19
Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008 ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation A.M. Baryshev NOVA/SRON/RuG

ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

  • Upload
    faris

  • View
    45

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation. A.M. Baryshev NOVA/SRON/RuG. Outline. band 9 optics measurement system (example) Band 9 efficiency analysis NA FEIC data for band 9 and band 7 Q/A. The beam pattern measurement Set-Up. Typical near field measurements. Amplitude. Phase. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

A.M. BaryshevNOVA/SRON/RuG

Page 2: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Outline

• band 9 optics measurement system (example)

• Band 9 efficiency analysis

• NA FEIC data for band 9 and band 7

• Q/A

Page 3: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

The beam pattern measurement Set-Up

Page 4: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Typical near field measurements

PhaseAmplitude

Page 5: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Far field beam patterns

80% typical aperture

efficiency

Page 6: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

620 640 660 680 700FrequencyGHz

75

80

85

90

95

100edutilpmA

ycneiciffe%

P1

P0

Aperture Efficiency

No central blockage

Page 7: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Beam pointing I

620 640 660 680 700FrequencyGHz

1

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

0.2

maeB

elgnaged P1 Y tilt

P0 Y tilt

P1 X tilt

P0 X tilt

Page 8: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Beam pointing II

-3 -2 -1 1 2 3

-4

-3

-2

-1

1

2 X and y axes are beamoffsets in degrees

Red – Pol 0Green Pol 1Blue secondary mirrorangular dimensions

Page 9: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Focus offset (x,y)

620 640 660 680 700FrequencyGHz3

2

1

0

1

2sucoF

noitisopmm

P1 YP0 YP1 XP0 X

Page 10: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Beam squint

Page 11: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Defocus

620 640 660 680 700FrequencyGHz

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

sucoF

noitisopmm P1 Z

P0 Z

Page 12: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Co-polar

Page 13: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Cross -polar

-19dB peak, -18dB total power

Page 14: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

Far field cross pol ratio

90 95 100 105 110 115

90

95

100

105

110

115

Red = -10dB4 dB contour

Page 15: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

NA FEIC data b9, near fieldNRAO FE1 band9 2007-11 Scan 77 FF SINGLE BEAM.txt

-20 0 20 40X displacement (mm)

-40

-20

0

20

40

)m

m( tnemecalpsid

Y

)Bd( edutilp

mA detcete

D

0. -5. -10. -15. -20. -25. -30. -35. -40. -45. -50. -55. -60. -65. -70. -75. -80. -85. -90. -95.-100.-105.-110.-115.-120.

-20 0 20 40X displacement (mm)

-40

-20

0

20

40

)m

m( tnemecalpsid

Y

)ged( esahP detcete

D

-180.

-150.

-120.

-90.

-60.

-30.

0.

30.

60.

90.

120.

150.

180.

Lambda/4 compensation off

Page 16: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

NA FEIC data b9, near field

NRAO FE1 band9 2007-11 Scan 77 FF Both BEAMS .txt

-20 0 20 40X displacement (mm)

-40

-20

0

20

40

)m

m( tnemecalpsid

Y

)Bd( edutilp

mA detcete

D

0. -5. -10. -15. -20. -25. -30. -35. -40. -45. -50. -55. -60. -65. -70. -75. -80. -85. -90. -95.-100.-105.-110.-115.-120.

-20 0 20 40X displacement (mm)

-40

-20

0

20

40

)m

m( tnemecalpsid

Y

)ged( esahP detcete

D

-180.

-150.

-120.

-90.

-60.

-30.

0.

30.

60.

90.

120.

150.

180.

Lambda/4 compensation needs to be looked at

Page 17: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

NA FEIC b9 far field

Aperture efficiency 63.3%, Phase center X, Y, Z: 1.32, -0.83, 289 (mm) (0,-0.94) Deg

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20X angle (Deg)

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

)geD( elgna

Y

NRAO FE1 band9 2007-11 Scan 77 FF SINGLE BEAM.txt

)Bd( edutilp

mA detcete

D

0. -4. -8. -12. -16. -20. -24. -28. -32. -36. -40. -44. -48. -52. -56. -60. -64. -68. -72. -76. -80.

{0.003, -1.4}

-10 -5 0 5 10X angle (Deg)

-10

-5

0

5

10

)geD( elgna

Y

NRAO FE1 band9 2007-11 Scan 77 FF SINGLE BEAM.txt

)Bd( edutilp

mA detcete

D

0.

-4.

-8.

-12.

-16.

-20.

-24.

-28.

-32.

-36.

-40.

-44.

-48.

-52.

-56.

-60.

-64.

-68.

-72.

-76.

-80.

{0.003, -1.4}

Aperture efficiency 65.1%, Phase center X, Y, Z: 1.32, -0.87, 292 (mm) (0, -1.40) Deg

Probe model: OEWG WR22: 33.00-50.00 GHz ?

Page 18: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

NA FEIC b7 data, near field

NRAO FE1 Band7 2007 Scan 39 Nearfield.txt

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80X displacement (mm)

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

)m

m( tnemecalpsid

Y

)Bd( edutilp

mA detcete

D

0. -5. -10. -15. -20. -25. -30. -35. -40. -45. -50. -55. -60. -65. -70. -75. -80. -85. -90. -95.-100.-105.-110.-115.-120.

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80X displacement (mm)

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

)m

m( tnemecalpsid

Y

)ged( esahP detcete

D

-180.

-150.

-120.

-90.

-60.

-30.

0.

30.

60.

90.

120.

150.

180.

Page 19: ALMA front-end beam efficiency evaluation

Mitaka, 27 Feb 2008

NA FEIC b7 data, far field

-20 -10 0 10 20X angle (Deg)

-20

-10

0

10

20

)geD( elgna

Y

NRAO FE1 Band7 2007 Scan 39 Nearfield.txt

)Bd( edutilp

mA detcete

D

0.

-4.

-8.

-12.

-16.

-20.

-24.

-28.

-32.

-36.

-40.

-44.

-48.

-52.

-56.

-60.

-64.

-68.

-72.

-76.

-80.

{1., -0.51}

-10 -5 0 5 10X angle (Deg)

-10

-5

0

5

10

)geD( elgna

Y

NRAO FE1 Band7 2007 Scan 39 Nearfield.txt

)Bd( edutilp

mA detcete

D

0.

-4.

-8.

-12.

-16.

-20.

-24.

-28.

-32.

-36.

-40.

-44.

-48.

-52.

-56.

-60.

-64.

-68.

-72.

-76.

-80.

{1., -0.51}

Aperture Efficiency 42.9, Phase center X,Y,Z -- 2.22, 5.92, 103.84 (mm)