9
 An analytic example examining the reference velocity sensitivity of the elastic internal multiple attenuation algorithm S.-Y. Hsu, S. Jiang and A. B. Weglein, M-OSRP, University of Houston Abstract Internal multi ple attenuation is a pre-processing step for seismic imaging and amplitude analysis. Hsu and Weglein (2007) showed that the internal multiple algorithm from the inverse scattering serie s is independent of referen ce velocity for an 1D earth with acoustic background. In this study, we followed the analysis of Nita and Weglein (2005) and used the elastic internal multiple algorithm (Matson, 1997) to investigate velocity sensitivity for an 1D earth with elastic reference medium. The result suggests that the algorithm is also independent of reference velocity for an 1D earth with elastic background. 1  Introduction Seismi c processing is used to estimat e subsurfac e properties from the reec ted wav e-el ds. The seismic data are a set of reec ted wav es including primar ies and multiples. Prima ries are event s tha t ha ve only one up wa rd reection befo re arr ivi ng at the recei ver. Mul tiply reect ed ev en ts (multiples) are classied as free-surface or internal multiples depending on the location of their down ward reect ions. F ree-s urfac e mul tiples hav e at least one downward ree ction at the air- water or air-land surface (free surface). Internal multiples have all downward reections below the measurement surface (Weglein et al., 1997; Weglein and Matson, 1998). Methods for seismic imaging and amplitude analysis usually assume that the reection data are primaries-only. T o accommodate this assumption, multiple remo v al/atte nuation is a prere quisit e for seismic processing. Conventional methods successfully attenuate multiples by assuming simple or kno wn subsurface geology. However, in geolog ically complex areas those methods may become inadequate (Otnes et al., 2004). To overcome the limitations of conventional methods, the inverse scattering series (ISS) methods were proposed to perform multiple removal/suppression for acoustic data without subsurface information or assumptions (Carvalho, 1992; Ara´ ujo, 1994; Weglein et al., 1997). Following this framework, Matson (1997) extended the multiple attenuation algorithm from acoustic to elastic. In order to keep the perturbation below the measurement surface, the ISS multiple removal/attenuation methods usually require a known source wavelet and information about the near surface (Matson, 1997). To obtain the source wavelet, Wang and Weglein (2008) has shown how Green’s theorem is used to fulll the requirement. The need of the near surface properties is a practical obstacle for on- shore/ocean bottom application. Here, we present an analytic example to show the inner working s of the elastic internal multiple algorithm. In particular, we demonstrate how this scattering-based algorithm can predict exact arrival times without the above assumption being true. 32

An analytic example examining the reference velocity sensitivity of the elastic internal multiple attenuation algorithm S.-Y. Hsu, S. Jiang and A. B. Weglein, M-OSRP, University of

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

An analytic example examining the reference velocity sensitivityof the elastic internal multiple attenuation algorithmS.-Y. Hsu, S. Jiang and A. B. Weglein, M-OSRP, University of Houston

Citation preview

  • An analytic example examining the reference velocity sensitivityof the elastic internal multiple attenuation algorithm

    S.-Y. Hsu, S. Jiang and A. B. Weglein, M-OSRP, University of Houston

    Abstract

    Internal multiple attenuation is a pre-processing step for seismic imaging and amplitude analysis.Hsu and Weglein (2007) showed that the internal multiple algorithm from the inverse scatteringseries is independent of reference velocity for an 1D earth with acoustic background. In thisstudy, we followed the analysis of Nita and Weglein (2005) and used the elastic internal multiplealgorithm (Matson, 1997) to investigate velocity sensitivity for an 1D earth with elastic referencemedium. The result suggests that the algorithm is also independent of reference velocity for an1D earth with elastic background.

    1 Introduction

    Seismic processing is used to estimate subsurface properties from the reflected wave-fields. Theseismic data are a set of reflected waves including primaries and multiples. Primaries are eventsthat have only one upward reflection before arriving at the receiver. Multiply reflected events(multiples) are classified as free-surface or internal multiples depending on the location of theirdownward reflections. Free-surface multiples have at least one downward reflection at the air-water or air-land surface (free surface). Internal multiples have all downward reflections below themeasurement surface (Weglein et al., 1997; Weglein and Matson, 1998).

