46
Anaemia in pregnancy–challenge or opportunity? Prema Ramachandran Director Nutrition Foundation of India and President , National Academy of Medical

Anaemia in

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

anemia

Citation preview

  • Anaemia in pregnancychallenge or opportunity?

    Prema Ramachandran

    Director Nutrition Foundation of India and President , National Academy of Medical Sciences

  • Magnitude of the problem Why is anemia so common? Why anaemia in pregnancy is a cause of grave concern? National anaemia prophylaxis/control programmes Problems in implementation New initiatives in the Tenth Plan NRHM Challenges and opportunities in Eleventh Plan

  • Magnitude of the problem

  • Prevalence of anaemia Source: WHO

    Global Developed Developing India Urban RuralChildren 5yrs 37 7 46 50 60Men 18 326 35 45Women 35 1147 50 60Pregnant 59 1451 65 75Women

    About one third of the global population ( over 2 billion persons ) are anaemic .Anaemia is the most common nutritional deficiency disorder in the world Prevalence of anaemia is higher in developing countries Prevalence of anaemia in India is very high in all groups of the population

  • Prevalence of anaemia is high in South Asia. Even among South Asian countries prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy is highest in India.

  • ANAEMIA IN PREGNANCY - ASIAN COUNTRIES

    WHO 1992

    BANGLADESH

    CHINA

    INDIA

    INDONES IA

    MALAYSIA

    MYANMAR

    NEPAL

    PAKISTAN

    PHILIPPINES

    SPORE

    SRILANKA

    THAILAND

  • Trends in prevalence of anaemia in pregnant women in IndiaOver 70 % of pregnant women in India are anaemic. There has been no decline in anaemia in the last three decades

    YEARAUTHORPLACEPREVALENCE %1975Sood et alDelhi801982Prema Hyderabad751987Agarwal et alBihar & UP871989Christian et alChandrapur, Panchmahal87,881988-92Agarwal et alRural Varanasi941989ICMR11 states871994Sheshadri Baroda742000NFHS 2All India52.0? 99- 2000ICMR11 states84.6 2002-04DLHS 2 All districts90.4 2006 NNMB8 states 70.32007 MFHS 3All India 57.9?

  • Anaemia begins in childhood, worsens during adolescence in girls and gets aggravated during pregnancy

    Chart1

    339.2507.8

    2443285

    33651.49.6

    severe

    moderate

    mild

    no anaemia

    Group

    Percentage

    Prevalence of Anaemia (%){DLHS 2003}

    Sheet1

    prevalence of anaemia

    severemoderatemildno anaemia

    preschool children3.039.250.07.8

    adolescent girls24.043.028.05.0

    pregnant women3.036.051.49.6

    Sheet1

    0000

    0000

    0000

    severe

    moderate

    mild

    no anaemia

    Group

    Percentage

    Prevalence of Anaemia (%)

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Source: NNMB 2003Among the southern states, prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy is lower in Kerala and Tamil Nadu -?due to better access to health care

  • Anaemia pregnant women, India (Age between 15 - 44 years)Source : DLHS2DLHS 2 showed that over 90% of pregnant women are anaemic both in urban and in rural areas

  • Source NNBM Majority of children, adolescents, adult men& women are anaemic.Anaemia antedates pregnancy& gets aggravated during pregnancy. Maternal anaemia results in poor iron stores in foetus Prevalence anaemia in children is high because of poor iron stores, low iron content of breast milk and complementary foods. There is thus an intergenerational self perpetuating vicious cycle of anaemia in all age groups

    Chart8

    25.724.745.64.1

    15.111.860.113.1

    3.850.742.53.1

    30.847.120.61.5

    9.932.150.97.1

    2.221.948.727.2

    33.123.741.12.1

    3.749.2443.1

    Normal

    Mild

    Moderate

    Severe

    Prevalence of anaemia in children, adolescent girls and pregnant women from 3 surveys

