Upload
indraneal-roy
View
483
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
I IPM
SUBMITTED BY: -
Indraneal Roy
IIPM(PGP-09-11)SS
THE BRAND CALLED AMITABH BACHCHAN
Brand
A product or service to which human beings attach a bundle of tangible (functional
product and service characteristics) and intangible (emotional and/or symbolic)
meanings that add value. A brand has one strategic purpose and that is to
differentiate itself from competitors.
Brand Personality
An expression of the fundamental core values and characteristics of a brand
described and experienced as human personality traits, e.g. friendly, intelligent,
innovative etc. It is an expression of the relationship between the consumer and the
brand. Brand image or identity expressed in terms of human characteristics. The
distinguishing and identifiable characteristics that offer consistent, enduring,
predictable messages and perceptions is brand identity. The look and feel of the
brand through the eyes of the consumer is brand image.
Few examples:
• Marlboro is ‘masculine’ while Virginia Slims is ‘feminine’
• IBM is ‘older’ while Apple is ‘younger’
• India Today is ‘old-fashioned’ while Outlook is ‘trendier’
• Coke is ‘conforming’ while Pepsi is ‘irreverent’
Brand Personality, like human personality, is both distinctive and enduring. Both
are built over a period of time. Refers to the outcome of all the consumer’s
experiences with the brand In other words, the brand’s personality is the
weighted average of previous impressions. In consumer’s mind, these
impressions merge to form an overall concept of what to expect from brand.
Brand Personality is eagerly searched by brand strategists and researchers.
Differences in responses by different consumers provide useful insights. For
example, users of a product will perceive a brand different from non-users.
‘Personality traits are what the brand will live and die for’
2 | P a g e
Why use brand personality?
Enriches understanding
• Helps gain an in-depth understanding of consumer perceptions of and
attitudes towards the brand
• Can provide more insight than is gained by asking about attribute perceptions
• For ex., Microsoft, IBM etc.,
Contributes to a differentiating identity
• Can differentiate brands especially where brands are similar in product
attributes
• In fact, it can define not only the brand but the product class context and
experience
• Mercedes Vs BMW; Clinic Plus Vs Pantene
Creates brand equity
• Builds long-term brand equity
• Differentiates the brand and makes it distinct from other competitive offerings
• Serves as a powerful relationship device
How to create brand personality?
• Personality of a person is affected by everything associated with him –
friends, neighborhood, activities, clothes etc.,
• So too is a brand personality
Product-related characteristics
• Product-related characteristics can be primary drivers of a brand personality
– Even the product class can affect personality
• Banks, Insurance etc., tend to be Competent, Serious, Masculine, Older and
Upper-class
3 | P a g e
• Athletic shoes tend to be Young, Lively, Rugged, Outdoorsy, Adventurous
etc.,
• Product attributes can often affect brand personality
• A ‘light’ beer would largely be classy, sophisticated etc.,
• A high-priced brand will be considered wealthy, stylish and perhaps snobbish!
User imagery
• Can be powerful driver of personality because user is already a person and so
conceptualizing the personality is reduced
• User Imagery can be people who use the brand or those portrayed in
advertising
Sponsorships
• Activities such as events sponsored by the brand will influence its personality
• Pond’s sponsoring Femina’s ‘Miss India’ contest
• Budweiser sponsoring the blimp in American sporting events
Age
• How long a brand has been on the market can affect its personality
• New entrants like Apple, Outlook etc., tend to have younger brand
personalities than IBM, India Today etc.,
Symbol
• A symbol can be a powerful influence on brand personality since it can be
controlled and can have extremely strong associations
• Some examples…
– Apple’s bitten apple
– Nike’s swoosh
– MetLife’s Peanuts character
4 | P a g e
How Brand Positioning creates brand equity?
The ways brand personality can create brand equity are summarized by 3
models:
1. The Self-Expression Model
2. The Relationship Basis Model
3. The Functional Benefit Representation Model
The self-expression model
• The basic premise is that for some customers, some brands become vehicles
to express a part of their self-identity
• This self-identity can be their actual identity or an ideal self to which they
might aspire
• Apple is perceived as friendly, unpretentious, irreverent and willing to go
against the grain
– This is because Mac is easy-to-use and also due to its symbol,
advertising, user groups etc.,
– The use of Apple expresses a personal identity of being non-corporate
and creative
How brand helps express personality?
Feelings engendered by brand personality
• There can be a set of feelings and emotions attached to a brand personality,
just as there are to a person
– The use of such brands can cause feelings and emotions to emerge
5 | P a g e
• Feelings, when using a Harley-Davidson or Apple would not emerge when
using a Honda or Compaq
The brand as a badge
• A brand could serve as a consumer’s personal statement
• Cars, cosmetics, apparels lend themselves to personality expression because
their use occurs in a social context with relatively high involvement
The brand becomes part of the self
• The ultimate personality expression occurs when a brand becomes an
extension or an integral part of the self
• The executive who wears Allen Solly on a Friday feels semi-casual and
waiting to welcoming the weekend!
