202
SURVEY REPORT NORTHWEST ALASKA ECONOMIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROSPECTS by Walter Parker Dale Swanson Victor Fischer Jennifer Christian prepared for United States Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District March 1972 Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research University of Alaska Fairbankst Alaska

ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

SURVEY REPORT

NORTHWEST ALASKA ECONOMIC AND TRANSPORTATION PROSPECTS

by

Walter Parker Dale Swanson

Victor Fischer Jennifer Christian

prepared for

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District

March 1972

Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research

University of Alaska

Fairbankst Alaska

Page 2: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

CHAPTER I - THE REGION

Physical Features Seward Peninsula Kobuk Valley North Slope

Population Growth and Distribution Age and Sex Composition Educational Attainment

Economy Sources of Food Sources of Cash Income Employment and Unemployment

Footnotes

CHAPTER II - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: PRESENT AND POTENTIAL

Minerals and Mining Seward Peninsula Kobuk Valley North Slope

Oil and Gas Development of Prudhoe Bay Field Exploring North Slope Province

Onshore Material Requirements Offshore

Development of National Petroleum Reserve Number Four

Gas Line Developments

v

vii

viii

xi

1

2 2 5 6

10 10 16 19

22 22 25 27

32

33

34 35 41 43

1, 7 50 51 51 53 54

55 58

Page 3: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

Fisheries and Aquatic Animals Norton Sound Kotzebue Sound and Its' ASsociated

60 62

River Systems 64 Northwest and Arctic Coasts 64

Reindeer Husbandry 6 7

Tourism and Recreation 73 Nome 74 Kotzebue 75 Barrow 76 Prudhoe Bay 77

Footnotes 78

CHAPTER III - SPECIAL FACTORS IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 82

Changes in Land Ownership 83 Seward Peninsula 86 Kobuk Valley 88 North Slope 89

Alaska Native Fund Payments 91

Form of Government 93 Local Government 94 RurALCAP 96 Prospects for Regional Government 98

Footnotes 100

CHAPTER IV - TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN NORTHWEST ALASKA 101

Transportation Systems 102

Shipment Routes 102

Waterborne Transportation 106 Interregional Freight 107 Northwest Region Ports 114 Intraregional Freight 118

Page 4: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

Airborne Transportation 118 Freight Shipment J;1y,t{;1i1 121 North Slope Air Cargo 122

Road Network 124

Footnotes 125

CHAPTER V - FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR WATERBORNE TRANSPORTATION 127

Forecasting 128

Prospects Until 1980-85 128 Cargo Load Levels 12 9 Port and Other Transport Improvements 131

After the 1980's 138

Footnotes 144

APPENDIX A - FREIGHT TRAFFIC 145

APPENDIX B - FREIGHT SENT VIA PARCEL POST 152

APPENDIX C - ICE CONDITIONS, WEST COAST OF ALASKA 164

BIBLIOGRAPHY 176

Page 5: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Table

I-1 I-2 I-3 I-4

I-5 I-6

I-7

I-8

I-9 I-10 I-11

I-12

I-13

Il-14

II-15 II:-16

II-17 Il-18

III-19

III-20

III-21

IV-22

IV-23

IV-24

v

LIST OF TABLES

Subject Page

Average Temperature and Precipitation, Nome, Alaska 5 Major Rivers of Northwest Alaska 7 Average Temperature and Precipitation, Barrow, Alaska 9 Alaska's Population, Population Increase, Percent 11

Increase, and Present Distribution by Region, 1740-1970

Alaska's Population by Race and Region, 1960 and 1970 13 Urbanization Process in Northwest Alaska, Reflected in 14

Percentage Increase of the Population Living in the Regional Centers of Barrow, Kotzebue, and Nome, 1939-1970

Northwest Alaska, Total Population by Race and Census 17 Districts, 1939-1970

Total Population of Northwest Alaska by Census Divisions 18 and Places: 1970

Northwest Alaska, Population by Age and Sex 19 'Northwest Alaska, Educational Attainment, Ages 16-65 20 Summary of Social Characteristics by Census Divisions: 21

1970 Dependence Upon Food Gathering for Subsistence in 35 23

Northern Coastal and Interior Villages (1968) Summary of Economic Characteristics by Census 29

Divisions: 1970

Potential One-Time Inbound Cargo Flows to Support 61 Onshore Oil and Gas Development in Northwest Alaska

Fisheries Production and Potential, Norton Sound Area 63 Dollar Value Estimates of Kotzebue District Commercial 65

Fishery, 1962-1968 Individual Reindeer Herd Operations, 1948-68 69 Reindeer Meat Production for All Alaska 70

Native, State, and Federal Lands, Existing and 84 Planned for Acquisition in Northwest Alaska

Preliminary Estimate of Income to Northwest Region 92 from Native Claims Settlement

Number of Communities in Northwest Alaska, Qualified 95 and Incorporated as Cities

Comparison of Ligh terage and Ocean Freight Rates in Selected Ports of the Northwest Region, 1965

Relationship between Freight Charges and Price Levels -1965, Seattle to Nome

A Summary of Freight lloved Interregion Between 1965 and 1970 by Water

108

111

113

Page 6: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Table

IV-25

IV-26

V-27

V-28

A-1 A-2

A-3

B-1

B-2

vi

LIST OF TABLES (continued)

Subject

Airport Activity Statistics of Certified Route Air Carriers

Air Freight Carried into Northwest Region by Major Airlines, 1967-70

Projections for Waterborne Commerce for Northwestern Alaska until 1980-85

Projections for Waterborne Commerce for Northwestern Alaska, 1985-2000

Freight Traffic, Nome Harbor Bering Sea Port, Nunivak Island to Demarcation Point,

Freight Traffic Freight Traffic, Yukon River

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Fairbanks Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Office for Air Transport Onward

120

122

132

142

146 149

151

153

157

Page 7: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

r--- Figure ' I I

I 1-1

1-2

I II-3

I II-4

III-5

IV-6

IV-7

IV-8

V-9

vii

LIST OF FIGURES

~t1bject

Northwest Alaska, Regions, Major Population Centers and Major Rivers

Population of Alaska by Regions, 1740-1970

Locator Map for Potential and Existing Mining and Oil Development in Northwest Alaska

Estimated Number of Reindeer by Years, Alaska, 1892 to 1965

Lands Tentatively Approved for Patent to State of of Alaska and State-Selected Lands and Lands Eligible for Selection by Natives (March 28, 1972)

Existing Marine and Air Transportation Routes of Northwest Alaska

Existing and Proposed Rail and Road Routes of Northwest Alaska

Northwest Alaska Ports - Petroleum Products as a Portion of Total Cargo

Proposed Water/Land Transportation Network - Baldwin Peninsula, Near Kotzebue

3

12

46

68

85

103

104

115

135

Page 8: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

ACKNOWLEDGEl!ENTS

Page 9: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

ix

The extra measure of coopcratJon we rece:lve<l from federal agencles,

transportation carriers, and other fi nns merits special men ti on. This

study deals with a subject for which only scarce and inadequate sta-

tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain

individuals who could help us piece together the facts. Important

insights, critical information and useful advice came to us from the

following persons: A. Lee Atherton of Seattle First National Bank,

V.R. Crabb of Alaska Steamship Lines, Leo Collar of Puget Sound Tug

and Barge, Al Doyle of Federal Aviation Administration in Nome, Roy

Isackson of Interior Airways, J.E. Kirkpatrick of Foss Launch and Tug,

Robert McLean of the Bureau of Indian Affairs in Seattle, William D.

McLean of Puget Sound Tug and Barge, Tom Osdale of Northland Marine,

Leroy Peterson of Alaska Airlines, Richard Reeve of Reeve Aleutian

Airways, Wyman Rice of Wien Consolidated, the Staff of the Alaska Trans-

portation Commission, and Pearse Walsh of Pacific Canadian Explorations.

We also appreciated the working relationship we have had with the

Corps of Engineers both in Anchorage and Seattle. In particular, our

thanks go to Mr. Charles Welling, Chief of the Economics Section, who

provided constructive guidance throughout the study, expedited provision

of needed information, and carried out a most helpful critical review

of an earlier draft of this study. 't

The study was performed under the general direction of Victor Fischer,

Director of the Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research.

Most of the report is the work of Walter Parker, transportation planner

and research associate of ISEGR. Dr. Dale Swanson, associate professor

and head of the Department of Business Administration of the University

Page 10: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

x

of Alaska, assembled and analyzed information on the transportation

aspects of the study. ·The final report owes its readability to the

rewriting and reorganizing talents of Jennifer Christian. Joyce

Bonavieh··eompetently~handled ... the .eleventh:-.hol!L preP.''Xi'o~i2'1 .. oL.th<c ....

manuscript.

Page 11: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Page 12: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

xii

This review of Northwest Alaska economic development potentials

and transportation was designed to assist the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers in evaluation of harbor requirements for Northwest Alaska.

The study focuses on economic activity and freight movements, both

past and present, and upon projections of future developments, both

short- and long-term. The report neither discusses nor analyzes

feasibility of individual projects.

Previous work on Northwest Alaska includes a survey report issued

in 1957 by the U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska. That study reviewed

the economy of the region and analyzed special problem areas within the

province of the Corps of Engineers. Consideration was given to a series

of possible projects for the region, including a deep sea terminal.

However, the District Engineer concluded that no economic justification

existed at that time for construction of any project considered in the

report.

Conditions in Northwest Alaska changed substantially in the period

since 1957 and a new look at the region's current and potential economic

activity was called for. Most significantly, the major petroleum dis­

covery at Prudhoe Bay now provides the potential for long-term develop­

ment of the Northwest. Despite the current slowdown, additional explora­

tion and discoveries can be anticipated. Even if the oil moves by pipe­

line, petroleum industry activity in the Northwest Region will require

freight shipments of a magnitude best moved by water.

Other factors in the Northwest's economic picture have changed

since 1957. What remained of gold mining has largely given way to

intensive exploration for other mineral prospects; several significant

Page 13: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

xiii

discoveries have been made. Government activities in the region have

increased substantially since statehood. The federal government has

shown increasing interest in the welfare of Alaska Natives, and various

social and economic efforts have ·be-err ±nitrated with the assistance of

the Economic Development Administration,· Office of Economic Opportunity,

and several other agencies. Since 1957 also, Natives have formed asso­

ciations and initiated action to win control over land and receive ade­

quate compensation for the extinguishment of aboriginal land rights.

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will have important economic

effects in all parts of Alaska. Since 1957, changes have also occurred

in the reindeer industry, tourism and other segments of the economy.

These developments, together with a newly awakened national interest

in Alaska's North, make this review of medium- and long-range develop­

ment potentials most opportune.

Long-range plans must by definition look far into the future,

beyond the realm of the "probable" into the "maybe." In recognition

of the fact that long-range planners must prepare for every contingency,

the chapter on long-range possibilities reflects the range of levels

of development, from maximum to minimum. Even though definitive data

do not exist for all areas that need to be analyzed, an overall review

of development prospects based on currently available knowledge and

forecasts can provide the basis for further planning by the Corps of

Engineers.

In concluding this study, the investigators point to the mining

operations at Lost River on the Seward Peninsula as the most probable

source of continuing large-scale marine cargo shipments. Once oil

and gas exploration resumes, the existing transportation system will

Page 14: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

xiv

be strained for a few years in order to meet the oil industry's cargo

needs. When the production phase begins, the oil industry will require

cargo deliveries on the order of only 10,000 tons a year. Fisheries,

tourism, and reindeer husbandry all have prospects for economic growth,

but none of these is likely to revolutionize the marine cargo transporta-

tion picture in the Northwest. Likewise, changes in land ownership and

payments to Natives under the Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 will

have effects throughout the region, but probably will not by themselves

cause a large increase in the demand for cargo ~hipments to the North-

west. Other than mineral development, it is unlikely that the Northwest

will generate enough commercial or industrial activity by the end of

this century to significantly expand its freight traffic. Provision

of good port facilities alone would not alter that fact.

On the other hand, the inhabitants of the Northwest Region now pay

a large share of their inadequate incomes for transportation of neces-

sities and other household goods, which amount could be reduced by the

provision of deep water ports. Furthermore, there are indications that

the cost of extracting Alaska's mineral and other natural resources

will become more competitive as the world's supply of non-renewable

resources dwindles in the coming century. This could create a market

demand sufficient to warrant the mining of coal, tin, gold, phosphates,

and other minerals. At that point, a deep water port could well become

a useful asset.

* * * A note on data availability is appropriate because the study approach

was predicated upon the use of published reports and other available

Page 15: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

xv

materials. The study team found, as expected, that good information

was available for some elements of the study, e.g., data from the 1970

census on population, social and economic characteristics. In other

cases, the absence Of· llseflll, ·consistent; up-to-date, and reliable

information was literally shocking. This is true in particular with

respect to statistics in the transportation sector. The data that are

available are frequently either collected or tabulated in such a manner

as to make them virtually useless for analytic or planning purposes.

Much of the transportation sector is not covered by any systematic

process of reporting and statistical compilation. In many cases it

was found that government agencies did not have either the responsibility

or the authority to request the kind of information from carriers that

would provide the knowledge essential both for public and private eval­

uation of ongoing and potential activities. In any case, available

data were almost always two to three years out of date.

We urge strongly that much greater emphasis be given by govern­

ment agencies, both federal and state, to the collection and tabula­

tion of all data required for effective economic and transportation

planning. We make this recommendation with the knowledge of the fact

(1) that the public officials concerned with transportation in particular

were as frustrated as we by the lack of useful data, and (2) that we

received the fullest cooperation from every transportation carrier

or other firm that we approached for information. We did not find

one case where there was reluctance to cooperate with us; what problems

were encountered were due to the fact that the information we sought

had frequently either not been collected or had been recorded in a

form not useful for this study.

Page 16: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help
Page 17: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

CHAPTER I THE REGION

Physical Features

Population

Economy

Page 18: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

2

Physical Features

"Northwest" Alaska is defined for the purposes of this study as

that portion of the state north and west of the Yukon River drainage. -- -·'"·-···-.......... _______ " ___ .... ,~ .. - -· . ··-----·-·····----- ···-·· ····----·---···------ --.. ---~--

It is almost totally arctic in character in the coastal and mountainous

areas with only a few of the more sheltered valleys having trees. It

' is the only truly arctic area in the United States and its 150,000

square miles make up about one-fourth of the land area of Alaska.

Although the region has a relatively long coastline, there is no deep

water port in Northwest Alaska.

The region falls naturally into three major geographic provinces

(see Figure I-1): first, the Seward Peninsula; second, the Kobuk Valley

and the associated coastal areas around Kotzebue Sound; and, third, the

area known as the North Slope stretching from the summits of the Brooks

Range to the Arctic Coast. These areas have widely varying physiographic

1 differences while retaining their essentially arctic character. The

outstanding climatic characteristics of the region are long cold winters,

short cool summers, a great deal of wind and light precipitation.

Seward Peninsula

Most of the Seward Peninsula consists of an upland area of broad

hills and ridges separated by sharply defined v-shaped valleys. Lowland

basins occupy much of the central interior section that is drained by

the Kuzitrin River. The Kobuk Valley is the major feature of the eastern

part of the region. The peninsula measures about 120 miles from north

to south and 200 miles from' east to west.

The coastal areas of 'the Seward Peninsula vary from the steep

forested headlands around Cape Darby in the northeast corner of Norton

Page 19: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

CHUKCHI SEA

..

NORTON SOUND

. -

BEAUFORT SEA

NORTIH SLOP '

" c~. ______._ ,._/' ~ tg ~ --- -·~{~ v ~

,,,,,,,,.- --....... RIVER , ~ ~ ,,,,,,.,,,. • ............. ~ l ,,.,.,,,. ..... f" ...... ' . ...

' )" I ' I ..._ I . ..... ., I I I I

I UNALA~EE

I

' ...... "'"'o!.' _.,,,,.,. If,, ----' -----

' -­<...-\ I I

'/ /

RtViR....,...__ _,/ ,,-----/' tti..f'"

Figure 1-1

Northwest Alaska, Regions, Major Population Centers and Major Rivers

...

Page 20: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

4

Sound, through the barely vegetated, high mineralized hills that rise

abruptly from the beaches at Cape Prince of Wales, to the broad coastal

plain that characterizes the Peninsula's northern shore.

The climate is influenced by !:he surrounding ller:l.i:ig ari'd ChukchT

Seas and is essentially arctic maritime with cooler summers and warmer

winters than the more interior regions of Alaska. The western coastal

towns and villages have average annual temperatures about ten degrees I

higher than those on the Arctic coast due to the moderating influence

of the warmer Bering Sea. Nome's coldest month, January, averages

ll.5°F which is about 20°F warmer than the January average for Fairbanks.

Table I-1 lists the monthly temperature and precipitation figures for Nome.

Due to its proximity to the Aleutian low pressure area and its accom-

panying Pacific storm belt, the Seward Peninsula suffers from cloudy and

windy days during much of the year. The Peninsula is in a boundary area

between the storm belt and the quiet zone of the Alaskan and East Siberia

Arctic; the Peninsula can suffer extremes of weather especially in the

interior valleys where the moderating influence of the sea is diminished.

Precipitation in the southern half of the Peninsula is almost double

that in the northern portion which averages only about ten inches per

year. Host of the rainfall occurs during the latter half of the summer.

The Seward Peninsula as a whole is essentially an arid region; the

lack of water is a problem for industries which require large quantities

of it, such as placer mining. Only the Kuzitrin River valley has an

adequate supply of fresh water.

The average wind speed for the coastal areas in winter is about

12 miles per hour, though peaks of 70 miles per hour occur during

Page 21: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

! r--·-_, ___ ·--- , ,

I

5

occasional storms. A relatively disagreeable winter climate is caused

by a combination of cool dampness and constant wind.

Month

January February March Apdl May June July August September October November December

Annual

Average Temperature and Precipitation, Nome, Alaska

------- ·---- --- --·---·--·-··

Temperature Precipitation (oF) (inches)

11.5 1.02 13.3 . 94 16.3 • 88 28.4 .80 41. 2 .69 52.4 .93 54.6 2 .29 54.2 3.80 47.8 2.67 35.4 1. 71 22.6 1.16 12.9 • 99

32.6 17.$8

Source: U.S. National Weather Service:

Kobuk Valley

Snowfall (inches)

10.3 6.3 8.7 7.3 1. 8

.1

T .5

4.7 9.5 8.2

57.4

The Kobuk Valley may be differentiated as sub-Arctic rather than

Arctic in its eastern reaches. The upper valley is essentially arctic

woodland in character, while the delta and coastal areas exhibit the

arctic climate and physiography of northwestern Alaska. The forests

along the Kobuk River above its delta resemble the central interior

valleys of Alaska.

Page 22: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

6

The climate ranges from maritime coastal with cool summers and

moderate winters at Kotzebue to a typical continental climate in the

upper parts of the valley with temperature ranges from 90°F to -65°F.

··r11e·uppe:iiegions·ar···cne·va:ITe:f··aa····n:oi:····havethe··tm~ess=t· w±n·ds···of··the·

coast areas and chill factors for the two areas vary much less than

their temperatures. Annual precipitation is light averaging about

nine inches. The yearly snowfall is about four feet which accounts

for about one-half of the total precipitation.

It is evident from Table I-2 that the Kobuk and Noatak Rivers pro­

vide the area with a much greater supply of fresh water than is available

in the other regions of the Northwest. Unfortunately, this supply is not

available to the regional population center at Kotzebue which relies on

an uncertain and inadequate water source on the Baldwin Peninsula. Water

will continue to be one of the inhibitors to growth and development in

Kotzebue unless new sources can be found.

North Slope

The Brooks Range describes a huge arc from the Richardson Mountains

on the east through the Davidson and Romanzov systems to the Delong

}lountains on the west where a spectacular dip is made beneath the sea

at Cape Lisburne. The Brooks Range is the northwestern continuation

of the Cordilleran backbone of the Western Hemisphere. Its highest

peak, Mt. Michelson, is only 9,131 feet high. There are only a few

passes that do not terminate in steep headwalls; the best known is

Anaktuvuk Pass with an elevation of 2,100 feet.

The climate of the Brooks Range is essentially continental with

very cold sinks in the valleys and little precipitation on the northern

Page 23: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Name

Seward Peninsula & Norton Sound

Unalakleet Koyuk Nuikluk Kuzitrin

Kobuk Valley & Kotzebue Sound

Buckland Selawik Kobuk Noatak

North Slope

Kuk Meade Ikpikpuk Colville Kuparuk Sagavanirktok

7

Table I-2

Major Rivers of Northwest Alaska

~ ·-· ~--.. Drainage Area (Square Miles)

2 ,080 1,968 2 ,189 2,600

2 ,850 4,540

11, 980 12,597

4,178 3 ,850 4,540

24 ,000 3,659 5 ,546

Estimated Average ·1engtii ofMaTn: ···· AnntiaIF'low- ·

Stream (Miles) (Cubic ft. per Second)

65 122

70 85

110 160 347 396

42 230 169 428 183 166

2,000 2,165 2,250 1,915

1,840 5,350

15 ,450* 10, 900

2,130 1,925 2 ,270

12 ,000* 1,830 2' 770

*Navigable by barge with three-foot draft.

Page 24: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

8

flanks of the range. The sunnner climate is pleasant and free from the

fogs of the coastal areas. The Arctic foothills extend from the Canning

River on the east to the vicinity of Cape Lisburne. The southern part

of the area consists ot isolated hills reachihg altitUdeS Up to 3;700

feet, with the northern foothills having greater topographic regularity.

The coastal plain is a region of thousands of lakes and swamps with

few areas of well drained soil except along the riverbanks and coastal

verges. The northern coast bordering on the Beaufort Sea consists

mainly of long, straight, sandy beaches and spits, broken by a series

of lagoons. The Chukchi seacoast west of Point Barrow is relatively

free of barrier and offshore islands except around Peard Bay and Icy

Cape.

The North Slope lies in the area of minimum cyclonic activity in

the Arctic. In contrast to the Atlantic and Pacific storm belts which

fringe it, the weather is clear, fairly calm, and often very cold.2

The frequent onshore fogs that beset Barrow and other arctic coastal

connnunities are a result of the calm air conditions in the area and

the proximity of open lands in the arctic ice pack to the cold land

mass. As the ice pack solidifies during the later part of the winter,

continental air masses stabilize over the arctic basin and bring periods

of clear cold weather with constant winds. The average wind speed at

Barrow is 12 miles per hour.

The prevailing winds of the region are northeasterly in winter

and for a good part of the sunnner. Occasional southerly winds occur

when a deep low pressure area develops in the Bering Sea. In sunnner

or during periods when the ice pack is not stable, these winds can

Page 25: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

9

cause severe erosion and ice scour problems along the Chukchi seacoast.

An occasional severe northeasterly wind will cause the same effect on

the Beaufort coast. Monthly temperature readings and precipitation

Month

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Annual

Table I-3

Average Temperature and Precipitation, Barrow, Alaska

Temperature Precipitation (oF) (inches)

-16.2 .18 -18. 3 .17 -14. 6 .ll

. 2 • ll 18.4 .12 33.1 . 36 39.1 • 77 37.9 .90 30.5 .64 16.6 .50

• 7 .23 -ll. 2 .17

9.6 4.26

Source: U.S. National Weather Service.

Snowfall (inches)

2.4 2.3 2.0 2.2 1. 9 0.5 o. 7 0.6 3.0 7.1 3.8 2.8

29.3

The North Slope exhibits the physical characteristics of a well

watered region with its many lakes and swamps but has the climatic

aspects of a desert with its low rainfall. Extremely poor drainage

is caused by the flat gradient of the coastal plain and the underlying

permafrost, with the low evaporation rate further compounding the probl"m.

Page 26: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

10

Lack of a potable water supply has been· and will continue to be

one of the major deterrents to settlement and development on the North

Slope. Only the Colville River offers a reasonably adequate supply of

surface water and its flow is extremely low by the et1d. .;[";;.;inter: Mariy

of the smaller streams become dry during the long months when their

major sources are frozen. No subsurface water is available due to

the layer of permafrost ranging up to 1,330 feet in thickness. Lakes

have been a traditional source of fresh water, but their.slow replenish-

ment rate limits them to very low volume utilization.

Population

Growth and Distribution

The population of Northwest Alaska has fluctuated sharply from

census to census since 1740, starting at a high of 28,000 and falling

as low as 3,498 in 1890. Levels near the present one ocsurred 130

years ago (1840) and 60 years ago (1910). (See Table 1-4 and Figure

J 1-2.) Since 1920, however, the population of the Northwest has shown

a slow and continuing growth. While slower than the growth of the

J rest of Alaska, the_ increase has resulted in roughly a doubling of

regional population. During the same period, however, the Northwest

Region's population as a portion of the state's tbtal has steadily

decreased from 13 percent in 1929 to 4.2 percent in 1970.

As indicated in Table 1-5, Northwest Alaska is overwhelmingly

Eskimo, and the percentage of Eskimos in the Northwest population

('actually increased from 79 percent in 1960 to 82.6 percent in 1970.

Almost half of the Northwest Alaska population now lives in three

Page 27: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Source:

11

Table I-4

Alaska's Population, Population Increase, Percent Increase, and Percent Distribution by Region, 1740-1970

Year Total Southeast Southcentral Southwest Interior Northwest

Population

1710 74,700 ll,!:100 3,700 26,000 5,200 28,000 1R40 40,716 '9,260 4,157 11,299 4»00 12.000 1880 33,426 7,7<\8 4,352 13,914 2,568 4,844 1890 32,052 8,0.18 6,112 12,071 2,333 3,<\98 1900 63,592 1'1,350 10,000 '3,000 5,600 20,642 1910 64,356 15,216 12,900 12,049 13,064 ll,127

J920 55,036 17,<102 11,173 11,541 7,964 6,956 192" 59,278 19,304 ll,880 12,118 8,246 7,730 1939 72,524 25,241 14,881 12,IHG 10,345 9,211 1950 128,643 28,203 50,093 17,715 23,008 9,624 1960 226,167 35,403 108,851 21,001 49,128 11,781 1970 302,647 '42,565 163,758 26,679 56,799 12,846

Population Increase Over Preceding Census

1740 1840 ·33,98-1 ·2,540 "' ·14,701 ·1,200 ·16,000 1880 ·7,290 ·l,512 195 2,615 ·1,432 ·7,156 1890 ·l,374 290 1,760 1,843 ·235 ·1,316 1900 31,540 6,312 3,888 929 3,267 17,1'14 1910 764 866 2,900 .951 7,461 ·9,fl15 1920 ·9,320 2,166 ·l,727 ·1,459 ·5,100 ·4,171 192" 4,242 1,902 707 '77 282 774 1939 13,246 5,937 3,001 728 2,099 1.461 1950 56,119 2,962 35,212 4,869 12,623 413 1960 97,524 7,200 58,758 3~86 26,120 ~160 1970 76,480 7,162 54,907 5,678 7,671 1,062

Percent Increase Over Preceding Census

1740 1840 ·45.5 ·21.5 124 -56.5 ·23.1 -57.1

« 1880 ·17.9 ·61.3 4.7 23.1 ·35.8 ·59.6 ..,1890 ·4.1 3.8 40.4 ·13.2 ·9.2 ·27.8

1900 o.ut;.. 98.4 76.5 63.6 7.7 140.0 461.5 "1910-\' 1.2 6.0 29.0 .7.3 133.3 ·46.l J1920 ·14.5 14.4 ·13.4 -4.2 ·39.0 ·37.5 ,/1929 1.1 10.9 6.3 5.0 3.5 11.1 .-1939 22.3 30.7 25.3 6.0 25.5 19.2 ~·1950 77.4 11. 7 236.6 37.9 122.4 4.5 . 1960 75.8 25.5 117.3 18.5 113.5 22.4 ,· 1970 33.8 20.2 '°·' 21.0 15.6 9.0

1'''

Percent Distribution by Region

1740 100.0 15.fl 4.9 34.8 7.0 37.5 lA-10 100.0 22.7 10.2 27.8 9.8 29.5

""" 100.0 23.2 13.0 41.6 1.1 14.5 JH!JO 100.0 25.I 19.l 37.6 7.3 10.9 1900 100.0 22.6 15.7 20.4 &8 32.5

1910 100.0 23.6 20.t 18.7 20.3 17.3 1920 100.0 :11.6 20.3 21.0 14.5 12.6 1929 100.0 32.6 20,0 20.5 13.9 13.0

1939 100.0 34.8 20.5 17.7 14.3 12.7 1950 100.0 21.9 3fl.9 13.8 17.9 7.9 1960 IOO.O 15.7 48. t 9.3 2J.7 5.2 1970 100.0 14.1 5·l.l 8.8 18.8 4.2

Peter C. Lin, "Alaska's Population and School Enrollments," Alaska Review of Business and Economic Conditions, University of Alaska, Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, Vol. V.III, No. 5, Fairbanks, December 1971.

Page 28: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

300

250

200

100

00

Source:

12

Figure I-2

Population of Alaska by Regions, 1740-1970

TOT L SOUTHEAST SOUTH CENTRAL SOUTHWEST

INTERIOR NORTHWEST

I /.

I / /

/ L- /~-~'--

·""l""'""•··~ro ~~~· =~.~~5 :;:;.'."'.".~-··;.~- -. 0 ;;

Peter C. Lin, op. cit., p. 25.

g •

Page 29: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

13

Table I-5

Alaska's Population by Race and Region, 1960 and 1970

All Eskimo & Chinese, Other Year Region Races White Negro Indian Aleut Japanese & Race

Filipino

1960 STATE TOTAL 226,167 174,546 6, 771 14,444 27 ,571 1, 769 1,066 Southeast 35' 403 25,354 197 7,887 1,204 610 151 Southcentral 108,851 98,733 3,900 1,699 3,300 704 515 Southwest 21,001 6; 381 147 1,161 13 ,087 159 66 Interior 49,128 41,789 2,431 3,684 670 270 284 Northwest 11, 784 2, 289 96 13 9,310 26 50

1970 STATE TOTAL 300,382 236,767 8,911 16,276 34,609 2,411 1,408 Southeast 42,565 33,200 201 7,625 537 802 200 Southcentral 162,001 145,390 5,436 3,015 6,364 1,049 747 Southwest 26,491 8,719 344 1,180 15,935 224 89 Interior 56,479 47,389 2,884 4,419 1,159 305 323 Northwest 12,846 2,069 46 37 10 ,614 31 49

Percent Distribution of Alaska's Population by Race and Region 1960 & 1970

1960 STATE TOTAL 100.0 77 .2 3.0 6.4 12.2 0.8 0.4 Southeast 100.0 71.6 0.6 22.3 3.4 1. 7 0.4 Southcentral 100.0 90.7 3.6 1.6 3.0 0.6 0.5 Southwest 100.0 30.4 0.7 5.5 62.3 0.8 0.3 Interior 100.0 85.1 4.9 7.5 1.4 0.5 0.6 Northwest 100.0 19.5 0.8 0.1 79.0 0.2 0.4

1970 STATE TOTAL 100.0 78 .8 3.0 5.4 11.5 0.8 0.5 Southeast 100.0 78.0 0.5 17 .9 1.2 1.9 0.5 Southcentral lilO. O 89.7 3.6 1.8 3.9 0.6 0 ·'• Southwest 100.0 32.9 1.3 4.5 60.2 0.8 0.3 Interior 100.0 83.9 5.1 7.8 2.1 0.5 0.6 Northwest 100.0 16.1 0.4 0.3 82.6 0.2 0.4

Percent Change in Alaska's Population Between 1960 and 1970 by Race and Region

STATE TOTAL 32.8 35.6 31.6 12.7 25.5 36.3 32.1 Southeast 20.2 30.9 2.0 -3.3 -55.4 31.5 32.5 Southcentral 48.8 47.3 39.4 77 .5 92.8 49.0 45.0 Southwest 26.1 36.6 31+ .o 1.6 21.8 40.9 31, .8 Interior 15.0 918.6 20.0 73.0 13.0 13. 7 Northwest 9.0 ('_-9 .6 52 .1 184.6 14 .o 19.2 -2.0

S.ource: Peter c. Lin, OJ2 • cit. ~ p. 33.

Page 30: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

14

large villages or regional centers: Nome, Barrow and Kotzebue (Table

I-6). "Urbanization" is the word used in Alaska to describe migration

from a small village to a regional center, which may itself have a

population of only 2,000. At the time of the 1939 census, only a

quarter of the region's residents lived in the three large villages.

It is apparent from this table that the rate or urbanization is appar-/

ently decreasing, from ten percent per decade between 1930-50, to six

percent per decade from 1950-70.

Table I-6

Urbanization Process in Northwest Alaska, Reflected in Percentage Increase of the Population

Living in the Regional Centers of Barrow, Kotzebue, and Nome, 1939-70

Population Regional Center 1939 1950 19fi0

Barrow 363 951 1,314 Kotzebue 372 623 1,290 Nome 1,600* 1,876 2,316

Regional Center 'Total 2 ,355 3,450 4 ,920

Regional Total 9 ,321 9,no 12,008

Percent Population Living in Centers 25% 35% 41%

*Estimated because census figures were not available.

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

1970

2 ,104 1,696 2,488

6,288

13,:f48

47%

However, migration patterns for Northwest Alaska can be traced only

in their broad outline since little movement data has been collected.

Page 31: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

15

As Rogers shows in Alaska Native Population Trends and Vital Statistics,

1950-85, Nome experienced an in-migration from the smaller villages

during the 1950's; but then during the next decade served as a staging

area for further migration of Eskimos to other parts of Alaska, pr in-

cipally Anchorage, or a return to the villages. Barrow, meanwhile, had

a slow increase during the 1950's that accelerated during the 1960's

and apparently retained most of the in-migration from smaller commu-

3 nities. In fact, 69 percent of the North Slope's population lives

in Barrow, and only three other villages are large enough to merit in-

clusion in census returns. Kotzebue has apparently struck a mean between

the other two regional centers of the Northwest. There has been some

staging to other areas but a substantial part of the in-migration has

remained in Kotzebue. Air transport patterns and fare differentials

in the 1950's meant that migration from Barrow historically trended

towards Fairbanks while migration from Kotzebue and Nome was to both

Fairbanks and Anchorage, mostly the latter. Another factor that has

affected migration is the large Native Health Service hospital in

Anchorage.

There is some evidence that village populations ha1e been main­

taining themselves even with intensive out-migration, 4 but the birth

rate in Northwest Alaska is now lower than the rate of migration.