    Sheet1

    SevereModerate

    Kerala05

    Arunachal Pradesh34

    Jammu & Kashmir09

    Manipur09

    Sikkim412

    Goa018

    Mizoram217

    Tripura129

    Tamil nadu228

    Karnataka130

    West Bengal433

    Andhra Pradesh237

    Meghalaya1228

    Uttaranchal338

    Jharkhand141

    Bihar240

    INDIA343

    Rajasthan344

    Himachal Pradesh444

    Delhi147

    Orissa445

    Uttar Pradesh346

    Maharashtra252

    Gujarat549

    Madhya Pradesh351

    Haryana353

    Punjab354

    Chattisgarh556

    Assam859

    SevereModerate

    Children (0-71 months)Rural345

    Urban341

    Adolescent girls (10-19 yrs)Rural2849

    Urban2649

    Pregnant women (15-44 yrs)Rural443

    Urban240

    SevereModerate

    Jammu & Kashmir08

    Kerala010

    Manipur124

    Goa025

    Mizoram224

    Arunachal Pradesh128

    Nagaland231

    West Bengal231

    Tamil nadu431

    Karnataka334

    Uttaranchal337

    Meghalaya635

    Andhra Pradesh339

    Rajasthan240

    Jharkhand141

    Sikkim539

    Orissa341

    Tripura143

    India344

    Bihar347

    Assam743

    Uttar Pradesh347

    Himachal Pradesh348

    Delhi448

    Maharashtra350

    Madhya Pradesh450

    Punjab550

    Gujarat552

    Haryana554

    Chattisgarh456

    SevereModerate

    Manipur06

    Mizoram112

    Jammu & Kashmir719

    Kerala230

    Sikkim2121

    Meghalaya937

    Goa1139

    Tripura1937

    Arunachal Pradesh1046

    Karnataka1544

    Nagaland2142

    Uttaranchal2939

    Tamil nadu1850

    Andhra Pradesh2447

    West Bengal1855

    Uttar Pradesh2947

    INDIA2749

    Madhya Pradesh3345

    Himachal Pradesh3147

    Orissa2751

    Rajasthan2257

    Gujarat3941

    Bihar2853

    Jharkhand2456

    Delhi2952

    Assam4041

    Maharashtra2953

    Punjab3448

    Haryana4046

    Chattisgarh4840

    EducationStandard of living index

    Illiterate0-9 yrs> 10 yrsLowMediumHigh

    Children (0-71 mnths)3.432.43.332.5

    EducationStandard of living index

    Illiterate0-9 yrs> 10 yrsLowMediumHigh

    Adolescent girls32.626.424.129.325.725.1

    Pregnant women3.83.11.64.22.31.8

    Pregnant womenAdolescent girlsChildren

    NNMBICMRDLHSNNMBICMRDLHSNNMBDLHS

    Normal25.715.13.830.89.92.233.13.7

    Mild24.711.850.747.132.121.923.749.2

    Moderate45.660.142.520.650.948.741.144

    Severe4.113.13.11.57.127.22.13.1

    Sheet1

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Percentage of severe and moderate anaemia (rural & urban)

    Sheet2

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Percentage of children (0-71 mnths) suffering from severe and moderate anaemia (state wise)

    Sheet3

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Percentage of adolescent girls (10-19 yrs) suffering from moderate and severe anaemia (state wise)

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Percentage of pregnant women (15-44 yrs) suffering from moderate and severe anaemia

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Children (0-71 mnths)

    Percentage of severe anaemia in children by mothers education & standard of living index

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Adolescent girls

    Pregnant women

    Percentage of severe anaemia by education and standard of living index

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    Source: NNMB-MND2003, ICMR 2001, DLHS-RCH 2002-04

    Normal

    Mild

    Moderate

    Severe

    Prevalence of anaemia in children, adolescent girls and pregnant women from 3 surveys

  • Prevalence of anaemia is high even in high income groups and among well educated pregnant women

    Chart2

    32.648.5

    26.449.2

    24.147.1

    29.349.5

    25.748.1

    25.148.1

    3.847.8

    3.140.6

    1.633.4

    4.245.7

    2.341

    1.836.8

    Source: Ref 7.11.1.6

    Severe

    Moderate

    Prevalence of anaemia in adolescent girls & pregnant women by education & standard of living index

