ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer - water.rajasthan.gov.inwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed-development-and... · River Basin BANAS Major soil type Clay, Loamy clay

ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer

1, DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer



Chapter -1

Background and Introduction

1.1 Background of IWMP Watershed Project-

Land and water are essential elements for the sustainability of the human being. Indiscriminate

exploitation, injudicious and reckless use of resources for food, fodder and fuel has resulted in

excessive soil erosion, deforestation and moisture stress. The end of result is resource poor

situation leading to reduced food, fodder and fuel productivity.Again, when soil gets eroded and

water run-off, life of the poor farmers becomes measurable We have now reached such a

situation, where unless we think of a scientific approach, we may loose the vital resources for all

time to come . In order to save the two basic resources i.e. soil and water and at thesame time to

increase the production of our requirement of food, fodder and fuel in a sustainable basis, we

have to take up development of land and management of water resources on watershed.

Watershed Development program running in India from more than 40 years and recognized as a

key instrument for holistic development of village. There has been changes in the guidelines in

the watershed program on regular interval for improve the quality and for sustainability of the

program.

If we look over the history of the watershed program in India, we found that the concept and

adoption of watershed development methodology has been defined & redefined through trials

and errors, learning from successes & failures and considering the resource position and stake

holders’ aspiration. Watershed management is no longer the exclusive domain of soil & water

conservationists, it now needs equal contribution from social scientists, doctors and experts of

other disciplines also. It is not now a single way to see watershed program as a geohydoological

unit but there is urgent need to look watershed project as a key instrument for holistic

development of area with special focus on intregrating farming sector and livelihoods of the

assetless and backward community.



The Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India is

implementing a centrally Sponsored Scheme of “Integrated Watershed Management

Program” (IWMP) in the country from XIth plan. The major objective behind the watershed

development approach is to enhance and stabilize production through improved technology and

efficient use of natural resources for over all development of inhabitants of the watershed. The

latest “Common Guidelines” for IWMP has been formulated on the experiences of 14 years of

all stakeholders’ ministries. The focus of IWMP is to improve rural livelihoods through

participatory watershed development with focus on integrated farming system for enhancing

income, productivity and livelihood security in a sustainable manner. In the common

guidelines special emphasis is given on quality and realisytic DPR to be preparing through

participatory manner in facilitation of Watershed Development Team (WDT) for project period.

1.2 Location of Watershed Project

The project is located in the Ajmer district which is historical district and heart of Rajasthan. The

watershed project area is located approximately 15 km from Kekri on 3 km interior side of the

state highway 26. The watershed projects villages are spread in the area cover almost 12 km

maximum length from ALOLI to Mehrokhurd and 15 km width i.e Deopura to Sadri. The

project villages are located approximately in range of 12 to 25 km from block headquarter the

project and district head quarter Ajmer is located 95-120 km from the project villages.

The IWMP ALOLI watershed project area is situated between 26°06’00’’ to 26°11'26’’ North

Latitude and 74°38' 34’’ to 75°45'48’’ East longitude. Project area is bounded in the three sides

by the area of Kekri block and one side by Shahpura block of Bhilwara district.

Kekri

Nasirabad Kota

Location of Project Area

State Highway-26K

Project area



Table-1 General Features of ALOLI Watershed Project



Name of Project ALOLI Watershed , IWMP- VI

Name of Program IWMP

Location 26°06’00’’ to 26°11'26’’ North Latitude and

74°38' 34’’ to 75°45'48’’ East longitude

Block Kekri

Type of project Others

District Ajmer

Total Villages 10

Total Gram Panchayat 6

Micro and Macro 4, 8

Total Watershed Committee 6

Duration Six Years (2010-11 to 2015-16)

Total Geographical Area 6207 Ha

Sanction Area 6207 Ha

Area available for treatment 6207 Ha

Total Sanction Cost 744.8 Lakhs

Proposed Budget on Works 558.60 Lakhs

Proposed budget on NRM 417. Lakhs

Proposed budget on Productivity Enhace. 74.48 Lakhs

Proposed Budget on Livelihood Enhance. 67.03 Lakhs

Cost Per Ha (consolidated ) 14300 per Ha

Cost per Ha (IWMP project ) 12000 per Ha

From Project Cost 744.84 Lakhs

From Convergence 142.8 Lakhs

Ratio of convergence 16%

Agro climate zone III -A

Major crops Jowar, Bajra, Pulses, Wheat, Maize, Barley,

Castor, Urad, Oil Seed

Slope range 1-3 %



River Basin BANAS

Major soil type Clay, Loamy clay

Rainfall( Average) 525 mm

Majority of caste SC

Per capita of land 1.35 ha

Literacy rate 48 %

Small and Marginal farmers 72 %

Major option of livelihoods Agriculture, Dairy, Wage

Water table 25 meter

Source of drinking water Hand pump, Public drinking water system

Quality of drinking water Flurodie

Irrigation source Open well and Pond

Cattle Cow and Buffalo

Nearest town Kekri

Name of PIA AEN, Panchayat Samiti, Kekri, Ajmer

Coordinating Person from PIA Ramanand Chutervedi

Address (HO) Office of the Panchyat SamitiHead Quarter –Kekri Distrit –Ajmer

DWDU Project Manager, Soil and Water Conservation

Building, Chorisawad road, Ajmer



Table -2 Detail of Project Area

S. No

Name of Village

Gram Panchayat

Total Geographical area

Area Propose under Watershed

Total treatable area

Area Not available for treatment

1 Sadara Sadara 716 716 716 Nil

2 Sadari Sadara 561 561 561

3 ALOLI ALOLI 863 863 863

4 Balapura Mehrukalan 614 614 614

5 Nayagaon Mehrukalan 547 547 547

6 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan 2114 2114 2114

7 Gothara Piplaj 436 436 436

8 Deopura Kadera 100 100 100

9 Amli Gordha 105 105 105

10 Mehrukalan Gordha 151 151 151

Total 6207 Ha 6207 Ha 6207 Ha Total

Table-3 Micro watershed versus project villages

Macro No Micro Village Gram Panchayat Hq.11 1 Devpura Kadera 698

1 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan

1 Balapura Mehrukalan

3 Devpura Kadera 482

3 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan


4 Ghotra Piplaj 297

4 Amli Ghordha

12 1 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan 905


2 Mehrukalan Mehrukalan 3085

2 Aloli Aloli

2 Sadara Sadara

22 1 Ghotra Piplaj 520


2 Amli Ghordha 222

2 Mehrukhurd Ghordha



11.25

7.77

4.78

14.5849.70

8.38

3.54

Macro and Micro wise allocation of area

11/1 11/2 11/4 12/1 12/2 22/1 22/2

Project area is delienetaed into

three macro and seven micro

watershed projects. The maximum

area is covered under 12/2 micro

watershed and minimum area is

covered by 22/2 micro watershed.

The administrative set up of

project area of 6207 ha area is

divided into six gram Panchayat

and ten villages.

1.3 About Detail Project Report (DPR)

A DPR describe what a Watershed Project will try to achieve over a tenure of watershed project

of 4 to 7 years and how it intends to achieve it. DPR is containing the general features of the

watershed project, contain an analysis of the current situations of watershed project area and

particularly needs of the community with respect to land and water and existing potential in the

project area. ALOLI watershed project of Kekri block of Ajmer district is proposed for six years

duration (2010-11 to 2015-16).

1.4 Objectives of DPR-

PIA decided the following objectives for the DPR.

To prepare a Simple, Logical, Community Friendly and Comprehensive Detail Project

Report through following community base participatory approaches involving all

segments of communities and stakeholders.

To develop a livelihood plan through livelihood analysis for optimum utilization of scarce

available resources viz natural, physical, human and financial and analysis of vulnerability

in the project.

To develop a management grid for convergence with other department and their

authorities for pool out the financial resources in the project area.


1.5 Methodology adopted –The following methodology adopted for the preparation of DPR.

1. Rapport building in the project area

project area to understand the communities. De

communities, their culture, socio economic status and project a

helped to establish rapport in the project area. It is not a tough task because PIA is already

working in the project area fo

2. Organized Village Meetings

Panchayat levels to aware the communities about the watershed project. Senior officers

from the PIA also attended the meeting to motivate

the project

3. Base Line Survey- WDT team conducted the household survey in the project area with

support of volunteers. The data collected related to socio

every individual collected in the

project staff by visiting sample households giving priority to poor households belonging to

SC and ST communities.

Primary Data


The following methodology adopted for the preparation of DPR.

Rapport building in the project area – WDT members devoted sincere efforts in the

project area to understand the communities. Describe about the project and understand the

communities, their culture, socio economic status and project area. 3-4


working in the project area for execution of other rural schemes.

Organized Village Meetings – PIA organized few meetings at village level and gram


from the PIA also attended the meeting to motivate the community and develop the faith in

WDT team conducted the household survey in the project area with

support of volunteers. The data collected related to socio-economic status of each and

every individual collected in the prescribed format. Triangulation of the data made by the



Source of Data Collection

PRA Tools

House Hold survey

Scientific methods

Census records

Reports of line departments

e-literature

Secondary Data

DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer

The following methodology adopted for the preparation of DPR.

WDT members devoted sincere efforts in the

scribe about the project and understand the

4 months efforts


meetings at village level and gram


the community and develop the faith in

WDT team conducted the household survey in the project area with

economic status of each and

prescribed format. Triangulation of the data made by the





Process of PIA for village entry

4. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) – PIA carried out PRA in the every project villages

of the project area to ensure the participation and develop of ownership of project

community with the watershed project. Various tools were used with the communities

which help to aware the PIA about the available resources, identification of problems, their

prioritization, analysis and optimal solution to solve the problems. The most common tool

was FGD used to familiar with many issues relevant to the project.

5. Develop thematic layers of watershed project- Directorate of Watershed, Jaipur

nominated the PD-CORE for develop the thematic layer of the watershed project by using

GIS and remote sensing technology. These maps help to understand the basic

characteristics of the watershed project. The detail is given in coming chapter.

6. Desk Research - A systematic and focused desk research and internet assisted search for

relevant documents, reports, appraisals reviewed during preparation of DPR.

7. Processing and Analysis of Data - All the collected information from the primary and

secondary sources, desk reviews was analyzed and calibrated. The finding of the analysis

data have been used for develop vision document, strategy and action plan of the project

8. Writing of DPR- A comprehensive report developed by the PIA by following the

prescribed DPR template by the directorate.

9. Approval from Gram Sabha – PIA submitted the DPR in the concern Gram Sabha and

shared the activity plan. After approval of Gram Sabha, it was submitted to Jila Parishad

for approval by the district level committee.

Meeting with key

stakeholders

Individual contacts and meeting in

small groups

IEC methods for rapport

building

Villagemeeting

Gram Sabha at GP level



1.6 Limitations

The team of WDT enjoyed the working in preparing the watershed development treatment

plan however; the whole process had few limitations which reflect the process and progress of

the report.

1. The time duration allocated for the task was too short to deal with many intricate processes

to fine tune planning process.

2. Data collection from various sources spent most of the time of DPR preparation process.

3. Lack of inadequate data, delay in providing of data and unavailability of data were also a

key limitation for the PIA.

4. There was a general lack of response from the departments/individuals on request of WDT

members for providing of data but they were quite forthcoming in providing information’s

when WDT team visited.

5. It is possible that household format and PRA raised the expectations among local

community, which it may not be within the reach of PIA to fulfill the expectation of

everybody.

6. Capacity of WDT is also a limitation. They are fresher and new in the field of watershed

development.

Despite the these limitations, WDT team tried to capture the essence of the peoples aspirations

and hopes in the project area of Ajmer district and comprehend the grand vision in

consonance with current thinking

1.7 Delineation of Area- ALOLI watershed project is delineated in three macro and seven micro

watershed projects. The detail of villages and area in micro watershed has already mentioned in

table. The project area is divided into ten villages under six gram panchyats. The maximum area

covered under Mehru Kalan gram panchyat followed by Sadara, ALOLI, Piplaj, Gordha and

Kadera. The biggest village is Mehrukalan in the project area and smallest village in terms of

area is Deopura. The figure and data is mentioned below to prove the statement.



Table- 4 Detail of gram panchyats in project area S.No Name of GP Area % of area Sanction cost (Rs

in Lakhs)

1 Sadara 1277 20.57 153.24

2 ALOLI 863 13.90 103.56

3 Mehrukalan 3275 52.78 393

4 Kadera 100 1.61 12

5 Piplaj 436 7.02 52.32

6 Goradha 256 4.12 30.72

Total 6207 100 744.84

20.57

13.9

52.76

1.617.02

4.12

Classification of area among gram panchyats

Sadara Alloli Mehrukalan Kadera Piplaj Goradha



1.8 Administrative Setup of District

Ajmer, formerly written as Ajmeru is a city in ajmer district in Rajasthan state surrounded by

Aravali mountains, this is the city ruled by great “Parthvi Raj Singh Chouhan “ It is situated in

the heart of Rajasthan. The district is known for Khwaja Moinuddhin Chisti’s Dargah and

religious Pushkar town, where temple of Lord Bhrama, is situated.

The district is situated between 25°38’00’’ and 26°58'06’’ North Latitude and 73°54' 00’’ to

75°22'00’’ East longitude covering geographical area of 8,481 sq km. It is bounded on north by

Naguar, on the south by Bhilwara, on the east by Jaipur and west by Pali district. Name of Ajmer

is derived from Ajeymeru (the invincible hill). Administratively Ajmer district is part of Ajmer

division and it is divided four sub division and into six tehsil Ajmer, Nasirabad, Beawar, Kekri,

Kishangarh and Sarwar. The Ajmer district has been divided into 8 Panchyat samiti i.e Silora,

Pisangan, Binay, Masooda, Jawaja, Arain, Kekri abd Srinagar. Ajmer is having 1083 villages

and 276 gram Panchayat. Ajmer district comes under Ajmer division.



Table-5 Ajmer district at a glance

S.No Particular Unit Data

1 Total Geographical area Sq Km 8481

2 Sub division 10

3 Tehsil 10

4 Blocks 8

5 Gram Panchyats 276

6 Revenue villages 1022

7 Mean annual rainfall mm 633.9

8 Ranges of hills ARAVALI

9 River basin Banas,

10 Important rivers Khari, Dai

11 Populations (2001) Lakhs 21.80

12 Important lakes Buda pushkar, Pushkar, Anasagar

13 Cultivable area % 77.06%

14 forest area % 6.49%

15 uncultivable area % 16.40

16 Principal crops Jowar, Bajra, Pulses, Wheat, Maize, Barley,

Castor, Urad, Oil Seed

17 Source of irrigation Open well, Tube well, Pond, Canal,

1.9 Agro climate zone- The Rajasthan state has been divided into five divisions on the basis of

bio physical features, rainfall, soil profile and available water for irrigation. Three divisions have

been further divided due to diversification. The agro climate of the Ajmer district is

characterized by semi arid. It is moderate and healthy. The district has a hot, dry summer and

bracing cold season. The zone is comes under III A which name as dry semi arid flat land area.

54.6 % of total land of 29.48 lakh ha is comes under agriculture. Open well and talab are the key

source of irrigation.



Table-6 Characteristics of agro climate zone- III A

Total area Net sown

area

Districts Rainfall

range

Max and

Min

Temp

Major crops Soil

29.48 lac

Ha

54.5 % Ajmer

Jaipur,

Tonk,

Dausa

500-600

mm

50 deg

cen. to 4

deg cen.

Bajra ,Moong,

Gram, Jowar,

Wheat,

Sandy

loam



1.10 Climate and Rainfall

Mean annual rainfall (2000-2011) of the project area is 524 mm which is close to the average

rainfall of 472 mm. The number of rainy days varies between 6 to 22 in monsoon period but

average rainy days are 11. If we ignore the last two years good rainfall, the mean rainfall of the

area of last one decade is only 376 mm.

The analysis of data gives the impression that almost 95% of the total annual rainfall is received

during the southwest monsoon, which enters the district in the last week of June and withdraws

in the middle of September. Probability of average annual rainfall exceeding 500 mm is only

10%. However, there is 90% probability that the average rainfall will be more than 300 -450mm.

The probability of occurrence of mean annual rainfall is 30-50%. Drought analysis based on

agriculture criteria indicates that the district is prone to mild and normal type of droughts.

Occurrence of severe and very severe type of drought is rare. January is the coldest month with

mean maximum and minimum temperatures being lowest at 22.20

C & 4.50

C. Temperature in

summer month, June, reaches up to 460

C. There is drop in temperature due to onset of monsoon

and rises again in the month of September. Atmosphere is generally dry except during the

monsoon period. The humidity is highest in August with mean daily relative humidity 80%.

If we just analysis the data of last 11 years , we found that four times project area got under good

rainfall and three times and under deficit rainfall otherwise four times rains occur to near to

normal rainfall of project area.

Table- 7 Rainfall of Project area

Year 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Rainfall (mm) 1069 734 438 336 442 384

No of Rainy days 22 15 6 12 11 9

Year 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000

Rainfall (mm) 406 697 476 213 601 495

No of Rainy days 10 11 10 05 11 11



Table- 8 Maximum rainfall intensity Duration Rainfall intensity

(mm)

15 min duration 65 mm



Table- 9 Temperature of season in project area Season Max(degree

centigrade)Min (degree centigrade)

Summer 49.2 32

Winter 28 5.2

Rainy 38 15

1069

734

438336

442384406

697

476

213

601495

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Rainfall pattern of last 10 years of project area



1.11 Infrastruture facility in project area

Table -11 Infrastructure Facilities –

Infr

astr

uctu

re S

adar

a

Sad

ri

AL

OL

I

Bal

apur

a

Nay

agao

n

Meh

ruka

lan

Got

hara

Deo

puar

a

Am

li

Meh

rakh

urd

PHC √Post office √ √ √Telephone √ √ √ √ √ √ √Aganwadi √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Primary school √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Secondary school √ √ √Ration shop √ √ √ √

Tape connection √Veterinary hospital √Bank √LAMPS √Cooperative √ √BMC Patwar circle √ √ √Gravel road √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Damar road √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √Railway station Police station Dairy √ √ √



Table –12 Detail of roads available in project area Type of road Length (KM)

National Highway Nil

Major road 12.64

Medium road 50.70

Other road 92.97

Village road 33.42Note- jAIPUR-Shahpura-Bhilwara has declared as highway and work is under process. Project area is located on the way of Kekri-Shahpura road.

Infrastructure facilities in the project area are remarkably poor in the project area. The available

infrastructure in the project area is mentioned above in the table, it shows that Mehrukalan is the

only project villages which has comparatively better position and have necessary facilities

otherwise majority of project villages are suffer due to lack of facilities.

The condition of roads from the Kekri towards any side is extremely poor except towards

Nasirabad. Nearest highway is national highway 12 which is at Deoli 40 km from project area.

1.12 Institution at project level

Strong Institutions are the key factor for sustainability of any project. The five institutions

formed at project level are described below.

Project Implementing Agency (PIA)

Watershed Development Team (WDT)

Self Help Groups (SHGs)

Users Group (UGs)

Watershed Committee (WC)

1.12.1About Project Implementing Agency (PIA) – Jila Parishad, DWDC Ajmer appointed

Assistant Engineer, Kekri Panchayat Samiti as the PIA of the IWMP-VI, ALOLI watershed

project.



Table- 13 Detail of PIA

Name of PIA Assistant Engineer, Panchyat Samiti Kekri

Name of chief functionary Sh R. N. Chutervedi

Designation A. En. Panchayat Samiti Kekri

Department Watershed Development & Soil Conservation.

Office address Panchayat Samiti, Kekri

Phone 01467-220015, 9530300242

Mail id [email protected],[email protected]

1.12.2Watershed Development Team (WDT) - WDT is the pillar of any watershed project.

PIA recruited dedicated team of young professionals of four member’s team in multidisciplinary

field. The brief detail is given below in the table. The table shows that one member in the team

are female in field of sociology. The team is new in the field but highly committed and

dedicated for the watershed project.

Table- 14 Brief detail of WDT team for IWMP-X watershed project

S. Name of member Sex Age Designation Qualification Experience

1 Bijendra Kumar M 30 Engineering Diploma 12 Months

2 Om Prakash Sharma M 26 Agriculture B.SC(Ag) 15 Months

3 Deo raj Pareek M 24 Veterinary Diploma( AH) 16 Months

4 Meena Mali F 22 Social science B.A in sociology

15 Months

Detail Project Report ALOLI, Ajmer


1.12.3 About DWDC- The unit at district level looking after the IWMP is called DWDC. The

office of DWDU is located in the Jila Parishad, Collectorate Ajmer managed by XEN (Land

resources). DWDU is currently looking after 18 IWMP watershed projects in the district.