Increase in total population between 1960-70 in the Northwest was 585

people, while the regional centers gained more than 1,300 in popula-

tion during that period. The birth rate slowed markedly after 1965.

The 1970 resident increase for the entire area of Northwest Alaska

was only 214 people against a 1960-65 increase of 371. Large-scale

Page 32: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

16

migration to regional cenLers and cities coupled with a declining birth

rate presages the disappearance of many small villages. Without some

sort of rejuvenation in the form of employment of other income-producing

activity, some amount of the increasingly educated and sophisticated

population is likely to react to the Northwest Region's lack of oppor­

tunity by leaving it entirely.

The total population for the Northwest Region appears in Table I-7.

It should be noted that the Barrow Census District and the Eastern North

Slope (Area 1 of the Upper Yukon Census District) are included in the

area referred to in this study as the "North Slope." Table I-8 breaks

down the region into communities. A small permanent settlement is also

growing up around the oil development camps at Prudhoe Bay and Deadhorse,

with a combined population of 212 in 1970. It is doubtful that oil field

headquarters, which will be essentially bachelor camps rather than

villages, will generate many supporting jobs in the area after devel­

opment is ended, other than communications and airlines personnel. The

population, other than the estimated 400 oil company personnel who will

operate the field, will most likely not exceed 200 in the immediate

Prudhoe Bay/Deadhorse area. Other oil exploration activity in the

central Alaskan Arctic could generate a temporary surge of population

for the exploration period as occurred in 1968 and 1969.

Age and Sex Composition

The people of Northwest Alaska are young and predominantly male.

The youthfulness of the population is due to high birth rates from 1955

through 1965,5 and the male predominance is due to the out-migration of

Page 33: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

17

Table I-7

Northwest Alaska, Total Population by Race and Census Districts, 1939-1970

Total Eskimo Non-Native (Military)

Total Northwest Region

1939 9,321 7,802 1,519 1950 9. 770 8,058 1,712 (447) 1960 12,008 9,547 2 ,461 (748) 1970 13,248 10. 752 2,420 (310)

Eastern North s102e (Upper Yukon Census

District, Area I)

1939 145 140 5 n. a. 1950 146 135 11 n.a. 1960 224 200 24 n. a. 1970 402 133 230 n.a.

Barrow Census District

1939 1,450 1,420 30 1950 1,481 1,404 77 (37) 1960 2' 133 1,602 531 (154) 1970 4,663 2,304 349 (90)*

Kobuk Census District

1939 2,666 2,486 180 1950 2,598 2,444 154 1960 3,560 3,203 357 (90) 1970 4,434 3,858 568 (95) *

Nome Census District

1939 5,060 3,756 1,304 1950 5,545 4,075 1,470 ( 410) 1960 6 ,091 4,542 1,549 (504) 1970 5. 749. 4,457 1,273 (125) *

*Preliminary from Department of Defense.

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Adjustments to unifonn districts by George W. Rogers.

Page 34: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

18

Table I-8

Total Population of Northwest Alaska by Census Divisions and Places: 1970

Census Districts Total All Total Non- Estimated Native Estimated Pop. for and Places Races Native Population Indian Esk1rno & Aleut

Barrow Census Divis:lon 2,663 348 2 ,315 10 2,305 Anaktuvuk Pnss city 99 2 97 0 97 Barrow city 2,104 199 1,905 8 1,897 Wainwright city 315 8 307 0 307

Rest of division 145 139 6 2 4

Kobuk Census Division 4,434 576 3 ,858 8 3,850 Ambler (u) 169 10 159 0 159 Buckland city 104 1 103 0 103 Deering (u) 85 2 83 1 82 Kiana city 278 10 268 0 268 Ki valena city 188 5 183 0 183 Kotzebue city 1,696 378 1,318 5 1,313 Noatak (u) 293 7 286 0 286 Noorvik city 462 19 443 0 443 Point Hope city 386 17 369 0 369 Selawik city 429 11 418 1 417 Shungnak. city 165 5 160 1 159 Shungnak Village (u) 56 2 54 0 54

Rest of division 123 109 14 0 14

Nome Census Division 5,749 1,271 4,478 19 4,459 Brevig Mission city 123 5 118 0 118 Diomede (u) 84 2 82 0 82 Elim (u) 174 6 168 0 168 Gambell city 372 16 356 0 356 Golovin (u) 117 6 111 0 111 Koyuk (u) 122 1 121 0 121 Nome city 2,488 964 1,524 18 1.506 St. z.ac~1ael city 207 15 192 0 192 Savoonga city 364 10 354 0 354 Shaktolik city 151 7 144 0 144 Shismaref city 267 18 249 0 249 Stebbins city 231 8 223 0 223 Teller city 220 28 192 0 192 Unalakleet (u) 434 31 403 1 402 Wales city 131 10 121 0 121 White Mountain city 87 3 84 0 84

Rest of division 177 141 36 0 36

Note: The Northwest Region as defined in this study also includes

Source:

the eastern north slope which is included in the Upper Yukon Census Division. In that division north of the Yukon drainage, only Kaktovik is lessened with a population of 123.

Peter C. Lin, op. cit., pp. 35, 37, 38.

Page 35: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

19

young females from the area to marry or find work. (See Table I-9.)

Table I-9

Northwest Alaska, Population by Age and Sex

Population Census District Total Under 21 % Male % Female

Barrow 2,665 1,455 55 1,433 54 1,230 Kobuk 4,434 2,767 62 2 ,320 52 2 ,114 Nome 5,749 3 ,156 55 3,071 53 2,678

Total 12 ,848 7,378 57 6 ,824 53 6 ,022

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970, General Social and Economic Characteristics, Final Report PC (l)-C-3, Alaska.

%

46 48 47

47

The median age in the Barrow area in 1960 was 22 years which fell to

6 19 years by 1970. The falling birth rate will eventually reverse this

trend but the median age may continue to fall for a few more years.

Educational Attainment

Educational attainment for the Northwest is low. There has been

improvement from the median of 5.9 school years completed reported in

1960, to a median of 7.5 years as reported by the 1970 Census. However,

the region is still well below the Alaskan and U.S. averages (both more

than 12 years). 7 In larger villages, the educational level is usually

higher. In the Barrow census district the Alaska Department of Labor

found that the median years of education is 8.2 for the Barrow and

Page 36: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

20

Wainwright villages. In the survey of Kobuk, which included Kotzebue

and 11 small villages, the median years fell to 7.1. (See Table I-10.)

Table I-10

Northwest Alaska, Educational Attainment, Ages· 16-65

Years of School Completed

Percentage of Population Barrow District Kobuk District

0-4 5-6

7 8

9-11 12

13-15 16+

No response

Median Years of Education

14. 5 10.2

7.5 16.3 21.0 17.3 5.5 1.0 6.7

8.2

21.0 18.6 9.0

13. 7 18. 5 13. 2 2.5 2.5 1.1

7.1

Source: Alaska Department of Labor, Manpower Studies for Barrow-Wainwright and for Northwest Alaska.

Table I-11 presents the summary of social characteristics by census

divisions as reported in the 1970 Census and indicates in the ninth col-

umn the high percentage of persons ages 14 to 17 enrolled in schools:

Barrow - 98. 7, Kobuk - 89.2, and Nome - 99.9. As will be seen in column

ten of the same table, the median school years completed for persons 25

years and over for the Nome population is even greater than that for

Barrow and Kobuk.

Page 37: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Table I-11

Sunnnary of Social Characteristics by Census Divisions: l~ [Doto bosed on sarnpJe, see te;ii;t. For minimum bose for derived figures (percenr, ml!ldion, eti;.} ond meonin; of symbols, l.ff te:d}

Census Divisions

n. Stote ----------------Aleut ion Islands ____ -------- __ -- ---- -- -- -- -- --Anthoroge ____________ ---- __ ----------------Aoqoon •• ____ ---- ______ ---- _ ----------------Sorrow __________ .. -------- -----------------Be1hel ---- __________ ------ __ ---- ------------Brislol Boy Borough __ -- __ •••• ----------------· Bri$to! Soy Division •• ________ _ ----------------Cordovc-McCorthy _______ : •••. ----------------foirbonks __________ ---- ---------------·-----Hoinu ·--------- -------Juneau ·- ---- ______________ _ Ktnai-Coak Inlet •••• ________ _ Ketchikan __________ ------ __ _ Kobuk ______ ---- •• -------- •• Kodiak •• ---- ---- __ -- •• ···- _ Kuskokwirn -----------------Molanuska-Susilna ____ ---- __ • Homt •• ____ ---- __ •• ____ ----Outer Kttcbikon ____ •••• _____ _ Prince of Woles --~- ---- ____ -~

Seword ·- ________ •• -- ------ _ Sitko -- -- ·- ·- -- ____ •••• -- -- _ Skogwoy·Yakutol ~- ·- _______ _ Sout~ast foirbonks __ ---- ___ _ Upper Yukon----------------1/olde:-Cbitina-Wbillier Wo~ Homptan --------------Wro1>9eU-Pe1ersburg _______ _

------------------- ----------·----------- ---------------------------------------·------------------------------------------------- -------- -----· ------------------- ---- -- ---- ---·-- -------------·----------- ----·------· ------ --.. ---- ------------ ---- ---- --------------------------------------

Yukon-Koyukuk __ •••• -- ___ _ ---------------

Number

300 312

8 057 12-4 5"2

'81

"" 7 579 9«

"" ! 769 45 952

I '61

13 599 14 250 10 041

.... "' 9 "" 2 275

""' - 5 749 1 771 2 Oil

2 021 6 424 2 037

' 299 I 606 3 !74 3 917 4 913 4 752

•Children ever born per 1.000 women of all maritcl cla~ses.

Total populction

Pet"Cenl n.otive

of Percent f~ign

ruro! Percent Percent or rnixei:I non- rurol foreign parent-lo= ,,,. born age.

49.1 ... • •• .., 98.5 1.5 2.3 7.1 31.l 0.3 2.7 6.7 99.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 97.4 2.6 0.7 3.6 99.• ,. 0.1 ,. 87.9 12.l ... 11.0 90.2 9.6 0.5 7.1 92.7 7.3 •.1 14.4 26.5 0.5 2.9 6.5 97.3 2.7 7.5 12.7

5'.0 0.6 2.9 12.9 72.B 2A 2.3 6.0 26.7 - 3.7 11.8 95.3 '" 0.2 2.3 22.8 3.1 2.7 6.2

100.0 - 0.7 2.3 92.3 7.7 1.9 ... 95.6 '' 1.2 <.6

100.0 - 1.5 18.l 98.l 1.9 0.2 6A

100.0 - 3.1 9.1 42.6 . 5.3 9.9 99.3 0.7 3.6 9.3 99.2 06 2.6 6.0 97.8 2.2 0.7 '" 99A 0.6 2.9 6.8 Sl.2 18.8 - 1.6

"" 1.5 '·' 11.6 966 1.2 1.2 5.1

Children Persons No rive in ele- 25 years Married popu- Pers.ons mentory Persons '"' coupl11s-

lo,tion- S years school- 14 to 17 over- Percent Percen1 '"' Percent ~rs- Median without f«idin; over- m Percent school ,., in State Percent private ,, yeori houu-af birth migrant schoal ~hool camplettc:I ''"

31.7 41.1 2.3 91.0 12.4 I.I

26.8 55.4 5.2 91.6 12.3 2.0 20.I 44.9 0.6 91.2 12.6 0.6 89.0 •.3 - 99.9 9.9 -87.0 17.3 2.2 96.7 6.6 3.6

"" 9.5 6A 80.3 •. o 2.2 30.6 63.1 - "" 12.5 -85.0 6.6 10.1 90.2 "' 1.6 41.9 31.1 - 89.3 12.4 -18.9 50.I 2.7 88.9 12.6 0.7 55.7 3'.1 - 61.S l 1.6 3.5

36.1 35.3 O.• 98.J 12.7 0.5 20.5 52.4 0.7 93.6 12.4 ... 36.7 31.6 3.3 69.9 12.4 I.I 89.7 10.S 15.8 89.2 7.0 5.5 31.6 49.3 "' 92.5 12.3 1.3 71.9 26.1 5.1 90.2 7.9 -"·' "" 1.7 93.5 12.3 0.1 6'1.6 16.2 1.7 99.9 6.3 7.5 53.9 '6.7 - 98.0 12.2 12.8 34.1 44.6 ... 87.8 12.0 1.3

32.3 '3.1 1.0 77.4 12.2 -36.1 38.1 3.5 99.9 12.4 1.7 51.1 15.5 - 83. l 12.1 2.1 23.5 44.9 - 98.S !2.4 -66.6 26.2 5.6 6'.9 9.2 -42.0 "" - 78.4 12.2 0.7 91.0 ll.1 9.5 89.5 3.5 16

"" 27.5 . 91.0 12.l -53.0 28.5 3.1 94.2 12.1 .

Pen.ons Families- under 18

Ptreent yeors-with Percent ,., living

chfldrtn with undtr both

6 yeori parents

37.6 U.3

49.5 89.I 37.3 66.6

"'" 84.5 47.l ·80.0

"" "" 35.6 76.3 '6.6 87.7 22.8 80.7 39.5 88.l 3'.5 '89.4

31.l 81.1 33.7 ':86.6

"" ·a1.3 ..... 75.9 39.3 :S7.3 49.6 ·66.3 26.7 81.6 37.9 75.3 39.9 "87.7 35.8 90.6

17.l 83. l 36.8 86.7 30.6 , 76.9 40.2 83.3 23.8 66.8 26.7 81.7 63.9 83.4 31.2 89.4 49.l 84.5

Note: The difference in age group for which the data are shown in Tables I-9 and I-10 accotmts for some of the apparent discrepancy in median educational attainment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970, General Social and Economic Characteristics, Final Report PC(l)-C3.

Women 35 to u yeors-

Cu mu-lotive

ferti61y rate'

3 3.53

3 .. 7 2 978

' 305

""" "" 3 976

"" 3330

2 952 3 139 3 513 6 571

2 "" 6 617 3 525 4 625

' 636

"" ""' 3 523 4 587

"'" 6 027 2 932 7 847

"" 4 917

N .....

Page 38: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

22

Economy

Rural Alaska, which includes .the Northwest Region, is sometimes

said to have two economies -- one based on subsistence activities and

the other based on wage emJ>loymerit:.. It is perhaps more accurate to

include a third economy, based on welfare payments. As time passes,

however, these distinctions grow more fuzzy since all of the economies

increasingly coexist in every village. In small hunting and gathering

villages such as Kivalena and Anaktuvak, minimal employment or welfare

payments normally provide a source of cash income; in welfare-dependent

larger towns and less self-sufficient villages, such as Nome and Kotzebue,

a consi.derable amount of food continues to be obtained from natural sources.

Those individuals who comprise the wage economy are predominantly white,

and live in villages and towns where the majority of the population is

dependent on a combination of wages and welfare payments and subsistence

activities.

Sources of Food

The degree to which a person depends on locally-gathered animals

and plants for food is an index of his involvement in a subsistence

economy. Hunting and gathering food, providing firewood and other

sourCes of heat, securing water and other basic necessities are the

subsistence economy's equivalent of "work" in a wage economy. SubsiS­

tence activities take up a lot of time, and provide items that could

be purchased with cash.

In 1968, the Bureau of Indian Affairs surveyed food sources in

35 northern coastal and interior villages. They found that about

Page 39: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

23

one-quarter of the adult population received none of their food supply

from hunting, fishing, or trapping. At the other extreme, only one

adult out of every twelve were completely dependent upon these activ-

Hies for food. (See Table 1~12.)

Table I-12

Dependence Upon Food Gathering for Subsistence in 35 Northern Coastal and Interior Villages (1968)

Utilization Number Responding Percent

None at all 384 26 25% from subsistence 356 24 50% " " 468 33 75% " " 135 9 All " " 124 8

Total 1,467 100

A dietary survey conducted between 1956-61 found that locally

gathered foods in four villages of the Northwest supplied 30-46 percent

of the total caloric intake and 67-81 percent of the protein. 8 Since

that survey, the advent of food stamps in rural Alaska has drastically

altered consumption patterns in some villages. The ability to buy pro-

cessed foods has increased the carbohydrate content and decreased the

protein content of the Native diet. In Barrow and elsewhere, dietary

9 imbalances and tooth decay are increasing problems. In Anaktuvak,

on the other hand, eating imported foods has the beneficial side effect

of lowering exposure to strontium 90 and other radionuclides that are

Page 40: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

24

concentrated in the bone marrow of the caribou. Slow-growing lichens

contain substantial amounts of radioactive fallout from the atmosphere

and are the main food of caribou.

The food resources presently available for the existing population

appear more than adequate to maintain a subsistence economy for the

entire area. The Seward Peninsula offers a wide variety of land and

marine mammals in addition to a large variety of fish. Salmon and

seal are staple foods with walrus, beluga whale, and caribou being

important. Sheefish, pike, and whitefish are important fresh water

species. While reindeer are a domestic animal in the main, they con­

stitute the most important staple subsistence resource for the Seward

Peninsula. (See Reindeer Husbandry.)

The Kobuk area is the northernmost region of the state where salmon

occur in large enough quantities to serve as the major subsistence food

source. Caribou and reindeer comprise the most important protein source

after salmon. Marine mammals are less important here than elsewhere in

the Northwest.

On the Arctic and Chukchi coasts sea mammals are the primary sub­

sistence food. In different villages and at different times of the

year, whale, walrus or seal are the most important staple. Fish,

caribou, and birds are eaten in varying amounts, depending in part

upon success in hunting marine mammals.

Wild roots and greens, berries, and small mammals supplement the

diet in all areas of the Northwest. Nowhere has overhunting and over­

fishing meant that inadequate food stocks are available. It is not

the lack of food but the change in life styles that has meant the end

Page 41: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

25

of the subsistence way of life.

The effect of consolidating population into larger settlements

inevitably limits the subsistence living habits and eventually elim­

inates them for a large part of the population. As a village grows

larger, competition for all resources of the land and sea becomes

more intense and it is necessary to make longer hunting and food

gathering trips. Historically, very large villages existed in the

Arctic only where unusual circumstances provided a large relatively

stable food source. Villages with access to large numbers of whales

and other marine mammals were traditionally larger than those which

depended upon caribou. Even the greatly expanded mobility offered

by the snow machine cannot overcome the problems of too many hunters

in an area. Winter hunting of caribou and seal can be expanded by

snow machine, but the major part of food gathering, fishing and hunting

is done in the summer when snow machines are useless.

The introduction of the snow machine, like the outboard motor

before it, has brought about another set of changes in subsistence

life styles that work some drastic and some subtle changes in that

style. The general replacement of dog teams by snow machines has

lessened hunting pressure since in many instances a family's dogs con­

sume twice as much meat or fish as the family. Snow machines are

modern, ease winter work and travel, but the added expense may double

a family's cash expenses in a year.

Sources of Cash Income

After the Eskimo's introduction to the benefits of a cash economy,

whale hunting and then fur trapping were in turn the means by which the

Page 42: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

26

Nc:1tive population of Northwest J\]aska earned cash incomes. Conunercial

whale hunting ended around 1900, and then fur prices slumped in the

1940's. Fur prices are unlikely to rise to profitable levels in the

foreseeable future, which leaves wage employment as the~ best source

of earned income. (Game animals such as caribou may neither be sold

nor traded by state law. Another alternative, reindeer herding, has

not proven to be a good source of large amounts of money. See Reindeer

Husbandry.)

The money economy of the Northwest is largely the domain of its

white minority. In most villages and towns, Natives hold few of the

full-time jobs. They usually hold the lowest paying government jobs,

such as postmaster, Head Start instructor, health aide, school main­

tenance man, and in some cases higher salaried positions such as

teacher or Rural Community Action Program administrator. In the pri­

vate sector they may s,erve as station agent for the airline or operate

small stores.

The search for cash income is reflected in the ubiquitous village

coffee shop -- as many as three or four in some small villages none

with enough business to provide a minimal income for one person. How­

ever, coffee shops and other small enterprises provide jobs and training

in the responsibilities of entrepreneurship and employment.

In Kotzebue, Nome, and Barrow, more full-time jobs exist in hos­

pitals and other government facilities, as well as in the private sec­

tor. These opportunities, however, are low paying and available mostly

to women. The jobs are good only by comparison to those in the smaller

villages.

Page 43: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

27

The employment situation will not improve in the smaller villages

unless jobs are created by the state and federal governments or by the

Native Claims Settlement Act corporations, or unless natural resource

development in the immediate area employs local Natives. In the mean-

time, villagers seek employment elsewhere. People from as far north

as Point Hope work in the canneries of Bristol Bay in the summer and

many men find seasonal employment out of the villages as construction

workers or firefighters.

A dual economy -- part subsistence and part cash -- can provide

a reasonable standard of living as long as seasonal employment is avail-

able on a regular basis. Full-time work is inconsistent with subsistence

living, since hunting and fishing are full-time occupations during certain

seasons. The scarcity of seasonal employment results in another form of

dual economy -- part subsistence and part welfare. Almost every village

in Northwest Alaska is almost exclusively dependent on welfare payments

during the winter months.

Employment and Unemployment

The outstanding feature of the labor situation in Northwest Alaska

is widespread unemployment. The Alaska Department of Labor reported an

10 unemployment rate of 29.2 percent in the Kobuk area in 1969, of 22.3

percent in Wainwright and Barrow in 1968, and 18. 7 percent for Nome in

1969. 11

Alaska Department of Labor statistics are based on insured employ-

ment and give an overly optimistic view of the employment picture in

rural Alaska -- grim as the above unemployment figures are, they

Page 44: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

28

considerably tmderstate the real unemployment situation. Firstly,

unemployment insurance does not, in all cases, cover self-employed

or unpaid workers, nor employment in state and local governments,

services, or fisheries~; For example, those Natives who fish part of

the year and are unemployed the rest may not be counted in the state's

data. Secondly, the state unemployment statistics are not broken down

by race and cannot give the true rate of unemployment in the Native

sector.

Thirdly, civilian unemployment figures are calculated as a per-

cent of the labor force -- and in rural Alaska, participation in the

labor force is low compared to total population. Table l-13 shows

1970 U.S. Census data on Alaska employment and unemployment, including

labor force participation, employment in manufacturing, government and

white-collar occupations, and full-time employment. Taking these factors

into account, it has been estimated that Native unemployment probably

amount~d to between 60 and 70 percent throughout rural Alaska in 1969.12

A better indicator of the true condition of labor in the Northwest

is the ratio of employed workers to the total population. These figures

13 show that 27.8 percent of the North Slope population is employed, but

only 13.4 percent of Seward Peninsula residents and 12.8 percent in the

Kobuk area. 14 Overall employment for the entire area was 16.1 percent.

These compare to a statewide percentage of 36.1 and national of 38.5.

By these ratios, unemployment or underemployment is about three times

as great in the Kobuk and Nome areas as it is in the rest of Alaska.

In 1969, 71 percent of 297 people in the Barrow labor force said that

they would move if offered a job elsewhere; and in 1970, 66.8 percent

Page 45: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Table I-13

Summary of Economic Characteristics by Census Divisions: 1970

!Doto based on sample. see text. For minimum bow for derived figures {perctl'!t, medion, etc.) one! mtoning of symbol1, a. ltlCT]

Census Divisions

Tit Stllte

Alev1iQn ls!ond~---------··--· Anthoro9e __ -- •••• -· ••••••••

---------------·---------------- -- ------ ---- -

An9oon •• ____ .. ____ ---- •••• _ ·--------------lklrrow ···--- -··- __ --------­Se1~1 ••••••••.•••• - -------· 8ristol Soy 8oro1,19h --·---·--· Bri$tol Boy Division ••••••••••• Cordovo·MC((lrThy •• __ •••••• _ foirllonks Hoines

Juneov •••• ----·--- --·- ••••• Kenoi·Co-ok !nlel -------··----Ketchikon ____ •• ·- •••••••••• _ l(obuk •• ---- __ ·-·- ......... . l(odiok -----------.--------· Kvskol<wim ----------------­Mo1onusko-Susitno •••• __ ---- _ Home •• -- -- ••••• _ ---··----· Outer l(efchikon •••• __ ...... .. Prince of Wolu ••••••••••••••

Seword .. __ •••• -· •• __ -- •••• -Sitko ____ •• __ .... __ •• ____ •••

Sko9wor·Yoku!O! --·--------· Sovth~S! foirb(lnh UpperYvkon ··---------··--­Voklt2.(hi1ino.whiftier ·- __ •••• Wode Hampton •••• W ron9ell·Pe!ersbur9 Yukon.l(oyukvk •••• -· -- •• --

. -------- -------- -- -- ---- -----·- -------------. -- -- ---- -- ----. -- -- -- ------ ------- ---- --------- -- -- .. -- -- ----------------------------------- ------------·----------------- ---------------------------------------- ---- -- ------ -- ----- --------------------- ---- ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------·-------------------------------- -- "' -- -- -- -- -

Femofe. 16

Nonworker- y&ars worker "' n:itio over

1.21 .... 0.68 31.1 1.15 S0.7 6.85 18.8 2.79 25.4 4.06 J;:i 0.59 4.41 29.6 1.05 49.7 1.00 '6.6 1.85 25.4

0.98 62.8 1.59 ~A l.33 u.7 4.22 28.8 1.>0 :;.1.y 2.80 20.9 2.07 31.7 2.46 39.8

·" " , .... 20.7

l.47 46' 1.18 55.4 !.52 48.7 1.15 34.8 1.51 32.5 1.37 51.1 5.21 16.0 1.52 46.3 l.45 33.6

Pertel'lf in lobar force

Married women, ,.,. husband prestnl

With ,., 65 children 18 to ,~~

under 6 " "' Toto! years yeors over

.. .. 30.3 H.2 36.0

30.6 19.7 96.4 55.9 47.3 32.6 92.4 '4.2 14.9 35.5 14.7 -24.l "'·' 64.5 11.9 1'.6 •O·O ''·' <·• 37.6 u.7 96.2 306 29.9 25.6 -so.o 31.9 83.0 33.9 '3.5 26.8 92.8 57.5 26.2 27.9 66.7 31.8

59.7 49.4 76.4 S0.0 35.5 26.6 80.0 37.0 41.0 22.6 89.5 362 32.6 20.8 45.9 7.0 51.0 J4.o "·' "·' 23.6 18.5 65.9 31.9 21.8 '4.8 25.5 ... 3 33.0 47.l 31.2

---- " 75.5 0, .•

22.6 14.3

... 6 42.1 68.1 32.l 52.2 40.0 8'.4 21.5 43.9 38.S 56.3 42.2 31.6 22.6 96.6 53.7 41.7 37.0 76,3 -49.4 42.7 70.3 15.2 18.3 19.7 56.5 !J.8 "2 33.0 75.7 33.6 32.7 30.5 83.4 29.2

Employed persons Work.cl

during Persons c1nsus who

Percent -·- worked CiviJion ;, Percent Percent ;,

labor monu· ;, working 1969-force- foe- whit~ Percel'lt outside Percent Percent hiring collor !JOvem- county workl'd unem· indus- occupo· ment of resi- 50 to 52 ployed tries tions workers denee WHkS

9.2 7.1 5$.3 36.S 3.3 S•.S

15.0 13.8 '3.& 47.2 0.7 61.l 8.2 3.1 60.0 34.2 2.0 62.3

15.3 10.0 30.0 80.0 - 3.9 11.7 0.7 36:9 59.7 6.0 39.9

"·' -·· ,, .• -..- '·' "·' 26.3 - 62.4 67.3 74.9 59.9 11.2 6.3 52.l 49.0 1.0 22.2

5.0 7.1 38.7 24.7 3.7 38.9 8.0 2.7 57.1 37.5 3.9 56.4 9.5 29.6 36.7 21.4 9.9 45.8

7.5 2.7 73.9 57.9 1.6 58.5 13.9 12.8 '3.9 20.4 1.6 47.4 10.l 19.4 47.6 27.9 2.1 53.7 11.l 2.8 50.3 56.8 3.6 28.3

'" "·' --· ''·' .., ;u.o 19.4 22 47.6 47" - 39.4 11.8 2.2 48.8 33.8 18.4 '4.7 15.7 1.9 47.4 49.7 1.9 28.6

·- < .• 10:0 .ia:o ,, .

2A 74.5 21.2 17.0

12.l 11.9 45.9 41.0 8> 39.5 7.7 26.8 '6.1 32.5 0.2 58.5

!2.4 6.0 4!.8 25.3 - 36.0 13.7 0.9 U.3 49.3 3.0 53.9

7.0 4.0 31.9 21.9 23.l 36. l 12.6 1.6 48.0 45.1 5.2 38.0 !7.3 5.6 '4.1 62.9 3.7 18.9 6.4 34.6 36.8 17.2 0.6 35.2

1!.4 " "'·' 53.0 2.7 44.4

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970, General Social and Economic Characteristics, Final Report, PC (1) - C3.

M&dion income

(dollorsJ

12''3

8 553 13 593

2 "' 8 575 . _, 12 390 6 67!

11 935 12 338 13 '197

16 073 12 969 12 816 6 571

" ·-3 1 .. 10 686

""° , 11 907

11 381 14 09! 1 J 414 9 514 6500

l2 292 3 417

1) 357 13 028

Fomlries

Percent with incom1 of-

Leu Thon

poverty $15,000 level or mart

9.3 37.1

8.1 13. 1 5.0 43.2

97.2 -27.7 15.5 -· l t.i 16.l 20.8 32.8 13.0 10.7 34.5 .., 38.5 2.9 35.8

3.5 54.l : 7.1 39.5

7.8 35.2 '32.3 12.2 ,, ,. " 55.2 16.1 20.4 30.2 31.2 !7.4

'"' 29:2 16.3

10.0 28.3 3.1 43.6

19.0 29.9 13.3 24.6 23.6 25.4 10.7 41.4 96.8 3.1

9.6 27.1 17.6 41.0

N

Page 46: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

30

of 947 people in the Kobuk labor force also stated that they were willing

15 to n1ove to secure employment.

The concentration of government in Barrow has meant that the employ­

ment situation there is better than in the Kobuk and Seward Peninsula

areas. The Naval Arctic Research Laboratory and the major DEW Line in­

stallation offer about 265 jobs to the community and this employment

generates other support jobs. In addition, there are over 100 other

federal and state jobs in the community. However, most of higher paying

jobs are held by temporary white residents of Barrow.

Despite the resurgence of exploration activity in mining and the

oil activity at Prudhoe Bay, industry employment is very low. Few

residents of the Northwest are employed at Prudhoe, and it is most

realistic to treat this development as an employment enclave within

the area that has littl~ or no generative effect upon the local economy.

Mining employment in the Seward Peninsula in the summer of 1971 may

have reached 70 or 80 at times while about 30 persons were reported to

be employed in exploration activity at Bornite. Most of these jobs

were held by Natives except for the engineering and supervisory positions.

Actual totals are not available because of security requirements of the

Alaska Department of Labor reporting system. Unemployment in Nome ranges

from a high of 26.2 in April to a low of 11.4 percent in October.16

The

sources of employment in No1ue are government, tourist services and trans­

portation.

Recent data on per capita income are not available but, in January

1970, a survey in Nome and Kobuk reported that 32 percent of the work­

force in Nome and 68 percent of the workforce in Kobuk had incomes under

Page 47: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

31

$3,000.17

Since the survey covered all employed persons, it is probable

that the above percentages are a fair estimate of family incomes for

the area with some adjustment downwards for the rare families with two

or three incomes.

Page 48: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

32

Footnotes

1. The descriptive material of the geology of the areas was obtained from the U.S.G.S. publication, Landscapes of Alaska, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1958. Primary sources were the chapters by George Crye on the Brooks Range (pp. 111-118) and the Arctic Slope (pp. 119-127) by the same author. Also utilized was the chapter on the Seward Peninsula by J.P. Hopkins and D.M. Hopkins.

2. Most of the climatological explanation is due to R. Kenneth Hare's chapter, "Weather and Climate," in Geography of the Northlands, American Geographical Society, New York, 1955, pp. 58-83.

3. George W. Rogers, "Alaska Native Population Trends and Vital Statis­tics," ISEGR Research Note, November 1971, pp. 5-6.

4. Arthur E. Hippler, "Some Observations on the Persistence of Alaska Native Village Populations," ISEGR Research Note A-1, September 1969.

5. George W. Rogers, op. cit., p. 17.

6. Ibid.

7. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population: 1970; General Social and Economic Characteristics, Final Reports, PC (1)-6-3, Alaska.

8. Christine A. Heller and Edward M. Scott, The Alaska Dietary Survey, 1956-61, Public Health Service, Arctic Health Research Center, Anchorage (now at Fairbanks), 1967.

9. Arthur E. Hippler, From Village to Town: An Intermediate Step in the Acculturation of Alaska Eskimos, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, October 1970.

10. Workforce Estimates, U.S. Department of Labor, 1970.

11. Alaska Department of Labor, Manpower Survey, Barrow-Wainwright Area, July 1969, p. 12.

12. Judith Kleinfeld and Thomas A. Morehouse, Manpower Needs in Alaska, ISEGR, University of Alaska, August 1970.

13. Prudhoe Bay oilfield employment not included.

14. Figures compiled from Manpower Surveys of the areas involved. State and national figures obtained from Manpower Survey, Barrow-Wainwright area.

15. Alaska Department of Labor, Barrow-Wainwright area, and Kobuk area Manpower Surveys.

16. Alaska Department of Labor, Manpower Survey, Nome Area, January 1970.

17. Manpower Surveys, Nome and Kobuk.

Page 49: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

CHAPTER II ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: PRESENT AND POTENTIAL

Minerals and Mining

Oil and Gas

Fisheries and Aquatic Animals

Reindeer Husbandry

Tourism and Recreation

Page 50: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

34

Minerals and Mining

Next to federal and state spending, mining and tourism were the

major components of the cash economy of Northwest Alaska until the

discovery of oil at Prudhoe Bay. The Seward Peninsula, and to a

lesser degree the Kob.uk Valley, have historic ties with the gold mining

industry dating back to the Gold Rush of 1898. Until World War II, the

white population of the Seward Peninsula was reasonably prosperous. The

decline of gold mining in the last three decades depleted the white popu­

lation and steadily reduced the natural resources base of the Northwest's

economy.

There have been sporadic efforts by both private industry and

government to overcome the barriers to exploration and development of

the known and indicated mineral reserves of this part of Alaska. Figure

II-3 (p. 46) is a locator map for the existing and potential mineral and

oil developments mentioned in the text. The general consensus has been

that if the transportation problem could be solved all other economic

inhibitions to development would be overcome. This study concludes

that transportation is not in fact the key to mineral development in

Northwest Alaska, but rather, it is the development of market demand

sufficient to pay the high costs of Alaska production and transport.

