Upload
others
View
1
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An Experimental Study on the Effect of Rings on Flame Length
and Stability in Lime Kilns
Girish Mohanan
A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the
degree of Master of Applied Science
Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry
University of Toronto
© Copyright by Girish Mohanan 2017
[ii]
An Experimental Study on the Effects of Rings on Flame Length and
Stability in Lime Kilns
Girish Mohanan
Master of Applied Science
Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry
University of Toronto
2017
ABSTRACT
Ring formation in lime kilns has been a persistent problem in kraft pulp mills due to the
reversible nature of the calcination reaction that takes place in lime kilns. Rings can form due to
temperature fluctuations in the kiln, which trigger the backward reaction depositing hard calcium
carbonate deposits on the walls of the kiln. Rings can alter the inner surface of the kiln, and can
affect the flame pattern or cause impingement, causing further temperature fluctuations in the
kiln. The effect of ring position, thickness and length on flame length and stability was examined
in this work. Ring position, thickness and length were found to affect the flame shape and
stability greatly. The rings could be altering the recirculation inside the kiln and thereby affecting
the flame.
[iii]
Acknowledgements
“Skepticism is as much a result of knowledge, as knowledge of skepticism”
Alexander Pope
Exhausting has the journey been, sweeter have been the results. Yet, none of that would have
been mine to enjoy without the help and support of a lot of people. First of all, I thank my
supervisor, Professor Honghi Tran, for accepting me into his group. A truly fruitful graduate
experience I had, thanks to him, for he granted me the intellectual freedom to innovate, engaged
me in new and avant-gardist ideas, and ameliorated me by demanding a high-quality work from
all my assignments.
I thank everyone who has been a part of our research group for all their valuable suggestions and
inputs and encouragement. A special thanks to Sue Mao and Anna Ho, for helping me at various
times throughout my program. Professor Bussmann has always been supportive by giving his
suggestions, and for this I thank him. I thank all the industry partners, who funded the project, for
without them, this opportunity may not have existed.
I express my deepest gratitude to my ever-loving mother, Sreelatha, and my inspiring father,
Mattahil Mohanan without whom none of this would have been possible. They have been my
inspiration to dream, confidence to live it, and strength to strive for more. Last, but not the least,
I wish to thank Shruti for all her love.
[iv]
Contents
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iii
Contents ......................................................................................................................................... iv
List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. viii
Glossary .......................................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction: Kraft Recovery Process ..................................................................................... 2
1.1 Lime Kilns ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.2 Ring formation in kilns .................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Burner operation and ring formation ................................................................................ 5
Hypothesis ............................................................................................................................... 7
Objectives ............................................................................................................................... 8
Literature Review .................................................................................................................... 9
4.1 Ring formation in lime kilns ............................................................................................ 9
4.2 Confined jets and recirculation ...................................................................................... 10
4.3 Ring formation and recirculation ................................................................................... 14
Experimental Apparatus ........................................................................................................ 16
5.1 Apparatus for flame visualization study ......................................................................... 16
5.1.1 Mini-diffusion burner .............................................................................................. 16
5.1.2 Transparent Kiln Shell ............................................................................................ 19
5.1.3 Flow Controllers ..................................................................................................... 20
[v]
5.1.4 Miscellaneous ......................................................................................................... 21
5.2 Apparatus for kiln wall temperature profile study ......................................................... 21
5.3 Data Processing .............................................................................................................. 23
5.4 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 23
Experimental Procedure and Observations ........................................................................... 24
6.1 Estimation of optimum air flow rate .............................................................................. 24
6.1.1 Objective and background ...................................................................................... 24
6.1.2 Procedure ................................................................................................................ 24
6.1.3 Observations ........................................................................................................... 25
6.2 Effect of ring position on flame behavior ...................................................................... 25
6.2.1 Objective and background ...................................................................................... 25
6.2.2 Procedure ................................................................................................................ 27
6.2.3 Observations ........................................................................................................... 28
6.3 Effect of ring position on flame behavior at varying ring thicknesses ........................... 29
6.3.1 Objectives and background ..................................................................................... 29
6.3.2 Procedure ................................................................................................................ 29
6.3.3 Observations ........................................................................................................... 29
6.4 Effect of ring position on flame characteristics at higher primary air flow rates ........... 31
6.4.1 Objectives and background ..................................................................................... 31
6.4.2 Procedure ................................................................................................................ 31
[vi]
6.4.3 Observations ........................................................................................................... 32
6.5 Effect of ring position on flame length with varying ring length ................................... 34
6.5.1 Objectives and background ..................................................................................... 34
6.5.2 Procedure ................................................................................................................ 34
6.5.3 Observations ........................................................................................................... 34
6.6 Effect of ring position on kiln wall temperature profile ................................................. 36
6.6.1 Objectives and background ..................................................................................... 36
6.6.2 Procedure ................................................................................................................ 36
6.6.3 Observations ........................................................................................................... 37
Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 39
7.1 Impact of primary air on flame length ........................................................................... 39
7.2 Impact of ring position on flame length ......................................................................... 42
7.2.1 Zone I ...................................................................................................................... 42
7.2.2 Zone II ..................................................................................................................... 43
7.3 Flame Speed and Flame Instability ................................................................................ 45
7.4 Impact of ring length on flame behavior ........................................................................ 46
7.5 Flame length and temperature profile of kiln ................................................................. 46
Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 48
Appendix A: Detailed drawings .................................................................................................... 49
A.1 Kiln hood ............................................................................................................................ 49
[vii]
A.2 Nozzle ............................................................................................................................... 49
A.3 Quartz tube kiln .................................................................................................................. 50
A.4 Honeycomb discs ............................................................................................................... 50
Appendix B ................................................................................................................................... 51
B.1 Equipment assembly protocol for flame visualization study ............................................. 51
B.1.1 Assembly of mini-diffusion burner ............................................................................. 51
B.1.2 Assembly for flame visualization ................................................................................ 51
B.1.3 Operating the equipment ............................................................................................. 52
B.1.4 Video recording equipment ......................................................................................... 52
B.2 Equipment assembly protocol for kiln wall temperature profile study .............................. 52
B.3 Image processing protocol ................................................................................................. 53
Appendix C: Calculations ............................................................................................................. 55
C.1 Calculation of total air requirement ................................................................................... 55
References ............................................................................................................................. 56
[viii]
List of Figures
Figure. 1. Kraft recovery process [3] .............................................................................................. 2
Figure 2. Lime kiln showing the direction of flow of mud inside it ............................................... 3
Figure 3. Severe ring formation in lime kiln (on left). .................................................................... 4
Figure 4. Typical lime kiln showing the different regions (not to scale) ........................................ 5
Figure 5. Cross section through a Turbulent Jet Diffusive (TJD) burner ....................................... 6
Figure 6. Ring formation in lime kilns: a vicious cycle in operation? ............................................ 7
Figure 7. Internal and external recirculation [8] ........................................................................... 11
Figure 8. External recirculation in a confined jet ......................................................................... 12
Figure 9. Parameters for calculation of Craya-Curtet number in a lime kiln [15] ........................ 13
Figure 10. Variation in flame shape with changes in operating conditions [18] .......................... 14
Figure 11. (a) Premix burner, (b) Kiln hood and (c) Honeycomb discs used in the experiment .. 18
Figure 12. Cross section through the mini-diffusion burner ......................................................... 18
Figure 13. Distribution of air in the burner ................................................................................... 19
Figure 14. Final assembly of mini-diffusion burner in the kiln shell ........................................... 20
Figure 15. P&ID of fuel and air flow controllers .......................................................................... 20
Figure 16. Refractory rings used in the study (from left to right: thickness of 1.5 cm, 2 cm and
2.5 cm respectively) ...................................................................................................................... 21
Figure 17. Experimental set-up to study kiln wall temperature profile ........................................ 22
Figure 18. Flame characteristics with varying primary air: .......................................................... 25
Figure 19. Ring position – distance of the ring from the burner ................................................... 26
[ix]
Figure 20. (a) Feret diameter of a random object along x-axis and y-axis. (b) Flame length
measured using the concept of Feret diameter .............................................................................. 27
Figure 21. Variation in flame length with ring position (6LPM Fuel at 15% PA) ....................... 28
Figure 22. Effect of ring thickness on flame length (top to bottom: 1.5 cm thick ring, 2 cm thick
ring, and 2.5 cm thick ring) ........................................................................................................... 30
Figure 23. Effect of thick rings on flame stability ....................................................................... 31
Figure 22. Effect of ring on flame length at high primary air ....................................................... 33
Figure 23. Variation in flame length with ring position for varying ring lengths ........................ 35
Figure 24. Effect of long rings on flame shape. For the 7.5 cm long ring, a glass piece was placed
in between the two rings ............................................................................................................... 35
Figure 25. Experimental kiln, after a 38-minute exposure. The ring can be seen present inside the
kiln ................................................................................................................................................ 37
Figure. 26. Effect of rings on temperature profile of kiln wall (ring @ 20 cm from burner) ....... 38
Figure 27. Effect of ring on temperature profile of kiln wall (ring @ 0cm from burner) ............ 38
Figure 28. Variation in flame shape with change in primary air ................................................. 40
Figure 29. Effect of recirculation on flame shape ......................................................................... 41
Figure 30. Zones of a diffusion flame ........................................................................................... 42
Figure 30. Thicker ring blows out flame when placed far away from the flame .......................... 44
Figure 31. Frames immediately before flame blow out when the ring was at 40 cm from burner 45
Figure 32. Cross section through kiln hood .................................................................................. 49
Figure 33. Side view of kiln hood ................................................................................................. 49
Figure 34. National N-2 torch tip – serves as the nozzle for primary jet ...................................... 49
[x]
Figure 35. Front view of the quartz tube ....................................................................................... 50
Figure 36. Honeycomb disc (large) – front view and side view ................................................... 50
Figure 37. Honeycomb disc (small) – front view and side view .................................................. 50
Figure 38. Steps in image data processing using ImageJ .............................................................. 54
1
Glossary
Term Definition
Calcination The process of heating limestone to obtain calcium oxide
Craya-Curtet number Signifies the ratio of momentum between the primary and
secondary jet in a confined jet, defined by Craya and Curtet
Feret’s Diameter (as used in ImageJ software)It is the largest distance between the
parallel lines restricting the object
Flame Length Length of the flame measured along horizontal axis
Honeycomb air-flow straighteners Air-flow straighteners built of ceramic with a honeycomb
structure, was used to straighten the flow of air in the kiln hood
Main fuel
Industrial burners are designed to operate on more than one fuel.