    Methods for seismic imaging and amplitude analysis usually assume that the reflection data areprimaries-only. To accommodate this assumption, multiple removal/attenuation is a prerequisitefor seismic processing. Conventional methods successfully attenuate multiples by assuming simpleor known subsurface geology. However, in geologically complex areas those methods may becomeinadequate (Otnes et al., 2004). To overcome the limitations of conventional methods, the inversescattering series (ISS) methods were proposed to perform multiple removal/suppression for acousticdata without subsurface information or assumptions (Carvalho, 1992; Araujo, 1994; Weglein et al.,1997). Following this framework, Matson (1997) extended the multiple attenuation algorithm fromacoustic to elastic.

    In order to keep the perturbation below the measurement surface, the ISS multiple removal/attenuationmethods usually require a known source wavelet and information about the near surface (Matson,1997). To obtain the source wavelet, Wang and Weglein (2008) has shown how Greens theorem isused to fulfill the requirement. The need of the near surface properties is a practical obstacle for on-shore/ocean bottom application. Here, we present an analytic example to show the inner workingsof the elastic internal multiple algorithm. In particular, we demonstrate how this scattering-basedalgorithm can predict exact arrival times without the above assumption being true.

    32

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    2 Theory

    We start with the forward scattering series derived from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation

    G = G0 +G0V G, (1)

    which can be expanded in a forward series

    G = G0 +G0V G0 +G0V G0V G0 + , (2)

    where G and G0 are the actual and reference Greens functions. The perturbation V can be writtenas V =

    n Vn where Vn is n-th order in the data.

    Define D = GG0 as the measurement of the scattered field. Substituting into the forward seriesgives the inverse scattering series in terms of data

    D = G0V1G0,0 = G0V2G0 +G0V1G0V1G0,0 = G0V3G0 +G0V2G0V1G0 +G0V1G0V2G0 +G0V1G0V1G0V1G0,....

    (3)

    The term G0V1G0V1G0V1G0 is the first term in the inverse series of first order internal multiples.

    Following the method developed by Weglein et al. (1997) and Araujo (1994), the equation for firstorder internal multiples in 2-D acoustic data is

    b3IM (kg, ks, qg + qs) =1

    (2pi)2

    dk1eiq1(zgzs)

    dk2eiq2(zgzs)

    dz1b1(kg, k1, z1)e

    i(qg+q1)z1

    z1

    dz2b1(k1, k2, z2)e

    i(q1+q2)z2

    z2+

    dz3b1(k2, ks, z3)e

    i(q2+qs)z3

    (4)

    The parameter > 0 ensures z1 > z2 and z3 > z2 which satisfy the geometric relationship betweenreflections of internal multiples (lower-higher-lower). b1 is defined in terms of the original pre-stackdata without free surface multiples. The data can be written as

    D(kg, ks, ) = (2iqs)1b1(kg, ks, qg + qs), (5)

    where b1(kg, ks, qg + qs) represents the data result from a single-frequency incident plane wave.

    33

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    The adapted elastic version of (4) given by Matson (1997) is

    B3IMij (kg, ks, qig + q

    js) =

    1(2pi)2

    dk3eiql1(zgzs)

    dk2eiqm2 (zgzs)

    dz1Bil(kg, k1, z1)e

    i(qig+ql1)z

    1

    z1

    dz2Blm(k1, k2, z2)e

    i(ql1+qm2 )z2

    z2+

    dz3Bmj(k2, ks, z3)e

    i(qm2 +qjs)z

    3

    (6)

    where qi1 indicate P and S vertical wavenumbers for i = P and S, respectively.

    Similarly, Bij is defined in terms of the original pre-stack data, that is

    Dij(k1, k2, ) = (2iqj2)1Bij(kg, ks, qi1 + qj2). (7)

    Hence,

    DPP (k1, k2, ) =(2iqP2 )1BPP (kg, ks, qP1 + qP2 ),DPS(k1, k2, ) =(2iqS2 )1BPS(kg, ks, qP1 + qS2 ),DSP (k1, k2, ) =(2iqP2 )1BSP (kg, ks, qS1 + qP2 ),DSS(k1, k2, ) =(2iqS2 )1BSS(kg, ks, qS1 + qS2 ).

    (8)

    One can see that if the converted waves do not exist, equation (6) becomes equation (4), which isthe first order internal multiple attenuator in acoustic form.

    3 Attenuation of elastic internal multiples : a 1.5D example

    We consider a layering model given by Nita and Weglein (2005) (see Figure 1). The velocity changesacross the interfaces located at z = za and z = zb where the velocities are c0, c1, and c2, respectively.The sources and receivers are located at the measurement surface where the depth z = 0. Thereference vertical speeds are defined as

    civ ={0/cosi, if i = P0/cosi, if i = S

    (9)

    The reference horizontal speed is defined as

    cih ={0/sini, if i = P0/sini, if i = S

    (10)

    where 0 and 0 are P -wave and S-wave velocity in the reference medium, respectively.

