15
Analogies amongst vector bundles on G /B and Abelian varieties Nathan Grieve

Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B

and Abelian varieties

Nathan Grieve

Page 2: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Cup-product problems on projective varieties

Q: Suppose that L and M are line bundles on a projectivevariety X . What can we say about the cup-product map

Hp(X , L)⊗ Hq(X ,M)∪−→ Hp+q(X , L⊗M)?

For instance is it nonzero?

Special case: Suppose that L and M are positive powers of avery ample line bundle A on X . Cup-product maps of the form:

H0(X ,A⊗m)⊗ H0(X ,A⊗n)∪−→ H0(X ,A⊗m+n)

are related to the syzygies of X .

In general: When p, q > 0 we should place conditions on L,M , and L⊗M to ensure that the cohomology groupsHp(X , L), Hq(X ,M), and Hp+q(X , L⊗M) are non-zero.

Page 3: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Mumford’s index theorem

Theorem (Mumford). Let L be a line bundle on an abelianvariety X and assume that its Euler characteristic χ(L) isnonzero. The following assertions hold:

I there exists a unique integer i(L) s.t. Hi(L)(X , L) 6= 0;

I if A is an ample line bundle, then the polynomialP(N) := χ(AN ⊗ L) has real roots and i(L) equals thenumber of positive roots counted with multiplicity

I Hi(L)(X , L) is the unique irreducible weight onerepresentation of the theta group of L.

Remark: An almost identical statement holds for a certainclass of simple vector bundles on X . (This follows from workof Mumford, and Mukai. See my [-, Ann. Math. Que., Toappear].)

Page 4: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Example: Let E be an elliptic curve and X = E × E .

Let x ∈ E , let f1 = {x} × E , let f2 = E × {x}, let ∆ denotethe diagonal, and let γ = f1 + f2 −∆.

The numerical classes of f1, f2, and γ span a three dimensionalsubspace of N1(X )R the real Neron-Severi space of X :

H 0

H 2

H1

ab − c2 = 0

If χ(L) 6= 0 and L has numerical class af1 + bf2 + cγ then

i(L) =

8

>

<

>

:

0 iff ab − c2 > 0 and a + b > 0

1 iff ab − c2 < 0

2 iff ab − c2 > 0 and a + b < 0.

Remark: The index of line bundles with non-vanishing Eulercharacteristic is constant on the connected components of theopen subset of N1(X )R determined by the non-vanishing of χ.

Page 5: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem

Set-up:

I G is a semi-simple complex algebraic group

I T ⊆ G a maximal torus

I B ⊆ G a Borel subgroup containing T

I Λ = Hom(T ,C×) the weight lattice

I W = NG (T )/ZG (T ) the Weyl group

I Λ+ the collection of dominant integral weights

A key point: Under the dot action of W on Λ, Λ+

decomposes as a disjoint union:

W · Λ+ = tw∈Ww · Λ+

Page 6: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

A weight λ ∈ Λ is said to be regular if λ ∈ W · Λ+.Since

W · Λ+ = tw∈Ww · Λ+,

if λ is regular then λ ∈ w · Λ+ for some unique w ∈ W .

Let X = G/B , suppose that λ ∈ Λ, and suppose that Lλ is theline bundle on X with total space G ×B C−λ.

Theorem (Borel-Weil-Bott). If λ is regular, then

Hi(X , Lλ) =

{V ∗w ·λ if i = `(w) and λ ∈ w−1 · Λ+

0 otherwise.

If λ is not regular, then Hi(X , Lλ) = 0 for all i .

Page 7: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Example: Consider the case:

X = SL3(C)/B = {(p, `) ∈ P2 × P2∗ : p ∈ `}.I standard simple roots of sl3(C):

α1 = ε1 − ε2, and α2 = ε2 − ε3I weight lattice: Λ = spanZ{λ1, λ2}, where

λ1 =2

3α1 +

1

3α2 and λ2 =

1

3α1 +

2

3α2.

I dominant integral weights: Λ+ = spanZ≥0{λ1, λ2}

H 0

H 1

H 1

H 2H 3

H 2

B-W-B theorem for X = SL3(C)/B

S3 = W = 〈σα1 , σα2 〉 ⊆ GL(ΛR)

ρ = λ1 + λ2

σ · λ = σ(λ + ρ) − ρ

Page 8: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Cup-product problems on abelian varieties

Let X be an abelian variety, and fix line bundles L and M onX satisfying the conditions that:

I χ(L) 6= 0, χ(M) 6= 0, and χ(L⊗M) 6= 0 and

I i(L⊗M) = i(L) + i(M).