In recent years large mining concerns have shown renewed interest

in Northwest Alaska, some spurred by the general excitement created by

the Prudhoe Bay discovery and others by a desire to find reserves at

home in a politically secure nation, rather than in the more volatile

underdeveloped and developing world.

Spangler has listed five reasons why companies seek and hold mineral

Page 51: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

35

leases in Norton Sound; this list applies generally to onshore and off-

shore holdings in all of Northwest Alaska. The five reasons for holding

on to mineral lands are:

A tendency to retain speculative holdings because the cost of the original leases was not large in many cases and the annual cost of maintaining leases was small.

An expectation that the price of gold will sooner or later be increased substantially as the U.S. gold reserve shrinks and pressure mounts to de­value the dollar.

Hope that rich pay streaks will be found that can be mined at a profit under present conditions.

The possibility that offshore mining will be re­duced in cost due to technological advances.

A belief that federal subsidies, especially tax incentives, will be available soon for underwater mining and exploration.l

It should be noted that none of the five reasons for holding mineral

leases are reasons to start active work on them, nor is the availability

of transportation a consideration. As the following review will show,

the three subsectors of Northwest Alaska have very different prospects

and problems in mining.

Seward Peninsula

The Seward Peninsula is regarded as one of the most highly mineral-

ized areas in Alaska. Beginning with the dsicovery of gold in 1898, the

following minerals have been located and produced in significant quanti-

ties: gold, tin, tungsten, and beryllium. Small amounts of antimony,

bismuth, copper, silver, lead and quicksilver have also been found but

no large deposits of these metals are known. A residual iron deposit

Page 52: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

36

occurs near Nome, while zinc, arsenic, uranium and molybdenum occur

in or near the tin and base metal lodes. 2 Platinum, manganese, mica,

fluorite and graphite have also been reported. 3

A fluorite and beryllium mining venture at Lost River by Lost River

Mining Corporation, an affiliate of Pacific Canadian Explorations (PCE)

of Toronto, Canada, is the only immediate hope for a new surge of mining

activity in Northwest Alaska. The major interest now is fluorite which

is expected to command a premium price on the world market for the next

five years. The Japanese steel industry has shown interest in the fluorite

production possibilities at Lost River and is regarded as the best market

4 at this time. The U.S. now imports 80 to 90 percent of its needs in

fluorite so a strong domestic market may develop. 5 PCE's mining engineers

now predict that there are 30 million tons of ore reserves at Lost River

which would permit processing 4,000 tons per day when the mine is in

active operation.

There are long-range problems to mining in the southwestern corner

of the Seward Peninsula that will not be easily overcome. Foremost is

the lack of water. Previous mining efforts have encountered problems

with maintaining sustained sources of surface and subsurface water. The

current venture hopes to overcome the shortage by building a dam and im-

pounding the spring runoffs. However, all of the valleys in the region

have small catchment areas. Large-scale mining enterprises may require

the buidling of several dams, the importing of water from the nearest

major freshwater source (the Kuzitrin River) or the use of sea water.

Another problem to be overcome is shipping. PCE has completed

some initial surveys for a quay extending 5,000 feet into the Bering

Page 53: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

37

Sea at a depth of up to 40 feet. PCE is negotiating for federal and/or

state assistance in the financing of the port because a deep water port

would benefit the area as a whole. PCE feels that the economics of ore

movements make it imperative that the dock is close to the mine site.

They point out that the Seward Peninsula highway system's nearest point

at Teller is only 24 miles from Lost River and that backhauls from the

United States and Japan on the ore freighters would make cheap freight

6 for Nome and other communities on the road system a reality. However,

the backhaul scheme runs counter to the current trend of specialization

in vessels, and is unlikely to materialize.

The long-range plans for Lost River envision a town of 1,500 people

to serve as a base for the present and future mining ventures in the

area. Present plans by the mining company are for the town to be laid

out under the auspices of the Alaska State Housing Authority and for a

7 portion of the costs to be borne by the state.

Maintenance of a work force in a company town in this area may not

be as easy as is presently supposed. The present employment at Lost

River is in large part composed of Natives from nearby villages and

some miners from Kiana trained by Kennecott in their Bornite explora-

tions. These men may wish. to continue to commute for intermittent

work periods from their home villages rather than move their families.

Ideally, the mining operations in this area would absorb the surplus

labor force now idle on the Seward Peninsula. Alaska Natives may prefer

to work in their own enterprises when land claims are settled, in which

8 case local labor mai not be available.

Page 54: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

38

Gold mining on the Seward Peninsula has stopped. 9 Mining opera­

tions began in 1898, and annual production of gold on the Seward Penin­

sula peaked in 1906 at $7.5 million, then gradually decreased until

1931. Production in terms of volume continued to decline until 1934,

when the newly established price of gold at $35 an ounce brought about

a resurgence in activity that lasted until 1942.

The inability of the mining companies to secure either materials

or men during World War II caused a drastic curtailment of mining that

lasted until 1947. There was a brief buildup for five years and then

overall price increases in Alaska caused by Dew Line construction,

plus national inflation, brought about the decline of the gold mines.

Hore than $175 million in gold has been extracted from the Peninsula

since mining began. 10

Today there is no gold mining industry on the Seward Peninsula.

The increase in the price of gold caused by the recent devaluation

does not change the diseconomies of mining gold for sale at a fixed

price.

In the past three years renewed interest has been generated in

offshore exploration programs in Norton Sound. Large companies, such

as Shell and American Smelting and Refining (ASARCO), have shown in-

terest in the seabed resources. Core drillings have found a wide dis­

tribution of gold-bearing bottom sediments off Nome and in areas to the

east of that city. Estimates have been made of values as high as $150

million per acre and $2 billion total in gold alone for the offshore

areas around the Seward Peninsula. These conjectural estimates are

an indicator of the possible potential of the seabed of Norton Sound

Page 55: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

39

and other coastal waters of the Peninsula.11

In the opinion of almost all dredging and gold mining engineers,

however, the initiation of a successful offshore placer gold mining

operation at Nome will require a capital investment of $50 to $100

million. Of the several companies interested in offshore mining in

the area only two have ever invested more than $1 million in Alaska

ld d f h b . f d d . d 12 marine go ventures an ew ave een active or an exten e perio .

The capital required for a large-scale operation appears unlikely to

materialize.

The City of Nome has discussed plans for dredging a deep water

13 port and recovering a large part of the costs through gold recovery.

The project would be able to use the dredges now in storage at Nome.

The Martin Dredging Company of Nome has used a hydraulic dredge on its

underwater holdings near Bluff but the degree of its success is not

known.

On the basis of onshore gold production the U.S. Geological Survey

has inferred potential placer deposits worth $120 million offshore in

the vicinity of the Seward Peninsula. The minimum conditions for com-

mercial exploitation of such deposits are a concentration of gold of

40 cents per ton, within three miles of shore, in less than 60 feet of

14 water, and with less than 100 feet of overburden.

Unless the USGS estimate of placer deposits is at least doubled

by the discovery of especially rich areas, the outlook is not favorable

that the large sums necessary for development will be forthcoming from

15 private sources. An increase in the price of gold would also make

the likelihood of development greater.

Page 56: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

40

There has been a minimal amount of silver production as a by-product

of gold mining. The value of this metal produced since 1931 is only

about $120,000. Future silver production probably rests upon the <level-

opment of some of the lead and silver bearing galena lodes that occur

at widely scattered localities on the Seward Peninsula.16

If these

lodes were to be developed, it would be primarily for their lead content;

however, there is no known or anticipated activity in commercial lead

production in the area.

About $3.3 million worth of tin has been shipped from the Peninsula

in this century, most of it produced by small-scale placer mining at

Tin City and Lost River. The placer operations are relatively inactive

at present while interest is focussed on lode tin at Serpentine Hot

Springs and Tin City. Although the known tin resources are not large

they constitute the only known deposits of significance in the United

17 States. If fluorite and beryllium deposits in the Lost River area

are developed, the predicted Lost River tin ore reserves of 510,000 tons

containing 1.5 percent of tin may be confirmed and possibly expanded.18

Tin claims on Rumbolt Creek, 125 miles due north of Nome near Serpentine

Hot Springs, were explored during 1970 and 1971. These are believed to

be an extension of the lode tin deposits at Lost River which would make

19 them the fourth known tin lode in the world.

Lead, zinc, and copper production do not appear commercially pro-

fitable at this time. Small amounts of these ores have been recovered

in the past as a by-product of gold mining. Barring a breakthrough in

the technological processes of placer mining, the production of these

ores will wait for very heigh market prices to begin production. The

Page 57: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

41

preparations being made to start fluorite operations at Lost River make

the future of mining look brighter than it has been for several decades

on the Seward Peninsula.

Kobuk Valley

The center of economic interest in the Kobuk Valley since 1956

has been Bornite, 150 miles east of Kotzebue, where the Kennecott Copper

Corporation is exploring copper deposits. For several years these were

the only large-scale mining explorations being conducted in Alaska and

commencement of production was eagerly anticipated. Then the underground

workings flooded in 1966 and for a time it was feared that Kennecott would

discontinue their effort. The company has resumed exploration work but

seems no closer to setting a date for beginning production than it was

a decade ago.

The last report on the inferred reserves at Bornite was published

over nine years ago when an estimate of more than 100 million tons of

ore containing 1.2 to 1.6 percent of copper was reported.20

The Bureau

of Mines is estimating at this time 500 million tons of reserves for the

21 area containing over one percent of copper.

Kennecott has remained very secretive about its findings and in­

tentions. The company has not indicated any institutional, logistical

or technical obstacles beyond the expected transportation problems and

the occurrence of excessive underground water in some areas.

Various state and federal agencies have tried to elicit a commitment

for starting operations from Kennecott without success. Building a rail­

way or a highway, dredging the Kobuk River, and flying the ore out by

Page 58: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

42

Lockheed CSA or Boeing 747F have all been proposed without stirring any

particular response from Kennecott.

The last probable production figures that were furnished for

Bornite was 5,000 tons per day which would yield a yearly tonnage of

115,000 tons of concentrate, or a daily shipment of 315 tons from the

mine.22

It is expected that the mine will employ from 200 to 500 persons

with an equal number in supporting jobs. 23 A town of up to 5,000 people

could eventually result if all employees lived at the mine site. The

unemployment problems of the Kobuk Valley would be largely solved if

Kennecott's present program of local hire is continued.

The company presently employs from 30 to 50 men in their exploration

activities in the summer. Almost all of the laborers are from the Kobuk

Valley. Several local men have become experienced miners and are working

at other locations throughout Alaska.

Conditions in the world copper market will eventually mean that the

commercial production of Bornite copper will be competitive. Whether

this is within five, twenty or fifty years is at present a matter of

surmise. The recent expropriations of American copper interests in

Chile may prove to be a stimulus to production in the United States

and at Bornite in particular.

There are large asbestos deposits near the village of Kobuk. These

consist of tremolite and minor chrysolite erratically distributed in

serpentine along a belt about 45 miles long. The asbestos occurs in

podlike veins that are of great purity but weak tenacity. Some pro­

duction occurred from these deposits between 1943 and 1945 under the

stimulus of high wartime prices. The asbestos resources of the Kobuk

Page 59: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

43

Valley have not been adequately measured but the limited thickness and

extent of the serpentine bodies that normally enclose the mineral make

it unlikely that more deposits of major importance will be found in the

24 future.

Jade of neophrite variety and of gem quality occurs in various

places throughout the asbestos-bearing region. Both the jade and as-

bestos have been mined by the Eskimos for several centuries. There

has been continued small-scale mining of jade and some attempts to

establish a local jewelry industry that would utilize the jade as the

basis for jewelry and objets d'art with an Eskimo motif. Several

Eskimos were sent to Mexico after World War II to learn the jade work­

ing and silversmith crafts in the Spratling factory at Taxco. However,

the experiment did not succeed and at present jade recovery and process­

ing provide only a couple of jobs within the region.25

Gold mining in the Kobuk Valley has been limited to a few small

placer workings and has never attained a position of importance. It

still employs a few local people on a sporadic basis but it is unlikely

that it will ever be an important economic activity in itself.

North Slope

Besides the petroleum deposits for which the North Slope has become

world famous (see Oil and Gas), the only mineral resources which the

North Slope has in abundance are coal and phosphates. No metalliferous

lode deposits have been confirmed in the area at all.

The North Slope has over 92 percent of the presently known coal

resources of Alaska. Almost one-half of the entire area of 77,000 square

Page 60: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

44

miles is underlain with an estimated total of 19,292.2 million tons

of bituminous and 100,905.3 of subbituminous and lignite coals. Generally,

the area from Cape Lisburne eastward to the Colville River and north to

Peard Bay is almost totally underlain with coal. Roughly half the coal-

bearing area falls within Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4. The surface

outcroppings in the vicinity of Wainwright and at Cape Corwin have been

mined by Eskimos as long as can be remembered. Early explorers, whalers,

and traders utilized the resource extensively.

Detailed investigations by the Morgan Coal Company began in the

Kukpowruk River coal field in the early 1950's. Previously, the Geolo-

26 gical Survey had conducted some surface surveys. In the period 1961-

63 the Union Carbide and Ore Company and the U.S. Bureau of Mines also

sampled these coal beds for coking analyses. The Geological Survey

returned to the area for field investigations in 1966-67.27

The Kuk-

powruk River region has attracted the most interest due to the large

areas of coking coal found there. I

In the Utukok-Corwin region it is estimated that coal beds having

coking characteristics underlie approximately 1,200 square miles. The

total coal thickness averages about 50 feet, and lies in layered beds

of 2-1/2 to 20 feet per layer. The Morgan Coal Company holds an active

lease in the area. Applications for prospecting permits covering large

areas are pending before the Bureau of Land Management.

There are several major deterrents to the development of Alaska's

northern coal fields. Foremost are the legal restrictions, namely

Native land claims withdrawals and present federal withdrawals (pri-

marily Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4). The other deterrents are

Page 61: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

45

possible environmental restrictions on' large-scale strip mining and

development and operating costs.

It has been estimated that an investment of $50 million in mining

equipment and transportation systems will be necessary before a ton of

coal can be moved from the northern fields.28

This estimate was made

for the area immediately adjacent to the coast, with the least trans-

port costs. The first producer must solve problems such as moving

the coal from mine to tidewater in a roadless area, plus the develop-

ment of a suitable port and loading techniques. Mining itself may

prove a major problem in a permafrost area. Only an enormous demand

would justify the necessary outlays.

The only potential market of such magnitude at this time is Japan,

which requires a minimum of 40 million tons of coking coal annually·to

meet the demands of her steel industry. In 1969, the Japanese imported

85 percent of its requirements from the United States, Australia, and

29 Canada. Only a cost-competitive extraction and transportation system

would make it attractive to the Japanese to switch to North Slope coal

sources. Hard coking coal was selling in Japan at $18.00-$20.90 per

ton from the U.S. and $15.00-$17.50 from Australia in 1969. 30 Tussing

estimated in 1968 that Alaskan coal could not exceed $9.00 per ton at

tidewater in Alaska to be competitive with other sources by the time

31 transport costs were added on.

There are large phosphate resources in the eastern sections of the

Arctic Slope. Since U.S. reserves are 1,000 times present production,

it is not economically feasible now or in the foreseeable future to

develop these ores for the domestic market. The foreign market does

not appear any more promising at this time.

Page 62: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

..

BAP.R:OW

-~

/ .. ··············- .. ~~~~L •91NJ-LAY ' . PETROLEUM ..

.· l ': ,-,,, I COAL 1"1EL.OS ;_ \

..... / RESERVE _./ ) r· .. . ·····- ··············· ······ .... · ,,,~- ....... - ... _, ___ ,, No.4 ,,.--............. "'

', I -\...... I

', I ', I

',I ~

.BORN!Te'.

.KOBUK

Figure 11-3

. --' ..... """ \~

( • ( ARCTIC

\ \..<•~< NATIONAL \ I - I I

I \ t, WILDLIFE I

I \_ \ RANGE \ 4sus1E .... \ '-'\,_ ,

I \. ,---:_-I '\ -..., ,, __ ,, I '\ I

I ·,-,, ~ ;:?I Po·~.---- ~ o I ss1e1.c: GAs --. d' I l.//vc: Ro4rc: • :, . I 0, \ ..,I -I . ~, -:., ~,

' :-. ~, <::.:-. "',

\

' ' \ \ \

I I

\ I I

Locator Hap for Potential and Existing Hining and Oil Development in Northwest Alaska

.... ,..,:: ..

·-

.c­

°'

Page 63: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

47

Oil and Gas

At the present, known oil and gas reserves for Northwest Alaska

are confined to the North Slope. While there are definite expectations

of offshore finds in the Chukchi and Bering Seas, only preliminary ex­

ploration has taken place at this time.

Oil and gas seepages in Arctic Alaska were discovered by early

explorers and traders. These reports were confirmed by the Geological

Survey in the region in 1901.32

As a result of preliminary surveys,

President Harding established Naval Petroleum Reserve No. 4 (NPR No. 4)

in 1923. In 1943, a field party led by U.S. Bureau of Mines personnel

thoroughly reconnoitered northern Alaska. They confirmed oil seepages

at Dease Inlet, Cape Simpson, Ungoon Point, and Barter Island along

the coast, and also confirmed inland seepages at Umiat Mountain and on

the Kukpowruk River north of White Mountain.

The first oil exploration in the Arctic began in NPR No. 4 under

the auspices of the U.S. Navy in 1944. 33 Subsequently the Navy under­

took a ten-year program during which time 36 test wells and 44 core

tests were drilled. Three oil fields and six gas wells were discovered

within the Reserve's more than 23 million acres. The three oil fields,

Umiat, Cape Simpson and Fish Creek, were shut in after discovery and

not developed. Estimates of reserves for the Umiat field range from

3 to 70 million barrels of recoverable oil. Reserves at Cape Simpson

are estimated at 12 million and at Fish Creek 5 million barrels of

heavy oil.

Only one of the six gas fields discovered during the Navy explora­

tions is in production. This is in the South Barrow gas field located

Page 64: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

48

about five miles south of the village of Barrow. The Navy has used this

field since 1949 to supply its energy needs first at its Barrow explora­

tion base and later at the Naval Arctic Research Laboratory. In 1964,

Congress authorized the sale of gas to the residents of Barrow village.

At present there are five wells capable of producing gas for consumption

at Barrow. The Navy has estimated that the remaining reserves at Barrow

are 13 million MCF (thousand cubic feet) of gas. Cumulative production

to the end of 1969 was 4.4 million MCF. 34

The Navy exploratory drilling program in NPR No. 4 was limited to

the shallow Cretaceous zones and did not investigate the deeper zones

in which the later Prudhoe discoveries were found. 35 The Cabinet Task

Force on Oil Import Control in its 1970 report extrapolated from reports

on findings in Prudhoe Bay and the geology of Naval Petroleum Reserve

No. 4 to make predictions of between 4 and 25 billion barrels of re­

coverable reserves in NPR No. 4. 36

In the decade following the Navy's discoveries, private oil com­

panies paid little attention to the North Slope. Between 1953 and 1963

several oil companies sent field geologists into the north of the Brooks

Range. However, during this period most geologically promising acreage

was unavailable for leasing. In the 1920' s, 25 million acres of the

lands east of NPR No. 4 had been withdrawn by the federal government;

but in 1958, the lands between the Colville and Canning Rivers were

opened to exploration. The creation of the National Arctic Wildlife

Range in 1958 has kept the area east of the Canning River closed.

Exploratory activity recommenced in earnest in 1963 and eventually

led to the discoveries at Prudhoe Bay. First the drillers struck gas,

Page 65: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

49

but in unexciting quantities; then they drilled one dry hole after another.

Expectations on the North Slope reached a low ebb when Atlantic-Richfield

37 drilled to 13,517 feet without a show of oil or gas.

Atlantic-Richfield's next attempt was at Prudhoe Bay and the historic

first well came in during March of 1968. A confirmation well was drilled

seven miles away and when it was completed in July of 1968, ARCO announced

that the wells had struck oil. The news set off an explosion of explora­

tion between the Colville and the Canning that lasted until October 1969.

At the beginning of the 1969 oil rush 15 major oil companies and 31

other individuals and consortiums held around 5 million acres under lease

on the North Slope38 (or about bne-fifth of the total area with petroleum

potential). Native protests caused the suspension of federal leases, but

did not affect state mineral leases. Therefore, drilling was concentrated

in the Prudhoe area but substantial wildcatting was continued in the foot-

hills region.

At the peak of activity there were 24 rigs in operation on the North

Slope. Eight major all-year airstrips were constructed at minimum cost

of $1 million each. In May of 1969, 43 airstrips were in operation

supplying either drilling, seismic, or other exploratory efforts.

Peak employment was estimated at over 4,000 men counting two crews

on rotation on and off the Slope to make a full working crew of 2,800.

Average monthly employment in statewide petroleum industry mining rose

from 1,603 in 1967 to 2,153 in 1968 and peaked in 1969 at 3,220 dropping

to 2,649 in 1970. 39 All of the employment increase was due to North

Slope activity increase since Cook Inlet oil field employment was de-

clining.

Page 66: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

50

After the $900 million State lease sale in September of 1969, ex­

ploration activity steadily declined. Development drilling also slowed,

from 86 wells spudded in 1968, to 67 in 1969, 48 in 1970 and 20 in 1971.

The slowdown reflects industry's uncertainty over the timely provision

of a pipeline delivery system for the oil they tap.

The near-term future of the North Slope oil province falls into

two phases, development of the three known pools at Prudhoe and the con­

tinued exploration of the rest of the province. These two phases will

undoubtedly overlap to some degree.

Development of Prudhoe Bay Field

About 120 wells and 19 multiple well pads will be required to meet

initial delivery requirements from the Prudhoe field to the pipeline.

A large part of the material necessary for this stage is already on

hand at Prudhoe and it is estimated that about 20,000 tons of additional

material will be required to complete the gathering lines from the pads

and perhaps another 20,000 tons to complete the initial development

40 well complex.

The final complex at Prudhoe will require about 80 additional pads

with an average of six wells being drilled from each pad. No firm es­

timates have been made of the amount of material required to complete

the Prudhoe unit. Since a good deal of the equipment used to build

the first stage can be utilized in the second, it is probable that the

bulk of further imported materials will be material directly required

for wells and gathering lines. An estimate between 150,000 and 200,000

tons appears reasonable for the needs of this stage.

Page 67: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

51

Once development of the Prudhoe unit is complete it is unlikely

that there will be a need for major cargo flows. Diesel oil and

natural gas will be supplied from the field itself. The main cargo

requirement will be gasoline and jet fuel for the automotive equipment

and aircraft in the area. The work force of 250 to 400 men will not

generate major requirements since it is not contemplated that family

quarters will be provided at Prudhoe for oil company employees. The

continuing needs of the Prudhoe unit itself will probably be under

41 10,000 tons per year.

Exploring North Slope Province

Onshore

The total area of the North Slope is about 77,000 square miles,

of which around 53,000 square miles is prime area for petroleum explora­

tion. Of the prime area about 35,000 square miles is either in NPR No. 4

or in the Arctic National Wildlife Range, and thus is not available for

leasing or exploration without further action by Congress.

Of the remaining 18,000 square miles about 2,000 has been explored

for gas or oil by drilling. There have been a total of 60 wildcat wells

drilled exclusive of those in the NPR No. 4 program.

There can be little doubt that exploration will be carried out

over the major part of this area unless the proposed pipeline is not

built and a good alternative transportation cannot be found. In addition

to the three pools proven at Prudhoe (Lisburne, Sadlerochit, and Kuparuk

River), there are two shut-in oil wells just west of the Prudhoe field

limits. Whether these will constitute a new field or another pool in

Page 68: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

52

the Prudhoe field is not yet known because the drilling infonnation

has not been released.

There is another promising structure just to the east of Prudhoe

in the vicinity of Mikkelsen Bay and even better possibilities further

42 east just offshore from the Arctic National Wildlife Range. In any

case, large oil fields such as Prudhoe have never before existed in

isolation, Tussing in the Alaska Pipeline Report listed five reasons

why the present northern Alaska reserves of 9.6 billion barrels estimated

by the American Petroleum Institute should ultimately prove much larger:

1. As Prudhoe Bay field development nears com­pletion, the proved reserve estimates will rise.

2. Large petroleum accumulations of the Prudhoe Bay variety have never been known to exist in isolation. They are typically associated with a group of smaller accumulations.

3. Exploration activity on the Arctic slope has been directed as much by the administrative vagaries of land classification as by geolo­gical expertise; many areas with as much ii. priori favorability as that of the Prudhoe Bay field remain unleased.

4. Large structures of Prudhoe Bay magnitude are known to exist elsewhere in the province.

5. Firms with access to specialized geologic information and expertise have bid large sums for undrilled tracts far from existing discoveries, indicating they believe that further discoveries are extremely likely.43

A dry gas well on the Kavik River is the only substantial find in

the eastern foothills of the Brooks Range thus far, but the area has

been only lightly explored in comparison to the coastal areas. It is

the general consensus that further significant finds will be made in

the central section of the North Slope coastal area, but the foothills

Page 69: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

53

still retain the promise that made them the initial prime area for

wildcatting from 1963 to 1967.

The areas west of NPR No. 4, especially in the vicinity of Point

Lay, are considered to have high petroleum potential. There was ex-

tensive seismic exploration around Point Lay in the spring of 1970, the

results of which are still confidential. There has been no drilling

activity in the area because of land withdrawals.

Material Requirements

Exploring the rest of the available North Slope potential oil

acreage at the same level of intensity as the companies explored near

Prudhoe would require another 480 wildcat wells. However, as geologic

knowledge is increased, the need for wildcatting in some areas will

probably be lessened. No estimates have been made as to the number

of wildcat wells required to explore adequately the area at this

time, though a ballpark range of between 250 and 400 seems likely.

About 5,500 tons of freight are required for one wildcat operation

when drill rig, camp, and all other material must be brought to the

44 site. Additional drillings that can use the same rig and camp

location require only about 1,500 tons of additional cargo. The 60

wildcat operations between 1964 and 1971 required around 300,000 tons

45 of air and barge cargo for support.

It seems probable that between 1 million and 1. 5 million tons of

cargo will suffice for the future exploration needs of the area between

the Colville and Canning Rivers and that portion of the North Slope

west of NPR No. 4. If diesel and fuel oil is furnished to the Colville-

Page 70: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

54

Canning area from the refinery at Pru<lhoe, the cargo totals can pro-

bably be cut by one-third.

The rate at which the 1-1.5 million tons will be needed will de-

pend on the pace of exploration. This pace will be dictated by several

factors, among them being: (1) the number of new entrants who succeed

in securing North Slope leases when the land is opened to exploration

and development; (2) the possibility of securing oil transportation

capacity in addition to that offered by the presently projected pipe­

line; (3) the amount of exploration budget allocated to the North Slope

by existing lessees; and (4) the demand for Alaska oil in domestic and

possibly foreign markets. With so many variables, the exploration

period could fit any time frame from 5 to 20 years.

Offshore

The offshore areas in the Chukchi Sea are considered especially

promising. It is probable that the historically high discovery rate

in offshore oil drilling will obtain along the Arctic Coast as it has

in other areas. The offshore success rate off the coasts of Louisiana

and Texas was 41 percent during the early years of offshore exploration

in the middle 1950's, and in 1957 the success rate for both the Gulf

and Pacific coasts was 44 percent. 46

It is evident that in ice-free waters the high success rate coupled

with a higher chance of locating a giant field reduced average discovery

costs well below those of onshore ventures. However, the technology

for offshore drilling in areas of heavy sea ice has not been developed

and may not come easily. It is not only the problem of building a

Page 71: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

55

platform that will withstand severe ice stress that must be conquered,

but also the problem of protecting underwater pipeline systems from

ice scour in the shallow reaches of the Chukchi and Beaufort seas.

Drilling in very shallow waters may be possible from "captured"

ice islands that are grounded and then built up with ice so that they

remain stationary. Dredging from drilling islands is another feasible

solution. If drilling islands are placed so that they protect the

pipeline systems that link them to their gathering systems from in­

trusions by heavy ice floes, the problem of bottom scour could be

largely eliminated.

Unless national energy needs become acute it seems likely that

offshore developments in the Arctic will follow after the most promising

onshore areas are explored and developed. This would place any major

offshore efforts into the decade of the 1980's or later.

Development of Naval Petroleum Reserve Number .Four

NPR No. 4 has never served as a true strategic military reserve

since its oil would not be available in a timely manner in a national

emergency. The reserve was originally created to insure the Navy a

future supply of oil and the strategic limitations of a reserve in the

Arctic appear to have been ignored. The Navy is now considering other

ways to meet its national security requirements.

The building of a major pipeline to the Prudhoe Bay field will

provide the Navy with a way to get its oil out of the Arctic. In order

to find out whether NPR No. 4 is actually big enough to make large-scale

reshuffling worthwhile, the navy would have to initiate a new development

Page 72: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

56

program to drill <leeper test we.Lls and determJne just how much oil

there is in the deeper layers of the reserve. If significant amounts

47 of oil are found, three alternatives present themselves.

First, the Navy oil wells could be shut in and arrangements made

to take over the pipeline on a standby system. This alternative would

not necessarily provide increased production to the nation in time of

war or emergency if the pipeline were already carrying a capacity load

of private oil. In addition, the Navy would have to leave equipment

and other capital immobilized in the standby status of NPR No. 4.

Another disadvantage is the possible· loss of oil through migration to

any fields developed along the borders of NPR No. 4. The only strate-

gic advantage would be in determining what reserves were available.

A second alternative is for the Navy to lease certain sections

of the reserve to private oil companies who already possess reserve

capacity in other states. If the companies find oil in NPR No. 4.,

then production from the northern field could be traded for an equiv-

alent reserve in a proven field in the south which would be shut in

as a more strategic reserve. Adjustments would be made based on the

wellhead price for each field. This plan would have the advantage of

providing extra capacity through existing pipelines in an emergency

without the great delivery system costs necessary to provide standby

capacity to NPR No. 4.

A third alternative is for the Navy to use a portion of the

throughput of the pipeline from Prudhoe Bay and move oil from NPR

No. 4 to another part of the U.S. where it could be stored in salt

domes easily accessible to the national pipeline grid. This alternative

Page 73: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

57

may be cheaper than the maintenance of import quotas but is probably

more expensive than the shut-in petroleum reserves because the Navy

must: (1) purchase oil for storage in the current market rather than

at a discounted present value from some future production date; (2) pay

a lifting cost; (3) pay to transport the oil to the site of the salt

dome; and (4) bear the cost of pumping the oil back into the ground

48 for storage.

In discussing these alternatives in an unpublished paper, Meade

and Sorenson found that maximum production of domestic oil is strate­

gically unsound. Their major objection to import quotas as a means

of promoting national security is that they "sacrifice future national

security in order to obtain a higher degree of self-sufficiency in the

49 immediate period."

The cost of maintaining an oil reserve in a ready standby condition

has been computed by Meade at 8.4 cents per barrel per year for a domes­

tic petroleum reserve. He computes the social costs of oil import

quotas at $1.04 per barrel of additional domestic production. 50 Thus,

in situ holding of oil appears to provide the greatest long-run security

to the nation at the least social cost. Since alternative two would

provide increased production in time of emergency at no extra cost,

then it would appear to be the most favorable solution to the problem

of NPR No. 4 for the Navy. The oil industry would also benefit from

alternative two because the increased volumes of oil travelling through

the pipeline would reduce the cost of the pipeline per barrel of oil.

A further advantage would be that a pipeline grid serving develop­

ment on the entire North Slope could be developed, a prospect that is

Page 74: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

58

not likely as long as NPR No. 4 remains inviolable. This would make

unnecessary the building of a fleet of specially ice-stressed tankers

to serve the areas north of the Bering Straits.

Complete exploration of the reserve could require up to 500 wild­

cat drilling operations and an input of around 2 million tons of cargo

to the area. Any major .field developments would require tonnages sim­

ilar to those necessary at Prudhoe or about 500,000 tons for a giant

field.51

The absence of gravel in the greater part of NPR No. 4 would

make it necessary to provide some substitute for the drilling pads used

in the Prudhoe Bay area. Platforms on pilings seem to be the most fea­

sible answer at this time. This would raise the carg0 requirements sub­

stantially for this area. Additional needs will be generated by pipeline

spurs to connect to the main line at Prudhoe Bay.

Gas Line Developments

Construction is expected to begin on a natural gas line to Prudhoe

Bay four to five-and-a-half years after the trans-Alaska oil pipeline

is begun. This would mean that the gas line would be available one or

two years after the oil pipeline was completed. The assumption is made

that maximum oil production at Prudhoe Bay will produce enough casing­

head gas to reinject for field pressure maintenance and to send through

the gas line.

Plans for the gas line envision a capacity of 2.5 billion thousand

cubic feet (MCF) per day with the capability of being expanded to 4

billion MCF per day. Alternatives advanced for maintaining supply

when casinghead gas is not available for any reason include a ready

Page 75: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

59

"2 supply of dry gas or stored excess gas kept in depleted reservoirs.J

The contractors constructing the gas line will be able to utilize

many of the existing facilities on the North Slope so their freight

requirements will be largely limited to the pipe itself, gathering

facilities, and support for the construction crews. Based on the

tonnages of the oil pipe shipments, a requirement for about 200,000

to 250 ,000 tons appears likely. This would be for a line to Prudhoe

Bay only.

The State of Alaska prohibits unnecessary flaring of natural gas,

so it will be necessary to tie every oil development into the gas pipe-

line grid. If not, then the gas may be reinjected or converted to

liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Provision of transportation to any oil and gas production along

the Chukchi Sea coast will require the closest examination of alterna-

tives. A pipeline from Point Lay to Prudhoe Bay would be almost 350

miles in length. Unless there were intervening fields along the way

with which to amortize the costs, it is most likely that it would be

much cheaper to provide a tanker fleet and solve the gas problem by

the cheapest of the available alternatives. The tanker solution would

have the added advantage of not having to wait for available throughput

capacity in the main pipeline from Prudhoe.

The above assumptions are based upon the existence of only one

major oil pipeline and one major gas line from the North Slope to the

south. Opposition of conservationists will be likely to limit oil and

gas delivery systems to one pipeline for each. However, a major energy

crisis and the presence of extremely vast reserves in the Arctic could

Page 76: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

60

change this picture and make imperative the provision of several de­

livery systems.