The main fuel could vary with mills, but this fuel port would
always be at the center of the burner
Mini-Diffusion Burner The diffusion burner assembled in the lab
Primary air Air supplied through the air-port of the premix burner
Ring Length Length of the ring measured along the axial direction of the kiln
Ring Thickness Length of the ring measured along the radial direction of the kiln
Secondary air Air supplied through the air-ports in the kiln hood
Swirl air Air supplied at a helical angle to the center fuel port, it helps in
improving internal recirculation
Total air The sum of stoichiometric air and excess air
Unstable flame A flame that blew out in less than a time span of one minute
during the experiments
2
Introduction: Kraft Recovery Process
The kraft recovery process uses cooking chemicals to de-lignify wood or separate pulp from
wood in a digester. The spent chemicals form a liquid stream called weak black liquor and are
separated while the pulp is sent for further processing.
Figure. 1. Kraft recovery process [3]
The weak black liquor is concentrated in evaporators to produce heavy black liquor and burned
in a recovery boiler to generate steam, which is used to power the plant. The chemicals are then
dissolved in water to produce green liquor which is then treated with lime to recover the cooking
chemical or white liquor. To complete the recovery process, the lime which gets converted into
lime mud (mostly calcium carbonate) is calcined in a long, cylindrical, rotary kiln to regenerate
lime as per the following reaction. [3]
𝐶𝑎𝐶𝑂3 → 𝐶𝑎𝑂 + 𝐶𝑂2
1.1 Lime Kilns
Lime kilns are rotary kilns, used in calcination of lime. Rotary kilns are also used in other
industries like cement manufacturing and drying of materials. However, owing to their
chemistry, lime kilns are different from the others. They are large steel tubes, lined with
refractory bricks on the inside. These kilns are slightly inclined from the horizontal and are
rotated at a set speed about their axis. Typical rotary kilns vary in size from 7ft (2.1m) in
3
diameter by 175ft (53m) long to as large as 15ft (4.6m) in diameter by 450ft (137.2m) long,
producing anywhere between 45 – 600 metric tons per day of lime. The massive weight of the
kiln is supported on riding rings/tires that encircle the kiln, which also provide the rotary motion
to allow movement of particles inside the kiln [4]. Figure 2 shows a lime kiln, and indicates the
direction of lime mud flow in it.
Figure 2. Lime kiln showing the direction of flow of mud inside it
Lime kilns operate as counter-current heat exchangers, by accepting the wet mud feed at the
higher end. The process of calcination is endothermic and the heat required is supplied by a
burner at the other end of the kiln. As the wet mud tumbles through the kiln due to its rotary
action and inclination, it gets heated gradually, dehydrated, finally undergoes calcination reaction
and is discharged from the lower end of the kiln as lime. The process gasses move through the
kiln, carrying with it the products of combustion and a significant amount of thermal energy.
While the capacity of a kiln is a function of its internal volume, the product quality would
depend upon the firing, feeding rate, operating temperature, and kiln speed or retention time [5].
4
1.2 Ring formation in kilns
As lime mud traverses the length of the kiln, it gradually gets converted to lime. Since this is a
dynamic process, a layer of lime dust is always present along the walls of the kiln. Whenever a
second layer of mud or lime is deposited on top of this layer, the bottom layer of lime is shielded
from the heat and undergoes recarbonation or a reverse reaction to form calcium carbonate that
sticks on to the refractory. With time, depending on the adhesiveness of the lime and lime mud,
more particles adhere and the formation grows into a ring. Often, these rings are very thin, and
the tumbling action of the mud destroys them. However, in severe cases (like the one shown in
Fig.3), rings can grow rapidly and lead to an unscheduled shut-down of the kiln in less than a
month [6].
Figure 3. Severe ring formation in lime kiln (on left). Pneumatic jack hammers have to be used to
remove these (as seen on right)
Based on their position inside the kiln, there are three types of rings that can form in lime kilns.
Mud rings, which are formed within 30 meters from the feed end are observed to be formed with
a high moisture content in the mud and when the feed temperature is low. They are usually soft,
but can grow rapidly. Mid-kiln rings occur in the middle of the kiln, and therefore, are the most
difficult to tackle. They are formed in the region constituting the calcination zone and up to about
30m from the front end. Figure 4 shows the regions inside the kiln where the different types of
rings can form. Since carbon dioxide and calcium oxide are always present in the calcination
zone, a temperature variation can lead to the recarbonation reaction:
𝐶𝑎𝑂 + 𝐶𝑂2 → 𝐶𝑎𝐶𝑂3
5
Even in an ideal kiln with no temperature fluctuations, the reversible nature of the calcination
reaction signifies that some amount of calcium oxide will undergo carbonation and form calcium
carbonate along the refractory layer. Deposition of dust on this surface will shield this layer from
the heat source and thereby prevent this layer from undergoing calcination. Thus, this layer of
carbonate thickens along the radius of the kiln. However, for it to grow along the axis and
withstand the constant attrition faced by the ever-tumbling lime mud, temperature fluctuations
are necessary. Temperature fluctuations inside the kiln will lead to formation of more zones
within the kiln which would favor recarbonation, thus resulting in ring growth along the axis of
the kiln [7].
Figure 4. Typical lime kiln showing the different regions (not to scale)
Front end rings are formed closest to the burner. Sulphation of calcium oxide, besides
recarbonation, can be a mechanism responsible for ring growth close to the burner. The
concentration of sulphur dioxide at the high temperature close to the burner is the driving force
for this sulphation reaction [6] [7].
The lime kiln is demanding in terms of its thermal energy requirements. Specific energy
consumption in a typical lime kiln is about 8.4 MMBtu/ ton of Calcium oxide [4].
1.3 Burner operation and ring formation
Burners are usually of two categories: premix burners and diffusion burners. In premix burners,
the fuel and air are first mixed in a chamber or a venture mixer, and then ignited once outside the
chamber. The mixing chamber is designed to efficiently mix fuel and air so that the mixture
ejecting from the mixing chamber may have a fuel-air ratio within the flammability range. This
may be ensured by providing the air and fuel at a constant designed flow rate and pressure [8].
These burners are usually used in small scale or at a laboratory scale.
6
Industrial burners are usually diffusion burners. In these burners, the mixing of fuel and air
happens outside the burner. The fuel stream is ejected into a slow-moving stream of air or
oxidizer. The difference in velocities of the fuel and air streams cause the air to entrain into the
fuel stream, thereby mixing with it, and increasing the air-fuel ratio to the flammability range. A
steady change in the concentrations of gasses may also be observed in such burners [8].
A distinctive character of a diffusion flame which favors its use in the industry is that the rate of
combustion is determined by the rate at which air and fuel are brought together in proportion for
combustion. This reduces the process control required to produce a steady combustion when
compared to that when using a premix burner [9].
Newer designs of burners tend to improve the efficiency of combustion by various mechanisms.
Figure 5. Cross section through a Turbulent Jet Diffusive (TJD) burner
Most of them are designed to operate using different fuel sources, giving the flexibility for the
mills to change their fuel according to the economic situation at hand. Figure 5 shows a
Turbulent Jet Diffusion burner (POLFLAME rotary kiln burner by Thyssenkrupp 2016).
The main fuel port supplies the main fuel, while the air is supplied through two different
channels. A primary air channel supplies about 6-20% of the total air, while the rest of the air is
supplied as secondary air. The primary air exits the burner as swirl air which helps to improve
the air-fuel mixing and the secondary air enters the kiln through the kiln hood.
Fuel ports
Swirl/ Primary Air
ports
7
Hypothesis
As discussed before, combustion happens outside the burner in a burner and happens in two
steps: first, bringing the fuel and air into contact, and second is maintaining the air to fuel ratio
within the explosive limit to sustain the combustion. The first step, of bringing the air and fuel
together is determined by recirculation, which again depends on many factors, as discussed later
in this document. Any obstruction to the air or fuel flow patterns could therefore affect the
combustion and therefore the performance of these burners.
Rings formed close to the burner (front end rings or mid-kiln rings) could possibly disrupt the
aerodynamics of burner operation, which could lead to further temperature fluctuations.
Following this, the initial layer of ring already formed on the kiln wall could grow by the
recarbonation mechanism. Moreover, rings could lead to flame impingement, because of which
the surface temperature of the rings may rise significantly.
Once the ring grows thicker, it could lead to even more flame impingement and temperature
fluctuation, and lead to ring growth again. Thus, a cycle could be in play during ring formation in
lime kilns (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Ring formation in lime kilns: a vicious cycle in operation?
?
Ring formation
Affect flame shape
Temperature fluctuations
8
Objectives
The objectives of this study are as follows:
• Determine if rings can induce changes in flame length and stability
• Observe the effects of ring position, thickness and length on flame length and stability
• Examine the effect of a ring on the temperature profile on the inner surface of a kiln
9
Literature Review
4.1 Ring formation in lime kilns
Ring formation in lime kilns is a very common problem in most pulp mills. Depending on the
severity of ringing, maintenance labor and make-up lime required, the expenses can increase to a
significant amount. Understanding the theory behind ring formation would help operators to
make modifications to standard operating procedures, and thereby, prevent or reduce the rate at
which rings form in kilns. Based on the type of ring formed, their composition can vary from the
initial mud composition to the final product composition. Mud rings are formed at lower
temperatures, close to the feed end of the kiln, thereby resulting in a composition like that of lime
mud. Mid-kiln rings and front-end rings have more calcium oxide (CaO) and calcium sulphate
(CaSO4) than mud rings. It has also been observed that mills that burn Non-Condensable Gasses
(NCG) or other fuels which have a high sulphur content, tend to have rings higher in sulphur
content (usually present as CaSO4). Another interesting observation is that rings formed in the
front end and mid-kiln sections of the kiln, where the gas temperatures are higher than the
calcining temperature, still contain some CaCO3 [6]. This observation supports the recarbonation
mechanism of ring formation.
