Local Data Action Solutions Initiative 2018-2019 Microgrant Program

April 2019

Local Data Action Solutions Initiative 2018-2019 Microgrant Program

Aligning Bristol’s One City Plan with the SDGs

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWritten by Sean Fox and Allan Macleod, University of

Bristol. Editing by Sandra Ruckstuhl, Jessica Espey, and

Jay Neuner. Design by Micha Dugan, Ryan Swaney, and

Jay Neuner.

Project Team

3

ABOUTThe Local Data Action Solutions Initiative (LDA-SI) was established as a

joint effort between the Sustainable Development Solutions Network’s

Thematic Research Network on Data and Statistics (SDSN TReNDS) and the

U.S.A. Sustainable Cities Initiative as a program with one primary objective:

to identify and promote replicable methods for sub-national Sustainable

Development Goal (SDG) monitoring that facilitate local action in support

of the “leave no one behind” principle. A growing number of subnational

actors are attempting to implement the SDGs locally and are confronting

specific questions related to data collection and monitoring. With this has

grown the need for real, practical lessons and guidance that can be applied

to different contexts worldwide.

For this reason, LDA-SI launched a microgrant initiative to support learning

from existing subnational SDG data initiatives, harnessing this tacit local

knowledge and informing a learning exchange. In 2018, five grantees were

chosen both for their proven ability to support SDG implementation in a

specified location and for their model’s relevance and potential benefit for

other sub-national SDG initiatives in the world. Each grantee has prepared

a guidance brief that describes SDG localization challenges in the place

where they are operating and the data solutions they have designed to

support efforts toward SDG achievement.

Learn more at sdsntrends.org/ldasigrants.

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract............................................................................................. 5

Problem............................................................................................. 5

Solution............................................................................................. 8

Building Process............................................................................. 10

Strengths and Weaknesses......................................................... 16

References and Additional Resources..................................... 18

Annexes............................................................................................ 20

Endnotes.......................................................................................... 43

5

ABSTRACTThe City of Bristol in the United Kingdom has pledged its support to

the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and has worked to identify

alignment between the Goals and the recently launched One City Plan.

This plan articulates a vision for the city and a set of explicit targets to

be achieved by 2050. Alignment with the goals was achieved through a

12-month partnership between the University of Bristol, Bristol City Council,

and two key networks of stakeholders. Through this process, a mapping

exercise was undertaken to identify a framework for monitoring progress

against the targets embedded in both the One City Plan and the SDGs.

This process highlighted obstacles such as the paucity of local-level indi-

cators that matched the official indicators of the Inter-agency and Expert

Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDG) and the limited relevance of some

official IAEG-SDG indicators to city-level monitoring. A methodology was

developed to assess the relevance of target areas and to identify contextu-

ally-relevant local indicators and proxies to assess progress. This involved

consulting city council experts, partner organizations, civic leaders, and

academics, and has helped increase resources with which key Bristol

institutions can engage to understand the SDGs at the local level.

PROBLEMBristol is a thriving U.K. city experiencing strong economic growth1. It is

also widely seen as the UK’s most sustainable city and was awarded the

status of European Green Capital in 2015. The city has a diverse and

nationally-renowned cultural, arts, and music scene, and is frequently

voted one of the best places to live in the U.K.2 and even the world3. Yet

6

Bristol faces challenges: There are around 300 premature deaths a year

due to poor air quality; the disparity in access to higher education is almost

80 percent between local government wards; 19,700 (24 percent) of all

Bristol’s children live in income-deprived households; nearly 16 percent of

the population live in parts of the city that are in the top 10 percent of most

deprived of areas in England; and the gap in life expectancy between some

wards is as large as 12 years4.

In an effort to develop a more coherent and joined-up approach to tackling

these challenges against the backdrop of a prolonged program of budget

cuts imposed by central government, the city embarked on a major new

strategic planning initiative and reform of governance structures.

The result was Bristol’s One City Plan5 (Box 1) and new governance

arrangements designed to improve coordination between units within the

Council, and between the Council and key stakeholders in the city.

This reform moment offered a unique opportunity to align the city’s stra-

tegic One City Plan with the SDGs and develop a harmonized monitoring

framework to track progress against both. However, while there was

political will both within the Mayor’s Office and among many external stake-

holders to integrate the SDGs into the One City Plan and in a planned “city

dashboard,” there was insufficient capacity and expertise to achieve this.

Lack of capacity was compounded by the complexities of monitoring the

SDGs locally, for which there was limited freely available guidance. Aside

from the IAEG-SDG indicators (many of which are irrelevant to cities6) there

is an ever-expanding number of city sustainability metrics, but none map

perfectly to the IAEG-SDG indicator framework7.

7

In sum, Bristol faced the challenge of aligning a locally-developed strategic

plan with the SDGs and establishing a harmonized framework for monitor-

ing progress against the backdrop of acute resource and

capacity constraints.

Box 1. Bristol’s One City Plan

In January 2019 Bristol launched the first iteration of the One City Plan,

outlining the following vision:

By 2050, Bristol is a fair, healthy, and sustainable city. A city of hope and

aspiration, where everyone can share in its success.

The One City Plan was championed by the mayor and the city council and

developed through extensive consultation, including five “city gatherings”

with key city leaders across the public, private, and nonprofit sectors; over

30 engagement events with more than 300 attendees from all sectors of

society; and weekly drop-in sessions over the course of a year for resi-

dents, stakeholders, and civil servants to share their opinions on how the

plan should develop. The resulting document is meant to reflect the city’s

collective direction of progress and the current ideas as to how to move

there. However, while it is intended to be a strategic document, it is not

meant to be static. The aim is to annually update the plan through iterative

consultation to be responsive to shifting priorities, challenges, and political

change. The plan is organized around six core themes: Connectivity,

Economy, Environment, Health and Well-being, Homes and Communities,

Learning and Skills. These are not to be understood in isolation, but rather

8

SOLUTIONOur solution to these challenges involved three steps: (1) establishing

knowledge partnerships, (2) target mapping, and (3) indicator identification

and harmonization.

The first obstacle to overcome was the lack of capacity and expertise

needed to align the developing One City Plan with the SDGs and establish

a harmonized monitoring framework. This was overcome through a unique

partnership between the University of Bristol, Bristol City Council, and two

networks. The first, Bristol Green Capital Partnership, is a well established

network of over 800 organizations committed to “working towards Bristol

becoming a sustainable city with a high-quality of life for all.” The second is

a more recently established stakeholder network known

as the Bristol SDG Alliance (Box 2), devoted explicitly to promoting the

implementation and monitoring of the SDGs locally.

as interconnected. A systems thinking approach embedded in the plan

encourages leaders from these areas to understand and consider the

implications that their policies and decisions have on other themes and

objectives for the city. By considering the interrelations and interactions

within the plan in a holistic manner, decision-makers are better able

improve positive interactions and reduce the negative. This inherent inter-

relatedness of the plan lends itself to the application of the SDGs.

Box 1 continued

9

These partnerships helped to establish the capacity needed to undertake

a target mapping exercise. By applying the tool outlined in “Hacking the

SDGs for US Cities”9, which provides a methodology for understanding the

SDG targets and the IAEG-SDG indicators in the context of a city, we identi-

fied a sub-set of 75 relevant targets and 50 relevant indicators for Bristol.

The final step involved identifying specific indicators that could be used to

monitor objectives set out in the One City Plan and the SDGs.

This involved a wide-ranging review of existing city monitoring frameworks

and the identification of specific indicators that overlapped with both

One City Plan objectives and the SDGs. This has been complemented by

ongoing consultation with City Council teams responsible for delivering

these objectives and with the city’s data team to identify what data are

actually available. While this process is not complete as of this writing,

the final result will be a set of indicators suitable for monitoring both locally

defined priorities and the SDGs.

Box 2. The Bristol SDG Alliance

The Alliance is a network of 70-plus stakeholders from across Bristol who

are interested in driving the Sustainable Development Goals in Bristol.

Established at the start of 2016 after meetings to consider how the SDGs

could be applied in Bristol, the Alliance incorporates members from public,

private, and third sector organizations, including groups that focus on all

three aspects of sustainable development (economic, environmental, and

social). The Alliance has been involved in local, regional, and national

advocacy for the uptake of the SDGs more broadly and it has been key in

leveraging resource to develop SDG activity in Bristol8.

10

1

BUILDING PROCESS

Building Knowledge Partnerships

The formation of strategic partnerships began in 2016 when the Bristol SDG

Alliance submitted a proposal to the University of Bristol for a graduate

student research project. A group of students was tasked with conducting

an initial assessment of the relevance of the goals to the city and a survey

of local SDG initiatives. As a result of this report and increased interest

in understanding the SDGs in the context of Bristol, the Alliance and the

Bristol Green Capital Partnership teamed up with an academic at the uni-

versity to apply for funding to pursue further local implementation through

the creation of an SDG Research and Engagement Associate (“Associate”)

position; this aimed to provide increased capacity for the University of Bris-

tol, the City Council, and the Bristol Green Capital Partnership to engage

with the SDGs. This full-time paid position was funded for 12 months from

the university’s Strategic Research Fund. Follow-on funding to extend the

post for six months in order to produce a Voluntary Local Review (VLR) was

subsequently secured from the University’s Economic and Social Research

Council Impact Acceleration Account. The Associate position was filled

through a competitive recruitment process.

The Associate was tasked with supporting coordination among stake-

holders in the Alliance in collaboration with the Bristol Green Capital

Partnership and serving as an embedded advocate for the SDGs within the

City Council. The creation of this post was particularly important for the City

Council as it added dedicated capacity to explore integrating the SDGs into

planning and monitoring processes at a time of wide-ranging budget cuts.

11

The Associate began by reviewing existing academic and practitioner

literature on SDG localization, including those produced by the Global

Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments. The next step involved

consulting with members of the Alliance and city partners (including Bris-

tol’s European Union Office). The online publication of a report outlining

Bristol’s growing engagement with the SDGs10, which coincided with the

2018 High-level Political Forum, as well as blog posts and social media

activity helped increase awareness of the work being done in Bristol and

led to new international contacts and knowledge sharing opportunities.

Over the course of 12 months, we received invitations to attend workshops

and conferences where we were able to learn from other cities undertaking

similar initiatives at the time, such as Baltimore, Manheim, Malmö, Han-

nover, Los Angeles, New York, San José, Mexico City, Bogotá, and Nairobi.

The insights gained from this research, consultation, and networking were

used to provide direct advice and support to the City Council team working

on developing the One City Plan. The result was successful alignment of

locally generated goals with the SDGs.