Table -15 Detail of DWDU

Name of DWDU Executive Engineer (Land Resources)

District Ajmer

Name of chief functionary Sh Kan Singh Solanki

Designation Project Manager DWDU

Total staff available 10

Technical staff 3

Supporting staff 7

Address Project Manager ( IWMP ),DWDU Chorasiawas Road, Ajmer

Telephone No 0145-2641329

E mail [email protected]

1.12.4 About SLNA – This is the apex body at state level. Directorate of Watershed

Development and Soil Conservation (WD & SC) is the playing the role of SLNA in the

Rajasthan

Table –16 Detail of SLNA

Name of SLNA Directorate, Watershed Development & Soil Conservation

State Rajasthan

Name of chief functionary Mrs. Pramila Surana

Designation Chief Executive Officer cum Director

Address Pant Krishi Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur

Date of notification 3/2/2009

Chairperson Sh S. Ahmed, Additional chief secretary

Telephone No 0141-2227189

Fax No. 0141-2227858

E mail [email protected]



1.12.5 Sub Committee Watershed - (WC)-

As per envisaged in the common guidelines that Watershed committee would be formed at Gram

Panchayat level in the Gram Sabha in a democratic manner by ensure the active involvement and

participation of all segment of society. WDT team will provide the technical support in

formation of the watershed committee. In the Rajasthan, Directorate of Watershed and Soil

conservation, state government did few amendments in the favor of strengthening Panchayati raj

system.

1. WC declared as a subcommittee-Watershed of the Gram Panchayat and work in control and

closed supervision of Gram Panchayat.

2. Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat is declared and included in the watershed committee along with

Chairman and secretary of the watershed committee. Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat replace by

the chairperson as one of the signatory of the watershed committee.

3. No need for registration of the subcommittee under any legal act.

PIA constituted six WC (Sub committee- Watershed) one each at Gram Panchayat in the ALOLI

watershed project. The committee constituted in the gram sabha organized in the village. The

members of the committee selected through democratic manner. The important thing to consider

is that responsibilities of two designation discharge by one person i.e in this particular watershed

project, Sarpanch of the gram panchyat also act as a chair person of the watershed committee.

During selection of committee it was taking care of fulfillment of norms of the guidelines. The

gram sabha organized after series of village meetings in the village. The representatives from

SHG, UG, and GP were covered. Women were also included in the watershed committee.

The table given below reveal the fact female representation is good and as per norms of the

guidelines. Table gives no idea about the reperesentaion of the small and marginal farmers but

PIA assured the representation of SHGs and UGs in the watershed committee. The caste wise

analysis is also given in the table however SC/ST ratio is less as compare to their population in

the project area.



Table-17 Analysis of watershed committee

Name of GP Total members Male Female SC/ST OBC Others

Sadara 13 7 6 2 6 5

Mehru Kalan 15 9 6 1 4 10

ALOLI 13 8 5 4 4 5

Kadera 13 11 2 4 2 4

Peeplaj 10 8 2 2 4 4

Gordha 13 10 3 3 7 3

Table-18 Sub Watershed Committee- SadaraName of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri , Bank Name A/C No. 6882000100005804

S.No

Name of Member

Sex

Father/Husband

Category Qualification Representative Designation

1 Smt Sayari devi F Kana Bheel ST VIII Sarpanch Chairperson

2 Mahendra singh M Sangram singh Gen B.A Elected Secretary

3 Rakesh M Bhawar Lal Gen XII UGs Member

4 Kailash chand M bhawar lal Gen B.A UGs Member

5 Narayan lal M Mahaveer sadhu

OBC X UGs Member

6 Satya Narayan M Kana kahar OBC X UGs Member

7 Ram dhan M Salag gurjar OBC X UGs Member

8 Badami bai F Madho meena ST III SHGs Member

9 Kanta devi F Narayan sadhu OBC II SHGS Member

10 Pushpa F Gajendra garj Gen B.A UGs Member

11 Beena F Kialash rajawat

OBC VIII SHG Member

12 Shakuntala F Gopal sadhu OBC IX SHG Member

13 Deoraj pareek M R.R Pareek Gen B.A WDT Member



Table-19 Sub Watershed Committee- Mehru Kalan Name of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri A/C No. 6882000100005318

S.No

Name of Member

Sex Father/Husband Category Qualification

Representative

Designation

1 Kalu Ram M Teju Ram dhobi SC X Sarpanch Chairperson

2 Pratap singh M Satya Narayan singh

Gen B.A Elected Secretary

3 Ratan lal M Rama ji OBC XI UGs Member

4 Bhankar lal M Ramdev OBC X UGs Member

5 Suresh chand M Bhag chand Gen XI UGs Member

6 Dashrath M Mithun Lal Gen B.A UGs Member

7 Hari Ram M Madho ji OBC X UGs Member

8 Jitendra singh F Narendra singh Gen B.A SHGs Member

9 Saroj F Khem raj singh Gen X SHGS Member

10 Shushila F Durga lal Gen X UGs Member

11 Seema F Kishan ji Gen X SHG Member

12 Kanwari rathore F Narendra singh Gen X SHG Member

13 Manoj M Kishore sen OBC VIII SHG Member

14 Meena F Dalpat singh Gen X SHG Member

15 Deoraj pareek M R.R.Pareek Gen B.A WDT Member



Table-20 Name of Gram Panchayat- ALOLIName of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri Bank Name and A/C No. 6882000100008245

S.No

Name of Member

Sex Father/Husband

Category Qualification Representative

Designation

1 Mukesh M Rameshwar SC XI Sarpanch Chairperson

2 Indra pal M Ram meena ST B.A Elected Secretary

3 Chetan M Bhag chand Gen X UGs Member

4 Sukhlal M Kana ram gurjar

OBC X UGs Member

5 Badri Lal M Mohan lal SC VIII UGs Member

6 Urmila M Chetan prakash GEN X UGs Member

7 Rashmi M Bhawar lal OBC V UGs Member

8 Ram kumar F Ram kishan ST IX SHGs Member

9 Maina devi F Satya narayan OBC X SHGS Member

10 Kamla devi F Ladhu ram GEN X UGs Member

11 Shushila devi F Shankar lohar OBC X SHG Member

12 Surji devi F Gansh lal OBC X SHG Member

13 Deo raj pareek M R.R Pareek GEN B.A SHG Member



Table-21 Sub Watershed Committee- KaderaName of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri A/C No. 6882000100005309

S.No

Name of Member

Sex Father/Husband

Category Qualification

Representative

Designation

1 Kaushliya devi F Yogesh joshi GEN X Sarpanch Chairperson

2 Bhanwar lal M Mohan lal OBC B.A Elected Secretary

3 Ramdhan M Amba lal OBC XI UGs Member

4 Ramdhan M Surat mal OBC X UGs Member

5 Chotu lal M Rupa regar SC X UGs Member

6 Kaluram M Banshi gurjar OBC VIII UGs Member

7 Babu lal M Banna gurjar OBC IX UGs Member

8 Ratan lal M Ram lal OBC VIII SHGs Member

9 Sawar mal M Mahaveer Viashnav

GEN VIII SHGS Member

10 Amar chand M Bainath gurjar OBC V UGs Member

11 Hema devi F Baheru lal GEN IX SHG Member

12 Naurat mal M Rama bheel ST III SHG Member

13 Deo raj M R.P.Pareek GEN B.A SHG Member



Table-22 Sub watershed committee- Peeplaj Name of Bank –Punjab National Bank-KekriBank Name and A/C No. 6882000100005372

S.No Name of Member

Sex Father/Husband


Representative

Designation

1 Santhosh devi M Panchu Lal SC X Sarpanch Chairperson

2 Ram pal M Ram balai SC B.A Elected Secretary

3 Bankari devi F Neha ram OBC X UGs Member

4 Jai singh M Bheru lodha OBC X UGs Member

5 Ram kishan M Shir ram lodha OBC XI UGs Member

6 Sita ram M Shankar lal OBC X UGs Member

7 Chagan lal M Hardeo meena ST X UGs Member

8 Lakehwar M Debi meena ST XI SHGs Member

9 Basanti F Bhag chand OBC X SHG Member

10 Deo raj M R.P. meena GEN B.A SHG Member



Table-23 Sub Watershed Committee - Gordha Name of Bank –Punjab National Bank-Kekri A/C No. 6882000100010174

S.No

Name of Member

Sex Father/Husband


Representative Designation

1 Lakma M Rama balai SC VIII Sarpanch Chairperson

2 Madan Lal M Jagdish gurjar OBC B.A Elected Secretary

3 Krishna gopal M Ramnath OBC X UGs Member

4 Jagdish M Udha kanhar OBC IX UGs Member

5 Gheesa M Uma regar OBC X UGs Member

6 Gopal M Uma gurjar SC X UGs Member

7 Bajrang M Bheema OBC VIII UGs Member

8 Bhagwan swaroop

M Ramnath OBC XII SHGs Member

9 Gita F Ladho khati OBC X SHG Member

10 Asha F Mahendra SC X SHG Member

11 Anoop M Ram dhanu OBC X SHG Member

12 Shushila F Rameshwar GEN X SHG Member

13 Deoraj M R.D. Pareek GEN X WDT Member

1.12.6 Self Help Groups- The SHGs constituted in the project area from the project community

belong to SC/ST, BPL and small & marginal farmers. They are generally asset less person and

belong to the poorest of the poor community. SHGs provide a scope and optimum forum for

them to discuss on development issues and assure their involvement in decision making.

PIA did focus on identifying the existing SHGs and developed the list of existing SHGs available

in the project area on which PIA focus to revive in future of the non functioning SHGs and also

PIA will provide focus on the strengthening of the existing institutions.

In first step, SHGs were identified among the list of non functioning SHGs institutions those can

strengthen through facilitation of the project on some criteria’s.



These SHGs would be link with the activities for income generation under livelihood component.

Efforts would be made to search out the sustainable solution. These group members are small

homogeneous group to be organized in future through saving and thrift activity after a certain

stage. Till writing of DPR, total 19 SHGs formed in the project area. Details of SHGs are given

in chapter-8 of the report. All SHGs are new, PIA did not identified any exiting SHGs to be

supported in future by the watershed project

Table-24 Detail of SHGs

Gram

Panchayat

Total

SHGs

Male

SHG

Female

member

Male

members

Female

member

Gordha 1 0 1 0 11

ALOLI 3 1 2 10 23

Kadera 1 0 1 0 13

Peeplaj 1 0 10 0 10

Sadara 10 0 10 0 105

Mehru Kalan 3 0 3 0 34

1.12.7 Users Group (UGs)

These are the homogeneous groups of the persons most affected by the activity implemented

under the project and having land holding in the project. PIA constituted activity wise users

groups (UGs) in the project area. The key responsibilities of the UGs are

To execute the work in the project

Post project management of the work

Judiciously use of the resources on common land

Operation and maintenance of the project

The UGs formed in the project are for the following activities

1. Arable land development

2. Non arable land development



3. Pasture land development

4. Live stock management

5. DLT group

6. Horticulture group

7. Livelihoods

Table- 25 Detail of UGs

Name of gram panchyats No of Users

Group

Total

members

Type of groups Remarks

Gordha 6 30 Arable, Non

arable, DLT,

Pasture,

horticulture,

livestock,

Livelihoods,

Organic

Maximum 5

members in a

group, all are

male members

ALOLI 6 30

Kadera 6 30

Peeplaj 6 30

Sadara 6 30

Mehru Kalan 6 26

1.13 Problems and scope for improvement of the project area

PIA is working in the project area from a long time and very well aware about the problems

which are act as barrier in holistic development of the area. Key problems are mentioned below

in context of watershed program.

The livelihood status of the project communities may be improved by united efforts in an

intregrated manner with special focus on intregraing farming sector. Fortunately area has a lot of

scope and poteintial for soil and water conservation and productivit

sector. The strategy and plan is discussed further in the report.

1.14 SWOC analysis - (Tool for Reflective Analysis for Livelihood Enhancement

Development and Growth)

SWOC Analysis is an appraisal, planning and monitoring

situations and facilitates developing strategic decision logics. SWOC analysis of four major

sectors viz., Agriculture, horticulture, animal husbandry and fisheries for project area is given

below:

Low literacy in project area

Low water productivity

Lack of support and extension mechanism in the project area specially in agriulture sector

Lack of employment opportunity for youth

Low productivity in agriculture sector and livestock

Comes under critical zone due to deepen water table

Farmer attitude towards crop diversification and pasture land

Lack of available fund to purchase quality input at time of requirement

Lack of institutional mechanism for collective efforts

Lack of infrastructure facilities avaiable for intregrated development of area

Large area under rainfed

Detail Project Report ALOLI




scope and poteintial for soil and water conservation and productivity enhancement of the farming

sector. The strategy and plan is discussed further in the report.

(Tool for Reflective Analysis for Livelihood Enhancement

SWOC Analysis is an appraisal, planning and monitoring tool used to understand and analyze



Lack of support and extension mechanism in the project area specially in agriulture

Lack of employment opportunity for youth

Low productivity in agriculture sector and livestock

Comes under critical zone due to deepen water table

Farmer attitude towards crop diversification and pasture land

Lack of available fund to purchase quality input at time of requirement

Lack of institutional mechanism for collective efforts

Lack of infrastructure facilities avaiable for intregrated development of area


DPR_IWMP VI, Kekri, Ajmer



y enhancement of the farming

(Tool for Reflective Analysis for Livelihood Enhancement

tool used to understand and analyze



Lack of support and extension mechanism in the project area specially in agriulture



1. Agriculture sub sector

Strength Weakness

1. Large sector (approximately more than

80-85% H/Hs) involve in agriculture

and allied sector.

2. Suitable and favorable agro climate

condition for pulses and oil seeds

3. Mechanized farming gaining

importance

1. Fragmented and low land holding

2. Under developed agriculture input storage facilities

and distribution network;

3. Inadequate availability of quality seeds and fertilizer

as per demand at time when required

4. Non receptiveness of local farming communities

towards improve technology and modern practices

Opportunity Challenges

1. Rain water harvesting for increasing

agriculture area through surface

water sources

2. Scope to increase the area under

organic farming

3. Strengtening the seed production

program

1. Market fluctuation for price rate

2. Erratic and uncertainty in rainfall

3. Ensure the availability of fertilizer and seeds at

government units

4. Disenchantment among youth farmers towards

agriculture as an occupation

2. Horticulture and Vegetable sector

Strength Weakness

Suitable agro climate conditions

Market is nearby available

Low adoption rate of MIS

Negligible area at present

Opportunities Challenges

Suitable agro – climate for a variety of

semi tropical, rainfed fruit and variety

of seasonal vegetables, spices, root and

tuber crops;

Change the farmers attitude and mindset towards

crop diversification



3. Animal Husbandry sector

STRENGTH

Significant population of desi cattle

available

Good source of farm yard for promotion

of organic farming

WEAKNESSES.

Non descript local breed available of low milk

productivity.

Poor feeding management practices

Open grazing as common and significantly

prevalent practices

Inadequate available infrastructure

OPPORTUNITY

Scope to introduce localized breed

Potential to use large quantity of cattle

waste for bio energy

Develop the capacity of rural youth for

primary health treatment

Promotion of good quality fodder

cultivation

CHALLENGES

Market fluctuations

Recurring droughts in project area

Change the mind set of stereo minded

community

1.15 Goal of project

PIA has worked out on the en-visioning exercise and developed the strategies to achieve the goal

which was formulated in the Gram Sabha. The goal of the ALOLI – watershed is

The Vision is to improve the livelihood status of the project community by “adoption of

appropriate technology managemen and Good agriculture practices with special focus on soil

fertility, harnessing potential for dairy and inducing growth in farm economy by establishing

dynamic backward, forward, technical and financial linkages with higher markets and

institutions of leaning”.



Priority of the project

Motivate the farmers to improve soil health by following the recommendation of soil

health card

Promotion of green jobs works to sequester the carbon in the soil

Productivity enhancement of the agriculture sector by varietal change, adoption of

improve technology and practices

Motivate the farmers for crop diversification

Capacity building of farmers for GAP(good agriculture practices)

Improving water use efficiency

Alternate livelihood sources of the poor community members

Promotion of dairy program

Promotion of green jobs works to mitigate the effect and adapt with climate change

To secure livelihoods of the community of project area

Establish link for forward and backward linkages to provide good income to the farmers

Promotion of structure promote surface water bodies



CHAPTER -2

GENERAL FEATURES OF ALOLI

WATERSHED PROJECT



Chapter -2

General Profile of ALOLI Watershed Project

This chapter deals with general characteristics and gives an overall impression of ALOLI

watershed project and help to understand the project at a glance.

2.1 Need of ALOLI Watershed Project- Department of land resources developed 13 list of

indicators to facilitate the department for identification of the watershed project for treatment.

Panchayat Samiti, Kekri proposed the ALOLI watershed on the basis of same 13 parameters. A

composite index has been developed on the weight given. List of parameters and scoring against

each parameter is mentioned below in below paragraph. 103 weight age out of 150 shows the

need of the watershed project in the area. The main five reasons for selection of watershed

project in this area are in priority order

1. Contiguity to developed watershed area

2. Actual wages

3. Ground water status

4. Productivity potential

5. Area under rainfed

Table-26 Weight age Index

S. No.

Criteria Maximum score

Weight age

i Poverty index (% of poor to population) 10 7.5

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 5

iii Actual wages 5 5

iv % of small and marginal farmers 10 5

v Ground water status 5 5

vi Moisture index/ 15 10

DPAP/ DDP Block



vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15 10

viii Drinking water 10 5

ix Degraded land 15 10

x Productivity potential of the land 15 10

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 10

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 5

xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 5

Total 150 92.5

2.2 Demographic Detail

The total households of ALOLI watershed project area of the 10 villages in the project area is

3109. The table given below gives the impression that biggest village is Mehrukalan with 792

H/Hs (25.40 %) and Balapura is smallest village with 108 H/Hs (3.4%) in the project area. The

figure given below reveal the fact that SC % of population is maximum in Sadara village with

55.47% and minimum in Gothra village , followed by ST population in ALOLI village with

59.24% and minimum in Sadara village with 1.47%. OBC population is almost equially

distributed among all villages but maximum in Gothara village. The figure mentioned below

gives the impression that majority of population of the project area belong to SC (31%), followed

by ST (21.6%), OBC (14%) and other 33.3(%).

The total population of the 10 villages of the ALOLI watershed project area is 16913. The male

population percentage is 54.9% and female percentage is 45.1%. Sex ratio in project area is 825

female to 1000 male. The BPL population percentage in the project area is 14.45%.



Table-27 Demographic information of the ALOLI watershed

Name of Village Total H/Hs

Total family Total family

SC ST OBC Others BPL APL

Sadara 563 312 11 69 171 112 451

Sadari 220 60 83 23 54 34 186

ALOLI 476 132 282 18 44 70 406

Balapura 108 34 44 9 21 14 94

Nayagaon 223 50 60 33 80 16 207

Mehrukalan 792 184 81 158 369 116 676

Gothra 150 1 37 33 79 25 125

Deopura 113 37 6 21 49 46 67

Amli 339 109 43 56 131 13 326

Mehrukhurd 125 47 25 16 37 3 122

Total 3109 966 672 436 1035 449 2660

31

21.614

33.3

Caste Classification of Project area

SC ST OBC Others



Table- 28 Percentage wise analysis of caste of project villages

Name of village

SC ST OBC Others

Sadara 55.42 1.95 12.26 30.37

Sadari 27.27 37.73 10.45 24.55

ALOLI 27.73 59.24 3.78 9.24

Balapura 31.48 40.74 8.33 19.44

Nayagaon 22.42 26.91 14.80 35.87

Mehrukalan 23.23 10.23 19.95 46.59

Gothra 0.67 24.67 22.00 52.67

Deopura 32.74 5.31 18.58 43.36

Amli 32.15 12.68 16.52 38.64

Mehrukhurd 37.60 20.00 12.80 29.60

14.44

85.56

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

90.00

BPL APL

Well Being status of project area



Table –29 Population data

Name of village Male Female Total Sadara 1606 1313 2919

Sadari 716 586 1302

ALOLI 1456 1191 2647

Balapura 353 288 641

Nayagaon 640 524 1164

Mehrukalan 2305 1886 4191

Gothra 471 386 857

Deopura 339 278 617

Amli 1043 872 1915

Mehrukhurd 363 297 660

Total 9292 7621 16913 Source- Panchayat samiti, Kekri

2.3 Land use – Land use is the most important feature of any watershed project. For ALOLI

watershed project, land use pattern is quite surprising which prove by the table given below.

Table- 30 Land Use Pattern of ALOLI Watershed Project (In Ha)Name of Villages

Total area

Arable Land Non Arable land

Cultivable Non Cultivable

Pasture Forest Others

Irrigated Non Irrigated

Sadara 716 156 261 106 121 72

Sadari 561 81 203 122 95 60

ALOLI 863 159 244 160 246 54

Balapura 614 145 300 112 35 22

Nayagaon 547 109 227 51 108 52

Mehrukalan 2114 426 913 239 322 214

Gothra 436 101 134 69 100 32

Deopura 100 20 44 18 - 18

Amli 105 14 32 11 48

Mehrukhurd 151 22 47 13 27 42

6207 1233 2405 901 1054 614



73.13

17

9.9

Land Ownership pattern of project area

Private GP Revenue

73.13

16.98

0.009.89

Land Use Pattern

Cultivable Pasture Forest Revenue

The total sanction area available for treatment is 6207 ha of ten villages in six gram panchayat.

