Upload
arab
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
second stopband can be kept constant when the first stopband
changes by tuning l3 and l6 (as shown in Figure 6), while the
first stopband is constant when the second stopband changes by
tuning l4 and l5 (as shown in Figure 7). Obviously, both stop-
bands can be controlled independently. The open-circuited stub
shunted in the middle of the filter can improve the impedance
matching in the passband. Figure 8 shows the simulated S11
with and without the open-circuited stub. It can be seen that the
return loss of the upper passband is greatly improved by adding
the open-circuited stub.
3. SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
According to the above analysis, the proposed dual-bandstop fil-
ter is designed, simulated, and optimized using electromagnetic
simulation tool IE3D. Note that the shorted stubs and the T-
shaped microstrip line are bended in the final fabrication for fur-
ther size reduction. The final dimensions of the dual-bandstop
filter are as follows: L ¼ 16.2 mm, L1 ¼ 3.6 mm, L2 ¼ 3.0 mm,
L3 ¼ 10.1 mm, L4 ¼ 6.4 mm, L5 ¼ 6.6 mm, L6 ¼ 10.5 mm,
L7 ¼ 3.9 mm, L8 ¼ 0.2 mm, W ¼ 0.8 mm, W1 ¼ 0.15 mm, W2
¼ 1 mm, W3 ¼ 0.2 mm, W4 ¼ 0.9 mm, s ¼ 0.1 mm, and d ¼0.2 mm. Using a print-circuit-board (PCB) technique, the filter
was fabricated on a microstrip substrate with a relative dielectric
constant of 3.5 and thickness of 0.508 mm. The fabricated dual-
bandstop filter is shown in Figure 7. Although a low dielectric
constant has been used, the filter is extremely compact with a
size of 11.2 mm � 8.05 mm. Figure 8 demonstrates the S-pa-
rameters of the dual-bandstop filter. It can be seen that the simu-
lated and measured results are in reasonable agreement with
each other. As can be observed from Figure 9, two stopbands
centered at 2.95 GHz and 4.05 GHz are realized. The first stop-
band has a measured maximum attenuation of 36 dB at 2.99
GHz, while the second stopband has a largest attenuation of 31
dB at 4.02 GHz. Furthermore, the insertion loss in the lower
passband from DC to 2.5 GHz is less than 0.5 dB, while the
insertion losses in the middle passband (from 3.25 GHz to 3.67
GHz) and upper passband (from 4.37 GHz to 6.67 GHz) are all
less than 1 dB.
Table 2 gives a comparison of some typical dual-bandstop
filters with the proposed design. Compared with the dual-band-
stop filter in [12], which has a similar performance with the pro-
posed work, the latter is only 13% of their overall size.
5. CONCLUSION
A novel compact dual-bandstop filter based on CRLH-TL is pre-
sented. The related circuit model has also been developed,
which can be used to design the desired dual-bandstop filter.
Each of the central frequencies of the stopbands can be con-
trolled independently. A compact dual-bandstop filter is
designed, fabricated, and tested. The simulated and measured
results are found in good agreement with each other.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work is supported by grants from the National Natural Science
Foundation of China-NASF (Grant No: 10976005), the Program
for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No:
NCET-11-0066), and the Research Fund of Shanghai Academy of
Spaceflight Technology.
REFERENCES
1. F.-C. Chen and Q.-X. Chu, Design of dual-band CT filter with
sourceload coupling, J Electromagn Waves Appl 25 (2011), 15–22.
2. K. Song and Y. Fan, Compact ultra-wideband bandpass filter using
dual-line coupling structure, IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon
Lett 19 (2009), 30–32.
3. K. Song and Q. Xue, Novel broadband bandpass filters using Y-
shaped dual-mode microstrip resonators, IEEE Microwave Wireless
Compon Lett 19 (2009), 548–550.
4. S.-C. Lin and C.-Y. Yeh, Stopband-extended balanced filters using
both k/4 and k/2 SIRS with common-mode suppression and
improved passband selectivity, Progr Electromagn Res 128 (2012),
215–228.
5. K. Song and Q. Xue, Inductance-loaded Y-shaped resonators and
their applications to filters, IEEE Trans Microwave Theor Tech 58
(2010), 978–984.
