An Exact Implementation of the Hoek-Brown Criterion in FLAC (2D or 3D)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    An exact implementation of the Hoek-Brown criterion in

    FLAC (2D or 3D)

    Abstract

    This report presents a plastic stress update algorithm for the exact generalized Hoek-Brown criterion

    (modhb) including the apex and corner singularities. The model builds on the constitutive efforts of Johan

    Clausen and Lars Damkilde (2008). The plastic flow rule is taken to be non-associated with a plastic

    potential which are similar to the yield criterion. Perfect plasticity and isotropic linear elasticity are

    assumed. The stress update algorithm belongs to the class of algorithms termed return mapping, backward

    Euler or implicit integration.

    The Hoek-Brown criterion

    The material parameters for the rock mass are derived from two parameters relating to the intact rock

    material, coupled with two parameters which characterize the quality of the in-situ rock mass. The intact

    rock parameters are the uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock material, , and the petrographic constant, mi. The first in-situ parameter is the Geological Strength Index, GSI, which is a qualitative

    classification number for rock masses, see e.g. reference (Marinos et al., 2005). The second in-situ

    parameter is the disturbance factor, D, which ranges from 0 to 1 (Hoek et al., 2002). For undisturbed rock

    masses D = 0. Based on these parameters the failure criterion is written as (J. Clausen and L. Damkilde,

    2008):

    (1)

    where are the effective principal stresses. In Eq. (1) compression is taken as positive, which is often the case in rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Later on in this paper tension will be

    taken as positive and this is denoted by , , without a prime. The empirically determined parameters mb, s and a are given by

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

  • T

    D

    or

    T

    H

    F

    S

    In

    gi

    st

    st

    ap

    The rock m

    Diederichs,20

    r, if the intac

    0.Typical value

    Hoek-Brown

    Figure 1. (a)

    Stress upda

    n order to ob

    iven using a

    tandard meth

    tress is then

    pply, as can

    Return to th

    Return to th

    Return to th

    Return to th

    mass modulu

    006) .ct rock modu

    02 es of Poisso

    criterion in

    The Hoek-B

    ate for Ho

    btain unknow

    an increment

    hods. In prin

    n back trans

    be seen on F

    he yield surfa

    he curve l1

    he curve l2

    he apex

    us of elastic

    10 ulus, Ei, is kn ons ratio, full three-di

    (a)

    Brown criter

    (b

    oek-Brown

    wn stress in

    tal elastic str

    ncipal stress

    formed into

    Figure 1b,

    face

    city, Erm, c

    nown

    , for rock mmensional p

    ion in princi

    b) the four di

    n plasticity

    ncrement, the

    ress-strain la

    space the st

    xyz-space.

    2

    can be estim

    masses are g

    principal stre

    ipal stress sp

    ifferent stres

    y

    e predictor s

    aw. The princ

    tress is then

    For Hoek-B

    mated usin

    given in (E.

    ess space can

    pace. The hy

    ss returns.

    stress state i

    cipal predict

    returned to

    Brown plasti

    g the follo

    Hoek, E. T

    n be seen on

    (b)

    ydrostatic str

    in the gener

    tor stresses,

    the yield su

    icity four di

    owing (E. H

    T. Brown, 19

    Figure 1a.

    ress axis is d

    al stress spa

    , are thenurface and th

    ifferent stre

    Hoek, M.

    (5)

    (6)

    997). The

    denoted p.

    ace, , is n found by

    he updated

    ss returns

  • 3

    The first step is to determine whether the stress should be returned to the apex. If this is the case the

    updated stress is simply the apex stress. If the stress is not to be returned to the apex, a yield surface or the

    edges return is initiated. A detailed description of the constitutive model, its simulative potential is given

    in (Clausen, 2007).

    Model input parameters

    Model Parameters (modhb)

    Name Description young (or bulk) Young's modulus (or bulk modulus)

    poisson (or shear) Poisson's ratio (or shear modulus)

    comp Uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock

    m "friction" parameter of the rock mass

    s Hoek-Brown parameter

    a Curvature parameter in the Hoek-Brown criterion

    mg "dilation" parameter of the rock mass

    sg Hoek-Brown plastic potential parameter

    ag Curvature parameter in the Hoek-Brown plastic potential

    Included documents / files

    modelModHB2D32.dll a DLL file of the ModHB model compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 at 32bit for FLAC v6.0.

    modelModHB2D32.dll a DLL file of the ModHB model compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 at 32bit for FLAC v7.0.

    modelModHB3D32.dll a DLL file of the ModHB model compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 at 32bit for FLAC-3D v.4.00.32 32bit.

    modelModHB3D64.dll a DLL file of the ModHB model compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 at 64bit for FLAC-3D v.4.00.32 64bit.

    modelModHB3D32.dll a DLL file of the ModHB model compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 at 32bit for FLAC-3D v.5.00.86 32bit.

    modelModHB3D64.dll a DLL file of the ModHB model compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 at 32bit for FLAC-3D v.5.00.86 64bit.

    Example2D.dat example input file test for FLAC2D.

    Example3D32.dat example input file test for FLAC3D-32bit.

    Example3D64.dat example input file test for FLAC3D-64bit.

  • 4

    Contact address

    University of California, Berkeley Civil and Environmental Engineering, Geoengineering Department PhD. Candidate Roozbeh Geraili Mikola / Prof. Nicholas Sitar Davis Hall UC Berkeley Berkeley, California 94720-1710 Phone: (510) 643-8623 Fax: (510) 642-7476 e-mail: [email protected] / [email protected]

    AALBORG University Department of Civil Engineering, Division of Structural Mechanics Ass. Prof. Johan Clausen Sohngrdsholmsvej 57, 9000, Aalborg Denmark Phone: 9940 7234 Fax: 9940 8552 e-mail: [email protected]

    Acknowledgments

    This work was performed with funding from NSF-NEES-CR Grant No. CMMI-0936376: Seismic Earth

    Pressures on Retaining Structures through collaborative project Between University of California,

    Berkeley and Itasca Consulting Group Inc. Programs FLAC2D and FLAC3D were generously made

    available by Itasca Consulting Group Inc. under collaborative research agreements.

  • 5

    References

    J. Clausen, L. Damkilde, An exact implementation of the HoekBrown criterion for elasto-plastic finite element calculations in International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 45 (2008) , 831-847.

    J. Clausen, Efficient non-linear finite element implementation of elasto-plasticity for geotechnical problems. Ph.D. thesis, 2007, (http://vbn.aau.dk/files/14058639/JCthesis.pdf).

    E. Hoek, E. T. Brown, Practical estimates of rock mass strength, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 34 (8) (1997), 11651186.

    E. Hoek, M. S. Diederichs, Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 43 (2006), 203215.

    E. Hoek, C. Carranza-Torres, B. Corkum, Hoek-Brown failure criterion - 2002 edition, in: Proceedings of the North American Rock Mechanics Society Meeting in Toronto in July 2002, 2002.

    V. Marinos, P. Marinos, E. Hoek, The geological strength index: applications and limitations, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 64 (2005), 5565.