Target Mapping

As the One City Plan was being developed, the Associate undertook a

mapping exercise with colleagues from the City Office team, the Council

data team and the thematic leads from the One City Plan to assess the

local relevance of SDG targets. There were two mapping stages:

First, the “Hacking the SDGs” methodology developed at the Urban

Institute11 was adapted and applied to assess the relevance of the SDG

2

12

targets to Bristol. A target was deemed relevant if city leaders could directly

influence progress through public policies, programs and initiatives.

Generally, there were three reasons why a target was deemed irrelevant:

(1) if the target focused on or was limited to developing or least developed

countries, (2) if the target explicitly referenced laws or policies at higher

levels of government, or (3) if the target addressed sustainable develop-

ment issues that occur outside urban contexts. This process, which was

undertaken early in the development of the One City Plan, identified 75

SDG targets relevant for Bristol.

Second, we identified SDG targets that were relevant to the specific objec-

tives articulated in the final One City Plan, which contains 558 initiatives,

objectives, and milestones—many of which were adapted directly from the

SDGs or aligned to the SDGs. This exercise yielded a set of 79 targets that

were directly relevant to the plan and contained most, but not all, of the 75

targets that the “Hacking the SDGs” method had identified

as relevant to Bristol. The discrepancy between the research methodology

and the applied target mapping can largely be attributed to a more expan-

sive interpretation of the SDG targets in the second round of mapping.

One such example is SDG target 9.c: “Significantly increase access to

information and communications technology [ICT] and strive to provide

universal and affordable access to the Internet in least developed countries

by 2020.” Our initial mapping excluded this target for Bristol because it

refers explicitly to “least developed countries.” However, there is a big

digital divide within Bristol, and addressing this by improving broadband

access in social housing is one of the objectives in the One City Plan.

13

While Bristol cannot monitor progress on expanding ICT in least developed

countries, it can and should monitor and report on progress in addressing

its own digital divide in the spirit of the SDG’s underlying principle of “leave

no one behind.”

In sum, an initial mapping using the “Hacking the SDGs” approach iden-

tified 75 locally relevant SDGs targets that could be monitored, while the

second mapping against the final One City Plan yielded a slightly different

set of 79 locally relevant targets when a more expansive interpretation of

the goals was applied. Although the final monitoring framework has yet to

be finalised, this latter set is likely to form the basis for Bristol’s efforts to

monitor progress against both local priorities and the SDGs.

Indicator Identification and Harmonization

Having conducted a mapping of targets, the final step was to identify

specific indicators that were suitable for monitoring the One City Plan

objectives alongside the SDGs. This was done through consultation with

the city’s data team, as well as a survey of existing city data frameworks

used elsewhere in the world. The objective was to develop a harmonized

indicator framework that allows us to monitor progress towards locally-de-

fined goals and the SDGs in a way that also facilitates comparison with

other cities around the world.

Using the Greene and Meixell methodology for identifying suitable city-

level indicators, we identified 50 out of the 244 that were relevant for

Bristol. We arrived at this figure by discounting all IAEG-SDG indicators

linked to targets that had been found irrelevant in Step 2 and reviewing

3

14

the remainder, many of which were irrelevant because of their national or

international focus. For example, while Target 13.1 (“Strengthen resilience

and adaptive capacity to climate related hazards”) is certainly relevant for

the city, two of the three associated indicators are inappropriate due to

their national and international scope.

To fill gaps in our indicator framework, we then turned our focus to the

ever-growing number of alternative urban indicator frameworks, many of

which have been mapped onto the SDGs. To generate ideas about the best

indicators for Bristol, we compared the most popular indictor frameworks to

identify overlaps, omissions, and synergy with the One City Plan objectives

and the SDGs (see Table 1).

This overlap assessment provided us with an extra set of common urban

sustainability indicators, often filling gaps left in the IAEG-SDG indicators

(e.g. Gini coefficient, Average Daily Travel time, and square meters of public

indoor/outdoor recreation space per capita). These additional 58 indicators

were added to the 50 SDG indicators previously identified to form the basis

for our monitoring framework.

15

The indicator frameworks assessed including the number of indicators they con-tain and the number of cities that are currently monitored by these frameworks.

Indicator Framework Number of Indicators Number of Cities

SDGs12 232 N/A

World Council on City Data ISO 3712013 100 79+

United Smart Cities Smart Sustainable Cities14 90 50+

IESCE Cities in motion index15 79 180

SDSN U.S.A. Cities Index16 44 100

Arcadis Sustainable Cities17 32 100

Indicators for Sustainability18 32 11

UN-Habitat City Prosperity Index19 25 400

Urban Ecosystem Europe20 25 32

Table 1. Indicator Framework

Our final step was to assess the availability of data through consultation

with the City Council’s data experts. Potential sources include council

plans and documents, Bristol’s “Quality of life” survey, the “State of Bristol”

documents, and the Bristol Open Data platform. Many of these indicators

mapped well onto the targets for the city or filled in the gaps where SDG

indicators were not relevant. In a handful of cases, we drafted our own

alternative indicators where no suitable precedent was found (Table 2). The

wording of these was designed (a) to be suitable to the city scale, and (b) to

reflect the fact that progress is not necessarily the sole responsibility of city

governments by referring to “policies or initiatives.”

Using the SDG targets that had been mapped onto local priority aims,

proxy measurements were developed in place of irrelevant or unrecorded

IAEG-SDG indicators. Using the indicators that local experts were already

16

monitoring and that the city was already assessing made it easier to under-

stand the progress the city was making towards the SDGs through indirect

measures. The final proposed indicator framework is provided in Annex A.

SDG Target Alternative Indicator

5.6 Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and the Beijing Platform for Action and the outcome documents of their review conferences

Have new policies or initiatives been implemented in Bristol to improve access to sexual and reproductive health care?

5.c Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at all levels

Have new policies or initiatives been implemented to improve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls in Bristol?

13.2 Integrate climate change measures into (national) policies, strategies and planning

Have new climate change policies or initiatives been introduced by city stakeholders?

15.9 By 2020, integrate ecosystem and biodiversity values into national and local planning, development processes, poverty reduction strategies and accounts

Have new ecosystem and biodiversity values been integrated into planning processes or development initiatives in Bristol?

17.17 Encourage and promote effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships, building on the experience and resourcing strategies of partnerships

Have new public, public-private and civil society partnerships formed in Bristol to enhance capacity to achieve local sustainability goals?

Table 2. Alternative Indicators to Monitor Specific Targets

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSESStrengths

The integration of the SDGs into the One City Plan and the development of

a harmonized indicator framework was made possible through partnerships

and the creation of a dedicated post funded by the University of Bristol.

For other cities facing similarly acute resource constraints, leveraging

partnerships may be the only means of securing the resources required to

overcome the considerable “learning costs” associated with developing a

practical framework for monitoring the SDGs locally.

17

A second strength of our approach was the harmonization of the

monitoring framework achieved by identifying indicators that were directly

relevant to locally defined objectives as well as the SDGs. This will institu-

tionalize SDG monitoring going forward as it will not require a separate or

additional activity for the Council. Moreover, the process of harmonization

required extensive consultation, which increased awareness of the SDGs

within the council.

Finally, adopting a more expansive interpretation of the SDG targets and

drawing on alternative indicator frameworks to fill gaps where IAEG-SDG

indicators were simply irrelevant has allowed for the development of a

framework that is both comprehensive and locally appropriate. Moreover,

because the alternative indicators were drawn from indicators already in

use by many other cities, this will increase comparability between Bristol

and other cities.

Weaknesses

Like many cities, the functional area of Bristol is much larger than

the area controlled and monitored by Bristol City Council. The City of

Bristol has a population of roughly a half million people. However, the

functional area of the city is over one million people. Monitoring progress

towards the SDGs in the core could be highly misleading. For example, a

reduction in homelessness in the City of Bristol could correspond with an

increase in a local authority area that is just meters away. Resolving the

appropriate geographic scale of measurement for local monitoring is an

unresolved challenge.

18

A second weakness relates to the limited consultation on data sources,

largely due to time and resource constraints. We know that “official” data

developed and curated by the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics has

significant limitations and omissions. Although we did look at other sources,

there is likely a wealth of information being collected by firms and nonprofit

organizations that could provide more granular insight into changes directly

relevant to the SDG progress. Expanding the sources of data used for

local monitoring could greatly enrich our understanding of relevant local

conditions and trends, as evidenced by the work of the Sustainable Devel-

opment Solutions Network’s Local Data Action grantees.

REFERENCES AND ADDITIONAL RESOURCESAmbiente Italia. 2007. “Urban Ecosystem Europe: An Integrated Assess-

ment on the Sustainability of 32 European Cities.” http://www.dexia.com/

EN/journalist/press_releases/Documents/20080201_urban_ecosys-

tem_UK.pdf.

Ahvenniemi, Hannele, Aapo Huovila, Isabel Pinto-Seppä, and Miimu

Airaksinen. 2017. “What Are the Differences between Sustainable and

Smart Cities?” Cities 60 (February): 234–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cit-

ies.2016.09.009.

Arcadis. 2016. “Sustainable Cities Index 2016.” https://www.arcadis.com/

media/0/6/6/%7B06687980-3179-47AD-89FD-F6AFA76EBB73%7DSustain-

able%20Cities%20Index%202016%20Global%20Web.pdf.

BBC News. 2017. “Bristol Named Best Place to Live in Britain in 2017.”

March 19, 2017. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-39320118.

19

Bristol City Office. 2019. “One City Plan.” Bristol. https://www.bristolonecity.

com/one-city-plan.

Espey, Jessica, Hayden Dahmm, Laurie Manderino, John Biberman, Yingxin

Ye, Gary Verburg, and Juan Puyana. 2018. “Leaving No U.S. City Behind:

The U.S. Cities Sustainable Development Goals Index 2018.” http://unsdsn.

org/resources/publications/leaving-no-u-s-city-behind-the-2018-u-s-cities-

sdgs-index.

McCarney, Patricia, James Patava, Birgitte Hansen, Matthew Lynch, Sahifa

Imran, and Nicholas Bakewell. 2017. “WCCD City Data for the United

Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2017.” Toronto: World Council on

City Data (WCCD). https://www.dataforcities.org/publications.

United for Smart Sustainable Cities. 2018. “United for Smart Sustainable

Cities: United Smart Cities Index.” https://www.itu.int/en/publications/Docu-

ments/tsb/2017-U4SSC-Collection-Methodology/mobile/index.html.

