: Residential

2. Shape of the building: Regular (

3. No. of stories: (G+4)

4. Type of wall: Brick wall

5. Height of stories: 3m

2. INTRODUCTION

Due to increasing in the population constructing number of stories in present dec

leads to the structure analysed as wind and earthquake

IJCIET/index.asp 260 [email protected]

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) 2017, pp.260–266, Article ID: IJCIET_08_05_029


6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316

Scopus Indexed

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF A (G+4) BUILDI

S.Venugopal

.Tech, Department of Civil Engineering K L University,

K.Dileep Kumar


Shubham Singh


N.Lingeshwaran


presents (G+4) Storey RCC Moment resist Framed building,

considered 23.39m * 8.72m analysed and designed with lateral loading effect of

ABS, Software used for analyse auditorium, residential and

his live project is mainly deals with structural behaviours of

seismic zone IV and medium soil condition, To find the


eismic analysis, Plan Complexity, Structural designing and d

S.Venugopal, K.Dileep Kumar, Shubham Singh and

N.Lingeshwaran Analysis and Design of A (G+4) Building. International

Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 2017, pp. 260–266.


PROJECT DETAILS

esidential

egular (rectangular)

Due to increasing in the population constructing number of stories in present dec

analysed as wind and earthquake is need in present scenario, the

[email protected]

asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=5

BUILDING

.Tech, Department of Civil Engineering K L University, A.P., India.




Framed building,

analysed and designed with lateral loading effect of

ABS, Software used for analyse auditorium, residential and

mainly deals with structural behaviours of

o find the Max, Min


designing and detailing.

S.Venugopal, K.Dileep Kumar, Shubham Singh and

International Journal of


Due to increasing in the population constructing number of stories in present decades which

is need in present scenario, the


detailing the beam, column, footing as per IS 456:2000 and compare the res

manually and excel sheets. Structure

directions due to the ground motions and the analyses parts to find the basic needs of SFD

and BMD and to resists the earthquake

3. ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT

4. GENERAL CONDITIONS O

• Area: Karnataka

• Soil type: Medium stiff

• Temperature: 29ºC

• Humidity: 18-22%

• Topography: 600 –

• Zone: IV

• Zone factor: 0.24

• Response Reduction Factor, R: 3.0 (Ordinary RC moment

• A four-floor Residential building of symmetrical plan.

Analysis and Design of A (G+4) Building


tailing the beam, column, footing as per IS 456:2000 and compare the res

manually and excel sheets. Structure behaviours means lateral displacement in X, Y, Z


resists the earthquake resistant design of structures. This project

ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT

Figure 1 Plan

GENERAL CONDITIONS OF AREA OF CONSTRUCTI

Medium stiff soil

29ºC

22%

– 900 Meters

Response Reduction Factor, R: 3.0 (Ordinary RC moment-resisting frame)

floor Residential building of symmetrical plan.

[email protected]

tailing the beam, column, footing as per IS 456:2000 and compare the results with

behaviours means lateral displacement in X, Y, Z


ctures. This project

F AREA OF CONSTRUCTION

resisting frame)

S.Venugopal, K.Dileep Kumar, Shubham Singh and N.Lingeshwaran

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 262 [email protected]

5. DESIGN PROCEDURE IN ETABS

5.1. Material properties

To carry out the work in ETABS software the properties of the materials such as concrete and

steel should be defined and the loads such as live load, dead load, Earthquake loads & wind

loads.

• Grade of concrete: M20

• Grade of steel: Fe 415N/mm2

• Live loads: 2kN/m2

• SDL (floor finish): 1.5kN/m2

• SDL (wall loads inner and outer respectively): 6.21kN/m2 and 12.45kN/m

2

• Beam size: 230 x 450 mm

• Column size: 230 x 450 mm

Enter Grid data and Story Data Define Material Properties

Define Frame Sections Define Slab Sections

Define Load Cases Draw Columns

Draw beams (Frame Members) Draw Slab Sections

Assign Restrains Assign Live Loads and Floor Finish to slabs

Assign Diaphragm Assign Wall Loads

Assign Earth quake loads Run the Analysis

Perform Concrete Frame Design


5.2. Centre line diagram

5.3. Description of loads

• All moving loads come under live

Live load (on floors): 2

Live load (on roof): 1kN/m

• Floor finishes are the super imposed dead loads.

Floor Finishes (on floors): 1.5

Floor Finishes (on roof):

• Wall loads are the loads of bricks used in construction.