    Sheet1

    SevereModerate

    Children (0-71 months)Rural345

    Urban341

    Adolescent girls (10-19 yrs)Rural2849

    Urban2649

    Pregnant women (15-44 yrs)Rural443

    Urban240

    SevereModerate

    EducationIlliterate3.447.8

    0-9 yrs342.3

    > 10 yrs2.436.5

    Standard of living indexLow3.347.1

    Medium342.4

    High2.537.7

    SevereModerate

    Adolescent girlsEducationIlliterate32.648.5

    0-9 yrs26.449.2

    >10yrs24.147.1

    Standard of living indexLow29.349.5

    Medium25.748.1

    High25.148.1

    Pregnant womenEducationIlliterate3.847.8

    0-9 yrs3.140.6

    >10yrs1.633.4

    Standard of living indexLow4.245.7

    Medium2.341

    High1.836.8

    Pregnant womenAdolescent girlsChildren

    NNMBICMRDLHSNNMBICMRDLHSNNMBDLHS

    Normal25.715.13.830.89.92.233.13.7

    Mild24.711.850.747.132.121.923.749.2

    Moderate45.660.142.520.650.948.741.144

    Severe4.113.13.11.57.127.22.13.1

    MenWomen

    Normal45.224.8

    Mild45.841.9

    Moderate8.430.5

    Severe0.62.8

    Any ANCWeight takenBP check upAbdominal check upIFA

    Bihar30.99.514.626.317

    UP46.79.211.727.727.7

    Haryana70.430.131.85748.7

    TN98.187.886.588.179.1

    Sheet1

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Figure: Percentage of severe and moderate anaemia (rural & urban)

    Sheet2

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    Source: NNMB-MND2003, ICMR 2001, DLHS-RCH 2002-04

    Normal

    Mild

    Moderate

    Severe

    Prevalence of anaemia in children, adolescent girls and pregnant women from 3 surveys

    Sheet3

    0000

    0000

    Source: NNMB, 2006

    Normal

    Mild

    Moderate

    Severe

    Figure 5: Prevalence of anaemia among adult men & women (NNMB, 2006)

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Figure: Prevalence of anaemia in children by mothers education & standard of living index

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Figure: Prevalence of anaemia in adolescent girls & pregnant women by education & standard of living index

    00000

    00000

    00000

    00000

    Source: Household survey, 1999-99

    Any ANC

    Weight taken

    BP check up

    Abdominal check up

    IFA

    Figure 7: Quality of antenatal survey (Household survey, 1998-99)

    SevereModerate

    KeralaPreg05

    Children010

    Adol230

    J & KPreg09

    Children08

    Adol719

    TNPreg228

    Children431

    Adol1850

    KarnatakaPreg130

    Children334

    Adol1544

    WBPreg433

    Children231

    Adol1855

    AndhraPreg237

    Children339

    Adol2447

    UttaranchalPreg338

    Children337

    Adol2939

    JharkhandPreg141

    Children141

    Adol2456

    BiharPreg240

    Children347

    Adol2853

    INDIAPreg343

    Children344

    Adol2749

    RajasthanPreg344

    Children240

    Adol2257

    HPPreg444

    Children348

    Adol3147

    DelhiPreg147

    Children448

    Adol2952

    OrissaPreg445

    Children341

    Adol2751

    UPPreg346

    Children347

    Adol2947

    MaharashtraPreg252

    Children350

    Adol2953

    GujaratPreg549

    Children552

    Adol3941

    MPPreg351

    Children450

    Adol3345

    HaryanaPreg353

    Children554

    Adol4046

    PunjabPreg354

    Children550

    Adol3448

    ChattisgrhPreg556

    Children456

    Adol4840

    AssamPreg859

    Children743

    Adol4041

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Severe

    Moderate

    Prevalence of severe and moderate by states

    KeralaJammu and kashmirTamil naduKarnatakaWest BengalAndhraUttaranchalJharkhandBiharIndiaRajashanHPDelhiOrissaUttar PradeshMaharashtra

    PregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdol

    Severe002007241813154218

    Moderate510309819283150303444333155

  • Why is anemia so common

  • Major causes of anemia

    Inadequate iron, folate intake due to low vegetable consumption and perhaps low B12 intake Poor bioavailability of dietary iron from the fibre, phytate rich Indian diets Chronic blood loss Increased requirement of iron during pregnancy