The following table showing low and high estimates of cargo flows

based on oil and gas development is based on the assumptions found in

the preceding projections. With so many variables, it is impossible

to offer these projections as anything other than an educated guess

of what the future may bring. The estimates of cargo flow presume

that NPR No. 4 is explored by either the Navy or the oil industry

under agreement with the Navy sometime in the next two decades, and

that only one major oil and one major gas line will be built to the

south, It should be noted that even with this most optimistic outlook

for oil and gas development, the annual inbound cargo requirements

would still be small compared to major cargo flows elsewhere.

A policy of restricted leasing in order to control exploration

would tend to even out cargo requirements, but some degree of erraticism

will probably continue.

Fisheries and Aquatic Animals

The fisheries resources of the llorthwest are limited in potential

and, with one exception, attempts to establish a fish processing indus­

try have failed. High operating costs, erratic catch levels, under­

capitalization, and high transportation rates have been the reasons

for failure. Despite their lack of commercial potential, the North­

west fisheries are adequate for subsistence fishing and hunting.

Page 77: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Table II-14

Potential One-Time Inbound Cargo Flows to Support Onshore Oil and Gas Development in Northwest Alaska

Central Area Western Area of North SloEe NPR No. 4 of North SloEe Total Low High Low High Low High Low High Est. Est. Est. Est. Est. Est. Est. Est.

(1,000 tons)

Prudhoe Bay Oil Field Development 190 240 190 ~40

Pipeline Construction 50 100 100 100 50 300

Gas Line Construction 200 250 100 100 200 450

Exploration 1,000 1,500 1,250 2,000 250 400 2,500 3,900

Other Field °' Development 1,000 soo soo 2,oou .....

---Total 1,440 3,090 1,250 2,700 2SO 1,100 2,940 6,E90

Annual Average 10-Year Development 144 309 12S 270 2S 110 294 689

20-Year Development 72 1S4. s 62.S 13S 12. s SS 147 344.5

Potential Contunuing Annual Cargo Flows 10 30 10 10 10 50

Source: Walter B. Parker's calculations.

Page 78: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

62

Norton Sound

Norton Sound is the best fishery in the Northwest, and is rich in

fish species if not in numbers. There are king, pink, silver, and

chum salmon, herring, many varieties of demersals, king crab, and

shrimp in the marine environment, besides large resident populations

of seals and beluga whales. In the rivers, besides the salmon, dolly

varden, whitefish, and herring are plentiful.

The Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska

estimated that if a fishery could be developed it might return between

$447,000 and $738,000 in 1968 prices to the local economy (see Table

11-15). The lessening reliance upon fish for dog food with the advent

of snow machines makes this fishery even more possible now.53

There have been several attempts to market Norton Sound fisheries

products in the past decade. Many have relied upon air transportation

with little success. The problem has not only been one of high costs

but of maintaining product quality during transshipment at Nome and

in Anchorage. The volume of business has not make it worthwhile to

establish the necessary freezer and cold room facilities necessary to

market either a frozen or truly fresh product.

A combination of local ownership through a cooperative and the

availability of centralized freezer facilities could encourage the

development of this fishery resource. A joint facility for processing

reindeer and fish products has been suggested to operate in conjunction

with the joint city-state reindeer slaughterhouse now existing in Nome. 54

There have been no studies made on expanding the Norton Sound

fishery beyond its present riverine and close onshore range. As early

Page 79: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Species

1966 .Production

Chum Fishery

King Fishery

Pink Fishery

Coho Fishery

Total

1970 Estimate

Chum Fishery

King Fishery

Pink Fishery

Coho Fishery

Herring Fishery

Salmon Caviar

Other Species

Total

63

Table Il-15

Fisheries Production and Potential, Norton Sound Area

Number of Fish Value (FOB Norton Sound)

Level:

560,000 $ 54,000

31,000 6,200

38,000 3,000

40,000 4,800

$ 68,000

600,000 - 1,000,000 $180,000 - $300,000

50,000 - 70,000 25,000 - 35,000

200,000 - 400,000 20,000 - 40,000

100,000 - 200,000 40,000 - 80,000

500,000 - 1,000,000 35,000 - 70,000

57,000 - 93,000

300,000 - 400,000 90,000 - 120,000

$447,000 $738,000

Long Run Additions

Bottom Fish 300,000 - 600,000 $ 15,000 - $ 30,000

Total $462,000 - $768,000

Source: United States Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, Subregional Economic Analysis of Alaska, Anchorage, 1968.

Page 80: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

64

as 1948 king crab and shrimp were taken in encouraging numbers near

Nome by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (now the Bureau of Sport

Fisheries and Wildlife). 55 Little more information exists now as to

the extent of high value stocks farther offshore.

Kotzebue Sound and Its Associated River Systems

The Kotzebue area fisheries have extremely limited potential but

form an important segment of the present economic base for the region.

The formation of the Kotzebue Sound Area Fisheries Cooperative in 1968

has brought higher incomes to the local fishermen and brought about a

better utilization to the catch (see Table 11-16). The co-op is

operating a modern freezing and processing plant.

The most important fish run in the area is chum salmon (the least

valuable of the salmonids). Arctic char (dolly varden), sheefish and

whitefish are important. Some of the finest grayling, in terms of size

and overall sport fish quality in Alaska, inhabit the Kobuk and Noatak

River systems. Beluga whale and seal inhabit Kotzebue Sound. Some

small-scale expansion of the fishery may be possible through utiliza­

tion of other species and wintertime fishing of inland waters.

Northwest and Arctic Coasts

Whale, seal, and walrus hunting are important to the coastal villages

from Kotzebue to Barrow. Whale hunting especially retains great social

and psychological importance in the village culture. The bowhead whale

migrates through the Bering Strait as soon as ice conditions permit,

and during whale hunting all other daily activity stops.

Page 81: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Year

1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 19683

Notes: 1)

2)

Table II-16

Dollar Value Estimates of Kotzebue District Commercial Fishery, 1962-1968

Gross Value of Catch to Fishermen

$45,500.00 9' 140. 00

34,660.00 18' 000.00 25,000.00 28,700.00 46,000.00

$

Wages1 Earned

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

15,000.00 11,000.0o+

Total Income to District

$ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

43,700.00 57,000.00+

Wholesale Value of Pack2

$304,500.00 113,316.00 158,020.00 83,294.00 84,630.00

100,450.00 62,000.00

Includes wages paid to tender boat operators, processing plant employees in district.

Based on type of processing when fish were shipped out of the district.

3) First year of operation for Kotzebue Sound Area Fisheries Cooperative.

Source: 1968 Annual Report, Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Area, Alaska, Department of Fish and Game, p. 108.

=' i,...;

Page 82: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

66

Walrus ivory, baleen from whales, and animal skins form the basic

materials for the Native handicrafts which constitute home industry for

Northwest Alaska. For some families the income from their ivory carving,

skinwork, or other art form may be the only source of independent cash

income.

Seal hunting remains the basis of the Eskimo subsistence economy.

The phasing out of dog teams by snow machines means the total meat

requirement of some families will decrease by as much as two-thirds.

Ardent hunters tend to retain dogs in order to have an excuse to hunt

and also to retain the old ways intact.

Whitefish is the major fish food for Barrow and most of the other

villages along these coasts. Arctic char, smelt, grayling, and some

salmon are also taken, as are the tomcod. Little is known of the

fisheries of the rivers emptying into the Arctic Ocean, but a number

of whitefish and char have been taken intermittently from the Colville

throughout the years.

The fisheries and other marine resources of the Arctic Ocean are

also largely unknown. The Japanese took 92 tons of chum salmon in the

Chukchi Sea with one vessel in a two-month period in 1966. Little is

known about further Japanese or Soviet efforts north of the Bering

S . 56 traits.

Any major effort to utilize the pelagic stocks of Norton Sound

and the ocean areas to the north would more likely be made by an open

ocean fishing fleet rather than coastal fishing boats and thus would

have little effect upon the regional economy.

Page 83: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

67

In all, there is little likelihood that a commercial fishery of

any magnitude can be maintained on the living resources of the rivers

from Point Hope to the Canadian border.

Reindeer Husbandry

Commercial agriculture in Northwest Alaska is confined to the

reindeer industry. The history of the reindeer in Alaska, beginning

with its introduction in 1892, is tangled, controversial and for the

purposes of this study largely irrelevant. The most important fact

about the reindeer industry -- the meteoric rise in animal numbers

fr.om 1890-1930 and the equally rapid fall -- is shown in Figure ll-4.

Other important points are few: (1) the actual raising of large

numbers of reindeer is biologically-speaking relatively easy; but (2)

the current system of ownership and management of reindeer has not

been able to develop reindeer herding into a dependable growing source

of income to the Natives as intended; and (3) even if management were

improved and reindeer numbers grow, a market for reindeer meat outside

rural Alaska has not developed.

57 Total reindeer at present number around 30,000, up from an early

fifties low of less than 20,000. Two community herds produce reindeer

for subsistence, two governn1ent her~s are protected as wild reindeer,

and the remaining eleven herds are a combination of subsistence and

small commercial operations (see Table 11-17). Most reindeer herding

is done on the Seward Peninsula.

Production of reindeer meat has been relatively stable over the

past decade with most of it going to supply domestic markets in the

Page 84: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

700,000

600, 000

500,000

400,000

300 ,000

200,000

100,000

1890

68

Figure Il-4

Estimated Number of Reindeer by Years, Alaska, 1892 to 1965

r-' I \ I \ I ' I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

A~ I l... ' I \

I I I l

I \

II \ I \

;' \ I I \

I \ ,,.., ,.,J "'".;. _,,,,,, / \,,..,

1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960

Source: John D. Abraharason, Westward Alaska, The Native Economy and Its Resource Base, Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, Anchorage, 1968, p. 79.

Page 85: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

69

Table II-17

Individual Reindeer Herd Operations, 1948-68*

Estimated Herd Size Village or Region 1948 1958 1968

Golovin 1,542 5,231 5,000 Kiwalik 600 Kotzebue 2,600 Selawik-Smith/Gray 1,332 1,537 1,320 Shungnak 400 Barrow Village 600 Point Barrow 1,250 Cape Halkett 400 Teller 650 2,250 3,000 Candle 3,500 961 Deering 1,100 1,029 Cape Espenberg 1,562 2,086 Buckland 1,500 1,700 Selawik-Shelden 1,000 Selawik-Skin 1,800 Noorvik 900 Unalakleet 650 195 Noatak 1,097 Bervig Mission 600 Koyuk 480 Nome-Davies 500

Total 9,374 22,127 16,871

*Table does not include two government herds at Nunivak and Nome and two community herds at St. Lawrence and Stebbins.

Source: 1948: Charles Rouse, C.R. Montjoy, and D.M. Belcher, Reindeer Survey - 1948, made jointly by the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Alaska Native Service (July-September 1948), p. 1-16; 1958: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Annual Land Operations Report, 1958, p. 11-12; 1968: Herd estimates by BLM (data compiled and tabulated by Dean F. Olson, in Alaska Reindeer Herdsmen, ISEGR, University of Alaska, 1969, p. 70-73.

Page 86: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

70

villages and larger towns of western Alaska. Some by-products are

marketed hides as tourist items, as raw leather to manufacturers

and antlers to Korea and other parts of the Orient. Table 11-18

shows reindeer meat production in Alaska.

Year

Table Il-18

Reindeer Meat Production for All Alaska

Pounds (dressed weight) Dollar Value

1962-66 (average) 1967

552,540 614,900 739,000 569,800 602,800

215,000 257,000 324,000 269,900 294,688

1968 1969 1970

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture Statistical Reporting Service, Alaska Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, Alaska Agricul­tural Statistics, 1968-69-70 (annual series), cooperating with Alaska Division of Agriculture, Alaska Agricultural Experiment Station, Palmer, and Cooperative Extension Service, University of Alaska.

Private range allotments for reindeer totalled 10,133,584 acres

in 1968, and extended throughout the Seward Peninsula and the area be-

tween Kotzebue and Selawik. The range is under the control of the

Bureau of Land Management, but management has not been a problem in

recent years because the herds are so small.

Since statehood, the reindeer industry has received scrutiny as a

possible development focus for Northwest Alaska but little progress has

been made. Major roadblocks in the way include confusion over subsis-

tence versus commercial production goals; ownership and management

Page 87: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

71

personnel and techniques; an<l production techniques and marketing <irrangc~

men ts.

Traditionally reindeer have been slaughtered on the open range near

their home village during the winter months. The herd owner serves as

producer, processor, and wholesaler since he usually sells direct to his

destination retailer. Labor costs of rounding-up and slaughtering the

deer are usually paid in meat; thus, less than half of the carcasses

58 produce sales revenue for the owner.

Under a typical range slaughter operation, an owner may slaughter

600 deer from his herd of 2,000. Of this number some 330 may be used

up in camp meat and as payment for direct labor, leaving 270 carcasses

to be sold. Assuming a dressed weight of 150 pounds, a total of 40,500

pounds becomes available for sale. The deer are usually sold at 40 cents

per pound but freight and operating expenses usually take half this amount,

so the eventual profit to the owner is about $8,000 or $13. 33 per deer of

59 those slaughtered.

The range slaughter system serves as a means of redistribution of

wealth within the village and also provides the non-deer owners with a

source of meat for the winter. Any other system introduced, such as a

centralized slaughter house, will have to take this factor into account

and make allowances for it or risk upsetting the entire village economy

of the Seward Peninsula.

The State of Alaska has built a $60,000 slaughter house at Nome to

act as a central processing point for the reindeer of the Seward Peninsula.

The plant has not been able to begin operation to date because of adminis­

trative difficulties. In order to use the facility, the deer must be

Page 88: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

72

herded to Nome where they are to be sold on the basis of live weight, A

proposed price of 12-1/2 cents per pound is planned. Under this system

the herd of 600 reindeer would have a live weight of about 120,000 pounds

based on 200 pounds per deer. A gross of $15,000 would be received from

which must be paid operating, direct labor, and transportation expenses.

Since direct labor costs would be paid in cash now instead of meat, the

expenses for bringing 600 deer to market might be higher than the price

of slaughtering them on the open range. It does not seem probable that

the herder will wind up with any more in net profit than he receives

from the open range operation.

The main advantage of the slaughter house is that the meat would -·--·-·--------~--·-·--

receive federal and state certification for sale, thus opening the

way to an expanded market. The disadvantages are that the central

slaughtering procedure is inconvenient and less profitable for the

individual Native owners.

The Alaska State Division of Agriculture has a continuing research

program on market potential for reindeer products. They estimate that

a probable market exists for one million pounds of meat in Alaska pro-

vided that prices can be adjusted to make reindeer meat more competitive

with beef and more attractive processing can be achieved.

In 1930, 2.5 million pounds of meat were exported to the West

Coast from Alaska. Since the population of the West Coast has almost

tripled since that time, the consumer potential is still there. However,

meat distributors could be reluctant to venture into reindeer, even as

a speciality item, in a period when beef, chicken and other standard

meat products are having great difficulty in holding their market

Page 89: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

73

positions. ~1oreover, the reindeer's history of precipitous increaHe

and decline adds to the indecision over market expansion.

The advisability of increasing reindeer herds to the point where

they will compete with the caribou for range must be carefully studied.

During the 1930's, no one observed caribou migration, but it is thought

that the reindeer were beginning to drive them off the range. At

present, however, fears of overlarge reindeer herds seems premature

in light of the difficulties herders have experienced in trying to

expand herds at all.

Tourism and Recreation

Perhaps more than any area in the state, the Northwest presents

the opportunity for developing a year-round tourist industry. The

Northwest Region fits the tourist's conception of Alaska: it has

Eskimos, arctic vistas, and, in Nome, traces of the gold rush's most

famous boom town. A harsh climate turns into an asset ·for the tourist

who wants to experience the "real Arctic," Eskimo culture in winter,

i.e., dog sledding, ice fishing, etc., which is closer to tourist

expectations of Eskimo life than the fishing and seasonal work culture

of the summer months.

Tourism and recreation are at this time limited to three main

categories of visitors: (1) tourists taking air package tours on Wien

Consolidated or Alaska Airlines to Nome, Kotzebue, Barrow, and Prudhoe

Bay; (2) sportsmen who hunt marine animals along the coasts and on the

icepack, and hunt land animals in the Brooks Range; and, (3) a few

independent travellers who come by private plane or scheduled airline.

Page 90: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

74

The estimated 15,000 tourists who visited Northwest Alaska in

1971 were one of the prime generators of cash flows into the regional

60 economy. If their number can be increased and more especially if

their length of stay can be increased, touris1n can provide a firm base

for employment of several hundred people in the region. Tourists will

continue to travel by air, and will not directly affect waterborne com-

merce except as an indirect stimulus to purchase of equipment and

supplies.

In order to maximize the tourist attractions of Northwest Alaska,

a 1968 study recommended that Barrow, Kotzebue and Nome each develop

those attractions which are unique to itself and minimize duplication.61

In this way, tourists will be encouraged to visit each community in the

area and increase their total stay in the region.

The study suggested that Barrow should concentrate on dramatizing

the Eskimo's life to the tourist; Kotzebue should concentrate on the

hunting and fishing aspects of Eskimo life; while Nome's mining atmos-

62 phere should be further enhanced. Prudhoe Bay has since joined the

ranks of tourist attractions, and it is a showcase of Arctic oil <level-

opment.

Nome

The impact of tourism on Nome, as on the other communities, will

continue to be linked to the package tours furnished by Wien Consolidated

and Alaska Airlines. Alaska Airlines has made a major investment in Nome

and now operates all three of the modern hotels in the community, plus

the better restaurant facilities. Alaska's employment of as many as

Page 91: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

75

forty workers makes the airline a major Nome employer.

Tourism makes jobs for Nome's population and supplies a market

for Eskimo handicraft items which are a major source of income for

many residents. In fact, the limited supply has been exceeded by demand

and cheap imports are being sold in place of handmade items. Despite

the rush of business, large incomes do not accrue to the skin sewers

and ivory carvers of Nome; their incomes are limited by their production,

and it is the rare artist who can produce over $2,000 in work for the

year.

The airlines offer several tourist attractions for the tourist in

Nome tours of the adjacent gold workings and dredges, Eskimo dances,

and dog sled rides. However, little is done to extend the stay of the

traveller on the Seward Peninsula. Nearby attractions such as the Imuruk

lava beds, hot springs, and reindeer herds hold potential interest for

the tourist,

/ Kotzebue

Tourism in Kotzebue is limited by the number of overnight accom-

modations. The small number of lodgings available are not of the same

quality as those in Nome and need upgrading if Kotzebue is to secure a

share of the overnight tourist business.

In many ways, this community offers more than Nome or Barrow in

excursions for tourists interested in penetrating rural Alaska. River

boat trips on the Kobuk and Noatak have been offered but the main em-

phasis of these trips has been on sport fishing. Both rivers have

beautiful valleys and offer a unique wilderness experience with minimum

Page 92: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

76

exertion by the traveller. The Noatak Valley is virtually unpopulated

above the village of Naotak. The Kobuk River is lined with small villages

and old sites that offer a glimpse of the present and past woodland culture

of the Eskimos.

Kotzebue lists itself as the polar bear hunting capital of the world.

The community is headquarters for over one hundred hunters every spring,

each of whom stays from two days to two weeks. The influx of hunters

has brought a cash flow into the sluggish winter economy. However, as

polar bear hunting is restricted, this source of income will diminish.

Barrow

Barrow has appeal to visitors for three reasons: it is the northern­

most community in the United States and on the North American continent;

it is the largest Eskimo village in North America; and, it is the field

base for American arctic research.

New hotel facilities have been built at Barrow but the town is still

woefully deficient in accommodations. The Northwest Development Corpora­

tion has been trying to promote a new terminal building for the airport

which would form the nucleus for a complex designed to better serve

visitors. This project would be a joint federal/state/local/private

operation and has experienced some of the most involved coordinating in

the history of the state.

Tourists at Barrow have been generally restricted to the sights

immediately around the village with some tours to the Will Rogers-Wiley

Post monument. Dances and dog sled rides are staged here for tourists

as in Nome and Kotzebue.

Page 93: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

77

The Naval Arctic Research Laboratory at Point Barrow has a large

collection of arctic animals which is generally not available for public

viewing. The basis for a unique arctic zoo exists here, a facility which

would enhance the research aspects of the animal collection while making

it available to the public. However, no plans for such a zoo exist at

present.

Barrow is suited to be the site of an Eskimo cultural center similar

to centers operated elsewhere by the National Park Service. A cultural

center could provide the most comprehensive display possible of the

Arctic Eskimo (Inupik) way of life, past and present. The center would

preserve the rhythm of the hunting cycle throughout the year and climax

with the whaling festivals held in Barrow every spring. The current of

Eskimo life is still strong in Barrow, and a cultural center could be

integrated into village life as a living expression of the culture of

the Inupik-speaking peoples.

Prudhoe Bay

Wien Consolidated Airlines converted an oil company camp into a

visitors camp at Prudhoe Bay in the summer of 1971. Located at Deadhorse

Airport, it provides the first accommodations for the casual visitor to

this part of Alaska. It seems likely that the oil fields will continue

to have some attraction, especially if exploration and development

activity begins again.

Page 94: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

78

Footnotes

1. Miller B. Spangler, New Technology and Marine Resource Development, 1970, p. 222-23.

2. Henry C. Berg and Edward H. Cobb, Metalliferous Lode Deposits of Alaska, 1967, p. 108.

3. Frederick C. Lu, Lawrence C. Heiner and DeVerle P. Harris, Known and Potential Ore Reserves, Seward Peninsula, Alaska, 1968, p. 1.

4. Interview with Ron Sheardowne, Manager, Lost River Mining Company, at Lost River, August 26, 1971.

5. "Optimism Reigns at Lost River," Alaska Construction & Oil, Vol. 12 (9),p.24.

6. Ibid.

7. Sheardowne interview.

8. In an interview with Mrs. Edith Bullock of PAC Barge Lines on October 14, 1971, she stated that she believed that the land claims would make it more difficult to get the cheap labor which she had relied upon as the operator of the lightering service at Kotzebue, B & R Tug and Barge, and which Kennecott .had also relied upon. Mrs. Bullock did not believe that B & R could have operated and paid going Anchorage wage rates.

9. Lawrence E. Heiner and Ernest N. Wolff, Mineral Resources of Northern Alaska, 1968, p. 18.

10. Frederick C. Lu, op. cit., p. 20-21.

11. Tim Bradner, "Nome Plays the Wai ting Game," Alaska Construction & Oil, Vol. 10(5), May 1969, p. 25.

12. Miller B. Spangler, op. cit., p. 222.

13. Clark & Groff Engineers, Nomeport, A Preliminary Investigation of a Deepwater Harbor at Nome, Alaska, 1968.

14. Leonard L. Fischman, The Economic Potential of the i1ineral and Botanical Resources of the U.S. Continental Shelf and Slope, Springfield, Virginia, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, September 1968, p. 385-86.

15. Hiller B. Spangler, op. cit., p. 234.

16. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral and Water Resources of Alaska, 1964, p. 116.

Page 95: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

79

17. Lawrence E. Heiner, op. cit. , P· 18.

18. Frederick c. Lu, op. cit. , P· 32.

19. Tim Bradner, op. cit. , P· 18.

20. Mining World, February 1962, p. 21.

21. Federal Field Connnittee for Development Planning in Alaska, Economic Outlook for Alaska, 1971, p. 169.

22. Lawrence E. Heiner, op. cit., p. 20.

23. Federal Field Connnittee for Development Planning in Alaska, A Subregional Economic Analysis of Alaska, 1968, p. 340.

24. U.S. Geological Survey, Locatable Mineral Resources in Alaska, un­published report to the Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, Anchorage, March 1971.

25. Alaska State Housing Authority, Kotzebue, Alaska Comprehensive Development Plan, March 1971, p. 36.

26. R.M. Chapman and F.C. Sable, Geology of the Utukok-Corwin Region, Northwestern Alaska, 1960.

27. J.E. Callahan, Geology of T. lS, R. 441, Unsurveyed Umiat Principal Meridian, in the Kukpowruk Coal Field, Alaska, U.S.

28. Alexander A. Wanek, Coking Coal Potential in Alaska, February 1971.

29. Sumitomo Shoji Kaisha Ltd., Coking Coal Imported by Japanese Steel Industry, May 25, 1969.

30. Ibid.

31. Arlon R. Tussing, Salvatore Comitini, et. al., Alaska-Japan Economic Relations, ISEGR, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, 1968.

32. F.C. Schrader, A Reconnaissance in Northern Alaska, USGS Professional Paper No. 20, Washington, D. C. , 1904.

33. Donald P. Blasko, "Regional Economic Development Plan and Program for Alaska, Resource Fuels, Petroleum, Natural Gas, 11 U.S. Bureau of Mines, unpublished paper prepared for the Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, Anchorage Field Operation Center, February 1971, p. 16.

34. Ibid., p. 17-18.

Page 96: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

80

35. Walter J, Meade and Phlllip E. Sorenson, "A National Defense Petroleum Reserve Alternative to Oil Import Quotas," unpublished paper, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1971.

36. Cabinet Task Force on Oil Import Control, The Oil Import Question, Washington, D.C., February 1970, p. 306.

37. Donald P. Blasko, op. cit., p. 17.

38. Federal Aviation Agency, Alaska Plan for the Arctic Region, Anchorage, December 1969, p. 23 (information computed from Alaska Division of Oil and Gas records).

39. Alaska Department of Labor, Statistical Quarterly 1960-70, Juneau, 1971.

40. Information received from Homer Burrell, Director, Alaska Division of Oil and Gas, in an interview on September 10, 1971. This infdr­mation was submitted to the Division of Oil and Gas at the Prudhoe Bay field unitization hearings.

41. It has been stated several times by British Petroleum and Atlantic Richfield personnel that they expect the permanent operating force at Prudhoe Bay not to exceed 400 men. The major component on in­bound freight will be gasoline and jet fuel. Personnel support requirements are expected to be very small.

42. Information furnished by oil companies to the Federal Aviation Administration's North Slope working group in November 1968.

43. Arlan R. Tussing, George W. Rogers and Victor Fischer, Alaska Pipeline Report, ISEGR, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, 1971, p. 56.

44. Interview with Homer Burrell, September 9, 1971.

45. About 600,000 tons of freight was hauled to the North Slope for the oil companies by barge, winter road, and aircraft between 1963 and 1968. About half of this total was material for the pipeline and the permanent development at Prudhoe Bay.

46. Miller B. Spangler, .£11 · cit. , p. 156.

47. Walter J. Meade, op. cit.

48. Ibid. , p. 16.

49. Ibid. , p. 18.

so. Ibid, , p. 13-15.

Page 97: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

81

51. There have been about 300,000 tons hauled to Pru<lhoe thus fnr for field development and another 200,000 tons are estimated to be necessary to complete the unitization program.

52. Information received from the presentation by the Northwest Gas Study Group at the Alaska Legislature Pipeline Committee (Croft Committee hearings on September 29, 1971).

53. Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, op. cit.

54. Alaska Consultants, Nome Comprehensive Development Plan, Alaska State Housing Authority, Anchorage, 1968, p. 74.

55. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwestern Alaska, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1959, p. 36.

56. Phillip E. Chitwood, Japanese, Soviet, and South Korean Fisheries of Alaska, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Washington, D.C., January 1969, p. 15.

57. Alaska Consultants, op. cit., p. 68.

58. Ibid., p. 88.

59. Ibid., p. 88. Cost model is based on figures developed by Dean Olson for average production costs of reindeer meat.

60. Preliminary estimate obtained from Wien Consolidated Airlines and Alaska Airlines.

61. Cresap, McCormick and Paget, Management Consultants, A Program for Increasing the Contribution of Tourism to the Alaskan Economy, prepared for the Economic Development Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Travel Division, Department of Economic Development, State of Alaska, p. VII-38.

62. Ibid. , p. VII-41.

Page 98: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

CHAPTER III SPECIAL FACTORS IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Changes in Land Ownership

Alaska Native Fund Payments

Fonn of Government

Page 99: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

83

Changes in Land Ownership*

The great bulk of the land of Northwest Alaska is owned by the

federal government with the exception of lands that are tentatively

approved for patent to the State of Alaska along the Arctic Coast be-

tween the Colville and Canning Rivers. This situation will change

markedly during the next few years because the Alaska Native Claims

Settlement Act authorized the selection of large tracts by the Eskimo

inhabitants of the Northwest and made possible the resumption of state

land selections by removing the reason for the "land freeze" imposed

by the Secretary of the Interior in 1966. After state and Native land

selections are over, about 20 million acres will have passed out of

federal ownership. (See Table III-19.)

The State of Alaska has tentatively selected several areas in the

Northwest as shown in Figure III-5. At present it is not known whether

the State will have priority in selecting these lands over the Secretary

of the Interior, who was given permission by the Congress under the Native

Claims Act to withdraw up to 80 million acres for possible inclusion in

the National Parks, National Wildlife Refuge, and Wild Rivers systems. 1

There can be little doubt that some changes in development strate-

gies and patterns will result from these changes in land ownership. The

changes will be different in scope and rate for each of the three regions

making up Northwest Alaska.

*This section was completed prior to the Secretary of Interior's March 15, 197~ announcement of extensive federal withdrawals. However, the map on page 85 does reflect these withdrawals.

Page 100: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Region

Seward

Kobuk

North

84

Table III-19

Native, State, and Federal Lands,a Existing and Planned for Acquisition in Northwest Alaska

Native State b Federal (thousands of acres)

Peninsula 1,857 4,032 l,936c

2,562 3,162 10,630d

Slope 4,806 5,300f 34,76le

Total 9,225 12, 494 47,327

Total

7,825

16 ,354

44,867

69,046

Notes: aDoes not include withdrawals of March 15, 1972.

b Excluding federal and unappropriated public lands.

c Includes proposals in the Imuruk Basin and along the Shis-maref coast. The Department of Interior has taken no posi­tion as yet on its Alaskan selections under the Native Claims Act and the above are national interest lands that have been identified by various government agencies.

d • Includes the Kobuk Sand Dunes, Onion Portage, Upper Noatak Valley, and the headwaters of the Kobuk around Walker Lake.

elncludes the existing reserves plus small areas around Cape Lisburne and small additions to the Arctic National Wildlife Range.

fExisting, tentatively approved and applied for state lands north of the Brooks Range.

Source: Alaska Federation of Natives, 1971; press release by the Office of the Governor of Alaska as reported in the Anchorage Daily News, 1972; and the Alaska Wilderness Council from the Bureau of Land Management.

Page 101: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

..

CHUKCHI

PC:NT HOPE

-t,;,,. <"~'9

(I~

SEA

.!'ov

"'"

. . BEAUFORT SEA

.-.-·KA-~vnc

I

\ I I

\ I I

·· -.. _:'i~A~i: :-i,O;:: ::llll!llllllllllllllli'' •i,.~f~l~,~111\I _, . , \

LEGrnD NORTON SOUND fifillH Lands selected by Stote

Lands under Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act

Figure III-5

Lands Tentatively Approved for Patent to State of Alaska and State-Selected Lands and

Lands Eligible for Selection by Natives (March 28, 1972)

I I

\ I l

\ I I

...

°' "'

Page 102: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

86

Seward Peninsula

The area referred to here as the Seward Peninsula is generally

the same as the region covered by the Bering Straits Native Association,

and is one of the districts which will form a regional corporation. Each

village in the Bering Straits Native Association will have the right to

select up to 1,856,815 acres from the 25 townships contiguous to each

village,2

under the provisions of the Native Claims Settlement Act which

call for land distribution according to population. There will be no

regional selections by the Bering Straits Native Association under the

"land lost" formula used in making regional allocations, That formula

is the means by which land will be distributed to Native corporations

according to the amount of land to which they laid aboriginal claim.

The amount of land which the population of the Seward Peninsula will

receive is equal to or greater than the amount it would receive under

the "land lost" formula.

There are Indian Reservations existing in the area at Elim and

Wales. The Wales reservation is very small, but that at Elim is con­

siderably larger than the four townships that place is entitled to

select under the Act. Both villages could elect to keep their reserva­

tion status by forgoing their entitlements and privileges under the land

claims legislation.

The State of Alaska has made application for 4,032,000 acres in

a single bloc in the northern part of the Seward Peninsula. 3 This

effectively separates state selections from those of the Natives which

lie generally along the southern and western coasts. The area applied

for by the state includes lands with some mineral potential and the

Page 103: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

87

lava beds in the upper portion of the Imuruk Basin which is also being

considered as a national interest area.

State and Native proposed selections together total about 5,888,815

acres or about 70 percent of the region's land area. Possible federal

selections have not been detailed as yet but they are not expected to

be large.

Final land distribution patterns on the Seward Peninsula would

thus appear to follow a pattern of Native land holdings along the

southern and western coasts with limited private and federal holdings

interspersed. State lands would dominate the northern half of the

peninsula. The great bulk of the unreserved public domain might be

in the areas of the Darby and Bendeleben Mountains.

The bulk of the reindeer grazing lands would lie in the Native

areas and the unreserved public domain, but enough of these lands would

belong to the state to make range management a problem requiring a high

degree of inter-governmental and private cooperation. Fisheries re­

sources in the coastal zone would appear to lie primarily in the Native

zones since many of the village sites were originally selected due to

their nearness to such resources.

The mineral resources of the peninsula seem to be widely distributed

enough that the federal and state governments and the Natives should have

a chance at having some valuable lands under their control. It appears

that the great bulk of potential mineral lands will remain under state

and federal control due to the nonparticipation by the Bering Straits

Native Association in regional land selection.

Page 104: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

88

Kobuk Valley

The Northwest Native Association largely covers the Kobuk Valley

and its associated coastal areas. The regional corporation to be set

up under the Native Claims Settlement Act takes in the villages of

Deering, Candle, and Buckland, which are geographically a part of the

Seward Peninsula but which are a part of the Kotzebue trade and poli-

tical area.

This corporation will have rights to about 1,743,860 acres in

village and 818,567 acres in regional selections for a total of

4 2,562,427 acres. There is an existing Indian Reservation at Noorvik

covering about four townships (92,160 acres).

In the Kobuk, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has established

two classification areas near Bornite and on the Baldwin Peninsula

(near Kotzebue) within which permission must be secured for land

utilization. Those two areas represent the only major federal land

classifications in the Kobuk region at this time.

Application has been made by the State of Alaska for 3,162,000

acres in the vicinity of Walker Lake on the periphery of the Kobuk

region. 5 This selection may conflict with planned federal withdrawals

for the long proposed Gates of the Arctic National Park. There are no

other proposed state land selections in the Kobuk area at this time,

which would make it one of the largest regions in the state with no

state land holdings.