For rings to form, it is necessary that materials first adhere to the surface of the refractory lining,
and then gain sufficient mechanical strength to resist the constant attrition caused by the
tumbling materials inside the kiln. Addition of sodium compounds (Na2CO3) to lime mud more
than 2% by weight resulted in increased adhesion, as observed by Tran et. al. in their
experimental kiln. These observations were made at temperatures of 9000C and 10000C [7].
The process by which rings gain strength and grow to disrupt operations may be explained using
the phenomena of recarbonation. When calcium carbonate is calcined in the lime kiln, the
products – lime and carbon dioxide, remain inside the environment of the kiln. A fall in
temperature can result in the backward reaction happening, forming calcium carbonate. Calcium
carbonate has more mechanical strength than calcium oxide. When a layer of calcium carbonate
is formed on the surface of the refractory lining (due to the reversible calcination reaction), and a
layer of calcium oxide gets deposited above this layer, the calcium oxide layer insulates the
calcium carbonate, and thereby prevents it from undergoing further calcination. A second coat of
calcium oxide would now shield the first layer of calcium oxide from high temperatures, and the
10
presence of carbon dioxide in this environment could lead to carbonation of the first layer of
calcium oxide. This process gets repeated and subsequently leads to an increase in thickness of
the ring [7].
This mechanism of ring growth is probable even in a kiln that is operated perfectly, the only
causes being the reversible nature of the reaction, and mechanical strength of calcium carbonate.
However, the rings formed in this case would thin and formed at the point where the temperature
inside the kiln is the same as the calcination temperature. The ring would be thin and weak, and
the high mass flow rate of material through the kiln would destroy this ring, and prevent it from
being catastrophic [7].
If a fluctuating temperature profile on the kiln wall is added to this ideal condition, it would
result in the ring growing in length along the axis of the kiln, since now, the calcination
temperature may be achieved in other cross sections along the length of the kiln. Therefore, even
though ring growth happens through recarbonation, fluctuation in temperature profile within the
kiln is necessary for the ring to grow in length along the axis and make it stronger. A primary
source of temperature fluctuation in the kiln is flame impingement. A ring of a significant size
can cause a local hot spot [10].
A second source of temperature fluctuation is the result of modifications in fluid flow patterns
caused by the ring. Since air-fuel mixing happens outside the burner, the ring can affect the fluid
flow patterns and thereby the air-fuel mixing. Understanding the fundamentals of a TJD burner
used in kilns is therefore necessary, to evaluate the situations that might lead to temperature
fluctuations within the kiln.
4.2 Confined jets and recirculation
As discussed before, the burners used in kilns are diffusion type. Recirculation is an important
concept that helps to sustain the combustion in a TJD burner. Once a flame has been established
in a diffusion burner, it would continue to burn only if it receives a feedback of heat energy from
the combustion zone to sustain the process of combustion. The two major mechanisms for this
process are re-radiation and recirculation. Of these, re-radiation happens due to the heat radiation
from the combustion zone and depends, to a great extent, on the fuel burnt and on the air-fuel
11
ratio. Recirculation, however, depends on the fuel and air flow patterns, which can be controlled
by the design of the burner and the kiln.
Recirculation happens when some of the flow in or around the burner is caused to move in a
direction opposite to that of the jet. It transports the hot combustion products back to the nozzle
or close to it. These hot combustion products raise the temperature of the fuel-air mixture to the
ignition temperature and sustain the combustion process. The process of recirculation may be
internal or external, as shown in figure 7. Furnaces with smaller volume tend to show little or no
external recirculation. Rotary kilns, however, have a high volume and therefore, have significant
external recirculation. This not only helps to confine the flame to a medium length and keep it
compact, but also protects the refractory walls from the extreme heat [8].
Figure 7. Internal and external recirculation [8]
To achieve recirculation in burners in lime kilns, the burners are designed so that the fuel ejects
out of the central port in the burner and the air flows around this – creating a confined jet. Due to
the small radius of the fuel port, the velocity of the fuel jet is higher than the air that flows
around it creating a local acceleration at point of contact between the fuel and air streams,
thereby causing an entrainment of air into the fuel jet. Since the entrainment of air into the fuel
jet happens inside a confined space (of the kiln), diffusion of air into the primary jet creates a
vacuum along the wall of the kiln, as shown in Figure 7. This creates zones of eddies, and results
in external recirculation [11]. External recirculation improves air-fuel mixing by creating
turbulence around the flame front [11, 8].
Internal recirculation is achieved in burners using swirl air. A small portion of the air required for
combustion is supplied as primary air via the swirl air-ports (as seen in figure 5). They are
introduced at a higher velocity than the surrounding air stream and at an angle so as to form a
12
helix around the fuel stream. The swirl air increases the air-fuel mixing, thereby increasing the
efficiency of combustion. However, this increase in efficiency is not without a cost since the
swirl air or the primary air is injected at a higher velocity than the air surrounding the jet, which
requires a higher fan power [8].
Figure 8. External recirculation in a confined jet
Figure 8 shows the recirculation patterns in a confined jet stream as explained by Craya and
Curtet. They developed a mathematical approach [11] and treats the difference in momenta
between the primary and the secondary jets to estimate a similarity parameter, 𝑚, which
quantifies the strength of recirculation. A number of studies have examined the criteria for
recirculation, both numerically and experimentally [12, 13, 14]. The criteria of recirculation for a
constant density system may be obtained by applying the momentum and continuity equations.
Assuming:
• shear stress at wall is negligible
• density is uniform
• flows of primary and secondary jets are uniform
• radial pressure gradient is neglected
Craya and Curtet defined the similarity parameter, 𝑚, as follows:
𝑚 = −1.5𝑅2 + 𝑅 + 𝐾𝑅𝑑1
𝑑0 (1)
Kiln Wall
Secondary Air Recirculation Zone
Entrainment of Secondary Air Burner
Mix of primary air and fuel
13
𝑅 = (𝑢0−𝑢1)𝜌0(
𝑑02
)2
𝑢1𝜌1(𝑑12
− 𝛿)2+(𝑢0−𝑢1)𝜌0(𝑑02
)2 (2)
where,
𝐾 = Jet shape factor, has a value of 1 for a round jet
𝑢0 = primary jet velocity
𝑢1 = secondary jet velocity
0 = density of primary jet
1 = density of secondary jet
𝑑0 = diameter of primary jet
𝑑1 = diameter of secondary jet
𝛿 = boundary layer thickness
In a lime kiln system, the above parameters may be represented as shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9. Parameters for calculation of Craya-Curtet number in a lime kiln [15]
Recirculation and the conditions necessary for recirculation have been extensively studied [12,
14, 13, 16]. While some studies were experimental, others used computational methods to
estimate the causes and effects of recirculation. It was noted that beyond a Reynolds number of
5000, a further increase in Reynolds number did not have an impact on the similarity parameter,
14
while below this value, a reduction in Reynold’s number reduced the value of the similarity
parameter. It was also estimated that when the similarity parameter is 1.5, the primary has
enough momentum in excess to that of the secondary jet to entrain the air required for complete
combustion of the fuel in the primary jet. Another important observation due to a reduction in
similarity parameter is the increase in flame length. At lower values of similarity parameter, the
flame requires more time to mix and undergo combustion, thereby increasing the flame length.
Figure 9 shows the different kinds of flame shapes possible in a kiln based on recirculation.
Increasing flame length leads to long flame that is buoyant and would therefore result in
lowering the heat flux available at the kiln wall.
4.3 Ring formation and recirculation
Figure 10. Variation in flame shape with changes in operating conditions [18]
Most lime kilns operate at a similarity parameter between 1.5 and 2 [17] to have sufficient
recirculation for a steady flame, but not too much recirculation to blow out the flame. The swirl
air, even though unaccounted for in the Craya Curtet similarity parameter, significantly increases
the air-fuel mixing by improving the internal recirculation [8]. However, if we neglect the effects
of the swirl air, and consider the similarity parameter alone, theoretically, a ring reduces
recirculation by reducing the inner diameter of the kiln shell. Subsequently, air-fuel mixing
reduces, thereby reducing the heat flux from the flame. It could also lead to a long, lazy and
buoyant flame which could impinge on the refractory causing significant refractory damage.
15
Both these cases could lead to a fall in temperature, which causes recarbonation leading to ring
growth and/or ring strengthening. Thus, ring growth could be accelerated over its course due to
the interaction between the flame and the ring.
As is evident from the literature review, a significant knowledge gap exists in the understanding
of the effects that a ring could have on the kiln by affecting the burner. Collection of data from
operating lime kilns is very difficult due to the extreme operating conditions of the kiln. The
complex heat and mass transfer mechanisms makes dynamic modelling of the system extremely
difficult. A solution to both these problems is to set up a laboratory model, which may be used to
study these effects. The next sections describe the experiment and discuss the results obtained.
16
Experimental Apparatus
The experiments conducted in this work may be broadly classified into two types: flame
visualization studies which focused on understanding the impact of rings on the visual
characteristics of the flame, and a temperature profile study, which focused on understanding the
effects of rings on the temperature profile of the kiln wall.
In the first part of the study, the visual appearance of the flame was studied extensively.
Characteristics of the flame like its length and stability were observed under different conditions,
like varying flow rates, and presence of rings of varying thickness and length at different
locations inside the kiln. The second part of the study was to understand the variations in
temperatures inside the kiln caused by the presence of the ring.
The apparatus for each of these studies are as follows.
5.1 Apparatus for flame visualization study
The apparatus for flame visualization study had three important components: a mini-diffusion
burner, a transparent kiln shell and flow controllers.
The mini-diffusion burner was the most important part of the apparatus. It was set-up so as to
mimic the operation of an industrial TJD burner. This mini-diffusion burner was used to fire into
a transparent kiln made of quartz tube, which facilitated an unobstructed view of the flame. A
ring of certain thickness and length was placed inside the quartz kiln at predetermined locations.
The burner was connected to air and fuel supplies via separate flow controllers to have a control
over the operating conditions of the burner.
Thus, the effect of different operating conditions of the burner, as well as the effect of variations
in properties of the ring, could be simulated in this apparatus. The following sections explain in
detail the construction of each piece of this apparatus.