  • Time trends in intake of iron, folic acid and vitamin C in rural and urban areas (c/day) (NNMB)Dietary intake of iron and folate are less than 50% of the RDA Bioavailability of iron from phytate and fibre rich Indian diets is only 3 %

    NutrientsNNMBRuralUrban1975-791988-901996-972000-012004-051975-791993-94Iron (mg)30.228.424.917.514.824.918.96Vit C37374051444042Folic acid**1536252.3**

  • Iron intake is low in all age groups and does not increase in pregnancy; there has been no increase in iron intake over 3 decades

  • Why is anaemia in pregnancy a cause of grave concern

  • INDIAIndias share in global maternal deaths It is estimated that globally there are over 5 lakh maternal deaths every year. There are about 1 to 1.2 lakh maternal deaths in India every year India with 16% global population accounts for 20-25 % % of all maternal deaths in the world

  • About half the deaths from anaemia in the world occur in South Asian countries. India accounts for over 80% of deaths due to anaemia in South Asia

    Prevalence of Iron deficiency anemia in South Asia% CountryChildren< 5 yearsWomen15-49 yearsPregnant womenMaternal deaths from anemiaAfghanistan6561--Bangladesh5536742600Bhutan815568

  • Anaemia directly causes 20% of maternal deaths and indirectly accounts for another 20% of maternal deaths.These figures have remained unchanged in the last five decades

    Chart1

    29.6

    19

    16.1

    8.9

    9.5

    8.3

    8.4

    CAUSES OF MATERNAL MORTALITY

    SRS-1998

    Sheet1

    Pie 2

    Hemorrhage29.6

    Anemia19

    Sepsis16.1

    Abortion8.9

    Obst. Lab9.5

    Toxemia8.3

    Others8.4

    Sheet1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Consequences of anaemia in pregnancy8-11 g/dL: easy fatigability, poor work capacity 5-7.9 g/dL: impaired immune function, increased morbidity due to infections
  • Maternal anaemia is associated with poor intrauterine growth and increased risk of preterm births resulting in increase low birth weight rates. This in turn results in higher perinatal morbidity and mortality, higher IMR and poor growth trajectory in infancy, childhood and adolescence. A doubling of low birthweight rate and 2 to 3 fold increase in the perinatal mortality rates is seen when the Hb falls
  • Immune status of anaemic pregnant women

    There is a fall in T and B cell count when maternal Hb is below < 11 g/dLThe fall in T and B cell counts are significant when Hb is

  • Anaemia prophylaxis/control programme for pregnant women

  • Programmes for prevention and management of anaemia in pregnancy India was the first developing country to take up a National Nutritional Anaemia Prophylaxis Programme to prevent anaemia among pregnant women and children in 1973 At that time AN care coverage under rural primary health care was very low and there was no provision for screening pregnant women for anaemia. Therefore an attempt was made to identify all pregnant women and give them100 tablets containing 60mg of iron&500g of folic acid In hospital settings, screening for anaemia and iron-folate therapy in appropriate doses and route of administration for the prevention and management of anaemia have been incorporated as an essential component of antenatal care

  • Management of anaemia in pregnancyObstetric text books in India provided country specific protocols for management of anaemia, based on studies carried out in the country Hb < 5 g/dLConstitute 5- 10 % of anaemic womenAdmission and intensive care preferably in secondary or tertiary care institutions to ensure maternal and fetal salvageHb 5 to 7.9g/dLConstitute 10 to 20% anaemic womenScreen for systemic/obstetric problems and infectionsIf she has no other systemic or obstetric problems give her parenteral iron (IV or IM)

  • Total Dose IV Iron (TDI) therapySafety and efficacy of Intravenous total dose iron therapy was proved by trials undertaken by Dr MenonSubsequently IV total dose iron therapy was used in several hospitals in Chennai and and elsewhere Advantage : Only two day hospital admission Disadvantage: On rare occasions anaphylactic reaction occurred; even in the tertiary care hospitals it was not possible to save all women who had anaphylactic reaction In view of this TDI was given up and intramuscular iron therapy was preferred