Land use pattern in terms of ownership of the ALOLI watershed project gives an impression that

73.13% of the total area is own by farmers i.e private land, 17% of total area own by gram

panchyats i.e pasture land and 9.9 % of the total loand own by revenue department.

The data also reveal the fact that maximum

area covered under private land which may

be categorise into 58.6 % cultivable land

use by farmer for agriculture and 14.5 %

cultivable waste land which is presently

fallow or use by farmer for fodder purpose

only. PIA will pay special focus to develop

the waste cultivable land into productive

purpose to enhance the income of the

farmer.

Forest land is zero in the project area,

pasture land is 17% which is a major part

but fodder production is very low as

compare to area. This land is also

encroached by farmers in few villages

The data of the project area also gives the

impression that PIA has to do more

efforts for treatment of arable land

because it covers almost ¾ area of the

total project area. Treatment of the

degraded land is the priority under ownership of gram panchyat and revenue.



Table-31 Land Use and Land Cover Pattern

S.No Title Area (Ha )

1 Agriculture Land without crop 132.70

2 Agriculture land with Kharif crop 1470.58

3 Agriculture land with Kharif and Rabi crop 2640.27

4 River 200.90

5 Land without scrub 1262.73

6 Land with scrub 453.33

7 Mining /Industrial waste 5.59

8 Scattered vegetation 46.93

9 Settlement 32.13

10 Water body 273.53

11 Gully/raveneous 12.43

19.8

53

27.2

Irrigated Non irrigated others

Irrigation status

Table-32 Contour interval

Contour Interval HL LL

Major contour 5 m 359 327

Minor contour 1 m 359 327



2.4 Topography -The area is composed of comparatively flat tracts (more than 84% area under 1

% slope) of low difference between ridges and valleys. The hills are very less (less than 1%) in

project area and it is not surrounded by hills and no hillock found in the project area so drainage

area is very less.

If we talk about slope, table mentioned

below give the clear impression about the

area. The slope map enclosed in chapter -8

reveal about the contour pattern of the

project area and slope of the project area.

The slope and contour map developed by

the PDCORE agency for the project area

and important features of the map presented here

Table-34 Detail of drainage pattern of project area

Stream order Length(Meter) Area(Ha )

First order 28518.11 1.22

Second order 10037.2 2.56

Third order 1412.72 6.01

Fourth order NIL NIL

84.05

13.512.03 0.34 0.08

Slope analysis of project area

0-1% 1-3% 3-5% 5-10% More than 10 %

Table-33 Slope pattern of project area

Slope range Area (ha) Percentage

0-1% 5323.2 84.05

1-3% 855.4 13.51

3-5% 128.4 2.03

5-10% 21.72 0.34

More than 10 % 4.93 0.08



2.5 Soil – The predominant Soil of the project area is classified mainly into color of yellow, light

brown. It is mainly type of clay and clay loamy, few area also have sandy loam with kankar.

These soil having poor moisture retention capacity.

WDT team carried out the transect walk under PRA

exercise in the project village to identify the soil

type, soil health and understand the soil texture and

structure. The types of soil are vary village to

village to in the project area.

The table given shows the soil health status of the

project villages which reveal about micro nutrient

status of the soil health. The map of the kekri block

is also given below to show the soil health status of

the project area.

Table- 35 Soil analysis of project area

Village N2 P2O K2O

Sadara L M M

Sadari M M M

ALOLI L H M

Balapura M M M

Nayagaon M M M

Mehrukalan M M M

Gothra L M M

Deopura M M H

Amli M M H

Mehrukhurd M M M



Note- L –Low, M-Medium, H-High



2.6 Literacy - Literacy is one of the main factors for the overall development of the area. Only

literacy can provide valuable and knowledgeable based working force that is one of the four

inevitable instruments for the development. Ajmer district have a good position in terms of

literacy but position of Kekri block is slightly poor as compare to average rate of Ajmer district

and project area literacy rate is also at lower side.

Table-36 Literacy Rate of Project area

Literacy Rate Male Female

Rajasthan 67.5 % 80.5% 52.70%

Ajmer 70.46 % 83.93 % 56.42 %

Kekri 67.53 77.48 55.39

2.7 Erosion Status- Project area is affected by only water erosion. Majority of area is flat so intensity of erosion is not so much high but it is significant due to barren land and land use practice.

Table-37 Detail of Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha)

Water erosion

a Sheet 4030

b Rill 1545

c Gully 632

Sub-Total

Wind erosion

Total 6207 ha



2.8 Land Holding

Land classification on the basis of land holding is very interesting in the project areas. Table

shows the village wise data of each project village about types of farmers and their respective

land holding. Analysis of the data of project villages reveals the fact that approximately 45.8 %

of farmer comes under marginal farmer category followed bysmall farmers 27.8 %, 23.5 % of

medium farmers and 1 % of big farmers in project area. The total population of small and

marginal farmers is 72 % of total households which is a huge part. In nutshell, the total families

of small and marginal farmers (SMF) are approximately 72% and their land holding is just 39 %

of the project area. Average land holding of the project area is 1.35 ha land. The data available

with the PIA also shows that approximately 85 % of the SC/ST category farmers belong to small

and marginal farmer category.

Table- 38 Detail of land holdings

S.No

Name of village

Total families

Marginal Small Medium Big Land less

No. Area No. Area No. Area No.

Area No

1 Sadara 605 276 163.02 172 254.28 152 559.6 5 79.56 0

2 Sadari 281 92 45.7 90 110.84 84 244.15 3 10.71 12

3 ALOLI 551 300 137.05 112 125.11 124 380.04 6 18.2 9

4 Balapura 160 55 37.3 37 56.33 58 253.04 2 11.62 8

5 Nayagaon 214 69 40.57 72 105.96 56 203.93 2 14.19 15

6 Mehrukalan 845 375 215.03 272 392.1 179 651.13 15 233.2 4

7 Gothra 124 53 24.14 28 39.07 41 146 2 26.18 0

8 Deopura 185 112 57.05 51 74.26 18 72.67 0 4

9 Amli 357 183 74.26 94 130.1 77 274.65 0 3

10 Mehrukhurd 177 90 43.95 51 77.43 36 109 0 0

Total 3499 1605 838.07 979 1365.4 825 2894.21 35 393.7 0



2.9 Agriculture - Agriculture is the prime occupation of livelihoods of the more than 80% of

population of project area. Discussion with farmers gives an impression that agriculture

production area is fluctuating and depends on the rains of the particular year. If we trust on the

community discussion, crops production was very less due to continuous droughts upnto year

2007. A large part of the village population is composed of small and marginal farmers with

subsistence agriculture, mainly for self sufficiency. The special feature of the project area is the

major area covered under cultivation under crops occupied by food grains and pulses. The

agriculture is alternated between two seasons of Kharif and Rabi. The major crops under Khraif

are Jowar, Bajra, Moong, Cotton and Maize which are in addition to hardy and less water

demanding. Wheat is the major crop of the project area and in addition to Gram, Mustard

Tarameera and Barley is the other crops cultivating in the project area.

Crop rotation of the project area is

Bajra - Wheat/Mustard

Bajra - Fallow

Moong- Mustard

Moong- Fallow

45.8

27.923.5

1

15.25

24.8

52.7

7.2

Marginal Small Medium Big

Analysis of Land category v/s Land Holding

Population (%) Land (%)



Focus group discussion (FGD) exercise was carried out with farmers to know about the area

sown under Kharif crops. The data of PRA shows that maximum area covered under Jowar and

Bajra, followed by Moong, Urad Cotton and Maize.

In the project area farmers of Sadara, Sadri and Mehrukalan also attracted towards cash crop of

Cotton, the project area increased up to 15% in project villages. Similarly farmers of Sadara

Sadri and Mehrulakan also attracted towards Castor crop , this crop was cultivated in a

significant area, production is very good but unfortunately rate were down and farmers also face

problem of market for this crop.

15%

38%15%

10%

6%16%

Sowing Pattern of Kharif Crops -Kadera, Alloli, Gothara

Bajra Jowar Moong

Urad Maize Others

10%

30%

5%5%

4%

36%

10%

Sowing Pattern- Kharif

Bajra Jowar Moong Urad

Maize Cotton Others

8%

31%

8%

4%4%

15%

15%

15%

Sowing Pattern-Kharif in Sadara & Mehrukalan

Bajra Jowar Moong Urad Maize Cotton Castor Others



Moong and Urad are the other crops cultivating in approximately 10-15% of the net sown area.

ALOLI and Deopura villages cover maximum area of urad and moong crop. Chilly was the key

crop of the Kadera gram panchyat area but its area is contniously decreasing from last eight to

ten years due to erratic and less rains

View of Castor crop

It was very difficult to get the area sown

under Rabi through PRA because community

informed that it is purely depend on the

availability of rains in the monsoon, time of

rains and availability of rains in winter

(Maawat). They reported that wheat area

increase if project area gets good rains and

also in winter (Maawat) but area under

Mustard and Gram increases if inadequate

rains find in project area. In season of more

than average rainfall, wheat is the first

choice of farmer otherwise they prefer to go with Mustard and Gram. They prefer wheat because

of good rate in market of wheat, self consumption and fulfillment of requirement of fodder. The

figure given below reveal the impression about sowing pattern of project area under rabi crops

20%

40%

30%

10%

Sowing Pattern Rabi- Low rains

Wheat Mustard Gram Other

35

30

25

20

Sowing Pattern Rab--Good rains

Wheat Mustard Gram Other



Table- 39 Detail of Cropping pattern of project area

Name of crop Main variety Yield (QT/Ha

KHARIF Crops

Jowar CSV-15 14

Bajra MH-179 HHB-67, Hyrid 14

Til TC-25 TC-46 7.5

Moong K-851 7.5

RABI crops

Wheat RAJ-3077, Raj-3777, LOKONE

25

Barley RD-2035 27

Gram C-235, RSG-888 23

Tarameera T-1 4

Mustard RGH-48, PUSA BOLD 4.5

Table- 40 Fertiliser Pattern Name of crops

Pesticides (Lt) Fertilizer(Kg/Ha)

Urea DAP Super phosphate

FYM(Ton /Ha)

Jowar Chloropyrophas 30 60

Bajra Chloropyrophas 30 60 20 ton /Ha

Maize 50

Til Thyram 5gm/ kg seed 30

Gram Rizobium Culture 60

Wheat FIR,Chloropyrophos 50 60 20 ton / Ha

Barlru Culture 50 60



Table- 41 Village wise cropped area

S.No Name of Villages Gross cropped area Double cropped area

Net sown area

1 Sadara 573 156 417

2 Sadari 487 203 284

3 ALOLI 562 159 403

4 Balapura 590 145 445

5 Nayagaon 445 109 336

6 Mehrukalan 1765 426 1339

7 Gothra 336 101 235

8 Deopura 84 20 64

9 Amli 60 14 46

10 Mehrukhurd 91 22 69

Total 4993 1355 3638

The data given in the table above shows the cropping intensity 137% in particular year however

it got down to 110 % in the years of low rainfall and increased up to maximum 140% in last one

decade.

PIA gathered the field idea about seed replacement rate of the project area. It is approximately

15% in wheat, 8% in Gram, 80-90% in Bajra, 80% in Mustard, 15 % in Maize and 20% in

Moong crops. Majority of farmers go with hybrid seeds in castor crop and Bajra

Soaf and Jeera are the other important spice crops cultivating in the project area. Soaf area

increased in case of good rains. Approximately 6-8% of the total area of Rabi covere under both

crops.



2.10 Inputs in agriculture

Seed, fertilizer and pesticides are the major production component responsible for the

productivity of any crop variety due to its inherent potential. WDT conducted PRA in the project

villages to find out the current status about input in agriculture. The key points of the FGD are

strongly demand to make necessary arrangement for smoothly and timely availability of inputs to

farmers at low cost.

Farmer are purchasing inputs from the near by market at Mehrukalan from the private supplier.

Three GSS is available in the project area at gram panchyat head quarter but not capable to fulfill

the requirement of all at peak time. It looks that project area farmers are more depend on private

suppliers for purchase of agriculture input and sell of fertiliser.

Looking to the scenario of seed replacement rate (SRR) for various crops in the project area,

which is more in bajra crop followed by cotton, wheat, gram, maize etc . There is scope for

increasing the SRR in all crops to provide the basket of varieties to widen the choice for farmers

to select the varieties suited to their requirement. The other aspect of seed management is the

Table -42 Productivity of main crops

S.No. Name of crop Area Yield(kg/ha)

1 Maize 337.00 1368 kg

2 Bajra 540.00 1510 kg

3 Jawar 2100.00 665 kg

4 Moong 1430.00 575 kg

5 Urid 210.00 575 kg

6 Til 445.00 300 kg

7 Wheat 740.00 2400 kg

8 Barley 315.00 2000 kg

9 Gram 570.00 690 kg

10 Mustared 1345.00 875 kg

11 Zera(Spice) 190.00 345 kg

12 Cotton 2800.00 2200 kg



timely availability of the seed to the growers so that they sow the crop in time with suitable

variety/hybrid rather than using the local seed material. Similarly, the quality of the seed

available with the traders is monitored regularly to avoid the possibility of the poor quality seed.

Farmer’s knowledge is reasonably fair on available hybrid seeds. He purchases the seeds from

the market which is provided by the local supplier. They are exploited by the local suppliers in

terms of rate and quality of seed. Farmers are not happy with the services of availability of seed

and fertilizer at time with the cooperatives. The stock available with the cooperatives and GSS is

very less as compare to demand of the area.

2.11 Farm Mechanization

The agriculture equipment industry is a key sector that contributes to agriculture growth and

productivity. Mechanized farming is modern scientific methods of cultivation. It improves

productivity and production of farm land and reduces cost of cultivation as also human drudgery

by facilitating efficient handling of agriculture operations. The status of project area in farm

mechanization is not very encouraging. Only big Farmers of project area have their own tractors

(71), seed drill and threshers in the project area. Majority of farmer’s specially small, marginal

and medium farmers around 80-85 % do not have their own farm equipments so they hire the

tractor with farm equipments whenever they require from the nearby areas or if available in the

same village. Farmers are attracting towards tractor drawn seed and fertilizer drill, thresher cum

harvester etc. It was analyzed that farmers spent approximately 12000-20000 on hire the farm

equipments for one ha of land in whole process

It looks that input cost of farmer is increase due to investment on purchasing farm equipments

and it could be reduce if farmers group manage the farm equipment at rotation basis so it is

proposed to provide the farm equipmens to the group of farmers.



Table- 43 Farm mechanization status

S.No Name of Villages Tractor Thresher Seeddrill Sprayer Cultivator

1 Sadara 12 4 12 12 10

2 Sadari 6 2 5 4 6

3 ALOLI 17 6 17 17 16

4 Balapura 3 1 3 3 3

5 Nayagaon 4 2 4 4 4

6 Mehrukalan 15 5 15 15 15

7 Gothra 4 1 4 3 3

8 Deopura 3 1 3 3 3

9 Amli, Mehrulhurd 7 2 7 6 7

Total 71 24 70 67 67

2.12 Livestock- Rajasthan state is at first position in number of animals and has the biggest share

of the animals 20% in the country. Livestock in Ajmer district occupies a prominent position

contributing significantly to the livelihood, mitigation of risks and distress of the farmers. In

Rajasthan where drought is a common phenomenon, livestock sector has been able to provide a

good coping mechanism and reduced vulnerability in the region which has been experiencing

drought like situation consecutively every two to three years

WDT team carried out the PRA in the project area to analysis the livestock position in the project

area. The few significant features found during the discussion are:-

23.3% of the total population of livestock belong to cow, followed by 15.54% buffalo,

31.50% goat, 24.57% sheep and 4.97% other animals. The data shows the project area

has 55 % of small ruminant of total animals and community attraction towards small

ruminates specially goat.



Progressive community of ALOLI watershed prefers Buffalo and remaining community

in favor of Cow in the project area. The reason behind the cow rearing is low demand of

fodder as compare to buffalo and buffalo has good percentage of fat which provide good

value of milk.

Large part of community members has desi breed cow and buffalo. Gir is the good

quality breed easily available and most preferred breed in the project area.

Parameters Desi Gir Cross Breed like HF/Jersy

Availability of fodder 4 3 1

Productivity 2 4 5

Immunity power 4 5 1

Fat percentage 2 4 2

Facilities available 4 3 1

The above table shows the ranking given by community on few certain aspects among basket of choice available. It

Clearly indicates that community prefer Gir in cow and Murrah in Buffalo

They preferred it due to high productivity, good looking and its capacity to adaptation to the

climate of the project area, resale value, high percentage of fat in milk which gives good value of

money and easily availablity in the nearby area.

Community prefer to adopt natural insemmination technique for breed improvement rather than

artificial insemmination however results of previous experiences for breed improvement done

by other agencies are not very encouraging. It was mainly due to lack of proper institution in the

area.

Commonly the small animals Goat and Sheep are reared by the poor and marginal farmers while

the large animals Cattle, Buffaloes etc. by the comparatively better ups. The farmers are

maintaining their livestock for drought purpose and getting negligible milk & meat products

from it. They are lacking in management, feeding, breeding and disease control measures. As a

result there is poor growth, non-descript offspring and huge mortality of animals/ birds due to

our breaks.



Table-44 Livestock detail Of Project Area

Name of villages Cow Buffalo Goat Sheep Others Total

Desi High breed

Desi High breed

Sadara 617 06 458 0 994 627 109 2811

Sadari 172 07 278 0 370 363 60 1250

ALOLI 850 06 472 0 613 414 115 2470

Balapura 215 15 108 0 318 225 40 921

Nayagaon 163 7 85 0 210 280 45 790

Mehrukalan 610 10 402 0 512 425 147 2106

Gothra 123 17 65 0 310 230 40 785

Deopura 100 10 70 0 290 280 46 796

Amli 80 10 65 0 275 235 35 700

Mehrukhurd 100 8 78 0 325 210 28 759

23.35

15.54

31.50

24.57

4.97

Livestock analysis of project area

Cow Buffalo Goat Sheep Others



Table- 45 Productivity of Cattle in project area

S.No Livestock Purpose Productivity (Year)

1 Cow –Deshi Milk , Bull 1.5-2 Lt

2 Cow-High breed Milk 8-10 Lt

3 Buffalo- Deshi Milk 4-5 Lt

4 Buffalo-High breed Milk 8-12 Lt

5 Goat Milk , Meat 0.5-1 Kg

6 Sheep Wool 1-1.5 Kg

At present many institutions like Saras, Ajmer dairy, Reliance, Kisan and Rajpurohit are the

main working in project area and collect the milk through their mobile vans. At present no BMC

is available at any dairy in the project area. Farmers sell more than 70-80 % of their production

to the dairy and earn the additional income. It is approximately 8000-10000 liter per day for

project area all around the year. There is vast untapped potential for enhance the livelihoods of

project communities through dairy.

The proposed activities for improve the productivity of the animal in livestock sector are

Breed improvement

Health camps

Demonstration of improve practices

Basic health facilities

Quality forage production

2.13 Fodder status

PIA organized focus group discussion in the project area to assess the fodder status in the village

because the secondary data was not available at village level to get know the idea of fodder. The

existing cultivable land for fodder is very less (less than 10%) in the project area and encroached

by dominat community. It is not significantly contributed for the milch animal however use for

small ruminates and unproductive cattles. It is not adequate to fulfill the demand of the



communities. Majority of family cultiv ating Jowar crop and also grow green fodder “Rijka “at

their field and use crops residue for the fodder. Green fodder is available only in months of

august to October in the pasture land otherwise dry fodder is available on common land. It was

revealed in the discussion that fodder status is depending on the monsoon. If rains are good then

project community have no problem regarding fodder and it is at surplus stage but in drought or

in condition of less rains , fodder availability is less and community face the problem.

Community demands the fodder from M.P, Kota and Bundi. In last ten years community faced

three- foure time’s problems for fodder availability during less years of rainfall.

Average rainfall full fill the demand, no need to importGood rainfall surplus fodder Drought deficit(30-40%) , purchase from outside

2.14 Drinking water status

The project area is quite unfortunate in terms of drinking water because Bisalpur drinking water

project which solve the drinking water problem of the a large part of Rajasthan but did not solve

the problem of local community . The main source of drinking water in the project area is public

supply point of the Bisalpur pipe line but water supply is available at interval of 72 to 96 hours

and still hamlets are not in reach of the PSP.

60%

32%

8%

Source of Fodder supply

Jowar Crop residue Green fodder



Open well is the important key and reliable source of drinking water for sweet water. Hand

pump is also important source of water but majority of handpump supply fluoride water and

tasteless water so community prefer

open well for drinking water.

