Upload
roy
View
34
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Alpha and theta oscillations: Conscious control of information processing in the human brain?. Wolfgang Klimesch University of Salzburg Austria. May conference on ‚Consciousness, brain rhythms and the perception-action cycle‘ Memphis, May 3 rd – 4 th 2008. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Alpha and theta oscillations: Conscious control of information processing in the human brain?
Wolfgang KlimeschUniversity of Salzburg
Austria
May conference on ‚Consciousness, brain rhythms and the perception-action cycle‘
Memphis, May 3rd – 4th 2008
(1) Oscillations: Timing and spatial organization of information processes. Oscillations provide mechanisms that allow the emergence of spatially and temporally organized firing patterns in neural networks.
(2) Slow frequency oscillations: Conscious control of information processing. Slow frequency oscillations in the theta and alpha range (of about 4 – 13.5 Hz) are associated with the top-down control of two large processing systems, a working memory system and a a complex knowledge system, allowing semantic orientation in a constantly changing environment.
Theta and alpha oscillations exhibit a variety of different synchronization processes (e.g., amplitude increase, phase coupling, event-related phase reorganization) that reflect different types of control processes and different aspects of the timing of cognitive processes.
(3) Process binding and consciousness
(4) Conclusions
Oscillations and the control of information processing:Outline of the
structure of argumentation and proposed hypotheses
Part 1.1Timing of neuronal activity and information
processing
Inhi
biti
on
Min
imum
Max
imum
Time
Cell 2
Cell 1
Cell 3
Cell 1
Cell 2
Cell 3
Excitation
(Pyram
idal cells)M
aximum
Minim
um
Oscillations reflect rhythmic fluctuations of the membrane potential (of the dendritic tree and soma).
They have a strong influence on the timing of neural firing.The influence of oscillations depends on the excitatory level of
affected cells and on the magnitude of their amplitudes.
Basics: Inhibition, Excitation and Timing
Large amplitudes tend to entrain many neurons
Inhi
biti
on
Min
imum
Max
imum
Time
Cell 2
Cell 1
Cell 3
Cell 1
Cell 2
Cell 3
Excitation
(Pyram
idal cells)M
aximum
Minim
um
Basics: Inhibition, Amplitude and Timing
Example 1: Alpha-like oscillations control the timing of sensory coding
Nicolelis & Fanselow, (2002). Thalamcortical optimization of tactile processing according to behavioural state. Nature Neurosci. 5 (6), 517-523.
Whi
sker
mov
emen
t
a) Top-down control of sensory encoding during exploratory behavior
b)
b)
c)
c)
Individual alpha frequency (IAF) varies to a large degree between subjects (in a range of about 7.5 and 13.5 Hz) and is related to the speed of information processing. This have been shown very early in EEG research: e.g., Surwillo, W. (1961). Frequency of the alpha rhythm, reaction time and age, Nature 191, 823-824. Klimesch, W. (1996). Alpha frequency, reaction time and the speed of processing information, J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 13, 511-518.
Example 2: Alpha oscillations and the timing of information processing
Hz
Th
eta
Low
er-1
Low
er-2
Up
per
4 6 8 10 12
Hz4 6 8 10 12
Hz4 6 8 10 12
IAF
B) Subject with slow alpha at 7.5 Hz
A) Average alpha frequency in a large sample of subjects is at about 10 Hz
C) Subject with fast alpha at 13.5 Hz
Range of variation
Pow
er/A
mpl
itud
eP
ower
/Am
plit
ude
Pow
er/A
mpl
itud
e
Interindividual differences in alpha frequency vary with age and memory performance. (A) From early childhood to puberty, alpha frequency increases from about 5.5 to more than 10 Hz but then starts to decrease with age. (B) As compared to bad memory performers, good performers have a significantly higher alpha frequency, even in Alzheimer demented subjects.
Hz
10
5+
++
+
+
A) B)
Age (years)
Alzheimer(65 years)
Young Adults (25 Years)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 15 20 30 40 50 60 70
Hz
10
5
Age (A) and performance related (B) differences in IAF
IAF increases and declines with age just as processing speed, cognitive performance and brain volume does
Goo
d m
emor
y pe
rfor
mer
s
Goo
d m
emor
y pe
rfor
mer
s
Bad
mem
ory
perf
orm
ers
Bad
mem
ory
perf
orm
ers
Example 2: Alpha oscillations and the timing of information processing
Part 1.2Oscillations and the spatio-temporal organisation
of information processing
First half retention interval
Second half retention interval
Manipulation Retention
Upper alpha phase coherence: leading and trailing sites
Sauseng, P., Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Pecherstorfer, T., Freunberger, R., Hanslmayr, S., (2005). EEG alpha synchronization and functional coupling during top-down processing in a working memory task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 26, 148-155.