• The potential to create this oneness with some people can represent a
significant opportunity for a brand
The relationship basis model
• Some people may never aspire to have a certain personality trait but would
like to have a relationship with one who has that
• A trustworthy, dependable, conservative personality might be seen boring but
sought nevertheless, from banks or financial products
• The concept of a relationship between a brand and a person provides a
different perspective on how brand personality might work
• To see how this model works, consider personality types of people with whom
we have relationships and the nature of those relationships
• Spirited, young, up-to-date, outgoing
Pepsi
6 | P a g e
On a weekend evening, it might be enjoyable to have a friend who has
these personality features
• Two elements affect individual’s relationship with a brand
1. Relationship between the brand-as-person and the customer
– Which is analogous to the relationship between two people
2. The brand personality
– The type of person the brand represents
Functional benefit representation model
• The previous two models provide contexts in which brand personality can be
the basis for a brand strategy and a link to the customer
• A brand personality can also play a more indirect role by being a vehicle for
representing and cueing functional benefits and brand attributes
• Marlboro’s personality of a macho, freedom-loving, adventurous person
suggests that the product is strong
• Harley Davidson’s personality of a rugged, macho, I-am-different-kind
suggests that the product is a powerful, liberating vehicle
• When a visual symbol or image exists that can create and cue personality…
…the ability of the personality to reinforce brand attributes will be
greater
• The Energizer rabbit is an upbeat, indefatigable personality who never runs
out of energy
Just as the battery it symbolizes runs longer than others
7 | P a g e
• A brand personality that represents a functional benefit or attribute may be
relatively ineffective if it lacks a visual image established in the customer’s
mind
• A country or region of origin can add credibility to an identity
It can generate a strong personality that provides a quality cue and a
key point of differentiation
A brand personality can help a brand in several ways:
– It can provide a vehicle for customers to express their own identity
– A brand personality metaphor helps suggests the kind of relationship
that customer has with brand
– Brand personalities serve to represent and cue functional benefits and
product attributes well
• Importantly, brand personality is often a sustainable point of differentiation
– Sustainable because it is very difficult to copy a personality
A CASE STUDY ON BRAND POSITIONING & BRAND
ARCHITECTURE ENHANCEMENT
Measuring Brand Personality
The appropriate measurement of existing brand personality imagery has been
studied for over twenty years (Plummer 1984-85). Researchers have quite naturally
sought to develop a valid and reliable measurement (survey) instrument of brand
personality that is generalizable enough to be usable across various product
categories and consumer segments, drawing on the extensive literature on human
personality (Digman 1990; McCrae and Costa 1987), but going beyond it where
necessary (Batra, Lehmann and Singh 1993). The measurement instrument used
8 | P a g e
most often recently is the one developed by Aaker (1997). In her extensive
development of this instrument, she sought to develop scales “generalizable across
product categories” (Aaker 1997, p. 348), by having 631 respondents rate each of 37
brands on 114 personality traits - with these brands being carefully selected to
represent a broad array of product/service categories, a few brands per category.
She factor analyzed the between-brand variance after averaging the scores of each
brand on each personality trait across multiple respondents. In other words, the data
matrix she factor-analyzed was based on pooled data from 37 brands across
multiple product categories. Using this aggregated category/brand matrix, she found
five factors, labelled Sincerity (sample item: honest), Excitement (daring),
Competence (reliable), Sophistication (upper-class), and Ruggedness (tough); her
scale is described in more detail below.
Two Explanations of Category Influence
It is widely acknowledged that “most of the research papers on brand personality are
now based on Aaker's scale”. Though her scale is not without its critics. It has been
criticized on conceptual grounds, with some critics questioning whether the aspects
being measured truly represent “personality” (Azoulay and Kapferer 2003; Caprara,
Barbaranelli and Guido 2001). Empirically, some others have complained that it does
not replicate well in other countries and consumer samples, especially when it is
used to gauge within-category brand personality differences. Importantly for present
purposes, it has also been pointed out that some brand personality scale items
appear, depending on the category, to pick up functional product category
characteristics rather than brand personality ones. Thus in one study the brands
rated highest on “energetic” were energizer drinks, while the item “sensuous” was
most associated with ice cream brands (Romaniuk and Ehrenberg 2003).