5.1.1 Mini-diffusion burner
Configuring a laboratory scale turbulent jet diffusive burner was challenging for the following
reasons:
17
1. scale and complexity: increasing the scale would reduce the complexity in construction of
the burner, but it would make the burner too big and too dangerous to use in a laboratory
environment. Reducing the size, however, would increase the complexity of the burner.
2. buoyancy: The flame produced is always buoyant. The Froude number (Fr) is a
dimensionless number used to estimate the effects of buoyancy in a flame [8]. It may be
calculated as follows.
𝐹𝑟 ≡ (𝑣𝑜
2
𝑔𝑦𝑓) (3)
where,
𝑣𝑜 = axial velocity of the stream at the exit of the nozzle
𝑔 = acceleration due to gravity
𝑦𝑓 = flame height
The higher the Froude number, the less is the effect of buoyancy on the flame and vice-versa. To
reduce the buoyancy, therefore, a high velocity jet is required. However, increasing the
volumetric flow rate of the fuel would lead to a high heat flux, and would make the equipment
difficult to operate on a bench scale. Therefore, the only solution is to reduce the diameter of the
nozzle, to increase the velocity of the primary jet, but keep the volumetric flow rate of the fuel to
a minimum.
Due to the above-mentioned reasons, a mini-diffusion burner was set-up instead of a full-scale
TJD burner. The mini-diffusion burner was configured using a premix burner (Figure 11 a), a
kiln hood (Figure 11 b) and honeycomb discs (Figure 11 c). The premix burner was a standard
3A hand torch, supplied by National Torch with a 330-16S extension and an N-2 nozzle. It was
designed to accept fuel and air through the two ports. The burner was designed with air and fuel
lines opening into a common chamber, which ends in a burner tip, so that by the time the gasses
exit the burner, they are thoroughly mixed. This burner was placed co-axially inside a kiln hood,
using the honeycomb-discs as support. A cross section of the final assembly of the mini-diffusion
burner is as shown in Figure 12. A detailed drawing of the mini-diffusion burner assembly is
attached in Appendix A.
18
Figure 11. (a) Premix burner, (b) Kiln hood and (c) Honeycomb discs used in the experiment
Figure 12. Cross section through the mini-diffusion burner
The total air required for combustion was calculated based on the stoichiometry of combustion
reaction of methane, as shown in Appendix C. A small fraction of this air, the primary air, was
supplied to the system via the air-port of the premix burner. The rest of the air was supplied via
the secondary air-ports of the kiln hood. The following infographic clarifies the air distribution to
the burner.
Thus, a primary air stream was introduced into the system, which behaves like the swirl air in the
TJD burner, and a secondary air stream, which moves relatively slower than the primary jet. The
fuel, methane, was supplied via the fuel-port of the premix burner. The honeycomb discs serve
(a)
(b)
Burner Port Secondary Air-port
Secondary Air-port
Honeycomb disc
(c)
Premix
Burner
Secondary Air-port Kiln hood Honeycomb discs Nozzle
19
dual purposes: supporting the premix burner by helping it to align co-axially, and creating a
uniform flow of secondary air.
Figure 13. Distribution of air in the burner
A major difference in operation of the diffusion burner in the lime kiln and the experiment was
that while the burners in kilns are operated at a turbulent flow regime, the burner in the
experiment was operated in a laminar flow regime.
5.1.2 Transparent Kiln Shell
A major challenge faced in this study was the material of construction for the kiln shell – it has to
be a material that can withstand temperatures up to 14000C while being transparent at the same
time, so that the flame maybe observed. An operational kiln shell is made of iron and has a
coating of refractory materials on its inside, to reduce heat losses to minimum, which, however,
prevents optical exposure of the processes happening inside. Therefore, in this study, a
transparent kiln shell, made of quartz, was used to visually observe the changes happening to the
flame shape under different conditions. Quartz was an ideal material since it has a high
temperature resistance while being transparent at the same time.
The inner diameter of the tube was such that the kiln hood fits perfectly into the kiln shell. The
apparatus was configured by inserting the nozzle-side of the mini-diffusion burner into the kiln
shell. Different conditions were simulated inside the kiln by placing rings made of refractory
material inside the kiln. The whole setup was supported on steel blocks, after checking their
horizontality using a spirit level. Figure 14 illustrates the final burner-kiln shell assembly.
Stoichiometric Air
Excess Air
Total Air
Primary Air
Secondary Air
20
Figure 14. Final assembly of mini-diffusion burner in the kiln shell
The apparatus was placed on a laboratory bench, in such a position that video recordings of
experiments could be recorded with the least parallax error.
5.1.3 Flow Controllers
Accurate flow control was a requirement of this study due to the dependence of recirculation and
air-fuel mixing on the flow rates. While a manual flow meter was used to control the fuel flow
rate, computer-controlled Alicat (Model MCR 150) flow meters were used to control the primary
Figure 15. P&ID of fuel and air flow controllers
Met
han
e A
ir
21
and the secondary air flow rates. The P&ID of the setup is as shown in figure 15.
5.1.4 Miscellaneous
Besides the above-mentioned pieces of equipment, a video camera and refractory rings were
used in the study.
The camera was a Sony design, and used to record the runs. It was mounted on a tripod, and set
to capture videos at the maximum quality possible. Due to the extreme heat generated from the
experiment, it was impossible to carry out live measurements of the flame characteristics. The
video recording facilitated analysis at a later point in a safer environment.
Refractory rings were used to simulate the rings inside lime kilns. These rings were made of K-
26 refractory bricks. They were made in three sizes: 1.5 cm thick, 2 cm thick and 2.5 cm thick, as
shown in Figure 16. All of them had the same outer diameter, of 8.9 cm, so that they could be
placed inside the quartz kiln and the refractory kiln, which is described below.
Figure 16. Refractory rings used in the study (from left to right: thickness of 1.5 cm, 2 cm and
2.5 cm respectively)
5.2 Apparatus for kiln wall temperature profile study
Temperature is an important factor that determines the rate of ring formation. A modification of
flame shape will therefore, not affect the dynamics of ring growth, unless accompanied by
temperature fluctuation.
The apparatus to study the kiln wall temperature profile is similar to that used for the flame
visualization study. It uses the same mini-diffusion burner and the flow controllers. However, a
kiln made of refractory bricks is used in place of the kiln made of quartz.
22
Figure 17. Experimental set-up to study kiln wall temperature profile
A disadvantage of using the quartz glass tube as the kiln is that accurate temperature
measurements are difficult from the curved surface of the glass. To overcome this difficulty, a
kiln was made by drilling a hole through an assembly of 12 refractory bricks as shown in the
figure. These bricks had a temperature rating of 2600oF (1425oC). A solid block was made by
joining 12 refractory bricks along the long face using mortar. The hole drilled had a diameter of
90mm, so that the mini-diffusion burner can perfectly slide into this. Small holes, 2mm in
diameter, 2.5 cm apart, were drilled through the top face of the block, all the way up to the
central kiln. These holes would later be used to insert thermocouples into the kiln, to measure the
Burner Thermocouples
Thermocouples
23
temperature profile of the kiln wall. A 3-D model of the final assembly is as illustrated in Figure
17.
5.3 Data Processing
Characterizing the physical properties of a flame was quite challenging due to its dynamism. The
flame, therefore, had to be analyzed at each instant. The video was broken down into frames, and
each frame was analyzed for flame length to provide useful information. ImageJ (a free and open
source software) was used to analyze a series of 320 random frames, processing each to give the
feret diameter of the flame along the horizontal axis. Due to the large number of frames
considered, error was reduced significantly in the final readings.
5.4 Summary
To summarize, two series of experiments were conducted. While one was focused on analyzing
the changes in visual patterns of the flame under different conditions, the other was aimed at
understanding the variations in temperature profile of the kiln wall surface under different
process conditions. Studying the temperature profile of the kiln was necessary since temperature
is the driving force in ring formation and ring growth.
The main apparatus used in the study included a mini-diffusion burner, to simulate flow patterns
of a TJD burner, control valves for accurate flow control, a kiln made of quartz tube to visualize
the flame, and a kiln made of refractory bricks, to measure the temperature profile of the kiln
wall. Other apparatus included refractory bricks which were used to simulate rings inside the
kilns, and honeycomb air-flow straighteners, to aid in developing a fully developed flow of
secondary air in the burner.
24
Experimental Procedure and Observations
The steps for assembling the equipment for the flame visualization study and the kiln wall
temperature profile study are discussed in Appendix B. The study was conducted in steps as
explained in the following sections.
6.1 Estimation of optimum air flow rate
6.1.1 Objective and background
Since the mechanism of combustion and aerodynamics of the mini-diffusion burner plays a
major role in determining the flame shape and thereby the effects on rings, it was necessary that
a consistent and stable operating condition was first identified for the burner. The flame
produced by the burner depends on recirculation which can be varied by changing the primary
and secondary air flow rates.
Due to the small size of the kiln, high similarity parameters – similar to those in operating lime
kilns – cannot be used as they would blow out the flame. The mathematical estimation of these
values would require in-depth analysis of fundamentals, which would be extravagant for this
study. Therefore, a trial and error method was employed to estimate the ideal flow conditions to
operate the burner.
This study would also help us understand how recirculation, signified by the value of similarity
parameter, can affect the flame. Increasing the primary air flow rate increases the similarity
parameter and vice-versa.
6.1.2 Procedure
A step-by-step description for setting up the apparatus is given in Appendix B. The general
protocol was as follows: for a fixed flow rate of methane, primary air was varied from 0% of the
total air to 25% of total air.
Runs were now conducted at each of these flow conditions. Each run lasted for 1 minute and was
recorded using the video recorder. The experiment was then repeated to minimize error. The
flow conditions were calculated as given in Appendix C.
25
6.1.3 Observations
It was observed that as the primary air increased from 0% of total air to 15% of total air, the
flame length reduced and the flame became less buoyant. Its tint changed from yellowish to
bluish and became less sooty. The length of the flame that had a bluish tint increased gradually
with increase in primary air. Increasing the primary air further, to 25% of the total air, did not
reduce the flame length significantly. However, it resulted in an unstable flame which blew out
immediately. The observations from this run are presented in Figure 18 as snapshots from the
video recordings.