20

AN

NEX

SDG

SDG

Tar

get

Indi

cato

r In

dica

tor 2

Indi

cato

r 3In

dica

tor 4

Indi

cato

r 5So

urce

1So

urce

2So

urce

3So

urce

4So

urce

5

1.2 B

y 20

30, r

educ

e at

le

ast b

y ha

lf th

e pr

opor

tion

of m

en,

wom

en a

nd c

hild

ren

of

all a

ges

livin

g in

po

verty

in a

ll its

di

men

sion

s ac

cord

ing

to n

atio

nal d

efin

ition

s

1.2.1

Prop

ortio

n of

po

pula

tion

livin

g be

low

the

natio

nal

pove

rty li

ne, b

y se

x an

d ag

e

1.2.2

Pro

porti

on o

f m

en, w

omen

and

ch

ildre

n of

all

ages

livi

ng in

po

verty

in a

ll its

di

men

sion

s ac

cord

ing

to

natio

nal d

efin

ition

s

Redu

ce th

e ga

p in

ea

rnin

gs

betw

een

the

top

10%

and

bo

ttom

10%

of

wag

es

SDG

s/Ci

ty

Sust

aina

bilit

y In

dexe

sSD

Gs

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

1.3 Im

plem

ent n

atio

nally

ap

prop

riate

soc

ial

prot

ectio

n sy

stem

s an

d m

easu

res

for a

ll,

incl

udin

g flo

ors,

and

by

2030

ach

ieve

su

bsta

ntia

l cov

erag

e of

th

e po

or a

nd th

e vu

lner

able

1.3.1

Prop

ortio

n of

po

pula

tion

cove

red

by s

ocia

l pro

tect

ion

floor

s/sy

stem

s, b

y se

x, d

istin

guis

hing

ch

ildre

n,

unem

ploy

ed

pers

ons,

old

er

pers

ons,

per

sons

w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s,

preg

nant

wom

en,

new

born

s, w

ork-

inju

ry v

ictim

s an

d th

e po

or a

nd th

e vu

lner

able

SDG

s 1.5

By

2030

, bui

ld th

e re

silie

nce

of th

e po

or

and

thos

e in

vul

nera

ble

situ

atio

ns a

nd re

duce

th

eir e

xpos

ure

and

vuln

erab

ility

to c

limat

e-re

late

d ex

trem

e ev

ents

an

d ot

her e

cono

mic

, so

cial

and

en

viro

nmen

tal s

hock

s an

d di

sast

ers

11.5

.2 D

irect

ec

onom

ic lo

ss in

re

latio

n to

glo

bal

GD

P, d

amag

e to

cr

itica

l inf

rast

ruct

ure

and

num

ber o

f di

srup

tions

to b

asic

se

rvic

es, a

ttrib

uted

to

dis

aste

rs

Num

ber o

f di

sast

er re

late

d de

aths

per

100

000

popu

latio

nSD

Gs

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

SDG

1: N

o Po

vert

y

Indi

cato

r Fra

mew

ork

21

2.1 B

y 20

30, e

nd

hung

er a

nd e

nsur

e ac

cess

by

all p

eopl

e, in

pa

rticu

lar t

he p

oor a

nd

peop

le in

vul

nera

ble

situ

atio

ns, i

nclu

ding

in

fant

s, to

saf

e, n

utrit

ious

an

d su

ffici

ent f

ood

all

year

roun

d

num

ber o

f mis

sing

m

eals

per

per

son

(mea

l gap

)

Num

ber o

f peo

ple

expe

rienc

ing

food

in

secu

rity

Redu

ce fo

od

pove

rty

(def

initi

on fr

om

Qua

lity

of L

ife

surv

ey)

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

2.2

By 2

030,

end

all

form

s of

mal

nutri

tion,

in

clud

ing

achi

evin

g, b

y 20

25, t

he in

tern

atio

nally

ag

reed

targ

ets

on

stun

ting

and

was

ting

in

child

ren

unde

r 5 y

ears

of

age

, and

add

ress

the

nutri

tiona

l nee

ds o

f ad

oles

cent

girl

s,

preg

nant

and

lact

atin

g w

omen

and

old

er

pers

ons

% o

besi

ty a

nd

over

wei

ght i

n ch

ildre

n in

Yea

r 6

% c

hild

ren

atte

ndin

g sc

hool

hu

ngry

Hap

py C

ity

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

2.4

By 2

030,

ens

ure

sust

aina

ble

food

pr

oduc

tion

syst

ems

and

impl

emen

t res

ilien

t ag

ricul

tura

l pra

ctic

es

that

incr

ease

pr

oduc

tivity

and

pr

oduc

tion,

that

hel

p m

aint

ain

ecos

yste

ms,

th

at s

treng

then

cap

acity

fo

r ada

ptat

ion

to c

limat

e ch

ange

, ext

rem

e w

eath

er, d

roug

ht,

flood

ing

and

othe

r di

sast

ers

and

that

pr

ogre

ssiv

ely

impr

ove

land

and

soi

l qua

lity

2.4.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f ag

ricul

tura

l are

a un

der p

rodu

ctiv

e an

d su

stai

nabl

e ag

ricul

ture

SDG

s

SDG

2:

Zero

H

unge

r

22

3.1 B

y 20

30, r

educ

e th

e gl

obal

mat

erna

l m

orta

lity

ratio

to le

ss

than

70

per 1

00,0

00

live

birth

s3.

1.1 M

ater

nal

mor

talit

y ra

tioSD

Gs

3.2

By 2

030,

end

pr

even

tabl

e de

aths

of

new

born

s an

d ch

ildre

n un

der 5

 yea

rs o

f age

, w

ith a

ll co

untri

es a

imin

g to

redu

ce n

eona

tal

mor

talit

y to

at l

east

as

low

as

12 p

er 1,

000

live

birth

s an

d un

der-5

m

orta

lity

to a

t lea

st a

s lo

w a

s 25

per

1,00

0 liv

e bi

rths

3.2.

1 Und

er-5

m

orta

lity

rate

SDG

s

3.3

By 2

030,

end

the

epid

emic

s of

AID

S,

tube

rcul

osis

, mal

aria

an

d ne

glec

ted

tropi

cal

dise

ases

and

com

bat

hepa

titis

, wat

er-b

orne

di

seas

es a

nd o

ther

co

mm

unic

able

dis

ease

s

3.3.

1 Num

ber o

f new

H

IV in

fect

ions

per

1,0

00 u

ninf

ecte

d po

pula

tion,

by

sex,

ag

e an

d ke

y po

pula

tions

3.3.

2 Tu

berc

ulos

is

inci

denc

e pe

r 10

0,00

0 po

pula

tion

SDG

s SD

Gs

3.4

By 2

030,

redu

ce b

y on

e th

ird p

rem

atur

e m

orta

lity

from

non

-co

mm

unic

able

dis

ease

s th

roug

h pr

even

tion

and

treat

men

t and

pro

mot

e m

enta

l hea

lth a

nd w

ell-

bein

g

Year

s of

Pot

entia

l Li

fe L

ost –

an

age

and

sex

stan

dard

ised

m

easu

re o

f pr

emat

ure

deat

h

Mor

talit

y fro

m

caus

es th

at a

re

prev

enta

ble

Hap

py C

ityH

appy

City

SDG

3:

Goo

d H

ealth

an

d W

ellb

eing

23

3.5

Stre

ngth

en th

e pr

even

tion

and

treat

men

t of s

ubst

ance

ab

use,

incl

udin

g na

rcot

ic d

rug

abus

e an

d ha

rmfu

l use

of a

lcoh

ol

Initi

ativ

es ta

ken

or

supp

orte

d to

en

gage

peo

ple

in

heal

th in

terv

entio

ns

(e.g

. sto

p sm

okin

g,

obes

ity, a

lcoh

olis

m,

drug

s, e

tc) o

r w

ellb

eing

initi

ativ

es

in th

e co

mm

unity

, in

clud

ing

phys

ical

3.5.

1 Cov

erag

e of

tre

atm

ent

inte

rven

tions

(p

harm

acol

ogic

al,

psyc

hoso

cial

and

re

habi

litat

ion

and

afte

rcar

e se

rvic

es)

for s

ubst

ance

use

di

sord

ers

3.5.

2 H

arm

ful

use

of a

lcoh

ol,

defin

ed

acco

rdin

g to

th

e na

tiona

l co

ntex

t as

alco

hol p

er

capi

ta

cons

umpt

ion

(age

d 15

 yea

rs

and

olde

r) w

ithin

a

cale

ndar

yea

r in

litre

s of

pu

re a

lcoh

olSV

PSD

Gs

SDG

s

3.6

By 2

020,

hal

ve th

e nu

mbe

r of g

loba

l de

aths

and

inju

ries

from

ro

ad tr

affic

acc

iden

ts

Dea

ths

and

inju

ries

from

road

traf

fic

acci

dent

s

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

3.7

By 2

030,

ens

ure

univ

ersa

l acc

ess

to

sexu

al a

nd

repr

oduc

tive

heal

th-

care

ser

vice

s, in

clud

ing

for f

amily

pla

nnin

g,

info

rmat

ion

and

educ

atio

n, a

nd th

e in

tegr

atio

n of

re

prod

uctiv

e he

alth

into

na

tiona

l stra

tegi

es a

nd

prog

ram

mes

3.7.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f w

omen

of

repr

oduc

tive

age

(age

d 15

–49 

year

s)

who

hav

e th

eir

need

for f

amily

pl

anni

ng s

atis

fied

with

mod

ern

met

hods

3.7.

2 Ad

oles

cent

bi

rth ra

te (a

ged

10–1

4 ye

ars;

age

d 15

–19 

year

s) p

er

1,000

wom

en in

th

at a

ge g

roup

SDG

s SD

Gs

3.8

Achi

eve

univ

ersa

l he

alth

cov

erag

e,

incl

udin

g fin

anci

al ri

sk

prot

ectio

n, a

cces

s to

qu

ality

ess

entia

l hea

lth-

care

ser

vice

s an

d ac

cess

to s

afe,

ef

fect

ive,

qua

lity

and

affo

rdab

le e

ssen

tial

med

icin

es a

nd v

acci

nes

for a

ll

3.b.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f th

e ta

rget

po

pula

tion

cove

red

by a

ll va

ccin

es

incl

uded

in th

eir

natio

nal p

rogr

amm

e

Gap

in h

ealth

y lif

e ex

pect

ancy

be

twee

n th

e m

ost

and

leas

t de

priv

ed a

reas

of

Bris

tol

SDG

s

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

SDG

3:

Goo

d H

ealth

an

d W

ellb

eing

24

3.9

By 2

030,

su

bsta

ntia

lly re

duce

the

num

ber o

f dea

ths

and

illne

sses

from

ha

zard

ous

chem

ical

s an

d ai

r, w

ater

and

soi

l po

llutio

n an

d co

ntam

inat

ion

3.9.