Other possible federal actions in this area are a Wild River desig-

nation for the Noatak above the village of Noatak (a move which has strong

support in the Kotzebue community) and a national interest lands designation

Page 105: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

89

for the sand dunes in the central Kobuk and the archeological sites

at Onion Portage.

Generally, in the Kobuk there see~s to be little conflict between

the aims of the Northwest Native Association, the State of Alaska, and

the Federal government with the exception of the area around Walker

Lake. Native claim areas will probably surround the Kennecott mining

claims in the Bornite area which will limit expansion of the Kennecott

operation unless agreement is reached with the village and regional

corporations.

North Slope

Large existing federal withdrawals and pre-existing approved and

applied-for state selections complicate the equitable adjudication of

the competing interests in North Slope land. The two major existing

federal land withdrawals in the area now are Naval Petroleum Reserve

Number 4 (NPR No. 4) and the Arctic National Wildlife Range. Both of

these withdrawals are north of the Brooks Range and have limited the

area of private petroleum exploration to the area between the Colville

and Canning Rivers and the coastal region around Point Lay on the

Beaufort seacoast. Almost half ·of Alaska north of the Brooks Range

is encompassed in these special purpose federal withdrawals.

Total selections by the Arctic Slope Native Association could

reach 4,806,087 acres with 1,060,120 in village and 3,745,967 in re­

gional selections. 6 Since regional subsurface selections cannot be

made in NPR No. 4 or the Arctic Wildlife Range, the entire regional

selection for subsurface rights will fall in the central area between

Page 106: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

90

the Colville and Canning Rivers and along the Beaufort Sea coastline

(the area of most petroleum activity).

In its selections filed on January 24, 1972, the State of Alaska

did not identify any new lands which it wished to select north of the

Brooks Range. The region between the two federal withdrawals, south

of the previously applied for state lands and north of the Brooks

Range, is available for Native selection.

Proposals may be presented for major federal wildlife and water­

fowl sanctuaries on the North Slope. These could be surface selections

in the present NPR No. 4, since such surface use could prove compatible

with any carefully controlled potential petroleum exp.loration or <level-

opment.

All of the villages in the Arctic Slope Native Association lie

wholly or in part within federal withdrawals except Point Hope and

Point Lay. Point Lay lies within a township that has been tentatively

approved for selection by the State of Alaska. Those villages lying

within the federal withdrawals will be able to select their surface

use lands from the surrounding townships, but regional selections for

subsurface rights to village lands must be made elsewhere. This will

create large blocs of land where surface rights belong to the federal

government and subsurface to the Arctic Slope Native Association, with

equally large blocs around the villages where the reverse is true. 7

There are no more than 7 ,000 ,000 acres of potentially petroliferous

land available for subsurface selection by the Arctic Slope Native Asso­

ciation, and that association's regional selections could utilize almost

70 percent of this area. To a much greater degree than in the other

Page 107: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

91

regions of the Northwest, a satisfactory North Slope settlement will

require competent cooperative management practices by the state, federal

government, and the Native regional corporation.

Alaska Native Fund Payments

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 provides for pay­

ments of up to $962.5 million to individuals, to village corporations

and to thirteen regional corporations. Part of the money will be dis­

tributed on the basis of population, and part of the basis of "land

lost," or the land area claimed to which the people had aboriginal

rights. The Northwest Region has roughly one-fifth of the state's

Native population, and so can anticipate receiving around one-fifth

of the total money distributed. The Congress has authorized $462.5

million in treasury funds to be disbursed to Natives according to a

fixed schedule. Also, the Congress has required the State of Alaska

and the United States to pay two percent of all rents, royalties and

bonuses up to $500 million from Alaska mineral leases to the Natives.

A combination of the Settlement Act's schedule of treasury payments

with a projected schedule of royalties from Prudhoe Bay oil production

results in a ballpark projection of the revenues per year to Alaska

Natives, and to the Northwest Region in particular. This estimate

ignores mineral and timber revenues from Native-owned lands and other

revenues, assumes that the trans-Alaska pipeline begins operating in

1975, and assumes that no other further major oil fields go into pro-

8 duct ion.

As can be seen from Table III-20 the Northwest Region as a whole

will be receiving an amount of between $2.5 and $12.5 million, of

Page 108: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Year

1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983

92

Table Ill-20

Preliminary Estimate of Income to Northwest Region from Native Claims Settlement

Prudhoe Bay -Northwest From Oil Northwest

From U.S. Region Rents, Bonuses Region Treasury Share and Royalties* Share

(millions of dollars)

12.5 2.5 50.0 10.0 70.0 15.0 40.0 8.0 12.3 2.5 30.0 6.0 25.5 5.1 30.0 6.0 27.2 5.4 30.0 6.0 29.0 5.8 30.0 6.0 30.7 6.1 30.0 6.0 32.6 6.5

34.3 6.9 35.6 7.1 36.1 7.2

Total Northwest Income

2.5 10.0 15.0 10.5 11.1 11.4 11. 8 12.1 12.5 6.9 7.1 7.2

118.1

*It has been assumed that total mineral income will include nine-tenths Prudhoe Bay oil royalties and rentals, and one-tenth income from other mineral production ($50 million). Of that amount, 20 percent or $10 million is added to the Northwest total.

Source: House of Representatives, 92nd Congress, 1st Session, Report No. 92-746, Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, December 13, 1971.

Arlon R. Tussing, George W. Rogers and Victor Fischer, Alaska Pipeline Report, University of Alaska, Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, Fairbanks, 1971, p. 79.

Page 109: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

93

which ten percent goes to the village corporation, but the village cor­

porations may elect to contribute their share to joint projects with the

regional corporation, This means that a maximum of $2.2 to $11.2 million

will be available per year to the regional corporation to undertake eco­

nomic development and for other purposes.

A comparison of this amount with the estimated capital requirements

of the major resource extraction ventures mentioned elsewhere in this

report (see Minerals and Mining) indicate that the Natives' money would

be inadequate to start such operations. Other enterprises such as com­

mercial reindeer production or development of tourism are more consistent

with the amount of capital which is likely to be available.

In addition, a significant portion of the Natives' income is likely

to go to physical plant improvements such as housing, utilities and other

construction projects. This form of spending would generate carge re­

quirements, as would the higher incomes of individual Natives. These

increases are included in the projected cargo requirements in Chapter V,

Future Prospects for Waterborne Commerce.

Form of Government

All of Northwest Alaska is included in an undergoverned entity

known as the Unorganized Borough. Alaska's form of regional government,

the borough, has never been extended to these regions. There are a few

state offices in the Northwest, and most services are provided by offices

in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau. Federal programs are administered

from a complex of regional organizations that is gradually being centralized

in Seattle with suboffices in Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Juneau, The Northwest

Page 110: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

94

Region's distance from govern1nent centers and its lack of a regional

government means that small villages must often negotiate in their own

behalf with sophisticated bureaucracies.

Local Government

Local government is provided by cities, unincorporated villages,

and groups developed by the Rural Alaska Community Action Program

(RurALCAP). Of the 35 communities in Northwest Alaska, 20 are incor-

porated as fourth class cities and only one, Nome, is a first class

city (see Table 111-21).

The reason why the towns chose a fourth class position is that

fourth class cities do not have to pay for the operation and maintenance

of local schools. Most of these communities cannot even begin to approach

having the tax base necessary to support their schools and probably will

not in the foreseeable future despite generous matching funds available

from the State of Alaska. However, a fourth class community may Il;Ot

levy property taxes and special assessments. Thus, they are severely

limited in their ability to improve or add other urban services.

The major incorporated communities rely upon a sales tax for the

bulk of their revenues. Nome, the only city with property taxing power,

collects almost as much from its three percent sales tax as from its

9 property assessments. Barrow also has a three percent sales tax, as

does Kotzebue. This represents the ceiling for both communities per-

mitted under state law. The total revenues for Barrow and Kotzebue,

including state-shared revenues, come to about $100,000 each compared

10 to about $533 ,000 for Nome. Since Barrow and Kotzebue are five to

Page 111: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

95

Table III-21

Number of Communities in Northwest Alaska, Qualified and Incorporated as Cities

Cities First Class Second Class Fourth Class Total

Region Qual. In corp. Qual. Incorp. Qual. Incorp. Qual. In corp.

Seward Peninsula 2 1 14 8 16 9

Kobuk Valley 3 9 10 12 10

North Slope 1 5 1 2 7 2

Total 6 1 28 1 20 35 21

Source: Alaska Municipal League Directory, 1972.

to six times larger than the next largest villages in their area, the

revenue of the smaller villages must be on the order of five to ten

times smaller than $100,000. Meager revenues mean that the cities are

extremely limited in the services they may provide.

The City of Nome has reached the point where it offers all normal

city services, including utilities, to the community. Sewer and water

are provided to the downtown area only and will be difficult and expen-

sive to expand as they are everywhere in the Arctic. Kotzebue and

Barrow also provide the normal urban services but to a much more

restricted degree. Nome is the only community having control of its

own school system; and even there the state regional high school plays

a significant role in community education.

Page 112: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

96

Only two of the Northwest towns, .Nome and Barrow, have city managers.

Kotzebue has a full-time city clerk. In all of the other incorporated

towns and villages, the civic government is handled by part-time or

volunteer efforts, usually of the village council members.

The makeup of the village council will usually determine the overall

trend and life style of the village. Some communities are extremely

strict in enforcement of local ordinances on dog control, drunkenness,

waste disposal, and other such problems while others are lax. Often a

new council will significantly change the overall style of a community.

The individual schoolteachers and clergy in small communities can

have a major effect on villagers' moral beliefs, behavior, and attitude

towards white society and government. The representatives of the regional

Native organizations and of the Alaska Federation of Natives can also play

a part in determining village attitudes.

RurALCAP

The Rural Community Action Program in Alaska has recognized the need

to give more control of local and regional government to the affected

citizens and has formed two regional development corporations in the

area: the Inupiak Development Corporation of 18 villages that generally

falls within the area of the Bering Straits Native Association (roughly,

the Seward Peninsula); and the Kitigruk Development Corporation of 12

villages whose area clearly matches that of the Northwest Alaska Native

Association (roughly, the Kobuk area). 11 No RurALCAP organization has

been formed for the Arctic Slope but Kaktovik is a part of the Upper

Yukon Development Corporation fO rmed by RurALCAP.

Page 113: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

97

The priorities of the development corporations, in addition to

local government, have been housing and land claims. Prior to the

passage of the Native Claims Settlement Act, RurALCAP had an active

program, in conjunction with Alaska Legal Services, to insure that

everyone entitled to a 160-acre Native land allotment registered for

his land. This program was designed to provide a fallback position

in case the Native claims were not successfully prosecuted and also

to take care of those families whose ancestral sites and lands were

beyond the confines of village and regional land selections. However,

only a very small number of Natives ever did apply for their allotment.

Other programs pursued by the development corporations have been

fisheries, co-ops, food stamp distribution, alcoholism counselling,

and arts and crafts. None of the economic development programs have

had marked success.

The executive boards of the corporations are made up of a repre­

sentative from each village. There is a permanent staff of a director,

a program officer, and a secretary for each of the two groups. Each

village representative is expected to provide a focus for and leadership

of efforts in his home village. RurALCAP has provided a focal point

for the concepts of regional cooperation and government to be expressed

and developed in the Seward Peninsula and the Kobuk. It has given ex­

perience in the dynamics of working together to Natives and has laid

a base for both the regional corporations called for by the Native

Claims Settlement ASt and any future regional governments that are es­

tablished in Northwest Alaska.

Page 114: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

98

Prospects for Regional Government

During 1970 and 1971, the Arctic Slope Native Association organized

and laid the groundwork for the creation of a borough covering all of

Alaska north of the Brooks Range. On February 25, 1972, the local

boundary commission approved a petition for incorporation as a first

class borough. Pending an election approving the plan, the borough

should become operative in the spring.

Three possible reasons why borough status is desirable are that

(a) a borough has the power to levy property taxes, (b) a borough may

issue bonds on the strength of its tax base, and (c) a borough has the

right to select up to ten percent of the unappropriated state lands

within its area. Thus, for example, the North Slope borough might be

able to tax oil company property and issue bonds for school construction.

Under Alaska law, boroughs in thinly populated areas without first

class cities may be established with a five-man borough assembly, a

borough manager or chairman, and a borough clerk. Thus, the bare bones

of government can be provided at a cost probably within the means of

even the poorest of the prospective local governments.12

Native asso­

ciations on the Seward Peninsula and in the Kobuk area are eying the

success of the Arctic Slope Natives and may follow their example in

the near future.

The regional corporations that will be established under the claims

settlement act can easily find themselves filling the role of governments

in the absence of some other form of regional government. The net effect

could well be that funds derived from the claims and intended for economic

and social development would be diverted to provide everyday maintenance

Page 115: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

99

services. Some fOrm of local and regional government would seem to

be a necessary corollary to the successful implementation of the re­

gional corporations and other provisions of the claims settlement act.

The next twenty or thirty years will bring an increasing amount

of regional organization to Northwest Alaska, in the form of regional

corporations, boroughs, and other institutions. Insofar as economic

development and increases in commerce are concerned, the supra-village

forms of organization will be able to consolidate natural, social and

financial resources and use them more efficiently. However, the paucity

of the resources will continue to be a limiting factor.

Page 116: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

100

Footnotes

1. Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, Section 17.10.d2A.

2. Unpublished report by Ken Bass to the Alaska Federation of Natives dated December 16, 1971, p. 4.

3. Anchorage Daily News, January 23, 1972, p. 1.

4. Ken Bass, op. cit., p. 5.

5. Anchorage Daily News, op. cit.

6 . Ken Bass , op. cit. , p . 5.

7. Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, Section 11.

8. Arlan R. Tussing, George W. Rogers and Victor Fischer, Alaska Pipeline Report, University of Alaska, Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, Fairbanks, 1971.

9. Alaska Municipal League 1972 Directory, Juneau, Alaska. Nome entry - sales tax $167,946.86; property taxes $172,787.87.

10. Alaska Municipal League 1972 Directory, Juneau, Alaska. Barrow and Nome entries; Kotzebue information from the comprehensive development plan for Kotzebue prepared by the Alaska State Housing Authority.

11. There are some different organizations: namely, Deering, Candle and Buckland are a part of the Bering Straits but not the Inupiak group, while Point Hope is a member of the Kokotugruk corporation but belongs to the Arctic Slope Native Association.

12. Conversation with John Shively, Director of Alaska RurALCAP, January 27, 1972.

Page 117: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

CHAPTER IV TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS IN NORTHWEST ALASKA

Transportation Systems

Shipment Routes

Waterborne Transportation

Airborne Transportation

Road Network

Page 118: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

102

Transportation Systems

Six tons of freight enter Alaska by water for every ton of freight

that enters by air; nothing enters the region by road or rail, although

there are a few intraregional roads. All passenger traffic into and out

of the region is by air. The waterborne and airborne transport system~

of Northwest Alaska meet at Nome, Kotzebue, Barrow, and Prudhoe Bay

(see Figure IV-6). A limited road system serves. the southern part of

the Seward Peninsula and a network of roads radiates from Prudhoe Bay

serving oil field exploration and development in that area (see Figure

IV-7). The State of Alaska has plans to construct a road joining Nome

and Fairbanks via an expected copper mining operation at Bo mite. The

spur connecting Bomite with Fairbanks is likely to be built before

1990, but the tentative conclusion of this study is that a road all

the way from Nome to Fairbanks is not likely before the tum of the

century.

Shipment Routes

/

Seattle is the major gathering point for freight moving into North-

west Alaska. All of the seagoing tug companies that serve the Northwest,

as well as the Bureau of Indian Affairs' "Norths tar" are based there.

Seattle served as homeport for Alaska Steamship Company which is no

longer in operation. The parent company of Alaska Steamship, Skinner

Corporation, is also based in Seattle, and still operates the Alaska

Trainship Corporation which runs the railcar vessel "Alaska" between

Vancouver, British Columbia and Whittier, Alaska. According to Alaska

Industry magazine, there are reports that this company plans to add an

additional railship to its line in the very near future. 1

Page 119: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

; / ,,

-"" /

.,,..,,, -/CAPE LISBUR~

I -

----- ....... __.-- ••·•· - .. .. - :• - -~

••• '~ ~ PRUCHOE BARTER ISLAND . .:~'i-•&··········--

~ . I LEGEND

I I I • ..

---·-......... \ . . I \ . . I

MARINE TRANSPORTATION

AIR JET ROUTES

AIR BUSH ROUTES

I ..

•·• ••. • · . ...

... ,,,,,.-------- .... ~-

\ . . I \ . / KOTZ;;~ .....

/ SHISHM~; / \(\~~··_••••••••••••••OsHUNGNAK \ -~ __,]•

. I \ . . I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

TO SEATTL! a I OTHER PORTS

......... . \ ,. ~:.lfeucKLAND ............... • •

/• ...... ··cANDLE ......... \ /

.. ......... ............... /... ..··· . ·v· ... ·· . - .......... ......_ O~E -'\ ~.~

•••••:.XJ.?F•-·-·-· -·-·-· -·-·~ FAl(IBANKS

I •

TO ANCHORAGI! 'TO ANCHORAG!

Figure IV-6

Existing Marine and Air Transportation Routes of Northwest Alaska

·-

Page 120: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

..

BARROW

,

l I I I I I l I I I I I

BORNIT! I

~u·- K ,,?------- . l - , ---' . ---- -----\ ....... ....... _________ ,.,

COUNCii.

LEGEND

EXISTING ROADS

---- PROPOSED ROADS (MENTIONED IN TEXT}

PROPOSED RAILROADS (MENTIONED IN TEXTl

Figure IV-7

FAIRBANKS

Existing and Proposed Rail and Road Routes of Northwest Alaska

,.,.:,:

..

Page 121: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

105

The tug companies have in recent years, however, picked up freight

for Alaska's North Slope from as far away as Japan and Texas. It was

found from the Federal Maritime Commission's study in 1964 that even

2 then freight movement patterns were changing. The Seattle wholesaler

is playing an ever decreasing role as the source of goods for Alaska.

Alaskan purchasers are more and more ordering directly from suppliers

beyond Seattle -- steel from East Coast steel mills or chickens from

the South. These goods move directly by railcar through Seattle or

other West Coast ports to Alaskan ports, such as Anchorage, Whittier,

Valdez, and Kodiak. This service eliminates excessive handling and

reduces middlemen's profits.

However, there is no direct hydrotrain service to Northwest

Alaska at present nor are any plans known. Hydrotrain service does

lower the total cost of freight movement into the Northwest by lowering

freight rates to Anchorage and Fairbanks, the principal points for for-

warding air cargo to the area.

Anchorage, with its year-round ice-free harbor and improved facil-

ities and its road and rail connections to the Interior, is the main

redistribution point for the state. Shipments to the Northwest are

usually sent by water from Seattle to Anchorage and then by air to

the Northwest. Also, in the summer months, goods are shipped from

Anchorage by rail to Nenana and then via the Yukon River into the

Interior. The only transshipments by sea that could be ascertained

from company records showed that 4,000 tons of goods were moved from

Anchorage to Prudhoe Bay in 1969, and in August of 1971 slightly over

2,000 tons of prefabricated school buildings were moved to Kotzebue

for redistribution to other villages.

Page 122: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

106

Shipment by water to Anchorage and then transfer to air-freight

or air-mail is feasible principally because of the high cost of lighter­

age in the Northwest. A combination of air and water shipping seems to

be rate competitive with existing all-water routing, is quicker and re­

duces the necessity of maintaining large inventories at destination. 3

Fairbanks is another logical gateway. It is the northern terminus

of the Alaska Railroad and the Alaska Highway. Fairbanks is connected

to major southern ports by all-weather roads. Because it is Alaska's

second largest city, it generates enough demand by itself to cause

primary movement of goods into the Interior. Further, it serves as

a warehousing area for goods which come up from Anchorage by road or

rail.

Waterborne Transportation

The main advantage of water transportation is that it is cheap;

its main disadvantage is that it is slow. During the North Slope oil

exploration boom in 1968-69, water transportation was passed over in

favor of air, but a shift was made to waterborne commerce at the earliest

opportunity in the summer of 1969. 4

Waterborne transportation in North­

west Alaska is not as cheap as it is elsewhere because of the lack of

deep water ports and the short ice-free season. In most ports, at

least some cargo must be offloaded to lighters and brought ashore.

World War II Liberty Ships have given way to sea-going barges as

the primary unit of waterborne commerce in the past several years.

Alaska Steamship Company, the last of the Liberty Ship operators, closed

out its operations to the Northwest in 1970, The sole remaining operator

Page 123: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

107

of deep draft cargo vessels is the Bureau of Indian Affairs which uses

the "'Northstar" to supply freight to villages and towns of the Northwest.

A major reason for the change from ships to sea-going barges is the

lack of adequate ports. Barges can go into shallower waters, and are

cheaper to operate even with small volume loads. However, barges are ............----~-----~---- ------- - -

slower than vessels and are more prone to accidents. ~es

for barges in Alaska are among ~he hi_glil'_s_t .. in. the world. In many areas

of Northwest Alaska, even barges must anchor offshore and be partially

offloaded until the draft is sufficiently shallow to allow a landing.

Some cargo such as petroleum can be offloaded without lightering by

means of floating hoses and other equipment which obviate the need

for dockside handling.

Lighterage charges on an unweighted average of 41 commodities were

$1.35 per 100 pounds in 1965. At that time, $1.35 was approximately

one-quarter of the average deep draft vessel rate from Seattle to

Kotzebue. At present, lighterage costs constitute a comparable per-

centage of the total of freight transportation. Tables IV-22 and IV-23

contain information on the interrelation among price levels, freight

charges and lighterage rates in 1965. (More recent detailed information

was not obtainable.)

Interregional Freight

As shown in Table IV-24, the primary companies moving freight into

the region now are barge lines and barge operations of franchised petro-

leum products dealers. If the North Slope-bound cargo is subtracted from

the total freight, a net cargo to the Northwest of around 75-80,000 tons

remains for each year.

Page 124: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Table IV-22

Comparison of Lighterage and Ocean Freight Rates in Selected Ports of the Northwest Region - 1965a

(Rates in cents per 100 pounds or cents per cubic foot)

Commodity Des crip ti on

Com­mod­dity Code

Appliances 3 Beverages, Malt {Beer) 5 Beverages, Alcoholic 6 Beverages, Carbonated 7 Building Materials 9 Cement (in bag) 11 Cigarettes ·12 Eggs (fresh in 14

cartons) Freight, N.O.S. 17

(100 lbs.) Freight, N.O.S. 17

(Cubic feet) Fruits & Vegetables 18

a. Fresh b. Refrigerated

Furniture, Not Com- 19 pletely K. D.

Groceries No. I N/B 20 Groceries No. II N/B 21 Household Goods 22 Insulating Material, 23 Not Wall Board or Plasterboard

Lettuce, Chilled 24

Kotzebue

B & R Tug & Barge, Ocean Light-Frei~ht erage Rate Ratec·

598-1/4 390-1/4 625 440-1/4

¢130-3/ 4 236-1/2

¢204-3/8 711-1/4

291-1/4

¢145-5/8

¢149-5/8 ¢213-5/8 ¢105-3/5

274-1/4 332-3/4 642-1/4 651-5/8

¢213-5/8

153 94

121 94

¢33 66

¢60-1/2 79

68

634

643 ¢43 ¢33

66 83

204 160

¢43

Legend: ~ Rate is in cents per cubic feet~ N/B Northbound Rate. S/B Southbound Rate.

_;:

Inc. Lighter age as % of Ocean Freight Rate

26% 24 19 21 25 28 30 11

23

23

29 20 31

24 25 32 25

20

Nome

Lomen Commercial Ocean Light-Freight Rateb

529'-l/4 360-1/4 575 397-1/4

¢114-1/2 203-1/Ze

¢195-3/8 650-1/4

274-1/4

¢137-1/8

¢140-5/8 ¢180-5/8 ¢96-3/5

256-1/4 316-3/4 567-1/4 591-5/8

¢180-5/8

er age Rated

153 125 192 no ¢31

53 ¢60-1/2 161

68

¢34

¢39-1/2 ¢39-1/2 ¢20

66 83

167 158

¢39-1/2

Company Lighter age as % of Ocean Freight Rate

29% 35 33 28 27 26 31 25

25

25

28 22 ll

26 26 29 27

22

,... 0 00

Page 125: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

--····----~ --·~----· . ~-~-~~-~-------------------:-~ - T -·---· - -----

Table IV-22 (continued)

Kotzebue Nome Com- B & R Tug & Barge 2 Inc. Lomen Commercial ComEany mod .. Ocean Light- Lighterage Ocean Light- Lighter age

Commodity dity Freight erage as % of Ocean Freitt er age as -% of Ocean Description Code Rateb RateC Freight Rate Rate Rated Freight Rate

Lumber, Softwood, 25 $66.69f $17.60f 26% $57.68f $15.40f 27% Less 32 1

Matches 26 ¢153-5/8 ¢42 27 ¢145-5/8 ¢34 23 1·1eat 27 875-1/4 79 9 791-1/4 99 13 Oil, Petroleum & 31 ¢103-1/8 ¢29 20 ¢94-1/8 ¢25-1/2 27

fetroleum Products, viz: Lube Oil

Pipe, Iron & Steel, 32 ¢145-5/8 ¢34 23 137-1/8 ¢34 25 Less than 2411 in Diameter

Plywood, Softwood 33 321-1/4 86 27 276-1/4 83 30 ..... Potatoes (no Re- 34 274-1/4 72 26 256-1/4 66 26 0

'° frigeration) Salt , Common 36 206-1/2 68 33 186-1/2 68 36 Tire, Rubber 38 402-1/4 68 17 378-1/4 95 25 Roofing 39 ¢129-5/8 ¢33 25 ¢113-1/8 ¢31 27 Fish, Canned (1 lb. 40 200-1/4 66 33 17&-l/4 54 30 or larger)

Motor Vehicles 41 a. Private Passenger 1,187-1/4 330 28 1,117-1/4. 275 24

N/B Private Passenger 987-1/ 4 330 33 917-1/4 275 30

S/B b. Trucks, 3/4 and 1,177-1/4 330 28 1,107-1/4 275 25

Pickup N/B Trucks, 3/4 and 977-1/4 330 34 907-1/4 275 30

Pickup S/B Coal (in sacks) 44 127-1/4 51 40 117-1/4 40 34 Grapefruit 47

a. Fresh ¢149-5/8 ¢43 29 ¢140-5/8 ¢39-1/2 28 b. Refrigerated ¢213-5/8 ¢43 20 ¢180-5/8 ¢39-1/2 22

Legend: ¢ Rate is in cents per cubic feet. N/B Northbound Rste. S/B Southbound Rate.

Page 126: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Table IV-22 (continued)

Kotzebue Nome Com- B & R Tug & Barg_e z Inc. Lomen Commercial ComEanz mod- Ocean Light- Lighter age Ocean L~ght- Lighterage

Commodity ity Frei~ht er age as % of O::e.a.."l Frei~ht er age as % of 0 cea."1.

Description Code Rate RateC Freight Rate Rate Rated :Freight Rate

Machinery 50 a. Derricks & ¢113-1/8 ¢29 26% ¢105-1/8 ¢26-1/2 25

Gradersg Ores and Concentrates 51 150-1/2 51 34 133-1/2 40 30

S/B Wallboard (in Solid 55 374-1/4 95 25 330-1/4 83 25

Flat Sheets) Fish, Canned (Less 56 230-1/4 66 29 204-1/4 54. 26

thar. 1 lb. cans) Gasoline 58 ¢107 ¢32 30 ¢99-1/2 ¢25-1/2 26

Total 21,845-1/3 5 ,572-1/2 19,333 5,034

Average Rate 532. 81 135. 91 26% 471.53 122.78 26%

aFrom Alaska Steamship Company tariffs FMC-F No. 51, and FMC-F No. 119, and supplements thereto; B & R Tug and Barge, Inc. tariff FMC-F No. SA and supplements thereto; Lomen Commercial Company tariff FMC-F No. 9 and supplements thereto.

b These rates include wharfag,e and handling at Seattle.

~ighterage charges are based on weight or measure as shown on ocean ship's manifest.

dLighterage charges are based on weight or measure. Where rates are stated in cents per 100 pounds or cents per cubic foot, the rate which produce,s the larger revenue applies.

eA rate of 222-1/2 cents per 100 pounds on shipments of a minimum weigh; of 200,000 pounds is also applicable. This rate expired October 31, 1965.

£This rate is in dollars per 1000 board feet.

gDerricks only.

Legend: ¢ Rate is in cents per cubic feet. N/B Northbound Rate. S/B Southbolmd Rate.

,.... ,.... 0

Page 127: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

:-~ T

Table IV-23

Relationship Between Freight Charges and Price Levels - 1965,a Seattle to Nome

Percent Retail

Ocean Wholesale Percent Ocean Total Percent Price Weight Freight Price Freight Charge Freight Total Freight Nome Exceeds

Per Charge (F.O.B.) Is Of Seattle Charge b Is Of Seattle Retail Landed Col!llllodity Unit Unit* Per Unit Seattle F.O.B. Price Per Unit F.O.B. Price Price Coste

Alcoholic Case 33 189. 75c $ 60. 45 3.14% 229. 68c 3.80% $ 63.25 o. 80% Beverages

Roofing Roll 45 114 .03¢ $ 2.54 44.89 147.44¢ 58.05 Asphalt Ton 2,000 $ 49. 89 $ 25.00 199 .56 $ 62.65 250.60 Cement Sack 94 l91.29c $ 1. 34 142. 75 25:i. :i3c 189.05 Lettuce -Refrigerated lb. 1 10.84¢ 14.00c 77.43 13.42c 95. 86 19.00 0 188. ll Non-refriger. lb. 1 8.44c 14.00c 60.29 11.02c 78. 71 79.00c 215.75 ,._.

Milk Qt. 2.38 16 .07c 24.50c 65.59 19. 95c 81.43 71.00¢ 59.73 ,._. ,._.

Washing Each 2.50 $ 13. 23 $109 .15 12,12 $ 17 .06 15.63 $163.00 29.15 Machine

Oranges -Non-Refriger. lb. l 5.27c 12.00¢ 43.92 6. 88c 57.33 39 .00¢ 106.57 Refrigerated lb. 1 6. 77c 12.00¢ 56.42 8.38¢ 69.83 39 .OOc 91.36

Cigarettes Case 41.80 534.92c $112. 80 4.74 100 .56c 6.21 Refrigerator Each 230 $ 12.17 $186. 50 6.53 $ 15.69 8.41 Beer Case 28 lOO. 87c $ 3.20 31.52 127.19c 39. 75 Insulating 34 200. 77c $ 58.00 3.46 255.17c 4.40 Hate rial

Meat lb. l 7. 9lc 46.00¢ 17.20 8.70c '18.91 69.00c 26.14 Potatoes lb. l 2.56¢ 8.80¢ 29.09 3.28c 37.27 20.ooc 65.56 Sugar Bag 10 25.63¢ $ 1. 01 25.38 32.23¢ 31. 91 $ 2.54 90.98 Coca Cola Case 20.35 80. 84¢ $ 2.64 30.62 99. 97c 37.87 Lumber 1,000 BP.! 2,150 $ 5 7. 68 $ 54.21 106.40 $ 75.28 BFM 138.87 Eggs Dozen 1.80 11. 70¢ 42.50¢ 27.53 13.12¢ 30.87 98.00¢ 76.20 Flour Bag 5 12. 81¢ 33.00c 38. 82 16.llc 48.82 $ 1.09 121. 95 Apples -

Non-Refriger. lb. l 5.27c 17.00c 31.00 6.88¢ 40.47 39.00¢ 63.32 Refrigerated lb. 1 6. 77c 17.00¢ 39.82 8.38¢ 49.29 39.00c 53.66

Page 128: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

~

Ocean Weight Freight

Per Charge Commodity Unit Unit* Per Unit

Dresser, S.U. Each 90 914.63¢ Lube Oil Qt. 2 4.80¢ Common Salt Sack 50 . 93.25¢ Paint Gallon 12 32. 91¢

*Weight in pounds.

Table IV-23 (continued)

Wholesale Percent Ocean Total Price Freight Charge Freight (F.O.B.) Is Of Seattle Charge b Seattle F.O.B. Price Per Unit

$ 50.90 17. 97% $ 12.27 32. 80¢ 14.63 6.28¢ 95.00¢ 98.16 127 .25¢

$ 4.90 6.72 41.07¢

Percent Total Freight Is Of Seattle F .O.B. Price

24.11% 19.15

133.95 8.38

Noi.ue Retail Price

$ 8.60

Percent Retail Price Exceeds Landed Coste

61.96

aFrom: (1) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Crop Research Division, Agricultural Research Service and Alaska Agricultural Experiment Station. Quarterly Report on Alaska's Food Prices, various reports for 1965; (2) Lomen Com::c.ercial Company Tariff FMC-F No. 9 and supplements thereto; (3) Alaska Steamship Company tariffs FMC-F No. 51, E{C-F No. 114, FMC-F No. 119 and supplements thereto; (4) Letter, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Ewan Clague, Commissioner, June 28, 1965; (5) Letters, Federal Maritime Commission Field Auditor, June 7 and 16 1 1965; (6) Federal Maritime Commission field interviews of merchants in Alaska in July to Septewber 1965; and (7) FHC Form 109 questionnaire (requesting price data) various.

b 11 Total Freight Charge Per Unit11 consists of Alaska Steam's Ocean Freight Charge plus Nome lighter age charge (Lomen).

c"Landed Cost11 consists of Seattle FOB price plus Total Freight Charge.

..... ..... N

Page 129: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

113

Table IV-24

A Sununary of Freight Moved Interregion Between 1965 and 1970 by Water

Company 1965 1966 1967 1968 Short Tons

Puget Sound Tug & Barge Company

Arctic Marine Freight 5 '714 Alaska Puget Limited 27,453 23,219 32 '918 28,140

Foss Launch & Tug Co.

Alaska Steamship Co. 11, 996 10 ,062 9,325 8,647

Northstar B.I.A. a 14 ,000 14,000 14,000 14,000

Standard Oil Co. 25,334 24 '989

Northland Marine

Total Cargo 53,449 47,281 81,577 81,490

Less North Slope Cargo 5 '714

Net Cargo 75, 776

a Audit figures.

