Upload
vuthien
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AMS Committee on Education
14 October 2016 Washington, DC
The American Physical Society
Education Programs
Theodore Hodapp Director of Project Development
Senior Advisor to Education and Diversity
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Guiding Principles
Programs and activities are guided by Committees. Activities are based primarily in physics and closely related disciplines, are designed to have impact on national or international scales, and receive public recognition of APS efforts. Staff and volunteers actively evaluate programs for relevance, audience, and impact – modifying or restructuring as appropriate. As a member society, we insist on transparency and accountability in our actions and in the philosophical underpinnings of our programs.
• Use our unique position • Leverage action • Meet significant needs • Assess impact
2
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
High school classes taught by teacher with degree in the field
3
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
SocialStudies English Biology Math Physics Chemistry
Source: Schools and Staffing Survey
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
High School Students Studying Physics
4
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1987 1990 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013
1000'sofstud
ents
Honors/AP/2ndYearRegularConceptual/PhysicsFirst
Source:AIPStaGsGcalResearchCenter
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 5
Physics / STEM Bachelor Degrees
Source: IPEDS Completion Survey
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015
Physics
All STEM
www.aps.org/programs/education/statistics
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Percentage of Women Earning Undergraduate STEM Degrees
6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
BiologyChemistryMath&StatsEarthSciencesPhysicsEngineering
Source: IPEDS
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 7
Percentage of Women Earning Graduate STEM Degrees
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
AllPhDs
Bio
Geo
Chem
Math&Stats
Eng
CS
Phys
Source: IPEDS
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 8
Hispanic American Bachelor Degrees
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Popula1on
Biology
Engineering
Chemistry
MathandStats
Physics
EarthSciences489
112 Sources: IPEDS Completion survey by race, US Census
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 9
African American Bachelor Degrees
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Popula1on
Chemistry
Biology
MathandStats
Engineering
Physics
EarthSciences169182
Sources: IPEDS Completion survey by race, US Census
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 10
URM Physics PhDs to Minority Population
Sources: IPEDS Completion survey by race, US Census
Only ~30 students!
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Deg
rees
Ear
ned
by U
RM
s [%
]
Bachelor's
PhD
66 PhDs on average
US College-age minority population
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 11
Bachelor and PhD STEM Degrees
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
ComputerScience
BiologicalSciences
Chemistry Engineering Mathema>csandSta>s>cs
Physics Astronomy
Percen
tageofU
RM BS
PhD
63 6 61
386 161
639
78
Source: IPEDS
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Statements
12
8.2 JOINT DIVERSITY STATEMENT(Adopted by Council on November 16, 2008)To ensure a productive future for science and technology in the United States, we must make physics more inclusive. The health of physics requires talent from the broadest demographic pool. Underrepresented groups constitute a largely untapped intellectual resource and a growing segment of the U.S. population.
Therefore, we charge our membership with increasing the numbers of underrepresented minorities in physics in the pipeline and in all professional ranks, with becoming aware of barriers to implementing this change, and with taking an active role in organizational and institutional efforts to bring about such change. We call upon legislators, administrators, and managers at all levels to enact policies and promote budgets that will foster greater diversity in physics. We call upon employers to pursue recruitment, retention, and promotion of underrepresented minority physicists at all ranks and to create a work environment that encourages inclusion. We call upon the physics community as a whole to work collectively to bring greater diversity wherever physicists are educated or employed.
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society; Email: [email protected]
PhysTEC Project Outcomes
2001$%2004$
2004$%2007$
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Arizona%(2001$2007)%
Arkansas%(2001$2008)%
W.%Michigan%(2001$2007)%
Cal%Poly%(2003$2006)%
Colorado%(2004$2007)%
Non$PhysTEC*%
Num
ber%o
f%Teachers%(3%year%to
tals)%
Site%(funding%period)%
Pre%funding%
Y1$Y3%
Y4$Y6%
Post%funding%
Post%funding%
*Number$of$physics$cerOficaOons$averaged$over$319$ins<tu<ons$in$15$states.$Note$that$all$PhysTEC$teachers$are$more$highly$qualified$than$the$minimum$standard$in$most$states.$$
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 15
APS Bridge Program: Key Features
• Recruit through graduate programs (unaccepted students), undergrad programs (promising, but uncompetitive students)
• Establish Bridge Sites (6): • Year 1: Advanced undergraduate or grad courses, introduction to
grad-level research, active mentoring, progress monitoring, social integration into grad school (Project funds)
• Year 2: Take 1st year grad courses, apply to PhD program, research underway (Department funds)
• Place additional students (at Partnership Institutions): • 44 graduate programs looked at “other” applications (2016),
recruited additional students; No direct support, some travel • “COM approved” Partnership Institutions; national recognition of
program • Monitor student/site progress • Research • Disseminate / Advocate
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Institutional Members
16
• Member Institutions • 108 in 36 states
• Partnership Institutions
• 26 in 14 states • Bridge Sites
• Pre-existing: 4 • APS: 6 • Developing: 4
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Bridge Sites and Partnership Institutions
• Admission decisions (“holistic” criteria) • Financial support (timing) • Coursework (induction advising critical, allow
advanced undergrad courses, alternative plan) • Progress monitoring (timing, tutors if needed) • Multiple mentors (intervention, peer involvement) • Research (appropriate match)
17
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Bridge Program Achievements
18
• 23% Female (All: 20%) • 93% URM (All: 6%)
• 64% Hispanic • 24% African American • 5% Native
• 88% Retention (All: 60%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Stud
ents
Le*Program
Placed/Retained
ProjectFunding
20132014201520162017
Na+onalAchievementGap
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.