There is, however, another intriguing and important possible substantive explanation
for these “category interaction” results: those entire product categories such as
alcoholic beverages (or sub-categories such as beer or wine), not simply brands
within them, also are perceived to possess a “personality.” This explanation may in
9 | P a g e
fact complement the measurement explanation provided above. Levy (1986, p. 216-
217) wrote “a primary source of meaning is the product (category) itself,” pointing out
that within the beverage category liqueurs connote discrimination, while wine
symbolizes snobbism, beer sociability and democracy, soup tradition. Coffee is seen
as stronger and more masculine, tea as weaker and more feminine. Consistent with
his ideas, Domzal and Kernan (1992) found that ads for most beers typically
highlighted friendship and social consumption, while liquor ads stressed solitude,
relaxation, extroverted festivity, as well as status communication. Levy highlighted
how user stereotypes - a common source of brand personality (Keller 1993) - differ
for specific food categories: chunky peanut butter for boys, but smooth peanut butter
for girls; lamb chops and salads for women, steaks for men. Other researchers such
as Lautman (1991) have also noted that consumers appear to have a “schema” for
different categories, clusters of inter-connected emotions, facts and perceptions
stored in memory as a unit. Durgee and Stuart (1987) found that consumers
associate “fun” with the entire ice-cream category. Batra and Homer (2004, p. 321)
report finding potato chips rated more “fun” than expensive cookies, which were
rated as more “sophisticated and classy.”
The Importance of studying Brand Personality across Categories
In this paper, we maintain that entire product, not just brands, possess characteristic
personalities.
Several consequences, which are important to marketing managers, flow from this
thesis. First, market leaders often need to modify an entire category’s personality, to
make its consumption more attractive to a broader target market. Thus in recent
years Coca-Cola sought to make diet Colas more appealing to men by making these
drinks seem less “feminine,” just as beer companies have tried to increase
consumption by women by making them seem less “masculine.” The Milk Board
attempts to portray milk consumption as “adult,” not just for children.
Second, a major avenue for revenue growth in companies today is the extension of
their existing brands into new categories, requiring the systematic study of many
candidate categories on “personality” and “image” dimensions to see which ones
best “fit” and “match” the personality of the brand being extended (Keller 2003b,
10 | P a g e
p.602). Many companies also seek to leverage their existing brand assets via
licensing deals to other manufacturers in other categories (such as Caterpillar and
Harley into shoes and boots, both made by Wolverine Footwear); or via co-branding
promotions and arrangements (such as Coach with Lexus, or Harley-Davidson and
Eddie Bauer with Ford trucks). In all these cases, the company that owns the high-
equity brand needs to explore which of many candidate product categories
represents the highest-potential licensing or co-branding opportunities, by studying
the personality characteristics of these categories in depth.
Third, even when the object of study is one particular category, there are many
occasions when a researcher might wish to collect and analyze the personality data
of brands coming from multiple categories. Such data analysis can often offer
substantial strategic insight into the “meanings” of a particular brand, by showing
which brands in other categories are seen by consumers as being similar to it in a
personality sense (see, for example, the correspondence analyses discussed by
Collins 2002). Recently, for instance, an analysis showed that presidential candidate
John Kerry was perceived as similar to Starbucks and Heineken, while George Bush
was seen as similar to brands Dunkin Donuts and Bud Light (Landor Associates
2004). Such cross-category analogies are frequently used as sources of insight into
brand personality (Plummer 1984-5). Brands from multiple categories are also often
compared and ranked on their personality strengths and weaknesses, as is done by
the well-known Young and Rubicam Global Brand Asset Valuator (Agres and
Dubitsky 1996), which collects data on brands from a large number of categories and
analyzes them jointly. And research seeking to create a generalizable brand
personality measurement inventory (such as Aaker 1997) naturally collects and
analyzes personality data on many brands from multiple categories.
In all these cases, any factor analysis of a pooled brand × category data matrix must
partial out the “category personality” from the “brand's personality,” for otherwise it
could confound the two. It could be argued, of course, that most analyses of brand
personality are conducted entirely within one relevant category, and do not need to
utilize data from several product categories. Even here, however, when these single-
category brand personality data are analyzed to assess the differentiation of one
brand from another, and used to help explain differences in brand preference data, it
is important to partial-out those aspects of brand personality which are category-
11 | P a g e
generic (“points of parity,” cf. Keller 2003b, p.133), to identify those which are truly
differentiating (“points-of-difference”). It could be argued that the latter ought to be
possibly more predictive of brand preference, if the “category-generic” aspects are
not drivers of final brand choice because they are common to all brands in that
category. It could also be the case, however, that brands which best capture a
category’s mythic “desired” personality might gain in preference, since their brand
personality is now most “relevant” to consumer choice criteria in that category (Batra
and Homer 2004). In either case, it is critical to obtain and understand the “category
personality” context within which the personality of the various brands within it must
be studied.
THE EVERGREEN CELEBRITY
Celeb endorsers may come and go but Amitabh stays. Finding another facet
to his many-sided persona is a challenging task for marketers.
MARKETERS have been leveraging celebrity appeal for a long time. Across
categories, whether in products or services, more and
more brands are banking on the mass appeal of
celebrities. As soon as a new face ascends the
popularity charts, advertisers queue up to have it
splashed all over. Witness the spectacular rise of
Sania Mirza and Irfan Pathan in endorsements in a
matter of a few months. Such is the frenzy that multiple
celebrities are endorsing one brand and super
celebrities are promoting several products. The latter
run the risk of diluting their persona and delivering
diminishing returns for advertisers.