6. J.-Q. Huang, Q.-X. Chu, and C.-Y. Liu, Compact UWB filter based
on surface-coupled structure with dual notched bands, Progr Elec-
tromagn Res 106 (2010), 311–319.
7. K. Song and Q. Xue, Compact ultra-wideband (UWB) bandpass fil-
ters with multiple notched bands, IEEE Microwave Wireless Com-
pon Lett 20 (2010), 447–449.
8. S. Barbarino and F. Consoli, UWB circular slot antenna provided
with an inverted-L notch filter for the 5 GHz WLAN band, Progr
Electromagn Res 70 (2007), 297–306.
9. K. Chin, J. Yeh, and S. Chao, Compact dual-band bandstop filters
using stepped-impedance resonators, IEEE Microwave Wireless
Compon Lett 17 (2007), 849–854.
10. S. Han, X. Wang, and Y. Fan, Analysis and design of multiple-
band bandstop filters, Progr Electromagn Res 70 (2007), 297–306.
11. H.-K. Chiou and C.-F. Tai, Dual-band microstrip bandstop filter
using dual-mode loop resonator, Electron Lett 43 (2007), 507–509.
12. X.-Y. Zhang, X. Huang, H.-L. Zhang, and B.-J. Hu, Novel dual-
band bandstop filter with controllable stopband frequencies, Micro-
wave Opt Technol Lett 54 (2012), 1203–1206.
13. G. Monti, R. De Paolis, and L. Tarricone, Design of a 3-state
reconfigurable CRLH transmission line based on mems switches,
Progr Electromagn Res 95 (2009), 283–297.
14. J.L. Jimenez Martn, V. Gonzalez-Posadas, J.E. Gonzalez-Garca,
F.J. Arques-Orobon, L.E. Garcia-Munoz, and D. Segovia-Vargas,
Dual band high efficiency class CE power amplifier based on
CRLH diplexer, Progr Electromagn Res 97 (2009), 217–240.
15. X.Q. Lin, P. Su, Y. Fan, and Z.B. Zhu, Improved CRLH-TL with
arbitrary characteristic impedance and its application in hybrid ring
design, Progr Electromagn Res 124 (2012), 249–263.
16. T. Yang, P.L. Chi, and T. Itoh, Compact quarter-wave resonator
and its applications to miniaturized diplexer and triplexer, IEEE
Trans Microwave Theor Tech 59 (2011), 260–269.
17. C. Caloz and T. Ihoh, Electromagnectic metamaterials, transmis-
sion line theory and microwave applications, Wiley, New York,
2005.
18. D.M. Pozar, Microwave engineering, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York,
2003.
VC 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
AN ELECTRICALLY SMALL ANTENNAWITH INTEGRATED DGS FILTER
Sofiane Oukil,1 Hocine Kimouche,1 and Arab Azrar21Microwaves/Radar Laboratory, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, BP17 Bordj El-Bahri Algiers, Algeria2 Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University ofBoumerdes, Boumerdes, Algeria; Corresponding author:[email protected]
Received 24 August 2012
ABSTRACT: In this letter, a dumbbell-shaped defected groundstructure is proposed to suppress higher order harmonics of an
electrically small antenna. A slot loading technique is applied to a well-known low-profile antenna, and the area miniaturization of a
962 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 DOI 10.1002/mop
rectangular microstrip patch antenna by inserting a number of slitsparallel to the radiating edges is investigated in relation to the quality
factor. The antenna was designed to operate at 0.95 GHz (GSM).Measurement results on a prototype antenna fully demonstrate theperformance of the proposed antenna. VC 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:962–966, 2013; View this article online
at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.27498
Key words: DGS; small antenna; integrated DGS filter; electrically
small antenna
1. INTRODUCTION
Electrically small antennas, i.e., antennas that are small com-
pared to the free-space wavelength at their frequency of opera-
tion, have been a subject of research for many years [1, 2]. And
the challenges of these antennas are well known. They are uti-
lized in many applications, from mobile phones to GPS
receivers and wireless computer links. Moreover, the advance in
the electronic technology leads to an extensive decrease in the
overall size of the electronic parts needed for such mobile appli-
cations. Based on this fact, there is a demand in modern com-
munication systems for smaller antennas, with size significantly
less than the usual half wavelength.