Part 2 Slow frequency oscillations: Conscious control
of information processing. The functional meaning of theta and alpha
(i) A brief phasic event-related increase in theta power probably reflects encoding/retrieval of new (episodic) information.
(ii) A long lasting event-related increase probably reflects top-down control associated with central executive functions. Examples:- The maintenance of information in WM- Spatial navigation (exploratory behavior)- Sustained attention
Part 2.1 ThetaTheta appears to be related to different functions of a complex working memory (WM) system. At least two types of task-related responses can be distinguished :
E
RD
%
E
RS
%50
0
5
0
100
-1000 -500 0 500 1000 ms
Picture encoding (hits, dotted) and recognition (hits, bold; correct rejections dashed ). O1; IAF = 10.3
E
RD
%
E
RS
%50
0
5
0
100A) Theta; 4.3-6.3Hz B) Lower-1 alpha; 6.3-8.3 Hz
E
RD
%
E
RS
%50
0
5
0
100
E
RD
%
E
RS
%50
0
5
0
100C) Lower-2 alpha; 8.3-10.3 Hz D) Upper alpha; 10.3-12.3 Hz
Theta old/new - effect
Evoked theta; recogn. hits
Evoked lower-2 alpha; recogn. hits
Evoked lower-1 alpha; recogn. hits
Evoked upper alpha; recogn. hits
-1000 -500 0 500 1000 ms
-1000 -500 0 500 1000 ms -1000 -500 0 500 1000 ms
Frequency specificity and functional meaning of theta for episodic encoding. Klimesch et al (2001). Episodic retrieval is reflected by a process specific increase in human theta activity. Neuroscience Letters, 302, 49-52.
The neural correlates of conscious awareness during successful retrieval are reflected by a late event-related synchronization (ERS) in theta.
An early EEG synchronization in the theta band predicted knowing, and a later remembering. Moreover, early and late event-related potentials were also found to predict knowing and remembering, respectively.
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
Remember
Know
125 250 375 500 625 750 875
New
ERP‘s, recording site Pz
Increase in theta, recording site Pz
Remember
Know
New
µV
ER
BP
in z
-val
ues
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
Remember
Know
125 250 375 500 625 750 875
New
ERP‘s, recording site Pz
Increase in theta, recording site Pz
Remember
Know
New
µV
ER
BP
in z
-val
ues
The
ta E
RS
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
extCP1
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
extCP1
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
extCP1
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5-250 -125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5-250 -125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5-250 -125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875
Know
New
a)
b)
c)
-2µV+
-1µV+
ERP
Theta
ERP
Theta
ERP
Theta
CP1
-125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875 1000
-125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875 1000
-125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875 1000
CP1
CP1
Remember
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
extCP1
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
extCP1
-6,00
-4,00
-2,00
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
extCP1
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5-250 -125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5-250 -125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5-250 -125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875
Know
New
a)
b)
c)
-2µV+
-1µV+
ERP
Theta
ERP
Theta
ERP
Theta
CP1
-125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875 1000
-125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875 1000
-125 0 125 250 375 500 625 750 875 1000
CP1
CP1
Remember
Evoked theta
Evoked theta
Evoked theta
Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Yonelinas, A., Kroll, N.E.A., Lazzara, M., Roehm, D., & Gruber, W. (2001). Theta synchronization during episodic retrieval: neural correlates of conscious awareness. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 33-38.
75 words are presented, 45 items are repeated (old),
30 not repeated (new)Yes/no recognition and confidence judgment.
Stimulus onset every 3.5 sec
30 items 45 itemsnot repeated repeated (new words) (old words)
15 itemsLag 1656 sec
25 itemsLag 828 sec
15 itemsLag 27 sec
Retrieval from Retrieval from WM intermediate memory
Block 1 Block 2…………….. Block 8
Continous Word Recognition Paradigm
A decaying episodic trace is associated with decreased theta Klimesch, W., Hanslmayr, S., Sauseng, P., Gruber, W., Brozinski, C., Kroll, N.E.A., Yonelinas, A., & Doppelmayr, M. (2006c). Oscillatory EEG correlates of episodic memory trace decay. Cerebral Cortex, 16 (2), 280-290.