  • IM iron therapy IRON DEXTRAN- Following initial successful trials by Dr Menon, Dr Bhatt and others, IM iron dextran injections were widely used in hospital settings often on out patient basis ; about 1/3rd develop fever arthralgia or myalgia IRON SORBITOL COMPLEX : Initial trials by Dr Menon showed promising results but it was not so widely used because 1/3rd of the drug gets excreted in urine and higher dose of elemental iron is required .Side effects are mild : nausea, giddiness

    Effect of IM iron dextran on Hb &birth weight (Prema 1982) GroupNo.No.Hb < 8g/dl untreated4432530 + 651IM iron from 20 weeks762890 + 428IM iron from 28 weeks1052734 + 416None of the women who received 1gm of IM iron dextran had Hb less than 11g/dl at delivery

  • Problems in implementation of anaemia prevention and control programmes

  • DLHS 1 (1998-99) showed that pregnant women were not being screened for anaemia and given appropriate therapyAll pregnant women who were given antenatal check up were given tablets containing iron (100mg) and folic acid 500 g. Most women in poorly performing states did not come for antenatal check up. Many of those who came, did not get IFA through out pregnancy. Majority did not consume even the tablets that they got

    Chart1

    30.99.514.626.317

    46.79.211.727.727.7

    70.430.131.85748.7

    98.187.886.588.179.1

    Any ANC

    Weight taken

    BP check up

    Abdominal check up

    IFA

    Content of antenatal care (Household survey, 1998-99)

    Sheet1

    SevereModerate

    Children (0-71 months)Rural345

    Urban341

    Adolescent girls (10-19 yrs)Rural2849

    Urban2649

    Pregnant women (15-44 yrs)Rural443

    Urban240

    SevereModerate

    EducationIlliterate3.447.8

    0-9 yrs342.3

    > 10 yrs2.436.5

    Standard of living indexLow3.347.1

    Medium342.4

    High2.537.7

    SevereModerate

    Adolescent girlsEducationIlliterate32.648.5

    0-9 yrs26.449.2

    >10yrs24.147.1

    Standard of living indexLow29.349.5

    Medium25.748.1

    High25.148.1

    Pregnant womenEducationIlliterate3.847.8

    0-9 yrs3.140.6

    >10yrs1.633.4

    Standard of living indexLow4.245.7

    Medium2.341

    High1.836.8

    Pregnant womenAdolescent girlsChildren

    NNMBICMRDLHSNNMBICMRDLHSNNMBDLHS

    Normal25.715.13.830.89.92.233.13.7

    Mild24.711.850.747.132.121.923.749.2

    Moderate45.660.142.520.650.948.741.144

    Severe4.113.13.11.57.127.22.13.1

    MenWomen

    Normal45.224.8

    Mild45.841.9

    Moderate8.430.5

    Severe0.62.8

    Any ANCWeight takenBP check upAbdominal check upIFA

    Bihar30.99.514.626.317

    UP46.79.211.727.727.7

    Haryana70.430.131.85748.7

    TN98.187.886.588.179.1

    Sheet1

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Figure: Percentage of severe and moderate anaemia (rural & urban)

    Sheet2

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    Source: NNMB-MND2003, ICMR 2001, DLHS-RCH 2002-04

    Normal

    Mild

    Moderate

    Severe

    Prevalence of anaemia in children, adolescent girls and pregnant women from 3 surveys

    Sheet3

    0000

    0000

    Source: NNMB, 2006

    Normal

    Mild

    Moderate

    Severe

    Figure 5: Prevalence of anaemia among adult men & women (NNMB, 2006)

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Figure: Prevalence of anaemia in children by mothers education & standard of living index

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Source: DLHS-RCH, 2002-04

    Severe

    Moderate

    Figure: Prevalence of anaemia in adolescent girls & pregnant women by education & standard of living index

    00000

    00000

    00000

    00000

    Source: Household survey, 1999-99

    Any ANC

    Weight taken

    BP check up

    Abdominal check up

    IFA

    Figure 7: Quality of antenatal survey (Household survey, 1998-99)

