28
AN INNOVATIVE PUMPED-STORAGE PROJECT IN AN UNDERGROUND MINE Ernst Zeller November 2017

AN INNOVATIVE PUMPED-STORAGE PROJECT IN … BUsiness Dialogue...BENEFITS OF PUMPED STORAGE POWER PLANTS Storing Energy –Provide a substantial contribution towards a balance between

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AN INNOVATIVE PUMPED-STORAGE PROJECT IN AN UNDERGROUND MINE

Ernst ZellerNovember 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

AGENDA

NOVEMBER 20172

Pump storage technology

Battery vs. Pump storage technology

Why in Pyhäsalmi Ore Mine?

Pyhäsalmi Project

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

PUMP STORAGE TECHNOLOGY

NOVEMBER 20173

Pumped storage facility is made by two water basins, connected by a pressure

pipe, with the water running through a pump-turbine rotating motor-generator

Demand

Pumping

PSP Productionמתח תדר יציבות

Load MW

איזור התועלות הדינמיות

Straightened curve

Pumping

Storing potential energy by pumping the water from the lower basin to an upper

one and using that energy by releasing the water back when required

Upper Reservoir

Lower Reservoir

Turbine mode

Pump mode

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

PROVEN MATURE TECHNOLOGY

NOVEMBER 20174

World Energy Council 2015:

” 99% of world’s

operational electricity

storage is in hydropower

(pump storage)”

“PSP is a significantly cheaper energy

storage alternative compares to

batteries, answering all national grid

dynamic benefits needs “

IEC 2016:

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO WORLDWIDE

NOVEMBER 20175

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

PUMPED STORAGE VS BATTERIES (PSP VS BAT)

NOVEMBER 20176

LIFE TIME TECHNOLOGY

CAPEX OPEX

> 50 years vs. ~15 years

PSP BAT

Batteries Lifetime is 11-15 years*

Batteries storage capacity decreases

substantially after 3 years

* According to NREL Predictive Models of Li-ion Battery Lifetime

1

100

10000

PSP Batteries

O&

M C

ost

[$/kW]

According to Energy Storage Screening Study For Integrating Variable Energy Resources within

the PacifiCorp System July 9, 2014According to EPRI Energy Storage Project A

PSP

~77 %

~68 %

~65 %

~40%

Pumped storage hydro

Batteries Li-ion*

Compressed air

Hydrogen

* Average Efficiency, which declines over the years for Batteries

BENEFITS OF PUMPED STORAGE POWER PLANTS

Storing Energy

– Provide a substantial contribution towards a balance between electricity generation and

consumption

– Absorb excess power in the grid particularly when balancing energy produced by wind and

solar plants

– wind and solar erratic through 24 hour period

– Increase of Wind capacity in many emerging countries

– Solar power starts

Balancing Services

– Provide required regulatory functions contributing to grid stabilization and frequency regulation

at primary and secondary levels in generating mode

– Black Start services able

Increasing Effectiveness of Renewables

– Diversify the energy mix

– Absorb base load production particularly from nuclear and coal plants at night and release

during peak hours in morning and evening

Lower the dependency on non-renewable fuels

– Combining the generation of Wind- Solar- and Hydro Energy with Pumped Storage Power

plants

Reducing Transmission costs

– Installing PSPP close to Demand and Generation of Wind Power

7November 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

PYHÄSALMI MINE

8NOVEMBER 2017

• Provides 1400 m of head!

• Perfectly investigated geology with best rock conditions

• Infrastructure on ground and in 1400 m depth including access tunnel

• Excavated open pit for a upper reservoir, 110 kV connection and substation

• Good location in balancing the Finnish power grid

• Mine operation will run until 2019

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

GEOLOGY – GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS

Very good knowledge from existing mine

operation

Mafic volcanites are preferred for underground

structures

Parameters:

Very good rock mass quality

Small plasticisation around excavation

expected, but high risk of “rock burst”

High elastic modulus low level of

deformations expected

Temperature conditions constantly around

22°C in 1400 m depth.

Groundwater:

– High chloride concentration (level of marine

water) corrosion risk!

– Hydraulic conductivity very low

– Rock is very dry at lower levels

NOVEMBER 20179

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

ALTERNATIVE STUDY – HYDRAULIC HEAD

NOVEMBER 201710

Elevation -700 m

Elevation -1400 m

Preferred location

– Higher head / reduced flow rate

– Reduced underground storage size main cost driver

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

ALTERNATIVE STUDY - MAIN PLANT CHARACTERISTICS

NOVEMBER 201711

50 MW 100 MW 200 MW 300 MW 400 MW

Number of units 1x50 1x100 2x100 2x150 2x200

Q [m³/s] 4.0 8.0 16.0 24.0 32.0

Shaft

Velocity [m/s] 3 3 3 3 3

Required area [m²] 1.3 2.7 5.3 8.0 10.7

Number of shafts 1 1 1 1 or 2 1 or 2

Diameter [m] 1.8 (1.3) 1.8 2.6 3.2 or 2x2.3 3.7 or 2x2.6

Cavern

Volume [m³] 30,375 45,000 70,000 78,300 86,550

Storage size [m³]

