27
AMS Committee on Education 14 October 2016 Washington, DC The American Physical Society Education Programs Theodore Hodapp Director of Project Development Senior Advisor to Education and Diversity

AMS Committee on Education · AMS Committee on Education 14 ... Underrepresented groups constitute a largely untapped intellectual resource and a growing segment ... by CSWP 22 0

  • Upload
    vuthien

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AMS Committee on Education

14 October 2016 Washington, DC

The American Physical Society

Education Programs

Theodore Hodapp Director of Project Development

Senior Advisor to Education and Diversity

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Guiding Principles

Programs and activities are guided by Committees. Activities are based primarily in physics and closely related disciplines, are designed to have impact on national or international scales, and receive public recognition of APS efforts. Staff and volunteers actively evaluate programs for relevance, audience, and impact – modifying or restructuring as appropriate. As a member society, we insist on transparency and accountability in our actions and in the philosophical underpinnings of our programs.

•  Use our unique position •  Leverage action •  Meet significant needs •  Assess impact

2

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

High school classes taught by teacher with degree in the field

3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

SocialStudies English Biology Math Physics Chemistry

Source: Schools and Staffing Survey

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

High School Students Studying Physics

4

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1987 1990 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013

1000'sofstud

ents

Honors/AP/2ndYearRegularConceptual/PhysicsFirst

Source:AIPStaGsGcalResearchCenter

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 5

Physics / STEM Bachelor Degrees

Source: IPEDS Completion Survey

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015

Physics

All STEM

www.aps.org/programs/education/statistics

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Percentage of Women Earning Undergraduate STEM Degrees

6

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

BiologyChemistryMath&StatsEarthSciencesPhysicsEngineering

Source: IPEDS

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 7

Percentage of Women Earning Graduate STEM Degrees

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011

AllPhDs

Bio

Geo

Chem

Math&Stats

Eng

CS

Phys

Source: IPEDS

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 8

Hispanic American Bachelor Degrees

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Popula1on

Biology

Engineering

Chemistry

MathandStats

Physics

EarthSciences489

112 Sources: IPEDS Completion survey by race, US Census

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 9

African American Bachelor Degrees

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Popula1on

Chemistry

Biology

MathandStats

Engineering

Physics

EarthSciences169182

Sources: IPEDS Completion survey by race, US Census

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 10

URM Physics PhDs to Minority Population

Sources: IPEDS Completion survey by race, US Census

Only ~30 students!

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Deg

rees

Ear

ned

by U

RM

s [%

]

Bachelor's

PhD

66 PhDs on average

US College-age minority population

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 11

Bachelor and PhD STEM Degrees

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

22%

ComputerScience

BiologicalSciences

Chemistry Engineering Mathema>csandSta>s>cs

Physics Astronomy

Percen

tageofU

RM BS

PhD

63 6 61

386 161

639

78

Source: IPEDS

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Statements

12

8.2 JOINT DIVERSITY STATEMENT(Adopted by Council on November 16, 2008)To ensure a productive future for science and technology in the United States, we must make physics more inclusive. The health of physics requires talent from the broadest demographic pool. Underrepresented groups constitute a largely untapped intellectual resource and a growing segment of the U.S. population.

Therefore, we charge our membership with increasing the numbers of underrepresented minorities in physics in the pipeline and in all professional ranks, with becoming aware of barriers to implementing this change, and with taking an active role in organizational and institutional efforts to bring about such change. We call upon legislators, administrators, and managers at all levels to enact policies and promote budgets that will foster greater diversity in physics. We call upon employers to pursue recruitment, retention, and promotion of underrepresented minority physicists at all ranks and to create a work environment that encourages inclusion. We call upon the physics community as a whole to work collectively to bring greater diversity wherever physicists are educated or employed.

PhysTEC Member Institutions

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society; Email: [email protected]

PhysTEC Project Outcomes

2001$%2004$

2004$%2007$

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Arizona%(2001$2007)%

Arkansas%(2001$2008)%

W.%Michigan%(2001$2007)%

Cal%Poly%(2003$2006)%

Colorado%(2004$2007)%

Non$PhysTEC*%

Num

ber%o

f%Teachers%(3%year%to

tals)%

Site%(funding%period)%

Pre%funding%

Y1$Y3%

Y4$Y6%

Post%funding%

Post%funding%

*Number$of$physics$cerOficaOons$averaged$over$319$ins<tu<ons$in$15$states.$Note$that$all$PhysTEC$teachers$are$more$highly$qualified$than$the$minimum$standard$in$most$states.$$

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 15

APS Bridge Program: Key Features

•  Recruit through graduate programs (unaccepted students), undergrad programs (promising, but uncompetitive students)

•  Establish Bridge Sites (6): •  Year 1: Advanced undergraduate or grad courses, introduction to

grad-level research, active mentoring, progress monitoring, social integration into grad school (Project funds)

•  Year 2: Take 1st year grad courses, apply to PhD program, research underway (Department funds)

•  Place additional students (at Partnership Institutions): •  44 graduate programs looked at “other” applications (2016),

recruited additional students; No direct support, some travel •  “COM approved” Partnership Institutions; national recognition of

program •  Monitor student/site progress •  Research •  Disseminate / Advocate

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Institutional Members

16

• Member Institutions •  108 in 36 states

• Partnership Institutions

•  26 in 14 states • Bridge Sites

• Pre-existing: 4 • APS: 6 • Developing: 4

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Bridge Sites and Partnership Institutions

