View
45
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Journal of Telecommunications, ISSN 2042-8839, Volume 16, Issue 1, September 2012 http://www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
Citation preview
JOURNAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VOLUME 16, ISSUE 1, SEPTEMBER 2012
© 2012 JOT
www.journaloftelecommunications.co.uk
12
An Educational Model Cellular Shape Convertor (EMCSC): A Tool That
Demonstrates and Calculates the Size and Shapes of Cells in Cellular Networks
Jameson Mbale
Abstract: This paper introduces the Educational Model Cellular Shape Convertor (EMCSC) a tool which demonstrates and
calculates the sizes and shapes of various models of cellular network cells. The size and shape of the cell is the most critical
factor in a cellular system design. The tool computes the area covered, distance around, ratio of boundary length and unit area,
ratio of unit area with N channels with cells, channel increased by a factor K and cell reduced by a factor M. The computed data
can be used to determine the ideal shape and use the information to guide the setting up and operation of the wireless cellular
network. The EMCSC tool has four major components: the Heterogeneous Shape Cell Model (HSCM), which holds the various
shape models; the Automated Equation Formula Calculator (AEFC), the automated part which evaluates the formulas; the
Mathematical Sorter (MS), which sorts the calculated data and User Repository (UR) which stores the data for later use by the
user.
Index Terms: Cells, mathematical formulas, increased factors and reduced factors.
—————————— ——————————
1 INTRODUCTION
ireless technology has emerged as one of the most convenient for establishing networks, especially in areas where it is difficult to install physical equip-
ment. Wireless equipment can easily be deployed in inac-cessible areas or terrain, such as base stations, Access Points (AP), backup power for access points, repeaters, laptops, solar panels, inventers and batteries.
The sizes and shapes of the cells are the most im-portant factors in designing a cellular network. It is with this in mind that the Educational Model Cellular Shape Convertor (EMCSC) tool has been developed to calculate the sizes of the various cell shapes. The computed data can be used to assess and determine the locations and sizes of the cells that comprise the network. The tool as-sists the telecommunications engineers to determine the areas to be covered, with minimum overlap of area cover-age within cells.
Various cell shapes are envisaged including polygons, squares, triangles, and circles. Appropriate models of cells would be designed before a cellular system is established. Cell boundaries need to be carefully considered because some shapes may leave larger areas uncovered. Similarly, a larger coverage that extended well outside the cell would be a waste of resources. Therefore, the need to adopt the cellular model shape which would cover ninety
percent of the site leaving only a small portion not cov-ered, which would be covered by the neighbouring cells. This implies that a particular cellular shape would be de-termined by the geographical terrain.
1.1 EMCSC Overview
The tool has a number of model shapes whose meas-urements are calculated taking radius R meters for circu-lar shapes and side R meters for equilateral triangles, squares and polygons. The EMCSC tool has an automated component which calculates the area covered, circumfer-ence, ratio of boundary length and unit area, ratio of unit area with N channels with cells, channel increased by a factor K and cell reduced by a factor M. The tool performs calculations on the various shape models. Based on the geography of the area, the engineer can assess from the computed figures the right shape model to use. Table 1 shows the various formulas used for each model within the EMCSC tool.
1.2 Study Outline
This study is organised as follows. Section 2 gives
highlights of other research that has focused on cellular
innfrastructure. The EMCSC system architecture is pre-
sented in Section 3. Section 4 discusses the implementa-
tion of the EMCSC and includes two illustrative case
studies. Section 5 draws some conclusions.
————————————————
J. Mbale is with the University of Namibia, Centre of Excelence in Tele-communications and Information Technology, Department of Computer Science, P/B, 13301, Windhoek, Namibia.
W
2 RELATED WORK
The desire to develop communication infrastructure in an
inaccessible areas is one of the factors that has driven the
emergence of cellular technologies. Recently much re-
search has focused on the development of cellular infra-
structure in inaccessible areas.
In [1] they illustrated that in a cellular system the most
important factor is the size and shape of the cell. They
define a cell as the radio area covered by a transmission
station or a base station. All users in the cell are served by
the base station. The authors point out that in ideal radio
environments, the shape of the cell will be circular cen-
tred at the microwave transmitting tower and with radius
equal to the reachable range of the transmitted signal. The
cell area and periphery are determined by the signal
strength within the region, which in turn depend on
many factors, such as the contour of the terrain, height of
the transmitting antenna, presence of hills, valleys, and
tall buildings and atmospheric conditions. The authors
emphasized that the actual shape of the cell would nor-
mally be irregular with a zigzag boundary. However, for
practical purposes, the cell could be approximated by a
regular hexagon, which is itself a good approximation of
a circular region. Using regular hexagonal shapes allows
a larger region to be divided into nonoverlapping hexag-
onal sub-regions of equal size, with each one representing
a cell area. The authors also gave some further examples,
including the square and the equilateral triangle, as alter-
native shapes that can be used to represent a cell area.