In this letter, we present a microstrip small antenna inte-
grated with defected ground structure (DGS) jointly in ground
plane. The area miniaturization is achieved due to the presence
of the slits. The slits force the surface currents to meander, thus
artificially increasing the antenna’s electrical length without
modifying the patch’s global dimensions. A significant decrease
in the resonant frequency is observed, depending on the slit’s
length and width. The resultant antennas can be characterized as
small antennas in accordance to the relevant fundamental
limitations.
A new technique to reduce the higher order harmonics is
proposed using a dumbbell-shaped DGS etched in the ground
plane is presented and compared with a small antenna without
the DGS unit cell. It is well known that the DGS unit cell acts
as the stop-band filter at some frequency bands.
2. FUNDAMENTAL LIMITS AND COMPUTATION OF THEQUALITY FACTOR Q
The fundamental limitations of small antennas were first
addressed by Wheeler [1] and Chu [3]. It has been shown that
when an antenna becomes electrically small, its bandwidth
decreases. Chu derived an expression relating the antenna’s radi-
ation quality factor Q with the space the antenna fills, called
the radian sphere where the radius of this radian sphere is the
largest linear antenna dimension. Chu established a fundamental
Q limitation, which later reexamined by McLean [4], and is
given by:
Q ¼ 1
Kaþ 1
ðKaÞ3(1)
where K ¼ 2pk and k is the operating wavelength and ‘‘a’’ is the
radius of the radian sphere.
The above expression establishes a fundamental limit which
means that no antenna can ever exceed this threshold. If the
antenna presents losses, meaning the radiation efficiency is
lower than unity, then the quality factor is given as Q ¼ grQr.
The more efficiently an antenna occupies its radian sphere the
closer its Q would be to the Chu limit. An antenna is said to be
a miniature if the radius a <k/2p or alternatively if Ka < 1.
An approximate expression for the computation of the quality
factor of an antenna is presented by Yaghjian and Best in [5, 6],
and it is given by:
QzðxÞ ¼x
2RðxÞ
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi½R0ðxÞ�2 þ X0ðxÞ þ jXðxÞj
x
� �2s
(2)
where R(x) and X(x) are the resistance and reactance of the
antenna. This expression is used to calculate the quality factor
of the presented antenna configurations and it is compared with
the Chu limitation and the miniature antenna limit.
3. ANTENNA STRUCTURE AND DESIGN
The configuration of the proposed electrically small antenna is
illustrated in Figure 1. A low-cost Epoxy glass substrate with
relative permittivity of 4.32 and thickness of 1.6 mm is used. To
achieve a good match to a 50 X line, the width WL of microstrip
feed-line was set as 3.1 mm. The original patch that was used is
a rectangular microstrip patch antenna of resonant length L ¼36 mm and width W ¼ 44 mm. The slits are placed in parallel
with the radiating edges as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 The layout of the resultant small antenna. [Color figure
can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2 Input reflection coefficient for various values of Ls. [Color
figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 963
The slit width (Ws) was set equal to 1 mm. Simulation for
various lengths, Ls, as shown in Figure 2, shows that the reso-
nant frequency decreases with increasing the length Ls of the
antenna.
The quality factor Q for each one of the aforementioned slit-
ted configurations was calculated using Eq. (2) and is given in
Table 1. In Figure 3, the typical simulated Q curve for a specific
slit length shows that the minimal value for Q is at resonant
frequency.
The marker corresponds to the resonant frequency and the
relevant value of the quality factor Q. As can be seen for Ls >20 mm, all the demonstrated cases, the ratio of the antenna max-
imum dimension to the resonant wavelength is such that the
product Ka is below the Chu limit concerning the small antenna
definition (Ka < 1). Thus, the designed antennas can be labeled
as ‘‘small antennas’’.
4. SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Simulations are performed using commercially available pack-
age IE3D from Zeland. The measurement of the return
loss was performed using an Agilent 8719ES Vector Network
Analyzer. A photograph of the realized antenna is shown in
Figure 4.
The slit length (Ls) was set equal to 32 mm. The obtained
measured and simulated reflection coefficients are shown in Fig-
ure 5. According to this figure, it may be noticed that a good
agreement between simulated and measured resonant frequencies
is achieved, except the shift location of the resonant frequency.
This difference is probably caused by fabrication tolerances,
because of the uncertainty in the thickness and/or the dielectric
constant of substrate.
