90

aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 2: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 3: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 4: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 5: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 6: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 7: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 8: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 9: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 10: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 11: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 12: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 13: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 14: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 15: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 16: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 17: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 18: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 19: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 20: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 21: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 22: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 23: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 24: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 25: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 26: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 27: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 28: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 29: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 30: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 31: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 32: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 33: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 34: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 35: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 36: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 37: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 38: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 39: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 40: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 41: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 42: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 43: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 44: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 45: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 46: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 47: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 48: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 49: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 50: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 51: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 52: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 53: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 54: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 55: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 56: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 57: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 58: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 59: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 60: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 61: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 62: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 63: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 64: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 65: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 66: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 67: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 68: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 69: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 70: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 71: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 72: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 73: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 74: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 75: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 76: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 77: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 78: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 79: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 80: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 81: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Greg
The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for A to happen, but the other asks for C to happen (among other things). In fact we should also include the term +P(we chose A AND door B was opened AND B)but this term is equal to zero. Here's what is going on. There is an event, X. In our case, X = (we chose A AND door B was opened). We are interested in P(X), as shown in orange above. We can say that P(X) = P(X and A) + P(X and B) + P(X and C), if A, B, C are mutually exclusive and cover all possibilities. Each of those 3 terms can have different values, but they will sum to P(X). Think of each term as a subset of X. (it makes sense that they are subsets of X, because they are more restrictive, and maintain all requirements of X). In fact not only are they subsets, but the 3 terms partition X. If X happens, then either (X and A) happens, or (X and B) happens, or (X and C) happens. In our case we have some additional information; X and B cannot happen.
Greg
Page 82: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Greg
Greg
Greg
Page 83: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 84: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 85: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 86: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 87: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 88: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 89: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for
Page 90: aloupis/comp61/notes/61-prob2-full.pdf · The 2 terms in the denominator are "mutually exclusive", which means that they have no intersection. We can see that because one asks for