Octagons and decagons are shapes that better approxi-
mate a circular area. Figure 1 is taken from [1] and illus-
trates a cell with a base station and mobile stations (MS).
The Figure shows the circular, hexagonal and square cell
models.
Base Station
MS
CellMS
Ideal cell area
(2 - 10) km radius
Cell a
rea u
sed
in m
ost m
odelsA
ltern
ati
ve
sh
ap
e o
f a c
ell
Figure 1. Illustration of a Cell with a Base Station and Mobile Sta-tions
Although in [1], many cellular systems technologies
are discussed, less attention is given to the determination
of the size of cells. The EMCSC operates as a tool to com-
pute the cell size, the unit area when number of channels
is increased by a factor, and unit area when size of cell is
reduced by a factor. Such statistical data will aid tele-
communications and mobile engineers to determine
which cell model to use.
In [2], the cell is defined as the geographic area where
a mobile station is preferentially served by its base sta-
tion. It is pointed out that the cell shape can be defined as
a circle and its radius was determined so as to have a cir-
cular area within which base station and mobile stations
receive a signal power exceeding a given threshold. It is
emphasized that a mobile station moving out of its serv-
ing cell and into a neighbouring cell must be provided
with sufficient resources from these cells so that the al-
ready established communication will not be discontin-
ued. However, it is argued that circles, on the other hand,
cannot fill a plane without leaving gaps (holes) or exhibit-
ing overlapping areas. It was acknowledged that the use
of circular geometry may impose difficulties in the design
of a cellular network, whereas regular polygons, such as
equilateral triangles, squares, and regular hexagons
would not exhibit these constraints. The authors also clar-
ified that the choice for one or another cellular format
depends on the application, and noted that in practice,
the coverage area differs substantially from the idealized
geometric figures and that amoeboid cellular shapes are
more likely to occur.
The EMCSC presented in the present paper is an au-
tomated system which calculates the areas covered by the
cell shape and enables the engineer to make assessments
from the computed data.
In [3] the concept cells are defined as normally roughly
circular, but they are easier to model as hexagons. The
cells are all of the same size and grouped in units of seven
cells. At the centre of each cell is a base station to which
all the telephones in the cell transmit. It is further dis-
cussed that the base station consists of a computer and
transmitter/receiver connected to an antenna. At any in-
stant, each mobile telephone is logically in one specific
cell and under the control of that cell’s base station. When
a mobile telephone physically leaves a cell, its base station
notices the telephone’s signal fading away and asks all the
surrounding base stations how much power they are re-
ceiving from it. The base station then transfers ownership
to the cell getting the strongest signal, that is, the cell
where the telephone is then located. The telephone is then
informed of its new “boss”, and if a call is in progress, it
will be asked to switch to a new channel. It is emphasised
that base stations are really just radio relays.
In [4], it is pointed out that a synonym for “cell site” is
“cell tower”, although many cell site antennas are mount-
ed on buildings rather than on towers. However in GSM
networks, the technically correct term is a base transceiver
station (BTS), and colloquial British English synonym are
“mobile phone mast” or “base station”. It was also ex-
13
plained that a cell site was a term used primarily in North
America for a site where antennas and electronic commu-
nications equipment were placed to create a cell in a net-
work. It was further pointed out that each cell requires a
tower or other elevated structure for mounting antennas,
and one or more sets of transmitter/receivers, transceiv-
ers, digital signal processors, control electronics, a GPS
receiver for timing (for CDMA2000 or IS-95 systems),
regular and backup electrical power sources, and shelter-
ing.
The authors of [4] regard a cellular network as a radio
network made up of number of radio cells (or just cells)
each served by at least one fixed-location transceiver
known as a cell site or base station. These cells cover dif-
ferent land areas to provide radio coverage over a wider
area than the area of one cell, so that a variable number of
portable transceivers can be used in any one cell and
moved through more than one cell during transmission.
The authors point out that cellular networks offer a num-
ber of advantages over alternative solutions such as: in-
creased capacity, reduced power usage, larger coverage
area, and reduced interference from other signals.