    34

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    Figure 1: The model for the 1.5D example

    Figure 2: The geometry of the first primary in the data

    The horizontal wave numbers are

    kis = /cih,

    kjg = /cjh.

    (11)

    For media with depth-dependent velocity, the horizontal slowness (sini/c(z) p) is constant along

    35

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    a ray path whether or not converted waves are present (Aki and Richards, 2002). Therefore,

    kis = kjg = /ch,

    kis + kjg = 2/ch.

    (12)

    The vertical wave numbers are

    qis =

    ( 0 )

    2 k2s , if i = P( 0 )

    2 k2s , ifi = S(13)

    qjg =

    ( 0 )

    2 k2g , if j = P( 0 )

    2 k2g , ifj = S(14)

    The total travel time for the n-th primary can be written as

    Tn = n + th, (15)

    where n and th are the vertical and horizontal travel times, respectively. The horizontal traveltime is defined as

    th =xg xsch

    =2xhch

    , (16)

    and the vertical travel time corresponding to the n-th event is

    n =znciv

    +zn

    cjv, (17)

    where zn is the pseudo depths for the n-th event. Therefore,

    n = zn(

    civ+

    cjv)

    = zn(qis + qjg) = znk

    ijz ,

    th = (2xhch

    ) = khxh.

    (18)

    The data in the frequency domain can be written as

    Dij(xh, 0;) =12pi

    dkhn

    Rijn eikijz zn

    2iqiseikhxh . (19)

    where kijz = qis + qjg, kh = kg + ks ,and xh = (xg xs)/2.

    Fourier transform over xg, xs,

    Dij(kh, 0, ) =2pi2iqis

    n

    Rijn eiznk

    ijz (kg ks). (20)

    36

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    The data is

    Bij(kh, 0, ) = 2iqisDij(kh, 0, )

    = 2pin

    Rijn eikijz zn(kg ks). (21)

    Inverse Fourier transforming into the pseudo depth domain gives

    Bij(kh, z, ) = 2pin

    Rijn (z zn)(kg ks). (22)

    Substituting equation (22) into equation (6), the integration over z3 gives z2+

    dz3eikmjz z3Bmj(k2, k

    s, z

    3) =2pi

    z2+

    dz3eikmjz z3

    p

    Rmjp (z3 zp)(k2 ks)

    =2pip

    Rmjp eikmjz zpH(zp (z2 + ))(k2 ks)

    The integration over z2 is z1

    dz2eiklmz z2Blm(k1, k

    2, z

    2) 2pi

    p

    Rmjp eikmjz zpH(zp (z2 + ))(k2 ks)

    = (2pi)2 z1

    dz2eiklmz z2

    q

    Rlmq (z2 zq)(k1 k2)

    p

    Rmjp eikmjz zpH(zp (z2 + ))(k2 ks)

    = (2pi)2p,q

    Rmjp Rlmq e

    ikmjz zpeiklmz z

    qH(zp (zq + ))H((z1 ) zq)(k2 ks)(k1 k2)

    The integration over z1 is

    dz1eikjlz z1Bjl(kg, k

    1, z

    1)

    [(2pi)2p,q

    Rmjp Rlmq e

    ikmjz zpeiklmz z

    qH(zp (zq + ))H((z1 ) zq)(k2 ks)(k1 k2)]

    =(2pi)3

    dz1eikjlz z1

    r

    Rjlr (z1 zr)(kg k1)

    p,q

    Rmjp Rlmq e

    ikmjz zpeiklmz z

    q

    H(zp (zq + ))H((z1 ) zq)(k2 ks)(k1 k2)=(2pi)3

    p,q,r

    Rmjp Rlmq R

    jlr e

    i(kmjz zpklmz zq+kjlz zr)H(zp (zq + ))H(zr (zq + ))

    (k2 ks)(k1 k2)(kg k1)

    (23)

    Note that the parameter > 0 ensures zp > zq and zr > zq which satisfy a lower-higher-lowerrelationship between the pseudo depths.