Figure 18. Flame characteristics with varying primary air: (a) PA 0% (b) PA 5% (c) PA 10% (d)
PA 15% (e) PA 20% (f) PA 25% (all values expressed in percentage of total air
6.2 Effect of ring position on flame behavior
6.2.1 Objective and background
Rings can form at different locations within the kiln. If the ring were to form at a location very
close to the hot end of the kiln (practically, this is less probable due to the ease of access to this
section of the kiln and any build up can be treated quickly), the only factor it may affect would
be the secondary air flow. However, if a ring forms further away, where the flame is expanding,
it would reduce the area available inside the kiln, thereby affecting the flow of secondary air.
Therefore, based on its position, the effect a ring can have on the flame may vary.
The main objective of the following experiment was to understand how rings can affect flames
based on their position. This may be understood by placing a ring at different locations inside the
kiln, which is operated at the same conditions. The primary variables in this study include ring
PA 0% PA 5% PA 10%
PA 15% PA 20% PA 25%
26
position and flame length. Ring position is defined as the distance of the ring from the burner,
inside the kiln. This is a set length, which is one of the defining conditions at which the
experiment is performed. Figure 19 illustrates the definition of ring position.
Figure 19. Ring position – distance of the ring from the burner
A primary variable that is studied in these series of experiments is the flame length. The flame
length can give us a lot of useful information about the flame. For example, a longer flame is an
indication that the air and fuel have been mixed slowly, which results in a longer time for
completion of combustion. However, measuring the length of the flame, which is dynamic, is a
very tricky proposition. A looming problem here is how to define the length of the flame. Some
authors previously used temperature profile to visualize flame [19, 20]. However, in this study
we are more interested in a comparison, rather than an absolute measurement of flame lengths.
As such, flame length is defined as the Feret diameter of the flame along the horizontal. The
Feret diameter is defined as the maximum distance or the caliper distance along a particular axis
for the given figure. Figure 20 gives an understanding of the Feret’s diameter and definition of
flame length. To estimate this, each run is recorded on a video recorder and analyzed frame by
frame using an image processing software. Flame length in each of these frames was analyzed,
and then an average flame length for each run was calculated. Details on image data processing
for calculating the flame length is given in Appendix B, section 9.3.
27
As evident from here, a drawback in this method is the use of a visual flame to measure its
length. Some portions of the flame may be barely visible to the naked eye, due to the chromatic
aberrations of the lens of the video recorder. To standardize the process, all the frames were
subject to the same processing techniques, to keep the results as uniform as possible.
Figure 20. (a) Feret diameter of a random object along x-axis and y-axis. (b) Flame length
measured using the concept of Feret diameter
6.2.2 Procedure
The equipment was set up by inserting the mini-diffusion burner into the experimental kiln made
of quartz. Gas connections were made as shown in P&ID in figure 14 and a ring, 1.5cm thick
was placed directly in front of the burner. The burner was ignited and fuel flow rate increased in
increments of 1.5 LPM to reach 6 LPM. Total air to be supplied was calculated as in Appendix
C, with an addition of 10% excess air. Primary air was set at a constant flow rate of 9.43 LPM
(15% of total air) and the run was recorded for a period of 1 minute. The ring was then moved
further away from the burner so that it is now 3 cm from the face of the burner. The burner was
operated and resulting flame video recorded, as in the previous case. The procedure was repeated
Feret diameter along x-axis
Feret
diameter
along y-axis
(a)
Flame Length
(b)
28
by changing the position of the ring with respect to the burner as indicated in the table below.
Beyond 40 cm, the ring seemed to have no effect on the flame and these runs were therefore
neglected.
The video recordings were separated into frames, and each frame analyzed individually to
measure the flame length. A detailed procedure followed has been explained in Appendix B.
6.2.3 Observations
Image analysis using ImageJ yielded the following curve between flame length and ring position
(Figure 21). A series of three experiments were conducted and the images from all the three were
randomly chosen to give the following result. Standard error was less than 2 mm and therefore,
error bars have been omitted from the figures.
Figure 21. Variation in flame length with ring position (6LPM Fuel at 15% PA)
The maximum flame length was observed when the ring was placed right in front of the burner.
As the ring is moved away from the burner, to a distance of 15 cm from the burner, the flame
length gradually decreases. Beyond this point, the effect of ring position is negligible on the
flame length. However, the flame is significantly longer than when there is no ring.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)
Ring Position (cm)
PAF 0.15
No Ring 0.15
With RingWith ring
Without Ring
29
6.3 Effect of ring position on flame behavior at varying ring thicknesses
6.3.1 Objectives and background
Ring thickness is the thickness of the ring measured along its diameter. In lime kilns, rings
formed can vary in thickness. Rings, when thin, do not pose much of a problem in operation of a
lime kiln [6], while thicker rings have to be removed and might require a kiln shut-down –
leading to additional cost. The thickness of rings change the available area for air flow inside the
kiln, which might affect recirculation patterns and thereby affecting the burner operation.
However, as observed in the previous section, the position of a ring can also affect the flame.
Therefore, it is necessary to include the position of ring with respect to the burner while studying
the effects of its thickness. The methodology described in the following section is aimed at
collecting information that can shed light on the effect of ring thickness on flame behavior.
6.3.2 Procedure
The equipment assembly was similar to that used for studying effects of flame on ring position
(as described in section 5.2.2). The primary air flow rate was set to be 15% of the total air to be
supplied. Total air to be supplied was calculated as given in Appendix C, corresponding to 6
LPM of methane flow. An excess air of 10% of the primary air was supplied.
Initially, the 1.5 cm thick ring was used. Next, the run was repeated by replacing the ring with
the 2 cm thick ring and later, with the 2.5 cm thick ring. Runs were conducted by placing the
rings, one after the other, at varying locations from the burner as in the previous experiment.
Each run was conducted for one minute, or until the flame blew out, whichever happened earlier.
Video recordings of the experiments were captured, and processed as per the image processing
protocol as explained in Appendix B, section 7.3.
6.3.3 Observations
Flame length versus ring positions for the three different rings is as shown in figure 22. During
this series of runs, sometimes the flame blew out, and these have been represented in the figure
with a flame length of 0 cm. A plot of flame length versus ring position is as follows.
30
Figure 22. Effect of ring thickness on flame length (top to bottom: 1.5 cm thick ring, 2 cm thick
ring, and 2.5 cm thick ring)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)
Ring Position (cm)
No Ring
2 cm Ring
Without Ring
With Ring
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)
Ring Position (cm)
PAF 0.15
No Ring 0.15Without Ring
With Ring
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)
Ring Position (cm)
No Ring
2.5 cm Ring
Without Ring
With Ring
1.5
cm
thick
ring
2 c
m th
ick rin
g
2.5
cm
thick
ring
31
Figure 23. Effect of thick rings on flame stability
Increasing the ring thickness from 1.5 cm to 2.5 cm for a ring placed right in front of the burner
leads to flame blow out. The thicker rings blew out the flame when placed close to the burner. It
may also be noted that thicker rings, when kept within 15 cm of the burner, reduced the flame
length significantly, as compared to the flame length while using a 1.5 cm ring. The flame
lengths while using 2 cm and 2.5 cm thick rings, at distances less than 10 cm from the burner,
were equal to or less than that while not using any rings.
6.4 Effect of ring position on flame characteristics at higher primary air flow rates
6.4.1 Objectives and background
Increasing the primary air flow rate increases the similarity parameter, and thereby the
recirculation. We may calculate similarity parameter, 𝑚, using equations 1 & 2. At a fuel flow
rate of 6 LPM, total air flow rate of 62.86 LPM, and when 20% of the total air is supplied as
primary air, the similarity parameter is calculated to be 0.6. When primary air is increased to
22% of total air, the similarity parameter increases to 0.66, while decreasing the primary air to
17% of total air reduces the similarity parameter to 0.51.
6.4.2 Procedure
For this experiment, the burner was operated at a constant fuel flow rate, but varying primary air
flow rates. Initially, it was run at a primary air flow rate equal to 22% of the total air supplied,
Ring at 0 cm Ring at 15 cm Ring at 30 cm
32
followed by 20%, and 17% respectively. At each of these flow rates, the 1.5 cm thick ring is
placed at different distances from the burner: 0 cm, 3 cm, 6 cm, 9 cm, 12 cm, 15 cm, 20 cm, 25
cm, 30 cm, and 40 cm.
Once the apparatus has been set up as described in the previous sections, the primary air flow
rate is set to the 13.83 LPM and secondary air flow rate to 49.03 LPM, which corresponds to
22% of total air supplied as primary air. The 1.5 cm thick ring is placed right in front of the
burner. A one-minute video recording of the run, after the fuel flow rate reaches its final value
(6LPM) is captured. Next, the ring was moved to its next location (3 cm) and the run is repeated.
Once, runs have been completed at all the ring positions, primary air flow rate is changed to
12.57 LPM and secondary air flow rate to 50.29 LPM. The runs are then repeated by varying the
ring positions. Next, primary and secondary air flow rates were set to 10.69 LPM and 52.17 LPM
respectively, and the runs were repeated by varying the ring positions.
6.4.3 Observations
The effects of rings on flames while changing the primary air flow rates were interesting. At a
primary air flow rate of 13.83 LPM, which corresponds to 22% of the total air, the flame blows
out in the absence of a ring. Placing a ring right in front of the burner or at 3 cm from it did not
change this behaviour. However, when the ring was placed at positions 6 cm, 9 cm, and 12 cm
away from the burner, the flame did not blow out.
A flame that blew out is represented by a flame length of 0 cm. At a primary air flow rate of
12.57 LPM (20% of total air), the effect of rings on the flame characteristics is different from
that in the above case. In the absence of a ring, the flame is unstable in these process conditions
and blows out. However, placing the ring between 3 cm and 20 cm from the burner, prevents the
flame from blowing out.
When the primary air flow rate was reduced to 10.69 LPM, (17% of total air), the flame behavior
was affected by the ring in a manner similar to that when primary air was 15% of total air. The
flame remained steady and was not blown out.
Figure 22 shows the results from these observations.
33
Figure 22. Effect of ring on flame length at high primary air (from top to bottom: 17%, 20% and
22% primary air). X-axis represents ring position in all the cases.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)PAF 0.22
No Ring 0.22Without Ring
With Ring
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)
PAF 0.2
No Ring 0.2Without Ring
With Ring
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)
Ring Position (cm)
PAF 0.17
No Ring 0.17Without Ring
With Ring
34
6.5 Effect of ring position on flame length with varying ring length
6.5.1 Objectives and background
The length of a ring, in this context, is defined as the length of the ring along the axis of the kiln.