During PRA, it was discussed that safe,

potable and assured drinking water in

all season is the biggest problem of the

project area. water become unsafe and

non hygienic after a certain depth in

such stages when water table is

gradually down so in season of summer, availability of drinking water is a big question for the

PIA.

Table- 46 Source available for Drinking water

Name of village Bore well Community well (Govt)

Hand pump Private Open well

Nadi/Pond

Sadara 5 2 9 23 2 Pond

Sadari 3 1 3 13 3 Nadi

ALOLI 1 6 12 20 3 Nadi3 Pond

Balapura 2 1 6 7 1 Nadi

Nayagaon 1 1 4 5 1 Nadi

Mehrukalan - 7 23 187 1 Pond River Khari

Gothra - - 24 32 1 Pond

Deopura - 2 6 52 1 Pond Khari River

Amli - - 7 23 1 Nadi

Mehrukhurd - 1 6 17 1 Nadi Khari River



2.15 Irrigation water sources - Ponds are the main sources of irrigation in the project area.

Mehrukalan gram panchyat is little fortunate compare to other gram panchyat. There are few

ponds available in the Mehrukalan gram panchyat and one anicut in the Khari rive. However

anicut has silted and commumity want to desilt it to increase the water storage capacity.

Well is first and prime important source of irrigation. The water table in the well is 20-25 meter.

The available irrigation sources are able to provide the ensure irrigation facility to 20 % of the

cultivable land however area is reach up to 25-30 % in good rains. The table given below gives

an impression about the available sources of irrigation.

Second important source is Anicut and Ponds also contributed to provide the facility of a small

part of the area. It is 5-8 % of the area. In project area irrigation through canal is also negligible.

In NREGA, many old structures proposed for renovation in the project area which certainly

enhance the irrigated area

2.16 Natural Calamities in project area – WDT members organized the PRA in the village and

discuss about the natural calamities in last ten years and its impact on the project villages in

Table –47 Available water bodies in project area

Project village Anicut Small water bodies

Nadi Big Pond

Sadara 3 2 3 1

Sadari - - 1 -

ALOLI 3 3 3

Balapura 4 - 1 1

Nayagaon 2 2 1 -

Mehrukalan 6 5 5 1

Gothra 2 - -

Deopura 2 - -

Amli 1 - 2 -

Mehrukhurd 2 - 1 -



terms of drinking water availability, livestock and agriculture. Data of last ten years data were

also collected to cross check the villager’s perception, analysis of data reveals the fact that 3

droughts have been faced by the project area i.e frequency of drought is once in thrice years. It

was informed by the community that changes in climatic condition have changed the frequency

of droughts in last decade. Climatic changes have increased frequency of extreme weather events

during past 15 years and raised the vulnerability and risk. There are several manifestations of

drought like late arrival of rains, early withdrawal, long break in between, lack of sufficient

water in reservoirs and drying up of wells leading to crop failure and even un-sowing of the

crops which ultimately curtail livelihood and may lead to migration.

Table – 48 Detail of natural calamities in last ten year

Year Status % of agriculture affected

% of livestock affected

% of household affected

Remarks

2002 Severe 30 45 50 Low rainfall, few rainy days with high intensity, acute drinking water problem

2004 Mild 40 40 50 Erratic and uncertain rainfall, drinking water problem, no source of irrigation in rabi crops

2009 Severe 80 80 85 Acute shortage of drinking water, irrigation source, fodder etc

2.17 Water Productivity

Water productivity is the key focus area in the common guidelines. At now, community is not

aware about the importance of drip and sprinkler irrigation system. They have a misconception

that micro irrigation especially drip irrigation is not suitable for project area the table given

below gives us an idea about the existing micro irrigation system. In current scenario, only 126

farmers have micro irrigation system however this number become more reduce if we talk about

adoptuion of this technology in field. In such condition use of micro irrigation technology help to



increase the more area under irrigation with same amount of water so there is need to motivate

the farmers towards micro irrigation.

It was revealed during discussion with agriculture and horticulture department officers that now

farmers are attract towards drip irrigation due to area increased under cotton crop. There is a lot

of untapped poteintial towards drip irrigation with horticulture orchard also.

Pond is the main source of irrigation in project area and water use efficiency is very low in

project area due to flood irrigation practices, water conveyance through kutcha water distribution

channel etc so there is a lot of scope for improves the water productivity with farmer friendly

technology.

2.18 Horticulture and Vegetables

Farmers in project area are mainly involved in traditional agriculture practices and believe in

food grain and pulses. They are hesitating to move towards crop diversification. In project area

communities mainly prefer citrus, papaya, ber, aonla and gonda for fruit cultivation. There is

Table-49 Detail of Micro Irrigation system in Project area

Name of villages No of drip No of sprinkler

Sadara 3 45

Sadari 2 5

ALOLI - 18

Balapura - 4

Nayagaon - 5

Mehrukalan - 10

Gothra 1 8

Deopura - -

Amli 3 10

Mehrukhurd - 2



better scope for mobilize the resources of NHM in the project area. The project area is highly

suitable in term of ecology for cultivation of fruits and vegetable cultivation.

The table presented here shows the impression that only 7 farmers of project area took initiate for

fruit cultivation and few progressive farmers are cultivating vegetable. In this project, PIA

developed the strategy to cover the area under crop diversification at large scale.

2.19 Common Property Resources - The project area has a good quantity (16%) of common

land which is either waste or cultivable but not use for cultivation now. The majority of people of

project area depend on the common property resources for their livelihood. Most of them

continue to live a virtually hand-to-mouth existence. The traditional pasture lands have been

rapidly depleting due to over-grazing and persistent drought-like conditions in the region .

Community is depending on these resources for their individual needs like fuel wood for cooking

Table- 50 Detail of project area on crop diversification Name of Villages No of farmers

for Fruit cultivation

Vegetable cultivation

No of farmers

Area

Sadara 3 50 12

Sadari 2 35 6

ALOLI 0 4 1

Balapura 0 1 0.50

Nayagaon 0 1 0.60

Mehrukalan 2 10 3

Gothra 0 1 0.25

Deopura 0 1 0.30

Amli 0 1 0.35

Mehrukhurd 0 2 0.50



and fodder for livestock and grazing of animals specially small ruminates. Common land in the

project area has many water bodies help to maintain the water table in the project villages.

Presently common pasture land has no use and degraded gradually. Village community uses this

land for only open grazing.

It is unfortunate that village community encroached a big part of the common land and few

dominated peoples do not want to free such land in favor of development of village. However

project community of few project villages the common land and encroachment.. Desi Babool,

Neem, Khejri, Ber are the most preferred plant by the community.

It is proposed to develop pasture land by agro forestry and grass land management because in

current scenario of climate change, this work help to improve soil fertility, reduce soil erosion,

reduce emission of GHG. In duration of two to three

years, huge production of grass would help the

problem of fodder in droughts and improve the milk

productivity due to nutritious feed management.

2.20 NREGA status – NREGA is the biggest

government scheme for rural development in the rural

development. Project area Gram Panchayat performs

significant progress in this scheme. They achieved the

target of registration of the needy family for work and

issued the job card. The detail of job card is given

below in the table. PIA is also the implementing

NREGA in the Kekri block and paying focus on

execution of many works could not cover under

watershed project.

Table- 51 Job card detail of project area S.No Name of

village Total no of job cards

1 Sadara 860

2 Sadari 404

3 ALOLI 799

4 Balapura 221

5 Nayagaon 343

6 Mehrukalan 1073

7 Gothra 273

8 Deopura 175

9 Amli 563

10 Mehrukhurd 206



2.21 Migration

Migration is the key problem of the project area. During discussion it was found that no work in

field in lean perio is the major reason for migration. Many families migrate to Kekri Jaipur,

Delhi and Ajmer in search of employment. They work there for

two to three months and come occasionally at home. Mines at

Sawar are also the key station for the local communities.

Migrated families involve mainly in construction work. In last

ten years, there were frequent mild and severe droughts

occurred in the project area so project communities depend on

agriculture mainly have no alternate source for livelihood in the

villages other than wages so one or two member from the

families migrate to the another place in search of employment .

NREGA helped the farmers to check the migration up to some

extent. It also help to increase the wages, now they get 250-300

for labor work and 400-450 for mason work in the near by

areas. Familes those work in near by farm house also get goo

wages in peak season.

2.22 Existing institutions – Promotion of existing institutions

is envisaged in the common guidelines so special efforts have been made to identify the existing

institution in the project area and pay special emphasis to strengthen the existing institutions so

that they can contribute for smooth execution of watershed project.

At now, two cooperatives are functioning in the project area but not able to fulfill the demand of

the project area for seed and fertilizer. 26 SHGs were formed by the ICDS but not functioning

now. Besides this many informal groups like youth club formed in the village, which are active

only at time of during festivals or for religious occasions. PIA would paying special attention to

strengthen the capacity and functioning of the institution and form into new group if feel

necessary.

Table-52 Status of Migration in project area

Name of Village

No of families

Sadara 56

Sadari 22

ALOLI 47

Balapura 10

Nayagaon 22

Mehrukalan 76

Gothra 10

Deopura 10

Amli 33

Mehrukhurd 12



Table- 53 Detail of existing institutions S.No Name of village SHGs Cooperative Dairy

cooperative 1 Sadara 9 1

2 Sadari 3 1

3 ALOLI 3 1 1

4 Balapura 2 1

5 Nayagaon 1 1

6 Mehrukalan 2 1 1

7 Gothra 2

8 Deopura 1

9 Amli/Mehrakhurd 2

2.23 Support and Extension facilities –Agriculture and livestock are the prime occupation of

the project area but the support and extension services are not very encouraging. Infrastructure

support in the project area is very poor. Farmers are fully dependent on the private local

suppliers for purchasing of input, services, sell of produces and vale addition available at

Mehrukalan and Kadera which is 3 to 4 km from the project area.. It reveals that facilities

available are comparataively better but not very supportive. They are also seeking for an outlet

centre equipped with facility of good quality of seed, fertilizer and pesticides available at time at

reasonable cost. Agriculture extension offices and veternery hospitals are available in the project

area but services are not adequate and available at time when needs to the community.



Table-54 Facilities available in project area

S.No Infrastructure Facility Place Distance

1 Agriculture Mandi Kekri 15

2 Agriculture input shop (private) Mehrukalan 2-6 Km

3 Agriculture Cooperative Mehrukalan 2

4 Local suppliers for purchase agriculture produce Mehrukalan 2

5 Seed supplier Mehrukalan 2

6 Pesticides , fertilizer supplier Mehrukalan 2

7 Storage facility Kekri 15

8 Cold storage Kekri 15

9 Nearest town Kekri 15

10 Nearest local market Kekri 15

11 Farm tool and equipment shop Kekri 15

12 Veterinary hospitals Mehrukalan 2-6

13 A.I facility Mehrukalan 2-6

14 Nearest local market for purchase of cattle Kekri



2.24 Water Budgeting - Water budgeting help us to understand the current position of available water, water requirement and deficit and surplus status of water. In present scenario in project area, all project villages are water deficit. This is because demand of water requirement of all project villages is more than the water available in the village.

WATER BUDGETING OF THE ALOLI WATERSHED

Total geographical area of Watershed 6207 Ha

Effective Area 6207 Ha

Rainfall of the Watershed area 550 mm

Proportion of estimated runoff to rainfall for 550 mm

Total mansoon rainfall

(a) Percentage of runoff to rainfallIn Good Catchment :- 17.30%In Average Catchment :- 12.90%

Area of watershedIn Good Catchment = x = 4539 Ha In Average Catchment = y = 1668 Ha In Bad Catchment = z = 0 Ha

Total Runoff available In Good catchment 4318858 cumIn Average catchment 1183446 cumIn Poor Catchment 0 cum

Total runoff available 5502304 cum



Present storage of the existing water bodies

S.No Water bodies No Storage capacity

1 Big Talab 3 300002 Anicut 4 140003 Nadi 17 170004 Small water bodies 26 13000

Total storage capacity of existing water bodies = 74000 cum

Following structures are proposed for retain the runoff in the project area

S.No Activity No Storage capacity (Cum)

1 MMS 38 114000

2 Khadin 168 168000

3 NADI 14 9800

4 Anicut 3 10500

5 Others 06 Total 302300

Total runoff trapped in existing & proposed structures=376300

% runoff trapped =6.83%



CHAPTER-3

Proposed Development Plan of ALOLI watershed project



Chapter-3

PLANNING OF ALOLI WATERSHED PROJECT

This chapter deals with the planning of ALOLI watershed project. As per envisaged in the

common guidelines, the ALOLI watershed project is classified into the three project phases. In

view of the expanded scope and expectations under the watershed development program, the

project duration could be in the range of four to seven years depending upon the activities of the

watershed project. In ALOLI watershed project, it is designed for maximum six years. However

implementation period is vary gram panchyat to gram panchyat , it is proposed for two years for

three gram panchyats have limited funds to save the administration cost of the project,

implementation period is proposed for maximum 3 ¼ years for mehrukalan gram panchyat.

Consolidation phase is for 9 months which is equal for all gram panchyats

3.1 Project Period- Six Years (2010-11 to 2015-16)

Phases Duration

Preparatory phase 2 Year

Works Phase 3 Years and Three months

Consolidation and Withdrawal phase 9 Months

Table-56 Proposed period of Gram panchyats

Gram Panchyat Prepratory Phase

Implemntation Phase Consolidation

Years 1 2 3 4 5 5 1/4 6 Years MehruKalan ALOLIGordhaSadaraKaderaPiplaj



3.2 Capacity Building

PIA would provide key focus on the capacity building of various stakeholders in whole phase of

the watershed project to build their conceptual, managerial, analytical, technical and operational

capabilities. PIA believes that Capacity building is the key mechanism to introduce participatory

approaches for planning, implementation and management of watershed activities. A series of

training program would be organized for various stakeholders according to changing perspective.

Special focus would be provided on follow up of each training program to measure the

effectiveness and change in degree of organizational and attitudinal change.

Table -57 CAPACITY BUILDING PLAN

S.N STAKEHOLDERS

Total No Participants covered

No of Days

No of Trainings

Rate Amount

1 PRIs

District level 30 20 1 1 450 9000

Block Level 27 40 1 1 300 12000

GP level 45 220 1 6 150 198000

2 WDT 4 4 2 3 500 12000

4 4 3 2 500 12000

4 4 1 6 150 3600

3 SHGs 380 300 1 6 150 270000

300 2 3 250 450000

300 3 2 300 540000

4 UG 200 200 1 5 150 150000

5 Farmers 405 780 1 1 150 117000

6 WC members 60 1 5 150 45000

60 2 2 300 72000

60 3 1 300 54000



7 Exposure

Combined common exposure 365000

SHGs 55000

UG 42000

WC 40000

8 Slogan writing, Display writing 115000

9 IEC 102000

10 Capacity building of the Individuals 55000

Grand Total 2718600

Fund Management

Manage by PIA 2718600Manage by DWDC 968000Manage by SLNA 37240Grand Total 3723840

Rs Thirty Seven Lakhs twenty three thousands eight hundred fourty only

The proposed training program would be organized for one day, two day and for three day only

in field of agriculture, livestock , soil & water conservation, institutional development (SHGs

and UGs related subject), ITK , record keeping etc . PIA has also identified resource institutions

and constituted a panel for this particular project. The pedagogy of the training program would

be used as per suitable to target group. Special training programs in field will arrange for farmer

and volunteers in the project area.



CapacityBuilding

Orientation Program

Field Training

Technical Training

Exposure Advance training

Sangosthi

Subject specfic training





Table -58 PANEL OF RESOURCE INSTITUTIONS

S.NO Name of Institution Address Area of Expertise

1 Krishi Vighyan Kendra, Ajmer Ajmer Agriculture Technology and Management

2 Central Spice Tabiji Pulses

3 Agriculture Research station Tabiji Agriculture Technology and Management

4 Panchyat Training Center Ajmer grass root level training

5 Deputy Director, Veterniry department Ajmer Livestock Management , Dairy

6 ARAVALI-NGO Ajmer Livelihoods

7 Agriculture Department Agriculture Technology and Management

8 State Institute of Agriculture Management Jaipur Agriculture Technology and Management

9 M.R. Morarka-NGO Ajmer SHG/UG

10 Mayajan -NGO Dausa Institutional development

11 BAIF Ajmer Livestock Management

12 CTAE Udaipur Soil and Water conservation

13 CAZRI Jodhpur Agriculture Technology and Management

3.3 Entry Point Activity (EPA) - after establish a reasonably enabling environment; EPA was

taken by the PIA. The key purpose of EPA is to establish credibility of the WDT and establish a

rapport with the village community. It also helps in developing the enabling environment in the

project area and to assess the community strengths. EPA also give us the opportunity to test the

community on check on non negotiable.

PIA has organized many meetings in a series at regular interval in the project villages. Senior

officers from Jila Parishad and Panchayat samiti also attended the few meetings. After establish a

rapport building PIA organized gram sabha in each gram Panchayat for constitution of WC and

selection of EPA. Communities identified the works that were most important for whole



community. Till writing of DPR majority of works near to complete, remaining works started

and in process and yet to be started.

Table- 59 Detail of Gram Sabha for EPAs S.No Name of Gram Panchayat Dates of Gram Sabha

1 Aloli 31/5/2011

2 Mehra Kalan 2/6/2011

3 Sadara 2/6/2011

4 Kadera 7/6/2011

5 Goardha 6/7/2011

6 Piplaj 11/6/2011

Table- 60 Detail of EPAs S.No Name of

Villages Name of EPA No of

activities Sanction cost

Status

1 Sadara 1. Community Platform 2. Boundary wall at common

place

2 1.254.99

ongoingcomplete

2 ALOLI1. Vishram Stahali2. Boundary wall of funeral

place

2 2.5 ongoing

3 Balapura Hathai construction 1 0.50 ongoing

4 Mehrukalan 1. Baramada in school2. Platform at funeral place3. To be decided 4. House for domestic waste5. Safety wall at common

place

5 1.954.07.50.81.60

completedongoing -ongoing ongoing

5 Gothra Platform for community 1 1.25 ongoing

6 Deopura Platform for community 1 0.50 ongoing

7 Amli Hathai construction 1 0.60 ongoing



GLIMPSES OF EPA IN PROJECT AREA



3.4 Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) -

In the common guidelines, more emphasize is given to ensure community participation at every

stage of the project. Guidelines also provide community participation at the centre of the project

and specially mentioned about to ensure the involvement of the backward community, small and

marginal famers, land less and women in the planning stage.

WDT team carried out the household

survey in the village with involvement of

youth of project villages. The household

format contains the socio –economic data

of the individual family. PRA tools like

resource mapping, transect walk, focus

group discussion (FGD), community

problem analysis (CPA), ranking , semi

structured interview and time line were

used by the WDT members to know about

livelihoods of village, available resources

in the project area, main problems, their

analysis and optimal solution to resolve the

problem.

The WDT members conducted specific

sector wise analysis to analysis the situation in agriculture and animal husbandry sector. PRA

conducted in the village help to develop the SWOC analysis of the key sub sector of watershed

program.

Table-61 Detail of PRAs

S.No Name of Villages Name of PRA

1 Sadara 03.06.2011

2 Sadari 07.06.2011

3 ALOLI 02.06.2011

4 Balapura 06.06.2011

5 Nayagaon 05.06.2011

6 Mehrukalan 04.06.2011

7 Gothra 08.06.2011

8 Deopura 09.06.2011

9 Amli/Mehrakhurd 10.06.2011

10 Sadara 11.06.2011



Few Glimpses of PRA in project area



3.5 Livelihood Analysis- PIA team paid special emphasis on livelihood analysis of the project

area and gather information to understand the all five capitals and its existence status in the

project area. PIA also develops understanding on the vulnerability issues of the project area

especially with reference to agriculture and livestock.

WDT team carried out the PRA in the project area to identify the income sources of livelihoods

of the project communities. The analysis of data reveals that agriculture is the prime source of

income followed by wage in village or outside areas. Approximately more than 70 % of the

population is workforce in the project area. Communities those have rain fed land have engaged

in more than one occupation for their livelihoods. They engage in agriculture for six- seven

months and remaining time wage in agriculture or non farming sector is the key occupation of

such community.

The analysis of FGD conducted with the community gives this impression about the livelihoods

of project area.

Farmers those only depend on

agriculture and animal husbandry for

their livelihoods

Progressive farmers have good land

holding , irrigation facility and high

breed cattle

30-35 %

Farmers those prime occupation is

agriculture but wage is also an important

source in lean period

Farmers those have un irrigated land

and work on other farmers land, with

government schemes, near by area etc

in lean period

45-50%

Community depend only on wage for

livelihoods

halt at place for maximum period or on

daily basis

5-10 %

Migrated to other place comes

occasionally

driver, involve in construction work etc

at other place

hardly

1-2%

Self employment i.e shop, self business

etc

3-4 %

Service with private /government 1%

others 5%



WDT team also conducted a FGD discussion and facilitates the community to give the marking

in the existing status of the livelihood capitals on all the five capitals. Firstly all the livelihood

capitals were described them in detail and then facilitated the process through marking the

process from maximum out of five.

