12
Aortic Symposium 2012 Short Term Outcomes in Endovascular and Open Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms Are Controversial Through NSQIP Alexander I. Kraev, MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Alexander I. Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

  • Upload
    elvin

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Short Term Outcomes in Endovascular and Open Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms Are Controversial Through NSQIP. Alexander I. Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

Short Term Outcomes in Endovascular and Open Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Are Controversial Through NSQIP

Alexander I. Kraev, MDAndrew Nguyen, MD

R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhDGregg Landis, MD

Page 2: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)

• Administered by the American College of Surgeons– Join Commission Surgical Care Improvement Project

• 400 Centers participating across United States– Teaching and non-teaching hospitals

• 136 Perioperative variables measured– Preoperative risk factors– Intraoperative variables– 30-day post-op morbidity and mortality outcomes

Page 3: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

TEVAR

• Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair– Minimally invasive option to the traditional

open repair• Initial experience at specialty institutions

– Highly favorable towards TEVAR• Currently widely adopted across the

country– Prospective and long-term studies are lacking

Page 4: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

NSQIP 2005-2009 Database

• 12162 total aortic cases– 7374 endovascular repairs– 4788 open repairs

Elective Emergency Total

Open Repair 102 16 118TEVAR 635 128 763Total 737 144 881

Page 5: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

NSQIP Database

Page 6: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

Descriptive Statistics

TEVAR Open P-valueAge (years) 68.5 67.6 .54Male % 59.7 62.7 .55Op Time (min) 170.2 233.8 <.0001Anesth Time (min) 272.2 338.2 <.0001Return to OR (yes %) 12.3% 13.6% .66ASA III/IV (%) 94.6 90.7 .58Emergency (%) 16.7 13.6 .38LOS (days) 7.4 10.8 <.001

Page 7: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

TEVAR vs Open Mortality

Page 8: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

TEVAR vs Open: Cardiac Outcomes

• Combined end-point of cardiac arrest or acute myocardial infarction

Page 9: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

TEVAR vs Open: Pulmonary Outcomes

• Combined end-point of prolonged intubation, re-intubation, pulmonary embolism, or pneumonia

Page 10: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

TEVAR vs Open: Renal Outcomes

• Combined end-point of acute renal insufficiency or acute renal failure

Page 11: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

TEVAR vs Open: Post-Operative Stroke

Page 12: Alexander I.  Kraev , MD Andrew Nguyen, MD R Anthony Perez-Tamayo, MD PhD Gregg Landis, MD

Aortic Symposium 2012

Conclusion

• Short term mortality of TEVAR and open repair are equivalent

• Operative time, anesthesia time, and length of stay are shorter in TEVAR

• Pulmonary and renal outcomes are superior in TEVAR

• Stroke rate is higher in TEVAR