A unique phenomenon
12 | P a g e
Usually, celebrities are super achievers at the peak of their professions. For
example, sportspersons get flooded with offers from marketers to endorse various
products when they are at the height of their popularity. This fame is proportional to
the sporting achievements. So is the case with the top film stars. Eminent examples
are Sachin Tendulkar and Shah Rukh Khan. Similarly, the popularity of TV
programmes makes the actors in them quite popular and some of them do endorse
products. Once the sportsperson retires or the actors loses their charm at the box-
office or the TRPs of the TV programmes come down, the endorsements also
dwindle.
Amitabh Bachchan is an exception to this normal life cycle of a celebrity in terms of
endorsements. An actor by profession, his best days at the box-office are well
behind. Yet, his endorsements do not seem to stop. An immensely successful actor
of more than three-and-a-half decades in the Hindi film industry, a failed politician, a
stumbling businessman and anchor of just one TV programme - his is a unique
combination. It is noteworthy that during the first two-and-a-half decades of his acting
career in more than a 100 films, he never endorsed any product. This, at a time
when for nearly two decades he reigned over Bollywood and was called the one-man
Hindi film industry.
His seemingly risky foray into anchoring Kaun Banega Crorepati(KBC) in the year
2000 added several notches to his already phenomenal popularity and catapulted
him into the league of the most expensive endorsers. The way Zanjeer transformed
his acting career, KBC opened the floodgates of endorsements. Marketers found
their single-point attention-grabber in Amitabh Bachchan who could not only
command attention but also lend credibility to their brands.What set him apart from
others and drew a host of marketers to leverage his personality was his popularity
across the length and breadth of India, cutting across the barriers of age, income,
region and language. Long after he gave up shouldering the box-office appeal of
films single-handedly and four years after the last episode of the first round
of KBC was telecast, he still lords it over the popularity charts and endorses a wide
array of products.
Amitabh the Endorser
13 | P a g e
Across product categories, Amitabh's persona began to be leveraged by marketers.
Within a span of four years, he has endorsed brands in product categories as
diverse as banking, soft drinks, batteries, paints, chocolates, automobiles, writing
instruments, apparel, diet supplements, personal care and real estate. Contrast this
with his earlier endorsement history - just one in the mid-'90s, a corporate branding
exercise for BPL. Through a campaign developed by Dhar & Hoon, BPL managed to
position itself as an aspirational Indian brand.
The basic premise in getting a celebrity to endorse a product is that the instant
recognition provided by the celebrity cuts through the clutter. Amidst an overload of
advertising, this feature guarantees an advertisement's ability to stand out and
generate awareness. If there is a fit between the personality of the celebrity and the
brand characteristics, top-of-the-mind recall is also ensured. If the endorser enjoys
wide popularity among different geographic and demographic segments, so much
the better.
One of his strengths was his unblemished personality. As an endorser stakes his
reputation and credibility in endorsing products, the cleaner the track record the
14 | P a g e
greater the trustworthiness. This aspect was exploited by Cadbury's well. When it
was enveloped in the controversy regarding worm-infested packs of its Dairy Milk
chocolate brand, one of its responses to regain public confidence was to show him
visiting its plants and vouching for the safety of its chocolates in its commercials.
Nerolac Paints was another brand that leveraged his credibility by having him assure
the audience, `Hum keh rahe hain' in its commercials.
When Eveready's storyboard for its torchlight Jeevan Sathi revolved around the
product as a dowry item, Amitabh put his foot down and refused to endorse it.
Respecting his feelings and recognising the advertisement's limitations, Eveready
shelved it. Instances such as this reinforce his credibility and strengthen his brand
value.
As a person with a social conscience, he has also lent his star appeal to public and
social causes such as the polio eradication programme, emancipation of children
and preventing cruelty to animals. The campaigns for Pulse Polio, Unicef and People
for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) featured him prominently to have a big
impact on the audience.
The critical issues
Getting Amitabh, who enjoys a larger-than-life image, to endorse a product is a
costly proposition. His endorsements cost between Rs 5 crore and Rs 12 crore. With
such exorbitantly high endorsement fees, questions are being raised about the
returns on having him as a celebrity. For multinationals with deep pockets such as
Pepsi, having Amitabh as a brand ambassador and renewing the contract may be
affordable. But for others, the temptation to use him as a one-off exercise is strong.
For example, ICICI did not renew its deal with Amitabh after it expired in 2002.
Maruti, which signed both Amitabh and his actor son Abhishek for its Versa, is
conspicuously low-key in its ads for the vehicle of late. Unlike sales promotions,
advertisements take a longer time to have an impact on sales. Top-of-the-mind
brand recall and awareness generation are easier to track, but unless these increase
sales, establishing the ROI on investments in celebrity endorsements may be
difficult.