Capital Key attributes Factors

Human Capital Skill, knowledge, ability to labor, awareness

lack of knowledge about modern technology and good practices in integrating farming sector, no indigenous skill found in project area

Social Capital Network, institutions, liaison limited liaison, linkages and networking

Physical Capital Infrastructure, asset with family

assets available with community is reasonably good as compare to rural areas

Financial capital Source of income, indebt ness in project area

majority of farmers belong to small and medium category , have income to fulfill the requirement of the family

Natural capital Land, Water, Forest, CPR, vegetation etc

low water table, degraded land, good quality of land with good soil health, suitable agro climate

5 5 5 5 5

2 1.8 2 21.75

Social Capital Human capital Financial Capital Physical Capital Natural capital

Analysis of Livelihood Capital



3.6 Gram Panchayat wise proposed budget

ActivityBudget (Rs in Lakhs )

Total CostALOLI SADARA MEHRUKALAN KADERA PIPLAJ GOTHRA

Admn. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Monitoring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00EPA 4.14 6.13 15.72 0.48 2.09 1.23 29.79I & CB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00DPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00WORKS 0.00Natural Resource Management 57.94 85.84 220.09 6.72 29.31 17.25 417.15

Arable Land Development 42.48 67.60 161.66 4.64 22.68 14.54 313.60Non Arable Land Development 11.54 13.21 31.45 1.30 4.58 1.93 64.01Drainage Line Treatment 3.92 5.03 26.98 0.78 2.05 0.78 39.54Productivity Enhancement 10.39 15.34 39.32 1.25 5.24 3.07 74.61

Livelihood Enhancement 9.34 13.75 35.3 1.04 4.7 2.71 66.84Consoldation phase 2.69 3.98 10.22 0.31 1.36 0.80 19.36

3.7 Scientific Planning- special efforts made by the Directorate WD & SC , Jaipur Rajasthan to

use GIS and remote sensing in the watershed planning and monitoring. Directorate, WD & SC

made collaboration with the PDCORE organization for developing six thematic maps for

watershed projects sanctioned under IWMP in the Rajasthan. The images of maps are enclosed

with this report in chapter -8.

PDCORE was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and

LISS-3 imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting

present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under

different ownerships at village level



The five maps developed by the remote application centre are

1. Base Map- This map developed on the sale of 1: 15,000 and has information regarding drainage

line, cadastral boundary, micro watershed boundary and settlement.

2. Land Use and Land Cover Map- This map have the information of the present land use and

land cover of the project villages of the ALOLI watershed project.

3. Contour Map- the third map is the contour map at 20 m interval

4. Slope Map

5. L Section

6. Key map of drainage and water bodies



CHAPTER-4

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN



Chapter-4

Proposed Development Plan

4.1 Introduction

Watershed work is the important component of the watershed project. 75 % of the total project

cost is allocated for the execution of works. Now, watershed project is looked as holistic approach

for development of village so all component is covered in the watershed project. The proposed

works are classified into three important components as per envisaged in the common guidelines.

1. Soil and Water Conservation works

2. Productivity Enhancement

3. Livelihood Enhancement

4.2 Soil and Water Conservation Works. This is the core component of the IWMP watershed

project. 56 % of the total project cost is allocated for this part. Two types of work are covered

under this component. It can be classified into

1. Physical measures

2. Vegetative and Agronomic measures

In the detail project report of IWMP, This component is again divided into three sub component

i.e

A) Arable land development- The proposed works for treatment of private cultivable land is

covered under arable land treatment. Earthen bund and Khadin are the key example.

B) Non arable land development – the proposed works for treatment of non arable land or common

waste land or non cultivable area is covered under this component. Pasture land development is

the key example.

C) Drainage line treatment- The works proposed in the drainage line (streams) of the project area

is called drainage line treatment. Masonry check dam is the key example

The key purposes of the various measures are

a. To check the erosive velocity of water to reduce the soil erosion in project area



b. To conserve the water for more time in the project village to promote the recharge phenomena.

c. To provide the irrigation facility in rabi season and life saving irrigation in Kharif season also

d. To cover area under vegetation, agro forestry and plantation to develop eco friendly

environment

e. To reduce the erosion and conserve insitu moisture in the field

4.3 Arable Land Treatment- Three types of measures have been identified through following

participatory approaches and discussion with community for arable land development.

Earthen Bund- This is the most popular soil conservation structure in the country and it is

practiced at large scale all over India. The other name of earthen bund as CVH. It would lie along

the boundary of the field. Land holding in the project area is very small and it is not possible or

feasible to construct contour bund or graded bund in the field. The earthen bund is divided into

three types on the basis of the slope of the land and size of field. It is suitable for project area

because rainfall is low than 600 mm and soil is favorable. It would help in conserve the water in

the field and maintain insitu moisture of the field. The erosion of the field is reduced. The waste

weir in the field helps to safely disposal of the excess water from the field.

Land records data give us an impression that project communities have land holding from 0.4 ha

to 6 ha. Slope of more than 50 % area is 1% and followed by 1 -3 % range. WDT team also

analysis the rainfall pattern and rainfall intensity of the project area. The design and proposed

cross section is enclosed in the design of the earthen bund.

Type of

Earthen Bund

Specification Unit cost

(per ha in Lakhs)

Area Proposed

(Ha)

Type-I 1 % slope 0.15 560.5

Type-II for more than 2 % slope 0.20 260.5

Type-III more than 1 less than 3%slope 0.22 85



Farm Pond – This structure is constructed where topography of the project area does not lend

itself to embankment construction, dugout or excavated pond can be constructed. This is

relatively flat area. Since dugout pond can be constructed to expose a minimum water surface area

in proportion to volume so they are advantageous where evaporation losses are high and water is

scarce. However in context to project area, the farm pond is proposed in the flat land to conserve

the rainwater as much as possible in the field.

Sites proposed for farm pond are the place which is at highest natural depression of the field. If

site is demanding, then diversion ditch would construct to divert the flow of water towards farm

pond. The shape of the farm pond is rectangular and size of the pond depend on the land holding

of the farmer, demand of water of farmer , soil type, rainfall pattern and catchment area for

proposed farm pond. The proposed cost of the farm pond from the project is 32 thousands

maximum for pond. Remaining cost would contribute from the farmer in case of more

investment. Total 13 farm ponds proposed in the action plan.

Khadin – A Khadin is an embankment constructed in the farmer field to retain water in the field.

It is made up from the soil available in the farmer field. The key purpose of the Khadin in this

project is to conserve the water in the project area to increase the water table. The available

moisture in the field also helps to get good crop in the Rabi season also. The Khadin design could

Top width Bottom Width Corner A

Corner C Corner D Corner B

Plan of Dugout Pond

7.50 m

7.5

0

m

15m

15

m

c



vary according to length and height of the structure. In this particular project five type of Khadin

is proposed however it may vary according to field condition

Type Unit cost Total structures

Type-I 0.60 90Type-II 0.90 48Type-III 1.50 23Type-IV 2.0 7

Land Reclamation – This activity is proposed for treatment of such lands which are uncultivable

at present time and can be include under category of cultivable with little bit efforts. Private waste

land would be included in this category. Activities like cover the field with good quality silt

application, gypsum application, leveling, clean the surface from stone etc would be plan however

it would depend finally on demand of the field. Then same field would cover under agro forestry

and horticulture plantation or any other cultivation suitable to field to existing climate. The

maximum investment for reclamation of field for one farmer is 30 thousands. Beneficiary would

motivate for contribution for additional cost. This activity will help to increase the area under

cultivation.

4.4 Non Arable Land Development – The various SWC treatment measures proposed for

development of non arable land of project area are described below

Intergrated Agro Forestry and Pasture Development Model- This activity is planned under

non arable land development and planned for common land of project area. Which is cover under

class V to VIII and not suitable for cultivation. Pasture land is encroached and not ready to free

the land so PIA would deal this issue in future. At this junction it is proposed to develop 8.5 ha

land for implementation of this model. The proposed activities for this model are listed below

1. Contour trenches (Continuous or staggered trench ) to conserve moisture in the field and to reduce

the erosion

2. Agro forestry plantation of the suitable tree species to develop eco environment and sink carbon

in the soil and solve the fuel problem in long term. Suitable tree like Desi Babool, Neem,

Sheeshum, Bans etc would be planted.



3. Grass land management- Choice of suitable grass to the area and it’s over seeding. To save from

erosion and provide the fodder to the village livestock during critical time.

4. Fencing – ditch cum bund fencing or stone fencing is required. However social fencing concept

will also adopted for successful pasture program.

5. Structures like gully plug, LSCD , Nala bund to reduce and check the velocity of water and

conserve the water to maintain moisture in the field

6. Structure like Nadi for storage of water

7. If needed minor masonry water tank to provide the water for plantation in critical period.

8. Horticulture plantation in the patch of the area

If PIA would not feel confident to cover the area for the above activity in a holistic manner than

individual activity would be implement in the non arable area like agro forestry, road side

plantation, horticulture orchard, trenches, CVH and Nadi etc

Nadi- It is one of the most common earthen structures constructed in the common land to store

the runoff. The earthen embankment is proposed of shape of half circular at suitable sites in the

common land. The height of the structure would be from 0.75 m to 2 meter. The length of the

Nadi would be as per need of the sites but it is approximately between 60 to 180 meter and

reduces and extends accordingly. Total 14 Nadi structures are proposed to intercept the runoff and

conserve the water in ground for three types of Nadi.

Agro Forestry Plantation- Few patches in the project area on common land would develop as

agro forestry plantation. The propose size of work is 16 ha. The plants suitable to project area like

Sheeshum, Neem, Desi Babool, Bamoboo, Khejri would be planted.

Botanical Park- It is proposed to develop 4 parks nearby temple or any public place where whole

community village will agreed. The tentative area of the park would be around 0.5 to 1 Ha. In the

park, activities like grass land, trenches, nursery, fencing, plantation, medicinal plantation and

flower cultivation would be proposed.

4.5 Drainage Line Treatment – This is the most important component of the works. However, in

project area, there are deep drainage line are found only in few villages due to comparatively

gentle slope. WDT technical carried out the technical survey L section of the important drainage



line and identified the important sites for the masonry check dam. Cross section of every

individual site has been carried out and design and estimate prepared accordingly.

Loose Stone Check Dam (LSCD) – This is the structured construct in the drain of the project

area to check the velocity of the water. This structure can be constructing from the available fair

size stone. This is dry stone masonry structure so workman ship of the work is very important.

This is the structure which is very important for the gully which is steep and broad. The size and

shape of the LSCD is depending on the condition of gully and size of available stone. These

structures are built in series in the drain and distance between two consecutive structures depends

on the grade of the drain.

ANICUT – This is weir structure construct in the big drain for control of the gully. It is a

permanent structure and the main purpose of this structure is to provide the irrigation to the

farmer’s field. Few structures which have already constructed earlier but not functioning well due

to need of repair and maintenance, also proposed in the action plan. L section and Cross section

survey of the selected location has been carried out. Technical design with four stability checks

prepared for each masonry structures. Map prepared by PD-CORE used for identification of sites.

Total eight structures identified.

Minor Masonry structure – This is the small weir structure constructed across the nala in the

low catchment area. In this structure, only head wall and extension wall along with apron is

constructed. The structure is suitable only in low catchment area and height up to 1.2 m. These

structures are proposed in second and third stream nalla with minor modification of the design of

anicut. Total 38 structures identified for this project.

4.6 Productivity Enhancement - This is the second most important component of the watershed

project. The key purpose of this component is to enhance the productivity of integrated Farming

System. This system comprises of Agriculture, Horticulture, Vegetable, Animal Husbandry, Dairy

etc in our project area.

The key objectives of the productivity enhancement component are

1) More income from farming system in limited land holding



2) Optimum use of available resources with farmer for more income

3) Assured income for long term

4) Productivity enhancement

5) Awareness on crop diversification

6) Water productivity

Participatory Varietal Selection- This activity is proposed in the project area with the purpose

to make the project area self seed reliance and achieve seed security. Farmer will develop the

suitable seed of the certified variety in their own field in close observation of the WDT member’s

team. It will help in increase the area of local specific breeding seed and increases the SRR of the

main crops. The demonstration of crops like Moong, Maize, Jowar, Bajra, Gram and wheat would

be distribute for size of 0.4 ha per farmer. The cost of per demonstration is five thousands only.

Total 389 demonstrations proposed to this project.

Farm Mechanization- The key purpose of this activity is to aware the farmers about the improve

and modern tools in the agriculture to save their time, and improve efficiency. Few equipments

seed cum fertilizer drill, reaper, plough, thresher etc would be provide in a group to show the

importance of the improve quality of farm equipment to increases the productivity of the

agriculture and to save the input cost of the agriculture. The proposed cost of farm equipment per

demonstration is 1.0 lakhs and 0.50 lakhs for plant protection equipment.

Orchard Cultivation – The key purpose of this model is to attract project farmers towards

horticulture cultivation so few farmers those fulfill the criteria for successful model would be

selected for demonstration of horticulture orchard. This is a model in 1 to 2 acre area depend on

the availability of land holding with the farmer. Drip irrigation is proposed in the model and all

other necessary inputs will also give with the plants along with latest improve technology. The

selection of species of fruits would be mutually decided along with support from horticulture

department. As per norms of the common guidelines maximum support to farmer is 24,000 for

this purpose. Orchards like Papaya, Pomegranate, Leamon, Awla and Orange etc are suitable for

the area. 28 farmers would get the benefit from the project.

Kitchen Gardening- in this activity, it is proposed to distribute hybrid vegetable seeds to the

women of the house to grow nearby kitchen house. Protection of plant is the responsibility of the

owner of the house. Total 161 is proposed to this project. The key purpose of this model is to

motivate the farmers to grow vegetable in a small patch of their area



Medicinal Cultivation- Few demonstrations in the project area would develop on the farmer’s

field as well as community land to promote medicinal cultivation. Demonstration of

Aashwagandha, alovera, Safed musli etc would be develop in the project area with the farmers

those have additional land additional to routine cultivation. The proposed cost for per

demonstration from project cost is Rs 5000/- per demonstration.

Flower cultivation – It is also proposed to develop some demonstration of flower suitable to

agriclimate of the project area. Ajmer is famous for flower cultivation and set mechanism is

available for marketing so it could be a good opportunity for farmers.

Vermi compost: Vermi compost is organic manure (bio fertilizer) produced as the vermin

compost by earth worm biological waste material; plant residues. This compost is an odorless,

clean, organic material containing adequate quantities of N,P,K, and several micronutrients

essential for plant growth. Vermi compost is a preferred nutrient source for organic farming. It is

eco-friendly, non-toxic, consumes low energy input for composting and is a recycled biological

product. A maximum support of 20,000 would be provided from the project for shed house.

Approximately 10-12 units would be install within the shed.

4.7 Livestock Management-

Primary health camps – In the villages in the season with collaboration of veterinary department

Establish A.I units in the project area with necessary equipment like container, arrangement of

semen and needle. A young para professional would be trained for intensive training of 3 to 6

months with BAIF.

Provision of Improve Breed Cattle- Murrah for buffalo and Gir for Cow

Demonstration showing about nutritious and improve feeding practices of feed of Milch animal

Demonstration of improve forage crops

Construction of Pashu Naad for improve feeding practice of management

One model in each project village with one farmer who is progressive and have a number of milch

animal.

Establish Travis in project villages for treatment of cattle

4.8 Livelihood Enhancement - This is third most important component of the IWMP watershed

project. This component aims to maximize the utilization of potential generated by watershed



activities and creation of sustainable livelihoods and enhanced incomes for households within the

watershed area. This will facilitate inclusiveness through enhanced livelihood opportunities for

the poor through investment into assets, improvements in productivity and income, and access of

the poor to common resources and benefits and augment the livelihood strategy at household

level. It is envisaged in the guidelines that members of these families should become the member

of SHGs and these SHGs will prepare the livelihood action plan for the livelihood enhancement

of the SHGs members in a long term manner. The propose activities of the SHGs could be both in

farm sector or non farm sector.

In the project area many activities are suggested for the livelihood enhancement of the poor

families of the project area. It would certainly help in increase in their annual income and

generate additional fund to the family.

SHGs can undertake any permissible activity jointly as a group or the group may decide to

support individual(s) for the activities under the umbrella of the main SHG. In case of individual

support under the SHGs, the individuals will be accountable to the main SHG for finances and

performance. The support from the livelihood enhancement component would be given in two

ways

1. grant in aid – 30 % of the fund

2. revolving fund /seed money – 70 % of the fund



4.9 Special projects

PIA developed few ideas on the basis of discussion. The proposed special projects for the

livelihood enhancement manage by SHGs and federations are given below.

Seed Bank-

The concept of ‘village based seed bank’, (VBSB) which advocates village self-sufficiency in

production and distribution of quality seeds, is fast gaining ground. Many attempts are on to

revive the age-old concept of seed self-sufficiency. Seed villages or village seed banks operate

with utmost transparency, mutual trust and social responsibility of the seed farmer towards his

fellow farmers, and under peer supervision. Though this is not an entirely new concept to

villagers, it is being promoted to reduce their dependence on external inputs.

SHGs would Implementing the seed village concept in project villages started with

reconnaissance survey undertake to assess the ground situation and ascertain the demand for

seeds and understand the existing seed systems.

Steps of Seed Bank is –

1) Distributing breeder/founder seed to the farmers under participatory crop varietal selection of

different crops varieties to the interested farmers by following participatory approaches in

facilitation of the organization.

Key stake holders

SHGs member

SHG federation

Individual entrepreuner

Any poorer family belong

to project area



2) Selection of variety of seed bank after assessing the result and participatory discussion with the

farmers.

3) Selection of voluntary farmers willing to part of the seed bank SHGs

4) On farm training on Seed production techniques , INM,IPM, soil health and other issues

5) Seed production of selected different crops varieties

6) Procurement by the SHGs

7) Distributing to the other interested farmers

8) Certification process of seed in second year

9) Storage of seed at right place

10)Marketing of seed after consumption at village level

11)Multiplication of seed

12)Self reliance seed village

Expected Benefits-

Availability of improved varieties seed in sufficient quantity within the village.

Assured and timely supply of seed.

Decentralized seed production

Availability of improved variety seed at low price

Improved seed delivery system to resource-poor farmers

Reduced dependence on external seed sources and hence an effective measure to curb spurious

seed trade

Individual Farmer

Seed Production

Seed Storage

Seed Distribution



Encourages village level trade and improves village economy

Scope for farmers participatory varietal selection

Breed Improvement –

Introduction - India has a very rich reservoir of genetic diversity and possesses some of the best

breeds of cattle and buffaloes in the world. The country’s population of 218.8 cattle accounts for

17% of the total world population of cattle. In this age of competitive world, a family cannot meet

all its requirements from a sole occupation like agriculture which is almost a loss-making

enterprise at the present context. Small land holding famers land in rainfed condition does not

provide the opportunity to the farmer to get good income from the agriculture. In such context, it

is necessary to provide subsidiary source of income sources of income generation to the peasant

communities which are complementary to agriculture and easy to manage without many

technicalities.

Dairy could be considered as a viable Income Generation Activity (IGA) for the project area but

in present time productivity of the animal is comparatively low and farmers knowledge and

practice of livestock management is not very encouraging. In project area almost every farmer has

cattle but majority of cattle population is desi so breed improvement in the project area will

surely help in improve the productivity result in enhance of income of the family so in the

watershed project, it is proposed to provide one Cow of Gir and One Buffalo of Murrah breed to

the SHG.

Objectives

Improve the milk productivity

Improve the feeding practices of livestock management.

Generate the additional source of income in the family

SHG would be fully responsible for the management of the project. SHG would identify the one

experience member from the village for look after of the milch animal. He would invest the

money on cattle rearing and charge for the cross breed of their local indigenous low yield animal

mutually decide in the SHG meeting from the village community. The resulting



upgraded/crossbred progeny with an improved genetic make up will have better milk yielding

capacity. One Integrated Livestock Development Centre at one gram Panchayat head quarter

covers all the 17 villages () falling within an area of 15 - 18 Kms from its location. One

programme operator, called 'Gopal' is posted at each of these centers.

To ensure the success of this programme, mass castration camps will organized in all the

villages to castrate the local stray bulls in order to avoid indiscriminate breeding.



CHAPTER-5

WATERSHED TREATMENT PLAN OF ALOLI

WATERSHED PROJECT



Chapter 5

WATERSHED TREATMENT PLAN

5.1 Introduction

This is the most important chapter of the DPR descrbing about the watershed treatment plan of

the project and proposed physical and financial target of the project. The unit of action plan is at

gram panchyat as envisaged in the guidline and instructed by SLNA. PIA is taking care to

develop the plan after adopting latest change in the percentage wise allocation of budget.

