21
National Aeronautics and Space Administration www.nasa.gov An Analysis of the Strayton Engine, a Brayton and Stirling Cycle Recuperating Engine Jeffryes W. Chapman Donald L. Simon Ezra O. McNichols NASA Glenn Research Center 1 AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum, Indianapolis, IN Aug 19-22, 2019 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190030499 2020-04-22T08:06:26+00:00Z

An Analysis of the Strayton Engine, a Brayton and …...National Aeronautics and Space Administration Introduction 2 • What is the Strayton Engine? • A hybrid Brayton cycle / Stirling

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    An Analysis of the Strayton Engine, a Brayton and Stirling Cycle Recuperating Engine

    Jeffryes W. ChapmanDonald L. SimonEzra O. McNicholsNASA Glenn Research Center

    1

    AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum, Indianapolis, INAug 19-22, 2019

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190030499 2020-04-22T08:06:26+00:00Z

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Introduction

    2

    • What is the Strayton Engine?• A hybrid Brayton cycle / Stirling cycle engine concept• Concept developed by Rodger Dyson of NASA Glenn

    Research Center

    • Why investigate the Strayton?• Benefits in efficiency and specific power may be realized by

    utilizing the synergies between the two cycles.

    • Task :• Two week micro seeding was funded to investigate the

    Strayton cycle advantages and identify key technologies and challenges

    The purpose of this paper is to disseminate task findings

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov3

    Thermodynamic Brayton Cycle

    https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/Animation/turbpar/Images/engslo.gif

    (1-2) : Isentropic compression on a gas (2-3) : Heat is added to the system, with no loss in pressure (3-4) : Isentropic decompression occurs where energy can be

    taken from the system as work(4-1) : Waste heat is rejected

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov4

    Thermodynamic Stirling Cycle

    (1-2) : Isothermal volume expansion making use of an external heat source

    (2-3) : Constant volume heat transfer heating up the regenerator (3-4) : Isothermal compression with waste heat rejected to an

    external cold source (4-1) : Constant volume heat transfer occurs to cool the regenerator.

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov 5

    Strayton Engine

    • Single shaft turboshaft with stirling engine embedded within the shaft– Thermal acoustic Stirling engine – Energy moves from the Brayton cycle gas path into the Stirling through turbine blade

    heat transfer– Stirling waste heat is reintroduced to the Brayton cycle before the combustor– Work is gathered from a dual-axis generator (rotational work from the Brayton engine

    and axial work from the Stirling engine)

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    • Simulation created within the numerical propulsion system (NPSS)– NPSS native turbomachinery elements used for Brayton cycle engine components– Stirling cycle engine assumed to be a heat engine with an efficiency of 50% Carnot

    – Interaction between two components managed through power movement into or out of the NPSS duct component

    6

    Simulating the Strayton Cycle

    𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑎𝑎𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 = 1 −𝑇𝑇𝐶𝐶𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    • Thermal modeled as:– Brayton hot side heat transfer through turbine blades

    • Modeled as convection over flat plates– Heat was transferred to and from Brayton and Stirling engines using oscillating heat

    pipes (OHP)• Modeled using an assumed heat transfer coefficient

    – Stirling hot and cold side heat transfer – Brayton cold side heat transfer applied into stage 3

    • Modeled as a heat exchanger with constant effectiveness

    Thermal circuit modeling

    7

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Effect of Brayton cycle engine design criteria

    8

    – Thermal efficiency rises as temperature increases

    – Strayton benefits larger than Brayton only benefits due to system synergies

    • Designed turbine blade temperature limit

    • Overall Pressure ratio– Thermal efficiency rises as

    temperature increases– Brayton cycle benefits greater

    than Strayon due to increases in T3 which reduce the Stirling temperature ratio.