    SevereModerate

    KeralaPreg05

    Children010

    Adol230

    J & KPreg09

    Children08

    Adol719

    TNPreg228

    Children431

    Adol1850

    KarnatakaPreg130

    Children334

    Adol1544

    WBPreg433

    Children231

    Adol1855

    AndhraPreg237

    Children339

    Adol2447

    UttaranchalPreg338

    Children337

    Adol2939

    JharkhandPreg141

    Children141

    Adol2456

    BiharPreg240

    Children347

    Adol2853

    INDIAPreg343

    Children344

    Adol2749

    RajasthanPreg344

    Children240

    Adol2257

    HPPreg444

    Children348

    Adol3147

    DelhiPreg147

    Children448

    Adol2952

    OrissaPreg445

    Children341

    Adol2751

    UPPreg346

    Children347

    Adol2947

    MaharashtraPreg252

    Children350

    Adol2953

    GujaratPreg549

    Children552

    Adol3941

    MPPreg351

    Children450

    Adol3345

    HaryanaPreg353

    Children554

    Adol4046

    PunjabPreg354

    Children550

    Adol3448

    ChattisgrhPreg556

    Children456

    Adol4840

    AssamPreg859

    Children743

    Adol4041

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    Severe

    Moderate

    Prevalence of severe and moderate by states

    KeralaJammu and kashmirTamil naduKarnatakaWest BengalAndhraUttaranchalJharkhandBiharIndiaRajashanHPDelhiOrissaUttar PradeshMaharashtra

    PregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdolPregChildrenAdol

    Severe002007241813154218

    Moderate510309819283150303444333155

  • Proportion of pregnant women who receive IFA tablets is not high even among well performing states like Tamil Nadu , Kerala and Maharashtra . Many of those who received IFA did not receive 100 tablets Many of those who received did not take the tablets regularly

    Chart1

    Kerala38.5

    062.4

    Karnataka68

    048.5

    077.3

    054.2

    Orissa72.9

    %

    % of pregnant women who received some IFA tablets (NNMB)

    Sheet1

    States

    ParticularsKeralaTamilKarnatakaAndhraMahara-MadhyaOrissaWestPooled

    NaduPradeshshtraPradeshBengal

    N1432582843302992122691871982

    Received38.562.46848.577.354.272.970.662.7

    States

    ParticularsKeralaTamilKarnatakaAndhraMahara-MadhyaOrissaWest

    NaduPradeshshtraPradeshBengal

    Received38.562.46848.577.354.272.9187

    70.6

    Sheet1

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    %

    % who received some IFA tablets (NNMB)

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • ICMR study confirmed that most women received 90 tablets without Hb screening. Many did not take tablets regularly. Even among small number of women who took over 90 tablets rise in Hb was low and many continued to be anaemic

    Hb in Pregnant women taking Iron Supplementation(ICMR 2000)No of tablets ingestedNo. Hb (g/dL)MeanS.D1-153108.81.716-302519.21.531-601969.31.861-90999.21.6>90749.12.1Total who had IFA9309.12.2B.Not known169.12.6C.Not had IFA38299.13.8A+B+C47759.13.5

  • IM iron therapyIM iron therapy mainly iron dextan was used mainly in some medical colleges and rarely at district hospitals. It never reached primary health care level There were problems in ensuring continuous supply of drugs even at medical collegesSome women found it difficult to come to OPD daily for ten days for IM injections Though women who were counseled agreed to IM therapy, those who developed trouble some side effects like arthralgia wanted to discontinue; convincing them to continue was difficult

  • New initiatives in the Tenth Plan NRHM

  • New Initiatives in the Tenth Plan Emphasis on screening all pregnant women for anaemia and providing appropriate treatment depending upon Hb levels Anaemia prophylaxis For women who are not anaemic one tablet of iron 100mg and 500 g folic acid once a day would be sufficient to prevent any deterioration in Hb levelsOral iron therapy for mild anaemia Majority of anaemic women in pregnancy have mild anaemia . Oral iron folate therapy (one tablet of iron 100mg and 500 g twice a day) regularly should be able to improve their Hb IM iron therapy for moderate anaemia One fifth of pregnant women have moderate anaemia. They should get IM iron therapyHospitalisation and intensive care for those with severe anaemia

  • Components of antenatal care DLHS -2 DLHS 2 (2006) showed that there was some improvement in coverage and content of antenatal care. About 40% women had blood examination which might include Hb estimation .

