Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Alameda County Coordinated Entry System Committee Meeting 4 May 5, 2016
1
Agenda � Meeting Objectives
� Welcome and Introductions
� Progress toward Coordinated Entry
� Referral Process
� Integrating Sub-Populations
� Training and Coordination
� Wrap-up
2
1. Welcome and Introductions Meeting Objectives � Review progress to date and next steps � Discuss and recommend referral, hand-off, program
acceptance � Discuss considerations for working with TAY, people
fleeing DV, Veterans � Identify system needs for training and coordination
3
2. Progress toward CES in Alameda County
� Summary of Design Recommendations made to date
� Remaining decisions
4
Recommendations to Date
� Characteristics of Access Points/Hubs
� Criteria for Prioritization and continuous prioritization (highest needs)
� Relationship to DV system
� Regional matches to shelter/crisis housing
� County-wide match to TH/PSH
5
Remaining Areas for Recommendations
� Referral guidelines (today)
� TAY, DV, Veterans programs and CES (today and special meetings)
� Training needs and coordination (today)
� Tool development (subcommittee, May)
� Prevention/Diversion approach (June mtg)
6
Permanent Supportive Housing RRH/Market Rental
Triage
Literally Homeless
Non-Homeless
Emergency Shelter
Housing Navigation Services
Transitional Housing
Housing Prioritization &
Matching
Subsidized Rental Friends/Family
Diversion and prevention
Coordinated Entry System
Outreach – Access - Referral
Connected Services: Health, benefits, Behavioral Health, Substance Abuse,
legal, Childcare, Education, Employment Services
HRC/HUB Diversion
7
Housing Resource Centers And Connec1ons Central Number,
Pre-‐assessment/Screening, Coordina1on Among and Between HRCs, Hand off,
Data, Oversight, and Learning
Solid Line to diamond shape = referral/connec1on to homeless services (i.e., ES, TH, RRH)
Dashed Line to oval shape = Referral/connec1on to non-‐homeless services
Van and purple lines = mobile outreach services that will also provide access to screening and service referrals
3. Referral Process
Review Guiding Principles, then consider: � Outreach � Call-In � Initial triage � Assessment � Prioritization � Housing Navigation
� EXERCISE
9
4. Integrating TAY, people fleeing DV, Veterans
Factors to consider: � Mandated referral streams � Funding similarities or differences � Percent who are homeless � Outreach focus � Connected services (Like VA) � Population differences or concerns (safety, comfort) � Data collection and resources � Housing resources
10
5. Training and Coordination
Training Needs – What training is needed for whom and how frequently � Personal brainstorming � Group discussion
Coordination - What types of regular meetings/coordination will be needed: � Group discussion Other start up considerations
11
5. Training and Coordination
Coordination - What types of regular meetings/coordination will be needed: � All Hubs across regions? How frequently and what key issues � All programs within a region? How frequently and what key
issues � All Navigators? � All outreach? � Subpopulations specialties? � Coordination with other counties? � What gets integrated into existing collaborative meetings/
existing meeting infrastructure? � Other? Other start up considerations
12
Wrap-up
As we near the end of the CES design phase, consider: � What did we accomplish today? � What are our next steps as individuals, agencies,
collaboratives, countywide?
13
Next Steps and Timing
� CES Committee and Sub-Committees ◦ Next full meeting 6/2: Prevention and Diversion, Loose
Ends ◦ Community Meeting ◦ Tools Committee
� In store for Phase 2 � Implementation planning July – October, incl. standards,
protocols, and performance measures � Staged launch county-wide
14