15 | P a g e
Overexposure, however, is the major issue, with Amitabh endorsing too many
products. His face has promoted a slew of products in categories as diverse as
beverages, paints, financial services, garments, automobiles, stationery, food
supplements, personal care, real estate, batteries, televisions, chocolates and
jeweler. Moreover, he has a `guest appearance' in P&G's commercial for its
detergent brand Tide (shot while filming Baghban). Nevertheless, marketers claim to
be happy having him endorse their brands. "Using Amitabh Bachchan as our brand
ambassador has helped in strengthening our brand image and recall within the target
audience," said D. K. Jain, Chairman and President, Luxor Writing Instruments Pvt.
Ltd, the marketer of the Parker brand, in an interview to Brand Speak on
exchange4media.com.
However, the enigma of his personality faces the risk of being unraveled. Exclusivity
can no longer be associated with him. The audience gets confused when the same
celebrity plugs many brands. The endorsement value gets eroded and the brands
end up as just another product among the many endorsed and do not stand apart.
As brand domain expert Harish Bijoor said in a previous issue of Catalyst, "Brands
that use the promiscuous brand endorser who will endorse a car just now, carburetor
oil next and stockings in yet another installment of advertising blitz do not contribute
much to the brand-building process
Marketers at crossroads
Marketers now face a dilemma in exploiting Amitabh’s persona further. A wide range
of emotions such as humor and anger have been exploited from his acting
repertoire. He has been a patronizing, avuncular person; an action hero; an
energizing personality; a jovial character; an advisor; a spokesperson; and a
passionate endorser. The challenge for marketers is - how to stretch such a widely
leveraged personality? How does one ensure that the enormous amounts invested in
this expensive brand ambassador are well-utilized?
As for Amitabh, he soldiers on in his pursuit of creative satisfaction in roles written
specifically for him in Bollywood and attempts to resuscitate his corporate dream in
the avatar of AB Corp. There's no stopping his endorsements, however. He is
expected to sign deals worth Rs 30 crore to Rs 50 crore over the next couple of
16 | P a g e
years. Can KBC's proposed second innings herald a follow-on for Amitabh's
endorsement deals? Or will it find few takers with marketers feeling his persona
cannot be extended further for fresh endorsements in advertising?
BRAND AMITABH BACHCHAN – AND ITS LIFE CYCLE
Much like a product life cycle; there is also a brand life cycle – while product life
cycle is an eventuality – determined by two factors
a) Evolving Consumer Lives and
b) Technological Advancement.
Brand lifecycles can be a lot longer, determined by the
Brand’s ability to re-invent itself based on the very two
factors listed above.
We will look at one such Mega brand in the Indian context. The brand is called
Amitabh Bachchan. It has existed for the past 35 years.
Brand Amitabh Bachchan has a 90%+ awareness levels amongst Indians (At least
90% of Indians will know of the brand – kids below 2 and tribal’s excluded), will have
a 70%+ penetration (at least two out of three Indians would have
experienced/consumed the brand across media – TV, print, Internet, films and
books) and there would be at least a 30% repeat consumer base. At least one out of
three Indians would have consumed it more than twice.
I must admit, this is no Nielson data. This is purely based on gut and the best
judgment of this writer.
17 | P a g e
Much like any other brand, this brand has had its high and lows, but has managed to
emerge out of every low so far, evolved and expanded itself riding the very two
factors above. At every crossroad, it has managed to re-invent itself and expanded
its product offering to become more relevant to its consumers. It retained the brand
character; fine tuned its attributes to changing times and products, and expanded its
distribution via media choices. It started from Films only to TV to Print to Internet; it’s
now available simultaneously across all forms of media.
While it started as a film character, the brand had a certain set of core values, that
could be personified on screen – Unconventional good looks, Angry, against the
odds, fire in the belly, espousing Core Indian Values of high relationship quotient
(emotional bonding with relations and friends), Social equilibrium (voice of the
downtrodden), Humble son of the soil. Irrespective of the film – you could almost say
what this character will or will not do.
In short – very strong equity and a well detailed brand character map.
The brand tugged at the hearts of millions of Indians, and was an instant hit – film
after film. It was carefully handled by a few directors and screenplay writers (brand
managers). Until it reached a point where those brand managers were not available
anymore and the brand began to falter. But by this time, the person, who had played
the brand year on year, began to understand himself. Thus, the brand was re-
launched via television. The basic character intact, with a slight makeover, the same
character map as earlier – just with a bit of tinkering to dial up a few values and dial
down some others. For Instance – Core Indian Values (Relationship quotient), Social
equilibrium were dialed up a bit.
18 | P a g e
This worked well for the brand; the equity was further strengthened via product
endorsements along similar lines. But after a point in time, it needed another
makeover. And this time it was the Internet in the form of blogs. Creating a sub
community amongst loyal consumers and giving itself a new lease of life.
What has helped immensely is the distribution expansion via the choice of media to
ensure distribution and consumption. It has only expanded with time, reflecting the
changing consumer lifestyle and technological advancement.
CASE STUDY: AMITABH BACHCHAN - REPOSITIONING A
TOMORROW'S BRAND
Introduction
Amitabh Bachchan, the brand manager of Brand AB is in a dilemma. He
understands how important Brand AB is to the industry. He had told an interviewer,
"With the change in the country and the economy and the boom in entertainment, I
felt the need for a professional attitude towards the entertainment industry.
