Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4/26/09
2009 NASC
An “Outside Look” at Snow and Ice Control in Omaha
Presented byScott McIntyre, P.E., Street Maintenance Engineer – City of
Omahaand,
Larry Frevert, P.E., Vice President - HDR
Omaha, NE
• Population = 410,000 (432,921 in 2008 – Wikipedia)• Approximate Land Area in City Limits = 126 Sq. Mi.• Average Winter Snowfall = 30”• Typical Snow Storm Accumulation ~ 2”• Average Snow and Ice Control Expenditure per Year (2005-2008) ~ $4.35M• Strong Mayor form of Government with a City Council of 7 District Councilpersons• Lane Miles of Street
– Primary Arterials = 668– Secondary Arterials = 787– Collectors = 339– Residentials = 2,765– Total = 4,559
More Omaha “Stuff”• 42nd largest city in the US• Metropolitan area includes Council Bluffs, IA and total metro population ~
838,000 (60th largest metropolitan area in US)• 1090 feet above sea level”• Home to five Fortune 500 Companies
– ConAgra Foods– Union Pacific Corporation– Peter Kiewit and Sons, Inc– Mutual of Omaha Companies– Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffett, richest person in the world –
Forbes Magazine 2008)• 8th in America’s largest cities in both per capita billionaires and Fortune 500
Companies• Home to the NCAA College World Series• Henry Doorly Zoo• A Top 10 Tech Haven (Newsweek 2001)• Stockyards and Omaha Beef• HDR World Headquarters
4/26/09
2009 NASC
March 1, 2007 Blizzard
• Official snowfall depth was 7” to 9”.
• Drifts of 24” reported.
• Winds gusts of 40 mph.
• Temperatures in the teens and 20’s throughout the first four days.
March 1, 2007 Blizzard
• Snowfall began Thursday morning (3/1).
• Light snow and heavy to moderate winds continued to Saturday evening (3/3).
• Drifting was a problem.
• Plowing was completed on Wednesday (3/7).
• Crews immediately went into a citywide pothole operation on Thursday (3/8).
Resources used during blizzard
• Every available Public Works and Parks Department operator and truck was engaged (120 plows).
• Approximately 25 contracted plows.
• Public Works received over 5,000 phone calls from public
• Public Works provided dozens of interviews to media.
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Why a study?
• Severe weather events focus attention on city services.
• Public interest in emergency response is heightened.
• Elected officials examine policies and re-consider funding.
Desired study outcomes
• Analyze new technologies
• Identify industry standards
• Identify constraints
• Build public confidence
• Provide basis for future investments and changes
Study Intent
1. Perform a “peer city” evaluation of mid-western cities of similar size and climate to Omaha’s thus evaluating relative resources and program capabilities
2. Assess the city’s existing program and readiness for snow and ice events
3. Conduct citizen interviews to determine taxpayer “satisfaction” with Omaha’s current snow and ice control program
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Peer City Review
• Peer Cities Contacted– Des Moines, IA *– Ft. Wayne, IN– Kansas City, MO *– Lincoln, NE *– Minneapolis, MN *– Peoria, IL * (snow and ice control expenditures “buried” in budget)– St. Louis, MO– St. Paul, MN * (provided centerline miles and not lane miles)– Sioux Falls, SD*– Toledo, OH– Wichita, KS * (does not service residential streets)
* Provided Peer City Data
Peer City Surveys (Page-1)
Peer City Surveys (Page-2)
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Peer City Surveys (Page-3)
Peer City Surveys (Page-4)
Peer City Findings
Average Snow and Ice Costs per Capita and Per 1" of Snow per Lane Mile
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
Omaha City 1 City 2 City 3 City 4 City 5 City 6 City 7 City 8
$ p
er
Cap
ita a
nd
per
1"
of
Sn
ow
per
Lan
e M
ile
Ave. Expenditure/Capita
Average Cost/1" of Snow /Lane-Mile
Ave. = $15.09 per Capita
Ave. = $43.34 per 1” of Snow per Lane Mile
$1
0.3
0
$3
0.8
6
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Peer City Findings
Average Snow and Ice Costs Per Lane Mile and Per 1" of Snow per Square Mile of City
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
Omaha, NE City 1 City 2 City 3 City 4 City 5 City 6 City 7 City 8
$ p
er
Lan
e M
ile a
nd
per
1"
of
Sn
ow
per
Sq
uare
Mile o
f C
ity
Average Cost/Lane Mile
Average Cost/1” of Snow /Square Mile of City
Ave. = $1,718 per Lane Mile
Ave. = $1,219 per 1” of Snow per Square Mile of City
$9
26
$1
,11
7
Peer City Findings
Lane Miles per Operator and per Piece of Equipment
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Omaha City 1 City 2 City 3 City 4 City 5 City 6 City 7 City 8
Lan
e M
iles p
er
Un
it
Lane Miles/Operator
Lane Miles/Snow Plow
Lane Miles/Spreader
Ave. = 17 Lane Miles per Operator
Ave. = 22.9 Lane Miles per Snow Plow
Ave. = 38.0 Lane Miles per Spreader
23