3 EMCSC SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE
The EMCSC demonstrated in Figure 1 has four major
components: the Heterogeneous Shape Cell Model
(HSCM), Automated Equation Formula Calculator
(AEFC), Mathematical Sorter (MS) and User Repository
(UR). These are discussed in the following sections.
3.1 The Heterogeneous Shape Cell Model
The Heterogeneous Shape Cell Model is composed of
various cell shape models: the circle, the hexagon, the
square and the triangle. The size of a circle is specified as
the radius in kilometers, while the size of a hexagon,
square and triangle are specified as the length of a side in
kilometers. The user may choose one model at a time or
choose all to compute the cell size or sizes. The cell shape
information is forwarded to the EFC, where it is added to
other input data to commence the calculations.
Automated Equation Formula Calculator (AEFC)
User Respository
Distance
Length
Unit Area
.R R
RR R
. . Other
Shapes
Channel N,
Increased Factor K
Reduced Factor M
Mathematical
Sorter
Area
Covered
Distance
Around
Unit Area
/ Cells
Increased
Factor by
K
Reduced
Factor by
M
Heterogeneous Shape Cell Model
Figure 2. Educational Model Cellular Shape Convertor Systems architecture
3.2 The Automated Equation Formula Calculator (AEFC)
For The Automated Equation Formula Calculator (AEFC)
is an automated component of the tool that is pro-
grammed to evaluate the formulas shown in Table 1. The
AEFC receives the channel and factor data that is com-
bined with that from the Heterogeneous Cell Shape Mod-
el. This tool component calculates the area covered, cir-
cumference, distant length per unit area, channels per
unit area with N channels/cells, channels per unit area
when number of channels increased by a factor K and
channels per unit area when size of cell is reduced by a
factor M for all the cell shape models. The user may calcu-
late one shape model at a time or all at once. When the
14
calculations are complete, the computed data is forward- ed to the Mathematical Sorter.
TABLE 1. EDUCATIONAL MATHEMATICAL MODEL CELLULAR FORMULA USED IN EMCSC
Cell
Shape
(side = R)
Area-
Covered
Distant-
Around
Dist Length
/Unit Area
Unit Area/
Cells
Channels
by Fact. K
Reduced
Fact. M
Circular
Cell 2R R2
R
2 2R
N
2R
NK
2
2
R
NM
Hexagonal
Cell 2
2
33R 6R
R3
4
235.1 R
N
235.1 R
KN
2
2
35.1 R
NM
Square
Cell 2R 4R
R
4
2R
N
2R
KN
2
2
R
NM
Triangular
Cell 2
4
3R 3R
R
34
23
34
R
N
23
34
R
NK
2
2
3
34
R
NM
3.3 Mathematical Sorter (MS)
The Mathematical Sorter (MS) receives the computed data
from the AEFC, sorts the data according to its category
and forwards them to the User Repository.
3.4 Using Repository
The User Repository (UR) receives the sorted data from
the MS. In the UR, the sorted data is stored according to
its category as shown in Figure 2. This is where the user
can use the calculated data to assess which Cell Shape
model is suitable for the site.
4 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL MODEL
CELLULAR SHAPE CONVERTOR (EMCSC)
The tool is designed to calculate circular, hexagonal,
square and triangular cell shape models. The user may
choose either to calculate individual cell shape models or
all of them at once.
4.1 Case Study 1: Calcualte Hexagonal Cell Shape
In the tool, the user selects the hexagonal cell radio button
as illustrated in Figure 3a. The tool displays the hexago-
nal cell row with its six formulas under the respective
fields.
Figure 3a. Calculation of Hexagonal Cell Shape
Then the user enters the input data, for example: number of channels (N) = 3, channel increased by a factor
15
K = 2, the length side of a hexagon (R) = 10, reduced factor
M = 4. Once the input has been entered correctly, the user
presses the calculate button to have the tool compute the
output. The calculated values are displayed as shown in
Figure 3b as: area covered is = 259.80m2; distant around is
= 60.00m; distant length per unit area is = 0.23; unit area
with N channels per cells is = 0.011 m; unit area channels
increased by factor K is =0.023m; and unit area-size of cell
reduced by factor M is = 0.185m. The displayed results
may be cleared by pressing the clear button. To quit from
the whole system, an exit button may be used.