ms-200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0
µV 0.0
-2.5
-5.0
2.5
5.0
ms-200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0
µV 0.0
-2.5
-5.0
2.5
5.0
Po3 Pz
1st presentationLag 16Lag 8Lag 2
ms-200.0 -100.0 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 600.0 700.0 800.0
µV 0.0
-2.5
-5.0
2.5
5.0
O1
P3P2
N2
N1
P1
= 0
.5 [H
z]
ERP 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0
5
10
15
20
2
0
Signal21T5ERD & Signal23T5ERD
ERP 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
2
0
ERP 1 - ERP 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
1
-1
ERP 2 - ERP 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
1
-1
= 0
.5 [H
z]
ERD 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0
5
10
15
20
40
-40
ERD 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
40
-40
ERD 1 - ERD 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
15
-15
ERD 2 - ERD 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
15
-15
= 0
.5 [H
z]All 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0
5
10
15
20
6
0
All 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
6
0
All 1 - All 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0.5
-0.5
All 2 - All 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0.5
-0.5
= 0
.5 [H
z]
PLI 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0
5
10
15
20
0.5
0
PLI 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0.5
0
PLI 1 - PLI 2
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0.15
-0.15
PLI 2 - PLI 1
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0.15
-0.15
Evozierte Power Lag2 Evozierte Power Lag16
ERD Lag2 ERD Lag16
Whole power Lag2 Whole Power Lag16
PLI Lag2 PLI Lag16Diff
eren
zmap
s fü
r E
letr
ode
T5
Evoked Theta
Theta ERS
Alpha ERD
Theta Phase Locking
Lag effect: Theta, T5
% E
RS
p1(-400 - -200)
p2(-200 – 0)
t1(0 – 200)
t2(200 – 400)
t3(400 – 600)
t4(600 – 800)
p1(-400 - -200)
p2(-200 – 0)
t1(0 – 200)
t2(200 – 400)
t3(400 – 600)
t4(600 – 800)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
% E
RS
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
p1(-400 - -200)
p2(-200 – 0)
t1(0 – 200)
t2(200 – 400)
t3(400 – 600)
t4(600 – 800)
p1(-400 - -200)
p2(-200 – 0)
t1(0 – 200)
t2(200 – 400)
t3(400 – 600)
t4(600 – 800)
lag-2lag-8lag-16
lag-2lag-8lag-16
lag-2lag-8lag-16
lag-2lag-8lag-16
Prestimulusintervals p1, p2
Poststimulusintervals, t1 – t4
Prestimulusintervals p1, p2
Poststimulusintervals, t1 – t4
Prestimulusintervals p1, p2
Poststimulusintervals, t1 – t4
Prestimulusintervals p1, p2
Poststimulusintervals, t1 – t4
Lag effect: Theta, mean over all electrodes
Evoked theta in P2 time window (around 300 ms)
Low resolution electromagnetic tomography LORETA (Pascual-Marqui et al., 1994)
LORETA (Pascual-Marqui et al., 1994).
The P3 component elicited stronger activity for Lag-2 than Lag-16 in left superior temporal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus, posterior cingulated gyrus, bilateral lingual gyrus, and, most interesting, in right hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus (t > 3.77, p < .05 corrected). There were no significant differences between lag-2 and lag-8, nor between lag-8 and lag-16.
LO
RE
TA
; P3
unfi
lter
ed
WM comprises an anterior-posterior network
Attentional Control/Central executive Phonological loopprimarily located in left hemisphere, including- articulatory rehearsal system (BA 44)- temporary STORAGE system (BA 40): ‚Verbal-acoustic‘ STM‘
Visuospatial sketchpad primarily located in right hemisphere, including- frontal areas (BA 6, 47) and- posterior areas (BA, 19, 40): ‚visual STM‘
From Sarnthein, Petsche, Rappelsberger, Shaw &Von Stein (1998). Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. PNAS, 95, 7092-7096.
Enhanced coherence in the theta range (4-7 Hz) during retention. Connections between electrode sites represent significant increases of coherence above control (P< 0.05 or better). The shaded areas indicate the range of positions of individual electrodes as determined in an MRI study. Note that the occipital electrodes (01, 02) are placed not over primary visual areas, but closer to the parieto-temporo-occipital association region. (a) During retention of character strings in memory, enhanced coherence appeared between prefrontal and posterior cortex. In posterior cortex, the left hemisphere was predominantly involved. (b) coherence- increases during retention of abstract line drawings in memory. Patterns of encanced coherence were similar n both tasks, but more connections appeared in the right hemisphere in the visual task. For convergent evidence see Weiss & Rappelsberger (2000)
A) character strings B) line drawings
Functional interplay in theta frequency between prefrontal and posterior regions
Is the ‘interplay’ between anterior and posterior regions due to executive functions operating on storage areas?
Study by Sauseng, Klimesch, Gruber, Doppelmayr, Stadler, W., & Schabus (2002)
Issue of interest: Retrieval processes from LTM (or intermediate memory) activated from WM.