For 9” wall (outer wall):

brick = 0.23*3*18)

For 4.5” wall (inner wall):

brick = 0.115*3*18)

• Earthquake loads are given so that the building shall be earthquake resistant.

Zone: IV (According to the present zoning map, Zone 5 expects the highest level of

seismicity whereas Zone 2 is associated with the lowest level of seismicity.)

Zone factor: 0.24

Soil type: II (medium stiff soil)

Importance factor I =

ordinary moment resisting frame



Figure 2 line diagram

under live loads.

: 2kN/m2, (IS 875:2002)

kN/m2, (IS 875:2002)

Floor finishes are the super imposed dead loads.

Floor Finishes (on floors): 1.5kN/m2

Floor Finishes (on roof): 2kN/m2

are the loads of bricks used in construction.

For 9” wall (outer wall): 12.45kN/m2 (wall thickness*height of the floor*density of

For 4.5” wall (inner wall): 6.21kN/m2 (wall thickness*height of the floor*density of

Earthquake loads are given so that the building shall be earthquake resistant.

According to the present zoning map, Zone 5 expects the highest level of


Soil type: II (medium stiff soil)

Importance factor I = 1.0 (as residential building the building is proposed to have

moment resisting frame.

[email protected]

(wall thickness*height of the floor*density of

(wall thickness*height of the floor*density of

Earthquake loads are given so that the building shall be earthquake resistant.

According to the present zoning map, Zone 5 expects the highest level of


g is proposed to have

S.Venugopal, K.Dileep Ku


6. RESULTS

Initially the plan was analysed as

columns were failed after the analysis.

the failures. The failure was gradually reduced as the

Later at the section C230x750 and with the change o

found safe with no failures. (1

and also their local axes was changed from 90



Figure 3 Assigning of loads

analysed as it is given by the architect but it was

columns were failed after the analysis. Then the trial and error method was followed to rectify

the failures. The failure was gradually reduced as the depth of the column was increased.

Later at the section C230x750 and with the change of orientation of column the structure was

(1-A and 1-D columns were changed from 230x450 to 230x750

and also their local axes was changed from 900 to 0

0)

Figure 4 Deflection details

mar, Shubham Singh and N.Lingeshwaran

[email protected]

observed that two

Then the trial and error method was followed to rectify

of the column was increased.

f orientation of column the structure was

D columns were changed from 230x450 to 230x750




Figure 5 Shear force details

Figure 6 Bending moment details

[email protected]


http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 266 [email protected]

Figure 7 Diaphgram details

8. CONCLUSIONS

Our project deals with provision of earthquake resistant structure which is also economic. The

load was increased gradually from top floor to bottom floor. Minimum sizes of the beams and

columns were provided and after analysis only the failed column axes and dimensions were

changed so that the building would be economic.

REFERENCES

[1] Poonam, Anil Kumar and A. K. Gupta, “Study of Response of Structural Irregular

Building Frames to Seismic Excitations,” International Journal of Civil, Structural,

Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering Research and Development, Vol.2, Issue 2

(2012) 25-31.

[2] B. K. Sanghani and P. G. Patel, “Behaviour of Building Component in Various Zones,”

International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences, Vol. 1, Issue 1(Jan. 2011).

[3] P. Prashanth, S. Anshuman, R.K. Pandey, Herbert Arpan, “Comparison of design results

of a Structure designed using STAAD and ETABS Software,” INTERNATIONAL

JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, Volume 2, No 3, 2012.

[4] Salahuddin Hammad, Habib Saqib, Rehman Talha , “Comparison of design of a building

using ETABS V 9.5 & STAAD PRO,” 2005.

[5] Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-875, part 1 (1987), Dead Loads on Buildings and

Structures, New Delhi, India.

[6] IS: 875-1987. ‘Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads (other than

Earthquakes) for Buildings an Structures, (2nd revision).’ Bureau of Indian Standard,

New Delhi.

[7] IS: 456-2000. ‘Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design of reinforced concrete”,

Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.

[8] Design of Reinforced concrete structures by S. Ramamrutham and R. Narayanan, 17 th

edition Dhanpat Rai Publishing Company.

[9] User manual for E tabs.

[10] A Sathawane R.S Deotale 'Analysis and design of flat and grid slab and their comparision,

international journal of engineering Research and their applications vol 1. Issue.3.PP 837-

848.

Documents

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF A (G+4) BUILDI NG€¦ · of a Structure designed using STAAD and ETABS Software,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, Volume 2