Figure 3b. Calculation of Hexagonal Cell Shape – Showing Results
For clarity, the Hexagonal cell row would have its val-
ue be presented column by column as follows:
Area-Covered = 2
2
33R
= 259.81m2 (1)
Distant-Around = 6R = 60m (2)
Dist. Length/Unit Area =R3
4
= 0.23m (3)
Unit-Area N Channels/Cells =235.1 R
N= 0.011m
(4)
Unit Area-Channels Increased by a Factor
K = 235.1 R
KN
= 0.023m (5)
Unit Area-Size of Cell Reduced by Factor
M = 2
2
35.1 R
NM
= 0.185m (6)
The other options: Circular, Square and Triangular
cells may be calculated as for the Hexagonal cell. Thereaf-
ter the computed values would be compared to assess the
cell model which would best suit the particular site.
4.2 Case Study 2: Calcualte for All the Cell Shapes
For In the tool there is also an option to calculate at once
for all the cell shapes Circular, Hexagonal, Square and
Triangular as shown in Figure 4. In this case the user
presses the Compare button, which will prompt for the
various inputs: number of channels (N) = 3, channel in-
creased by a factor K = 2, the length side of a hexagon (R)
= 10, reduced factor M = 4.
Figure 4a. Calculation of All Cell Shape
Once all the prompted input is completed, the results are displayed as indicated in Figure 4b.
Figure 4b. Calculation of All Cell Shape – Showing Results
From Figure 4b, the user can make comparisons. For
the same input data, the circular cell had the greatest area
covered and distant around, followed by Hexagonal cell,
third is Square cell and last is the Triangular cell.
The Circular cell covered more areas and distant
around. However, it is less successful when it comes to
distant length per unit area, channels per unit area per
cell and cell size reduced by factor M, for which attributes
the other model shapes do better, in order of hexagonal,
square and triangular.
With this mathematical comparison, the circular shape
and hexagonal shapes are preferred as the most appropri-
ate models. Though the circular shape tends to have more
space than the hexagonal, the latter has more added ad-
17
vantages. Though the shapes with higher area and distant
around, they have the least cell size reduced by factor M,
channels per unit area per cell and distant length per unit
area. One of the greatest disadvantages of the circular
shape is when there are multiple cells to be covered, as
circles leave larger gaps between the boundaries as indi-
cated in Figure 5a. By contrast, the hexagonal in Figure 5b
leaves no gaps at all. For this reason, the hexagonal shape
is more preferred than the circular one in the design of
cellular wireless networks.
Gaps
between
circular cells
No gaps
between
hexagonal
cells
Figure 5a. Circular Cells Figure 5b. Hexagonal Cells
5 CONCLUSION
The size and shape of a cell is the most important factor in
a cellular network. In fact the cell area and the distant
around are the most critical parameters that affect the
handoff from a cell to an adjacent cell. Therefore, this pa-
per introduces the EMCSC tool that calculates the size
and shape of the various cell models. The study has en-
visaged that the size and capacity of the cell per unit area
and the impact of the shape of a cell on service character-
istics is the cornerstone to develop a cellular system. It is
obvious from the calculations that when the cell area is
increased, the number of channels per unit area is re-
duced for the same number of channels. Therefore it is
ideal for less populated areas with fewer cell phone sub-
scribers. Note that if the number of cell phone users is
increased, then the obviously the number of channels
may be increased. The other alternative is to reduce the
cell size so that the number of channels per unit area is
kept comparable to the density of subscribers.
The calculations done also showed that the hexagonal
model shape was the most ideal for the cellular system.
Apart from the calculated data, Figure 4b demonstrated
that the hexagonal shape could fit tightly just likes tiles on
the floor.
REFERENCES
[1] D. P. Agrawal and Q. Zeng, “Introduction to Wireless
and mobile Systems,” Thomson, Canada, 2006.
[2] M. D. Yacoub, “Wireless Technology, Protocols,
Standards, and Techniques,” CRC Press LLC, United
State of America, 2002.
[3] A. S. Tanenbaum, “Computer Networks,” Fourth
Edition. Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey, United State
of America: 2003.
[4] Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Jameson Mbale received his PhD Degree in Computer Science
from Harbin Institute of Technology, China, in 2003. He obtained
M.Sc. Degree in Computer Science from Shanghai University in
1996 and B.A. in Mathematics and Computer Science at University
of Zambia in 1993 in Zambia. He is a Senior Lecturer in the Depart-
ment of Computer Science at the University of Namibia. He is the
founder and coordinator of Centre of Excellence in
Telecommunications and Information Technology. His research
interest in network security, wireless networking, telecommunications
and e-Learning and he has published papers in these areas.
18