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    • Stirling power fraction : – Increases in power fraction achieved by increasing power flow through the hot section, but

    only up to a point.– Inflection occurs when the drop in Stirling efficiency, due to a reduction in Stirling

    temperature ratio, begins to outweigh the effects of power flow increase– Overall Strayton efficiency drops as the Strayton power ratio continues to reduce

    Effect of Stirling design power

    9

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    • Temperature vs. power flow to the hot side of the stirling– Blade cooling

    • Constant Blade cooling shows increase in Stirling blade cooling effect– Reduction of Stirling temperature ratio

    • As power flow increases Stirling temperature ratio decreases which reduces the efficiency of the Stirling (Note: there is an assumed required 1.4 temperature ratio for the Stirling to operate)

    Strayton Temperature profiles

    10

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Optimized systems

    11

    • 2 power levels where analyzed for this study, 200 HP and 670 HP• Baseline Brayton cycle and Strayton cycle concepts were developed for comparison

    purposes, Tblade = 2750 °R

    • Efficiency gain of ~10% and ~3% at 200 HP and 670 HP power points respectively

    Total Power (HP)

    Brayton Power (HP)

    OPR T liner (°R)

    Efficiency SFC(lbm/HPh)

    Air Mass Flow (lbm/s)

    200 200 6.5 2750 0.24 0.566 1.11670 670 10 2750 0.29 0.433 3.23

    Total Power (HP)

    Brayton Power (HP)

    Stirling Power (HP)

    OPR Tst,H(°R)

    Tst,C (°R) T liner (°R)

    Efficiency SFC(lbm/HPh)

    Air Mass Flow

    (lbm/s)

    Stirling Temperature

    Ratio200 166.62 33.38 6.5 1598 1141 3167 0.33 0.402 0.87 1.4670 640 30.01 10 1761 1246 3117 0.32 0.394 2.57 1.41

    Brayton Cycle Engines

    Strayton Cycle Engines

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    SFC comparison

    12

    0.150

    0.250

    0.350

    0.450

    0.550

    0.650

    0.750

    0.850

    0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000

    SFC

    -lb

    m/H

    Ph

    Shaft Power - HP

    Comparison of IC, Turbine, and Strayton Engines SFC Vs Shaft Power

    IC Engines Turbine Engines Brayton200 Strayton200 Brayton670 Strayton670

    Strayton engine shows SFC similar to internal combustion engines at low power

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Specific power comparison

    13

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    3.50

    4.00

    4.50

    5.00

    0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000

    Spec

    ific

    Pow

    er -

    HP/lb

    m

    Shaft Power - HP

    Comparison of IC, Turbine, and Strayton EnginesSpecific Power Vs Shaft Power

    IC Engines Turbine Engines Brayton200 Strayton200 Brayton670 Strayton670

    Estimated weights of Strayton similar to that of an unmodified gas turbine.

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Stirling controls model

    14

    • Dynamic Stirling controls model (DSCM) based on Ohio University Stirling Engine Analysis (SEA) software, within MATLAB• Design parameters of compression and expansion swept volume and

    clearance volume, cooler, heater, and regenerator size, Stirling frequency, operating fluid, and pressure were tuned to meet predicted power, Stirling temperature ratios, and efficiency taken from the NPSS model.

    CompressionCylinderSpace

    ExpansionCylinder

    Space

    Regenerator

    Cooler Heater

    �̇�𝐶𝐶 �̇�𝐻𝐻

    Compression Swept Volume

    CompressionClearance Volume

    Expansion Swept Volume

    ExpansionClearanceVolume

    Compression

    Cylinder

    Space

    Expansion

    Cylinder

    Space

    Regenerator

    Cooler

    Heater

    Compression Swept Volume

    Compression

    Clearance Volume

    Expansion Swept Volume

    ExpansionClearance Volume

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Stirling controls model

    15

    • Operation begins at the design point and reduces power and adjusts stroke length

    • Strayton efficiency maximized when stroke length reduced as stirling power is reduced

    • Efficiency increased by up to ~3%

    • Highlights requirement for a coupled method of control and potential off design efficiency benefit to the system.