  • Iron & Folic Acid Supplementation in pregnancy DLHS 2 IFA Per DayDuring Entire PregnancyDLHS 2 also showed that there has been some improvement in % of pregnant receiving IFA tablets.There has been a significant reduction in the % of women who received but did not consume the tablets. These data suggest that if all pregnant women are screened for anaemia and provided appropriate therapy it might be possible to achieve substantial reduction in prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy

  • NFI study showed that IM iron sorbital therapy is feasible in primary care institutions. Mean Hb rose and there was significant improvement in birth weight. BUT majority of women who received 900 mg of iron sorbital had Hb levels around 10 g/dl and birth weight was lower than the birth weight in non-anaemic women.It would appear that 1500mg of iron sorbital citric acid complex would be required for optimal results .

    Impact of IM iron sorbital on Maternal Hb & birth-weight(NFI)Maternal Hb (g/dl)NBirth weight(g)I - < 8.0972577+378.3II - 8.0 11.06452796+394.7III - > 11.01032921+418.1Total8452786+4055 All women who had IM iron therapy 3402805+379.3

  • Side effects of IM iron sorbitol citric acid complex Metallic taste in the mouth 32.4%Nausea/vomiting 15.3%Pain at the site of injection 38.3%Infection at the injection site 0.3%None had muscle or joint pain which is commonly seen with iron dextran injections Nausea and vomiting was treated with anti-emetics.Patients with pain at injection site were given paracetamol and IM iron therapy continued; one patient who developed infection responded to antibiotics

  • Challenges in the Eleventh Plan period

  • Challenges in anaemia prevention and control programmes Majority of Indians are anaemic Over 3/4th of pregnant women are anaemicThere has not been any decline in the prevalence of anaemia or its adverse consequences on mother child dyad over the last six decades

  • Opportunities in the Eleventh Plan period

  • Strategy for prevention of anaemia in pregnancy

    health and nutrition education to improve over all dietary intakes and promote consumption of iron and folate-rich foodstuffs- possible through NRHMs health and nutrition days dietary diversification inclusion of iron folate rich foods as well as food items that promote iron absorption- possible with proper linkages with National Horticultural Mission introduction of iron and iodine-fortified salt universally to improve iron intake- possible with NIN technologyOpportunity: Affordable & sustainable interventions to improve iron and folate intake of the entire family and prevent anaemia are readily available .

  • Strategy for prevention of anaemia in pregnancy focus on Hb estimation for detection and treatment of anemia in adolescent school girls as a part of school health check possible through school health system

    focus on Hb estimation in girls / women who are married, for detection and treatment of anemia prior to pregnancy- can be attempted through coordination with AWW

    screening all pregnant women for anemia-Possible using filter paper technique

    providing one tablet of IFA to prevent any fall in Hb levels in non anaemic pregnant women- possible through NRHM

    Opportunity:All these interventions are feasible& affordable for the individual and health system. With universal coverage and monitored supplementation it is possible to ensure that non anaemic women do not become anaemic

  • Strategy for detection&management of anaemia in pregnancy iron folate oral medication at the maximum tolerable dose throughout pregnancy for women with Hb between 8 10.9g/dL possible through convergence between AWW and ANMIM iron therapy for women with Hb between 5 and 7.9 g/dL if they do not have any obstetric or systemic complication- possible with urban & rural PHCs taking the major responsibility hospital admission and intensive personalised care for women with haemoglobin less than 5 g/dl- possible with referral to tertiary care centres using of emergency transport funds and ASHA screening and effective management of obstetric and systemic problems in anaemic pregnant women possible in hospitals improvement in health education to the community to promote utilisation of available care possible through AWW, ASHA, ANM and PRI Opportunity:All these interventions are feasible& affordable for the individual and health system.

  • Opportunities for prevention, detection and appropriate management of anemia in pregnant women India currently has the necessary infrastrucutre , manpower, technology for this task Indians are rational and responsive; peoples institutions are in place providing the necessary community support Prevention, detection and appropriate management of anemia in pregnant women and preventing the adverse consequences of anaemia on the mother child dyad is feasible under NRHM and its urban counterpart The country should take this opportunity to show case how it can cope with a major challenge effectively