.7
36
.8
52
.4
Consultant’s Opinion
• Omaha’s expenditures for snow and ice control annually are:
– 31% less per capita than its peer cities
– 46% less per lane mile than its peer cities
– 29% less per 1” of snow per lane mile than its peer cities
And,
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Consultant’s Opinion
• Omaha’s snow and ice control resources are expected to cover:
– 39% more lane miles per operator than its peer cities
– 61% more lane miles per snow plow than its peer cities
– 38% more lane miles per spreader than its peer cities
Review of Omaha’s Practices
• Received and reviewed numerous documents provided by the city
– Snow Plan Manual
– Organizational Chart
– Route Maps
– Narrative description of the snow and ice program
– Public information pamphlet (dated December 2005)
– Ordinances related to snow emergency routes and parking enforcement on those routes
And,
Review of Omaha’s Practices
• Interviewed and visited with the street maintenance engineer on numerous occasions
• Accompanied the street maintenance engineer on a “night run” during a January 2008 snow event
• Met with the street maintenance engineer’s supervisor (city engineer) and several of the division’s field supervisors, including the superintendent and two district foremen.
• A total of 14 City Staff Members were interviewed (including leaders of organized labor union)
4/26/09
2009 NASC
City Staff Interview Form
Client Practices Reviewed
• Program Goals and Objectives
• Public Information
• Organizational Structure
• Resources
• Chemical Usage
• Future Technologies
• Provide for Future Technology Exchanges with Peer Cities
• Ordinances Related to Adjacent Property Owner’s Responsibility to Clean Adjacent Sidewalks of Snow and Ice and Emergency No Parking Restrictions
Program Goals and Objectives
• The Snow and Ice Control Manual states:
– “On major streets, the Street Maintenance Division’s goal is to clear these streets of ice and snow to bare pavement a soon as possible.”
• Also,
– “Snow and ice control efforts are geared to provide access to the residential and business areas.” And,
– “Residential areas will be completed in as timely a manner as conditions allow.”
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Consultant’s Opinion
The City of Omaha’s goal for clearing residential streets is too vague
Public Information• City takes a reactive approach to public
information – wait for the media to contact the city once a storm is forecast or occurs
• No pre-season mailings to citizens
• Favorable feedback on city’s e-mail (previously Fax) notifications to businesses of impending conditions
Consultant’s Opinions
The City of Omaha needs to be more proactive in their approach to public information about their snow and ice control program
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Organizational Structure
• Street Maintenance Division is a “Flat Organization”
– Street Maintenance Engineer
– Street Maintenance Superintendent
– District Foremen
• Focused on quantity and quality of service within their district boundaries
Consultant’s Opinions
The City of Omaha could benefit from increased administrative management/support and greater delegation of authority/ responsibility to field supervisors
Resources
124 Plowing Units and 87 Spreading Units
• Personnel– 122 Street Maintenance Division Operators and 50 “borrowed” personnel
= 86 per 12 hour shift
• Trucks:– 75 of 35,000 GVW or Greater, including 7 tandem axle trucks (w/ snow
plows, 64 with spreaders)
– 28 of less than 35,000 GVW (all w/ snow plows, 23 with spreaders)
– Pick-up trucks = 17 (all w/ snow plows, no spreaders)
• Motor graders = 4
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Consultant Opinions
The City of Omaha is not investing adequately in the numbers of snow and ice control personnel and equipment and alternative equipment types could enhance productivity
Chemical Usage
• Salt
• Salt/Sand Mixtures
• Some use of liquid chemicals for “pre-wetting” salt and salt/sand mixtures
• No anti-icing
Consultant Opinions
The City of Omaha relies too heavily on sand and other abrasives and could enhance their program by incorporating liquid anti-icing practices
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Future Technologies
• Omaha is pretty progressive
– GIS mapping of snow routes
– Beginning to incorporate AVL in plowing/spreading units
– Use of Internet reporting technology for updating managers on route status
Omaha Public Works Department
Communication during a snow event
AVL System
4/26/09
2009 NASC
AVL Mapped Reports
AVL Tabular Reports
Google Docs (web based operation
report)
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Operation Log
Snow Ops (Web based GIS operation report)
Codespear
• Emergency call is made to any number of personnel on any number of devices.