I am no longer an individual but a corporate entity. They have invested money in me
as a brand. They can recover the money through whatever the brand can do: act,
sing, do a concert, endorse a product." The current situation is clearly showing that
Brand AB has now divided itself into two images. Which of these images should
ultimately lead to long-term sustenance and growth of the brand and, thus, helping in
the growth of the industry?
One of the images is that of a father figure, which is a reflection of his core brand
value of a Saviour. Brand AB here is a guide of the people leading them towards the
success, which he had achieved through lot of struggles. And people believe in this
brand because they had seen him succeed starting from a humble background. So
Brand AB symbolizes trust, esteem, respectfulness, and love for people all over
India. This Brand AB has been built through years and has a rock solid foundation.
This image of a father figure induces people to make him play roles he played in
films like Khakee, Black, etc., or turn towards the Brand AB whenever there is a
need to resurrect a bruised image, e.g., Cadbury after worm controversy, Dabur
Chyawanprash to counter flat sales growth, etc. This image of Brand AB gets a
19 | P a g e
boost when we speak of Amitabh Bachchan who has already got a Padma Shri
award. People believe, love and respect this image of Brand AB.
Another image of Brand AB, which is becoming prominent in the recent times, is that
of a brand which is acceptable to young generation. The role in 'Kabhi Alvida Naa
Kehna' or the advertisements in which he dances to the tunes of young generation
portrays this image. Now this image of Brand AB may be used due to different
reasons - it may be due to the threat it is feeling from other young brands, to make
itself acceptable to young generation, to stay relevant in recent times.
This is not the image of a father figure, guide to the people. This image makes the
Brand AB an evergreen brand, where in spite of being aged, he is still young at
heart; here Brand AB is more of a friend to the new generation.
But this image being a stark contrast to the actual image of Brand AB, there can be a
fear of diluting the core brand image or brand value - that of a guide of masses, a
saviour.
Importance of the Brand AB
"Brand Amitabh worth millions of rupees" - this was the heading of news when
Amitabh Bachchan got ill and had an intestinal surgery on November 30, 2005 at
Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai. In fact he was in the headlines of all papers and
television news. One of the main reasons for this, besides his popularity, is that his
illness had put the Bollywood film industry on a crisis. There is a huge commercial
side of the Brand Amitabh - Bollywood was not able to have a sigh of relief till he was
back in action, as a huge Rs. 270 crores was at stake. Brand Amitabh still sells like
hot-cakes in the Bollywood film industry. Chandan Mitra, an eminent journalist and
who also has been nominated to Rajya Sabha, has written an article on him with the
title, "The Only Real Indian Idol".
In 2005, he delivered one super hit (Bunty Aur Babli - Rs. 60 crores), two hits (Black
- Rs. 38 crores and Sarkar - Rs. 40 crores) and two semi-hits (Waqt and Viruddh).
Some of the other hits of Big B in 2005 have also done decent business in certain
quarters. The worth of Brand Amitabh cannot be valued only in terms of money - in
fact his popularity is considered more than any of the famous Khan brands like
20 | P a g e
Shahrukh, Salman and Aamir. To analyze the Brand Amitabh, trade analyst Taran
Adarsh has recalled the words of the late director Manmohan Desai: "Amitabh
Bachchan is like a Haley's Comet. A person like him comes once in 76 years. It is
only he who can survive in spite of all odds."
Rise of the Brand AB
On October 11, 1942, the well-known poet Harivansh Rai Bachchan and Teji
Bachchan He made his debut in 1969 with the film 'Saat Hindustani'. The film failed
at the box office. The fate was the same for his next few movies like 'Parwaana
(1971)', 'Reshma Aur Shera (1971)', 'Bansi Birju (1972)', 'Sanjog (1972)', 'Namak
Haram (1973)', 'Saudagar (1973)', etc.
But there was a small group of people who noticed his potential and became
unofficial brand managers of Brand Amitabh - which included legendary Indian film
makers like Prakash Mehra, Ramesh Sippy, Manmohan Desai and Yash Chopra,
and the screenplay writing duo Salim-Javed. In fact his first big hit came in 1973 with
Prakash Mehra-directed 'Zanjeer', written by Salim-Javed.
His tall and dark looks gave a new kind of action hero to the people. As it is said, a
brand can become popular only when it has contextual relevance. And the image of
"Angry Young Man" fighting against a corrupt society fitted exactly with the social
and political situation prevalent in the 70s. "
Values of the Brand AB
Brand AB represented a person who has been ill-treated / wronged by the social
system and fighting against the system to get justice. In fact a look at all the hit
movies of AB would show the same brand image. In the film 'Deewar (1975)', his
character turns a Mafia don and smuggler due to injustice done to him in his
childhood. In the films 'Trishul (1978)' and 'Laawaris (1981)' his characters were
abandoned by his father. In the film 'Shakti (1982)', his character is that of a son of a
strict police-officer who does not come to save his kidnapped son. So the brand
managers of AB, as mentioned above, used this theme of neglected by society and
fighting against it to churn out more hits like 'Sholay', 'Do Anjaane', 'Don', and
'Naseeb', etc.
