Upload
mrunalinikannan
View
1.102
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Anaerobic Waste Water Treatment System
Mrunalini Kannan
2539239
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Cleveland State University
Cleveland, Ohio-44114
EEC 640Spring 2011
04/13/2023 2
Anaerobic Waste Water Treatment System
Anaerobic wastewater treatment is a method for degradation of organic compounds by utilizing the action of anaerobic bacterial flora, which grows in wastewater, at an oxygen-free environment.
For an anaerobic treatment system, pH is an important environmental factor that can influence the activity of anaerobic bacteria.
In the final anaerobic stage process the methane bacteria need optimal pH range from 6.8-7.2
04/13/2023 3
pH Control System
04/13/2023 4
Mathematical Model
04/13/2023 5
Frequency Response Analysis
04/13/2023 6
Frequency Response Analysis
Methods Bode Plot Nyquist Plot
This gives a non-parametric, and model independent characterization of arbitrary order stabilizing controllers.
The result shows the frequency response of any stabilizing controller that must satisfy constraints on its magnitude phase and rate of change of phase at certain frequencies that are imposed by the frequency response .
04/13/2023 7
Continuation
Bode Plot Nyquist Plot
04/13/2023 8
Stability Analysis
The gain margin is 40.0632 and the phase margin is 91.7172.
For a system if both gain margin and phase margin are positive then the system is said to be stable.
The gain margin and phase margin of the anaerobic wastewater treatment system is positive.
Hence the anaerobic wastewater treatment system is stable.
04/13/2023 9
Time Response Analysis
04/13/2023 10
PID Control
Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) control offers the simplest yet most efficient solution to real world control problems.
A proportional-integral-derivative controller is a generic control loop feed-back mechanism widely used in industrial control systems.
PID controller calculates an error value as the difference between a measured process variable and a desired set-point.
The proportional, integral and derivative values can be can be interpreted in terms of time that is P depends on present error, I depend on accumulation of past errors and D is a prediction of future errors based on current rate of change.
04/13/2023 11
Continuation The popularity of PID controllers is due to their functional simplicity and
reliability.
They provide robust and reliable performance for most systems if the PID parameters are determined or tuned to ensure a satisfactory closed-loop performance.
The individual effects of these three terms on the closed-loop performance are summarized.
04/13/2023 12
PID Control
04/13/2023 13
PID Response
04/13/2023 14
Active Disturbance Rejection Control
04/13/2023 15
Estimated Mathematical Model
04/13/2023 16
ADRC Design
04/13/2023 17
Estimated Plant-ADRC Response
04/13/2023 18
Estimated Plant-Observer output
04/13/2023 19
Anaerobic Waste Water Treatment System- Mathematical Model, Parameters
04/13/2023 20
ADRC Design
04/13/2023 21
ADRC Response
04/13/2023 22
Stability Analysis
The stability is given by closed loop transfer function.
04/13/2023 23
Continuation
The characteristic Polynomial is
Coefficients in C(s) and H(s)
04/13/2023 24
Parameters and Transfer Function
The parameters and the transfer function to see the stability of the system is shown
The stability is checked using the bode plot and nyquist plot
04/13/2023 25
Responses/Plots
Bode Nyquist
04/13/2023 26
Gm =4.3420Pm =97.7024⍵gc =142.8642⍵pc =37.7915
Stability Analysis
Since the gain margin is positive the system is stable. The gain cross-over frequency and the phase crossover frequency are also positive. Hence the system is said to be stable.
From the nyquist plot it could be said that the system is stable.
Hence from the frequency response analysis it could be said that the system is stable and robust.
04/13/2023 27
ADRC
WHY?
04/13/2023 28
Comparison of PID and ADRC
PID Simplicity Robustness Not inherent Covers treatment to both transient
and steady state response Applies to linear systems Tuning of three values is difficult Has Maximum overshoot Settles after a long time.
ADRC Simple Robustness against dynamic
variations and external disturbances Inherent due to the fact that
controller is not dependent on accurate mathematical model
Applies generally to non-linear and time varying systems with SISO or MIMO
Tuning a single value is easy Has comparatively less overshoot Settles immediately and has good
settling time
04/13/2023 29
Comparison of PID and ADRC
04/13/2023 30
Victory for ADRC
From the comparative response it is noted that ADRC has less overshoot and good settling time than PID control.
Conclusion
04/13/2023 31
References Cascade Control of the PH in an Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment System Kang
Jiayu,Wang Mengxiao,Mi Linan and Xiao Zhongjun Shannxi University of Science & Technology Xi’an, China.
Implementation of Matlab-SIMULINK Based Real Time Temperature Control for Set Point Changes, Emine Dogru Bolat 5/11/2011
PID Control System Analysis, Design, and Technology, Kiam Heong Ang, Gregory Chong, Student Member, IEEE, and Yun Li, Member, IEEE
16th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of IEEE Multi-conference on Systems and Control Singapore, 1-3 October 2007, Frequency Response Analysis of Active Disturbance Rejection Based Control System Gang Tian1 and Zhiqiang Gao1,2
Scaling and Bandwidth-Parameterization Based Controller Tuning Zhiqiang Gao Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio 44115
04/13/2023 32