1 Mor

talit

y ra

te

attri

bute

d to

ho

useh

old

and

ambi

ent a

ir po

llutio

n

Vehi

cles

em

issi

ons:

Dea

ths

attri

buta

ble

to a

ir po

llutio

n / l

evel

s of

NO

2SD

Gs

Them

e le

ads

3.a

Stre

ngth

en th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of th

e W

orld

Hea

lth

Org

aniz

atio

n Fr

amew

ork

Conv

entio

n on

Tob

acco

Con

trol i

n al

l cou

ntrie

s, a

s ap

prop

riate

Initi

ativ

es ta

ken

or

supp

orte

d to

en

gage

peo

ple

in

heal

th in

terv

entio

ns

(e.g

. sto

p sm

okin

g,

obes

ity, a

lcoh

olis

m,

drug

s, e

tc) o

r w

ellb

eing

initi

ativ

es

in th

e co

mm

unity

, in

clud

ing

phys

ical

SV

P

SDG

3:

Goo

d H

ealth

an

d W

ellb

eing

25

3.b

Supp

ort t

he

rese

arch

and

de

velo

pmen

t of

vacc

ines

and

med

icin

es

for t

he c

omm

unic

able

an

d no

n-co

mm

unic

able

di

seas

es th

at p

rimar

ily

affe

ct d

evel

opin

g co

untri

es, p

rovi

de

acce

ss to

affo

rdab

le

esse

ntia

l med

icin

es a

nd

vacc

ines

, in

acco

rdan

ce

with

the

Doh

a D

ecla

ratio

n on

the

TRIP

S Ag

reem

ent a

nd

Publ

ic H

ealth

, whi

ch

affir

ms

the

right

of

deve

lopi

ng c

ount

ries

to

use

to th

e fu

ll th

e pr

ovis

ions

in th

e Ag

reem

ent o

n Tr

ade-

Rela

ted

Aspe

cts

of

Inte

llect

ual P

rope

rty

Righ

ts re

gard

ing

flexi

bilit

ies

to p

rote

ct

publ

ic h

ealth

, and

, in

parti

cula

r, pr

ovid

e ac

cess

to m

edic

ines

for

all

Rate

of

inap

prop

riate

pr

escr

ibin

g of

an

tibio

tics

3.b.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f th

e ta

rget

po

pula

tion

cove

red

by a

ll va

ccin

es in

clud

ed

in th

eir n

atio

nal

prog

ram

me

OCP

SDG

s

4.1 B

y 20

30, e

nsur

e th

at

all g

irls

and

boys

co

mpl

ete

free,

eq

uita

ble

and

qual

ity

prim

ary

and

seco

ndar

y ed

ucat

ion

lead

ing

to

rele

vant

and

effe

ctiv

e le

arni

ng o

utco

mes

4.1.1

Pro

porti

on o

f ch

ildre

n an

d yo

ung

peop

le (a

) in

grad

es 2

/3; (

b) a

t th

e en

d of

prim

ary;

an

d (c

) at t

he e

nd o

f lo

wer

sec

onda

ry

achi

evin

g at

leas

t a

min

imum

pro

ficie

ncy

leve

l in

(i) re

adin

g an

d (ii

) mat

hem

atic

s,

by s

ex

% o

f stu

dent

s co

mpl

etin

g se

cond

ary

educ

atio

n: s

urvi

val

rate

% o

f chi

ldre

n ac

hiev

ing

8 G

CSEs

(a

ttain

men

t 8

scor

e) –

br

oken

dow

n by

are

as o

f de

priv

atio

n

Key

Stag

e 4:

At

tain

men

t 8 -

Redu

ce th

e Po

ints

gap

be

twee

n th

e D

isad

vant

aged

and

Non

-D

isad

vant

aged

SD

Gs

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

SDG

4:

Qua

lity

Educ

atio

n

SDG

3:

Goo

d H

ealth

an

d W

ellb

eing

26

4.2

By 2

030,

ens

ure

that

al

l girl

s an

d bo

ys h

ave

acce

ss to

qua

lity

early

ch

ildho

od

deve

lopm

ent,

care

and

pr

e-pr

imar

y ed

ucat

ion

so th

at th

ey a

re re

ady

for p

rimar

y ed

ucat

ion

4.2.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f ch

ildre

n un

der

5 ye

ars

of a

ge w

ho

are

deve

lopm

enta

lly o

n tra

ck in

hea

lth,

lear

ning

and

ps

ycho

soci

al w

ell-

bein

g, b

y se

x

4.2.

2 Pa

rtici

patio

n ra

te in

org

aniz

ed

lear

ning

(one

yea

r be

fore

the

offic

ial

prim

ary

entry

age

), by

sex

A re

duct

ion

in

the

gap

betw

een

child

ren

in th

e 30

% m

ost

depr

ived

ar

eas

achi

evin

g a

good

leve

l of

deve

lopm

ent

at E

arly

Yea

rs

foun

datio

n st

age

com

pare

d to

th

ose

not i

n

Diff

eren

ces

in s

choo

l re

adin

ess

betw

een

boys

and

gi

rls; f

or

child

ren

with

En

glis

h as

a

seco

nd

lang

uage

; an

d BM

E ch

ildre

n.SD

Gs/

Hap

py

City

SDG

s

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

4.3

By 2

030,

ens

ure

equa

l acc

ess

for a

ll w

omen

and

men

to

affo

rdab

le a

nd q

ualit

y te

chni

cal,

voca

tiona

l and

te

rtiar

y ed

ucat

ion,

in

clud

ing

univ

ersi

ty

num

ber o

f hig

her

educ

atio

n de

gree

s pe

r 100

000

po

pula

tion

% o

f sch

ool

leav

ers

iden

tifie

d as

not

in e

duca

tion

empl

oym

ent o

r tra

inin

g.

% o

f you

ng

peop

le

ente

ring

furth

er o

r hi

gher

ed

ucat

ion.

% o

f you

ng

peop

le

ente

ring

jobs

with

tra

inin

g

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

4.4

By 2

030,

su

bsta

ntia

lly in

crea

se

the

num

ber o

f you

th a

nd

adul

ts w

ho h

ave

rele

vant

ski

lls, i

nclu

ding

te

chni

cal a

nd v

ocat

iona

l sk

ills,

for e

mpl

oym

ent,

dece

nt jo

bs a

nd

entre

pren

eurs

hip

% o

f you

ng p

eopl

e ac

cess

ing

appr

entic

eshi

ps

% o

f you

ng

peop

le e

nter

ing

furth

er o

r hig

her

educ

atio

n.

% o

f adu

lts

with

out a

full

Leve

l 2

qual

ifica

tion

(equ

ival

ent t

o 5

GCS

Es)

% o

f you

ng

peop

le

ente

ring

jobs

with

tra

inin

g

% o

f adu

lts

who

hav

e pa

rtici

pate

d in

edu

catio

n or

trai

ning

in

the

last

four

w

eeks

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

Hap

py C

ity4.

5 By

203

0, e

limin

ate

gend

er d

ispa

ritie

s in

ed

ucat

ion

and

ensu

re

equa

l acc

ess

to a

ll le

vels

of e

duca

tion

and

voca

tiona

l tra

inin

g fo

r th

e vu

lner

able

, in

clud

ing

pers

ons

with

di

sabi

litie

s, in

dige

nous

pe

ople

s an

d ch

ildre

n in

vu

lner

able

situ

atio

ns

4.2.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f ch

ildre

n un

der

5 ye

ars

of a

ge w

ho

are

deve

lopm

enta

lly o

n tra

ck in

hea

lth,

lear

ning

and

ps

ycho

soci

al w

ell-

bein

g, b

y se

x

4.2.

2 Pa

rtici

patio

n ra

te in

org

aniz

ed

lear

ning

(one

yea

r be

fore

the

offic

ial

prim

ary

entry

age

), by

sex

% o

f fem

ale

scho

ol-a

ged

popu

latio

n in

sc

hool

/% o

f m

ale

scho

ol-

aged

po

pula

tion

enro

lled

in

scho

ols

SDG

sSD

Gs

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

SDG

4:

Qua

lity

Educ

atio

n

27

4.6

By 2

030,

ens

ure

that

al

l you

th a

nd a

su

bsta

ntia

l pro

porti

on

of a

dults

, bot

h m

en a

nd

wom

en, a

chie

ve li

tera

cy

and

num

erac

y

4.6.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f po

pula

tion

in a

gi

ven

age

grou

p ac

hiev

ing

at le

ast a

fix

ed le

vel o

f pr

ofic

ienc

y in

fu

nctio

nal (

a) li

tera

cy

and

(b) n

umer

acy

skill

s, b

y se

x

SDG

s/Ci

ty

Sust

aina

bilit

y Inde

xes/

Ha

ppy

City

4.7

By 2

030,

ens

ure

that

al

l lea

rner

s ac

quire

the

know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills

need

ed to

pro

mot

e su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t, in

clud

ing,

am

ong

othe

rs, t

hrou

gh

educ

atio

n fo

r su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t and

su

stai

nabl

e lif

esty

les,

hu

man

righ

ts, g

ende

r eq

ualit

y, p

rom

otio

n of

a

cultu

re o

f pea

ce a

nd

non-

viol

ence

, glo

bal

citiz

ensh

ip a

nd

appr

ecia

tion

of c

ultu

ral

dive

rsity

and

of

cultu

re’s

con

tribu

tion

to

sust

aina

ble

deve

lopm

ent

4.7.

1 Ext

ent t

o w

hich

(i)

glo

bal c

itize

nshi

p ed

ucat

ion

and

(ii)

educ

atio

n fo

r su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t, in

clud

ing

gend

er

equa

lity

and

hum

an

right

s, a

re

mai

nstre

amed

at a

ll le

vels

in (a

) nat

iona

l ed

ucat

ion

polic

ies;

(b

) cur

ricul

a;

(c) t

each

er

educ

atio

n; a

nd (d

) st

uden

t ass

essm

ent

SDG

s

5.1 E

nd a

ll fo

rms

of

disc

rimin

atio

n ag

ains

t all

wom

en a

nd g

irls

ever

ywhe

re

5.5.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f se

ats

held

by

wom

en in

(a)

natio

nal p

arlia

men

ts

and

(b) l

ocal

go

vern

men

ts

5.5.

2 Pr

opor

tion

of w

omen

in

man

ager

ial

posi

tions

SDG

sSD

Gs

SDG

4:

Qua

lity

Educ

atio

n

SDG

5:

Gen

der

Equa

lity

28

5.2

Elim

inat

e al

l for

ms

of v

iole

nce

agai

nst a

ll w

omen

and

girl

s in

the

publ

ic a

nd p

rivat

e sp

here

s, in

clud

ing

traffi

ckin

g an

d se

xual

an

d ot

her t

ypes

of

expl

oita

tion

5.2.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f ev

er-p

artn

ered

w

omen

and

girl

s ag

ed 15

 yea

rs a

nd

olde

r sub

ject

ed to

ph

ysic

al, s

exua

l or

psyc

holo

gica

l vi

olen

ce b

y a

curr

ent o

r for

mer

in

timat

e pa

rtner

in

the

prev

ious

12

mon

ths,

by

form

of

viol

ence

and

by

age

5.2.