21 | P a g e
So when we talk of this Brand AB, the core value based on which the brand was
created and became successful was that of a "Saviour" - he was a saviour of the
neglected masses, by making them fulfilling their aspirations of fighting against a
corrupt society. The other values of the brand - toughness, determination,
trustworthiness - were all in the outer crust of the brand.
Even when we speak of a human brand, the concept of A-R-C (Autonomy,
Relatedness and Competence) explains it perfectly. A brand is popular when it
applies to human motivation and that's what A-R-C theory explains.
Autonomy refers to a person's need to feel that his or her activities are self-chosen.
Associated with the fulfillment of this need is a person's perception that he or she is
free from any pressure and is able to express him or herself as he or she wishes.
Brand AB had that image of self-determination - for the first time it gave the people a
sense of freedom to make own choices and to protest against being oppressed by
the society, express their frustration against the corrupt society without being
pressurized. Relatedness refers to a person's need to feel a sense of closeness with
others - and people felt close to the sufferings of the Brand AB, the image of being
neglected by the society as they themselves were suffering from the same situation.
Competence is about the feelings of effectiveness and achievement in his or her
activities. People loved the success and achievement of Brand AB characters while
fighting against the corruption. They also wanted to do that and loved to see Brand
AB doing the same on-screen.
Fall of the Brand AB
As is the case of product brands, a human brand should also re-invent with time in
order to stay relevant with the changing social and political context, changing
mindset of the people. When we talk of photo-copying today, we say Xerox instead
of photo-copy. Similarly, Brand AB became so large that film-makers still made the
films with that particular brand image of Angry Young Man, instead of re-positioning
the brand. Main problem was social outlook of 80s had changed from that of gloom
to brightness; it had become an era of achievement and achievers. This was due to
the rise of a young Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi - it was an era of hope, life was more
organized, there was an all round development in the society. The image of Brand
22 | P a g e
AB as a person fighting against a corrupt society for social justice was totally out of
context.
Then being a close friend of Rajiv Gandhi, he joined politics. Because of his huge
popularity, he won easily from ancestral hometown of Allahabad in 1984. But in
politics, he could not get the guidance of any brand managers, as in case of his film
career. He left politics because of controversies; particularly after Rajiv and he were
implicated in the infamous "Bofors" case along with the U.K. based Hinduja Brothers.
Also the core value of Brand AB - a 'Saviour' of people - got damaged in the process,
as he could not be the same saviour of people in real life; on the other hand, his own
image got corrupted with 'Bofors' controversy. Instead of fighting against corruption,
the Brand AB itself became part of the corruption.
Another unsuccessful move was to institutionalize himself with Amitabh Bachchan
Corporation Limited (ABCL), hoping to extend the brand over wider areas. But this
effort also failed because it again tried to encash the old image of Brand AB instead
of adding some new value to the brand. It hosted the Miss World Pageant, in
Bangalore, the first of its kind ever in the history of India. The company then came
under debt running into crores of rupees. Some analysts reckon that ABCL lost over
Rs. 7 crores (Rs. 70 million) in organizing the ill-fated Miss World pageant.
ABCL also produced movies like Mani Ratnam's 'Bombay' and Shekhar Kapoor's
'Bandit Queen'. But most of the movies produced under the ABCL banner bombed at
the box office. Even his return to commercial cinema, with films like 'Mrityudata
(1997)', 'Lal Badshah (1999)' and 'Major Saab (1998)' flopped miserably. One off
movie like 'Bade Miyan Chhote Miyan (1998)' was hit mainly because of the
presence of younger co-star like Govinda.
Re-positioning the Brand AB - Rise Again
The Brand AB was recycled with the Indian version of the television show 'Who
Wants to Be a Millionaire' called "Kaun Banega Crorepati (KBC)". The show
presented the same Brand AB by re-positioning it. The core value of the brand was
still the same - he was a 'Saviour', previously he was the saviour of the neglected
masses; now he became saviour of people, helping them to achieve and win money.
23 | P a g e
The era of achievers cashed in with 'Achiever' attribute of the Brand AB. Brand AB is
an achiever brand in itself - he has achieved fame and has become a superstar,
starting from a mere struggler in the film industry. In KBC, he became a guide to the
people who wanted to be achievers in life by winning money.
KBC presented AB in classy suits and elegant ties or in traditional Indian attires. He
carried both personalities majestically in the show. He spoke brilliantly in both Hindi
and English. One of the reasons for this successful repositioning of the brand is
Amitabh Bachchan's mass appeal in the role as a classy host. His personality, acting
sense, bilingual efficiency (English and Hindi), and magnificent voice gave the
audiences a brilliant TV host.
