View
215
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Alpha-particle-induced bystander effects between zebrafish embryos
in vivo E.H.W. Yum1, V.W.Y. Choi1, V.W.T. Li2, S.H. Cheng2, and K.N. Yu1
1Department of Physics and Materials Science,City University of Hong Kong
2Department of Chemistry and Biology,City University of Hong Kong
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Introduction
Objectives:
To study whether alpha-particles can induce in vivo bystander effects
Identifying the relationship between the alpha-particle absorbed dose and the bystander effect
Zebrafish embryos as the model
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Radiation-induced Bystander Effect
At cell level:Unirradiated cells respond as if they have been irradiated When contact with irradiated cellsOr in medium previously holding irradiated cells
Introduction
Yang, H., Asaad, N., Held, K.D., 2005. Medium-mediated intercellular communication is involved in bystander responses of X-ray- irradiated normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene. 24, 2096-2103
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
IntroductionBystander Effect
Responds as it has been irradiated
Ionizing radiation
Cell A Cell B
Yang, H., Asaad, N., Held, K.D., 2005. Medium-mediated intercellular communication is involved in bystander responses of X-ray- irradiated normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene. 24, 2096-2103
When they are put in contact or they share the same medium
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
IntroductionBystander effect in vivo are always questioned
Responds as it also receive radiation?????
Ionizing radiation
Mouse A Mouse B
Morgan, W.F., 2003. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effect in Vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiation research 159, 581-595.
Yes, there have been recent researches on bystander effect in vivo in mice and in fish
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Introduction Recent researches on bystander effects in vivo
0.5 Gy X-ray
Mothersill, C., Bucking, C., Smith, R.W., Agnihotri, N., O’Neill, A., Kilemade, M., Seymour, C.B., 2006. Communication of Radiation-induced Stress or Bystander Signals between Fish in Vivo. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 6859-6864.Mothersill, C., Smith, R.W., Agnihotri, N., Seymour, C.B., 2007. Characterization of a radiation-induced stress response communicated in vivo between zebrafish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 3382-3387.
This communication signals involved secretion of a chemical messenger into the water
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Introduction Zebrafish development stages:
http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/sgilber1/DB_lab/Fish/fish_stage.html
1.5 hours after fertilization
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
4 hours after fertilization
Embryo cell
Chorion
16 hours after fertilization
24 hours after fertilization
IntroductionWhy study alpha particles ?
An ionizing radiation with high linear energy transfer (LET)
Furthermore, alpha-particle emitters can be easily found in our environment.
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Introduction
α particles DNA damage Apoptosis
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Different in the number of apoptotic signals between control and irradiation experiment
DNA damage due to alpha-particle irradiation=
Introduction In this project:
Irradiation : 1.5 hours after fertilization No repair mechanism at this stage can magnify our
results for investigation
Apoptotic cell staining : 24 hours after fertilization Bladen’s group found it the best time to investigate
the no. of apoptotic cell after trying different time stages
Walker, C., Streisinger, G., 1983. Induction of mutations by gamma rays in pregonial germ cells of zebrafish embryos. Genetics. 103, 125-136
Bladen, C.L., Lam, W.K., Dynan, W.S., Kozlowski, D.J., 2005. DNA damage response and Ku80 function in the vertebrate embryo. Nucleic Acids Research 33, 3002-3010.
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Methodology
1. Dechorionation of zebrafish embryos
2. Alpha-particle irradiation
3. Bystander signal exposure
4. Apoptotic cell staining
5. Determining the absorbed dose
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Methodology Dechorionation of zebrafish embryos
Range of 5.5 MeV α-particles in water = 42 µm
The chorion will absorb all the alpha-particle energies
220um
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Methodology
Agarose Layer
Water
Zebrafish embryos with chorions
The chorions were removed by hands with forceps
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyAlpha-particle irradiation
Alpha particles
(passing through a large and variable thickness of fluid)
To control the incident alpha-particle energy
alpha particles should pass through the substrate which
was in contact with the embryo cells
water
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyAlpha-particle irradiation
fluid16 μm PADC film -particles
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyPADC films of 16 μm were used polyallyldiglycol-carbonate Repeating unit of PADC:
H2C O C
O
O CH2 CH2 O CH2 CH2 O C O
O
CH2
CH CH2 n
CHH2Cn
Most importantly:It is biocompatible and can record the number of alpha particles hitting the embryo cells
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Methodology
16 μm PADC films glued to holes
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
2mm diameter holes
Methodology
Agarose
Shallow regions
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyBystander effect exposure (Part 1) Aim to prove the existence of alpha-particle-induced bystander effects
Irradiated embryos
Agarose Layer (Unirradiated)
Naïve embryos
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Irradiation experiment
MethodologyBystander effect exposure (Part 1) Aim at proving the existence of alpha-particle-induced bystander effects
Unirradiated embryos
Agarose LayerControl Naïve embryos
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Control experiment
MethodologyBystander effect exposure (Part 2) Aim at identifying the relationship between the alpha-particle absorbed
dose and the bystander effect
Irradiated embryos
Agarose Layer Naïve
embryos
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Irradiation experiment
MethodologyBystander effect exposure (Part 2)
Agarose layer
Water
Irradiated zebrafish embryo
Naïve zebrafish embryos
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Methodology
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Irradiated Embryos
Naïve
Embryos
Control Embryos
Control Naïve Embryos
Sharing same medium
Sharing same medium
Irradiation experiment
Control experiment
MethodologyApoptotic cell staining:At 24 hours post fertilizationUsing acridine orangePhotos takingNo. of apoptotic cells were counted
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Methodology
Signal of apoptotic cell
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyDetermining the absorbed dose
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyDetermining the absorbed dose
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyDetermining the absorbed dose
Bottom layer of embryo cells
Cell area in contact with PADC film
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
MethodologyWhy counting? It is tedious and time consuming.
The size and shape of the cells varied significantlyThe contact area of the cell with the PADC film varied
significantly Impractical to estimate the no. of alpha-particles
striking the embryos cells using track density by assumed geometry
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Results and DiscussionPart 1 experiment
N =Average number of apoptotic cells
n = sample size
P = p values obtained
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Average no. of apoptotic cells:
naive > control naive
Results and DiscussionPart 1 experiment
N =Average number of apoptotic cells
n = sample size
P = p values obtained
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
The p values <0.05
Results and Discussion
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.00
50
100
150
200
250
300
A = 37.0±8.37 (p<0.00043)B = 28700±10700 (p<0.0015)
Ap
op
totic
Sig
na
l
Absorbed Dose (mGy)
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008
Part 2 experiment
y = A+Bx
ConclusionsOur results gave strong support to the existence of alpha-particle-induced bystander effects between zebrafish embryos in vivoA general positive correlation between the apoptotic signals in the naive embryos and the alpha-particle dose absorbed by the irradiated embryos. These supported the bystander factors involved chemical messengers secreted into the water medium.
24th International Conference on Nuclear Tracks in Solids
Bologna, 1-5 September 2008