    Strayton Power Output (HP)

    100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210

    Stra

    yton

    Effi

    cien

    cy (%

    )

    0.28

    0.29

    0.3

    0.31

    0.32

    0.33

    0.34

    0.35

    0.36

    100%

    stroke

    95%

    stroke

    90%

    stroke

    85%

    stroke

    80%

    stroke

    75%

    stroke

    70%

    stroke

    100% stroke

    95% stroke

    90% stroke

    85% stroke

    80% stroke

    75% stroke

    70% stroke

    Tblade Limit

    Most Efficient Operating Line

    Design Point

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Key technologiesHigh temperature materials

    16

    • Key to efficient and higher power Strayton is developing higher temperature turbine components.• Currently, low power turbine engines operate with a T4 around

    2000 °R for maintenance and cost benefits• This study examined potential turbine blade temperatures of

    2750 °R and liner temperatures of 3200 °R, which are more in line with large gas turbines with robust blade and liner cooling mechanisms.

    • To achieve the required temperatures materials must be developed to allow greater hot side temperatures at a low cost

    • Research in high temperature ceramics has shown promise, with next-generation ceramic matrix composites expected to reach roughly 3200 °R

    • Additional thermal coatings could raise this to 3500 °R

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Key technologiesStirling Engines

    17

    • New Stirling technologies will need to be examined• High power Stirling engines

    – Thermal acoustic stirling development– Multi-stage Stirling

    • Reliability of stirling engines (Gas turbines typically run for 1000s of hours)– Rotating Stirling

    • Installation/manufacturing of Stirling within a gas turbine shaft

    • Maintainability of Stirling that support line replaceable unit (LRU) access and removal

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Key technologiesBlade cooling / Heat exchangers / heat pipes

    18

    • Heat transfer technologies: Gas turbine to Stirling heat exchanging

    • Rotating/ no pressure rise heat exchanger to increase heat transfer on cold side of Stirling

    • Safe and efficient heat pipes usable at high rotational speeds and temperatures. – Non-volatile medium materials

    • Turbine blade thermal transfer materials or coatings to optimize the ratio between turbine blade cooling effect and Stirling power transfer.

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Key technologiesCoordinated control system

    19

    • Ability to operate transiently through different power levels and within the operational envelope

    • In a typical gas turbine engine component temperature transients can extend into minutes, while customer power demands may need to be met in seconds.

    • Strayton control system must manage this disparity to guarantee power as requirements demand. – Maintain stall margins and temperature limits during transient operation

    utilizing potential control effectors, such as fuel flow, and Stirling stroke length

    – Identifying required control methodology: sensor suite, potential operational schedules.

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov

    Summary and Conclusions• The Strayton Engine: Brayton cycle, Stirling cycle hybrid

    engine concept.– Cycle analysis shows significant efficiency gain over the Brayton cycle

    only engine with increasing gains as temperature is increased.• With a 10% increase (over the Brayton cycle only engine) in efficiency at

    200 HP engine level – Generally greater efficiency gain for lower power generating engines

    because Stirling power level scales with temperature ratio, not Brayton power production.

    – Controls study demonstrates system sensitivity to design parameters and illustrates Stirling off design operation

    20

    • Key Technologies– High temperature materials– Stirling Engines (manufacturability, maintainability, high power capability)– Heat transfer (rotating heat exchangers, heat pipes, turbine blades)– Coordinated control system (seamless operation between systems with very

    different time constants)

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    www.nasa.gov 21

    Acknowledgments

    Funding for this work was provided by the Convergent Aeronautics Solutions (CAS) project.

    An Analysis of the Strayton Engine, a Brayton and Stirling Cycle Recuperating EngineIntroductionSlide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Thermal circuit modelingEffect of Brayton cycle engine design criteriaEffect of Stirling design powerStrayton Temperature profilesOptimized systems SFC comparisonSpecific power comparisonStirling controls modelStirling controls modelKey technologies�High temperature materialsKey technologies�Stirling EnginesKey technologies�Blade cooling / Heat exchangers / heat pipesKey technologies�Coordinated control systemSummary and ConclusionsSlide Number 21