During its peak time, the Brand AB was differentiated as relevant to the social,
economic and political context. When it lost out on this advantage, the film-makers'
hesitance to depart from the proven formula damaged the brand.
KBC repositioned the Brand AB from the angry young man fighting against corrupt
society, to that of an achiever who, having journeyed from being an unknown
common individual to most popular film star of Indian society, is willing to guide
people along the path of achievement. Film-makers' responded to this repositioned
Brand AB with films like 'Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham (2001)', 'Mohabbatein (2000)',
'Khakee (2004)', 'Black (2005)', etc.
Current Scenario - Threats
There are certain changes in today's society and cinema audiences. First of all,
when we talk of Hindi film market of today, there is a substantial rise of the NRI
market. Also there is a huge growth of multiplex audiences, as the number of
multiplexes in India is growing in an exponential manner. Also the audience is
younger. When we talk of the social context, it is the age of young achievers.
Especially due to the growth of software business, more and more young people are
becoming successful and rich at a younger age. These young achievers are also
relaxed and fun-loving in nature. So the brand of Indian film heroes which is
becoming more and more popular today is the Brand Rahul of 'Kuch Kuch Hota Hai
(1998)', or the Brand Nicki of 'Salaam Namaste (2005)' - young, fun-loving, relaxed
achievers. There are new age heroes who fit this brand image - Sharukh Khan,
24 | P a g e
Hrithik Roshan, Saif Ali Khan. They can connect to the young audiences more
spontaneously. All these factors can be a threat to the Brand AB.
Change Efforts & Conflicts of the Brand AB
Now the Brand AB is again trying to change, as it is trying to connect to younger
audience. First hint of this change came with the change in packaging of Brand AB in
KBC-2. Amitabh Bachchan appeared in leather jackets and open-necked shirts in
KBC-2; spoke Hinglish, the language of the modern generation. Even the
advertisements in which he appears tries to showcase the younger side of the brand
or the brands endorsed are having a young image in itself. The "Pappu Pass Ho
Gaya" ad of Cadbury, the other brands he endorsed like Pepsi, ICICI or Hajmola,
etc., point to this direction only. Also the character played by the Brand AB in the film
'Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (2006)' - "Sexy Sam" is a colorful but old flamboyant
character young at heart; who has aged in years but behaves like a young teenager
flirting with the females.
But while the Brand AB is trying to again reposition or re-reposition itself, there are
certain conflicts, which are becoming prominent. First of all, KBC-2 was not as
successful as its first part. Questions are being raised whether there is necessity to
go for this change. The brand endorsements of AB are also conflicting - on one side
the Brand AB is trying to associate itself with younger brands; on the other hand
certain brands like Parker Pens, Reid & Taylor, etc., that he endorses are more
related and matching to the actual brand image of Brand AB - that of esteem, trust
due to success over a number of years, one who is above the masses. Also this was
the reason the Brand AB was used for the polio endorsement of Government of
India.
The question also being raised is whether today's multiplex audiences go to see
movies like Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham, Mohabbatein, and Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna,
etc., for Brand AB or watch young actors like Shahrukh, Hrithik, Abhishek, etc. Also
another point with the Brand AB is the over-use of the brand, just like over-cooking a
food - this may lead to the loss in the mystique of Brand AB. However, AB justified
his huge amount of working to the reason of paying back his debt. He said in an
interview, "There was a sword hanging on my head all the time. I spent many
25 | P a g e
sleepless nights. One day, I got up early in the morning and went directly to Yash
Chopraji and told him that I was bankrupt. I had no films. My house and a small
property in New Delhi were attached. Yashji listened coolly, and then offered me a
role in his film 'Mohabattein', after he re-launched ABCL as AB Corp on his 61st
birthday in 2003. "I then started doing commercials, television and films. And I am
happy to say today that I have repaid my entire debt of Rs. 90 crores (Rs. 900
million) and am starting afresh," he added. But still today, after paying back all his
debts, Brand AB is doing the highest number of films and advertisements - the
question is whether this is being done in order to stay relevant to the target
audience, and if it is to see whether it will work? So all these discussions lead us to
the two brand images of AB, which was mentioned at the start.
Questionnaire:
1)Does anybody endorses brands better than Amitabh Bachan?
Does anybody endorses brands better than him?
26 | P a g e
2) Which brand does he endorse better?
27 | P a g e
3) How is PARKER as a brand?
28 | P a g e
4) How is CADBURY as a brand?
29 | P a g e
5) How is REID & TAYLOR as a brand?
30 | P a g e
31 | P a g e
6) How is BOROPLUS as a brand?
32 | P a g e
BIBLIOGRAPHY
http://www.labnol.org/
www.esomar.org
Brand Personality Enhancement- An Experimental Study of
Alternative Strategies – by: Natalia Maehle, Department of
Strategy and Management, Norway
Case Study: Amitabh Bachchan - Repositioning a Tomorrow's
Brand - by Shirshendu Ganguli *
33 | P a g e