1969 1970

91,089 168' 194 26,057 27,945

7,000

10' 758 4 ,891

14,000 14,000

28,665 30,040

2,000 2,000

172 ,569 254,070

91,089 175,194

81,480 78,876

Source: The following sources were used: letter from M.W.D. McLean, Vice President, Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co., Seattle, Washing­ton, September 22, 1971; letter from J.E. Kirkpatrick, Western Alaskan Sales Manager, Foss Launch & Tug Co., Seattle, Washing­ton, August 26, 1971; according to V.R. Crabb, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Alaska Line (Alaska Steamship Co.), Seattle, Washington, letter of August 26, 1971 - Mr. Kirkpatrick was given the old records of Alaska Steamship as he was formerly Bering Sea Manager for this company, he there­fore supplied data for both Foss and Alaska Steamship Co.; conversation with Tom Osdale of Northland Marine, November 15, 1971 and Mr. Terrell, Assistant Traffic Manager, Standard Oil Company, October 9, 1971.

Page 130: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

114

Figure IV-8 graphs the contribution of petroleum products and

pipe (shipped to Prudhoe Bay for the pipeline) to cargo totals in the

Northwest Region. Figure IV-8 also graphs the relations of petroleum

products to all cargo for Nome harbor by activity, and is representative

of the area's demand for freight independent of oil development. Freight

landings for Nome are similar to other villages except Prudhoe and Barrow,

Freight landed in Barrow includes less petroleum products because the

town uses natural gas for heating, and Prudhoe receives large volumes of

specialized oil industry equipment. (Appendix A lists freight by type

entering Northwest ports.)

Northwest Region Ports

Starting from the mouth of the Yukon and moving northward, a brief

examination of the ports in Northwest Alaska reveal that they are almost

unijformly shallow and that

J St. Michael is one of

lightering is necessary.

the best sheltered harbors on the Bering

Coast. However, little of the freight that enters this harbor is in-

tended for the Northwest. Ocean-going vessels must lie offshore since

the docks can handle only a three-foot draft at low tide and about

seven feet on the highest tides. 5 The port serves as a point of trans-

shipment from sea-going to river transportation for the lower Yukon.

Generally, freight on the Yukon up to Marshall is handled through St.

Michael, while that above Marshall comes from Nenana, the riverport

for the Alaska Railroad. The institution of the service through Nenana

caused St. Michael to decline from its great days when it was the port

of entry for almost all freight on the portion of the Yukon River in

Page 131: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

... 240

210

• '

180

0 I 0 0

"' ISO z 0 .... (,)

j;: u. <. ", a: 120 .... .... :t: >'! w

90 ! I v I ~ 0: u. ~ K

60 ------:30

I l'o1;q

-NciM[-HARBO-- l NoM.t --------

I

---

'.

, , --~-

/ _)-Pi?·c· .. •········ +: ~p , l

... '!To " .•

,,. -""'"---t ;I ,E_E°fROl,;'..UM

--------- -------- -- .. ;.·_ ---...........1 '"' ,./ _____ ,...~_-_-__ -__ -_-_ 1'

!

1961 1962 !963 1964 1965 1966 !967 1968 !969 1970

Figure IV-8

Northwest Alaska Ports - Petroleum Products as a Portion of Total Cargo

~

1--' 1--' \.n

Page 132: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

116

Alaska. The feasibility of upgrading the facilities at St. Michael

has been recently studied for the State of Alaska. The cost of a

barge dock suitable for unloading containers from the barges now serving

6 the Bering Sea ports was estimated at only $35 ,000. This would largely

involve rebuilding of an existing dock.

/ Moving north from St. Michael, the next protected anchorage is at

vf Qolovin Bay which has a channel depth of 13 feet in its entrance. This

is a large roadstead and was recently the site of a fish processing and

freezing facility. ;fhere are no surface connections from Golovin to

other points on the Seward Peninsula.

J The harbor at ~presently consists of a barge-turning basin with

an eight-foot entrance channel. This facility at the mouth of the Snake

River requires annual dredging by the Corps of Engineers to keep it in

operation. The City of Nome has requested a harbor that can acco1U1Uodate

ships of 30- to 35-foot draft be constructed in some suitable location

j close to their city.

for such a port but did suggest that some of the costs could be recovered

A preliminary study did not develop cost estimates

by extracting gold from the materials dredged from the channel and port

Jas. 7 Nome is the center of the peninsular road net.

Port Clarence has long been considered as one of the best candidates

for a deep draft harbor in this area. In a 1968 study, the Coast Guard

estimated that it would require $1,517,000 to dredge the port to a depth

suitable for deep water docking facilities. 8 The entrance channel at

I Port Clarence is 42 feet. Port Clarence is connected to Nome by a road

from the village of Teller which lies on the spit forming its outer

barrier.

Page 133: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

117

Init.ial plans have been developed for a loading facility at ~ / River to serve the fluorite and tin deposits there. The proposed dock

would extend about 5,000 feet directly out from an open beach into

about 40 feet of water. Preliminary surveys indicate that such a dock

is probably feasible and would withstand ice and storm conditions in

9 the area. This site is not connected to the existing Seward Peninsula V/ road net and would require an expensive bridge to connect it directly

to the Teller Road.

There is no possibility for a deep draft port at Kotzebue because

of heavy silting problems. Ships must now anchor ten to twelve miles

out. Plans developed for a water transportation center at the Baldwin

Peninsula are discussed in Chapter v. Until additional

justify new port facilities, the best hope for Kotzebue

cargo flows J lies in the

provision of containerized service to the maximum extent possible

roll-off containers minimize lighterage expense.

At Barrow it is also necessary to lighter all goods except petro-

leum products coming ashore through hoses. Here ships can lie fairly

close inshore but are subject to danger from an onshore movement of the

ever present ice pack. Provision of a deep draft dock or other harbor

facility here seems beyond the bounds of present feasibility. The same

general situation pertains along the entire Arctic Coast, with all pro-

tected anchorages being shallow and having poorly defined entrances.

The harbor at Prudhoe Bay is a good example of this situation sine),/

it is here necessary to unload from the seagoing barges and lighter

freight for six miles with smaller barges to reach the unloading dock.

Although no cost studies are available on the extra costs this entails,

Page 134: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

118

some have estimated that the extra movement added $40 a ton to the

10 landed price at Prudhoe Bay.

The first good protected harbor east of Barrow, Herschel Island, ~

is in Canada. There is a deep water hole off the east side of the

island with a deep water channel to the Arctic Basin via the MacKenzie

Submarine Canyon. This is the only known deep water refuge in the

western Arctic at the present time.

Intraregional Freight

Freight moves in the Northwest Region by shallow-draft river barges

on the Kobuk and Noatak rivers. These rivers are open approximately

four months per year. Traffic on these rivers has varied from 2,000

11 to 5,000 tons in recent years.

There is also intracoastal movement of goods from St. Michael,

Nome and Kotzebue to smaller coastal villages. Large sea-going barges

j tinload in the three towns and smaller barges take over. At present

it is estimated that 30 percent of the cargo landed in Kotzebue, Nome

and St. Michael is sent forward still containerized, but that 70 percent

must be broken up before being forwarded to its destination. This

added amount of handling substantially increases the final cost of the

goods.

Airborne Transportation

The air system which serves Northwest Alaska is of two types:

scheduled service by jetliner linking the larger towns with the rest

of Alaska, and bush service by air taxi tying the regional centers to

Page 135: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

119

smaller villages. During 1968-69, another class of service, contract

freight airlines, carried large cargoes of specialized freight. Generally,

the air service is good for regional centers and sporadic for the smaller

villages.

Air transportation in Northwest Alaska has the advantage of quickness

and the disadvantage of costliness. While high costs are characteristic

of air transport in the Northwest as a whole, freight rates and fares

between Fairbanks, Anchorage and the villages begin to constitute a real

barrier to mobility. Inasmuch as passenger travel into and out of the

Northwest is only possible by air, high fares effectively restrict free

movement.

The other problem for the area is frequency of air service. The

larger places receive daily service, although often at odd hours due to

equipment utilization problems of the regional air carriers. Smaller

villages are usually restricted to two flights a week, and bad weather

will sometimes cause them to go without service for two to three weeks.

Alaska and Wien Airlines have regularly scheduled service to Nome,

Barrow, Kotzebue, Galena and Unalakleet. The air taxi role is vitally

important to bush points because to many villages it is the only trans­

portation means; but in terms of absolute tonnages, it is probably in­

significant. Some indication of the interregional passenger travel can

be seen from Table IV-25. There was a 70 percent increase in passenger

travel between 1966 and 1970.

As pointed out previously, fares are expensive compared to costs

in other states. For example, travel from Anchorage to Nome (a distance

of 550 miles) on a one-way tourist fare costs 11.3 cents per mile,

Page 136: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

120

Table IV-25

Airport Activity Statistics of Certified Route Air Carriers*

Point 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970

(Persons)

Barrow 4 ,682 5,953 5,878 7,834 9'119 Kotzebue 11,254 13,427 15,763 16 '863 24' 825 Nome 15 '786 16 '973 19,917 25,359 21,636 Unalakleet 1,924 2,044 2,249 2,331 1,697

Total 33,646 38 ,39 7 43,807 52 '387 57 ,277

*Data given as "the total number of revenue passengers. boarding air­craft, including originating, stop over, and trans fer ·-p~~sengers in scheduled and nonscheduled services."

Source: Civil Aeronautics Board and Federal Aviation Agency.

whereas to travel similar distances from Minneapolis to Rapid City

costs 6.9 cents per mile, and from Pittsburgh to Boston costs 7.2 cents

12 per mile.

The problems facing the air transport system -- high costs and in-

frequent service -- are an expression of the region's widely dispersed,

undeveloped and fractionated (except for Prudhoe Bay) transportation

needs. It is unlikely that investments in airport and other improvements

or in more modern equipment will bring about reductions in costs. Indeed,

if the classic aviation pattern is followed, such investments would tend

to raise costs to the users. Direct subsidy is probably the most realis-

tic solution to this problem.

Page 137: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

121

i Freight Shipment by Hail

A substantial amount of freight goes into the Northwest Region

as mail. Although no exact records are available for any extended

period, the Anchorage and Fairbanks post offices kept blotter records

of large shipments tended as parcel post from August 1, 1969 through

November 26, 1969 (Anchorage) and from August 1, 1969 to October 30,

1969 (Fairbanks). In Anchorage, the volume of freight sent as parcel

post amounted to 1,394,534 pounds. For Fairbanks, the figure was

434,648 pounds. The breakdown according to sender appears as Appendix B.

According to these figures, approximately 2,100 tons of freight

were sent as mail from Anchorage each year and 800 tons from Fairbanks.

However, it is suspected that these figures cannot be lineally projected

because the sampling was done during summer, when barge shipments were

possible, and inventories would be expected to be at their peak. Total

freight sent as mail would probably be more than the 2,900 tons shown.

Parcel post to the Northwest travels by air on a space available basis.

Parcel post rates are cheaper than air freight rates for large packages.

Sending 100 pounds parcel post from Fairbanks or Anchorage to Nome,

Barrow or Kotzebue costs $6.35. Air freight on Wien Airlines for the

same package from Anchorage to Barrow (most expensive) is $19.96 in-

eluding tax.

The two principal interregional mail carriers are Alaska Airlines

and Wien Consolidated. According to post office records for fiscal

year 1969, Alaska Airlines moved 1,419 ,5 75 pounds of mail in to the

Northwest and brought back 165,584 pounds. Wien moved 6,509,100 pounds

from various points outside of the Northwest into the region and brought

back 651,185 pounds of mail. 13

Page 138: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

122

North Slope Air Cargo

During the 1968-69 rush to explore the North Slope, large volumes

of freight were carried by air. Table IV-26 shows tonnages of air

freight carried by major carriers for 1967-70. The figures shown con-

siderably understate the situation since freight totals are not availa-

ble for short-term enterprises which folded when the demand ceased in

1969 (for example, Arctic Airways of Fairbanks). 14

Table IV-26

Air Freight Carried into Northwest Region by Major Airlines, 1967-70

Company 1967 1968 1969 1970 (Short Tons)

Alaska Airlines Hercules Flightsa 4,560 82 ,080 20,520

(North Slope Totals) Common Air Freight 208 482

Interior Airways, Inc. 4,701 83 ,982 20,684 (North Slope Totals)

Red Dodge n.a. n.·a. n. a.

Reeve Aleutian b 261 521 6,257 1,564

Wien Consolidated c 1,611 1,975 2,816 3,482

Totals 1,872 11,757 175,343 46,732

Notes: ~ercules Flights moved 114,000 tons of freight between March 15, 1968 and August of 1971. Because these flights are on a contract basis and Alaska Airlines could not supply exact figures for each year, the assumption was made that percent changes in yearly volume should be com­parable to Interior Airways, which is also on a contract basis and could supply exact figures. Implicit in the assumpt1.on is that all air contact carriers receive pro­portionate volume of the demand which is open to cri.ticis1n.

Page 139: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

123

bThe same assumption mentioned above was made for Reeve, who could only supply average yearly figures.

cAlthough Wien supplied accurate records of freight movements, the data were identified only as freight coming onboard and being offloaded (on and off movements), and did not break down origin and destination pf shipments. Therefore, the portion of freight moving interregionally and intraregionally had to be estimated. According to Mr. Sorenson, Wien cargo manager in Fairbanks, the off movements at Nome, Kotzebue and Barrow probably represent interregional movement of freight, while the off movements at other points in the Northwest are probably intraregional shipments. Freight coming onboard at Kotzebue, Barrow and Nome could be either freight being back­hauled out of the region entirely, or intraregional freight. Mr. Sorenson stated that small seasonal salmon shipments were the only shipments out of the region, so records of freight coming onboard were not counted as interregional freight.

Sources: Letter from Larry G. Evenson, Director, Contract/Cargo Sales, Alaska Airlines, Seattle, Washington, August 25, 1971; inter­view with Roy Isackson, Interior Airways, Inc., August 1971, Fairbanks, Alaska; letter from Richard D. Reeve, Assistant Vice President, Reeve Aleutian Airways, Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, August 11, 1971; and letter from S.B. Fitzhugh, Vice President - Finance, Wien Consolidated Airlines, Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, September 21, 1971.

Air taxi companies (as opposed to scheduled or contract carriers)

also moved considerable freight to the North Slope. For example, Pan

Alaska and Delaware Air Jet, a subsidiary of Hamilton Oil Company, to-

gether moved approximately 400 tons of freight and 3,134 passengers in

15 1970 to the North Slope. Other air taxis moved freight to the North

Slope, but their records do not distinguish between interregional and

intraregional flights.

It is generally anticipated that if and when oil and gas line

permits are granted there will be another surge of exploration activity

on the North Slope, although still on a comparatively short-lived basis.

Page 140: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

124

The second phase should be less frantic than the first because most

of the promising lands are already under lease. Therefore, air trans-

portation will probably play a smaller re la ti ve role and water trans-

portation, which is cheaper, will assume a relatively greater share of

material movements.

Road Network

There are at present no interregion roads. The winter road (the

Hickel Highway) constructed by the State in 1969 and 1970 has not been

maintained. Only 7,500 tons of freight were sent over this road in the

spring of 1969. In 1970, the total grew to over 19,000 tons but in-

16 eluded rolling stock for construction of the trans-Alaska pipeline.

The road system serving the Seward Peninsula is an outgrowth of

old mining roads. The last major investment by the State was the road

serving Nome, Teller, and the largely abandoned mining camps of the

Peninsula. As pointed out previously, the road system at Prudhoe Bay

only serves the needs of the oil fields in that area. There are no

co,Jnections to other locations.

\./ The State of Alaska still plans to construct a highway to Prudhoe

Bay as part of the trans-Alaska pipeline project with a possible extension

to the Kobuk Valley and ultimately on to Nome.

Page 141: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

125

Footnotes

1. Alaska Industry, Vol. III, No. 11, Alaska Industrial Publications, Inc., Anchorage, November 1971.

2, Alaska Trade Study, Federal Maridme Commission, Bureau of Domestic Regulations, U.S. Government Printing Office, July 1967.

3. Civil Aeronautics Board Hearings, 21238, P.O.D. 201, p. 60.

4. Air transport hauled in freight at a rate of 14,000 tons per month in 1969 which dropped to 4,000 tons per month average in 1970, after 91,000 tons of cargo were unloaded from barges at Prudhoe Bay in the summer of 1969.

5. George C. Sillides, Project Feasibility: Report of a Dock Facility at St. Michael, Alaska, prepared for the Alaska Department of Public Works, Division of Water and Harbors, Fairbanks, January 1971, p. 14.

6. Civil Aeronautics Board Hearings, op. cit.

7. Clarks and Groff, Engineers, Nomeport, A Preliminary Investigation of a Deepwater Harbor at Nome, Alaska, prepared for the City of Nome, Alaska, Salem, Oregon, November 1968, p. 45.

8. United States Department of Transportation, Coast Guard, Polar Trans­portation Requirements Study Report, Vol. II, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968, p. A-78.

9. German and Milne, Fluorite Shipment from Lost River, Alaska, prepared for Lost River Mining Corporation Ltd., Montreal, Quebec, April 1971.

10. Conversation with Geoffrey Larmanie, BP Oil, Alaska, June 1970.

11. Alaska Trade Study, op. cit.

12. Civil Aeronautics Board Hearings, op. cit.

13. Walter B. Parker, High Fares and Low Incomes, Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, March 1970.

14. According to Wien testimony at the Civil Aeronautics Board Hearings in June of 1970, "In order to meet the short-term emergency demand created by the North Slope exploration and to supply the temporary fuel requirements of the drilling rigs, obsolete aircraft from all over the world were placed into service. These included 10 con­stellation 1049-type aircraft, CL-44 swing-tail aircraft and other multi-engine craft especially fitted for the hauling of fuel, in­cluding Hercules-type aircraft,

"During the summer of 1969, hundreds of thousands of tons of cargo were moved to the Slope by barge. These shipments included buildings,

Page 142: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

126

drilling cement and mud and fuel oil. Thus, huge stockpiles were accumulated on the Slope and the airlift requirements were dras­tically curtailed during the winter of 1969 and 1970. As a result, the Hercules aircraft were largely removed from the North Slope market; and the other equipment, purchased by various entrepreneurs and hired on a short-term basis by the oil companies, is now lying idle at various airports throughout the State."

15. Civil Aeronautics Board Hearings, Docket 20826, Exhibit WCA-1001, p. 2; Alaska Transportation Commission, Quarterly Reports of Air Taxi Companies.

16. Federal Aviation Agency, Alaska Plan for the Arctic Region, Anchorage, December 1969.

Page 143: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

CHAPTER V - FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR WATERBORNE TRANSPORTATION

Forecasting

Prospects Until 1980-85

After the 1980's

Page 144: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

128

Forecastin&

A general lack of detailed physical data about the resources of

Northwest Alaska makes any future forecast highly problematical. When

the confusion of political issues, as manifested by the Alaska pipeline

dispute, and the uncertainty of world markets for minerals is inter-

jected into the planning matrix, it becomes difficult to regard fore-

casts as anything more than conjecture.

The forecasts have been divided into two time periods, the first

covering the immediate future up to the period 1980-85 and the second,

or longer range, forecast covering the subsequent period. Forecasts

;6r the first period are

ment now in the planning

based on the commencement of mineral develop-'----..__

stages and continued exploration and develop-

ment of the North Slope oil province. For the distant future, maximum

projections assume continued mineral exploration, mining of the area's

coal or other mineral reserves, and the continued development of oil

including the offshore areas.

Prospects Until 1980-85

Waterl>e>rne-+reight in the next decade will leave the Northwest

Region in the form of ore and concentrate shipments from Lost River

(and other smaller mines on the Seward Peninsula) and Bornite (and

associated developments in the Kobuk). Waterborne freight will enter

the region in the form of general cargo headed for ports on the Seward

Peninsula, the Kobuk Valley, and general and specialized cargo headed

for the Arctic Coast to support oil and gas exploration and develop-

ment.

Page 145: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

129

Cargo Load Levels

Based on current estimates, the ore .shipments from Lost River

will amount to 350,000 tons annually, and the Bornite cargo will be -·---- - --------------,

115,000 tons. Other mines are assumed to contribute up to 100,000

tons annually, with most of the ore likely to originate in the western

half of the Seward Peninsula. Total outbound ore flows from the Seward ~

Peninsula and the Kobuk would then be about 565,000 tons.

Mining activity sufficient to produce 565,000 tons would require

a work force of about 1,000 men. An additional 1,000 new jobs should

be created in support industries and by the increase in tourism.

Unemployment in the region is assumed to be solved or at least

reduced before workers are imported to fill the new jobs. Of the

1,000 new jobs in.mining, 500 are estimated to go to local residents

and 500 to imported labor. The jobs created in support industries and

tourism are also estimated to be split equally between residents and

outside workers. The result is an expectation of 1,000 new workers ----........ moving into the area during the period under consideration. Using a

factor of 3.5 persons per job to calculate total population increase

gives an in-migration total of 3,500 people.

Assuming a moderate rate of natural increase and the present rate

of out-migration from the region, an increase of 3,000 persons by 1980

above and beyond the 3,500 workers and families can be projected. The

population of the two areas, the Seward Peninsula and the Kobuk, would ------·

be about 16 ,500 or a 65 percent increase over the 1970 census figure of

10 ,183.

The population increase, in combination with a general increase in

per capita income brought about by payments to individuals under the

Page 146: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

130

Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and an increased level of local

development, financed by village and regional corporations set up under

the Act, could raise inbound cargo flows to the Seward and Kobuk areas

to near 150,000 tons, or two and-one-half times the present rate.

A total of 150,000 tons of inbound and 565,000 tons of outbound

cargo are thus predicted for the annual freight levels of the Seward

Peninsula and the Kobuk Valley during the next ten years. This total

compares closely with the level of activity of such Southeast Alaska

ports as Wrangell and Skagway.

The only identifiable outbound cargo flow from the North Slope

during this period is the oil and gas production of the Prudhoe Bay

field. It is assumed that this will be shipped through the projected

pipelines and will not be a factor in waterborne commerce as a product.

Inbound cargo to the villages of the Arctic Slope and the remain-

ing DEW Line stations should increase slightly to about 30,000 tons as

the standard of living improves. If the radar stations are phased out,

freight requirements could drop below the present level since fuel oil

for these sites is a major component of present cargo.

Cargo inbound to the North Slope for oil development would average

about 350,000 tons per year if a moderate level of exploration and

development over the entire Slope (including NPR No. 4 but excluding

the Arctic National Wildlife Range) is maintained. If NPR No. 4 is not

opened to private development, this need would be cut to about 200,000

tons unless the Navy instituted a substantial program of its own. A

low level of exploration could cut this requirement to less than 50,000

tom ann~lfy.

Page 147: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

131

Total cargo flows for all three regions of the Northwest would

therefore be somewhere between 795,000 and 1,095,000 tons annually by

1980. The comparison between regions shown in Table V-27 indicates that

the Seward Peninsula is the only area with a good possibility of signi-

ficant amounts of inbound and outbound cargo in the near future.

Port and Other Transport Improvements

The Kobuk Valley could be served by either of two alternative systems.

The first would entail improving the present ,lighteri'!.!L and port facilities -------,-~---."--·--.----"

at Kotzebue to make feasible the transshipment of ore from Bornite; the

other alternative is to extend the Seward Peninsula road system to

--------· Kotzebue and Bornite.

Kotzebue Sound has an average depth of 40 to 60 feet but immediately

adjacent to Kotzebue it shallows so gradually that deep draft ships must

lie eight to ten miles offshore making necessary an expensive and at

times dangerous lightering trip. The approach to Kotzebue through the

entrance to Hotham Inlet is blocked by numerous shoals deposited by the

Noatak River.

It has been estimated that lightering services at Kotzebue account

for one-quarter of the total shipping costs from Seattle. 1 If labor

costs increase as expected when the effect of the Native settlement of

land claims is felt, lightering costs could increase to an even greater

percentage of total costs since at Kotzebue the operation is relatively

labor intensive and has relied upon the depressed wage rates in that

area to maintain its profit margin at current rates. 2

Page 148: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

132

'?

Table V-27

Projections for Waterborne Commerce for Northwestern Alaska until 1980-85

Inbound Outbound Region Cargo Cargo Total

(annual estimates in thousands of tons)

Seward Peninsula Kobuk Valley Chukchi Seacoast Prudhoe Bay Area

Total

100 50

45-195a 35-185

230-530

440 125

565

540 175

45- 195 35- 185

795-1095

Revised estimates if Alaska Railroad is built to Bornite and Prudhoe Bay:

Seward Peninsula Kobuk Valley Chukchi Seacoast Prudhoe Bay Area

Total

Revised estimates

Seward Peninsula Kobuk Valley Chukchi Seacoast Prudhoe Bay Area

Total

Revised estimates

Seward Peninsula Kobuk Valley Chukchi Seacoast Prudhoe Bay Area

Total

100 30

35-125

165-255

if highways

80 20

35-125 15- 75

150-300

if highway

80 20

45-195 35-185

180-480

440

440

are built to Nome and

440 125

565

is built to Nome only:

440 125

565

540 30

35-125

605-695

Prudhoe Bay:

520 145

35-125 15- 75

715-865

520 145

45- 195 35- 185

745-1045

Note: Cargo flows to the Chukchi Seacoast are for the North Slope west of the Colville; for the Prudhoe Bay Area, the North Slope to the east of the Colville. a·

Cargo flow ranges are from Table 11-14 in the section on Oil and Gas, page 61.

Page 149: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

133

The federal Bureau of Land Management has set up

fication unit at the neck of the Baldwin Peninsula in

a proposed classif /

order to reserve//

this area as a possible future water transportation center. There is

deep water much closer inshore at this location and it is much closer

to the main channel of the Kobuk River, thus eliminating most of the

· sometimes dangerous trip across Hotham Inlet that must now be made

from Kotzebue by the barges serving the riverine villages.

The possibility of dredging a deep draft harbor channel at Kotzebue

has previously been rejected by the Corps of Engineers due to the severe

3 silting problems. No feasibility or cost studies have yet been done on

the Baldwin Peninsula site. However, one of the known costs would be a

30-mile road link to Kotzebue. The project could be expanded to include

a barge canal across the neck of the Peninsula and/or a deep draft channel

to allow dockside unloading of deep draft vessels. No cost estimates on

either of these are available. (See Figure V-9, which is a graphic pre-

sentation of the proposals for this area.)

If the Seward Peninsula road system were extended to serve Kotzebue

and an associated water transportation center, about 150 miles of road --·-~-

would be needed to connect K~.ue with the nearest point now served

by road, Taylor. A _ _i;;.i-mple cost comparison between road and port costs ·------

would probably favor the port, but a road could serve more purposes than

freight transport in and out of the region.

Kotzebue Sound is closed by ice for two months longer than the south

shore of the Seward Peninsula and keeping a port on Kotzebue Sound open

the year round would require twice as much icebreaker time. Icebreakers

are estimated to take only five days for a round trip from Saint Lawrence

Page 150: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

134

Island to Port Clarence or Nome, which makes the provision of year-round

icebreaker support to Nome or Port Clarence feasible.4

Appendix C is a

series of charts showing ice conditions on the west coast of Alaska by

month.

The aggregation of both outbound and inbound cargo for the two areas,

the Seward Peninsula and the Kobuk Valley, would make possible the amor-

tization of superior port facilities for handling ore outbound and con-

tainers inbound.

A port Ofl the ~eward Peninaula would need to be located close to the

source of the majQL __ QJ:Lflows that are now imminent. The use of this

port for shipment of Kobuk ores was suggested by the1Coast Guard Polar

Transportation Requirements Study. 5 Reversing the situation and shipping

Seward Peninsula products through a Kotzebue Sound port would mean keep-

ing Kotzebue Sound open to shipping during the ice season at a considerably

higher cost.

The shH_t_ing nature at qil cle.v:el,opment JeCJ,l,!irements, the absence of

major outbound cargo flows, the expense of maintaining year-round service,

and the lack of a good deep draft site, make it unfeasible to consider

a port on the Chukchi or Beaufort seacoasts at this time. Unless there

are more stable cargo flows from the North Slope, the present service of

barges can handle the area with reasonable adequacy.

In conclusion, for the period between the present and the first half

~' f the 1980 decade, the provision of a deep draft port to serve the Seward

eninsula appears feasible provided that the projected ore developments

n Northwest Alaska do occur. This port should be located as close as

possible to the source of the major ore flows and, if possible, should be

Page 151: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

CHUKCHI

SEA

-:1 -~

'j ,·:.

'"i;oc ... ,

NORTON SOUND

. . ·~

·":.:.,_~KIVALINA ...

·C

'!i ~1,

NOATAK

KOYUK

Figure V-9

LEGEND

EXISTING ROADS

---- PROPOSED ROADS TO CONNECT KOTZEBUE AND SORNITE TO THE SEWARD PENINSULA ROAD SYSTEM

•••••••- BARGE ROUTE

-----------------TO 80RNITE

COPPER MINES

Proposed Water/Land Transportation Network - Baldwin Peninsula, Near Kotzebue

'<

..

>-' w \.n

Page 152: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

136

built where it can be connected to the main road network of the Seward

Peninsula with the least cost.

Residents of Nome and other peninsular villages need cheap freight.

A single good port on the Seward Peninsula could probably provide better

and cheaper service than the current combination of offshore anchorage

and lightering at every port, by making it possible to move goods directly

from the port to· the community. When containers can be offloaded directly

from the ships to their trailers, the savings in lighterage fees alone

should substantially reduce total freight costs.

For those areas that would still have to rely upon barge service,

provisions should be made for the deep water port to serve as a trans-

fer point from ships to barges. Fast containerships could then be used

for the greater part of the trip from the U.S. West Coast and other

ports. It would eliminate two of the major problems of the barge opera-

tions -- transit time and the weather dangers of the North Pacific and

the Gulf of Alaska. Even ports to the south, such as Bethel and Dilling-

ham, might be served more cheaply by such a system.

A question that must be examined is how much of the waterborne

freight might be diverted to competing transportation systems during

this period. There are three major possible alternatives to consider:

(1) extension of the Alaska Railroad to the North Slope and Bornite or

to either one; (2) the building of major highway links from the present

main highway net to Nome or to the North Slope or to both; and.(3) the

use of large cargo-carrying aircraft to haul both general and bulk

cargo.

(1) If the Alaska Railroad were extended to Bornite and no road -~·------____,

built from the Kobuk copper mines to the Bering coast, then the ore

Page 153: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

137

would of course travel by rail. However, if both a railroad and road

existed, it might well prove cheaper to haul by truck to a port on the

Bering coast than by rail to a port on the Gulf Coast of Alaska, since

the distance would be less than half as far.

If the Alaska Railroad were extended to the North Slope, almost

all inbound freight except for very bulky items, would switch to a

rail route because it would be available on a year-round basis and

probably would be cheaper. Freight handlers in Anchorage have estimated

that they could put freight down in Prudhoe Bay at $80 a ton from Seattle

6 if the rail line were extended. Waterborne commerce could not compete

with this rate if it were necessary to lighter freight ashore at Prudhoe

Bay, since moving freight by water to Prudhoe Bay from Seattle now costs

between $125-$160 per ton.

The rationale for construction of the railroad to the North Slope

is based upon some movement of oil by train. Alaska Railroad engineers,

in conjunction with specialists on unit train movements from the Southern

Pacific Railroad, have computed that 20 unit trains per day could be moved

over a single track railroad from Prudhoe Bay to Anchorage. Each train

would contain 110 tank cars, each car holding 26,500 gallons of oil.

Each train would thus haul 55,000 barrels or a total of 1.1 million

barrels per day by all trains. The costs of equipment and new high

strength rails for the existing railroads have not been computed as

7 yet. The cost of extending the Alaska Railroad from Nenana to Prudhoe

Bay has been estimated at $436 million. 8

(2) If a highway were extended westward from the proposed pipeline

road to Kobuk, ore from Bornite could be hauled and then transshipped

by railroad. If the road were ext.ended to Nome, the ore could be hauled

Page 154: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

138

directly to a port on the Bering coast. If a highway were built the

whole length of the pipeline route, the chances that truck rates to

Prudhoe Bay would be cheaper than the present marine rate are reasonably

good. Projected median costs from Anchorage would be about $70 per ton

based on eight cents per ton mile costs on a paved highway and nine cents

9 on a gravel road.

(3) Lockheed and Boeing have claimed that their cargo planes can

haul ore or oil at five cents-per ton mile and put freight down at .----------Prudhoe Bay and Nome from Seattle for $100 per ton. However, bulk ore

flows by marine ore carriers would be far under the above rate if suitable

harbor facilities were provided (on the order of $10 to $20 per ton).

Large air freighters could absorb significant amounts of inbound general

cargo from the current transportation network, but not from a rapid large

volume integrated ship/rail/road transportation network.

Inbound cargo to the North Slope will largely move via a railroad

or highway, if one is built, except for extremely large items. The marine

system is simply too limited without massive icebreaker support, and round

trip times of 34 days for icebreakers from St. Lawrence Island to Prudhoe

Bay make the maintenance of year-round service by barges or conventional

shipping to the Arctic Coast prohibitive. 10

After the 1980's

It is impossible to predict when the world will need the great coal

deposits of the North Slope or when tankers may carry oil from offshore

fields in the Chukchi Sea. Such massive shipments of natural resources

may never become a reality, but if they occur will probably be at least

twenty years in the future.

Page 155: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

139

If the coal fields of the North Slope were to supply one-fourth

of Japan's present coal requirements, it would require the mining of

10 million tons per year. This would require about 500 trips from

Alaska to Japan annually using medium-sized ore freighters.

A shipment of 2 million barrels of oil per day from a Prudhoe­

size field off the Northwest Coast would require 1,000 trips per year

by tankers somewhat larger than the "Manhattan" of Northwest Passage

fame. (As pointed out previously, most onshore fields would probably

find it most expedient to ship their oil via the Alaska pipeline; thus

only offshore fields would utilize tankers.)

If both coal and oil were shipped by sea, there would be 1,500

round trips per year of 4.1 trips per day each way. If the tankers

and ore carriers were built to operate as icebreakers, little support

would be needed from a conventional icebreaker for a substantial part

of the year.

There are no suitable natural sites for a deep draft harbor along

the Chukchi Sea coast. Since the oil tankers would be loading from

offshore structures, the central gathering point for the oil fields

would probably serve as a loading terminal.

