Anal Disc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Anal Disc

    1/5

    DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

    DISCOURSE AND TEXTS

    STUDENT: ERBAN Edelina-Maria

    COORDONATOR: conf. dr COPOSESCU Liliana

  • 8/13/2019 Anal Disc

    2/5

    DISCOURSE AND TEXTS

    Abstract.This paper is meant as an attempt to show the differences between discourse and texts

    and also to exemplify the cohesive devices (verb form, conjunctions and adverbials, parallelism,

    referring expressions, substitution and ellipsis. In order to do that, I have chosen an article

    composed by me to explain how all these cohesive devices appeared and their role.

    1. Introduction

    Remember that we defined texts earlier as being the verbal record of a communicative event. A

    number of authors have been concerned to provide a more formal account of how speakers of

    English come to identify a text as forming a text (for example, Halliday & Hassan, 1976). They

    are concerned with what binds a text together and force co-interpretation, i.e. what makes them

    to be interpreted in the same way by readers (hearers in the case of spoken texts). Halliday and

    Hassan consider that the primary determinant of whether a set of sentences do or do not

    constitute a text depends on cohesive relationships within and between the sentences, which

    create texture.

    2. Cohesion

    Cohesion refers to facts inside the language and it is achieved through the formal linksthat give

    a sense of unity beyond the sentence. According to Halliday and Hassan (1976) a text is a text

    rather than a mere sequence of sentences. This is due to the linguistic features that cause

    sentences to stick together; i.e. what makes sentences constitute a text depends on cohesive

    relationships within and between sentences which create texture:A text has texture and this

    is what distinguishes it from something that is not a text [...]. The texture is provided by thecohesive relations (1976:2), what makes any length of text meaningful and coherent has been

    termed texture. Texture is the basis for unity and semantic interdependence without text, and

    text without texture would just be a group of isolated sentences with no relation to one another.

    Conjunction

  • 8/13/2019 Anal Disc

    3/5

    A conjunction represents semantic relation that expresses how a clause or statement is related in

    meaning to a previous clause or statement; it is signaled by a specific connecting word or phrase.

    Following is a variety of types of semantic relations with examples of words that typically signal

    each: additive, amplification, adversative, causal, temporal, spatial, example.

    e.g Presbyterians and Methodists and Baptists are the prevalent Protestant congregationsin Oklahoma. A comma is also used with butwhen expressing a contrast: This is a useful

    rule, but difficult to remember.

    The term reference is traditionally used in semantics to define the relationship between a word

    and what it points to in the real world, but in Halliday and Hasans model it simply refers to

    the relationship between two linguistic expressions.

    In the textual sense, though, reference occurs when the reader/listener has to retrieve the

    identity of what is being talked about by referring to another expression in the same context.

    References to the shared world outside a text are called exophoric references.

    References to elements in the text are calledendophoric references.Only the second ones are purely cohesive, although both of them are important to create

    texture.

    There are times when the reference is not explicit in the text itself, but it is obvious to those in

    a particular situation. This is called exophoric reference.

    For he's a jolly good fellow

    And so say all of us.

    As outsiders, we dont know who the heis, but, most likely, the people involved in the

    celebration are aware of the he that is being referred to, and therefore, can find texture in the

    sentences.Another type of reference relation that is not strictly textual is co-reference.A chain of co-referential items such as Mrs Thatcher the Prime Minister The Iron Lady

    Maggie reveals that co-reference is not strictly a linguistic feature but depends on real-world knowledge. You need some external information to realize that the terms refer to the

    same person.

    Lexical

    Textual cohesion between one word and another is created by repetition of the word or use of a

    synonym, a superordinate word, a more general word, or an associated word.Same word: The darkness of night came swiftly. The children were afraid of the darkness.

    Synonym: Hansel and Gretel huddled together to wait for daybreak. Oh, when would dawn

    come?

    Superordinate word:Mice and raccoons snuffled closer to investigate the intruders. The

    animals were curious.

  • 8/13/2019 Anal Disc

    4/5

    General word: Finally, the tired children snuggled down in the leaves and pine needles of

    the forest bed and went to sleep.

    Associated word: As the dawnbroke,sunlight filled the forest.

    Demonstrative reference keeps track of information through location using proximity

    references like this, these, that, those, here, there, then, and the.e.g I always drink a lot of beer when I am in England. There are many lovely pubs there. This

    is not acceptable.

    Substitution

    A word is substituted for the referent that is not identical in meaning or carries some

    differentiation, but performs the same structural function.

    Nominal: The witch wanted a bigger pot. She ordered Gretel to go and get one.

    Clausal: Could Gretel save Hansel? She thought so.

    Ellipsis A word, phrase, or clause is left unsaid, but is understood.

    Verbal: "Are you coming?" called the witch. "I am (coming)," answered Gretel.

    Nominal: Gretel looked for a sharp tool, but she knew she would take whatever

    (tool) she could find.

    Clausal: I know I can kill the witch. I'm sure I can (kill the witch).

    Ellipsis (zero substitution)is the omission of elements normally required by the grammarwhich the speaker/writer assumes are obvious from the context and therefore need not be raised.

    There are three types of ellipsis too: nominal, verbal, and clausal.

    (a) Do you want to hear another song? I know twelve more [songs]

    (b) Sue brought roses and Jackie [brought] lilies.

    (c) I ran 5 miles on the first day and 8 on the second

    Comparisoncompared with in the same way similarly

    in comparison with likewise

    Examples:

  • 8/13/2019 Anal Disc

    5/5

    I used to work fifteen hours a day In comparison withthat, my present job is more like holiday!The doctor advised him to give up smoking. Similarly, he recommended him to eat much less

    and take plenty of exercise.

    Parallelism

    Parallelism suggests a connection, simply because the form of one sentence repeats the form

    of another. It is often used in speeches, prayers, poetry and advertisements because therhythmical repetition of the same structure renders an emotional touch and may also function

    as an aide-memoire.

    e.g Le Generale de Gaulle est mort. La France est veuve.

    e.g Teach us, Good Lord, to give and not to count the cost, to fight and not to heed thewounds, to toil and not to seek for rest, to labour and to ask for no reward, save that of

    knowing that we do Thy will (St. Richards Prayer)

    Conclusion

    What I have tried to do in this paper was to identify and analyze some of the ingredients which

    are necessary in any discourse. We have seen that in order to be able to compose a discourse , weneed to have cohesive devices.

    Finally, since any text needs to be both coherent and cohesive, I have shown how the various

    type of devices employed by the writer contribute to the cohesion of the paragraphs chosen byme.

    References

    Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1989.Discourse Analysis.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.http://percybal.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/cohesive-devices-list-of-items-for-writing-a-

    composition.pdf

    Discourse analysis course. Liliana Coposescu

    http://percybal.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/cohesive-devices-list-of-items-for-writing-a-composition.pdfhttp://percybal.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/cohesive-devices-list-of-items-for-writing-a-composition.pdfhttp://percybal.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/cohesive-devices-list-of-items-for-writing-a-composition.pdfhttp://percybal.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/cohesive-devices-list-of-items-for-writing-a-composition.pdf