• Call is initiated from a PC.
• Message is preset or custom.
• Records when call is acknowledged.
• Goes out to phones, pagers, emails, text messages, ….
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Codespear message
Notification Group
Consultant’s Opinions
The City of Omaha is applying advanced technologies in its snow and ice control program management and should continue this effort
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Provide for Technology Exchange with Peer Cities
• Omaha participates in NE Chapter APWA
• Occasional dialogue with Lincoln, NE
• Visited Kansas City, MO several years ago
Consultant’s Opinions
The City of Omaha could benefit from greater technological exchanges between its staff and other snow and ice control professionals
Ordinances Related to Adjacent Property Owner’s Responsibility to Clean Adjacent Sidewalks of Snow and Ice and Emergency No Parking
Restrictions
• Citizens don’t believe city addresses sidewalk clearing– City doesn’t advertise program but it is reactive to
citizen complaints
• City does not enact Emergency No Parking Restrictions on Snow Routes or doesn’t enforce them
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Consultant’s Opinions
The City of Omaha doesn’t adequately publicize its sidewalk clearing policy/program and ordinances that aren’t enforced are worse than useless
Citizen Interviews
• Interviewed 9 citizens (neighborhood association leaders) recommended by members of the City Council
• Met with 13 business people recommended by Chamber of Commerce and city staff, including City Council’s administrative staff
Citizen Interview Form
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Top 5 Citizen Interview Comments
1. General satisfaction with major streets’ snow and ice control and general dissatisfaction with minor and residential streets
2. Generally ineffective pre-season public information efforts by the city, adequate to good during a storm
3. The city could make better utilization of equipment and technologies
4. Increased resources, personnel and equipment, are identified as the greatest needs to an improved snow and ice control program
5. The public is generally negative towards a tax increase or higher fees for city services but many felt if significant snow and icecontrol program improvements can be attained, they would be supportive
Recommendations
1. Develop a more comprehensive public information campaign regarding Omaha’s Snow and Ice Control Program, utilizing:
a. Pro-active media contactsb. Providing citizens with information packetsc. Utilizing Public Service Announcements (PSA) opportunities
through local cable TV providersd. Upgrading snow and ice control materials on the City’s websitee. Continue e-mail notifications to Omaha businesses on weather,
street conditions and city’s plan for early dismissal of employees due to driving conditions
f. Explain to the public their responsibility to ensure that sidewalks are cleared of snow and ice in a timely fashion and the city’s program to clear those, on a complaint basis, that aren't’ cleared by the property owner
g. Make these recommendations and the reports available to the citizens of Omaha
Recommendations
2. Update the Snow Program Manual
a. Identify program goals by street classification
b. Document salt or salt additive and abrasive applications rates by storm type
c. Incorporate information contained in separately provided “narrative description”into official program manual
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Recommendations
3. Determine desirability of retaining the current municipal ordinance regarding “Emergency No Parking”
• If desirable, enforce or if not desirable, eliminate it
Recommendations
4. Make resource related changes to the City’s Snow and Ice Control Program
a. Number of personnel (authorized and filling vacancies)
b. Authorize an Assistant to the Street Maintenance Engineer
c. Delegate more authority to field level supervisors
d. Training of personnel
e. Evaluate purchase of wing plows
f. Emphasize salt or salt alternatives usage and minimize sand and other abrasives usage
g. Incorporate anti-icing into program
h. Evaluate opportunities to re-assign existing pick-up trucks and purchase more in the future – residential street plowing/salting
Recommendations
5. Invest in capability to improve snow and ice control program by increasing equipment replacement funding and continuing to specify equipment best suited to the snow and ice control needs of the city
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Recommendations
6. Invest in more modern technology
a. Anti-icing
b. Fixed spray applicators
c. “Plow vision” tracking
Changes in Omaha’s snow plan began in 2008 / 2009 snow
season
Organized web site
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Better content
Brine Truck
Warning sign & light bar
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Fill connection
Control valves
Brine Storage
4/26/09
2009 NASC
Questions?