1143070. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those
of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
What we didn’t know…
…and learning this surprised us! 1. Aggregating applications is a powerful tool 2. Graduate programs (most) want to do better 3. Admissions are not what they seem 4. Applications are expensive 5. Importance of graduate student groups
19
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Some reasons students are not admitted
Students: • Low physics GRE score • Apply to too few places • Apply to wrong places • “Feel” unprepared (self-esteem) • Inadequate preparation: will fail in grad courses • Application materials do not tell a predictive story
Admissions Committees: • Members overwhelmed • Members unaware of admissions research findings
20
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Physics GRE: Impact of Cutoff Scores
21
0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Frac1on(White)
Frac1on(Hispanic)
Frac1on(Black)
Frac1on(Asian)
0.09 (Black)
0.34 (Hispanic)
0.44 (White)
650
0.61 (Asian)
Source: ETS
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
APS Conferences for Undergraduate Women in Physics
• Focus on professional development, networking, understanding pathways
• Attendance more than tripled since APS became involved
• Very good URM attendance • Awarded 3-year grants from DOE, NSF
for 2014-2016 conferences; applications pending to support 2017-2019
• 9 sites for 2016, 10 in 2017 • Inspired C-CUWiP, UK-CUWiP • Coordination of Canadian site in 2017 • Directed research efforts to improve
messaging to women sees positive changes
• National leadership group; Current chair: Kate Scholberg, Duke; Overseen by CSWP
22
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
CUWiP Attendance
Female Physics Degrees Female Physics Degrees
APS Involved
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 23
APS Conferences for Undergraduate Women in Physics
2017 SITES • Harvard • Montana State • Princeton • Rice • UCLA • University of Colorado • University of Wisconsin • Virginia Tech • Wayne State
• McMaster (Ontario)
2017 Conferences: 13-15 January 2017 aps.org/cuwip
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]
Mentoring
24
NNatatioionalMentontoringCommunommunityity
• Support for travel to National Mentoring Conference
• Bringing Emergency Aid to Mentees (2017)
• Increase the number of underrepresented ethnic/racial minority students who complete Bachelor’s degrees in physics
• Support mentoring relationships between undergraduate physics students and local physics mentors
• 100+ mentors, mentees
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 25
Common Job Titles for Physics Bachelors
• Systems Engineer • Electrical Engineer • Design Engineer • Mechanical Engineer • Project Engineer • Optical Engineer • Manufacturing Engineer • Manufacturing Technician • Laser Engineer • Associate Engineer • Application Engineer • Development Engineer • Engineering Technician • Field Engineer
• Process Engineer • Process Technician • Product Engineer • Product Manager • Research Engineer • Test Engineer • General Engineer • Technical Services
Engineer • Software Engineer • Programmer • Web Developer • IT Consultant • Systems Analyst
• Technical Support Staff • Analyst • High School Physics
Teacher • High School Science
Teacher • Middle School Science
Teacher • Research Assistant • Research Associate • Research Technician • Lab Technician • Lab Assistant • Accelerator Operator
Source: AIP SRC
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 26
Recommendations
• Flexible majors • Emphasize applications throughout • Add contemporary lab skills • Encourage industry-relevant capstone projects • Interweave communications throughout • Consider interdisciplinary experiences/majors • Internships / co-op experiences • Seminars on career preparation • Engage alumni • Have events with industrial/applied topics • Fields trips / site visits • Tap career resources on campus • Encourage mentoring www.aps.org/nmc
NNatatioionalMentontoringCommunommunityity
www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 27
Integrating Research and Best Practices into Physics Program
Assessment and Review 1. Develop a guide for self-assessment of undergraduate physics
programs founded on documented best practices linked to measurable outcomes
The guide should provide a physics-community-based resource to assist programs in developing a culture of continuous self-improvement, in keeping with their individual mission, context, and institutional type. The guide should include considerations of curricula, pedagogy, advising, mentoring, recruitment and retention, research and internship opportunities, diversity, scientific skill development, career/workforce preparation, staffing, resources, and faculty professional development.
2. Recommend a plan for ongoing review and improvement of this guide under the oversight of the APS COE