17
Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska Deep Dive Break-Out Session Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Measures of Effective Teaching Study - Findings and Recommendations Session Leader: Al Bertani, RAPPS Senior Design Consultant

Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

  • Upload
    sana

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation : Implications for Alaska Deep Dive Break-Out Session Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Measures of Effective Teaching Study - Findings and Recommendations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership RetreatEmerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for AlaskaDeep Dive Break-Out SessionBill and Melinda Gates FoundationMeasures of Effective Teaching Study - Findings and RecommendationsSession Leader: Al Bertani, RAPPS Senior Design Consultant

Page 2: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET ProjectPublished by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation2010

A new approach to development and evaluation that teachers endorse and that helps all teachers improve.

Goals of the Gates Foundation MET Study

Page 3: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET ProjectPublished by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation2010

1. Whenever feasible, a teacher’s evaluation should include his/her students’ achievement gains.

2. Any additional components of the evaluation (eg. classroom observations, student feedback) should be demonstrably relate to student achievement gains.

3. The measures should include feedback on specific aspects of a teachers’ practice and support teacher growth and development.

Premises of the Gates Foundation MET Study

Page 4: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Gates MET Study

SEE YOUTUBE LINK BELOW FOR VIDEO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tR3ez3b6dh4

Page 5: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET ProjectPublished by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation2010

If we want to change the curve of improvement, we must…

Identify great teachers

Find out what makes them so effective

Transfer those skills to others

Strategies of the Gates Foundation MET Study

Page 6: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET ProjectPublished by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation2010

Measure 1 Student achievement gains on different assessments.

Measure 2 Classroom observations and teacher reflections. Measure 3 Teacher pedagogical content

knowledge.Measure 4 Student perceptions of the

classroom instructional environment.

Measure 5 Teacher perceptions of working conditions and instructional

support at their school.

Data Collected-Gates Foundation MET Study

Page 7: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET ProjectPublished by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation2010

1. In every grade and subject studied, a teacher’s past successes in raising student achievement on state tests is one of the strongest predictors of his/her ability to do it again.

2. Teachers with the highest value-added scores on state tests also tend to help students develop a deeper conceptual understanding as well.

3. The average student knows effective teaching when he/she experiences it.

4. Valid feedback need not be limited to test scores alone.

Gates MET Study Findings – Phase 1

Page 8: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

MET Working with Teachers to Develop Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching June 2010

TODAY FUTURE SCENARIO

High Level Principal Evaluations Only

Rigorous Classroom Observations

Input Observations Student Feedback

Seniority Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Degrees Earned School Working Conditions

Moving From and To…

Page 9: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January 2013

Question 1 Can measures of effective teaching identify teachers who better help students learn?

Question 2 How much weight should be placed on each measure of effective teaching?

Question 3 How can teachers be assured trustworthy results from classroom observations?

Research Study Questions – Phase 2

Page 10: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January 2013

1. Effective teaching can be measured. Teachers previously identified as more effective caused students to learn more.  Groups of teachers identified as less effective caused students to learn less.

Major Research Findings

2. Balanced weights indicate multiple aspects of effective teaching. Teaching is too complex for any single measure of performance to capture it accurately.  Trade off’s to using different models.

3. Adding a second observer increases reliability significantly more than having the same observer score an additional lesson.

Adding outside observers can provide an on-going check against in-school bias.

Page 11: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January 2013

Framing What We Know Now…

Page 12: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

MET Project Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching January 2013

Lesson 1 Student perception surveys and classroomobservations can provide meaningful feedback toteachers.

Lesson 2 Implementing specific procedures in evaluation systems can increase trust in the data and the

results.

Lesson 3 Each measure adds something of value.

Lesson 4 A balanced approach is most sensible when assigning weights to form a composite measure.

Lesson 5 There is great potential in using video for teacherfeedback and for the training and assessment of observers.

What We Know Now

Page 13: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

How Teacher Development Could Revolutionize Our Schools?By Bill Gates published in the Washington PostFebruary 28, 2011

“We know that of all the variables under a school’s control, the single most decisive factor in student achievement is excellent teaching. It is astonishing what great teachers can do for their students. Yet compared with the countries that outperform us in education, we do very little to measure, develop, and reward excellent teaching. We have been expecting teachers to be effective withoutgiving them feedback and training.”

Influence of the Gates Foundation

Page 14: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

How Teacher Development Could Revolutionize Our Schools?By Bill Gates published in the Washington PostFebruary 28, 2011

Proxies for improving student achievement… Automatic salary increases based on seniority ($50 billion per year)

Bump in pay for advanced degrees ($15 billion per year)

Reducing class size (U.S. has twice as many teachers per student

than they did in 1960.

Influence of the Gates Foundation

Page 15: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Learning about Teaching – Initial Findings from the MET ProjectPublished by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation2010

1. Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) - Pianta and Hamre

2. Framework for Teaching – Danielson

3. Mathematical Quality of Instruction (MQI) – Hill & Ball4. Protocol for Language Arts Teaching Observations

(PLATO) – Grossman5. Quality Science Teaching (QST) - Pecheone

Evaluation Instruments Used in the MET Study

Page 16: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

ATLANTA Not Evident Emerging Proficient Exemplary

COLLEGE READY PROMISE Level 1 Level II Level III Level IV

DENVER Ineffective Approaching Effective Distinguished

HILLSBOROUGH Requires Action

Developing Accomplished Exemplary

MEMPHIS Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

PITTSBURGH Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

PRINCE GEORGE’S

Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished

TULSA Ineffective Needs Improvement

Effective Highly Effective

Superior

Gates Partnership Sites – Levels of Performance

Page 17: Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat

Gates MET Project Teaching Video

SEE YOUTUBE LINK BELOW FOR VIDEO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mv8z6DPycU