Design: Three tasks were performed, a learning, ‘recognition’ and selective retrieval task. First, subjects had to learn a verbal label (numbers between 1-8) for each of a set of 8 abstract pictures. Second, the pictures were presented and subjects had to name the label. Third, in the selective retrieval task, two labels were presented sequentially. Now in response to each label, the respective picture had to be retrieved. To guarantee that subjects are actually retrieving the corresponding pictures they had to perform an imagery task after the presentation of the second label.
Label 1 Label 2
Retrievepicture 1
Retrievepicture 2 and perform imagery task
x = positive maximumo = negative maximum
Theta -ERP mapsubject “M“
ms
400
500
600
700
800
x x x x x x
xx x x x x
x x
x xx x
x x x xx x
o o o
o oo o
oo o o o o
o o o
o
o
o o o o oo o
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
occipital to frontal
o
+0.8
0
-0.8
µV
+1.8
0
-1.8
µV
frontal to occipital
change in direction of theta marked by vertical line
Evoked theta behaves like a travelling wave. After a label is presented several cycles of theta can be observed travelling from frontal to occipital sites. At about 774 ms (on average) the direction reverses. This ‚latency‘ is correlated with memory performance (number of correct labels in recognition task): r = .39 p < .05.
ms poststim500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
µV 0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
0.5
1.0
1.5
Fz
Cz
Pz
Oz
Theta-waves single subject “B“
A
pop -1 p+1
change in direction
Example of an evoked, ‘traveling’ theta wave, one subject, negative polarity is in blue
150
175
200
225
250
p-2 p-1 p+1 p+2po
FzOzms
250
225
200
175
150
Significant increase in frontal theta period during p0
*
At time of change in direction frontal theta period increases
Upper Alpha Desynchronization (ERBP) over occipital sites as a function of theta reversal
-0,4
0
0,4
z-valu
es
Stimulus triggered Triggered by theta
Triggered by theta
400 ms
Part 2.2 Alpha
Part 2.2.1 The key for the functional understanding of alpha: The onset of
Alpha ERD reflects retrieval from memory
Episodic processing mode:A phasic process concentrated
on a specific event
Semantic processing mode: A continuous, automatic
process
In a conventional, event-related memory task episodic and semantic memory proccesses are required
Post-StimulusPre-Stimulus
Mem
ory item
Do not initiate encoding in WMS
Control encoding into WMS
Prepare for encoding:
Post-StimulusPre-Stimulus
Block access to LTMS
Mem
ory item
Control access to LTMS
Prepare for retrieval:
Time
The
ta
Am
plit
ude
TimeA
lpha
A
mpl
itud
e
ERSERD
Part 2.2.1 The functional dissociation between theta
and alpha
The behaviour of alpha is puzzling and remarkable in several ways: (i) Whereas other frequencies reliably show an increase in power (event-related synchronization, ERS) in response to a stimulus/event, alpha shows a decrease (event-related desynchronization, ERD) in many tasks. (ii) More recently, it became clear that certain types of tasks reliably elicit alpha ERS.
We have suggested recently that the key for understanding alpha is the fact that the onset of upper alpha ERD indicates the onset of access to and retrieval of a trace from LTM (Klimesch et al. 2007).
Sample: 22 right handed volunteers (8 males, mean age = 22.88; SD = 3.34; 14 females, mean age = 23.79; SD = 4.41). Each subject had to perform first the reading and then the semantic task.
READING TASK: Subjects were instructed to silently read and to pronounce the sentence right after a question mark would appear.
SEMANTIC TASK: Subjects were instructed to read the sentence in order to search a super-ordinate concept for the noun of the third chunk and to pronounce the super-ordinate concept after the question mark appeared.
First chunk:subject
‚Ein Hase‘,A rabbit
Second chunk:finite verb and a
reflexive pronoun ,hat sich‘
‚is‘
Third chunk:object
‚in der Schachtel‘‚in the box‘
Fourth chunk:verb
,versteckt‘‚hiding‘
?
800 ms 800 ms 800 ms 800 ms
Evidence for hypothesis that semantic memory is related to upper alpha ERD
From: Röhm, D., Klimesch, W., Haider, H., Doppelmayr, M. (2001). The role of theta and alpha oscillations for language comprehension in the human electroencephalogramm. Neuroscience Letters, 310, 137-140.
Experimental design:
1.1
0.8
0.5
0.2
0z-values
Thetareading task semantic task
Upper alphareading task semantic task
*** reading > semantic
1.1 1.2
2.1
3.1
4.1
2.2
3.2
4.2
1.1 1.2
2.1
3.1
4.1
2.2
3.2
4.2
n.s
n.s
n.s
* reading < semantic
** reading < semantic
** reading < semantic
*** reading < semantic
3rd chunkretrieval of super-ordinateconcept insemantictask
Evidence for hypothesis that semantic memory is related to upper alpha ERDSignificant increase in upper alpha ERD during retrieval from semantic long-term memory and semantic processing - although sentences were already presented in
the preceding reading task.