Rings formed in lime kilns, which can disrupt operations, are often long and thick [7]. A long
ring can reduce the volume inside the kiln area by a significant amount. The following
experiment was set-up to study the effects a long ring would have on flame shapes when placed
at different locations within the kiln, while other conditions like primary air remained constant.
6.5.2 Procedure
To study the effect of long rings, runs were conducted by placing three rings of varying length
(2.5 cm, 5 cm, and 7.5 cm) at different positions inside the kiln. All the rings had the same
thickness (2 cm) and the operating conditions of the burner were maintained the same through
these runs. A 2.5 cm long ring was the same ring used previously. Two of these rings were
placed together to simulate a ring that is 5 cm long. A 7.5 cm long ring was configured by
placing two rings, supporting a glass piece between them.
6.5.3 Observations
Figure 23 shows the observations from the experiment. As the ring length increased from 2.5 cm
to 5 cm, the flame length increased significantly. The flame still blew out when the ring was
placed right in front of the burner or when placed more than 30 cm away from it and increasing
the ring length from 5 cm to 7.5 cm had no significant difference. These observations suggest
that ring thickness plays a major role in determining the flame shape. Increasing the ring length
can increase the flame length, presumably due to the reduction in volume inside the kiln.
Figure 24 shows the images from the experiments conducted to study the effect of ring length on
flame length. The 7.5 cm rings were constructed by placing a glass piece in between the two
rings.
35
Figure 23. Variation in flame length with ring position for varying ring lengths (primary air was
15% of total air, fuel flow rate was 6 LPM)
Figure 24. Effect of long rings on flame shape. For the 7.5 cm long ring, a glass piece was
placed in between the two rings
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Fla
me
Len
gth
(cm
)
Ring Position (cm)
Ring length (cm)
7.5
5
2.5
0
(no ring)
36
6.6 Effect of ring position on kiln wall temperature profile
6.6.1 Objectives and background
As discussed before, temperature plays an important role in the recarbonation mechanism. Any
changes to flame behavior, therefore, if not associated with a temperature change, may not be
sufficient to promote ring growth.
The results obtained from the above tests suggest that having a ring inside the kiln affects the
flame length. Flame length is a measure of the combustion reaction zone in the flame [8]. Having
a longer flame, therefore, corresponds to having a longer reaction zone, which would lead to a
reduced heat flux from the flame. Thus, if the ring were to affect the combustion reaction itself,
this change in flame length should have an impact on the temperature profile of the kiln wall.
Experiments were carried out to examine if a change in flame length produced by a ring can
cause a temperature fluctuation on the kiln wall.
6.6.2 Procedure
The apparatus to study the kiln wall temperature profile was set up by inserting the burner into a
kiln made from refractory bricks. The kiln was designed by drilling a hole through an assembly
of refractory bricks, which are as shown in Figure 17. Thermocouples were inserted into this
channel so as to measure the kiln wall temperature. Rings were introduced inside the assembly
and temperatures were measured.
Since the heat transfer is unsteady, an approximation was employed to heat the kiln to a constant
temperature. Steady state was assumed when the temperature variation was less than 1 0C/ min.
Correspondingly, each run had to be 40 minutes long, so that a steady state temperature
measurement could be made. After each 40-minute long run, the apparatus was allowed to cool.
The first run was conducted without a ring in the kiln, at fuel flow rate of 6 LPM and primary air
flow rate corresponding to 15% of total air (9.43 LPM). Following this, the run was repeated
with the 1.5 cm thick ring placed right in front of the burner at the same flow rate. Next, the run
was repeated without the ring and later with the ring placed at 20 cm from the burner.
37
6.6.3 Observations
Figure 25 is a photograph of the experimental setup from its side at the end of a run. The kiln
became red hot uniformly on the inside.
Figure 25. Experimental kiln, after a 38-minute exposure. The ring can be seen present inside
the kiln
The temperature profile of the kiln after the two runs is as shown in figure 26 and figure 27. As
discussed in section 5.2, flame length when a ring is placed inside the kiln was longer than that
when there was no ring in the kiln. The brick kiln deteriorated under the thermal stresses it
underwent. This resulted in heat loss from the kiln, leading to a lower kiln wall temperature
profile in the second run (figure 27).
38
Figure. 26. Effect of rings on temperature profile of kiln wall (1.5cm thick ring @ 20 cm from
burner)
Figure 27. Effect of ring on temperature profile of kiln wall (1.5cm thick ring @ 0cm from
burner)
250
350
450
550
650
750
850
950
1050
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Kil
n W
all
Tem
p. (0
C)
Distance from Burner (cm)
No Ring
Ring @ 20 cm
250
350
450
550
650
750
850
950
1050
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Tem
per
ature
(0C
)
Distance from burner (cm)
Ring @ 0 No Ring
39
x
Discussion
7.1 Impact of primary air on flame length
As observed in section 5.1.3, flame length had a high correlation with primary air flow rate.
Examining the similarity parameters associated with these primary air flow rates helps to analyze
this observation better.
Figure 28 shows the flame obtained when all the air required is supplied as secondary air via the
kiln hood. The theory of recirculation in confined jets as explained by R Curtet [11] can explain
this observation. Using equation 1 & 2 and the dimensions of the burner from Appendix A, the
similarity parameter in this run is 0.09, which indicates very little mixing [11]. Thus, the majority
of the methane exiting from the nozzle is diffusing at a slow rate into the slow moving secondary
air around it. Once this mixture comes in contact with an ignition source, it undergoes
combustion. Since the rate of diffusion of methane is slow, it takes a long time to mix with air,
by which time it would have travelled a longer distance than when the similarity parameter is
higher. Since the longer flame indicates a larger combustion zone, its density would be lesser and
therefore, becomes buoyant.
Increasing the primary air flow rate, increases the similarity parameter, which signifies better air-
fuel mixing. The primary jet, which is now at a higher velocity, undergoes more rapid
combustion. However, the majority of the fuel still escapes from this zone without getting mixed
with air. This fuel, then gradually comes in contact with the slow moving secondary air, leading
to a slow rate of combustion, elongating the flame and making it buoyant. As may be observed
from Figure 28, the flame would be less buoyant close to the burner while away from it, it
becomes buoyant, similar to the flame in the previous case.
Increasing the primary air flow rate to 10% and 15% of the total air improves the similarity
parameter (to 0.32 and 0.45 respectively) and thereby the mixing, which is evident from the
shorter flames as shown in figure 30. Thus, it may be concluded that primary air plays an
important role in mixing of fuel with air, and thereby, the flame length and its behavior.
40
Figure 28. Variation in flame shape with change in primary air
However, it was also observed that primary air flow rate, (20% and 25% of total air) beyond a
certain value, blew out the flame (figure 24 & 25). To understand this occurrence, it is important
to understand the similarity parameter as a measure of the strength of recirculation eddies.
Increasing values indicate stronger recirculation. Figure 29 illustrates how the streamlines may
be formed around the flame front. As illustrated in figure 29, when the recirculation eddies get
stronger, they push more of the secondary air into the combustion zone. This increases the air-
fuel ratio in the combustion region and thereby starves the flame of methane.
0% primary
air
5% primary
air
10% primary
air
15% primary
air
41
Figure 29. Effect of recirculation on flame shape: (a)When recirculation is present, but not
strong enough to blow out a flame; (b) High recirculation deflects more secondary air into the
combustion zone
These results are similar to the results obtained by Alyaser [21] where a pilot kiln was used to
study the effects of primary air on flame shape and temperature profile. It was observed that
decreasing the primary air flow rate increases the flame length and flattens the flame temperature
profile. However, the primary air flow rates used were different than those of this study.
Extending these results to the lime kiln, it means that very strict control of primary and
secondary air flow rates must be maintained in order to maintain a constant temperature profile.
Premix Burner
Secondary Air Recirculation eddies
Quartz Tube
Entrainment of secondary air
(a)
Combustion
products
Quartz Tube
Flame front
Secondary Air Strong recirculation eddies push the flame front
inwards which can blow out the flame
Premix Burner
Entrainment of secondary air
(b)
Combustion zone
42
Any change in primary air flow rate leads to a change in the flame shape and can affect the
temperature profile inside the kiln.
7.2 Impact of ring position on flame length
As seen in sections 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4, ring position can significantly affect flame length. Rings
may affect flames via different mechanisms, as explained below. Since the concept of
recirculation in enclosed jet flames has not been extended to consider obstructions in the path of
the secondary jet, an approach that includes, but is not limited to recirculation, is taken here.
Figure 30. Zones of a diffusion flame
Based on the behavior of a flame in the presence of a ring, three different zones may be
identified here: Zone I – a zone of mixing, where majority of air-fuel mixing happens and is in
front of the burner; Zone II – a zone of combustion where majority of combustion occurs, which
is cone-shaped with its axis at the center of the nozzle; Zone III – a zone of expanding
combustion products (figure 30).
Placing the ring in different zones affects recirculation in different ways.
7.2.1 Zone I
This region may be divided into two different zones, based on the kind of air-fuel mixing
happening – a zone where entrainment of secondary air is predominant, and a zone where
recirculation eddies are predominant.
Premix Burner
Secondary Air Recirculation eddies
Quartz Tube
I - Mixing Zone
III - Zone of expanding products
II - Combustion
Zone
Flame front
43
A ring in the zone where entrainment of secondary air is occurring would deflect the secondary
air into the combustion zone, and thereby improve the mixing. Thus, if a ring placed in this zone
were to be replaced by a thicker ring, it would deflect more air into the combustion zone,
improving the mixing resulting in a shorter flame, as evident from figure 22. The flame gets
shorter with the use of thicker ring, when they are placed close to the flame.
Away from the burner, the recirculation eddies become stronger and become the primary
mechanism of air-fuel mixing. A ring placed in this zone of recirculation, reduces the
recirculation by breaking down the recirculation eddies. As discussed before, higher primary air
flow rates are associated with higher similarity parameters and stronger recirculation. As
illustrated in the observations of section 5.4, at high primary air flow rates, it was observed that
the introduction of a ring at a specific region within the kiln stabilized the flame, and it no longer
blew out.