The situation regarding coal is very different since the cargo

must be handled from shore to ship. The use of slurry pipelines to

get coal to an offshore terminal would seem an ideal solution if salt

water could be used to mix the slurry. If fresh water must be used,

severe problems would arise since the sources of the quantities of

water that would be required are non-existent for most of the year.

Oil might also be considered as a carrier liquid. In any case, some

system that avoids the problems of coastal ice scour and the ice

Page 156: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

140

stresses of the Arctic ice pack must be devised from the shore to the

loading terminal.

Location of offshore terminals as far as possible from the shore

would be a wise course. Large ships operating in the winter ice pack

will need as much manuevering room as possible along these shallow ice-

stressed coasts. For this same reason, the use of narrow harbors con-

structed along the coast would seem to be a poorer expedient than off-

shore terminals. This history of arctic navigation is replete with

instances of small ships being unable to negotiate narrow passages

because of ice pressure. The greater power of the large ships wiil be,

in large part, offset by their inertia and cross section presented to

ice forces in navigating in narrow seas. Oil and coal shipments of the

magnitudes envisioned here could not be delayed for days or weeks while

the ice took its natural course. Therefore, harbor, channel and terminal

design will have to be innovative in design. The ultimate shape for such

a terminal may be composed of several elements: part fixed structure,

part grounded ice island, and part dredged protector islands. However,

this kind of undertaking lies far in the future after markets for Alaska

coal and offshore oil develop.

Since the oil from Prudhoe Bay will travel by pipeline, the Prudhoe

Bay area will not need a deep draft port unless offshore oil fields are

developed off the Arctic Coast that cannot be tied into a pipeline grid.

If tanker carriage of oil from Arctic offshore fields does become a

reality, then the discussion of oil tanker traffic from the Chukchi

Sea offshore production applies as well.

For the Seward Peninsula and the Kobuk Valley, a moderate jncre:_ase ~

in mining activity is possible but the vagaries of the world market make

Page 157: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

141

predictions on a long-range basis extremely hypothetical. At some time

in the future, the resources of these areas will probably be needed, but

when that time will be depends on many variables outside Alaska.

No large cargo flows are envisoned to be generat~---"~_!:her

reindeer or fishing industries in the study area. A maximum herd size ___ ...,._ ..::"·

of 600,000 (estimated to be the largest size population the range can

handle) would produce about 150 ,000 carcasses or

for shipment. A herd of this size would support

10 ,000 tons of meat J! about 550-600 persons 1

as herders and probably an equal number in support and production trades.

Any major development in fisheries will most likely be in the dem-

ersal stocks of the Bering Sea. While potential exists for some <level-

opment by Alaska fishermen, many fisheries biologists in Japan and the

United States feel that these stocks are being fished at close to their

11 limits at present. It is more likely that these stocks would be fishev·

by distant water fleets based on Kodiak or Unalaska than by coastal fish-

ing effort based on the Seward Peninsula.

A moderate level of petroleum exploration and development is pre-

dieted for the 1985-2000 period resulting in the completion of the ex-

ploration phase for most of the North Slope and its adjacent coastal

areas by the end of the Period. No major activity In petroleum is -~·-·----·-- ~--- - --·--

assumed for the Norton Sound or Kotzebue Sound areas. Coal mining and ~

petroleum _ _p_E:>duc_t:ion are increasingly automated and once the exploration

and initial development phases are ended will require only a small labor

force. Table V-28 shows inbound cargo estimates for a population of

27,500. This figure is based on a natural increase of 5,000 and a net

in-migration increase of 6,000 people, and builds on the development

levels presumed to have occurred between 1970-85.

Page 158: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Region

142

Table V-28

Projections for Waterborne Commerce for Northwestern Alaska, 1985-2000

Inbound Outbound Cargo Cargo Total

(annual estimates in thousands of tons)

Seward Peninsula Kobuk Valley Chukchi Seacoast Prudhoe Bay Area

Total

200 100 175 175

650

550 750 250 350

172 ,425a 172 ,600 (162,425)b 175

173,225 173,875 (335 ,650) (336,47S)

Revised estimates if Alaska Railroad is extended to Bornite and Prudhoe:

Seward Peninsula 200 5SO 7SO Kobuk Valley so so 100 Chukchi Seacoast 125 172,425 172 ,sso Prudhoe Bay Area (162 ,42S)

Total 37S 173,025 173,400 (335 ,4SO) (33S, 82S)

(162 ,600)

(162,425)

Revised estimates if highways are built to Nome and Prudhoe Bay:

Seward Peninsula 150 S2S 675 Kobuk Valley so lSO 200 Chukchi Seacoast 150 172,425 172 ,S75 Prudhoe Bay Area 7S (162 ,425) 7S

Total 425 173 ,100 173,525 (33S,52S) (336,025)

Notes: a Includes 10 milliun tons of coal shipments, the rest is petroleum.

bWill be shipped by waterborne commerce if not feasible to ship via established pipelines from the Prudhoe Bay area.

(162,500)

Page 159: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

143

By the turn of the century, a highway system is likely to be ex-

tended to the Seward Peninsula and the North Slope. Extension of a

highway to the Barrow-Point Lay area is not assumed, however. If the

Alaska Railroad has not been extended to Bornite and/or the North Slope

by 1985, it will probably not be built before the end of the century

since roads or other competing systems will have become well established.

However, estimates of the railroad extension's effect on waterborne

commerce are included on the assumption it will be built by 1985.

During this period, large cargo-carrying aircraft and air cushion I .

vehicles may capture a large part of the general cargo market but should -~·-·~--~--

have little effect upon bulk cargo flows from established ports. Air

cushion vehicles may be marketed in the next twenty years to serve as

lighterage vehicles, since they can provide ship-to-door service.

Air cushion vehicles also may play an important role in hauling

ores from small-scale mining operations to established ports. If small

ore bodies that are far from established transportation systems are ever

to be developed in the Arctic, it will probably require the type of

innovation that allows development with minimum costs for infrastructure

and environmental damage. In this respect, the off-road vehicle develop-

ments may accelerate, rather than compete with, marine waterborne commerce.

Lastly, in sight near the year 2000 is the possibility of ocean-going air

cushion vehicles as large volume cargo haulers.

jC In summary, large-scale waterborne commerce for Northwest Alaska

will be dependent primarily upon development of markets for its coal

and mineral resources and upon the development of offshore oil fields.

Page 160: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

144

Footnotes

1. Federal Maritine Commission, Alaska Trade Study, Washington, D.C., March 1967, p. V-4.

2. Based on information received in interview with Edith Bullock on October 14, 1971.

3. Alaska State Housing Authority, Kotzebue Comprehensive Development Plan, Anchorage, March 1971, p. 41.

4. Coast Guard, Polar Transportation Requirements Study, Vol. II, Washington, D.C., November 1968, p. A-69-70.

5. Ibid.

6. Interview with George Hutton of Alaska Hydrotrain, May 1970.

7. Interview with Cliff Fuglestad, Alaska Railroad, November 11, 1971.

8. Tudor, Kelly, Shannon Consultants, Third Interim Report, Alaska Transportation Corridor Study, a report to the Department of Transportation, February 1971.

9. Median cost used in western Canada and Alaska as obtained from various trucking firms.

10. Coast Guard, op. cit.

11. Washington Law Review, North Pacific Fisheries Symposium, Seattle, October 1967.

Page 161: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

APPENDIX A - FREIGHT TRAFFIC

Nome Harbor

Bering Sea Port

Yukon River

Page 162: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Appendix Table A-1

Freight Traffic, Nome Harbor

--Total Short Tons

Co!!l!!lodity 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970

Meat and Products, Fresh, Frozen 24? 240 180 152 77 88 46 59 53 Meat and Products, NEC* 16 22 14 16 23 17 11 9 Animal Oils and Fats, Edible 18 Animals and Products, NEC 1 1 Condensed and Evaporated Milk 196 30 128 42 Dried YJ.lk 8 Dairy Products 1 NEC 24 28 15 14 14 11 9 6 Fish and Fish Products, Fresh 4 Fish and Fish Products, Canned 372 388 Eggs a=id Egg Products 2 ,....

" Wheat Flour and Semolina 152 162 140 8 "' Grain Mill Products, NEC 42 7 1 4 6 Animal Feeds, NEC 2 Hay a'1d Fodder 5 Vegetables a.'l.d Prep, Fresh, Frozen 176 142 74 80 111 101 93 63 76 49 Fruits c:.nd Prep, Fresh 80 28 16 78 29 36 25 11 25 26 Table Beverage Materials, NEC 22 19 Sugar 100 42 60 12 Molasses, Sugar Prod., Edible 36 8 Alcoholic Beverages 640 810 540 676 209 247 238 64 215 472 Beverages and Syrups, NEC 134 26 96 14 109 109 Groceries and Hise. Food, NEC 1,648 2,362 1, 708 3,676 1,162 1,112 1,097 1,019 1,154 1,860 Rubber and Misc. Plastic Products 22 44 14 25 15 3 6 3 Tobacco Leaf ar.d Manufactures 8 2 2 16 13 10 6 1 Cotton Manufactures 2 Burlap and Jute Bagging 2 Textile Products, NEC 58 4 1 5 4 2 2 2 Timber, Posts, Poles, and Piling 78 98 145 73 180 4 6 1 Lumber and Shingles 1,210 378 1,030 2,044 245 86 48 206 431 1,531 Plywood, Veneers, Cont. Mat. 286 212 456 536 244 56 132 69 250 609 Wood Manufactures, NEC 136 146 122 352 158 52 61 125 41 261 *Not Elsewhere Classified

c L , - ~- .·.

---- ---·------- - ------- • > ----- -

Page 163: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

~ _, ·7 ,. , . ...__._ ·----- ., r-·r---·

Appendix Table A-1 (continued) Freight Traffic, Nome Harbor

Total Short Tons Commodity 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 ---Furniture and Fixtures 214 452 111 112 85 43 Plastic Material l l Paper and Mfgs., NEC 70 100 110 33 9 9 15 18 Bituminous Coal and Lignite 126 100 110 50 30 48 30 20 22 15 Liquefied petroleum gases 384 532 575 326 305 105 Gasoline 6,032 13 ,582 4,716 8,576 4,898 8,445 7,801 5,027 2,115 2, 951 Diseillate Fuel Oil 14 ,588 16 ,144 27 ,230 22,330 12 ,845 21,592 14,677 23 ,572 15 ,412 9 ,247 Jet Fuel, All Types 1,998 2,902 1,438 1,148 Kerosene 26 24 48 48 4,197 2,293 1,469 2,800 2, 775 Asphalt Building Mate-rials 97 Petroleum Asphalt 176 106 292 118 Aliphatic Naphtha 16 28 Lubricating Oils and Greases 226 600 314 172 29 202 434 178 ,.... Petroleum Products, ~EC 500· 384 76 1,134 1,873 "09 269 234 1 233 . _.,_ Building Cement 184 60 708 1,178 143 53 79 182 447 319 " Stone and Mfrs., NEC 8 2 46 30 13 Glass and Glass Products 8 2 Brick and Tile 8 144 Salt 10 17 28 11 6 2 2 Sand, Gravel, Crushed Rock 6 286 98 78 152 Nonmetallic Minerala, Mfrs., NEC 256 132 380 74 356 6~ 162 163 34 270 Iron and Steel Scrap 42 18 4 32 14 15 12 6 Iron and Steel Piµe 74 44 132 222 139 Iron and Steel Bars 208 Iron and Steel Plate 22 2 Tools and Basic Hardware 738 24 4 120 64 5 Rolled, Finished Stl. Mill. Prod. 104 138 280 498 38 17 9 Xetal Mfrs. a.~d Parts, NEC 612 326 444 698 411 377 374 Copper Semifabricated Forms 24 40 Zinc Forms 84 Nonfer. Ores, Metals, Scrap, NEC 54 26 30 84 53 24 l Electrical ~achi~ery 72 22 186 6 39 24 18 15 16 25

'· ..;

Page 164: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Appendix Table A-1 (continued) Freight Traffic, Nome Harbor

Total Short Tons Commodity 1961 1962 1963 1964 1S65 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970

Machinery, except electrical 506 1,226 108 1,026 1,153 1,093 343 614 454 301 Motor Vehicles and Parts 228 158 224 310 115 126 63 155 116 126 Watercraft and Parts 338 19 131 9 21 Aircraft and Parts 20 1 3 Vehicles and rarts, NEG 180 27 8 4 13 116 Misc. Mgf. Products 1,436 6,359 2 5 5 Fabricated Metal Products 394 483 196 Instrt.mlents, photographic and optical 15

goods, -,.atches and clocks Crude and Refined Coal Tar 2 Medicines and Preparations 8 6 Alcohols 6 Industrial Chemicals, NEC 140 90 526 32 Chemical Specialties, NEC 70 22 14 41 Pigments, Paints, Varnishes 48 32 30 31 ~

Miscellaneo"US Chemical Prod. 8 4 16 .... Com!llodities, NEC 4,466 1,032 4,044 5,080 1,222 957 16,279 6,820 1,208 2,124 °" --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --

Totals 36,676 42,224 46,330 51, 720 28,197 47,047 45,357 41,221 26,272 24,568

Source: Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers

\. /

- . --·-·---= .. ==-.o~-~-~----

Page 165: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Appendix Table A-2

Bering Sea Port, Nunivak Island to Demarcation Point, Freight Traffic

Commodity

Heat and Products. Fresh, Chilled, Frozen

Meat and Products, Prep •• Canned M~~t ~nd Products, NEC An!~al Oils and Fnts, Edible Condensed and Evaporated Milk Dried Milk Dairy Products, NEC Fish and Products, Fresh Fish and Produ<:ts, Prepared F!sh and Products, NEC Eggs .:md Egg Products Hides and Skins, Rav Leather and }!.fi:s. Animal Products, Inedible, NEC Corn \.'heat Flour Flour, Flour-Grain Prep, NEC Ani1118l Feeds, NEC Vegetables, Fresh, Fro:z:en Ft"Uits and Prep, Fresh Fruits and Prep, Dried Fruit Juices Nuts and Prep Vegetable Oil, Fats, Edible Table Beverage Materials, NEC Sugar Molasses, Sugar Prod.,' Edible Li<;uors and t.'ines Beverages and Syrups, NEC Groceries and Food, ?-.'EC Rubb.ir a:id ~lisc. Pl.3stic Products Naval Stores, Gums and Resin'5 Tobacco ~!ar.ufactures Cotton Manufactures Vegetable Fiber M.frs., NEC Wool t'm:::.:t.'lufaccures Textile Products, ~EC !icl>er, Posts, Poles, a.'ld Pilings L_u=ber a.'ld Shi:igles Pl;.~.:ood, Veneers, Cone. Hat. Wood Y.a.~.ufactures, NEC Furniture and Fixtures Paper and ~[frs .• NEC Pulp, paper and pa~erboard, NEC Printed Matter · Plastic Materials Bitu::Unous Coal a.~d Lignite Gasoli:ie Gas Oil, Di~tillate Fuel Oil Jet Fuel, All Types Kerosene Residual Fuel Oil Asphalt Pro~ucts Aliphatic Naptha Lubricating Oils and Greases Petroleum and Cosl Produces, NEC BuilC.ing Ce:::ient Stone ~!f?;S •• 'l1"EC Glass a.'ld Glass Products

1961

9S

15

9 289

l 33

139 1,346

322 3 2 4 2 4

3ll 65 25 59 37 10

34 35

123 21

146 108

1,912 3 2

10 7 8

39 llO

2,035 387 132

100

187 3,276 8,788

49 7

1,299 l

3ll 5,357

827 2 l

1962

139

6 2 ll

151

118 176

1,073 265

2

200 27 40 31 l9 l l 2 6

38 74 5

199 64

1,653 3

6 l

38 3

152 1,073

246 l5

96

167 2,191 7 ,755

568 28

338 40

530 24

457 46

5

1963

16

2

253

249 1,747

441

183

42 23

3

ll5

218 72

1,895 34

8

10 1,124

253 135

" 91

1,785 9,335

288 59

2 3

270 6,384

108 330

2

1964

92

4 10

140

4l 20

1,690 390

2

146 29 6

28 22

83

198 96

1,542 18

14

109 1,131

326 103

103

72 4,356

25,068 272 160

1,172 112

3 399

1,233 1,341

98 4

Total Short Tons 1965 1966

:i

4

4

804

l

5

29 10

93 1,703

4

12

2 213 378 110 139

74 34

60 4,032

30 ,997

147

200 2,068

42

9

4

' 1,673 1,060

7

" 12

70 94

2,708 2

6

4 140 673

85 73 63

' l

37 2,122

10 ,59"3

1,353

9,323 ,.

1967

6

2 1

5 154

2,120

37 6

2,415

6

4 328 275

68 3, 720

63 84

ll7

30 7 ,084

24 ,264

1,245

4,015

802 38

3

1968

5

2

' 34 749

8

26 6

1,627 l

3

3 4

556 55 77 90

9 30

27 3,071

10 ,658

681

216 1,830

62

1969

4

557 1,335

34 6

3

2,183 15

l

4 2,826 8,297

567 839 130

25

50 25

7,784 55 ,716

3,414 726 719 274

422 1,217

12,957

1970

52

158 750

2 1

Z,057 1

2 32

5,525 2'7 963

26

39 6,889

59,717 3, 3 78 2. 701

85 7 ,798

33

.... ~

"'

Page 166: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Appendix Table A-2 (continued)

Bering Sea Port, Nunivak Island to Demarcation Point, Freight Traffic

Total Short tons C~odity 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970

Salt 49 31 42 • 18 lB ll5 265 3,000 30 Clay, CerSl!lic and Refractory Mater. 4,642 2,481 Sane:!, Gravel, Crushed Rock 278 l 71 194 '" " 13 Nonoetallic Minerals, Mfrs., NEC lJB 177 409 176 201 126 113 l4B 15,137 901 lron and Steel Scrap and Nonferrous l 1 6

Scr.:ip tools and Basic Hardware 166 " 96 Kitchen and Hospital Utensils 3 lron and Steel Pipe 110 " l4 3 6 1,622 82,044 !t"on '1nd $t('cl B;\rS 6 607 63 Rolled, finished Stl. Mill Prod. 462 92 141 941 6 l is ~!eta!. Hfrs. and Parts, NEC 1,221 440 226 336 A.luoinUl!l Metal and Alloys 6 C<'rrE'r Scmif;"<bricated Forms 77 9 6 • Liqu..-th,J Pctroleu~ Gases >40 592 965 11 • Iror. and Steel Plate 1 19 Fabricated Metal Products 251 94 200 303 17 ,239 405 th,nferr<lus ~ktul Ores 11 Alu:::iinllt:I. 12 Slag 962 Littte 3 Structural Clay 3 Electric;\l H,"\Chinecy 146 173 " 24 23 ll 2l 26 133 29 ~\ac.hinery, except electrical 9.374 703 1,977 S,436 301 196 2,525 1,202 2,538 8,838 ,_. 11\:'tor \'ehicles and Parts 4.16 ~95 200 215 95 13 6 ' 467 "" "' \'ehicles and Parts, NEC 9 l 21 1 20 10 366 40 0

~atercraft and Parts 74 16 174 6 29 25 2 Medicines and Prep. 2 l Sulphuric Ac.i.d 1 Alcohols 10 17 l 31 Sodium Hydroxide 177 Icdustrial Chemicals 114 57 128 217 Basic Cle-:nicals 231 Che~icals, Special 113 112 .. 29 2 Paints, Varnishes, and Allied Prod. 42 43 1 19 5 Misc.. Chemical Products 9 1 14 139 385 Cct!!::!odities, NEC 7,343 9,165 ·13,574 18,756 3,553 10,571 7,794 8,975 15.,612 31,602 1-'ater 26 Misc. Prod. of Mfgr. 6,905 725 9 4 145 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Totals 48,235 29,621 42,393 64,912 53,181 42,991 58 .. 737 31,607 162,729 217,799

Source: Departw.ent of the At'f!IY, Corps of Engineers

~-- --··-·--~·--------....,_. ___ ·-----

Page 167: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Appendix Table A-3

Freight Traffic, Yukon River

Total Short Tons Co~.t!.:y 1961 1962 1963 1964 1%5 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970

Mea:: and Product!!, Fresh l 31 26 Meat nr.d Products, NEC l Fish a:id Products, Fresh 703 268 829 660 4'1 603 697 416 1.057 Fish and Products, Prepared 1,602 47' 760 675 919 863 428 Fish and Products, NEC 486 223 792 \

0egetables, Fresh, Frozen 2 30 26 Fruits and Prep., Fresh, Canned l 25 Liquors a:1d Wines 7 4 61 Groceries and Food, NEC 2,454 1,737 305 1,003 1,410 1,045 832 1,597 1,156 Logs 7,930 13 Ti~~er, rosts, roles and Pilings 12 ~ood, No~~anufactured, NEC 36 Lul:lber .md Shingles 654 338 168 534 369 279 104 641 304 Plywood, \'encers, Cont,· Mat. 30 13 Wood Xanufactures, NEC 18 16 57 108 300 255 Paper and Mfrs., NEC 170 10 Printed ~latter 99 G.1~0U.nc 622 299 19 742 828 '" 620 258 Gas Oil, Distillate Fuel Oil 869 461 4,651 784 865 2,727 80 Lubric~ting Oils and Greases 2 Petroleu:::i Produces, NEC 45,100 34,031 25 .197 26,839 28,246 27 ,983 24,244 23 ,515 32,084 Aspli'1lt PC"oJucts 145 f-' .Building Cement 742 45 33 53 51 99 95 l.n Stone .md Mfrs., NEC sa-0 272 147 •96 f-' ~onrnetallic Minerals, Mfrs., NEC 590 272 150 500 398 187 103 302 251 Alcohols 239 99 286 Tools and B~sic Hardware 604 181 Ii:on and Steel Bars 165 Iron and Steel Pipe 136 70

Metal l'!'.fC"s. and Psrts, NEC 1,816 157 130 452 Electrical Machinel:"y 4 Machinery, except electrical 2,500 418 633 312 62 14 701 178 387 Motor Vehicles and Parts 178 282 166 568 79 136 253 117 140 Vehicles and Parts, NEC 68 Jet Fuel, All Types 161 Salt " Fa::iricated Metal Products 10 241 143 Lio;;uified Petrolelllll. BS !ndustri'11 Chemicals, NEC !SB 33 99 Mis..:elluneous Chemical Products 5 112 Coi:w.odities, NEC 7,998 676 4,111 S,932 3,226 2,814 1,882 2,667 2,667 Struc':;ural Clay 18 Miscellaneous Products of Mfr. 156 92 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Totals 68,082 39,604 32,489 44,138 - 45,414 35,886 29,692 34,325 39,430

Source: Department of the kt:1trJ, Corps of E?J.gineers

Note: Individ~al commodities may not coincide exactly with publiahed reports by the Corps of Engineers due to the fact that in 1965 various CQmm.cdities vere re~lassified. However, total tonnages remain the same.

Page 168: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

APPENDIX B - FREIGHT SENT VIA PARCEL POST

Fairbanks and Anchorage Post Offices

I I

I I '

Page 169: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

August

1

4

6

7

8

9

12

13

15

18

21

25

27

28

29

151

Appendix Table B-1

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Fairbanks Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

Source Destination

West Coast Groc. - Tacoma Shontz-Barrow Alaska Beverage - FAI various

West Coast Groc. - Tacoma various

ANICA - Seattle various

ANICA - Seattle various

ANICA - Seattle various

ANICA - Seattle various

Time-Newsweek various

Alaska Beverage - FAI various Shontz-Barrow

ANICA various

ANICA various Quality Meats - FAI various

West Coast Groc. Tacoma various

West Coast Groc. - Tacoma Barrow

Alaska Beverage - FAI Barrow

ANICA various

Ken Jernstrom Co. - FAI Anaktuvuk Market Basket - FAI various

ANICA various

Estimated Weight

21,000 3,000

3,000

15,000

14,860

4,319

4,600

1,005

12,000 5,000 3,500

2,833 4,700

5,000

5,000

11,250

5,000

2,300 4,000

5,300

Page 170: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

September

3

4

5

8

9

10

11

12

13

16

17

22

23

24

27

29

154

Appendix Table B-1 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Fairbanks Post Off ice for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1 1 1

1 1

1 1

1

1 1

1 1 1

Source

A & W Wholesale FAI Alaska Beverage - FAI

ANICA

West Coast Groc. - Tacoma

Alaska Beverage - FAI

A & W Wholesale - FAI

Alaska Beverage - FAI

Quality Meat - FAI

ANICA Market Basket-- FAI

A & W Wholesale - FAI A & W Wholesale - FAI

Market Basket - FAI West Coast Groc. - Tacoma

A & W Wholesale - FAI

Alaska Beverage - FAI West Coast Groc. - Tacoma

A & W Wholesale - FAI West Coast Groc. - Tacoma ANICA

A & W Wholesale - FAI Fairbanks News - FAI

Ken Grimes - FAI Alaska Beverage - FAI

Quality Meats - FAI

Lindy's Grocery - FAI Lynden's - SEA - SR 98010

A & W Wholesale - FAI Fairbanks News - FAI Alaska Beverage - FAI

Destination

various Barrow Kotzebue Ft. Yukon various

various

various

various

Shontz - Barrow Ft. Yukon Kobuk various

various various

Huslia & Nulato various

various Barrow

Barrow

Barrow Barrow

various various various

various Kotzebue various

various Barrow

various

various various

various various Barrow

Estimated Weight

1,200 6,500 1,600 1,400 6,150

4,000

4,400

2,032

4,500 2,200

550 2,854

3,890 1,180

2,000 1,080

1,450 8,000

1,000

6,600 42, 500

1,350 2,500

14,093

1,200 1,000 1,459

5,058 9,000

2,950

1,300 34,860

1,470 2,175 7,550

Page 171: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

October 1

4

6

7

11

12

13

14

16

18

21

22

23

24

25

155

Appendix Table B-1 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Fairbanks Post Off ice for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

l 1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1

1

1

1

1 1

1 1

Source

B. I.A. - FAI Santa's Bakeries - FAI

A & W Wholesale - FAI Lindy's Groc. - FAI

Fairbanks News A & W Wholesale Market Basket Quality Meat Lindy's Grocery

Alaska Beverage - FAI Santa's Bakeries - FAI

A & W Wholesale - FAI

ANICA

West Coast - Tacoma

Santa's Bakeries - FAI Market Basket - FAI

ANICA Alaska Beverage - FAI

Destination

Barrow various

various various

various various Wainright various various

Barrow various

various

various

Ambler Barrow various various

various Barrow

Barrow

Estimated Weight

965 1,120

2,000 1,780

1,700 1,300

150 640 515

8,500 1,080

1,867

6,220

2,000 1,000 1,200 1,130

8,000 8,800

1 1

A & W Wholesale - FAI Market Basket - FAI Venitie & Pt. Hope

1,130 1,200

1 1

1

1 1 1

1

1

1

A & W Wholesale - FAI Lindy's - FAI

ANICA

Quality Meat - FAI Santa's - FAI Alaska Beverage - FAI

Santa's - FAI

A & W Wholesale - FAI

A & W Wholesale

various various

Point Hope

various various Barrow Ft. Yukon

various

various

various

1,335 1,870

2,200

1,600 1,350 8,000

900

1,500

1,550

1,265

Page 172: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

156

Appendix Table B-1 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail . at Fairbanks Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

Source Destination

October (Continued)

27

28

29

30

31

1 1 1 1 l

1 1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

ANICA A & W Wholesale Quality Meats SanFair (Bakery) Lindy's

A & W Wholesale Alaska Beverage Lindy's

ANICA Quality Meats A & W Wholesale Market Basket Lindy's

A & W Wholesale Sanfair (Bakery) Quality Meats Market Basket Lindy's

A & W Wholesale Lindy's Sanfair (Bakery) Market Basket

various various various various various

various Barrow various

various various various various various

various Barrow various various various

various various various Anuktuvuk Pass

Estimated Weight

1,944 1,700

500 500 514

700 6,600

300

7,000 500

1,300 400 585

900 315 300

1,000 375

1,500 1,230

150 750

Page 173: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

August

1

4

5

6

8

11

12

13

157

Appendix Table B-2

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1

2 2

1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1

Source

Interior Shipping - ANC

Sunrise Bread - ANC Anch. Cold Storage - ANC Grocers Wholesale - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC V. F. Grace - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC

Produce Wholesale ANC V. F. Grace - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC State of Alaska School-ANG

Sunrise Bakery - ANC

Anch. Cold Storage - ANC Anch. Cold Storage - ANC Grocers Wholesale - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Grocers Wholesale - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC Pepsi-Cola Bottling - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC

ANICA Interior Shipping - ANG

Sunrise Bakery - ANG Produce Wholesale - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC V. F. Grace, Inc. - ANG

Grocers Wholesale ANC Pepsi-Cola - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANG

Destination

P. T. Albert, Tununak, Ak

Balance-various various various various various

various various various

various various various various Ft. Yukon McGrath various

various various various Swanson Bros. Store, Bethel

various various various various various various various various

various various

various various

various various

various various various various

Estimated Weight

1,400 700

3,000 2,000 3,000 8,000

4,000 2,500 3,800

3,000 2,500 1,600 6,500 2,000 2,500 3,200

5,000 10,650 26,000

3,600 5,000 5,000 3,200 2,800

11,000 1,200 3,000 2,000

3,500 2,000

4,000 5,000

4,000 4,000

35,000 10,000

3,600 5,000

Page 174: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

J-5 B

Appendix Table B-2 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Off ice for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

Source Destination Estimated Weight

August (Continued)

14

15

18

19

20

21

22

23

26

1 1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 2 1 1 1 1

1

1 1

1 1 1

1

1

1 1 1 1 2

2

Northern Commercial - ANC various Interior Shipping - ANC various Produce Wholesale - ANC various

Sunrise Bakery - ANC Anchorage Cold Storage Grocers Wholesale - ANC Northwest Janitor Supply-

Alaska State School, ANC

B. I.A. - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC V. F. Grace - ANC A. L. French Co. - ANC A. L. French Co. - ANC

Anchorage Cold Storage Sunrise Bakery - ANC Grocers Wholesale - ANC Alaska State School - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC

A. L. French - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC Frigid Fruit & Gro. -ANC

Pepsi-Cola Bottling - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC

Grocers Wholesale - ANC

Grocers Wholesale - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC Grocers Wholesale - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC Pepsi Cola Bottling - ANC Prairie Market - ANC

Interior Shipping - ANC

various various various

various

various various various various various

various various various various various Andy Charlie, Tununak, Ak

Balance-various various

various various

St. Mary's Mission various various

various

various

various various various Emmonak, Ak Naknek, Ak and Ft. Yukon, Ak

various

3,000 4,000 6,000

2,000 3,000 2,500

6,000

10,000 6,000 3,000 6,000 4,286

2,500 4,200

25,000 6,000 6,000

2,260 1,540 5,520

2,000 2,500

1,985 2,500 3,465

2,200

25,000

5,000 15,000

5,000 1,475

2,400 3,000

Page 175: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

J.59

Appendix Table B-2 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

Source Destination Estimated Weight

August (Continued)

27

September

2

3

4

5

8

9

10

11

12

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1

1

3

2 3

2

3 2

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 2 1

1

1 1 2

Produce Wholesale Grocers Wholesale V. F. Grace, Inc. Anch. Cold Storage Alaska State

ANC ANC ANC

- ANC

School District - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Alaska Fish & Farm - ANC A. L. French - ANC

Pepsi Cola - ANC

Interior Shipping - ANC

Pepsi Cola Co. - ANC Pacific Fruit

& Produce - ANC Family Market - ANC

Pepsi Cola - ANC Interior Shipping - ANC

Alaska Fish & Farm - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Anc. Cold Storage - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC

U.S. Weather Bureau ANC Knott Company - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Alaska Cold Storage-ANG Interior Shipping -ANC Pepsi Cola - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC v. F. Grace - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC

Produce Wholesale - ANC Grocery Wholesale - ANC Pepsi Cola Co. - ANC

various various various various

various various various various

various

various

Kotzebue & Aniak

various various

St. Mary's Nondalton

various various various various

various Bethel various various various Kotzebue & ANiak various

various various various

various

various various Emmonak

11,000 20,000 1,400 7,500

5,000 4,000 1,225 1,168

1,500

3,500

1,100

1,590 1,200

2,500 1,515

1,575 4,000

12,000 3,500

4,500 4,000 5,000 1,500 1,850 1,650

10,000

2,100 1,500 1,150

5,000

10,000 12,000

1,550

Page 176: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

160

Appendix Table B-2 (continued)

.Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

Source Destination

September (Continued)

15

16

17

18

19

22

23

24

25

26

29

1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1

2 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 2

3 1 2 1 1 1

3 3

2 2 1

1 1

1

Sunrise Bakery - ANG various Grocer's Wholesale - ANG various

Northern Commercial - ANG Nome & Bethel ANICA various Sunrise Bakery - ANG various Produce Wholesale - ANG various Interior Shipping - ANG various

Grocer's Wholesale - ANG Northern Commercial - ANG Sunrise Bakery - ANG State of Alaska Schools Produce Wholesale - ANG

Sunrise Bakery - ANG Produce Wholesale - ANG

Interior Shipping - ANG Sunrise Bakery - ANG Grocers Wholesale - ANG

Anch. Cold Storage - ANG Northern Commercial - ANG Grocers Wholesale - ANG Sunrise Bakery - ANG Produce Wholesale - ANG

Sunrise Bakery - ANG Produce Wholesale - ANG Interior Shipping - ANG

Pepsi Cola - ANG V. F. Grace - ANG Interior Shipping - ANG Sunrise Bakery - ANG Produce Wholesale - ANG Grocers Wholesale - ANG

Odom Covey Co. - ANG Interior Shipping - ANG

various various various various Bethel

various various

various various various

various various various various various

various various Nome

Kaltag various various various various various

Holy Cross various

A. L. French - ANG various Interior Shipping - ANG various Anch. Cold Storage - ANG various

Sunrise Bakery - ANG various Grocer's Wholesale - ANG various Produce Wholesale - ANG various

Estimated Weight

3,500 12,000

4,100 8,539 3,000 4,500 1,750

11,500 7,917 2,500 3,600 2,800

2,600 4,000

1,650 2,700

30,000

7,150 1,587

31,700 2,500 3,000

2,400 2,200 1,800

1, 750 1,560 1,590 7,500 3,600

35,000

2,600 1,790

1,550 1,760 4,500

3,500 8,500 3,600

! I

Page 177: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

October

1

2

3

6

7

8

9

13

14

15

16

17

20

161

Appendix Table B-2 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

1

2 1

2

2

2

2 1

2

2

1

2 2 1 1 1 1

1 1 3 1

3 1 1

2 1 1 1 1

3 1 1 1 1

Source

Sunrise Bakery - ANG

Interior Shipping - ANG V. F. Grace - ANG

Pepsi Cola - ANG

V. F. Grace ANG

V. F. Grace - ANG

Fish Farm & Fur - ANG V. F. Grace - ANG

V. F. Grace - ANG

Pepsi Cola - ANG

Interior Shipping - ANG

Alaska Fish & Farm - ANG A. L. French - ANG Sunrise Bakery - ANG N. C. Co. - ANG Anch. Cold Storage - ANG Frigid Fruit - ANG

Grocers Wholesale - ANG Sunrise Bakery - ANG Sealand - SEA - SR 98010 N.C. Co. - ANG

Interior Shipping - ANG Sunrise Bakery - ANG Knott Co. - ANG

Pepsi Cola - ANG N.C. Co. - ANG ANICA Sunrise Bakery - ANG Grocers Wholesale - ANG

Interior Shipping - ANG Anchorage Cold Storage Sunrise Bakery - ANG Grocers Wholesale - ANG Produce Wholesale - ANG

Destination

various

various various

St. Mary's & Kotzebue

various

various

Kalskag various

various

Kotzebue

various

various various various various various various

various various various various

Nondalton various various

St. Mary's various various various various

various various various various various

Estimated Weight

3,100

1,550 950

950 1,500

1,050

1,750 900

1,700

1,550

750

800 800

2,000 3,000

20,000 3,000

25,000 2,500

65,100 4,000

1,500 2,100 2,000

1,500 5 ,010 2,000 2,200

35,000

1,700 5,500 3,000

20,000 1,400

Page 178: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

162

Appendix Table B-2 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Date Number of Estimated Rec'd Trailers Source Destination Weight or Trucks

October (Continued)

21 1 Interior Shipping - ANC various 700 1 Knott Company - ANC Bethel 2,400 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 3,500 1 Produce Wholesale - ANC various 5,500 ...