• Admission decisions (“holistic” criteria) • Financial support (timing) • Coursework (induction advising critical, allow

advanced undergrad courses, alternative plan) • Progress monitoring (timing, tutors if needed) • Multiple mentors (intervention, peer involvement) • Research (appropriate match)

17

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Bridge Program Achievements

18

•  23% Female (All: 20%) •  93% URM (All: 6%)

•  64% Hispanic •  24% African American •  5% Native

•  88% Retention (All: 60%)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Stud

ents

Le*Program

Placed/Retained

ProjectFunding

20132014201520162017

Na+onalAchievementGap

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.

1143070. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

What we didn’t know…

…and learning this surprised us! 1.  Aggregating applications is a powerful tool 2.  Graduate programs (most) want to do better 3.  Admissions are not what they seem 4.  Applications are expensive 5.  Importance of graduate student groups

19

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Some reasons students are not admitted

Students: • Low physics GRE score • Apply to too few places • Apply to wrong places •  “Feel” unprepared (self-esteem) •  Inadequate preparation: will fail in grad courses • Application materials do not tell a predictive story

Admissions Committees: • Members overwhelmed • Members unaware of admissions research findings

20

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Physics GRE: Impact of Cutoff Scores

21

0.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Frac1on(White)

Frac1on(Hispanic)

Frac1on(Black)

Frac1on(Asian)

0.09 (Black)

0.34 (Hispanic)

0.44 (White)

650

0.61 (Asian)

Source: ETS

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

APS Conferences for Undergraduate Women in Physics

•  Focus on professional development, networking, understanding pathways

•  Attendance more than tripled since APS became involved

•  Very good URM attendance •  Awarded 3-year grants from DOE, NSF

for 2014-2016 conferences; applications pending to support 2017-2019

•  9 sites for 2016, 10 in 2017 •  Inspired C-CUWiP, UK-CUWiP •  Coordination of Canadian site in 2017 •  Directed research efforts to improve

messaging to women sees positive changes

•  National leadership group; Current chair: Kate Scholberg, Duke; Overseen by CSWP

22

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

CUWiP Attendance

Female Physics Degrees Female Physics Degrees

APS Involved

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 23

APS Conferences for Undergraduate Women in Physics

2017 SITES •  Harvard •  Montana State •  Princeton •  Rice •  UCLA •  University of Colorado •  University of Wisconsin •  Virginia Tech •  Wayne State

•  McMaster (Ontario)

2017 Conferences: 13-15 January 2017 aps.org/cuwip

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected]

Mentoring

24

NNatatioionalMentontoringCommunommunityity

•  Support for travel to National Mentoring Conference

•  Bringing Emergency Aid to Mentees (2017)

•  Increase the number of underrepresented ethnic/racial minority students who complete Bachelor’s degrees in physics

•  Support mentoring relationships between undergraduate physics students and local physics mentors

•  100+ mentors, mentees

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 25

Common Job Titles for Physics Bachelors

•  Systems Engineer •  Electrical Engineer •  Design Engineer •  Mechanical Engineer •  Project Engineer •  Optical Engineer •  Manufacturing Engineer •  Manufacturing Technician •  Laser Engineer •  Associate Engineer •  Application Engineer •  Development Engineer •  Engineering Technician •  Field Engineer

•  Process Engineer •  Process Technician •  Product Engineer •  Product Manager •  Research Engineer •  Test Engineer •  General Engineer •  Technical Services

Engineer •  Software Engineer •  Programmer •  Web Developer •  IT Consultant •  Systems Analyst

•  Technical Support Staff •  Analyst •  High School Physics

Teacher •  High School Science

Teacher •  Middle School Science

Teacher •  Research Assistant •  Research Associate •  Research Technician •  Lab Technician •  Lab Assistant •  Accelerator Operator

Source: AIP SRC

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 26

Recommendations

•  Flexible majors •  Emphasize applications throughout •  Add contemporary lab skills •  Encourage industry-relevant capstone projects •  Interweave communications throughout •  Consider interdisciplinary experiences/majors •  Internships / co-op experiences •  Seminars on career preparation •  Engage alumni •  Have events with industrial/applied topics •  Fields trips / site visits •  Tap career resources on campus •  Encourage mentoring www.aps.org/nmc

NNatatioionalMentontoringCommunommunityity

www.aps.org ©2016, American Physical Society, [email protected] 27

Integrating Research and Best Practices into Physics Program

Assessment and Review 1.  Develop a guide for self-assessment of undergraduate physics

programs founded on documented best practices linked to measurable outcomes

The guide should provide a physics-community-based resource to assist programs in developing a culture of continuous self-improvement, in keeping with their individual mission, context, and institutional type. The guide should include considerations of curricula, pedagogy, advising, mentoring, recruitment and retention, research and internship opportunities, diversity, scientific skill development, career/workforce preparation, staffing, resources, and faculty professional development.

2.  Recommend a plan for ongoing review and improvement of this guide under the oversight of the APS COE