2 Pr

opor

tion

of w

omen

and

gi

rls a

ged

15 y

ears

and

old

er

subj

ecte

d to

se

xual

vio

lenc

e by

pe

rson

s ot

her t

han

an in

timat

e pa

rtner

in

the

prev

ious

12

 mon

ths,

by

age

and

plac

e of

oc

curr

ence

SDG

sSD

Gs

5.3

Elim

inat

e al

l har

mfu

l pr

actic

es, s

uch

as c

hild

, ea

rly a

nd fo

rced

m

arria

ge a

nd fe

mal

e ge

nita

l mut

ilatio

n

5.3.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f w

omen

age

d 20

–24 

year

s w

ho

wer

e m

arrie

d or

in

a un

ion

befo

re a

ge

15 a

nd b

efor

e ag

e 18

5.3.

2 Pr

opor

tion

of g

irls

and

wom

en a

ged

15–4

9 ye

ars

who

ha

ve u

nder

gone

fe

mal

e ge

nita

l m

utila

tion/

cutti

ng,

by a

geSD

Gs

SDG

s/O

CP5.

4 Re

cogn

ize

and

valu

e un

paid

car

e an

d do

mes

tic w

ork

thro

ugh

the

prov

isio

n of

pub

lic

serv

ices

, inf

rast

ruct

ure

and

soci

al p

rote

ctio

n po

licie

s an

d th

e pr

omot

ion

of s

hare

d re

spon

sibi

lity

with

in th

e ho

useh

old

and

the

fam

ily a

s na

tiona

lly

appr

opria

te

5.4.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f tim

e sp

ent o

n un

paid

dom

estic

an

d ca

re w

ork,

by

sex,

age

and

lo

catio

nSD

Gs

5.5

Ensu

re w

omen

’s fu

ll an

d ef

fect

ive

parti

cipa

tion

and

equa

l op

portu

nitie

s fo

r le

ader

ship

at a

ll le

vels

of

dec

isio

n-m

akin

g in

po

litic

al, e

cono

mic

and

pu

blic

life

5.5.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f se

ats

held

by

wom

en in

(a)

natio

nal p

arlia

men

ts

and

(b) l

ocal

go

vern

men

ts

5.5.

2 Pr

opor

tion

of w

omen

in

man

ager

ial

posi

tions

SDG

sSD

Gs

SDG

5:

Gen

der

Equa

lity

29

5.6

Ensu

re u

nive

rsal

ac

cess

to s

exua

l and

re

prod

uctiv

e he

alth

and

re

prod

uctiv

e rig

hts

as

agre

ed in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Prog

ram

me

of

Actio

n of

the

Inte

rnat

iona

l Co

nfer

ence

on

Popu

latio

n an

d D

evel

opm

ent a

nd th

e Be

ijing

Pla

tform

for

Actio

n an

d th

e ou

tcom

e do

cum

ents

of t

heir

revi

ew c

onfe

renc

es

Hav

e ne

w p

olic

ies

or in

itiat

ives

bee

n im

plem

ente

d in

Br

isto

l to

impr

ove

acce

ss to

sex

ual

and

repr

oduc

tive

heal

th c

are?

Alte

rnat

ive

Indi

cato

r 5.

c Ad

opt a

nd

stre

ngth

en s

ound

po

licie

s an

d en

forc

eabl

e le

gisl

atio

n fo

r the

pro

mot

ion

of

gend

er e

qual

ity a

nd th

e em

pow

erm

ent o

f all

wom

en a

nd g

irls

at a

ll le

vels

Hav

e ne

w p

olic

ies

or in

itiat

ives

bee

n im

plem

ente

d to

im

prov

e ge

nder

eq

ualit

y an

d th

e em

pow

erm

ent o

f all

wom

en a

nd g

irls

in

Bris

tol?

Alte

rnat

ive

Indi

cato

r 6.

3 By

203

0, im

prov

e w

ater

qua

lity

by

redu

cing

pol

lutio

n,

elim

inat

ing

dum

ping

and

m

inim

izin

g re

leas

e of

ha

zard

ous

chem

ical

s an

d m

ater

ials

, hal

ving

th

e pr

opor

tion

of

untre

ated

was

tew

ater

an

d su

bsta

ntia

lly

incr

easi

ng re

cycl

ing

and

safe

reus

e gl

obal

ly

6.3.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f w

aste

wat

er s

afel

y tre

ated

6.3.

2 Pr

opor

tion

of b

odie

s of

wat

er

with

goo

d am

bien

t w

ater

qua

lity

(Eco

logi

cal S

tatu

s of

Bris

tol W

ater

Ca

tchm

ent)

SDG

s/Ci

ty

Sust

aina

bilit

y In

dexe

s

SDG

s/O

ne

City

Pla

n Th

eme

Lead

s

SDG

5:

Gen

der

Equa

lity

SDG

6:

Clea

n W

ater

and

Sa

nita

tion

30

6.4

By 2

030,

su

bsta

ntia

lly in

crea

se

wat

er-u

se e

ffici

ency

ac

ross

all

sect

ors

and

ensu

re s

usta

inab

le

with

draw

als

and

supp

ly

of fr

eshw

ater

to

addr

ess

wat

er s

carc

ity

and

subs

tant

ially

redu

ce

the

num

ber o

f peo

ple

suffe

ring

from

wat

er

scar

city

6.4.

1 Cha

nge

in

wat

er-u

se e

ffici

ency

ov

er ti

me

6.4.

2 Le

vel o

f w

ater

stre

ss:

fresh

wat

er

with

draw

al a

s a

prop

ortio

n of

av

aila

ble

fresh

wat

er

reso

urce

sSD

Gs

SDG

s7.

1 By

2030

, ens

ure

univ

ersa

l acc

ess

to

affo

rdab

le, r

elia

ble

and

mod

ern

ener

gy

serv

ices

7.1.2

Pro

porti

on o

f po

pula

tion

with

pr

imar

y re

lianc

e on

cl

ean

fuel

s an

d te

chno

logy

Tota

l Ele

ctric

al

ener

gy u

se p

er

capi

ta (r

esid

enta

l +

city

wid

e)

SDG

s

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

7.2

By 2

030,

incr

ease

su

bsta

ntia

lly th

e sh

are

of re

new

able

ene

rgy

in

the

glob

al e

nerg

y m

ix

7.2.

1 Ren

ewab

le

ener

gy s

hare

in th

e to

tal f

inal

ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

SDG

s/Ci

ty

Sust

aina

bilit

y In

dexe

s7.

3 By

203

0, d

oubl

e th

e gl

obal

rate

of

impr

ovem

ent i

n en

ergy

ef

ficie

ncy

7.3.

1 Ene

rgy

inte

nsity

mea

sure

d in

term

s of

prim

ary

ener

gy a

nd G

DP

SDG

s8.

1 Sus

tain

per

cap

ita

econ

omic

gro

wth

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

natio

nal c

ircum

stan

ces

and,

in p

artic

ular

, at

leas

t 7 p

er c

ent g

ross

do

mes

tic p

rodu

ct

grow

th p

er a

nnum

in th

e le

ast d

evel

oped

co

untri

esG

VA

GVA

gro

wth

rate

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads/

SD

Gs

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

/ SD

Gs

SDG

7:

Affo

rdab

le

and

Clea

n En

ergy

SDG

8:

Dec

ent

wor

k an

d Ec

onom

ic

Gro

wth

SDG

6:

Clea

n W

ater

and

Sa

nita

tion

31

8.2

Achi

eve

high

er

leve

ls o

f eco

nom

ic

prod

uctiv

ity th

roug

h di

vers

ifica

tion,

te

chno

logi

cal

upgr

adin

g an

d in

nova

tion,

incl

udin

g th

roug

h a

focu

s on

hig

h-va

lue

adde

d an

d la

bour

-in

tens

ive

sect

ors

8.2.

1 Ann

ual g

row

th

rate

of r

eal G

VA p

er

empl

oyed

per

son

SDG

s

8.3

Prom

ote

deve

lopm

ent-o

rient

ed

polic

ies

that

sup

port

prod

uctiv

e ac

tiviti

es,

dece

nt jo

b cr

eatio

n,

entre

pren

eurs

hip,

cr

eativ

ity a

nd

inno

vatio

n, a

nd

enco

urag

e th

e fo

rmal

izat

ion

and

grow

th o

f mic

ro-,

smal

l- an

d m

ediu

m-s

ized

en

terp

rises

, inc

ludi

ng

thro

ugh

acce

ss to

fin

anci

al s

ervi

ces

City

’s

unem

ploy

men

t rat

e

Num

ber o

f bu

sine

sses

per

10

0 00

0 po

pula

tion

Incr

ease

d nu

mbe

r of

busi

ness

sta

rt-up

s in

de

priv

ed

area

s

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

SDG

8:

Dec

ent

wor

k an

d Ec

onom

ic

Gro

wth

32

8.4

Impr

ove

prog

ress

ivel

y, th

roug

h 20

30, g

loba

l res

ourc

e ef

ficie

ncy

in

cons

umpt

ion

and

prod

uctio

n an

d en

deav

our t

o de

coup

le

econ

omic

gro

wth

from

en

viro

nmen

tal

degr

adat

ion,

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

e 10-Y

ear F

ram

ewor

k of

Pr

ogra

mm

es o

n Su

stai

nabl

e Co

nsum

ptio

n an

d Pr

oduc

tion,

with

de

velo

ped

coun

tries

ta

king

the

lead

8.4.

1 Mat

eria

l fo

otpr

int,

mat

eria

l fo

otpr

int p

er c

apita

, an

d m

ater

ial

foot

prin

t per

GD

PSD

Gs

8.5

By 2

030,

ach

ieve

fu

ll an

d pr

oduc

tive

empl

oym

ent a

nd d

ecen

t w

ork

for a

ll w

omen

and

m

en, i

nclu

ding

for

youn

g pe

ople

and

pe

rson

s w

ith

disa

bilit

ies,

and

equ

al

pay

for w

ork

of e

qual

va

lue

8.5.

1 Ave

rage

ho

urly

ear

ning

s of

fe

mal

e an

d m

ale

empl

oyee

s, b

y oc

cupa

tion,

age

and

pe

rson

s w

ith

disa

bilit

ies

8.5.

