Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An improved sub-grid scale flow model for transient fuel spraysAn improved sub-grid scale flow model for transient fuel sprays
Federico Perini, Rolf D. ReitzFederico Perini, Rolf D. Reitz
Motivation Sub-grid scale near-nozzle flow modelingMotivation
• Combustion efficiency and noise control in engines require multiple injection strategies
• Transients become a relevant part of the injection, affecting spray jet
Sub-grid scale near-nozzle flow modeling
• A sub-grid scale, transient flow prediction
(usgs) is used for the spray calculation• Transients become a relevant part of the injection, affecting spray jet properties
• Computational efficiency of the model is crucial to extend its operationto realistic engine geometries & multiple nozzles
instead than under-resolved momentumcell values
( ) +∆+′=
uθθθ
sgstsgspn dt ,
Efficient collision modeling with extended outcomes
• Estimate Radius-of-Influence (ROI) based on a tetrahedralization of the
to realistic engine geometries & multiple nozzles
∆ dt
( )
( )
−=−+
∆+
+∆+′=
urEuu
uθθθ
nnBuvwB
sgsp
sgstsgspn
B
mSm
dt
dt
,
,
1
• Estimate Radius-of-Influence (ROI) based on a tetrahedralization of the drops inside the computational parcel
SρprpVc rkd =
∑∈
Ω∉
′−+
∆+′
Ω∈
Ω∉∆+
∆
=
jet
33
4jet
jet
3
p,13
4
p0,
p,13
4
nn
tpn
Bpp
ipp
p
Bpp
uvw
rd∆t
dtrN
dt
dtrN
S
θθθ
πρ
πρ
3 4V Nk
rROI
−= π
• Implicit coupled solution with SIMPLE solver
β
Lθ
Sθ
relθ 0r ( )∑∈
Ω∈
′−
∆+
+∆+′
Ω∉
′−+
=4
jet
3
p
3
jet
pdt13
4
p,13
ip
nn
sgstpn
Bpp
nn
p
Bpp
u
rdt
rN
rd∆t
rN
θuθθ
θ
r
πρ
πρ
3
9
4
26p
Vp N
krROI
−= π
• ROI-based collision estimation is O(n2), n number of particles filter
impossible collisions based on squared distance function between two
• Implicit coupled solution with SIMPLE solver
• Transient turbulent gas-jet model used tothe effective gas jet assumption:
Lρ
impossible collisions based on squared distance function between twodroplets within the timestep
( ) ( ) ( )( ) cbtatttttdtf relrel ++=−+−+== 22
0,20,10,20,1
22
21
2 ,2, xxθxxθxx
v Strouhalu
xf≈=
( ) ( ) exp1,
−−+= ∫
t
ttx uu
• Pre-processing filter of eligible parcel couples by running a kd-tree
( ) ( ) ROItdtttifpossiblecollisionabt ≤∆≤>→−= minminminmin &&02( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )2
0
,,,
exp1,0
=
−−+= ∫
axisentrsgs
t
tinjaxis
txxftrx
ttx
uu
uu
• Pre-processing filter of eligible parcel couples by running a kd-treebased radius-of-influence search
2SROI
1SROI
eligibleeligible
not
( )2
22
2121
,,
+
=
entr
sgs
Kx
rtrxu
• Stokes number and turbulent entrainment
Ltθ∆GA-based study of spray model constants
• Deterministic bouncing, stretching separation (‘grazing’), reflexiveseparation, coalescence prediction
LROI
Ltθ∆
• 5 objective functions: vapor penetration, liquidstandard deviation, mixture fraction distribution
• 6 optimized model variable: CRT, CΛRT, B1, St, Kentr
separation, coalescence prediction
6
7
Spray A, C12
H26
, 900K, O2=0.0, t
inj=1.5ms
Experiment
simulation 1
liq
uid
pen
etra
tio
n [
cm]
Initial ramp
2
3
4
5
pen
etra
tio
n [
cm]
0.4
0.6
0.8
liq
uid
pen
etra
tio
n [
cm]
1f
2f
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
x 10-3
0
1
time [s]
0 1
0
0.2
time [s]
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN -
grid scale flow model for transient fuel spraysgrid scale flow model for transient fuel sprays
Funding Sponsor – Sandia National LaboratoriesFunding Sponsor – Sandia National Laboratories
nozzle flow modeling 0.16 nozzle flow modeling
vel.particle
vel.field
=
=
θ
u0.08
0.12
0.16
mix
ture
fra
ctio
n [
-]
experiment
simulation
z = 30 mm
r20 30 40 50mm
axial vel.particle=θ
x
r
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80
0.04
distance [cm]
mix
ture
fra
ctio
n [
-]
z
axial
Validation• Sandia Spray A and mixture preparation in a light duty optical diesel engine
Buu =
θ
dragF
distance [cm]
sgsuu =
Buu =
θ36 µs16 µs 76 µs56 µs 116 µs 136 µs 0
0.2
0.4
SIMPLE solver iteration maintained
jetΩ
B 0.4
0.6
0.8
SIMPLE solver iteration maintained
represent the sub-grid scale flow field using1
[cm]
1.5
Squish planepinj = 500 bar
Squish planepinj = 860 bar
Squish planepinj = 1220 bar
p
IStokesτ
τ=≈
( )( )
0 ,∂
−
−inj
dt u
u ττ
ττ
0
0.5
1
1.5
ex
perim
en
t
ex
perim
en
t
ex
perim
en
t
( )( )
( )0 ,
∂
∂
−
−−
inj
inj
inj
dxxSt
t uu τ
τ
ττ
τ
1.5
0
0.5
1
sim
ula
tion
CA = -15.0 CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0phi [-]
Rim plane
sim
ula
tion
CA = -15.0 CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0
Rim plane
CA = -15.0
sim
ula
tion
CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0
Rim plane
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
ex
perim
en
t
ex
perim
en
t
ex
perim
en
t
function fentr are model constants
based study of spray model constants 0
0.5
1
sim
ula
tion
CA = -15.0 CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0phi [-]
Bowl plane
CA = -15.0
sim
ula
tion
CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0
Bowl plane
sim
ula
tion
CA = -15.0 CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0
Bowl plane
transient, steady state liquid penetration and distribution
entr, γmax
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
exp
eri
men
t
Bowl plane
exp
eri
men
t
Bowl planeBowl plane
exp
eri
men
t
1.2
1.4
liq
uid
pen
etra
tio
n [
cm]
Spray A, C12
H26
, 900K, O2=0.0, t
inj=1.5ms
( )lσ
phase
4f 0
0.5
1
1.5
sim
ula
tio
n
CA = -15.0 CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0phi [-]
sim
ula
tio
n
CA = -15.0 CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0
CA = -15.0
sim
ula
tio
n
CA = -10.0 CA = -5.0
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
liq
uid
pen
etra
tio
n [
cm]
l 3f
References[1] Perini F and Reitz RD, “An effieient atomization, collision and sub-grid scale momentum
coupling model for transient vaporizing engine sprays”, Int J Multiphase Flow, submitted,
2
x 10-4time [s]
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
x 10-3
0
0.2
time [s]
l coupling model for transient vaporizing engine sprays”, Int J Multiphase Flow, submitted, 2015
ENGINE RESEARCH CENTER As of April 17, 2015