1. chunk
2. chunk
3. chunk
4. chunk
Theta ERS and Upper Alpha ERD scaled in red
Part 2.2.2 Alpha and Perception No ERD but phase locking during ‘re-activation
of a trace’
Experimental design:
Example of a trial. The subjects were instructed to respond as fast as possible to two target stimuli (p, q) by pressing one of four buttons.
Hanslmayr, S., Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., Gruber, W., Doppelmayr, M., Freunberger, R., Pecherstorfer, T., 2005. Visual discrimination performance is related to decreased alpha amplitude but increased phase locking. Neurosci. Lett. 375, 64-68. For similar findins see: T. Ergenoglu, T. Demiralp, Z. Bayraktaroglu, M. Ergen, H. Beydagi, Y. Uresin, Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans, Cognitive Brain Res. 20 (2004) 376-383. These findings were replicated in Hanslmayr et al. (2007).
Mean reaction time ~ 500 ms
0.5
1
1.5
Power bad
-0.5 0 0.5
5
10
15
20
PLI good
-0.5 0 0.5
5
10
15
20
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
PLI bad
-0.5 0 0.5
5
10
15
20
Power good
-0.5 0 0.5
5
10
15
20
Good perception performers Bad perception performers
No upper alpha ERD in perception taskAre good and bad performers using different strategies of top-down control?
Period of 100 ms = 10 Hz
Large alpha phase-locking is associated with a large P1 and N1 component in the EEG
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pre
stim
ulus
Mag
nitu
de(µ
v)P
rest
imul
usM
agn
itude
(µv)
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pre
stim
ulus
Mag
nitu
de(µ
v)P
rest
imul
usM
agn
itude
(µv)
Memory task
2 6 10 14 18 Hz
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pre
stim
ulus
Mag
nitu
de(µ
v)P
rest
imul
usM
agn
itude
(µv)
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
2 6 10 14 18
Frequency (Hz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pre
stim
ulus
Mag
nitu
de(µ
v)P
rest
imul
usM
agn
itude
(µv)
Perception task
2 6 10 14 18 Hz
Recording site: Pz
Prestimulus alpha synchronization
cf Hanslmayr et al. 2006, 207)
Prestimulus alpha synchronization may reflect different strategies of top-down control that lead to differences in performance
Perceivers (P+) : Group of subjects (n = 15) with a performance that lies significantly above chance (25%). Mean detection rate: 58%
Non-Perceivers (P-) : Group of subjects (n = 15) with a performance that is not significantly different from chance. Mean detection rate: 26 %
Correlation between alpha power (8 – 12 Hz) and detection performance. Both scales are transformed to ranks.
prestimulus power (- 500 to 0 ms)
c) For the group of Perceivers (P+), the ongoing prestimulus EEG (- 500 to 0 ms) shows larger phase coupling in trials when subjects failed to perceive the stimulus. d) topography of electrode pairs with larger phase coupling for incorrect as compared to correct responses. e) Number of couplings for each electrode.
Resting condition, eyes open
Part 2.2.3 Alpha ERS reflects control of search area/ blocking of retrieval
Upper Alpha, Temporal sites, Hits
30
0
30
60
ER
D%
E
RS
%
1000 ms
Memory SetWarningsignal Probe
Load 10, varied
Load 5, consistent
ENCODING RETENTION RETRIEVALCognitive processes:
Task sequence:
Upper alpha exhibits a load dependent increase in ERS during encoding and retention in memory scanning tasks (Klimesch et al., 1999; Jensen et al.,
2002; Schack & Klimesch, 2002; Busch & Herrmann, 2003; Cooper et al., 2003; Herrmann et al., 2004a; Sauseng et al., 2005b)
Encoding, Load 10 varied
Reference
Retention, set size 4
Retention, set size 2
Pz
A
bsol
ute
Pow
er5
10
15
20
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Hz
Pz
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Hz
A
bsol
ute
Pow
er5
10
15
20
InterpretationAlpha synchronization reflects inhibitory top-down control to
block retrieval of interfering information When the stored memory trace has to be retrieved, however, a
strong ERD can be observed.
In a memory scanning task, a subject is in an encoding and retrieval mode.
Trial k B 2 H 5 4 L K R 1 F H?
Trial k + 1: 3 1 L 4 8 6 R K C 8 F?
Suppression of retrieval of items from previous trialshelps to reduce interference
The separately performed TMS experiment revealed that the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) at the hand was reduced during INH as compared to ACT and a baseline condition.