2 U

nem

ploy

men

t ra

te, b

y se

x, a

ge

and

pers

ons

with

di

sabi

litie

s

Diff

eren

ce

betw

een

high

pe

rform

ing

and

poor

ly

perfo

rmin

g ar

eas

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

unem

ploy

ed

peop

leSD

Gs

SDG

s

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil

Corp

orat

e St

rate

gy

8.6

By 2

020,

su

bsta

ntia

lly re

duce

the

prop

ortio

n of

you

th n

ot

in e

mpl

oym

ent,

educ

atio

n or

trai

ning

8.6.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f yo

uth

(age

d 15

–24 

year

s) n

ot in

ed

ucat

ion,

em

ploy

men

t or

train

ing

Yout

h un

empl

oym

ent

rate

% o

f 17

- 21

year

old

car

e le

aver

s in

EET

% o

f you

ng

peop

le o

f ac

adem

ic

age

16 to

17

year

s w

ho

are

NEE

T &

dest

inat

ion

unkn

own

prop

ortio

n of

you

ng

peop

le w

ho

have

ex

perie

nce

of

wor

k/ap

pre

ntic

eshi

p by

sc

hool

age

16

.SD

Gs

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil

Corp

orat

e St

rate

gy

SDG

8:

Dec

ent

wor

k an

d Ec

onom

ic

Gro

wth

33

8.7

Take

imm

edia

te a

nd

effe

ctiv

e m

easu

res

to

erad

icat

e fo

rced

la

bour

, end

mod

ern

slav

ery

and

hum

an

traffi

ckin

g an

d se

cure

th

e pr

ohib

ition

and

el

imin

atio

n of

the

wor

st

form

s of

chi

ld la

bour

, in

clud

ing

recr

uitm

ent

and

use

of c

hild

so

ldie

rs, a

nd b

y 20

25

end

child

labo

ur in

all

its

form

s

8.7.

1 Pro

porti

on a

nd

num

ber o

f chi

ldre

n ag

ed 5

–17 

year

s en

gage

d in

chi

ld

labo

ur, b

y se

x an

d ag

e

Num

ber o

f Bris

tol

base

d co

mpa

nies

re

porti

ng o

n m

oder

n sl

aver

ySD

Gs

Tisc

repo

rt

8.8

Prot

ect l

abou

r rig

hts

and

prom

ote

safe

an

d se

cure

wor

king

en

viro

nmen

ts fo

r all

wor

kers

, inc

ludi

ng

mig

rant

wor

kers

, in

parti

cula

r wom

en

mig

rant

s, a

nd th

ose

in

prec

ario

us e

mpl

oym

ent

8.8.

1 Fre

quen

cy

rate

s of

fata

l and

no

n-fa

tal

occu

patio

nal

inju

ries,

by

sex

and

mig

rant

sta

tus

SDG

s8.

9 By

203

0, d

evis

e an

d im

plem

ent p

olic

ies

to p

rom

ote

sust

aina

ble

tour

ism

that

cre

ates

jo

bs a

nd p

rom

otes

lo

cal c

ultu

re a

nd

prod

ucts

8.9.

2 Pr

opor

tion

of

jobs

in s

usta

inab

le

tour

ism

indu

strie

s ou

t of t

otal

tour

ism

jo

bs

8.9.

1 Tou

rism

di

rect

GD

P as

a

prop

ortio

n of

tota

l G

DP

and

in g

row

th

rate

SDG

sSD

Gs

9.1 D

evel

op q

ualit

y,

relia

ble,

sus

tain

able

an

d re

silie

nt

infra

stru

ctur

e, in

clud

ing

regi

onal

and

tra

nsbo

rder

in

frast

ruct

ure,

to

supp

ort e

cono

mic

de

velo

pmen

t and

hu

man

wel

l-bei

ng, w

ith a

fo

cus

on a

fford

able

and

eq

uita

ble

acce

ss fo

r all

9.1.2

Pas

seng

er

and

freig

ht v

olum

es,

by m

ode

of

trans

port

Km o

f hig

h ca

paci

ty p

ublic

tra

nspo

rt sy

stem

pe

r 100

000

po

pula

tion

Km o

f lig

ht

pass

enge

r tra

nspo

rt pu

blic

tra

nspo

rt sy

stem

s pe

r 10

0 00

0 po

pula

tion

SDG

s

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

SDG

8:

Dec

ent

wor

k an

d Ec

onom

ic

Gro

wth

SDG

9:

Indu

stry

, In

nova

tion

and

Infr

astr

uct

ure

34

9.2

Prom

ote

incl

usiv

e an

d su

stai

nabl

e in

dust

rializ

atio

n an

d, b

y 20

30, s

igni

fican

tly ra

ise

indu

stry

’s s

hare

of

empl

oym

ent a

nd g

ross

do

mes

tic p

rodu

ct, i

n lin

e w

ith n

atio

nal

circ

umst

ance

s, a

nd

doub

le it

s sh

are

in le

ast

deve

lope

d co

untri

es

9.2.

1 Man

ufac

turin

g va

lue

adde

d as

a

prop

ortio

n of

GD

P an

d pe

r cap

ita

9.2.

2 M

anuf

actu

ring

empl

oym

ent a

s a

prop

ortio

n of

tota

l em

ploy

men

tSD

Gs

SDG

s

9.4

By 2

030,

upg

rade

in

frast

ruct

ure

and

retro

fit in

dust

ries

to

mak

e th

em s

usta

inab

le,

with

incr

ease

d re

sour

ce-u

se e

ffici

ency

an

d gr

eate

r ado

ptio

n of

cl

ean

and

envi

ronm

enta

lly s

ound

te

chno

logi

es a

nd

indu

stria

l pro

cess

es,

with

all

coun

tries

taki

ng

actio

n in

acc

orda

nce

with

thei

r res

pect

ive

capa

bilit

ies

9.4.

1 CO

2 em

issi

on

per u

nit o

f val

ue

adde

dSD

Gs

9.c

Sign

ifica

ntly

in

crea

se a

cces

s to

in

form

atio

n an

d co

mm

unic

atio

ns

tech

nolo

gy a

nd s

trive

to

prov

ide

univ

ersa

l and

af

ford

able

acc

ess

to th

e In

tern

et in

leas

t de

velo

ped

coun

tries

by

202

0

Num

ber o

f int

erne

t co

nnec

tions

per

10

0 00

0 po

pula

tion

% li

ving

in th

e m

ost

depr

ived

are

as

who

hav

e ac

cess

to

the

inte

rnet

at

hom

e vi

a ho

me

broa

dban

d,

mob

ile p

hone

or

mob

ile b

road

band

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

SDG

9:

Indu

stry

, In

nova

tion

and

Infr

astr

uct

ure

35

10.1

By 2

030,

pr

ogre

ssiv

ely

achi

eve

and

sust

ain

inco

me

grow

th o

f the

bot

tom

40

 per

 cen

t of t

he

popu

latio

n at

a ra

te

high

er th

an th

e na

tiona

l av

erag

eG

ini C

oeffi

cien

t

80/2

0 pe

rcen

tile

ratio

of w

eekl

y ea

rnin

gs (a

big

ger

ratio

mea

ns a

bi

gger

diff

eren

ce

betw

een

perc

entil

es a

nd

thus

mor

e in

equa

lity)

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity In

dexe

s/Br

isto

l City

Co

unci

l Dat

a te

am/O

ne

City

Pla

n Th

eme

Lead

sH

appy

City

10

.2 B

y 20

30, e

mpo

wer

an

d pr

omot

e th

e so

cial

, ec

onom

ic a

nd p

oliti

cal

incl

usio

n of

all,

irr

espe

ctiv

e of

age

, se

x, d

isab

ility

, rac

e,

ethn

icity

, orig

in, r

elig

ion

or e

cono

mic

or o

ther

st

atus

10.2

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of

peop

le li

ving

be

low

50 

per c

ent

of m

edia

n in

com

e,

by s

ex

10.2

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of p

eopl

e liv

ing

belo

w 5

0 pe

r cen

t of

med

ian

inco

me,

by

age

10.2

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of

peop

le li

ving

be

low

50

 per

 cen

t of

med

ian

inco

me,

by

pers

ons

with

di

sabi

litie

s

10.2

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of p

eopl

e liv

ing

belo

w

50 p

er c

ent

of m

edia

n in

com

e, b

y et

hnic

itySD

Gs

SDG

sSD

Gs

SDG

s

10.3

Ens

ure

equa

l op

portu

nity

and

redu

ce

ineq

ualit

ies

of o

utco

me,

in

clud

ing

by e

limin

atin

g di

scrim

inat

ory

law

s,

polic

ies

and

prac

tices

an

d pr

omot

ing

appr

opria

te le

gisl

atio

n,

polic

ies

and

actio

n in

th

is re

gard

10.3

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of

popu

latio

n re

porti

ng h

avin

g pe

rson

ally

felt

disc

rimin

ated

ag

ains

t or h

aras

sed

in th

e pr

evio

us 12

m

onth

s on

the

basi

s of

a g

roun

d of

di

scrim

inat

ion

proh

ibite

d un

der

inte

rnat

iona

l hum

an

right

s la

wRa

ce p

ay g

apG

ende

r pay

ga

p SD

Gs

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil

Busi

ness

st

rate

gy

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil

Busi

ness

st

rate

gy10

.4 A

dopt

pol

icie

s,

espe

cial

ly fi

scal

, wag

e an

d so

cial

pro

tect

ion

polic

ies,

and

pr

ogre

ssiv

ely

achi

eve

grea

ter e

qual

ity

% o

f ful

l-tim

e em

ploy

ees

with

low

re

lativ

e in

com

e (le

ss th

an 7

0% o

f UK

med

ian

wag

e)H

appy

City

SDG

10:

Redu

ced

Ineq

ualit

ies

36

11.1

By 2

030,

ens

ure

acce

ss fo

r all

to

adeq

uate

, saf

e an

d af

ford

able

hou

sing

and

ba

sic

serv

ices

and

up

grad

e sl

ums

11.1.