6 h 90,400 176,800 350,600 525,900 701,200

8 h 119,200 234,400 465,800 698,700 931,600

10 h 148,000 292,000 581,000 871,500 1,162,000

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

INITIAL ECONOMIC EVALUATION

NOVEMBER 201712

Expected revenues from day-ahead market are relative modest

Revenues from ancillary services are limited due to market size

Outcome from generation benefit analysis (Pöyry’s BID3 market model)

suggests that the most feasible configuration is around 75 MW and 6 hours

storage size.

Due to current challenging market conditions an implementation in stages

appears favourable.

2 options have been studied further:

– 75 + 75 MW

– 100 + 100 MW

wide range from 75 MW to 200 MW is covered within the feasibility study

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

MAIN PLANT SECTION – 75MW

13NOVEMBER 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

MAIN PLANT LAYOUT – 75MW

14NOVEMBER 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

LOWER RESERVOIR

Layout of final tunnels optimized

in respect to geological

conditions (joint systems, primary

state of stress) and existing

tunnel system

Aeration tunnel can be used for

construction, partly as reservoir

and for later access in case of

maintenance

Active storage of 162,000 m³ and

21,000 m³ for dewatering of

power waterway

15NOVEMBER 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

POWER SHAFT - UNLINED

Unlined pressure shaft (based on experience from Norway)

Design criteria:

Sufficient distance to existing tunnels (based on rock

condition / hydraulic gradient < 18 distance min. 70m

Reduced flow velocity < 2.5 m/s

Include a rock trap before cavern

Raised boring method constructed in 2 sections

Treatment of fracture zone

NOVEMBER 201716

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

ES PYHÄSALMI - CAVERN DESIGN – 75MW

17NOVEMBER 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION - EXPANDABLE DESIGN

18NOVEMBER 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRYNOVEMBER 2017

19

TERNARY UNIT SET – ARRANGEMENT - VERTICAL

MG

T

P

T

MG

P

T

MG

P

Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3M.O.L.

hs

… Motorgenerator

… Turbine

… Pump

Legend

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRYNOVEMBER 2017

20

TERNARY UNIT SET - DESIGN CHALLENGE

MG

T

P

hs

M.O.L.

F.S.L.

~11 m

hf

Motorgenerator

Pelton-Turbine

with mandatory free board

Shaft length!

Multistage Pump

with mandatory suction head

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRYNOVEMBER 2017

21

TERNARY UNIT SET - 75 MW UNIT SET

Pelton Turbine

Converter

Multistage Pump

Motorgenerator

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRYNOVEMBER 2017

22

CYCLE EFFICIENCIES AT RATED OPERATION POINT

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

TRANSPORT LOGISTICS

NOVEMBER 201723

• Transport of large E&M equipment to depth level of -1400 m is considered as critical

• Existing decline tunnel has steep gradient, narrow curve radius and restricted cross-

section

• Transport study showed that curves have to widened by about 1,5 m.

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

CONCLUSION

NOVEMBER 201724

• Preferred location at -1400 m depth in order to utilise the full head and to minimise

related storage volume.

• No technical “show stoppers” have been identified.

• Technical and construction advantages due to excellent geological conditions.

• Ternary unit set with pressured turbine-tailwater chamber is the preferred arrangement.

• Specific costs are in the lower range compared to other PS projects.

• Economic evaluation (Pöyry’s BID3 market model) showed challenging conditions for PS

in Finland.

If realised it will

likely be the

pumped -storage

plant with the

highest head

worldwide.

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

70%

with higher

academic

degree

45countries

50languages

spoken

10,000projects

delivered

annually

6,000 experts

150offices

70nationalities

WE ARE PÖYRY – THE CONNECTED COMPANY

CLIENT

FOCUS

Delivering consulting,

engineering, project execution

and operational services.

Global community of talented

people working closely with

clients locally.

Inspiring new solutions by

connecting deep expertise

and profound insight.

Contributing to projects that

make a difference.

INDUSTRYENERGY INFRA

25NOVEMBER 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

ENERGY – EMPOWERING YOUR BUSINESS

• Thermal power & Renewable energy

• Hydropower

• Transmission & distribution

• Nuclear energy

* RANKED #

8OVER

60 GW

DELIVERED

200+

CONTRIBUTED TO

10%

in power generation

globally *

total hydropower

capacity globally

total combined

capacity of thermal

power plant projects

wind power

projects

Consulting. Engineering. Projects. Operations. * source: ENR 2015

26NOVEMBER 2017

COPYRIGHT©PÖYRY

INFORMATION

NOVEMBER 201727

Consulting. Engineering. Projects. Operations. www.poyry.com

Contact:

Ernst Zeller

[email protected]