    37

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    The result for B3IMij is

    B3IMij (kh, z, ) = 2pip,q,rzp>zqzr>zq

    Rmjp Rlmq R

    jlr e

    i(kmjz zpklmz zq+kjlz zr)(kg ks) (24)

    Inverse Fourier transforming over km and kh gives

    B3IMij (kh, k

    z, ) =

    12pi

    dkh

    p,q,r

    Rmjp Rlmq R

    jlr e

    i(kmjz zpklmz zq+kjlz zr)eikhxh . (25)

    The predicted first internal multiple in the space domain is

    IM1stpredicted =12pi

    dkh

    p,q,r

    Rmjp Rlmq Rjlr e

    i(kmjz zpklmz zq+kjlz zr)eikhxh

    2iqis. (26)

    Note that

    M.S.

    Figure 3: The geometry of pseudo depths

    kmjz zp = p,klmz zq = q,kjlz zr = r,khxh = th.

    (27)

    Therefore,

    kmjz zp klmz zq + kjlz zr + khxh = ( p q + r + th) (28)

    38

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    The travel time for the predicted first order internal multiple is

    p q + r + th = (Tp th) (Tq th) + (Tr th) + th= Tp Tq + Tr (29)

    where Tp, Tq and Tr are travel times corresponding to the p-th, q-th, and r-th event, respectively.The travel time for the actual first order internal multiple is

    Ttotal = p q + r + th = (Tp th) (Tq th) + (Tr th) + th= Tp Tq + Tr. (30)

    The result Ttotal = Tp Tq + Tr agrees with the actual arrival time for the first order internalmultiple.

    One can see that reference velocity errors give incorrect vertical and horizontal travel times for eachevent (see equation (16) and (17)). However, equation (29) shows that the errors due to wrongreference velocities can be canceled, and the predicted arrival times remain correct.

    To attenuate an internal multiple for a single frequency requires data at all frequencies. Thisrequirement comes from the integral over temporal frequency when transforming data from thefrequency domain to the pseudo-depth domain. The integral transformation is truncated with band-limited data. The 1.5D example suggests that the algorithm is insensitive to reference velocitiesand hence has potential for spectral extrapolation if we choose reasonable reference velocities.

    4 Conclusion

    In this paper, we have presented an elastic internal multiple attenuation algorithm (Matson, 1997)following the analysis of Nita and Weglein (2005). Although the scattering-based methods usuallyrequire known near surface properties, our study has suggested that the internal multiple attenu-ation algorithm can tolerate errors in reference velocity for 1D earth. The capability of predictingexact travel time without known reference velocities is useful for land application, where the nearsurface properties are often complicated and ill-defined. Moreover, the freedom of choosing ref-erence velocities has potential for the spectral extrapolation. The future direction of this studyincludes extending the algorithm to multi-dimensional elastic case and extrapolation of band-limitedsynthetic data.

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to thank all M-OSRP sponsors for constant support and encouragement. We espe-cially thank all the members in M-OSRP for valuable suggestions.

    References

    Aki, K. and P. G. Richards. Quantitative Seismology. 2nd edition. University Science Books, 2002.

    39

  • Internal multiple reference velocity sensitivity MOSRP08

    Araujo, F. V. Linear and non-linear methods derived from scattering theory: backscattered tomog-raphy and internal multiple attenuation. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1994.

    Carvalho, P. M. Free-surface multiple reflection elimination method based on nonlinear inversionof seismic data. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 1992.

    Hsu, Shih-Ying and Arthur B. Weglein. On-shore project report I Reference velocity sensitivityfor the marine internal multiple attenuation algorithm: analytic examples. Technical report,Mission-Oriented Seismic Research Project, University of Houst on, 2007.

    Matson, K. H. An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating elastic multiples from multi-component land and ocean bottom seismic data. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia,1997.

    Nita, Bogdan G. and Arthur B. Weglein. Inverse scattering internal multiple attenuation algo-rithm in complex multi-d media. Technical report, Mission-Oriented Seismic Research Project,University of Houston, 2005.

    Otnes, Einar, Ketil Hokstad, and Roger Sollie. Attenuation of internal multiples formulticomponent- and towed streamer data.. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 23(2004): 12971300.

    Wang, Min and Arthur B. Weglein. A short note about elastic wavelet estimation. Technical report,Mission-Oriented Seismic Research Project, University of Houst on, 2008.

    Weglein, A. B., F. A. Gasparotto, P. M. Carvalho, and R. H. Stolt. An Inverse-Scattering SeriesMethod for Attenuating Multiples in Seismic Reflection Data. Geophysics 62 (November-December 1997): 19751989.

    Weglein, Arthur B. and Ken H. Matson. Inverse scattering internal multiple attenuation: ananalytic example and subevent interpretation. SPIE, 1998, 108117.

    40