Further Evidence comes from findings about motor behavior and the mu.rhythm:In a study by Hummel et al. (2002) subjects had - in response to visual cues - to perform sequential finger movements on an electrical keybord. The task was either to actually perform the movements (ACT condition) or to
look at the cues but to inhibit a response (INH condition). Upper alpha ERD was observed during ACT but ERS during INH
Part 2.2.4 Alpha phase and top-down control
Memory set500ms
Retention Interval 2500ms
Probe & ResponseMatch or no match?
Ret
enti
onM
anip
ulat
ion
pure retention
retention + manipulation (rotation around vertical midline)
2 analysing intervals(0 – 1000 ms and 1000 - 2000 ms after
memory item offset)
Sauseng, P., Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr M., Pecherstorfer, T., Freunberger, R., Hanslmayr, S. (2005). EEG alpha synchronization and functional coupling during top-down processing in a working memory task. Human Brain Mapping, in press.
Visuo-spatial working memory task
First half retention interval Second half retention interval
Upper Alpha between 9.8 and 12.7 Hz
First half retention interval
Second half retention interval
Manipulation Retention
Upper alpha coherence: leading and trailing sites
Part 3: Process binding and consciousness
Event-related phase reorganization (ERPR)and between frequency phase coupling
may reflect binding of different processes that are controlled by consciousness
ms-500 0 500
ms-500 0 500
ms-500 0 500ms
Hz
-1000 -500 0 500
5
10
15
20
ms
Hz
-1000 -500 0 500
5
10
15
20
ms
Hz
-1000 -500 0 500
5
10
15
20
Who
le P
ower
Evo
ked
Pow
erPL
I
F7, set size 4 O2, set size 4
loga
rith
mic
sca
le f
or p
ower
PL
I
Upper Alpha Sync.during retention
6 Hz
12 Hz
6 Hz
12 Hz
Theta : upper alpha phase coupling in a Sternberg task (load 2 and load 4); Schack, Klimesch & Sauseng (2005). Internat. Journal of Psychophysiology, in press.
theta: s4-s2 11.719 ms 23.438 ms 35.156 ms 46.875 ms 58.594 ms 70.312 ms 82.031 ms 93.75 ms
105.469 ms 117.188 ms 128.906 ms 140.625 ms 152.344 ms 164.062 ms 175.781 ms 187.5 ms 199.219 ms
210.938 ms 222.656 ms 234.375 ms 246.094 ms 257.812 ms 269.531 ms 281.25 ms 292.969 ms 304.688 ms
316.406 ms 328.125 ms 339.844 ms 351.562 ms 363.281 ms 375 ms 386.719 ms 398.438 ms 410.156 ms
421.875 ms 433.594 ms 445.312 ms 457.031 ms 468.75 ms 480.469 ms
Difference of phase-locking index at 6 Hz: load 4 – load 2
permutation test (1000 perm.) for PLI at F7 (0-400 ms): tsum=0.038
no univariate differences
0 ms 11.719 ms 23.438 ms 35.156 ms 46.875 ms 58.594 ms 70.312 ms 82.031 ms 93.75 ms
105.469 ms 117.188 ms 128.906 ms 140.625 ms 152.344 ms 164.062 ms 175.781 ms 187.5 ms 199.219 ms
210.938 ms 222.656 ms 234.375 ms 246.094 ms 257.812 ms 269.531 ms 281.25 ms 292.969 ms 304.688 ms
316.406 ms 328.125 ms 339.844 ms 351.562 ms 363.281 ms 375 ms 386.719 ms 398.438 ms 410.156 ms
421.875 ms 433.594 ms 445.312 ms 457.031 ms 468.75 ms 480.469 ms
permutation test (1000 perm.) for PLI at O2 (100-500 ms): tsum=0.022;
No univariate sign. diff.: 200-500 ms
Difference of phase-locking index at 12 Hz: load 4 – load 2
m:n phase synchronization; F7 / O2
ERP‘s Sternberg yes response, load 2 (blue) and load 4 (red)
-2
0
2
4
6 µ
V
85 ms11.8 Hz
250 500 ms 170 ms 5.9 Hz
RT, load 2400 ms
RT, load 4524 ms
P3
-4
-
2
0
2
4
µV
250 500 msF7
O2
ERP‘s generated (in part) bynested theta and upper alpha.
Phase reversal between left frontaland right posterior sites.
F7 dominated by theta
O2 dominated by upper alphaand theta
Significant theta and upper alpha PLI and significant phase coupling suggest nested oscillations as illustrated below.