Thus, a ring in the mixing zone closer to the burner, where mixing happens by entrainment of
secondary air, improves mixing and increases the efficiency of combustion, while rings placed
further away in the mixing zone, where mixing happens by recirculation, reduces recirculation
and decreases the efficiency of combustion.
Applying these results to an operational lime kiln a-priori would mean that ring growth in the
mixing zone would increase the efficiency of air-fuel mixing. This would lead to an increase in
flame temperature and thereby prevent further ring formation. However, a ring formed further
downstream, in the recirculation zone, would lead to a reduction in flame temperature by
reducing the air-fuel mixing. This could lead to a reduction in temperature and thereby,
accelerate ring formation.
7.2.2 Zone II
Rings, placed in Zone II are observed to increase recirculation. A probable reason for this could
be due to the reflection of fast moving combustion products against the ring surface. The
combustion reaction increases the kinetic energy of the air fuel mixture. The faster, heavier
stream of combustion products, now move through the kiln at a higher velocity than the primary
or the secondary jets.
44
In the absence of a ring, the secondary air gets entrained into the primary jet due to the negative
pressure created by the velocity difference between the primary jet and the secondary jet.
However, in the presence of a ring at 40 cm, the fast moving combustion products collide against
the ring surface, and reflect. This reflected stream would now have to turn back and push the
recirculation eddies, thereby increasing the strength of recirculation. The increased strength of
recirculation increases the concentration of air in the primary jet and blows out the flame.
Figure 30. Thicker ring blows out flame when placed far away from the flame
The thicker the ring, the greater the reflected combustion products, and the more effective would
be the ring in blowing out the flame. This could be a possible reason for the observations in
section 5.2 and 5.3, where the thicker rings blew out the flame when they were placed towards
the end of the flame (30 cm and 40 cm).
A closer look at the video recording of this run can throw more light on this. Figure 31 shows a
few snapshots just before the flame blew out in a run where the ring was place 40 cm away from
the ring.
Kiln wall
Hot expanding
combustion products
Thick Ring
Thin Ring
45
Figure 31. Frames immediately before flame blow out when the ring was at 40 cm from burner.
Imaginary streamlines show how recirculation eddies might be causing flame blow out
As can be seen here, there appears to be a draft blowing around the flame, at some distance,
about 3-10 cm away from the burner, which initially causes flame lift-off and later blows out the
flame. This could be an effect of recirculation.
Applying these results to an operational lime kiln suggests that rings formed ahead of the
combustion zone would increase recirculation. The effectiveness of the ring in blowing out the
burner flame or making it unstable would depend on its thickness. However, the ability of this
increase in recirculation to blow out the flame must be further studied, since an operational kiln
would have a greater diameter to length ratio than the experimental kiln. This could dilute the
effect observed in the experiment.
7.3 Flame Speed and Flame Instability
Flame speed, also called burning velocity or flame velocity is defined as the velocity at which
unburned particles move through the combustion zone in direction normal to the wave surface.
The major theories for predicting flame velocity for a premixed flame consider the diffusion of
air and fuel particles through the flame medium, and the propagation of heat backwards through
the gas layers. Flame velocities for hydrocarbon-air flames are about 40cm/s while for hydrogen-
air flames are about 2m/s, due to the higher diffusivity of hydrogen. An increase in pressure
reduces the flame velocity while a decrease in pressure increases it [9].
t = 1/60 s
t = 6/60s t = 5/60 s
t = 4/60 s t = 3/60 s
t = 2/60s
46
However, for a diffusion flame, the concept of flame velocity is a bit different. The combustion
process is assumed to happen in smaller flamelets, which is one-dimensional. The flamelet has
the air-fuel mixture in a stoichiometric ratio and is ready to undergo the combustion reaction.
The flame propagates in a direction perpendicular to the flame front in this flamelet [22].
In this study, the jet speed of the primary air and methane mixture ejects out of the burner at
speeds ranging from 2 m/s to 5.9 m/s, which is five to fourteen times the typical laminar flame
velocity of a hydrocarbon-air flame for a premixed flame. Thus, if the flame speed were to affect
the flame stability, it would have affected all the observations equally.
7.4 Impact of ring length on flame behavior
The behavior of a flame in the presence of a long ring is consistent with the theory discussed so
far. With the ring position and ring thickness being the most important variables, a long ring
merely forces the flame to elongate, thereby increasing the flame length. This could be because
of the reduction in volume inside the kiln, which increases the flow rates of the fuel and air. A
faster moving fuel now undergoes combustion, thereby elongating the flame. However, placing
this ring before the zone of entrainment can blow out the flame, possibly by reducing the volume
available for air-fuel mixing. In summary, long rings can affect a flame only when placed in
regions where air-fuel mixing is strongest. Placed at other positions, they affect the flame based
only on their thickness and position.
7.5 Flame length and temperature profile of kiln
Any phenomenon that affects flame length, unless accompanied by a corresponding change in
the temperature profile of the kiln, will be ineffective in causing ring growth or ring formation.
This is because temperature is one of the basic driving forces in ring formation [7]. The
observations from section 5.3 make it clear that changes in flame length are associated with a
change in temperature profile within the kiln. Assuming equal completion of combustion, the
heat flux from a longer flame will be less than that from a shorter flame. As discussed in
previous sections, introducing a ring at 20 cm from the burner increases the flame length. The
temperature profile of the flame with a ring at 20 cm from the burner results in a lower
temperature profile than without a ring. The point of highest temperature also shifts away from
the burner. This suggests an extension in the length of the flame and the temperature profile
47
associated it. Thus, it may be concluded that a change in length a of flame is also associated with
a change in temperature profile.
In an operational lime kiln, these results imply that a ring present inside the kiln at a specific
location could lower the temperature profile of the kiln wall. Recall that a reduction in
temperature can increase the rate of growth of rings by the recarbonation mechanism.
48
Conclusions
A systematic study was conducted to examine how ring formation in a lime kiln affects the
burner flame. The study was aimed at gaining a fundamental understanding of the interaction
between ring formation and the operation of a turbulent jet diffusion burner in a lime kilns. Main
conclusions drawn from this study are:
1. Primary air is important for flame stability. Increasing primary air flow rate up to a
certain value, improves fuel mixing and produces a compact and stable flame. Increasing
the primary air flow rate beyond a certain value blows out the flame, which could be due
to very strong recirculation currents, while decreasing it would reduce the amount of
recirculation, and makes the flame buoyant and long. The primary air flow rate which can
blow out a flame may vary from kiln to kiln, depending on its size.
2. Ring position can affect flame shape and stability. When rings are very close to a burner,
they help improve the air-fuel mixing and thereby make the flame shorter and more
compact. Rings that are farther from the burner reduce mixing, possibly by breaking the
recirculation eddies present in this region. When rings are outside the combustion zone,
they have a tendency to blow out the flame, depending on their thickness.
3. Ring thickness can affect flame stability and shape greatly. Thicker rings have a greater
tendency to blow out flames than thin rings.
4. The length of rings affects the flame shape only when placed within the combustion zone
of the flame. Longer rings elongate flames by reducing the volume inside the kiln. When
placed outside the region of the flame, the flame behavior is affected only by the
thickness and position of the ring.
5. Variation in flame length alters the temperature profile of the kiln wall. This could be due
to the change in heat flux associated with change in flame length. As a result, a longer
flame would produce a temperature profile that is lower than a shorter flame.
Thus, rings can affect flame shapes, and in some of these cases, even lead to a decrease in
temperature, by creating unstable flames, which can cause more ring formation in lime kilns.
49
Appendix A: Detailed drawings
A.1 Kiln hood
Figure 32. Cross section through kiln hood
Figure 33. Side view of kiln hood
A.2 Nozzle
Dia. Of each hole: 1.5 mm
Number of holes: 28
Figure 34. National N-2 torch tip – serves as the nozzle for primary jet
11.4
cm
38.5 cm
11.4
cm
8.9
cm
Port for Secondary Air
50
A.3 Quartz tube kiln
Figure 35. Front view of the quartz tube
A.4 Honeycomb discs
Figure 36. Honeycomb disc (large) – front view and side view
Figure 37. Honeycomb disc (small) – front view and side view
9 c
m
150 cm
11.4 cm
1 cm
2.5 cm
8.9 cm
1 cm
2.5 cm
51
Appendix B
B.1 Equipment assembly protocol for flame visualization study
B.1.1 Assembly of mini-diffusion burner
First, two large honeycomb discs, and one small honeycomb disc is placed inside the wide
section and narrow section of the kin hood respectively. Next, the tip extension of the premix
burner is attached to the burner and is inserted into the kiln hood, from the broader end, ensuring
it passes through the central holes of the honeycomb discs as well. To seal the gap between the
burner extension and the hole in the kiln hood base, a resin based gasket sealant is applied.
Proper support to the torch extension has to be ensured so that the premix burner may be parallel
to the axis of the kiln hood. Once the sealant is hardened, the tip maybe attached to the torch
extension.
Primary air connection from the pipeline or from a compressed air cylinder is connected to the
inlet of the flow controller, via a ball valve and a pressure indicator and the outlet of the flow
controller is connected to the air supply port of the premix burner. The same procedure is
repeated for secondary air, except that the outlet is connected via a t-connector to the two
secondary air ports of the kiln hood. Next, the methane line is connected to the flow meter, and
from its outlet to the fuel port of the premix burner.
B.1.2 Assembly for flame visualization
The mini-diffusion burner is now ready to be used in the flame visualization study. To set this
up, we first place the quartz kiln on the metal supports, after ensuring its horizontality using
spirit level. Next, the mini-diffusion burner is inserted into the quartz kiln. Metal supports are
now placed under the burner, ensuring that they take the complete load of the burner. Any stress
on the quartz tube can break the glass. Once the supports are in place and the setup is stable, a
duct tape is wound around the joint between the burner and the kiln to prevent any sort of
leakages. If a ring has to be used in the study, the ring has to placed inside the kiln first, and then
the burner inserted and sealed. Next, a 900 bend of GI pipe is inserted into the other end of the
quartz kiln, so as to direct the exhaust gasses into the chimney, present right above the set-up. A
carbon monoxide detector has to be placed close to the setup for safety reasons.