Obviously, the bandwidth achieved is sufficient for the Mo-
bile applications GSM (0.89–0.96 GHz). The currents on the
surface of the patch at 0.95 GHz are also presented in Figure 6.
It can be seen that the slits force the surface currents to mean-
der, thus artificially increasing the antenna’s electrical length
without modifying the patch’s global dimensions.
Figure 7 shows both the simulated and measured input reflec-
tion coefficient for the antenna without DGS for frequencies
from 0.8 GHz to 4.5 GHz. Clearly, the two figures are in good
agreement.
TABLE 1 Performance of the Slitted Configured Antenna
Ls (mm) F0 (GHz) Q QChu Ka
34 0.91 34.77 3.94 0.73
32 0.95 32.74 3.59 0.76
28 1.05 31.70 2.87 0.84
24 1.17 25.27 2.26 0.94
20 1.32 15.82 1.78 1.06
18 1.39 12.28 1.60 1.12
Figure 3 The simulated Q curve for the 32 mm slit length case.
[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4 Photograph of the realized antenna. [Color figure can be
viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 5 Measured and simulated return loss of the small antenna.
[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 6 Current distributions on the antenna surface at 0.95 GHz.
[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
964 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 DOI 10.1002/mop
5. SMALL ANTENNA WITH DGS FILTER INTEGRATED
The proposed stop-band harmonic suppression antenna configu-
ration is shown in Figure 8. The creation of a dumbbell-shaped
DGS [7] in the ground plane of the antenna is used for the sup-
pression of undesired frequencies. To study the effect of the
integrated filter on the antenna performances, the following sim-
ulations and measurements are performed.
It has been remarked that the reflection coefficient of the
DGS patch antenna depends on the dimension of the DGS unit
cell. An optimal values has been obtained by choosing a ¼ h ¼4 mm and d ¼ 16 mm. The fabricated antenna is depicted in the
photograph shown in Figure 9.
The simulated and measured input reflection coefficients of
the small patch antenna and small patch antenna with the DGS
unit cell are shown in Figures 10(a) and 10(b). The measured
results are in good accordance with the simulation ones.
It is clear from the results that the resonant frequency
(fundamental) of the proposed small antenna is 0.95 GHz.
The insertion of the filter leads to suppressing the higher
Figure 8 Small antennas with defect in the ground plane. [Color
figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 9 Photograph of the proposed antenna: (a) front side and (b)
back side. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is
available at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 7 Measured and simulated return loss of the small antenna for
0.8–4.5 GHz. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is
available at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 10 (a) Simulated return loss of the small antenna and small
antenna with the DGS. (b) Simulated and measured return loss of the
small antenna with the DGS. [Color figure can be viewed in the online
issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 965
order harmonics that correspond to 1.4 GHz, 1.7 GHz, 3.2
GHz, etc.
6. CONCLUSION
A basic rectangular microstrip patch antenna can be miniatur-
ized by inserting a number of slits parallel to the radiating
edges. A frequency reduction of up to 90% and an area reduc-
tion up to 55% can be observed, depending on the length of the
slit. For all the above cases, the resultant antennas can be char-
acterized as ‘‘small antennas’’ since the Chu and Wheeler limit
is satisfied.
A stop-band harmonic suppression microstrip small antenna
based on the dumbbell-shaped DGS has been presented. The
compact antenna with ultra-low harmonics is obtained by insert-
ing the filter, and it has potential application in the future in
next-generation mobile communication system.
REFERENCES
1. H.A. Wheeler, Fundamental limitations of small antennas, Proc
IRE 35 (1947), 1479–1484.
2. H.A. Wheeler, Small antennas, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 23
(1975), 462–469.
3. L.J. Chu, Physical limitations of omni-directional antennas, J Appl
Phys 19 (1948), 1163–1175.
4. J.S. McLean, A re-examination of the fundamental limits on the
radiation Q of electrically small antennas, IEEE Trans Antennas
Propag 44 (1996), 672–676.
5. A.D. Yaghjian and S.R. Best, Impendence, bandwidth, and Q
of antennas, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 53 (2005), 1298–
1324.
6. S.R. Best, The inverse relationship between quality factor and
bandwidth in multiple resonant antennas, IEEE Antennas Propag
Soc Int Symp (2006), 623–626.