P1 N1 P1 N1
Phase locking index
Evoked Power
Event-related Potential
O2M+ M-
PLI
Gabor wavelet estimate (µV)
0 0.6
20
5
10
5
10
Hz
Hz
-10
0
10
µV
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1Time (sec)
0
5
10
15
20
Freq
uenc
y (H
z)
Stimulus
Good memory performers (M+) show a significantly larger phase locking in the N1 time window as compared to bad performers (M-)
A) Alpha: 10 Hz Sinus
0 50 100 150 200
-
+P1 at 100 ms
N1 at 150 ms
Resetting at 25 ms
B) Theta:, 6 Hz Sinus-
+
N1 at 150 ms
Resetting at 24.9 ms
24.9 66.6 108.3 ms
P1
0 50 100 150 200
Period = 166.7 ms,
0 50 100 150 200
C) Phase alignment at N1
N1 at 150 ms
D) Superposition
0 50 100 150 200
P1 latency is 86 ms
N1 at 150 ms
Interpeak latency is 150-86 = 64ms 7.8 Hz
The basic properties of the P1-N1 complex can be described by a superposition of an evoked theta and alpha wave
Part 3.1 Instantaneous Phase Alignment (IPA)
between frequencies generates event-related potentials (ERP‘s)
Picture encoding and retrieval task. Data and methods from: Gruber,W., Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P. & Doppelmayr M. (2004). Alpha phase synchronization predicts P1 peak latency and amplitude size. Cerebral Cortex, in press.
N1
P1
Time [ms]
Vol
tage
[µ
V]
Event-related potentiala
c
-500 -250 0 250 500 750 1000
0
-10
-20
10
20
Time [ms]
Fre
quen
cy [
Hz]
Gab
or e
stim
ates
max
min
Evoked powerb
d
-500 -250 0 250 500 750 1000
5
10
15
20
Time [ms]
Fre
quen
cy [
Hz]
Whole power
-500 -250 0 250 500 750 1000
5
10
15
20
Time [ms]
Fre
quen
cy [
Hz]
Significant PLI (α = 10 %)
-500 -250 0 250 500 750 1000
5
10
15
20
Sig
n. P
LI
min
max
n.s. Gab
or
esti
mat
es
max
min
Recording site O1, example for one subject
Fre
quen
cy [
Hz]
P1 N1
Phase angle; pos. peak, neg. peak
(1) Test for circular unimodal distribution of the phase angle (Hodges-Ajne test)
(2) For selected frequencies at each time point the mean phase angle was determined.
Steps for determining a significant phase alignment between frequencies (for each time point and frequency bin):
(3) By using confidence intervals it was tested whether the phase angle of each selected frequency bin deviates significantly from mean phase angle.(4) From all selected cases only those with a significant increase in PLI were considered.
Phase alignment between frequencies, example for one subject (data from Gruber et al. 2004)
e
h Phase alignment and ERP over all subjects
Circular histogram of phase angle at P1 / N1
counts0 1
P1
N10°
90°
180°
270°
30°
60°120°
150°
210°
240°300°
330°
g
Time [ms]
Fre
quen
cy [
Hz]
pos. peak (360°)
neg. peak (180°)
po
s. g
oin
g n
eg. g
oin
g
pos. goingneg. going
Sign. phase alignment
ER
P [µ
V]
-20
+20
5
10
15
20
40 80 120 160 200 240
f
pos. peak (0°)
Timet1 t2 t3
Prestimulus Stimulus Poststimuus
Theta
UpperAlpha
Phase reset
Phase reset Co-activation of both networks:
Information exchange?
Part 3.2 The P1 may reflect alpha-ERPR
Hypothesis: The P1 is the earliest manifestation of a top-down process during early sensory processing in sensory-semantic long-term memory which is functionally associated with alpha activity. The general idea is that under conditions where sensory processing is guided by a specific expectancy e.g., about the spatial location and/or type of stimulus, the P1 amplitude will be larger than under conditions where specific expectancies are lacking.
For a Review see: Klimesch, Sauseng & Hanslmayr (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition/timing hypothesis. Brain Research reviews.
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
[µV]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 [ms]
O2 GA-ERP-L1 GA-ERP-L2 GA-ERP-L3 GA-ERP-L4
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
[µV]
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 [ms]
Oz GA-ERP-L1 GA-ERP-L2 GA-ERP-L3 GA-ERP-L4
Degraded picture recognition task; Data analysis in progress
Example 1:The P1 is not a sensnory component.
It is missing if expectancy/early categorization is missing
Recording site Oz Recording site O2
Completely degraded picture
Not degraded picture
P1 appears graduelly as expectancy becomes more specific
The circle represents the ‚stimulus space‘ ~ All possible stimuli that may appear in a particular task/condition.
If the P1 is generated by evoked alpha, the P1 should reflect inhibition as alpha does
Highly specifc expectancy Specifc expectancy Vague expectancy
The P1 may be related to the inhibition of access to irrelevant stimuli
inhibition inhibition inhibition
Picture categorization task: Objects vs. Scrambled objects
Example 2:The P1 may reflect top-down induced inhibition
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
16
[µV]
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 [ms]
Oz OBJ-ERP SCR-ERP
P1
N1
ERP at Oz
The average median for the response times for objects was 490.1 ms (SD=0.65 ms) and 506.1 ms for scrambled objects. Difference is not significant.