The watershed project sanction year is 2010-11 however treatment plan is prepared for five years

i.e 2010-11 to 2015-16. Implementation phase is planned for only three years i.e from year 2012-

13 to 2014-15 and a part of 2015-16 is proposed for mehrukalan and same financial year is

proposed for consolidation phase. Gram panchyat wise action plan of works component has

developed only for three years.

41.85

198.30

322.16

121.35

44.58

15.00

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Year wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)



The proposed figure mention below shows the year wise expenditure in each component. The

plan is prepared as per norms envisaged in the common guidelines. First two year is planned for

preparatory phase, followed by three years and three month for works and last nine months for

consolidation phase. Year 2013-14 is the most important year for the project because maximum

fund is proposed for this year. 43.25% of the total fund is proposed for this year.

The figure mentioned above describe about the expenditure on each component. It has classified

as 75 % in works, 10% in administration, 5% in capacity building, 4% in EPA, 1% each in

monitoring, evaluation and DPR and 3 % in consolidation phase

5.62

26.62

43.25

16.29

5.99 2.01

Year wise proposed budget (in %)

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

10% 5%

4%

75%

1% 3% 1%1%

Percentage allocation of Budget

Adminstration Capacity Building EPA Works

DPR Preparation Consolidation Phase Monitoring Evaluation



The above budget is classified according to the norms of the common guidelines. Maximum budget 84.6% is allocated to the watershed committee and minimum 1.35% to the SLNA.

74.48 37.24 29.79

558.60

7.45 22.34 7.45 7.450.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

Component wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)

10.05 11.92

92.71

630.06

SLNA DWDC PIA WC

Stakeholders wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)



.

1.35 1.60

12.45

84.59

Stakeholders wise budget (in %)

SLNA DWDC PIA WC

85.84

57.94

220.09

29.3117.25

6.7215.34 10.39

39.32

5.24 3.07 1.2513.75 9.34

35.30

4.70 2.71 1.04

Sadara Alloli Mehrukalan Piplaj Gordha Kadera

Component wise budget

NRM PE LE



Convergence – PIA would make sincere efforts for holistic development of the project area so

PIA would do dedicated efforts to convergence with the various departments like agriculture

department, horticulture department and NREGA. PIA also doing efforts to get the support from

health department, social and welfare department, TSC, Dairy etc

S.N

Activities Unit Unit Cost

ALOLI Mehrukalan Kadera

No Amount No Amount No Amount

NREGA

1 Earthen Bund Ha 0.21 30 6.3 50 10.5 5 1.05

2 NadI Nos 3.0 4 12 6 18 2 6

3 Renovation of structure

Nos 3.0 1 3 2 6 0 0

4 Apna Khet Apna Kam

Nos 1.0 5 5 10 10 2 2

26.3 44.5 9.05

Horticulture department

1 Horticulture Orchard

Nos 0.42 2 0.84 4 1.68 1 0.42

2 Drip irrigation set

Nos 0.45 2 0.9 4 1.8 1 0.45

3 Sprinklar irrigation set

Nos 0.5 2 1 2 1 1 0.5

4 Hybrid Vegetable

Nos 0.05 2 0.1 5 0.25 1 0.05

Agriculture department

2.84 4.73 1.42

1 Crops demonstration

0.02 6 0.12 10 0.2 2 0.04

2 farm pond 0.55 1 0.55 2 1.1 1 0.55

3 soil testing 400 0.2 500 0.25 0

0.87 1.55 0.59

Grand Total 30.01 50.70 11.06



S.N

Activities Unit Unit Cost

Sadara Gothara Piplaj

No Amount No Amount No Amount

NREGA

1 Earthen Bund Ha 0.21 30 6.3 10 2.1 0 0

2 NadI Nos 3.0 4 12 2 6 0 0

3 Renovation of structure

Nos 3.0 1 3 0 0 0 0

4 Apna Khet Apna Kam

Nos 1.0 5 5 2 2 2 0

26.3 10.5 0

Horticulture department

1 Horticulture Orchard

Nos 0.42 2 0.84 1 1.68 1 0.42

2 Drip irrigation set

Nos 0.45 2 0.9 1 1.8 1 0.45

3 Sprinklar irrigation set

Nos 0.5 2 1 1 1 1 0.5

4 Hybrid Vegetable

Nos 0.05 2 0.1 2 0.25 1 0.05

Agriculture department 2.84 4.73 1.42

1 Crops demonstration

Nos 0.02 10 2 5 0.1 2 0.04

2 farm pond Nos 0.55 2 1.1 1 1.1 1 0.55

3 soil testing Nos 0.2 0.25 0

3.3 1.35 0.59

Grand Total 32.44 16.58 2.01



OVERALL CONSOLIDATED PLAN for WORKS

S.No Name of Gram Panchyat

IWMP Convergence Total

1 Aloli 77.67 30.01 107.68

2 Mehra Kalan 294.71 50.70 345.41

3 Sadara 114.93 32.44 147.37

4 Kadera 9.01 11.06 20.07

5 Goardha 23.03 16.58 39.61

6 Piplaj 39.25 2.01 41.26

total 558.59 142.8 701.39

S.No Project Cost

1 IWMP 744.8

2 Convergence 142.8

Total 887.6

Ratio of convergence in total cost of project =16%

Overall project cost=14300/-

16% convergene proposed with main schemes only, efforsts will make to mobilize the financial resources with other schmes also for holistic development in a sustainable manner

84%16%

16%IWMP

Convergence



CHAPTER-6

EXPECTED OUTPUT OF THE PROJECT



Chapter-6

Expected Outcomes of the Project

PIA has finalized the activities mentioned in chapter -5 to achieve the desire output of the project.

WDT members developed the specific strategy to achieve the goal of the project in planned

duration. The specific outcomes of the ALOLI project and the list of indicator to measure the

outcome is given below.

6.1 Gap Analysis –

Agriculture Sector

There are a number of factors determining the production potential of the particular crops. There

is large number of biotic or a-biotic production components responsible for the yielding ability of

a particular crop. These may be crop cultivar; climatic conditions especially the moisture index,

length of growing period of the crop, soil type, and nutrient availability in the soil, diseases and

pests incidence and agronomic practices, improper water management. The most important factor

is low percentage of seed replacement rate. Another important factor is the level of awareness

amongst the growers about the crop and production practices including post harvest management

also plays an important role in narrowing the productivity gap. It is therefore necessary to assess

the critical gaps, factors responsible for the gap, strategy to overcome the gap, approach and

methodology to be adopted to implement the strategy, its performance indicators followed by

Sustainability outputs of the activity.

Table-43 Comprataive analysis of productivity

Name of Crop

Yield in Qt/Ha

Project area Ajmer Rajasthan Average

India Average

Potential attainable yield

Bajra 15 15.5 24 19.85 18

Moong 5.75 4.5 3.1 3.5 6

Til 4 6 6.6 5.85 22.0

Jowar 5.5 4.2 8.5 7.5 6

Wheat 18-20 22.20 29.12 28.00 28

Gram 6 9.0 11.9 7.65 9

Maize 12-13.5 8.2 19.7 23.35 18

Cotton 10-11 14 6.5 7.2 12



The analysis of data reveals the fact that there is a gap in the yields of the main crops grown in the

project area with respect to the average productivity of the Average yield of Rajasthan and agro

climate zone. This gap is wide if we compare with the the potential attainable yield in ideal

condition. The main reason for low yield is lack of awareness among small and marginal

farmersa about the improve technology and practices, low seed replacement rate and available

supportive mechanism in the project area.

Reason for low productivity of agriculture

1. Majority of area is dependent on monsoon. Success or failure of monsoon determines the

success or failure of agriculture. Rainfall is generally unreliable due to erratic, inadequate

and uncertainty.

2. Lack of improve technology and modern practices in agriculture adopted by majority of

farmer

3. Lack of adequate farm mechanization in agriculture

4. Lack of good quality seed and fertilizer at time at optimum cost

5. Lack of facility for storage and marketing.

6. Low use efficiency of water

In the project, it is proposed to reach the potiential attainable yield which is mentioned in the

above table by bridge all the gaps. This additional production of 10 to 20 % in the all major

crops would help in increase the additional income sources of the farmers in the direction of

sustainable livelihoods.



Agriculture Sector

Issue Gap and factor responsible for gap Strategy

Variety of Seed Non availability of seed

Poor SRR rate

Lack of farmer awareness about

good quality of seed suitable to

that area

farmer lack of knowledge about

expiry of seed use by them

Market preference and

dominancy to decides the seed

Develop farmer awareness to

choose quality seed suitable to that

area

Crop demonstration through

participatory approaches

Increasing seed availability at

proper time

Develop seed production unit

Technology and

Practice

adopted in

agriculture

Lack of technical know how

about improve methods of

agriculture for sowing ,

weeding , harvesting etc

Lack of farm mechanization

Farmer attitude for low risk

taking capacity

Farmer hesitation for taking

initiatives

Lack of support to motivate

farmer from line

department/institute/NGO

Raising awareness through various

means

Demonstration of improved farm

equipments

Field training to demonstrate the

improve practices in field from

sowing to harvesting

exposure of farmer and build up their

capacity to motivate them for PTD

efforts to make collaboration with

institution and expert

Crop nutrition

and soil health

Farmer attention towards soil

health

Poor understanding of farmer

towards soil health and its

relation to plant uptake

Facility available for soil

testing

develop soil health card of the

individual farmer and motivate them

to use fertilizer pattern and nutrients

as per recommendation

Productivity of 10-50 % gap in productivity as Farmer capacity building for



crops compare to identified potential

yield of crop in context of

state.

technical knowhow is not up

to the mark

lack of supply of agriculture

input at time

Lack of irrigation facility

adopting improve practices and

modern technology in agriculture

Collective efforts to ensure

the supply of agriculture input

Introduction of Package of

INM and IPM and FYM

Address the issue of soil

fertility

Crop

diversification

Focus on mainly traditional

crops

Lack of exposure

lack of initiates

low risk taking capacity

Demonstrate horticulture orchard and

vegetable cultivation with few

progressive farmers

Water

productivity

Poor show of micro irrigation

system

Poor water use efficiency of

canal system

Demonstration of sprinkler and drip

irrigation system

water distribution change to improve

water use efficiency



3.2 Livestock Sector

Issue Gap and factor responsible for gap Strategy

Productivity 30-50 % gap in productivity with

respect to potential yield of livestock

in project area

Lack of awareness and technical

know how about livestock rearing,

feeding management practice

Availability of desi breed

Improved breed by natural and

artificial method

demonstration of improve feeding

practices

demonstration of feeding trough

Health Lack of availability of facilities for


lack of facilities for improve breed in

the project area

Capacity building of local youth for


Provision of improve breed of cattle

Nutrition lack of technical know how about

improve feeding management

demonstration of improve feeding

practices

demonstration of forage crops

6.1 Expected Outcomes-

1. Employment Generation – This is one of the prominent features of IWMP is to create self

sustainable to stake holder in terms of livelihood and increase in employment opportunities.

Watershed creates employment opportunities during the work phase for labor intensive activities

like construction of earthen bund, farm pond, nadi, khadin and through the assets created under

watershed program have a direct impact on agriculture and natural resource development.

However NREGA help to provide 100 days employment to the families in year and watershed

project also would help to give ample opportunities to the poorest families of the project area in

whole seasons.



Indicators –

Project generate approximately 3 lakhs employment days for 3500 families of the project

area.

Increases in income by percentage allocation of 10 to 20 % for the families depend on the

wage labor for their livelihood.

Community gets the work in their field/village

2. Migration –It is below 20 % in the project area during planning phase and expected to decrease

up to 5-10 % at end of project. Those families migrated and exploiated at outer side will get

enabling environment and good wage in the village .

3. Irrigated area – Bench line survey reported that only 650 ha of the area under irrigation. It is

increased by 10% in the project area.

Pre status Post status

% Area % Area

20% 1233 30% 1850 Ha

4. Rise in ground water table – The land treatment work proposed in 3200 ha would certainly help

to conserve the moisture and recharge the ground water. The water table is 25-30 meter at now,

which would increases by 3 to 5 m by assuming the same exploitation of ground water or 25-30 m

at that time.

5. Drinking Water – All project villages’ community is accessed to safe and potable hygiene water

in all season in their villages within a reasonable reach.

6. Productivity of Agriculture - Productivity of agriculture is increased by 10 to 20 % of the major

crops. Please refer the gap analysis describe earlier in the same chapter for detail.

7. Productivity of Livestock- breed improvement of the livestock is the key focus of the project.

Productivity of livestock is increased by 20 to 30 %. the focus



Indicator Pre Project Post Project

% of high breed in Cow Hardly 5 % More than 20 %

% of high breed in Buffalo Nil More than 20%

Milk productivity of cow 4-6 liter 6-8 liter

Milk productivity of buffalo 6-8 liter 8-10 liter

A.I Hardly 10 % cases More than 20 %

Goat Desi breed Improved breed

Goatry (4+1) model help to enhance the income of the poor families and improve breed of goat

help to improve the breed of the existing goat population of the project area.

8. Additional area under cultivation – Soil and Water conservation works help to increase the area

under cultivation. Land reclamation work proposed in this project and “apna khet apna kam

“under NREGA help to incresase the area under cultivation. Cultivable waste land would use for

cultivation and waste land which has no use would cover under pasture. Approximately 10 % of

the total area would cover under reclamation. It would help to improve the net sown area of the

project

9. Area under double crop and gross cropped area- access to irrigation facility help to increase

the double cropped area. It is expected to increase the gross cropped area by 10-12% which

resulted into enhance cropping intensity up to 150%.

10.Crop Diversification- At least 10 % of the farmers go with crop diversification and involve in

vegetable, medicinal and horticulture cultivation in their field along with medicinal and

floriculture.

11.Reduction in erosion – The soil and water conservation works in field help to minimize the

problem of land degradation. It is proposed to reduce soil erosion in the field by 20 to 30 %

12.Soil health –farmers move towards develop soil health card of their field. 40-50 % of farmer’s

use practicing of fertilizer and cropping pattern according to given recommendation of soil health.

13.Awareness about improve technology and modern practices in integrating farming sector –

by end of project, majority of farmers are well aware about technology and improve practices for

enhancement of productivity and adopting it in their practice. .



14.Water Productivity – increased by 15 to 20 %. Peoples are cultivating more area with same

water quantity of irrigation. Develop practices for saving of water and increased water use

efficiency.

15.Common property resources – all types of project community are easily access to CPR. They

are getting fodder and fuel wood adequate enough to fulfill their requirement. An institutional

mechanism developed for usufruct mechanism of the resources on the CPR.

16.Alternate source of livelihoods - 20 to 30 % of BPL families get sustainable source of livelihood

from the efforts of project.

17. Individual entrepreneur –10 poorest entrepreneurs linked with sustainable livelihood sources

and run their own enterprises.

18. Sustainability of SHGs – 50 % of SHGs or 60 SHGs linked with bank and micro enterprises.

They will also successfully gain the benefit of the revolving fund given under project and banks.

19.Extension services and supporting system in villages – strengthened in the village. Community

is easily access to input and knowledge in the village whenever required.

20.Participation of community – Project community are actively involved in the all phases of the

project and taking important decisions

21.Institution Development – at least 120 SHGs, 180 UGs, 6 subcommittee-watersheds and 1

federation formed in the project. all institutions form during the project and functioning

smoothly and involve in watershed project

22.Women empowerment- almost 60 % of the women is linked with SHGs. Actively involved and

participated in the gram sabha, put their issues and taking decision in the program run in the

village. Their attendance increased in meeting.

23.Organic Farming- At least 500 ha area comes under organic farming. Farmer sensitized towards

organic farming and using various means for develop organic fertilizer and replace with chemical

fertilizer.



6.2 Sustainability Indicator

WC is using WDF properly for the post project management and enhancement of income.

WC is qualifying and comes under grading of sustainable institution

All projects run by SHGs link with forward and backward linkages

Practitioners come to project area to see the impact and learn from the project

Government is ready to implement the project in adjoin area

Peoples are replicate the good practices of the project area in another area

All assets created during the project are functioning well and serve the purpose, they made for

All families in the project area have assured income source for their livelihoods.

6.3 Critical Assumption

No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters

Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.

There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before

irreversible damage is done.

Adverse market conditions do not persist long.

Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed

particularly in the rural areas.

Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and

appropriate technical advice and services are provided to farmers whenever required.

The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs

and feedback from participants.

The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District

and State level Implementing Agencies.

6.4 Output of Project

1. Farmer’s per capita income increased by 20-30 % due to agriculture and animal husbandry

intervention.

2. Land less and asset less linked with sustainable sources of income and lived happily



3. Institutions are capable enough to maximize the benefits in judicious manner and upscale the

available fund and sustain the project after exit of PIA.

4. Bio-diversity improved in the project area

5. Knowledge and skill enhanced of the community to get help them to enhance the livelihood

status.

Parameter Unit Pre Project status Post project status

Status of water table Meter 25-30 meter 30-35 meter

Storage Capacity of Water

Bodies

% 12 % more than 20 %

Literacy Rate % 67% 75 %

Availability of drinking water severe problem, non

hygienic

ensure safe and potable water

to all

Access to Irrigation facility Ha 1233 1850

Area under land degradation Ha

Area under micro irrigation Ha 25-30 Ha 100-120 Ha

Yield of Kharif crop % 20-50%

Yield of Rabi crop % 20-30 %

Area under horticulture No Nil 150 Ha

Area under vegetable No 20 Ha 110 Ha

Fodder production % Increased by 20-25%

Milk productivity % increased by 20-50%

Extension and supportive

mechanism

ensure facilities at doorstep of

farmers

SHGs in project area No nil 120

Migration % 5 to 35%in project villages reduced by 20%

Federation No nil 2

Area under private waste land 900 Ha 650 Ha

Women participation in

meeting

very low active participation and ensure

involvement in decision

making

No of skill person person 15-20

Fuel wood and fodder status face problem in drought ,

deficit by 20-40%

self sufficiency in all seaons













CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Alloli Rs in Lakhs 77.67

Villages - Alloli 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

A-Natural Resource Management (NRM)A- NRM- Arable Land Development

1 Field Bund HaType-1 60.5 0.15 9.08 20 3.00 40.5 6.08Type-II 20 0.20 4.00 10 2.00 10 2.00Type-III 20 0.22 4.40 10 2.20 10 2.20

2 Farm Pond Nos 1 0.32 0.32 0 0.00 1 0.323 Khadin Nos

Type-I 16 0.6 9.6 6 3.60 10 6.00Type-II 7 0.9 6.3 4 3.60 3 2.70Type-III 4 1.5 6 2 3.00 2 3.00Type-IV(special) 1 2 2 0 0.00 1 2.00

4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 1 0.3 0.3 0 0.00 1 0.30

5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 4 0.12 0.48 0 0.00 4 0.48

6 Ha 0 0.3 0 0.00 0.00

Sub total -(Arable ) 42.48 17.40 25.08B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development

1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 2 1.26 2.52 0.5 0.63 1.5 1.89

2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 6 0.15 0.9 3 0.45 3 0.45

3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Agro Forestry Ha 6 0.22 1.32 0 0.00 6 1.32

5 Nadi NoType -I 1 1.30 1.3 1 1.30 0 0.00Type-II 1 2.50 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Physical Target

Financial Target

Peripheral Bund of farmers field near by Khari river

6 Road side plantation Km 0 1.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

7 Botanical Park No 1 3.00 3 0.00 1 3.00Sub total (Non arable ) 11.54 2.38 9.16

C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0.00 0 0.00

2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00

Type-I 6 0.39 2.34 0 0.00 6 2.34Type-II 1 0.75 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 LSCD Nos 0.00Type-I 2 0.13 0.26 2 0.31 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.18 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 1 0.21 0.26 1 0.21 0 0.00

4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 3.97 1.63 2.34

Total (NRM) 57.99 21.41 36.58

RWH at Individual house/Common structure

B-PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT & MICRO ENTERPRISES

1 No 33 0.05 1.650 13 0.65 20 1.00

2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 4 0.24 0.960 0 0.00 4 0.96

3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 20 0.08 1.500 0 0.00 20 1.50

4 No 5 0.10 0.500 0 0.00 5 0.50

5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 4 0.06 0.240 0 0.00 4 0.24

6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 4 0.05 0.200 0 0.00 4 0.20

7 NADEP composting No 4 0.12 0.480 0 0.00 4 0.48

8 Vermi Composting Model No 4 0.20 0.800 2 0.40 2 0.40

9 Soil health card of farmers No 110 0.00 0.03 50 0.02 60 0.02

10 Promotion of organic farming No 4 0.05 0.200 2 0.10 2 0.10

11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 50 0.01 0.500 50 0.50 0 0.00

12 Organize Veternery Camps No 4 0.20 0.800 2 0.40 2 0.40

13 Establish Travis in the village No 1 0.10 0.100 1 0.10 0 0.00

14 Manger for livestock No 4 0.12 0.450 4 0.45 0 0.00

15 Primary health kit for livestock No 1 0.05 0.050 0 0.00 1 0.05

16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 4 0.05 0.200 0 0.00 4 0.20