7. D. Ahn and J.S. Park, A design of the low-pass filter using the
novel microstrip defected ground structure, IEEE Trans Microwave
Theory Tech 49 (2001), 86–93.
VC 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PLANAR MONOPOLE ANTENNA FORMULTIBAND WIRELESS APPLICATIONS
Seyed Ehsan Hosseini,1,2 Amir Reza Attari,1
and Mohammad Saeed Majedi1,21 Electrical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University ofMashhad, Mashhad, Iran2Communications and Computer Research Center, FerdowsiUniversity of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran; Corresponding author:[email protected]
Received 26 August 2012
ABSTRACT: In this article, a new multiband planar monopoleantenna for mobile devices application is presented. The proposed
antenna operation is on the basis of using two radiation spiral stripsand two slots on the ground plane. This antenna covers eight standard
frequency bands including: GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900, UMTS,WiBro, Bluetooth, WiMax, and WLAN. It occupies the area of 40 mm� 18 mm excluding the ground plane. A prototype of this antenna has
been fabricated and its parameters have been measured. There is agood agreement between the measured and simulated results. VC 2013
Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:966–970,
2013; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/
mop.27497
Key words: monopole antennas; multiband antennas; planar antennas
1. INTRODUCTION
With the progress of wireless communication systems which
operate in multi-frequency bands, there is a growing demand
for multiband antennas and microwave devices. For mobile
phones, planar antennas are very attractive, because these
antennas have low profile and also can be simply fabricated on
the system circuit board of the mobile phone for practical
applications.
In recent years, many planar antennas with multiband capa-
bility are suggested, including multiband planar inverted-F
antennas (PIFA) [1, 2] and planar monopole antennas [3–7]. The
proposed antenna in Ref. [3] covers four standard frequency
bands using a planar rectangular patch and a folded slit at the
patch’s bottom edge. In Ref. [4], a T-shaped planar monopole
antenna for covering five frequency bands is proposed. In Ref.
[5], a dual band monopole antenna is presented which is com-
posed of two inverted-L branches. A planar dual U-shaped
monopole antenna with multiband operation for the WiMax sys-
tem is proposed in Ref. [6]. Finally, a new monopole antenna
for penta-band WWAN operation in the mobile phone using
chip inductor is presented in Ref. [7].
In this article, a planar monopole antenna with two spiral
strips and two slots in the ground plane is proposed. Similar to
the presented antennas in Refs. [8] and [9] using slots in the
ground plane leads to the improvement of impedance matching.
The presented antenna can cover eight standard frequency
bands including the global system for mobile communication
(GSM900, 880–960 MHz), digital communication system
(DCS, 1710–1880 MHz), personal communication system
(PCS, 1850–1990 MHz), universal mobile telecommunication
system (UMTS, 1920–2170 MHz), wireless broadband (WiBro,
2300–2390 MHz), Bluetooth (2400–2484 MHz), worldwide
interoperability for microwave access (WiMax, 3400–3600
MHz), and wireless local area network (WLAN, 5150–5350
MHz, 5725–5825 MHz). In contrast to the planar inverted-F
antennas [1, 2], the proposed antenna has low profile. In addi-
tion, it covers more frequency bands in comparison with the
antennas in Refs. [3–7].
2. ANTENNA STRUCTURE
Figure 1 illustrates the geometry with detailed dimensions of
the proposed multiband planar monopole antenna which has
two spiral strips and two slots in the ground plane. A 1.6-mm
thick FR4 dielectric with size of 40 � 110 mm2, relative per-
mittivity of 4.4 and loss tangent of 0.0245 is used as the sub-
strate of the antenna. This structure is fed by a 50 X microstrip
line which is printed on the circuit board and connected
through a via-hole to a 50 X SMA connector on the back side
of the circuit board.
As it will be shown in the next section, two spiral strips
are the radiation elements which excite proper resonance
modes for achieving desired frequency bands. Using slots on
the ground plane also leads to improvement of the input
matching of the antenna in some considered frequency
bands.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The proposed antenna in the previous section was fabricated.
Figure 2 shows the photograph of a prototype. Figure 3 shows
the simulated and measured reflection coefficients versus the fre-
quency for this antenna. HFSS [10] has been used to analyze
and optimize the output characteristics of the antenna, and
E8364 network analyzer is used to measure the reflection
966 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 DOI 10.1002/mop