1 Pro

porti

on o

f ur

ban

popu

latio

n liv

ing

in s

lum

s,

info

rmal

set

tlem

ents

or

inad

equa

te

hous

ing

Soci

al a

nd p

rivat

e ho

usin

g in

poo

r co

nditi

on

(pro

porti

on)

Num

ber (

per

100

hous

ehol

ds)

acce

pted

as

bein

g ho

mel

ess

and

in p

riorit

y ne

ed u

nder

th

e ho

mel

essn

ess

prov

isio

ns o

f th

e 19

96

Hou

sing

Act

Ove

rall

satis

fact

ion

with

you

r cu

rren

t ac

com

mod

atio

n - b

y te

nure

SD

Gs

Hap

py C

ityH

appy

City

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

11.2

By

2030

, pro

vide

ac

cess

to s

afe,

af

ford

able

, acc

essi

ble

and

sust

aina

ble

trans

port

syst

ems

for

all,

impr

ovin

g ro

ad

safe

ty, n

otab

ly b

y ex

pand

ing

publ

ic

trans

port,

with

spe

cial

at

tent

ion

to th

e ne

eds

of

thos

e in

vul

nera

ble

situ

atio

ns, w

omen

, ch

ildre

n, p

erso

ns w

ith

disa

bilit

ies

and

olde

r pe

rson

s

11.2

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of

popu

latio

n th

at h

as

conv

enie

nt a

cces

s to

pub

lic tr

ansp

ort,

by s

ex, a

ge a

nd

pers

ons

with

di

sabi

litie

s

Mod

al s

plit,

focu

s on

sus

tain

able

and

ac

tive

trans

port

Km o

f lig

ht

pass

enge

r tra

nspo

rt pu

blic

tra

nspo

rt sy

stem

s pe

r 10

0 00

0 po

pula

tion

Annu

al

num

ber o

f pu

blic

tra

nspo

rt tri

ps p

er

capi

taSD

Gs

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

11.3

By

2030

, enh

ance

in

clus

ive

and

sust

aina

ble

urba

niza

tion

and

capa

city

for

parti

cipa

tory

, int

egra

ted

and

sust

aina

ble

hum

an

settl

emen

t pla

nnin

g an

d m

anag

emen

t in

all

coun

tries

11.3

.1 Ra

tio o

f lan

d co

nsum

ptio

n ra

te to

po

pula

tion

grow

th

rate

Vote

r par

ticip

atio

n in

last

mun

icip

al

elec

tion

(as

% o

f el

igib

le v

oter

s)

Wom

en a

s a

%

of to

tal

elec

ted

to c

ity-

leve

l offi

ceSD

Gs

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

SDG

11:

Sust

aina

ble

Citie

s an

d Co

mm

unit

ies

37

11.4

Stre

ngth

en e

fforts

to

pro

tect

and

sa

fegu

ard

the

wor

ld’s

cu

ltura

l and

nat

ural

he

ritag

e

11.4

.1 To

tal

expe

nditu

re (p

ublic

an

d pr

ivat

e) p

er

capi

ta s

pent

on

the

pres

erva

tion,

pr

otec

tion

and

cons

erva

tion

of a

ll cu

ltura

l and

nat

ural

he

ritag

e, b

y ty

pe o

f he

ritag

e (c

ultu

ral,

natu

ral,

mix

ed a

nd

Wor

ld H

erita

ge

Cent

re d

esig

natio

n),

leve

l of g

over

nmen

t (n

atio

nal,

regi

onal

an

d lo

cal/m

unic

ipal

), ty

pe o

f exp

endi

ture

(o

pera

ting

expe

nditu

re/in

vest

men

t) an

d ty

pe o

f pr

ivat

e fu

ndin

g (d

onat

ions

in k

ind,

pr

ivat

e no

n-pr

ofit

sect

or a

nd

spon

sors

hip)

Num

ber o

f tou

rists

vi

sitin

g Br

isto

l SD

Gs

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

11.5

By

2030

, si

gnifi

cant

ly re

duce

the

num

ber o

f dea

ths

and

the

num

ber o

f peo

ple

affe

cted

and

su

bsta

ntia

lly d

ecre

ase

the

dire

ct e

cono

mic

lo

sses

rela

tive

to

glob

al g

ross

dom

estic

pr

oduc

t cau

sed

by

disa

ster

s, in

clud

ing

wat

er-re

late

d di

sast

ers,

w

ith a

focu

s on

pr

otec

ting

the

poor

and

pe

ople

in v

ulne

rabl

e si

tuat

ions

11.5

.2 D

irect

ec

onom

ic lo

ss in

re

latio

n to

glo

bal

GD

P, d

amag

e to

cr

itica

l inf

rast

ruct

ure

and

num

ber o

f di

srup

tions

to b

asic

se

rvic

es, a

ttrib

uted

to

dis

aste

rs

Num

ber o

f di

sast

er re

late

d de

aths

per

100

000

popu

latio

nSD

Gs

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

SDG

11:

Sust

aina

ble

Citie

s an

d Co

mm

unit

ies

38

11.6

By

2030

, red

uce

the

adve

rse

per c

apita

en

viro

nmen

tal i

mpa

ct o

f ci

ties,

incl

udin

g by

pa

ying

spe

cial

atte

ntio

n to

air

qual

ity a

nd

mun

icip

al a

nd o

ther

w

aste

man

agem

ent

11.6

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of

urba

n so

lid w

aste

re

gula

rly c

olle

cted

an

d w

ith a

dequ

ate

final

dis

char

ge o

ut

of to

tal u

rban

sol

id

was

te g

ener

ated

, by

citi

es

11.6

.2 A

nnua

l mea

n le

vels

of f

ine

parti

cula

te m

atte

r (e

.g. P

M2.

5 an

d PM

10) i

n ci

ties

(pop

ulat

ion

wei

ghte

d)

Nitr

ogen

D

ioxi

de (N

O2)

co

ncen

tratio

n

Sulp

hur

Dio

xide

(S

O2)

co

ncen

tratio

n

Ozo

ne (O

3)

conc

entra

tion

SDG

sSD

Gs

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

11.7

By

2030

, pro

vide

un

iver

sal a

cces

s to

sa

fe, i

nclu

sive

and

ac

cess

ible

, gre

en a

nd

publ

ic s

pace

s, in

pa

rticu

lar f

or w

omen

an

d ch

ildre

n, o

lder

pe

rson

s an

d pe

rson

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s

% o

f res

iden

ts

visi

ting

a pa

rk o

r op

en s

pace

at l

east

on

ce a

wee

k

Gre

en a

rea

(hec

tare

s) p

er 10

0 00

0 po

pula

tion

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

inde

xes

12.2

By

2030

, ach

ieve

th

e su

stai

nabl

e m

anag

emen

t and

ef

ficie

nt u

se o

f nat

ural

re

sour

ces

12.2

.1 M

ater

ial

foot

prin

t, m

ater

ial

foot

prin

t per

cap

ita,

and

mat

eria

l fo

otpr

int p

er G

DP

12.2

.2 D

omes

tic

mat

eria

l co

nsum

ptio

n,

dom

estic

mat

eria

l co

nsum

ptio

n pe

r ca

pita

, and

do

mes

tic m

ater

ial

cons

umpt

ion

per

GD

PSD

Gs

SDG

s12

.3 B

y 20

30, h

alve

per

ca

pita

glo

bal f

ood

was

te a

t the

reta

il an

d co

nsum

er le

vels

and

re

duce

food

loss

es

alon

g pr

oduc

tion

and

supp

ly c

hain

s, in

clud

ing

post

-har

vest

loss

esFo

od w

aste

per

ca

pita

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

SDG

11:

Sust

aina

ble

Citie

s an

d Co

mm

unit

ies

SDG

12:

Resp

onsi

ble

Pr

oduc

tion

and

Cons

umpt

ion

39

12.4

By

2020

, ach

ieve

th

e en

viro

nmen

tally

so

und

man

agem

ent o

f ch

emic

als

and

all

was

tes

thro

ugho

ut th

eir

life

cycl

e, in

acc

orda

nce

with

agr

eed

inte

rnat

iona

l fra

mew

orks

, and

si

gnifi

cant

ly re

duce

th

eir r

elea

se to

air,

w

ater

and

soi

l in

orde

r to

min

imiz

e th

eir

adve

rse

impa

cts

on

hum

an h

ealth

and

the

envi

ronm

ent

12.4

.2 H

azar

dous

w

aste

gen

erat

ed

per c

apita

and

pr

opor

tion

of

haza

rdou

s w

aste

tre

ated

, by

type

of

treat

men

tSD

Gs

12.5

By

2030

, su

bsta

ntia

lly re

duce

w

aste

gen

erat

ion

thro

ugh

prev

entio

n,

redu

ctio

n, re

cycl

ing

and

reus

eRe

cycl

ing

rate

sTo

tal w

aste

pr

oduc

ed

Tota

l was

te

reus

ed

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

12.6

Enc

oura

ge

com

pani

es, e

spec

ially

la

rge

and

trans

natio

nal

com

pani

es, t

o ad

opt

sust

aina

ble

prac

tices

an

d to

inte

grat

e su

stai

nabi

lity

info

rmat

ion

into

thei

r rep

ortin

g cy

cle

Num

ber o

f co

mpa

nies

ad

optin

g O

CP/S

DG

s

12.6

.1 N

umbe

r of

com

pani

es

publ

ishi

ng

sust

aina

bilit

y re

ports

Tisc

repo

rtSD

Gs

12.7

Pro

mot

e pu

blic

pr

ocur

emen

t pra

ctic

es

that

are

sus

tain

able

, in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith

natio

nal p

olic

ies

and

prio

ritie

sIm

plem

enta

tion

fo

Soci

al V

alue

Por

tal

SVP

SDG

12:

Resp

onsi

ble

Pr

oduc

tion

and

Cons

umpt

ion

40

12.8

By

2030

, ens

ure

that

peo

ple

ever

ywhe

re h

ave

the

rele

vant

info

rmat

ion

and

awar

enes

s fo

r su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t and

lif

esty

les

in h

arm

ony

with

nat

ure

4.7.

1 Ext

ent t

o w

hich

(i)

glo

bal c

itize

nshi

p ed

ucat

ion

and

(ii)

educ

atio

n fo

r su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t, in

clud

ing

gend

er

equa

lity

and

hum

an

right

s, a

re

mai

nstre

amed

at a

ll le

vels

in (a

) nat

iona

l ed

ucat

ion

polic

ies;

(b

) cur

ricul

a;

(c) t

each

er

educ

atio

n; a

nd (d

) st

uden

t ass

essm

ent

SDG

s

13.1

Stre

ngth

en

resi

lienc

e an

d ad

aptiv

e ca

paci

ty to

clim

ate-

rela

ted

haza

rds

and

natu

ral d

isas

ters

in a

ll co

untri

es

13.1.

1 Num

ber o

f de

aths

, mis

sing

pe

rson

s an

d di

rect

ly a

ffect

ed

pers

ons

attri

bute

d to

dis

aste

rs p

er

100,

000

popu

latio

nSD

Gs

13.2

Inte

grat

e cl

imat

e ch

ange

mea

sure

s in

to

(nat

iona

l) po

licie

s,

stra

tegi

es a

nd p

lann

ing

Hav

e ne

w c

limat

e ch

ange

pol

icie

s or

in

itiat

ives

bee

n in

trodu

ced

by c

ity

stak

ehol

ders

?Al

tern

ativ

e In

dica

tor

SDG

13:

Clim

ate

Actio

n

SDG

12:

Resp

onsi

ble

Pr

oduc

tion

and

Cons

umpt

ion

41

13.3

Impr

ove

educ

atio

n,

awar

enes

s-ra

isin

g an

d hu

man

and

inst

itutio

nal

capa

city

on

clim

ate

chan

ge m

itiga

tion,

ad

apta

tion,

impa

ct

redu

ctio

n an

d ea

rly

war

ning

4.7.