17 No 4 0.05 0.200 0 0.00 4 0.20

18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.000 0.00 0 0.00

19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 2 0.10 0.200 0.00 2 0.20

20 Breed improvement for improve Goat No 2 0.30 0.600 2 0.60 0 0.00

21 Bio-Energy model No 2 0.35 0.700 2 0.70 0.00

Sub total (PE) 10.36 3.92 6.45

Participartory Varietal Selection-Crops Demonstration

Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation

Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management

C-LIVELIHOOD ENHANCEMENT

1 5.59 2.80 2.80

2 2.80 1.40 1.40

3 No 0.93 0.47 0.47

9.32 4.66 4.66Grand Total 77.67 29.99 47.68

Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner

CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Sadara Rs in Lakhs 114.92

Villages - Sadara, Sadari 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

S.No Name of Activity Unit Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin


1 Field Bund HAType-1 132 0.15 19.80 50 7.50 82 12.30 0 0.00Type-II 50 0.20 10.00 25 5.00 25 5.00 0 0.00Type-III 20 0.22 4.40 10 2.20 10 2.20 0 0.00

2 Farm Pond Nos 4 0.32 1.28 2 0.64 2 0.64 0 0.00

3 Khadin Nos

Type-I 12 0.6 7.2 4 2.40 8 4.80 0 0.00Type-II 10 0.9 9 4 3.60 6 5.40 0 0.00Type-III 8 1.5 12 4 6.00 4 6.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 1 2 2 0 0.00 1 2.00

4 Ha 4 0.3 1.2 2 0.60 2 0.60 0 0.00

5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 6 0.12 0.72 0 0.00 2 0.24 4 0.48

6 Nos 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total -(Arable ) 67.60 27.94 39.18 0.48B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development

1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 1.5 1.26 1.89 0 0.00 1 1.26 0.5 0.63

2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 6 0.15 0.9 2 0.30 4 0.60 0 0.00

3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Agro Forestry Ha 6 0.22 1.32 0 0.00 6 1.32 0 0.005 Nadi No

Type -I 2 1.30 2.6 1 1.30 1 1.30 0 0.00Type-II 1 2.50 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Physical Target

Unit Cost

Financial Target

Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land


Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.006 Road side plantation Km 1 1.00 1 0 0.00 1 1.00 0 0.00

7 Botanical Park No 1 3.00 3 0.00 1 3.00 0 0.00

Sub total (Non arable ) 13.21 1.60 10.98 0.63C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment

1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos

Type-I 4 0.39 1.56 2 0.78 2 0.78 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.75 1.5 1 0.75 1 0.75 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 LSCD NosType-I 5 0.13 0.65 5 0.65 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.18 0.36 2 0.36 0.00 0.00Type-III 1 0.21 0.18 1 0.18 0.00 0.00

4 Nos 1 0.75 0.75 0.00 1 0.75 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 5 2.72 2.28 0Total (NRM) 85.81 32.26 52.44 1.11



1 No 61 0.05 3.05 11 0.55 30 1.50 20 1.00

2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 6 0.24 1.44 0 0.00 6 1.44 0 0.00

3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 30 0.08 2.25 0 0.00 20 1.50 10 0.75

4 No 8 0.10 0.80 0 0.00 0 0.00 8 0.80

5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 4 0.06 0.24 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.24

6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 4 0.05 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.20

7 NADEP composting No 6 0.12 0.72 0 0.00 4 0.48 2 0.24

8 Vermi Composting Model No 6 0.20 1.20 0 0.00 2 0.40 4 0.80

9 Soil health card of farmers No 600 0.00 0.16 200 0.04 200 0.06 200 0.06

10 Promotion of organic farming No 4 0.05 0.20 2 0.10 2 0.10 0 0.00

11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 50 0.01 0.50 20 0.20 10 0.10 20 0.20

12 Organize Veternery Camps No 6 0.20 1.20 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40

13 Establish Travis in the village No 1 0.10 0.10 1 0.10 0 0.00 0 0.00

14 Manger for livestock No 8 0.12 0.96 4 0.48 4 0.48 0 0.00

15 Primary health kit for livestock No 2 0.05 0.10 0 0.00 2 0.10 0 0.0016 Demonstration of Forage crops No 10 0.05 0.50 4 0.20 6 0.30 0 0.00

17 No 10 0.05 0.50 0 0.00 6 0.30 4 0.20

18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.0019 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 2 0.10 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.20

20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 1 0.30 0.30 0 0.00 1 0.30 0 0.00

21 Bio-Energy model 2 0.35 0.70 0 0.00 1 0.35 1 0.35Sub total (PE) 15.32 2.07 7.81 5.44





1 8.27 3.31 3.31 1.65

2 4.14 1.66 1.66 0.83

3 No 1.38 0 0.55 0.55 0.28

13.79 5.52 5.52 2.76Grand Total 114.92 39.85 65.77 9.31

Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan

Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan

Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner

CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Kadera Rs in Lakhs 9

Villages - Deopura 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16



1 Field Bund HaType-1 20 0.15 3.00 20 3.00Type-II 0 0.20 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.22 0.00 0 0.00

2 Farm Pond Nos 1 0.32 0.32 1 0.323 Khadin Nos

Type-I 2 0.6 1.2 2 1.20Type-II 0 0.9 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.5 0 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 0 2 0 0 0.00

4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 0 0.3 0 0 0.00

5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 1 0.12 0.12 1 0.12

6 0 0.3 0 0 0.00

Sub total -(Arable ) 4.64 4.64B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development

1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 0 1.26 0 0 0.00

2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 0 0.15 0 0 0.00

3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00

4 Agro Forestry Ha 0 0.22 0 0 0.00

5 Nadi NoType -I 1 1.30 1.3 1 1.30Type-II 0 2.50 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00

6 Road side plantation Km 0 1.00 0 0 0.00

Physical Target

Financial Target


7 Botanical Park No 0 3.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 1.30 1.30

C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos

1.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00

1.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00

2 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) NosType-I 2 0.39 0.78 2 0.78Type-II 0 0.75 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00

3 LSCD NosType-I 0 0.13 0 0 0.00Type-II 0 0.18 0 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.21 0 0 0.00

4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 0.78 0.78Total (NRM) 6.72 6.72



1 No 12 0.05 0.60 0 0.00 12 0.60



4 No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00


6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0 0.00


8 Vermi Composting Model No 0 0.20 0.00 0.00 0 0.00


10 Promotion of organic farming No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00







17 No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 0 0.90 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

20 Breed improvement- Goat No 0 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

21 Bio-Energy model 0 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00

Sub total (PE) 1.20 0.16 1.05





1 0.65 0.39 0.26

2 0.32 0.19 0.13

3 No 0.11 0.07 0.04

1.08 0.65 0.43Grand Total 9.00 7.52 1.48


CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Piplaj Rs in Lakhs 39.24

Villages - Gothra 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16



1 Field Bund HaType-1 48 0.15 7.20 25 3.75 23 3.45Type-II 10.5 0.20 2.10 6 1.20 4.5 0.90Type-III 5 0.22 1.10 5 1.10 0 0.00


Type-I 4 0.6 2.4 2 1.20 2 1.20Type-II 6 0.9 5.4 3 2.70 3 2.70Type-III 1 1.5 1.5 0 0.00 1 1.50Type-IV(special) 1 2 2 0 0.00 1 2.00

4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 1 0.3 0.3 0 0.00 1 0.30


6 No 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00


1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 0 1.26 0 0 0.00 0 02 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 4 0.15 0.6 2 0.30 2 0.303 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.004 Agro Forestry Ha 4 0.22 0.88 0 0.00 4 0.885 Nadi No

Type -I 2 1.30 2.6 1 1.30 1 1.30Type-II 0 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0.00 0.00Type-IV 6.00 0 0.00 0.00

6 Road side plantation Km 0.5 1.00 0.5 0 0.00 0.5 0.50

Physical Target

Financial Target


7 Botanical Park No 0 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 4.58 1.60 2.98

C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos1.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00


Type-I 3 0.39 1.17 2 0.78 1 0.39Type-II 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 LSCD Nos 0.00Type-I 4 0.13 0.51 4 0.51 0 0.00Type-II 2 0.18 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.21 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 2.04 1.65 0.39

Total (NRM) 29.30 13.52 15.78



1 No 20 0.05 1.00 0.00 20 1.00



4 No 3 0.10 0.30 0 0.00 3 0.30






10 Promotion of organic farming No 2 0.05 0.10 2 0.10 0 0.00







17 No 2 0.05 0.10 0 0.00 2 0.10



20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 1 0.30 0.30 0 0.00 1 0.30

21 Bio-Energy model 0 0.35 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (PE) 5.23 0.99 4.24





2 2.82 1.69 1.13

3 1.41 0.85 0.56

4 Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner No 0.47 0.28 0.19

4.70 2.82 1.88Grand Total 39.23 17.33 21.90

Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan

CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Gordha Rs in Lakhs 23.04 Villages -Amli, Mehrukhurd 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16



1 Field Bund HaType-1 50 0.15 7.50 20 3.00 30 4.50Type-II 10 0.20 2.00 5 1.00 5 1.00Type-III 0 0.22 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00


Type-I 5 0.6 3 2 1.20 3 1.80Type-II 2 0.9 1.8 1 0.90 1 0.90Type-III 0 1.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 0 2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00


6 No 0 0.3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00


1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 0 1.26 0 0 0.00 0 02 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 2 0.15 0.3 1 0.15 1 0.153 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.004 Agro Forestry Ha 1.5 0.22 0.33 0 0.00 1.5 0.335 Nadi No

Type -I 1 1.30 1.3 0 0.00 1 1.30Type-II 0 2.50 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 4.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

6 Road side plantation Km 0 1.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

7 Botanical Park No 0 3.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Physical Target

Financial Target


Sub total (Non arable ) 1.93 0.15 1.78C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment

1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 0 2.5 0 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 0 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00


Type-I 2 0.39 0.73 2 0.73 0 0.00Type-II 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 1.2 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 LSCD Nos 0.00Type-I 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 0 0.18 0 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 0 0.21 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Nos 0 0.75 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 0.73 0.73 0

Total (NRM) 17.20 6.98 10.22



1 No 12 0.05 0.60 0.00 12 0.60



4 No 0 0.10 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00






10 Promotion of organic farming No 1 0.05 0.05 1 0.05







17 No 0 0.05 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00



20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 0 0.30 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

21 Bio-Energy model No 0 0.35 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (PE) 3.07 0.57 2.50





2 1.66 1.00 0.66

3 0.82 0.49 0.33

4 Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner No 0.28 0.17 0.11

2.76 1.66 1.10Grand Total 23.03 9.21 13.82


CHAPTER-5 WATERSHED TREATMENT PLAN

Gram Panchyat Mehrukalan Rs in Lakhs 294.73

Villages - Balapura, Nayagaon, Mehrukalan 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16



1 Field Bund HaType-1 250 0.15 37.50 80 12.00 120 18.00 50 7.50 0.00Type-II 160 0.20 32.00 50 10.00 60 12.00 50 10.00 0.00Type-III 40 0.22 8.80 20 4.40 20 4.40 0 0.00 0.00

2 Farm Pond Nos 6 0.32 1.92 2 0.64 4 1.28 0 0.00 0.003 Khadin Nos

Type-I 51 0.6 30.6 11 6.60 30 18.00 10 6.00 0.00Type-II 23 0.9 20.7 6 5.40 10 9.00 7 6.30 0.00Type-III 10 1.5 15 2 3.00 6 9.00 2 3.00 0.00Type-IV(special) 4 2 8 1 2.00 2 4.00 1 2.00 0.00

4 Land reclamation of Cultivable Waste land Ha 4 0.3 1.2 2 0.60 2 0.60 0 0.00 0.005 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 12 0.12 1.44 0 0.00 4 0.48 8 0.96 0.00

6 No 15 0.3 4.5 5 1.50 5 1.50 5 1.50 0.00

Sub total -(Arable ) 161.66 46.14 78.26 37.26B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development

1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 5 1.26 6.3 1 1.26 3 3.78 1 1.26 0.002 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 15 0.15 2.25 5 0.75 10 1.50 0 0.00 0.003 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.004 Agro Forestry Ha 15 0.22 3.3 0 0.00 10 2.20 5 1.10 0.005 Nadi No 0.00

Type -I 2 1.30 2.6 1 1.30 1 1.30 0 0.00 0.00Type-II 2 2.50 5 0.00 1 2.50 1 2.50 0.00Type-III 1 4.00 4 0.00 1 4.00 0 0.00 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

6 Road side plantation Km 2 1.00 2 0 0.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 0.007 Botanical Park No 2 3.00 6 0.00 1 3.00 1 3.00 0.00

Physical Target

Financial Target


Sub total (Non arable ) 31.45 3.31 19.28 8.86C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment

1 ANICUT Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001.1 Type-I 1 2.5 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00 0.001.2 Type-II 2 5 10 0.00 1 5.00 1 5.00 0.003 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00

Type-I 10 0.39 3.9 4 1.56 6 2.34 0 0.00 0.00Type-II 6 0.75 4.5 3 2.25 3 2.25 0 0.00 0.00Type-III 2 1.2 2.4 0 0.00 1 1.20 1 1.20 0.00

4 LSCD NosType-I 8 0.13 1.04 4 0.52 4 0.52 0.00 0.00Type-II 4 0.18 0.72 4 0.72 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Type-III 2 0.21 0.41 2 0.41 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

5 Nos 2 0.75 1.5 1 0.75 1 0.75 0.00 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 26.97 6.21 14.56 6.2Total (NRM) 220.08 55.66 112.10 52.32



1 No 251 0.05 12.55 50 2.50 75 3.75 75 3.75 51 2.55

2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 12 0.24 2.88 0 0.00 6 1.44 6 1.44 0.00

3 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 100 0.08 7.50 0 0.00 40 3.00 60 4.50 0.00

4 No 15 0.10 1.50 0 0.00 10 1.00 5 0.50 0.00

5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 8 0.06 0.48 0 0.00 4 0.24 4 0.24 0.00

6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 5 0.05 0.25 0 0 0.00 5 0.25 0.00

7 NADEP composting No 15 0.12 1.80 5 0.60 5 0.60 5 0.60 0.00

8 Vermi Composting Model No 10 0.20 2.00 0 0.00 5 1.00 5 1.00 0.009 Soil health card of farmers No 350 0.00 0.11 100 0.03 100 0.03 150 0.05 0.00

10 Promotion of organic farming No 10 0.05 0.50 0 0.00 4 0.20 6 0.30 0.00

11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 100 0.01 1.00 40 0.40 40 0.40 20 0.20 0.00

12 Organize Veternery Camps No 9 0.20 1.80 3 0.60 2 0.40 2 0.40 2 0.40

13 Establish Travis in the village No 2 0.10 0.20 2 0.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00

14 Manger for livestock No 15 0.12 1.80 5 0.60 5 0.60 5 0.60 0.00

15 Primary health kit for livestock No 3 0.05 0.13 1 0.03 2 0.10 0 0.00 0.00

16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 15 0.05 0.75 5 0.25 5 0.25 5 0.25 0.00

17 No 10 0.05 0.50 0 0.00 5 0.25 5 0.25 0.00

18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 1 0.90 0.90 0 0.00 1 0.90 0 0.00 0.00

19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 3 0.10 0.30 0 0.00 1 0.10 2 0.20 0.00

20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 2 0.30 0.60 0 0.00 2 0.60 0 0.00 0.00

21 Bio-Energy model 5 0.35 1.75 0 2 0.70 3 1.05

Sub total (PE) 39.30 5.21 15.56 15.58 2.95





1 21.22 4.24 6.37 8.49 2.12

2 10.61 2.12 3.18 4.24 1.06

3 Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner No 3.54 0.71 1.06 1.42 0.35

35.37 7.07 10.61 14.15 3.54Grand Total 294.75 67.94 138.27 82.04 6.49


CHAPTER-3 GRAM PANCHYAT WISE WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Piplaj, Gordha, Mehrukalan Rs in Lakhs

Villages - Piplaj Gordha Mehrukalan

S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin


1 Field Bund HaType-1 0.15 48 7.20 50 7.50 250 37.50Type-II 0.20 10.5 2.10 20 4.00 0 0.00Type-III 0.22 5 1.10 20 4.40 0 0.00

2 Farm Pond Nos 0.32 1 0.32 1 0.32 1 0.323 Khadin Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Type-I 0.6 4 2.40 16 9.60 2 1.20Type-II 0.9 6 5.40 7 6.30 0 0.00Type-III 1.5 1 1.50 4 6.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 2 1 2.00 1 2.00 0 0.00

4 Ha 0.3 1 0.30 1 0.30 0 0.00

5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 0.12 3 0.36 4 0.48 1 0.12

6 No 0.3 0 0.00 0 0.00 15 4.50


1 Ha 1.26 0 0.00 2 2.52 0 0.00

2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 0.15 4 0.60 6 0.90 0 0.00

3 Staggered Trench Ha 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Agro Forestry Ha 0.22 4 0.88 6 1.32 0 0.005 Nadi No 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Type -I 1.30 2 2.60 1 1.30 1 1.30Type-II 2.50 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 4.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 6.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

6 Road side plantation Km 1.00 0.5 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00

7 Botanical Park No 3.00 0 0.00 1 3.00 0 0.00

Sub total (Non arable ) 4.58 11.54 1.30C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment

1 ANICUT Nos 0.001.1 Type-I 2.5 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

2 Nos 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

Type-I 0.39 3 1.17 6 2.34 2 0.78Type-II 0.75 0 0.00 1 0.75 0 0.00Type-III 1.2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 LSCD Nos 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00Type-I 0.13 4 0.52 2 0.26 0 0.00



Pasture Development and Agro Forestry

Minor Masnory Structure(MMS)

Type-II 0.18 2 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 0.21 0 0.00 1 0.21 0 0.00

4 Nos 0.75 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 2.05 3.92 0.78Total (NRM) 29.31 56.36 45.72


1 No 0.05 20 1.00 33 1.65 12 0.60

2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 0.24 3 0.72 4 0.96 1 0.24

3 No 0.08 6 0.45 20 1.50 0 0.00

4 No 0.10 3 0.30 5 0.50 0 0.00

5 No 0.06 2 0.12 4 0.24 0 0.00

6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00

7 NADEP composting No 0.12 2 0.24 4 0.48 0 0.00

8 Vermi Composting Model No 0.20 2 0.40 4 0.80 0 0.00

9 Soil health card of farmers No 0.00 100 0.03 110 0.03 40 0.01

10 Promotion of organic farming No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00

11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 0.01 19 0.19 50 0.50 0 0.00

12 Organize Veternery Camps No 0.20 3 0.60 4 0.80 2 0.40

13 Establish Travis in the village No 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 0 0.00

14 Manger for livestock No 0.12 2 0.24 4 0.48 0 0.00

15 No 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.05 0 0.00

16 No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00

17 No 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 0 0.00

18 No 0.90 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 0 0.00

20 Breed improvement- Goatry No 0.30 1 0.30 2 0.60 0 0.0021 Bio-Energy model 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 1.75

Sub total (PE) 5.24 9.69 1.25



Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation Demonstration of Spice cultivation

Primary health kit for livestock

Demonstration of Forage crops

Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management Breed Improvement - Natural method


1 40.21 13.43 14.52

2 20.10 6.71 7.26

3 No 6.71 2.24 2.42

67.02 22.37 24.20Grand Total 101.57 88.43 71.18

Grant in Aids for SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan

Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for individual entrepreuner

CHAPTER-3 GRAM PANCHYAT WISE WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Sadara, Alloli, Kadera Rs in Lakhs

Villages - Sadara Alloli Kadera

S.No Name of Activity Unit Unit Cost Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin


1 Field Bund HaType-1 0.15 132 19.80 60.5 9.08 20 3.00Type-II 0.20 50 10.00 20 4.00 0 0.00Type-III 0.22 20 4.40 20 4.40 0 0.00

2 Farm Pond Nos 0.32 4 1.28 1 0.32 1 0.323 Khadin Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Type-I 0.24 12 2.88 16 3.84 2 0.48Type-II 0.4 10 4.00 7 2.80 0 0.00Type-III 0.6 8 4.80 4 2.40 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 1 1 1.00 1 1.00 0 0.00

4 Ha 0.35 4 1.40 1 0.35 0 0.00

5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 0.12 6 0.72 4 0.48 1 0.12

6 No 0.15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00


1 Ha 1.26 1.5 1.89 2 2.52 0 0.00

2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 0.15 6 0.90 6 0.90 0 0.00

3 Staggered Trench Ha 0.13 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Agro Forestry Ha 1.36 6 8.16 6 8.16 0 0.00

5 Nadi No 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type -I 1.30 2 2.60 1 1.30 1 1.30Type-II 2.50 1 2.50 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 4.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 6.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

6 Road side plantation Km 1.00 1 1.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

7 Botanical Park No 3.00 1 3.00 1 3.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 20.05 18.38 1.30

C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos 0.00

1.1 Type-I 2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 3.5 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