22 1 Anchorage Cold Storage various 5,500 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 2,200 1 Produce Wholesale - ANC various 5,600

23 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 3,600 1 Grocers Wholesale - ANC various 39,000

24 1 V. F. Grace - ANC various 500 1 Interior Shipping - ANC various 750

27 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 2,200 1 Grocer's Wholesale - ANC various 25,000

28 1 Grocers Wholesale - ANC various 25,000

29 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 3,400 1 ANICA various 1,608 1 Produce Wholesale - ANC Bethel 4,500

various 1,000

30 1 Grocers Wholesale - ANC various 25,000 1 Produce Wholesale - ANC various 2,100

31 1 Grocers Wholesale - ANC various 4,000 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 2,000

November

3 1 Northern Commercial - MIC various 7,469 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 2,000

4 1 Grocers Wholesale - ANC various 21,000 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 2,000 1 Produce Wholesale - ANC various 5,000

5 1 Anch. Cold Storage - ANC various 2,500 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 2,400

6 1 Sunrise Bakery - ANC various 3,000

7 1 Anch. Cold Storage - ANC various 4,000

Page 179: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

Date Rec'd

163

Appendix Table B-2 (continued)

Trailer or Truck Loads of Material Deposited in Mail at Anchorage Post Office for Air Transport Onward

Number of Trailers or Trucks

Source Destination

November (Continued)

10

12

13

14

17

18

19

20

21

24

25

26

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

1

1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

Grocers Wholesale - ANC Northern Commercial ANC Kohli - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC

Grocers Wholesale - ANC Knott Co. - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC

Sunrise Bakery - ANC

Anch. Cold Storage - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC

Northern Commercial - ANC ANICA Sunrise Bakery - ANC Produce Wholesale - ANC

Grocers Wholesale - ANC Sunrise Bakery - ANC Weather Bureau Grocers Wholesale - ANC

various various various various

various Bethel various various

various

various various

various various various various

various various various various

Produce Wholesale - ANC various Sunrise Bakery - ANC various

Knott Co. - ANC various Sunrise Bakery - ANC various

ANICA various Sunrise Bakery - ANC various

Grocers Wholesale - ANC various Sunrise Bakery - ANC various

Northern Commercial - ANC various Grocers Wholesale - ANC various Sunrise Bakery - ANC various

Sunrise Bakery - ANC various Northern Commercial - ANC various Grocers Wholesale - ANC various

Estimated Weight

12,000 5,265 2,400 2,300

16,000 3,600 4,000 4,500

2,100

7,200 2,600

2,533 3,000 4,200 5,000

12,000 2,200 3,780 7,500

6,000 2,500

5,000 2,200

2 ,400 4,200

20,000 3,600

3,451 3,000 2,400

2,100 22, 771 10,000

Page 180: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

APPENDIX C - ICE CONDITIONS, WEST COAST OF ALASKA

Source: Captain T. C. Pullen, Report to the Lost River Mining Corporation, Conc;rning Environmental and lee Conditions as They Hight Influence Shipping Operations to the Lost River Area of Alaska. Ottawa, Ontario: Northern Associates Reg'd., January 31, 1971.

! •

Page 181: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

5!>' - .

'"].,,, '"' -l..W..: .1 J 1.J., L..1. ,.J

1n 110 I><

165

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1/8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

FAIR 100

DATA DISTRIBUTION

;tJ .•• ~·

•'

I

I I

\ ..

'• ( "

i I

I

t tEGEND

-- PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF I 18 OR GREATER CONCEN­TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM 1953 THROUGH J 965

-- LIMIT OF OBSERVA !IONS NOTE,

I ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS Of THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY OF OBSER-

- - 60'

! VATIONS PRECLUDES ANALYSIS.

w'-~_;--_c-~ -~-'--'---'-''-_l__i_ _j_L __ L ------~- ----- ·-. -- -·----···--L..--- ~o· PS' 180" ns· 110' If.~· lf.O' !~~-

cl r- JANtJA fEC

Page 182: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

PERIOD OF 06SftlVATIONS POOR fAJR GOOO

....

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE

OF 1 8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

.. (,

11~·

JI , I

~ I

\_ I

i'\~ I

~L~ I ,

I I l~0i I I

l I

I 100~~-.. ·'\.('; 75 '

I

LEG ENO

-- PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF I /B OR GREATER CONCEN· TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM· 1953 THROUGH 1965

-- LIMIT OF OBSERVATIONS

NOTE1 ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS Of THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY OF 08SER­VATIONS PRECLUDES ANALYSIS.

,,. 1'>5'

FEBRUARY

f.

Page 183: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

,,,. --- -- -- .

55' --------- ~-- ---··

I

167

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE

OF l 8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

-L- -- -- .1

'• ""

LEGEND

-- PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRfNCE OF SEA ICE Of J :a OR GREATER CONCEN­TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM 1953 THROUGH 1965

I -, ; .:'

.1J?~--~ -- LIMIT Of OBSERVATIONS , >;-.;,!if:»S~ , NOTE

•' OF THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY OF OBSER-

155' ,,.

.. I I ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS

.--~ _:_L_f __ L_;__J__J__L.._ __ -_--___ v_A 1_1o_N_s_P_R_E_ct_u_o_'_s_A_N_A_t_v_s_1s_. --.. --------.. -_-_..J_ j sw

180' po· 175• 160' I'•'>'

MARCH

Page 184: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

f>ERIOD Of OBSERV.4.TKlNS POOR FAIR GOOD

6S' ·---k ~,..

lJ.... {.,' ·,1 ,.

168

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE

OF 1/8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

~~~50>--~~~~--------

---i::--::::::-:--= 2:1---

" I "

LEGEND

- PERCENT FREQUENCY Of OCCURRENCE Of SEA ICE Of l/B OR GREATER CONCEN­TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM 1953 THROUGH 1965

-- LIMIT Of OBSERVATIONS

NOTE,

_L ___ 1 _1 _I 160'

Jj ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS OF THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY Of OBSER­VATIONS PRECLUDES ANALYSIS.

_J__i.__J_~ .1-.J ___ L_l -~---~----- .. -~--- . ----- . ---·-- ,,,. 110· 160' !',,,·

APRIL

Page 185: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

PERIOD Of c>aSERVA.TtONS

lo~

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE

OF 1 8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

100

POOR 0 THROt.JGH J Yf ARS ~ FAIR 4 THROl.IGH 7 YfA.RS GOOD 8 THROUGH 11

or·t--+---+-

"':-60" -~---~ .. - -~~~-·~·- - . • •. - ~--·-···- .

' .. ; ~

0 ~-~ •• ~- "7-.;.8 ;;.·· 1 .

'

MAY

Page 186: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

PEl;IOD OF 09SEJl:VATIONS POOR fAIR GOOD

60. -----·--·-·-·--·--· -- ----

"

170

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1 /8 OR. GREATER CONCENTRATION

\ ;'

t/~"\ I ·,)

.

LEGEND

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1/8 OR GREATER CONCEN­TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS Yf.ARS FROM 1953 THROUGH 1965

LIMIT OF OBSERVATIONS

NOTE: ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS OF THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY OF OBSER­VATIONS PRECLUDfS ANALYSIS.

""'

, ·,'I , ~~ w·~~~1 -- I I I J L __ L_ I .l._J __ .1. __ ..:._ ___ , __ L.-... -.-.• -.-----------------' i,,rr

115' \8()• )1)" po• I&~· 1(.0• ">','

JUNE

Page 187: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

60"

171

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1/8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

'"" =~~ ~~-\;...._... __ ..;.... __ ._ _________ _. _ _._., ..

PERIOD OF OBSERVATIONS

POOR 0 THROUGH 3 YEARS FAIR .C THROUGH 7 YfAltS GOOD 8 THROUGH 11 YI AR'S

, .. '

'" ..l_J LJ • I .,,. .. PATA OISTRl8UTION

'""

.,.

.~

LEGEND

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE Of I. 8 OR GREATER CONCEN­TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM 1953 THROUGH 1965

LIMIT OF OBSERVATIONS '•. ~ . i

' NOTE, l ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS I OF THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY OF OBSER·

i· L-~~-V_A_n_o_N_s~••_E_c_tu_D_E_s_A_N_A_L_Y_s_is_.~-~~~---' 111)" lf,(J0

J55" ,,.

. 6~·

f,t;'

JULY

Page 188: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

172

PERCENT FREQUENCY Of OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE

OF 1 8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION 16·-· '"'" --~.

~' '-"_,, J--'--'-----"'-'--'-_;..--.:....-'-< TTl"i;,. -,

PERIOD Of O&SERVAflONS POOR 0 THROUGH 3 '!'f:ARS f/\IR GOOD

~s· ·---·-

~7S' __l_L_l--~~

1ao·

'')-

., I~

' l_.l_:__L __ ,__,_____,__L _ _.__--'-----'-

11~· 110·

NOTE: ZERO PERCENT LINE LIES NORTH OF AREA.

\ I

( ~ (/f'-.. ~U" \:,··.

I !

AUGUST

Page 189: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

60' - --·----·- ..

ss· ---·- .

lJ ••• ~·

173

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1 ;8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

• • ;J*lG~OD -------- -- -· 65'

I j Ll Li...1.--J.lJ....LJ,_ .1.LL , .,. ,,~. ,... ,...,. ,.,.

"

I I

I I

I I

t .,,_

.• I "

I

I (j .; . \

I '

---- ·-------···- - . 60'

-+-·~--..;;.='----'-'__.;._:::_' ~~L::__-L:_'.J.______:c__::.;;..;..., 1,

I LEGEND

-- PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE Of l iB OR GREATER CONCEN­TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM 1953 THROUGH 1965

-- LIMIT OF OBSERVATIONS

NOTE,

AllHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS OF THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY Of OBSER­VATIONS PREClUDES ANALYSIS.

.,. ~'._J __ ;_ ___ L_j_j L~LJ_J__i -'-· '----·=--. --.. --------_ -" ____ ,,,. 11s· iso· ]}0' 16'> lf-0' l'>~'

SEPTEMBER

Page 190: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

174

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1/8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

17!1' ISO' 17~' 110' 16S· 160' 155'

ro··.c-;~-r~-.-,-,J:,,::::~~~~.-~~~~--'-~-~~~--'r-~~~~~.~1-~~·~_,~-~---~~1~

F..._IR GOOD

0 THROUGH 3 Yf -'RS <I THROUGH 7 YEARS 8 THROUGH 11 YEARS

MT ---

60' --- ---~··----- - -----·- -------·

.,.

;a.·.. '{,'

' "'°"

\ ..

.• Id ,µ

25 /__.

'· I l ... ~75 ' r /'il I

50"\><d 'j_r~ , 1V •

I

LEGEND

-- PERCENT FREQUENCY Of OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1 /8 OR GREATE:R CONCEN­TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM 1953 THROUGH 1965

-- LIMIT OF OBSERVATIONS

NOTE, ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS IN OTHER PARTS OF THIS AREA, THE SPARSITY OF OBSER­VATIONS PRECLUDES ANALY5'5.

.,,,-

·-----·--------------- --- ----·--- '.>0' l60' \~~-

OCTOBER

Page 191: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

J. / J

PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SEA ICE OF 1/8 OR GREATER CONCENTRATION

=~~ !o--~---'-.... -'--'--..... -'-"'-..l.....l.-l......J...., -.

PERIOD Of OB!>ERV .. TIONS

POOR 0 THROUGH ) YEA.RS fAIR .C THROUGH I Yf ARS G000 YE.AAS

' · .. :! ~_,- • " l POOR "1' J.J.l .1 ; ~I I l 1 J LL J .. Ll .. l_ ..l..J. .. .LL L.Ll

Ht' It.<> ,,.. PO" 1~•· l&O'

60" .. ------····

I ! I

I

DATA DISTRIBUTION

'';-

I I -·

.·2~tfl 75 .J:/rt" 25\ "'-50

25 1

'/ (,,fl ( \,r,"" I

/ I,> Jl'_jl. I . ;, ;,,~~,- I

1

--·-1 ~~:N~~ .-i.. \ ~·,·

I : -- PERCENT FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF I SEA ICE OF I /8 OR GREATER CONCEN-

1

TRATION BASED ON VARIOUS YEARS FROM .,

/ ,,. 1953 THROUGH 1965

/ e> -- LIMIT OF OBSERVATIONS /J '• o• •-~ . "' I :- '<T.;.8 pr~ ·1 NOTE.

~ ALTHOUGH ICE OCCURS t< OTHER PARTS

w·'-----~-----'--'-------'---1. •' ! l___L_'_l__'===~=A=FT=-~=H~=~=A=:~=~=~=Lu='~=·:=s='==~-::--~n:--y~-·s=O=F=O=B-S=ER=-=-=---~----- SO'

17s· 1so· 11s· 170' 16S' lf.o' 1~s-

NOVEMBER

Page 192: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

176

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abrahamson, John D. Westward Alaska: The Native Economy and Its Resource Base. Anchorage: Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, 1968.

Abrams, Charles. Housing the Alaska Native. Anchorage: Alaska State Housing Authority Remote Housing Report No. 1, February 1967.

Adkison, W.L. and Mary H. Brosge (eds.). Proceedings of the Geological Seminar on the North Slope of Alaska. Los Angeles, California: U.S. Geological Survey and American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 19 70.

Alaska. Consultants. Nome Comprehensive Development Plan. Anchorage: Alaska State Housing Authority, 1968.

Alaska. Dept. of Economic Development, Alaska Statistical Review, 1970. Juneau: 1970,

Alaska. Dept. of Fish and Game. Alaska Catch and Production, Commercial Fisheries Statistics 1960-1969. Juneau,

Alaska. Dept. of Highways. Long Range Highway Program. Juneau: 1968.

Alaska. Dept. of Labor. Alaska's Manpower Outlook -- 1970's. Juneau.

------ Cooperative Area Manpower Planning System Committee. Alaska Manpower Training Programs. Juneau: 1970.

Manpower Survey, Kobuk Area. Juneau: 1970.

Manpower Survey, Nome Area. Juneau: 1970.

1970 Census and Alaska Manpower Resources Report on the Barrow-Wainwright Area. Juneau: 1969.

Statistical Quarterly 1960-70. Juneau.

Workforce Estimates. Juneau: 1970.

Alaska. Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. A Survey of Handicapping Conditions. Juneau: 1970.

Alaska Industry, Vol. III, Nos. 6 and 11 consulted. Anchorage: Alaska Industrial Publications, Inc. 1971.

Alaska Municipal Officials Directory 19 72. Alaska Municipal League. Juneau: · 19 72.

!

, '

Page 193: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

177

Alaska (Ter.) Planning Council. Preliminary Economic Survey of the Seward Peninsula Area. Juneau: 1940.

Alaska State Housing Authority. City of Barrow Comprehensive Devel­opment Plan. Anchorage: 1970.

Kotzebue, Alaska Comprehensive Development Plan. Anchorage: 1971.

Alaska Steamship Company. Presentation at the Public Hearings on Deep Draft Navigation Improvement for the Seward Peninsula, held by the Department of the Army, Alaska Division, Corps of Engineers, Nome, Alaska, Kotzebue, Alaska, September 12-13, 196 7. Presentation by Mr. James F. O'Sullivan.

The Alaska Survey and Report, 1970-71. Anchorage: The Research Institute of Alaska, Inc., 1970.

Alaska. Transportation Commission. Quarterly Statistics of Air Taxi Companies, unpublished, 1969-70.

Arctic Transportation Conference, Yellowknife, Northwest Territory. December 8-9, 1970. Conference Papers Vol. I. Ottawa, Ontario: 1970.

Armstrong, Terence. Soviet Northern Development With Some Alaskan Parallels and Contrasts. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1970. (ISEGR Occa­sional Paper #2.)

Arnold, Robert D. A Survey of the Administrative Situation in Alaska as It Affects Eskimos, Indians and Aleuts. Anchorage: Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, 1969.

and Esther C. Wunnicke. Alaska Natives and Federal Hire. ------Anchorage: Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, 1967.

Ballinger, J .N. "Marine Navigational Aids and Terminal Facilities." Ottawa, Ontario: Arctic Transportation Conference, Yellowknife, Northwest Territory, 1970.

Bass, Ken. From an unpublished report prepared for the Alaska Federation of Natives. December 16, 1971.

Berg, Henry C. and Edward H. Cobb. Metalliferous Lode Deposits of Alaska. Washington, D.C.: 1967. (Geological Survey Bulletin 1246.)

Blasko, Donald P. "Regional Economic Development Plan and Program for Alaska Resource Fuels, Petroleum, Natural Gas," U.S. Bureau of Mines, unpublished paper prepared for the Federal Field Committee for Devel­opment Planning in Alaska, Anchorage, February 1971.

Page 194: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

178

"BLM Head Sees Conflict Over Three Land Choices." Anchorage Daily News, January 23, 1972.

Bowkett, Norma S. Direction 70's, An Assessment of Educational Needs in Alaska. Compiled by Alaska Dept. of Education. Juneau: 1970.

Bradner, Tim. "Nome Plays the Waiting Game." Alaska Construction and Oil. May 1969. p. 16.

Brewer, Dr. Max c. "Some Results of Geothermal Investigations of Perma­frost in Northern Alaska." Transactions, American Geophysical Union. February 1958.

Brower, Charles D. Fifty Years Below Zero. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1942.

Brown, George W. Building the Canadian Nation. Vol. II. New York: Macfadden Books, 1968.

Burton, Wayne. Alaska's Agriculture. Economic and Government Research, (ISEGR Report #30.)

Fairbanks: Institute of Social, University of Alaska, 1971.

Civil Aeronautics Board Hearings. Docket 1120826 and 1121238, P.O.D. 201.

Cabinet Task Force on Oil Import Control. The Oil Import Question. Washington, D.C.: 1970.

Callahan, J.E. Geology of T. 15, R. 44 N., Unsurveyed Umiat Principal Meridian in the Kukpowruk Coal Field, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey open file report. n.d.

Carr and Donald and Associates, Ltd. and Site Transportation for Lost 1971.

Preliminary Study of Marine Terminal River Mining Corporation. March 30,

Chance, Norman A. The Eskimo of North Alaska. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.

Chapman, Robert M., Robert L. Detterman and Marvin D. Mangus. Geology of the Killik-Etivluk Rivers Region, Alaska. Washington, D.C.: 1964. (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers 303-F and 303-G.)

and F.C. Sable. Geology of the Utukok-Corwin Region, North­western Alaska. Washington, D.C.: 1960. (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 303.)

Clark and Groff Engineers. Nomeport, A Preliminary Investigation of a Deepwater Harbor at Nome, Alaska, prepared for the City of Nome. November 1968.

Page 195: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

179

Cresap, McCormick and Paget, Management Consultants. A Program for In­creasing the Contribution of Tourism to the Alaskan Economy, pre­pared for the Economic Development Administration of the U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Travel Division, Dept. of Economic Development, State of Alaska, 1968.

DeLeuw, Cather and Associates and Try ck, Nyman and Hayes.. Report and Recommendations for Engineering Service Requirements, Transporta­tion Corridor, Nenana-Dunbar Area to Kobuk River Valley, Office of the Governor, NORTH Commission, State of Alaska. Anchorage and New York: 1968.

Detterman, Robert L. and Robert S. Bickel and George Gryc. Chandler River Region, Alaska. Washington, D.C.: 1963 logical Survey Professional Paper No. 303-E.)

Geology of the (U.S. Geo-

Feulner, Alvin J., Joseph M. Childers and Vernon W. Norman. Water Re­sources of Alaska. Anchorage: U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska District, 1971. (Open File Report.)

"Field Work Study on Railway to North Slope." Fairbanks News Miner, October 21, 1971.

Fischman, Leonard L. The Economic Potential of the Mineral and Botanical Resources of the U.S. Continental Shelf and Slope. Springfield, Virginia: Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Infor­mation, 196 8.

Gazaway, H.P. Rural and 1966.

National Program Inadequacies and Needs to Be·tter Serve Native Alaska. Juneau: U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs,

Geological Survey. Mineral and Water Resources of Alaska. Report to the Congress. Washington, D.C.: 1964.

German and Milne. Transportation Study for Lost River Mining Corporation, Ltd. Montreal: April 29, 1971.

Gilbert, De Witt. The Future of the Fishing Industry of the United States, Vol. IV of New Series Publications, in Fisheries. Seattle: University of Washington, 1968.

Graham, John R. A Summary Report on the Lost River Mineral Deposits, Lost River Area, Seward Peninsula, Alaska, prepared for PCE Explorations Limited. Toronto: April 17, 1970.

Griffin, Warren. "Plans of Action FY 19 71." Anchorage: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare, Alaska Native Health Service, Office of Planning and Evaluation, 1970.

Page 196: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

180

Gryc, George. "The Arctic Slope," Landscapes of Alaska, Geological Survey publication. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1958.

"The Brooks Range," Lands capes of Alaska, Geological Survey publication. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1958.

Hansen, Henry P. (ed.). Arctic Biology. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 1967.

Hare, R. Kenneth. "Weather and Climate." Geography of the North lands. New York: American Geographical Society, 1955.

Harrison, Gordon Scott (ed.). Alaska Public Policy: Current Problems and Issues. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1971.

Heiner, Lawrence E. and Ernest N. Wolff. Mineral Resources of Northern Alaska. Fairbanks: University of Alaska, June 1968. (MIRL Report No. 16.)

Heller, Christine A. and Edward M. Scott. The Alaska Dietary Survey, 1956-61. Anchorage: Public Health Service, Arctic Health Research Center, 196 7.

Herbert, Charles F. Alaska-Northwest Canada Economic Activities, Part I: A Summary Comparison of Mining Laws and Oil and Gas Laws and Practices with Recommendations for Policy. Anchorage: Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, 1967.

Hickok, David M. Observations on the Alaska Reindeer Situation. Anchorage: Jederal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, 1968.

Hippler, Arthur E. Barrow and Kotzebue: An Exploratory Comparison of Acculturation and Education in Two Large Northwestern Alaska Villages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, December 1969.

"Some Observations on the Persistence of Alaska Native Village Populations," Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1969. (ISEGR Research Note A-1.)

"Some Unplanned Consequences of Planned Culture Change." Edmonton, Alberta: Boreal Institute of the University of Alberta, 1968. (Occasional Publication No. 6.)

Hopkins, J.P. and D. M. Hopkins. "The Seward Peninsula." Landscapes of Alaska, Geological Survey publication. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1958.

Page 197: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

181

Hume, James D. and Marshall Schalk. "The Effects of Beach Borrow in the Arctic." Shore and Beach. April 1964.

Johnson, Philip R. and Charles W. Hartman. Environmental Atlas of Alaska. Fairbanks: University of Alaska, 1969.

Kelsall, V.P. The Caribou. Ottawa: Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Canadian Wildlife Series, 1968.

Kleinfeld, Judith and Thomas A. Morehouse. Manpower Needs in Alaska. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, August 1970. (ISEGR Report No. 26.)

Konicek, R.R. Alaskan Air Distribution Analysis. Lockheed-Georgia Company, October 1970.

Laut, Agnes C. The Canadian Commonwealth. Chautauqua, New York: The Chautauqua Press, 1915.

Lemke, Richard W. Unpublished selections from an unpublished report on the geology of the Nome area, U.S. Geological Survey. Denver: October 196 7.

Lin, Peter C. "Alaska's Population and School Enrollments." Alaska Review of Business and Economic Conditions, Vol. VIII, No. s. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1971. ·

Arthur D. Little, Inc. trial Development,

Alaska's Mineral Resources as a Base for Indus­report to the State of Alaska, February 1962.

Locatable Mineral Resources in Alaska. lished report to the Federal Field in Alaska, Anchorage, March 1971.

U.S. Geological Survey, unpub­Committee for Development Planning

Lu, Frederick C., Lawrence Heiner and De Verle P. Harris. Known and Poten­tial Ore Reserves - Seward Peninsula, Alaska. College, Alaska: 1968. (MIRL Report No. 18.)

MacCormac, John. Canada: America's Problem. New York: The Viking Press, 1940.

Massell, Benton F. and Adele P. Massell. "High Prices and Construction Costs in Alaska: an Analysis and Some Policy Guidelines, 11 unpublished report, Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, June 1971.

Meade, Walter J. and Phillip E. Sorenson. 11A National Defense Petroleum Reserve Alternative to Oil Import Quotas, 11 published paper. Santa Barbara: University of California, 1971.

Page 198: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

182

Mirsky, Jeannette. To the Arctic! Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Morehouse, Thomas A. and Victor Fischer. Borough Government in Alaska. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1971. (ISEGR Report No. 29.)

Murie, Adolph. The Wolves of Mount McKinley. National Park Service, Series No. 5. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1944.

North Pacific Fisheries Symposium. Washington Law Review. Seattle: October 196 7.

Northwestern Alaska. Letter from the Secretary of the Army. Washington, D.C.: GPO, March 18, 1959.

Olson, Dean F. Alaska Reindeer Herdsmen. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1969. (ISEGR Report No. 22.)

"Optimism Reigns at Lost River .. " Editorial, Alaska Construction and Oil, Vol. 12, No. 9. Seattle: Alaska Construction News, Inc.

Oswalt, Wendell H. Alaskan Eskimos. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, 196 7.

Parker, Walter B. High Fares and Low Incomes: the Problem of Intra-Alaska Air Routes. Anchorage: Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska, 1970.

Marine Transportation in Alaska's Bering Areas. Ports and Ocean Engineering Conference. University of Norway, August 1971.

Sea and Arctic Ocean Trondheim: Technical

Regulatory and Economic Aspects of the Use of Air Cushion Vehicles in Alaska. Anchorage: Federal Field Committee for Devel­opment Planning in Alaska, January 1971.

Patterson, E. Arthur. Nome Area Overall Economic Development Plan. Nome: 1964.

"Proposed State Selections." Press release of January 22, 1972 by the Office of the Governor for Alaska, Anchorage Daily Times, January 23, 1972.

Pullen, Captain T.C. Report to the Lost River Mining Corporation, Concern­ing Environmental and lee Conditions as They Might Influence Shipping Operations to the Lost River Area of Alaska. Ottawa: Northern Asso­ciates Reg'd., January 31, 1971.

Page 199: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

183

Rice, E.F., J. Ronald Saroff and William B. Fuller. Barrow Community Development Study. Fairbanks: University of Alaska, 1964.

Riley, Francis. Fisheries of the United States ... 1969, C.S.F. No. 5300, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C.:1970.

Rogers, George W. "Alaska Native Population Trends and Vital Statistics." Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, November 1971. (Research Note.)

Alaska Regional Population and Employment. Fairbanks: In­stitute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1967. (ISEGR Report No. 15.)

and Richard A. Cooley. Alaska's Population and Economy. 2 V. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1963. (ISEGR Report No. 1.)

Sater, Beverly F. (ed.). Arctic and Middle North Transportation, based on symposium held in Montreal, March 5,6, and 7, 1969, The Arctic Insti­tute of North America. Montreal: December 1969.

Schrader, F.C. A Reconnaissance in Northern Alaska. Washington, D.C.: 1904. (Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 20.)

Snipes, James c. and Richard A. Schmidt. A System for Coordinating Inter­governmental Planning in Alaska, prepared by Stanford Research Insti­tute for Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska. Menlo Park, California: l1arch 1971.

Spangler, Miller B. New Technology and Marine Resource Development. New York: Praeger, 1970.

and Clifford Eklins. Expanded Requirements for Deep Water Ports ----~-,: and National Policy and Program Alternatives, National Planning Asso-

ciation, November 2, 1967.

Stanford Research Institute. Planning Guidelines for the State of Alaska. 2 V. Prepared for the Office of the Governor, State of Alaska. Menlo Park, California: December 1969.

Sumitomo Shoji Kaisha Ltd. "Coking Coal Imported by Japanese Steel Indus try," unpublished, May 25, 1969.

Surface Transportation for Northern Alaska. Prepared for the NORTH Commission, State of Alaska, adapted from a manuscript by Roger Bye for the NORTH Commission. Anchorage: May,1968.

Page 200: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

l

184

J. Hurray Thomas and Associates. Alaska's Commercial Timber Resources, prepared for the State of Alaska, Dept. of Economic Development. Portland: April 1970.

Tudor, Kelly, Shannon Consultants. Third Interim Report, Alaska Trans­portation Corridor Study, a report to the Dept. of Transportation, February 1971.

Tussing, Arlon R. "Discussion: The Economics of Petroleum Development," delivered at the 20th Alaska Science Conference, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, August 25, 1969.

---=--' Salvatore Comitini, Hubert J. Gellert, Ichirou Inukai, Akio Iwasaki, Michael R.C. Massie, et al. Alaska-Japan Economic Relations. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1968. (ISEGR Report No. 17.)

-----.,-and Gregg K. Erickson. Mining and Public Policy in Alaska. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1969. (ISEGR Report No. 21.)

------' George W. Rogers and Victor Fischer. Alaska Pipeline Report. Fairbanks: Institute of Social, Economic and Government Research, University of Alaska, 1971. (ISEGR Report No. 31.)

U.S. Alaska. International Rail and Highway Commission. "Transport Requirements for the Growth of Northwest North America," Washington, D.C.: 1961. 3 V. (87th Congress, 1st Session. Senate Document No. 170.)

U.S. Army. Corps of Engineers. Northwestern Alaska. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1959.

Point Barrow Beach Erosion Reconnaissance Report. Anchorage: 1969.

Rail and Port Surveys of Alaska. Seattle: 1943.

Reconnaissance for Railroad or Highway West of Fairbanks. Seattle: 1942.

Waterborne Commerce of the United States, Calendar Year 1967, Part 4, Waterways and Harbors, Pacific Coast, Alaska and Hawaii. Vicksburg, Mississippi: 1969,

U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population 1970: General Popula­Characteristics, Final Report PC(l)-B3, Alaska.

Census of Population 1970: General Social and Economic Characteristics, Final Report PC(l)-C3, Alaska.

Census of Population 1970: Number of Inhabitants, Final Report PC(l)-A3, Alaska.

.'I

Page 201: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

~ U.S.

u. s.

185

1970 Census of Population. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1971.

Coast Guard. Polar Transportation Requirements Study Report. 3 V. Washington, D.C.: 1968.

Congress, Senate Committees on Public Works and Commerce. Problems of Alaska. Joint Hearings, 9lst Congress, 2nd Session, July 6, 7, 8, and 10, 1970. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1970.

U.S. Federal Aviation Agency. Alaska Plan for the Arctic Region, Anchorage: 1969.

U.S. Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska. Alaska Community Inventory. Anchorage: 19 71.

Alaska Natives and the Land. Anchorage: 1968.

Economic Outlook for Alaska. Anchorage: 1971.

The Need for Long-Range Communications Development Plan in Alaska. Submitted to the Office of Telecommunications of the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, November 24, 1969.

A Subregional Economic Analysis of Alaska. Anchorage: 1968.

Transportation and Economic Development in Alaska. Joint Federal/State Transportation Task Force. Anchorage: 1968.

rv U.S. Federal Maritime Commission. Alaska Trade Study. GPO, 1967.

Washington, D.C.:

U.S. Dept. of the Interior. Rampart Project, Alaska: Market for Power and Effect of Project on Natural Resources - Volume 1. Juneau: 1965.

U.S. Dept. of Transportation. Alaska: Plan for the Arctic Region. Federal Aviation Administration, Alaska Region. Anchorage: December 1969.

Long-Range Polar Objectives, proceedings of the Long-Range Polar Objectives Conference, Easton, Maryland, March 4-6, 1968. Washington, D.C.: U.S.D.O.T., April 1968.

U.S. House of Representatives, Resolution 10367. "Alaska Native Settle­ment Act of 1971," 92nd Congress, 1st Session, approved December 19, 1971.

U.S. Public Health Service, Barrow Service Unit. Five-Year Social Work Program. Washington, D.C.: 1969.

U.S. Public Land Law Review Commission. One-Third of the Nation's Land. Washington, D.C.: June 1970.

Page 202: ALASKA ANDiseralaska.org/static/legacy_publication_links/1972_03-NWAKEconomic...tis.tics are compiled. 'l;o c!o C>lJr jop, we relied heayiJy e>n.certain individuals who could help

186

U.S. Weather Bureau. Climatic Summary of the United States .•. Alaska. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1965.

Wanke, Alexander A. "Coking Coal Potential in Alaska," unpublished report to the Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska. February 1971.

Wisconsin. University. for the Public Land Policies in Alaska.

Center for Resource Policy Studies and Programs Law Review Commission. Federal Land Laws and

Madison: 1969.

i I

I l l ~