Objects
ScrambledObjects
Larger evoked alpha for scrambled objects in time window of P1
..
......
..
......
..
..
Cue: Arrow, 34 ms; Random SOA (600-800 ms); Target 50 ms
The cue indicates the most likely side (p = .75; valid trials).
Spatial Cue Paradigm after Posner
Hemifield presentation of two targets (short and long bar)
..
......
..
......
..
..
Cue: Arrow, 34 ms; Random SOA (600-800 ms); Target 50 ms
VALID Trial, Example:
INVALID Trial, Example:
Po3 Target Valid
Ipsi = Target is expected and processed ‘at’ PO4
Contra = Target is expected and processed ‘at’ PO3
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
[µV]
-1.4 -1.3 -1.2 -1.1 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 [s]
-
+
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
[µV]
-1.4 -1.3 -1.2 -1.1 -1.0 -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 [s]
-
+
Po3 Target Invalid
Ipsi = Target is expected ‘at’ PO3 but processed ‘at’ PO4
Contra = Target is expected ‘at’ PO4 but processed ‘at’ PO3
Po3 Target VALID
Po3 Target INVALID
Ipsi = Target is expected and processed ‘at’ PO4
Contra = Target is expected and processed ‘at’ PO3
Ipsi = Target expected ‘at’ PO3 but processed ‘at’ PO4
Contra = Target expected ‘at’ PO4 but processed ‘at’ PO3
100 ms
Time course of changes in upper alpha power
Example 3:The P1 behaves like a traveling, evoked alpha wave.
Table 1P1 and N1 latencies in ms
ComponentPz P3 P4 PO3 PO4 P7 P8 O1 O2
P1 138 128 132 120 122 116 108 113 112
N1 183 170 175 166 163 162 159 162 163
Difference 45 42 43 46 41 46 51 49 51
0
9
-9
-500 0 500 1000
0
PzO1
0
9
-9
-500 0 500 1000
0
PzO1
Stroop task; Klimesch et al 2007The task is to respond only to ink color but to ignore the meaning of the presented words
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
PO3-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
P8-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
O1
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
PO4
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
P4-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
Pz
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
P7-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
P3
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
[µV]
-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 [ms]
P1 O1 P1 Pz
0 - 16 ms 17 - 33 ms 33 - 49 ms
50 - 66 ms 67 - 83 ms 84 - 100 ms
100 - 116 ms 117 - 133 ms 134 - 150 ms
151 - 167 ms 167 - 183 ms 184 - 200 ms
-1.0 µV 1.0 µV0 µV
Filtered ERP (7 to 10 Hz)
Topography of filtered ERP
C D
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
3
-1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 ms
Hzm
/sMean Travel Speed (m/s)
-800 -400 0 400 800 ms0
0.2
Correlation of Single Trial Phase-differences with P1 Latency
B C
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
200
0.2
Correlation of Single Trial Phase-differences with N1 Latency
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
-800 -400 0 400 800 ms
Hz Hz
Part 4: Conclusions
4. 1. ThetaFor theta the interpretation appears straight forward: This oscillation appears functionally related to processes in a complex WM-system that operates under direct conscious (top-down) control
4.2 Alpha Synchronized (upper) alpha reflects control processes in a complex long-term memory (LTM, or ‘knowledge system’) system that may either operate under top-down control or may be running automatically in a default-like mode. An important function of these control processes is to keep us semantically oriented in our environment with respect to its meaning, location and time.
The reactivity, topography and functional meaning of alpha is similar to that of posterior parts of a default mode network as proposed by Gusnard & Raichle (2001). Raichle and colleagues assume that activity in the posterior cingulate and precuneus during a baseline state (in which no specific task performance is required) is related to the ‘representation (monitoring) of the world around us’. For posterior lateral parts of the default mode network the authors assume a specific role for the monitoring of targets at unfamiliar or unexpected locations. It should be emphasized that the default network plays an important role for consciousness as patient studies with lesions in posterior parts of the default network indicate.
Gusnard, D.A. & Raichle, M.E. (2001). Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 685-694.
Is alpha part of the default mode network? The reactivity, topography and functional meaning of alpha is similar to that of posterior parts
of a default mode network. (i) Activity decreases in a variety of different tasks; (ii) Resting activity is larger over posterior brain regions, (iii) Both systems are associated with ‚semantic
orientation‘.
The default mode network (Gusnard and Raichle, 2001)
Oscillations and joy:Peaks are more enjoyable than troughs