Type-I 0.39 4 1.56 6 2.34 2 0.78Type-II 0.75 2 1.50 1 0.75 0 0.00



Pasture Development and Agro Forestry

Type-III 1.2 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.004 LSCD Nos 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00

Type-I 0.13 5 0.65 2 0.26 0 0.00Type-II 0.18 2 0.36 2 0.36 0 0.00Type-III 0.21 1 0.21 1 0.21 0 0.00

5 Nos 1.5 1 1.50 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 5.78 3.92 0.78Total (NRM) 76.11 50.97 6.00


1 No 0.05 61 3.05 33 1.65 12 0.60

2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 0.24 6 1.44 4 0.96 1 0.24

3 No 0.08 30 2.25 20 1.50 0 0.00

4 No 0.10 8 0.80 5 0.50 0 0.00

5 No 0.06 4 0.24 4 0.24 0 0.00

6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 0.05 4 0.20 4 0.20 0 0.00

7 NADEP composting No 0.12 6 0.72 4 0.48 0 0.00

8 Vermi Composting Model No 0.20 6 1.20 4 0.80 0 0.00

9 Soil health card of farmers No 0.00 600 0.18 110 0.03 40 0.01

10 Promotion of organic farming No 0.05 4 0.20 4 0.20 0 0.00

11 Zpsum for land reclamation No 0.05 50 2.50 50 2.50 0 0.00

12 Organize Veternery Camps No 0.20 6 1.20 4 0.80 2 0.40

13 Establish Travis in the village No 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 0 0.00

14 Manger for livestock No 0.12 8 0.96 4 0.48 0 0.0015 Primary health kit for livestock No 0.05 2 0.10 1 0.05 0 0.0016 Demonstration of Forage crops No 0.05 10 0.50 4 0.20 0 0.00

17 No 0.05 10 0.50 4 0.20 0 0.00

18 No 0.90 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20 0 0.00

20 No 0.30 1 0.30 2 0.60 0 0.00

21 Bio-Energy model No 2 0.00 2 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (PE) 16.64 11.69 1.25



Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model Demonstration of Model of Medicinal cultivation Demonstration of Spice cultivation

Demonstration of nutritious feedeing management Breed Improvement - Natural method

Breed improvement- Goatry model(4+1)


2 40.21 13.43 14.52

3 20.10 6.71 7.26

4 No 6.71 2.24 2.42

67.02 22.37 24.20Grand Total 159.77 85.03 31.46


CHAPTER-5 CONSOLIDATED WATERSHED TREATMENT PLANGram Panchyat Mehrukalan, Gordha, Piplaj, Kadera, Sadara, Alloli Rs in Lakhs 558.59

Villages - 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

S.No Name of Activity

Unit Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin


1 Field Bund HaType-1 560.5 0.15 84.08 215 32.25 295.5 44.33 50 7.50 0 0.00Type-II 250.5 0.20 50.10 96 19.20 104.5 20.90 50 10.00 0 0.00Type-III 85 0.22 18.70 45 9.90 40 8.80 0 0.00 0 0.00

2 Farm Pond Nos 13 0.32 4.16 6 1.92 7 2.24 0 0.00 0 0.003 Khadin Nos 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Type-I 90 0.6 54 27 16.20 53 31.80 10 6.00 0 0.00Type-II 48 0.9 43.2 18 16.20 23 20.70 7 6.30 0 0.00Type-III 23 1.5 34.5 8 12.00 13 19.50 2 3.00 0 0.00Type-IV(special) 7 2 14 1 2.00 5 10.00 1 2.00 0 0.00

4 Ha 10 0.3 3 4 1.20 6 1.80 0 0.00 0 0.00

5 Horticulture Orchard (NRM) RM 28 0.12 3.36 1 0.12 15 1.80 12 1.44 0 0.00

6 No 15 0.3 4.5 5 1.50 5 1.50 5 1.50 0 0.00

Sub total -(Arable ) 313.60 112.49 163.37 37.74 0.00B-NRM- Non Arable Land Development

1 Pasture Development and Agro Forestry Ha 8.5 1.26 10.71 1.5 1.89 5.5 6.93 1.5 1.89 0 0.00

2 Contour Trench (CCT) Ha 33 0.15 4.95 13 1.95 20 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 Staggered Trench Ha 0 0.13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Agro Forestry Ha 32.5 0.22 7.15 0 0.00 27.5 6.05 5 1.10 0 0.005 Nadi No 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

Type -I 9 1.30 11.7 5 6.50 4 5.20 0 0.00 0 0.00

Physical Target

Unit Cost

Financial Target



Type-II 4 2.50 10 0 0.00 3 7.50 1 2.50 0 0.00Type-III 1 4.00 4 0 0.00 1 4.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-IV 0 6.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

6 Road side plantation Km 3.5 1.00 3.5 0 0.00 2.5 2.50 1 1.00 0 0.00

7 Botanical Park No 4 3.00 12 0 0.00 3 9.00 1 3.00 0 0.00Sub total (Non arable ) 64.01 10.34 44.18 9.49 0.00

C-NRM- Drainage Line Treatment 1 ANICUT Nos 0.001.1 Type-I 1 2.5 2.5 0 0.00 1 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.001.2 Type-II 2 4.98 9.96 0 0.00 1 4.98 1 4.98 0 0.003 Minor Masnory Structure(MMS) Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Type-I 27 0.39 10.53 12 4.68 15 5.85 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 9 0.75 6.75 5 3.75 4 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 2 1.2 2.4 0 0.00 1 1.22 1 1.22 0 0.00

4 LSCD Nos 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Type-I 19 0.13 2.47 15 1.91 4 0.52 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-II 10 0.18 1.8 10 1.80 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00Type-III 4 0.21 0.84 4 0.84 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

5 Nos 3 0.75 2.25 1 0.75 2 1.50 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sub total (DLT) 39.5 13.73 19.57 6.2 0

Total (NRM) 417.11 136.56 227.12 53.43 0.00


B-PRODUCTIVITY SYSTEM

1 No 389 0.05 19.45 74 3.70 169 8.45 95 4.75 51 2.55

2 Horticulture Orchard Model No 28 0.24 6.72 0 0.00 22 5.28 6 1.44 0 0.003 Hybrid Vegetable Cultivation Model No 161 0.08 12.08 0 0.00 91 6.83 70 5.25 0 0.00

4 No 31 0.10 3.10 0 0.00 18 1.80 13 1.30 0 0.00

5 Demonstration of Spice cultivation No 18 0.06 1.08 0 0.00 10 0.60 8 0.48 0 0.00

6 Demonstration of Aromatic No 15 0.05 0.75 0 0.00 6 0.30 9 0.45 0 0.00

7 NADEP composting No 29 0.12 3.48 7 0.84 15 1.80 7 0.84 0 0.00

8 Vermi Composting Model No 24 0.20 4.80 2 0.40 13 2.60 9 1.80 0 0.00

9 Soil health card of farmers No 1300 0.00 0.39 520 0.16 430 0.13 350 0.11 0 0.00

10 Promotion of organic farming No 21 0.05 1.05 6 0.30 9 0.45 6 0.30 0 0.00

11 Gypsum for land reclamation No 229 0.01 2.29 130 1.30 59 0.59 40 0.40 0 0.00

12 Organize Veternery Camps No 26 0.20 5.20 10 2.00 10 2.00 4 0.80 2 0.40

13 Establish Travis in the village No 5 0.10 0.50 5 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.0014 Manger for livestock No 31 0.12 3.72 17 2.04 9 1.08 5 0.60 0 0.0015 Primary health kit for livestock No 8 0.05 0.40 1 0.05 7 0.35 0 0.00 0 0.00

16 Demonstration of Forage crops No 33 0.05 1.52 9 0.45 19 0.82 5 0.25 0 0.00

17 No 26 0.05 1.30 0 0.00 17 0.85 9 0.45 0 0.00

18 Breed Improvement - Natural method No 1 0.90 0.90 0 0.00 1 0.90 0 0.00 0 0.00

19 Tool kit for skill labor for IGA No 8 0.10 0.80 0 0.00 4 0.40 4 0.40 0 0.00

20 Breed improvement- Goatry model(4+1) No 6 0.30 1.80 2 0.60 4 1.20 0 0.00 0 0.00

21 Bio-Energy model 9 0.35 3.15 2 0.70 3 1.05 4 1.40 0 0.00

Sub total (PE) 74.48 13.04 37.47 21.02 2.95





1 40.23 1.21 20.35 15.18 3.48

2 20.10 0.61 10.17 7.59 1.74

3 No 6.70 0.20 3.39 2.53 0.58

67.03 2.02 33.91 25.30 5.80Grand Total 558.61 151.62 298.50 99.75 8.75

Revolving fund to SHGs for their Livelihood Action Plan Grant in Aids for SHGs federation for their Livelihood Action Plan Revolving fund to individual entrepreuners

ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECTPANCHYAT SAMITI-KEKRI DISTRICT AJMER

SUMMARY SHEET OF GRAM PANCHYATS OF WORKS COMPONENT

Sanction CostWORKS Percentage allocation

Total SWC PE LE SWC PE LESadara 153.24 114.93 85.81 15.32 13.79 56.00 10.00 9.00Alloli 103.56 77.67 57.99 10.36 9.32 56.00 10.00 9.00Mehrukalan 393.00 294.75 220.08 39.30 35.37 56.00 10.00 9.00Piplaj 52.32 39.24 29.30 5.23 4.71 56.00 10.00 9.00Gordha 30.72 23.04 17.20 3.07 2.76 56.00 10.00 9.00Kadera 12.00 9.00 6.72 1.20 1.08 56.00 10.00 9.00

744.84 558.63 417.11 74.48 67.04The proposed allocation of budget is as per norms of the common guidelines, hence it is O.K

NRM PE LESadara 85.81 15.32 13.79Alloli 57.99 10.36 9.32Mehrukalan 220.08 39.30 35.37Piplaj 29.30 5.23 4.70Gordha 17.20 3.07 2.76Kadera 6.72 1.20 1.08

Name of Gram Panchyat

Sadara Alloli Mehrukalan Piplaj Gordha Kadera

85.81

57.99

220.08

29.3017.20

6.7215.32 10.36

39.30

5.23 3.07 1.2013.79 9.32

35.37

4.70 2.76 1.08

Component wise budget

NRMPELE

CONSOLIDATED BUDGET OF ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT ( Rs in Lakhs)

S.No Head

Year

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-171 Adminstration 10 74.48 9.85 14.48 14.52 14.52 13.51 7.552 Capacity Building 5 37.24 9.01 15.12 7.52 2.61 2.95 0.003 EPA 4 29.79 18.00 11.79 0.00 0.00 0.004 Works 75 558.60 0.00 113.72 223.88 74.81 6.56 05 DPR Preparation 1 7.45 3.50 3.956 Consolidation Phase 3 22.34 17.88 4.477 Monitoring 1 7.45 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.498 Evaluation 1 7.45 1.49 2.98 2.98

744.80 41.85 160.55 247.41 96.41 42.39 15.00

Adminstration 74.48Capacity Building 37.24EPA 29.79Works 558.60DPR Preparation 7.45Consolidation Phase 22.34Monitoring 7.45Evaluation 7.45

Percentage Allocation

Financial Target

Adminstration Capacity Building

EPAWorks

DPR PreparationConsolidation Phase

Monitoring Evaluation

0.00

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

74.4837.24 29.79

558.60

7.45 22.34 7.45 7.45

Component wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-1741.85 198.30 322.16 121.35 44.58 15.00

5.62 26.62 43.25 16.29 5.99 2.01

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

41.85

198.30

322.16

121.35

44.58

15.00

Year wise proposed budget (Rs in Lakhs)

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-175.62 26.62 43.25 16.29 5.99 2.01

Adminstration 10Capacity Building 5

5.62

26.62

43.25

16.29

5.99 2.01

Year wise proposed budget (in %)

2011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-17

EPA 4Works 75

DPR Preparation 1Consolidation Phase 3

Monitoring 1Evaluation 1

10%

5%

4%

75%

1% 3% 1% 1%

Percentage allocation of Budget

Adminstration Capacity Building EPAWorksDPR PreparationConsolidation PhaseMonitoring Evaluation

STAKEHOLDER WISE BUDGET ALLOCATION OF ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECTRs in Lakhs

COMPONENTPercentage allocation as per guidelines Budget

SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WCADMINISTRATION 10 74.48 7.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 52.14 22.35EVALUATION 1 7.45 0.20 0.20 0.60 1.49 1.49 4.47 0.00MONITORING 1 7.45 1.00 7.45 0.00 0.00 0.00CAPACITY BUILDING 5 37.24 0.05 1.30 3.65 0.37 9.68 27.19 0.00DPR 1 7.45 1.00 0.00 0.00 7.45 0.00EPA 4 29.79 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.79WORKS 56 417.11 56.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 417.11Production System 10 74.48 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.48Livelyhood 9 67.04 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.04CONSOLIDATION 3 22.35 0.10 0.10 0.20 2.60 0.74 0.74 1.49 19.37

100 744.84 1.35 1.60 12.45 84.60 10.06 11.92 92.73 630.13

Allocation (in %)

Sanction budget

YEAR WISE BUDGETING OF VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS UNDER ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT

COMPONENT SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WC

YEAR 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

ADMINISTRATION 6.90 2.95 10.14 4.34 10.16 4.36EVALUATION 1.49MONITORING 1.49 1.49

CAPACITY BUILDING 0.07 1.49 7.45 0.22 3.72 11.17 0.07 3.72 3.72

DPR 3.50 3.95EPA 14.00 15.79WORKS 113.72 223.88Production System 19.71 38.81Livelyhood 18.19 35.82CONSOLIDATION Total 0.07 1.49 17.85 16.95 1.71 3.72 25.26 171.75 3.05 3.72 13.88 302.87

SLNA DWDC PIA WC

10.05 11.92

92.71

630.06


YEAR WISE BUDGETING OF VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS UNDER ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT

COMPONENT SLNA DWDC PIA WC SLNA PIA WC SLNA PIA WC SLNA DWDC PIA WC

YEAR 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total

ADMINISTRATION 10.16 4.36 9.46 4.05 5.29 2.26 0.00 0.00 52.11 22.32EVALUATION 1.49 1.49 2.98 1.49 1.49 4.47 0.00MONITORING 1.49 1.49 1.49 7.45 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.74 1.86 2.98 0.37 9.68 27.19 0.00

DPR 0.00 0.00 7.45 0.00EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.79WORKS 74.81 6.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 418.97Production System 12.97 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.67Livelyhood 11.97 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.03CONSOLIDATION 0.74 0.74 1.49 14.90 4.47 0.74 0.74 1.49 19.36Total 1.49 2.23 13.51 104.11 2.23 0.74 13.93 27.74 1.49 0.00 8.27 6.73 10.05 11.92 92.71 630.14

SLNA 10.05DWDC 11.92PIA 92.71WC 630.06

SLNA 1.35DWDC 1.60PIA 12.45WC 84.59

DWDC

DWDC

CAPACITY BUILDING

SLNA DWDC PIA WCADMINISTRATION 0.00 0.00 44.06 18.89EVALUATION 1.26 1.26 3.78 0.00MONITORING 6.30 0.00 0.00 0.00CAPACITY BUILDING 0.31 8.19 22.98 0.00DPR 0.00 0.00 6.29 0.00EPA 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.18WORKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 472.23CONSOLIDATION 0.63 0.63 1.26 16.37

8.50 10.07 78.37 532.67

SLNA DWDC PIA WC

10.05 11.92

92.71

630.06


1.35 1.6012.45

84.59

Stakeholders wise budget (in %)

SLNADWDCPIAWC

Consolidated Sheet of Budget and Plan of Gram Panchyats of Fund at WC level

ActivityBudget (Rs in Lakhs )

Total CostALLOLI SADARA KADERA PIPLAJ GOTHRAAdmn. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Monitoring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00EPA 0.04 0.06 0.16 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.30I & CB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00DPR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00WORKS 0.00

57.99 85.81 220.08 6.72 29.30 17.20 417.10

Arable Land Development 42.48 67.60 161.66 4.64 22.68 14.54 313.60

11.54 13.21 31.45 1.30 4.58 1.93 64.01

Drainage Line Treatment 3.97 5 26.97 0.78 2.04 0.73 39.49

10.36 15.32 39.30 1.20 5.23 3.07 74.48

9.32 13.79 35.37 1.08 4.7 2.76 67.02

Consoldation phase 0.03 0.04 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.19

MEHRUKALAN

Natural Resource Management

Non Arable Land Development

Productivity Enhancement

Livelihood Enhancement

ADMINISTRATION Allocated budget 74.4 Lakhs

S.No PARTICULAR REMARKS

1 SALARY of WDT members 28.38 5.16 5.16 5.16 5.16 5.16 2.58

2 Salary of WC secretary 8.64 0 1.08 2.16 2.16 2.16 1.08

3 Remuneration of Volunteer 4.80 0 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.6

4 Transportation 8.20 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 two and four wheeler

5 8.50 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 for 3 offices

6 Computer with all system 0.75 0.75 0 0 0 0

7 Furniture and Dari of WC office 0.90 0 0.9 0 0 0 0

8 Miscellaneous expenses 14.31 2 3 3 3 2 1.31

74.48 9.86 14.49 14.52 14.52 13.52 7.57

Proposed amount

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

43OOO per month of four members

3000 per month of six members for 4 1/2 years

2500/- per month for maximum 4 volunteer

Overhead expenses of PIA and WC office

CAPACITY BUILDING To be organised by PIA

STAKEHOLDERS Rate Amount 1 PRIs

District level 30 20 1 1 450 9000Block Level 27 40 1 1 300 12000GP level 45 220 1 6 150 198000

2 WDT 4 4 2 3 500 120004 4 3 2 500 120004 4 1 6 150 3600

3 SHGs 380 300 1 6 150 270000300 2 3 250 450000300 3 2 300 540000

4 UG 200 200 1 5 150 150000

5 Farmers 405 780 1 1 150 117000

6 WC members 60 1 5 150 4500060 2 2 300 7200060 3 1 300 54000

7 Exposure Combined common exposure 365000SHGs 55000UG 42000WC 40000

8 Slogan writing, Display writing 115000

9 IEC 10200010 Capacity building of Individuals 55000

Total 2718600Manage by PIA 2718600Manage by DWDC 968000Manage by SLNA 37240Grand Total 3723840

Total No

Participants covered

No of Days

No of Trainings

PANEL OF RESOURCE INSTITUTIONS

S.NO Name of Institution Address Area of Expertise

1 Krishi Vighyan Kendra, Ajmer Ajmer

2 Central Spice Tabiji Pulses

3 Agriculture Research station Tabiji

4 Panchyat Training Center Ajmer grass root level training

5 Deputy Director, Veterniry department Ajmer Livestock Management , Dairy 6 ARAVALI Ajmer Livelihoods

7 Agriculture Department

8 State Institute of Agriculture Management Jaipur

9 M.R. Morarka Ajmer SHG/UG

10 Mayajan Dausa

11 BAIF Ajmer Livestock Management

12 CTAE Udaipur Soil and Water conservation 13 KAZRI

Agriculture Technology and Management




ALLOLI WATERSHED PROJECT - AREA ALLOCATION & BUDGET

S.No Village Gram Panchyat Area1 Sadra Sadara 716 0.12 0.862 Sadari 561 0.09 0.67

sub total(sadara) 1277 0.21 1.53

3 Alloli Alloli 863 0.14 1.044 Balapura Mehrokalan 614 0.10 0.745 Nayagaon 547 0.09 0.666 Mehrokalan 2114 0.34 2.54

3275 0.53 3.93

7 Gothra Piplaj 436 0.07 0.528 Deopura Kadera 100 0.02 0.129 Amli Gordha 105 0.02 0.13

10 Mehrukhurd 151 0.02 0.18sub total(Gordha) 256 0.04 0.31Grand total 6207 1.00 7.45

% of Total project area

Allocation of Budget(project villages )

sub total(Mehrukalan)

Allocation of Budget at Sub Committee-Watershed at Gram Panchyat LevelGram Panchyat Name of Villages EPA (4%)

Sadara Sadara, Sadari 1.53 1.30 0.05 0.06 1.15 0.04

Alloli Alloli 1.04 0.88 0.03 0.04 0.78 0.03

Mehrukalan 3.93 3.32 0.12 0.16 2.95 0.10

Piplaj Gothra 0.52 0.44 0.02 0.02 0.39 0.01

Kadera Deopura 0.12 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00

Gordha Amli, Mehrokhurd 0.31 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.01

7.45 6.30 0.22 0.30 5.59 0.19

Sanction Budget (100%)

Allocation budget to sub

committee (84.60%)

Administration (3%)

Works (75%)

Consolidation (2.60%)

Balapura, Nayagaon, Mehrukalan

Documents

ALOLI IWMP Project, Kekri, Ajmer - water.rajasthan.gov.inwater.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed-development-and... · River Basin BANAS Major soil type Clay, Loamy clay