The cup-product problems that we want to study have theform:

Hi(L)(X , L)⊗ Hi(M)(X ,M)∪−→ Hi(L⊗M)(X , L⊗M).

In general such maps can be zero, but their asymptoticbehaviour is more uniform.

Page 9: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Theorem (-, Int. J. Math., 2014). In the setting justdescribed, there exists an n0 > 0 such that the cup-product

Hi(L)(X ,T ∗x (Ln))⊗ Hi(M)(X ,Mn)∪−→ Hi(L⊗M)(X ,T ∗x (Ln)⊗Mn)

is nonzero and surjective for every n ≥ n0 and every x ∈ X .Equivalently, the vector bundle

Ri(L⊗M)p1∗ ((p1 + p2)∗Ln ⊗ p∗2M

n)

is globally generated for all n ≥ n0.

Page 10: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Remarks.

I The relationship between the family of cup-products

∪(T ∗x L,M), for x ∈ X ,

and the vector bundle

Ri(L⊗M)p1∗ ((p1 + p2)∗L⊗ p∗2M)

generalizes work of Pareschi and Pareschi-Popa wherethey prove and refine a conjecture of Lazarsfeld related tothe property Np for abelian varieties

I More general versions of these results apply to higherrank vector bundles

Page 11: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Existence of nontrivial problems

Using a construction of Shimura and Albert we prove:

Theorem (-, Int. J. Math., 2014). Let p, q ∈ Z≥0 with theproperty that 0 ≤ p + q ≤ g . There exists simple (complex)abelian varieties, of dimension g , which admit line bundles Land M such that:

I χ(L), χ(M), and χ(L⊗M) are nonzero, and

I i(L) = p, i(M) = q, and i(L⊗M) = p + q.

Remark. A more general version works to provide examples ofhigher rank simple vector bundles with similar cohomologicalproperties.

Page 12: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Idea of proof

Important in the proof of our main result, concerning theasymptotic nature of cup-product problems, is:

Theorem (-, Int. J. Math., 2014). Let Y be an abelianvariety. Let L and F denote, respectively, a non-degenerateline bundle and a coherent sheaf on Y . There exists an n0 > 0with the property that, for all isogenies f : X → Y , we have

Hj(X , f ∗(F ⊗ Ln)⊗ α) = 0

for all j > i(L), for all n ≥ n0, and for all α ∈ Pic0(X ).

Corollary (-, Int. J. Math., 2014). If χ(L) 6= 0 andi(L) ≤ q then L is naively q-ample.

Page 13: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Infinite dimensional analogues

Setting of abelian varieties

Fix an abelian variety X and a line bundle L on X .

Consider the polarized tower associated to the pair (X , L):

Xn/m−−→ X

n∗L↔ m∗L

I The data (X , L) determines an adelic theta group G (L)which acts on the direct limit lim

→Hi(X , n∗L)

I If χ(L) 6= 0, then lim→

Hi(L)(X , n∗L) is an irreducible

G (L)-module

I The adelic theta groups G(L) exhibit some functorialproperties which are not shared by the theta groups G(L).(See my [-, Ann. Math. Que., To appear].)

Page 14: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Setting of infinite dimensional Flag varieties

Set-up:

I G is a Kac-Moody group, determined by a generalizedCartan matrix

I B ⊆ G is a standard Borel subgroup

I X = G/BRemarks.

I In general X is an infinite dimensional variety and carriesthe structure of an ind-variety

I When G is determined by an extended Cartan matrix, X isrelated to the moduli space of vector bundles on algebraiccurves with parabolic structure

Page 15: Analogies amongst vector bundles on G/B and Abelian varietiesabelian varieties, of dimension g, which admit line bundles L and M such that: I ˜(L), ˜(M), and ˜(L M) are nonzero,

Regular weights λ of G determine line bundles Lλ on X andthere is a Borel-Weil-Bott type theorem:

If λ ∈ W · Λ+, then

Hi(X, Lλ) =

{V ∗w ·λ if i = `(w) and λ ∈ w−1 · Λ+

0 otherwise.

Q: What kinds of positivity/cohomological results, applicablefor ind-varieties for instance, could be useful in studyingcup-product problems on X?