1 Ext

ent t

o w

hich

(i)

glo

bal c

itize

nshi

p ed

ucat

ion

and

(ii)

educ

atio

n fo

r su

stai

nabl

e de

velo

pmen

t, in

clud

ing

gend

er

equa

lity

and

hum

an

right

s, a

re

mai

nstre

amed

at a

ll le

vels

in (a

) nat

iona

l ed

ucat

ion

polic

ies;

(b

) cur

ricul

a;

(c) t

each

er

educ

atio

n; a

nd (d

) st

uden

t ass

essm

ent

SDG

sSD

G 14

: Li

fe U

nder

W

ater

14.1

By 2

025,

pre

vent

an

d si

gnifi

cant

ly re

duce

m

arin

e po

llutio

n of

all

kind

s, in

par

ticul

ar fr

om

land

-bas

ed a

ctiv

ities

, in

clud

ing

mar

ine

debr

is

and

nutri

ent p

ollu

tion

14.1.

1 Ind

ex o

f co

asta

l eu

troph

icat

ion

and

float

ing

plas

tic

debr

is d

ensi

ty

Ecol

ogic

al s

tatu

s of

Bris

tol’s

wat

er

catc

hmen

tSD

Gs

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

15.1

By 2

020,

ens

ure

the

cons

erva

tion,

re

stor

atio

n an

d su

stai

nabl

e us

e of

te

rres

trial

and

inla

nd

fresh

wat

er e

cosy

stem

s an

d th

eir s

ervi

ces,

in

parti

cula

r for

ests

, w

etla

nds,

mou

ntai

ns a

nd

dryl

ands

, in

line

with

ob

ligat

ions

und

er

inte

rnat

iona

l ag

reem

ents

Ecol

ogic

al s

tatu

s of

Br

isto

l’s w

ater

ca

tchm

ent

Tree

can

opy

cove

r in

Bris

tol

Gre

en a

rea

(hec

tare

s) p

er

100

000

popu

latio

n

Net

bi

odiv

ersi

ty

incr

ease

One

City

Pl

an T

hem

e Le

ads

Bris

tol C

ity

Coun

cil D

ata

Team

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

Hap

py C

ity

15.9

By

2020

, int

egra

te

ecos

yste

m a

nd

biod

iver

sity

val

ues

into

na

tiona

l and

loca

l pl

anni

ng, d

evel

opm

ent

proc

esse

s, p

over

ty

redu

ctio

n st

rate

gies

an

d ac

coun

ts

Hav

e ne

w

ecos

yste

m a

nd

biod

iver

sity

val

ues

been

inte

grat

ed

into

pla

nnin

g pr

oces

ses

or

deve

lopm

ent

initi

ativ

es in

Bris

tol?

Alte

rnat

ive

Indi

cato

r

SDG

13:

Clim

ate

Actio

n

SDG

15:

Life

on

Land

42

16.1

Sign

ifica

ntly

redu

ce

all f

orm

s of

vio

lenc

e an

d re

late

d de

ath

rate

s ev

eryw

here

16.1.

4 Pr

opor

tion

of

popu

latio

n th

at fe

el

safe

wal

king

alo

ne

arou

nd th

e ar

ea

they

live

16.1.

3 Pr

opor

tion

of p

opul

atio

n su

bjec

ted

to

phys

ical

, ps

ycho

logi

cal o

r se

xual

vio

lenc

e in

th

e pr

evio

us

12 m

onth

sSD

Gs

SDG

s

16.2

End

abu

se,

expl

oita

tion,

traf

ficki

ng

and

all f

orm

s of

vi

olen

ce a

gain

st a

nd

tortu

re o

f chi

ldre

n

16.2

.1 Pr

opor

tion

of

child

ren

aged

1–

17 y

ears

who

ex

perie

nced

any

ph

ysic

al p

unis

hmen

t an

d/or

ps

ycho

logi

cal

aggr

essi

on b

y ca

regi

vers

in th

e pa

st m

onth

16.2

.2 N

umbe

r of

vict

ims

of h

uman

tra

ffick

ing

per

100,

000

popu

latio

n, b

y se

x, a

ge a

nd fo

rm

of e

xplo

itatio

n

16.2

.3

Prop

ortio

n of

yo

ung

wom

en

and

men

age

d 18

–29 

year

s w

ho

expe

rienc

ed

sexu

al

viol

ence

by

age 

18SD

Gs

SDG

sSD

Gs

16.4

By

2030

, si

gnifi

cant

ly re

duce

ill

icit

finan

cial

and

arm

s flo

ws,

stre

ngth

en th

e re

cove

ry a

nd re

turn

of

stol

en a

sset

s an

d co

mba

t all

form

s of

or

gani

zed

crim

eCr

ime

rate

Viol

ent C

rime

Rate

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

City

Su

stai

nabi

lity

Inde

xes

16.6

Dev

elop

effe

ctiv

e,

acco

unta

ble

and

trans

pare

nt in

stitu

tions

at

all

leve

ls

16.6

.2 P

ropo

rtion

of

popu

latio

n sa

tisfie

d w

ith th

eir l

ast

expe

rienc

e of

pu

blic

ser

vice

sSD

Gs

16.7

Ens

ure

resp

onsi

ve,

incl

usiv

e, p

artic

ipat

ory

and

repr

esen

tativ

e de

cisi

on-m

akin

g at

all

leve

ls

16.7

.1 Pr

opor

tions

of

pos

ition

s (b

y se

x,

age,

per

sons

with

di

sabi

litie

s an

d po

pula

tion

grou

ps)

in p

ublic

inst

itutio

ns

(nat

iona

l and

loca

l le

gisl

atur

es, p

ublic

se

rvic

e, a

nd

judi

ciar

y) c

ompa

red

to n

atio

nal

dist

ribut

ions

16.7

.2 P

ropo

rtion

of

pop

ulat

ion

who

be

lieve

dec

isio

n-m

akin

g is

incl

usiv

e an

d re

spon

sive

, by

sex

, age

, di

sabi

lity

and

popu

latio

n gr

oup

SDG

sSD

Gs

SDG

16:

Peac

e Ju

stic

e an

d St

rong

In

stitu

tion

s

SDG

17:

Part

ners

hips

for t

he

Goa

ls

17.17

Enc

oura

ge a

nd

prom

ote

effe

ctiv

e pu

blic

, pub

lic-p

rivat

e an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty

partn

ersh

ips,

bui

ldin

g on

the

expe

rienc

e an

d re

sour

cing

stra

tegi

es o

f pa

rtner

ship

s

Hav

e ne

w p

ublic

, pu

blic

-priv

ate

and

civi

l soc

iety

pa

rtner

ship

s fo

rmed

in B

risto

l to

enha

nce

capa

city

to

achi

eve

loca

l su

stai

nabi

lity

goal

s?Al

tern

ativ

e In

dica

tor

43

ENDNOTES1. Bristol City Council. 2019. “State of Bristol: Key Facts 2018-19.”

https://www.bristol.gov.uk/documents/20182/32947/State+of+Bris-

tol+-+Key+Facts+2018-19.PDF/263d5f0f-763e-9553-467d-c9704f307d7c.

2. BBC News. 2017. “Bristol Named Best Place to Live in Britain in 2017.”

March 19, 2017. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-39320118.

3. Earl, Grace. 2017. “Bristol is now officially Europe’s coolest city and in the

Top 20 in the world.” The Bristol Post. December 5, 2017. https://www.bris-

tolpost.co.uk/whats-on/whats-on-news/bristol-coolest-city-in-world-878497.

4. Bristol City Council, 2018.

5. Bristol City Office. 2019. “One City Plan.” Bristol. https://www.bristolonec-

ity.com/one-city-plan.

6. Greene, Solomon and Brady Meixell. 2017. “Hacking the Sustainable

Development Goals: Can US Cities Measure Up?” http://www.urban.org/

sites/default/files/publication/92946/hacking-the-sustainable-develop-

ment-goals_0.pdf.

7. Ahvenniemi, Hannele, Aapo Huovila, Isabel Pinto-Seppä, and Miimu

Airaksinen. 2017. “What Are the Differences between Sustainable and

Smart Cities?” Cities 60 (February): 234–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cit-

ies.2016.09.009.

44

8. Macleod, Allan and Ian Townsend. 2018. “Bristol Method+: Driving the

Sustainable Development Goals Agenda at the city level in Bristol.” Bristol

Green Capital Partnership. https://bristolgreencapital.org/wp-content/

uploads/2018/07/Bristol-Method_Driving-the-SDGs-agenda-at-city-level-in-

Bristol_17-Jul-2018.pdf.

9. See “Hacking the Sustainable Development Goals: Can US Cities Mea-

sure Up?” (2017).

10. See “Bristol Method+: Driving the Sustainable Development Goals

Agenda at the city level in Bristol.” (2018).

11. See “Hacking the Sustainable Development Goals: Can US Cities Mea-

sure Up?” (2017).

12. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. n.d. “SDG Indicators.”

https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list.

13. McCarney, Patricia, James Patava, Birgitte Hansen, Matthew Lynch,

Sahifa Imran, and Nicholas Bakewell. 2017. “WCCD City Data for the United

Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2017.” Toronto: World Council on

City Data (WCCD). https://www.dataforcities.org/publications.

14. United for Smart Sustainable Cities. 2018. “United for Smart Sustainable

Cities: United Smart Cities Index.” https://www.itu.int/en/publications/Docu-

ments/tsb/2017-U4SSC-Collection-Methodology/mobile/index.html.

15. IESE Business School – University of Navarra. 2017. “IESE Cities in

Motion Index.” https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/ST-0442-E.pdf.

45

16. Espey, Jessica, Hayden Dahmm, Laurie Manderino, John Biberman,

Yingxin Ye, Gary Verburg, and Juan Puyana. 2018. “Leaving No U.S. City

Behind: The U.S. Cities Sustainable Development Goals Index 2018.” http://

unsdsn.org/resources/publications/leaving-no-u-s-city-behind-the-2018-u-s-

cities-sdgs-index.

17. Arcadis. 2016. “Sustainable Cities Index 2016.” https://www.arcadis.com/

media/0/6/6/%7B06687980-3179-47AD-89FD-F6AFA76EBB73%7DSustain-

able%20Cities%20Index%202016%20Global%20Web.pdf.

18. Sustainable Cities International. 2012. “Indicators for Sustainability:

How Cities Are Monitoring and Evaluating Their Success.” https://sustain-

ablecities.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/indicators-for-sustainability-in-

tl-case-studies-final.pdf.

19. UN-Habitat. 2016. “The Global Goals for Sustainable Development

and City Prosperity Initiative.” http://cpi.unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/

resources/CPI%20and%20SDGs.pdf.

20. Ambiente Italia. 2007. “Urban Ecosystem Europe: An Integrated

Assessment on the Sustainability of 32 European Cities.” http://www.dexia.

com/EN/journalist/press_releases/Documents/20080201_urban_ecosys-

tem_UK.pdf.