52
Before beginning the experiment, any leakages in the setup has to be determined. To do this, the
connection from primary and secondary air cylinders are connected to nitrogen cylinders. An
oxygen analyzer is connected to the exhaust stream, and the system is flushed with nitrogen. Any
leakages in the system would be detected by oxygen in the exhaust gasses.
B.1.3 Operating the equipment
Once the system has been set-up and ensured that it is leak-proof, the equipment is ready for
operation. Firstly, the primary and secondary air flow rates have to be entered into the flow
controller using a laptop. To control the flow controller using a laptop, a USB to RS-232 driver
has to be installed. It converts the USB signals from the laptop to the RS 232 connection of the
flow controller. Once the air flow rates are fixed, the methane flow to the flow controller is
switched on using the ball valve on the methane cylinder. The mini-burner should be placed such
that its nozzle is accessible. Using a lighter, the burner is lighted by increasing the methane flow
rate in flow controller. Once a small stable flame has been established, the mini-diffusion burner
is fitted back into the quartz kiln. A layer of sealant tape is applied and the fuel flow rate is
gradually increased, till it reaches full flow.
B.1.4 Video recording equipment
The video recorder has to be placed at a safe distance from the whole setup, so as to minimize
exposure to the high heat. Also, this helps it to have a wider field of vision, so as to capture the
entire flame length. The recorder has to be mounted on a stand, and the zoom has to be set so that
about half of the kiln is visible.
Once the experiment is ready to be accept methane, the recorder is turned on. This is because, in
some runs, the flame may get extinguished even before reaching the full value of fuel flow.
B.2 Equipment assembly protocol for kiln wall temperature profile study
The equipment for analyzing the kiln wall temperature profile is similar to the equipment used
for flame visualization, except that the kiln used in this case is made of refractory bricks. To set
up this experiment, first the kiln is wound in glass wool to reduce the heat loss to the
surroundings. Next, thermocouples are inserted into the kiln through the small holes in the top of
the kiln. Care has to be taken to ensure that the thermocouples are flushed with the wall of the
53
kiln and do not extend into the volume of the kiln. This is because a thermocouple flushed with
the surface of the kiln would measure the kiln wall temperature, while a thermocouple in the
volume of the kiln would measure the flame temperature, which would be higher. The
thermocouples are then connected to RTD signal converters, which are connected to laptop to
record the values.
Once the kiln has been set up with the temperature measuring equipment in place, the burner is
introduced into the system. The burner, once its assembled, can easily be slid into the opening of
the kiln. Therefore, the burner is first ignited at a low fuel flow rate, and then slid into the kiln.
However, unlike in flame visualization study, the fuel flow rate has to be increased very
gradually. This is because the refractory bricks are less resistant to thermal shock and may give
way if the heat is cranked up at a quick rate. To ensure least thermal shock as possible, the fuel
flow rate was increased by 10% when the rate of temperature rise in the kiln fell to less than 20C
per second.
For a subsequent run, the kiln was allowed to cool down to room temperature. A ring was placed
inside the kiln, if required and the experiment repeated. For each run with a ring, a blank run
without a ring was performed before it. This was because the refractory brick breaks down after
each run, and cracks develop on it which change the heat loss from the kiln. A test run without a
ring can help us negate this.
B.3 Image processing protocol
The flame visualization study gives us a lot of information about the variations in flame with
changes in conditions of operation inside the kiln. However, to capture this vast information
manually is almost impossible, due to the size of data. Thus, the use of an image processing
software.
The first step in image processing is data acquisition. Data is acquired in the form of video from
the video recorder. Each run is recorded for a time of one minute at a frame rate of 60 frames per
second. This results in 3600 frames. The flame is a dynamic object undergoing changes instantly,
and the video recorder captures 3600 of these instances in a minute. A statistical analysis of the
situation results in the conclusion that to have a confidence interval of 95%, with a confidence of
±5 mm, we require processing of 348 images from the 3600. Therefore, the first step in data
54
acquisition would be to extract 348 frames within a time interval of one minute, and can
represent the data contained in the video with a confidence of 95% and an accuracy of ± 5 mm
(since we are measuring the flame length in mm). A video player like KMPlayer (a free
software), has the ability to capture the frames, as and when they are played on screen. The
number of frames to be captured is set to 348 within a time limit of 1 minute and the images are
extracted and stored.
Next, the images have to be processed to obtain the data within them. ImageJ software (a free
and open source software, based on Java) is used for this purpose. The frames are first imported
into the environment of ImageJ. The software bases all its calculation on pixel units by default.
To convert this into an mm scale, a known distance on the image is first mapped to pixel units.
Parallax error reduction was achieved by using two different objects at two different positions.
Next, the imported images are processed in four steps to estimate the length of the flame (figure
38). Since all the images are from the same video, the brightness and color spectrum of every
frame would be identical. The frame is first cropped to show include only the flame in view.
Next, this image is converted to an 8-bit grayscale image. The image is then subject to
thresholding, where every pixel having more than a specified value of grey is highlighted. This
helps to demarcate the areas of the image that are to be processed by the software. The final step
is a particle identifying step, where the software analyses each particle highlighted in the
thresholding step. The software can calculate the Feret’s diameter of each of these particles.
Feret’s diameter estimates the distance between the ends of the image on a specified axis. Since
the flame would be the longest single particle in this group of particles, a simple two stage sort of
the result using MS Excel can give the length of the flame in each frame in millimeters.
Figure 38. Steps in image data processing using ImageJ
Image cropped and
converted to 8-bit
Image thresholded
Particles analyzed
55
Appendix C: Calculations
C.1 Calculation of total air requirement
The total air supplied to the burner was the sum of the stoichiometric air requirement and excess
air. It was calculated based on the methane-air combustion reaction.
𝐶𝐻4 + 2𝑂2 → 𝐶𝑂2 + 2𝐻2𝑂
This implies, 22.414L of methane would require 44.818L of oxygen to undergo complete
combustion.
Therefore, 1L of methane would require 2L of oxygen to undergo complete combustion.
Assuming air is 20.95% oxygen by volume, 1L of methane would require 9.55L of air to undergo
complete combustion.
Adding to this, an excess air of 10%, the total air required for 1L of methane would be 10.505L.
The following table gives a list air requirement for various fuel flow rates used in the study.
Table 1. List of methane flow rates and corresponding total air flow rates (with 10% excess air)
Fuel flow rate (LPM) Total air flow rate (LPM)
4 42.02
4.5 47.27
5 52.53
5.5 57.78
6 63.03
56
References
[1] Natural Resources Canada, [Online]. Available:
http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/industry/overview/13311. [Accessed 19 12 2016].
[2] Candian Industry Program for Energy Conservation, "Benchmarking Energy Use in
Candian Pulp and Paper Mills," 2008.
[3] H. Tran and E. K. Vakilainnen, "The Kraft Chemical Recovery Process," in TAPPI Short
Course, 2012.
[4] G. Hanson, "Lime Kiln Principles and Operation: Part I - Design and Operation," in TAPPI
Short Course, 2012.
[5] D. J. Kramm, W. L. Schulz and G. Hough, "Lime Reburning: The Rotary Lime Kiln," in
Chemical Recovery in the Alkaline Pulping Processes, TAPPI, 1985, pp. 269--297.
[6] H. Tran and D. Barham, "An overview of ring formation in lime kilns," TAPPI Journal, pp.
131-136, 1991.
[7] H. Tran, X. Mao and D. Barham, "Mechanism of Ring Formation in Lime Kilns," Journal
of Pulp and Paper Science, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 167-174, 1993.
[8] P. Mullinger and B. Jenkins, "Chapter 5 - Flames and burners for industrial processes," in
Industrial and Process Furnaces, Oxford, Butterworth - Heinemann, 2008, pp. 141-207.
[9] I. Glassman, R. A. Yetter and N. G. Glumac, Combustion, Elsevier, 2015.
[10] C. E. Baukal and B. Gebhart, "Heat-transfer from Oxygen enhanced/ natural gas flames
impinging normal to a plane surface," Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 16,
no. 3, pp. 247-259, 1998.
57
[11] R. Curtet, "Confined Jets and Recirculation Phenomena with Cold Air," Combustion and
Flame, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 384-411, 1958.
[12] L. Saeys, M. Zumer and J. Dealy, "Criteria for recirculation in confined jet flames,"
Combustion and Flame, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 367-377, 1971.
[13] P. Foster and et al., "Approximate similarity of confined turbulent coaxial jets," Journal of
Fluids Engineering, vol. 123, no. 3, p. 707, 2001.
[14] A. Benaissa and et al., "Recirculation of confined variable density turbulent jets,"
TRansactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 279,
2004.
[15] A. Aloqaily, A study of aerodynamics in rotary kilns with two burners, Toronto: University
of Toronto, 2008, p. 223.
[16] B. Jenkins and F. Moles, "Modelling of heat transfer from a large enclosed flame in a
rotary kiln," Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 17-
25, 1981.
[17] H. Abdelmonem, Fluid flow and combustion in rotary kilns, Vancouver: University of
British Colombia, 1998.
[18] T. Adams, "TAPPI Kraft Recovery Course," 2006.
[19] M. Ohbuko, Y. Nakagawa, T. Yamagata and N. Fujisawa, "Quantitative Visualization of
Temperature Field in Non-Luminous Flame by Flame Reaction Technique," Journal of
Visualization, vol. 2, no. 15, pp. 101-108, 2012.
[20] D. Wisman, B. Ganguly and S. D. Marcum, "High-Speed Visualization of a Flame
Reaction Zone Using a Positive Point-to-Plane Corona Discharge," IEEE Transactions on
Plasma Science, Vols. 4,1, no. 36, pp. 928-929, 2008.
58
[21] A. H. Abdolmonem, "Fluid flow and combustion in rotary kilns," University of British
Columbia, 1998.
[22] C. M. Muller, H. Breitbach and N. Peters, "Partially premixed turbulent propagation in jet
flames," Combustion/ The Combustion Institute, pp. 1099-1106, 1994.
[23] National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2016. [Online]. Available:
webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/name-ser.html. [Accessed 29 December 2016].
[24] J. D. Kramm, W. L. Schultz and G. W. Hough, "Lime Reburning," in Chemical Recovery
in the Alkaline Pulping Processes, 1992.