Airdeccan Case Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    1/24

    BACKGROUND OF LOW COST AIRLINE INDUSTRY

    A low-cost carrier or low-cost airline (also known as a no-frills, discount or budget carrier or

    airline) is an airline that generally has lower fares. To make up for revenue lost in decreased

    ticket prices, the airline may charge for extras like food, priority boarding, seat allocating,

    and baggage etc.

    The term originated within the airline industry referring to airlines with a lower operating

    cost structure than their competitors. While the term is often applied to any carrier with low

    ticket prices and limited services, regardless of their operating models, low-cost carriers

    should not be confused with regional airlines that operate short flights without service, or

    with full-service airlines offering some reduced fares.

    Business model

    Low-cost carrier business model practices include:

    a single passenger class a single type of aircraft (commonly the Airbus A320 or Boeing 737 families),

    reducing training and servicing costs

    a minimum set of optional equipment on the aircraft, further reducing costs ofacquisition and maintenance, as well as keeping the weight of the aircraft lower and

    thus saving fuel:

    no AVOD etc.; often excluding conveniences such as ACARS and autothrottle no in-flight entertainment systems made available no seat recliners, seat pockets, window blinds or seat headrest covers a simple fare scheme, such as charging one-way tickets half that of round-trips

    (typically fares increase as the plane fills up, which rewards early reservations)

    flying to cheaper, less congested secondary airports and flying early in the morning orlate in the evening to avoid air traffic delays and take advantage of lower landing fees

    fast turnaround times (allowing maximum use of aircraft) unreserved seating (encouraging passengers to board early and quickly, thus further

    decreasing turnaround times)

    simplified routes, emphasizing point-to-point transit instead of transfers at hubs (againenhancing aircraft use and eliminating disruption due to delayed passengers or

    luggage missing connecting flights)

    encourage the use of direct flights. Luggage is not automatically transferred from oneflight to another, even if both flights are with the same company.

    generation of ancillary revenue from a variety of activities, such as la carte featuresand commission-based products

    emphasis on direct sales of tickets, especially over the Internet (avoiding fees andcommissions paid to travel agents and computer reservations systems)

    employees working in multiple roles, for instance flight attendants also cleaning theaircraft or working as gate agents (limiting personnel costs)

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    2/24

    a disinclination to handle Special Service passengers, for instance by placing a higherage limit on unaccompanied minors than full service carriers

    aggressive fuel hedging programs passengers paying charges for extras, such as hold luggage, online check in and

    priority boarding avoiding using jetways to board and alight passengers by using a mobile stairway

    which is a cheaper alternative.

    not supplying meals in a flight, but offering snacks, sandwiches and drinks instead topurchase on board

    no refunds or transfers to later flights in the event of missed flights, i.e. if the aircraftleaves on time without a passenger who arrived late, he will have to buy a wholly new

    ticket for the next flight.

    Not every low-cost carrier implements all of the above points. For example, some try to

    differentiate themselves with allocated seating, while others operate more than one aircraft

    type, still others will have relatively high operating costs but lower fares. JetBlue for instance

    has in-flight entertainment (i.e. LiveTV) in every passenger seat.

    The price policy of the low cost carriers is usually very dynamic, with discounts and tickets

    in promotion. Even if the advertised price may be very low, sometimes it does not include

    charges & taxes.

    As the number of low-cost carriers has grown, these airlines have begun to compete with one

    another in addition to the traditional carriers. In the US, airlines have responded by

    introducing variations to the model. Frontier Airlines and JetBlue Airways advertise satellitetelevision. Advertiser-supported Skybus Airlines launched from Columbus in 2007, but

    ceased operations in April, 2008. In Europe, the emphasis has remained on reducing costs

    and no-frills service. In 2004, Ryanair announced proposals to eliminate reclining seats,

    window blinds, seat headrest covers, and seat pockets from its aircraft.

    The budget airlines frequently offer flights at low pricesoften flights are advertised as free

    (plus applicable taxes, fees and charges.) Perhaps as many (or as few) as ten percent of the

    seats on any flight are offered at the lowest price, and are the first to sell. The prices steadily

    rise thereafter to a point where they can be comparable or more expensive than a flight on a

    full-service carrier.

    Additional expenses charged can border on the fraudulent, such as levying a credit card

    charge where credit card is the only payment method accepted.

    Traditional perceptions of the "low-cost carrier" as a stripped-down, no-frills airline, as seen

    on Southwest Airlines, have been changing as new entrants to the market adapt the business

    model in new ways. AirTran Airways and Spirit Airlines offer a premium cabin while

    Frontier and JetBlue offer live in-flight television, sometimes for an extra fee. AirTran has

    XM Satellite Radio available at every seat. Frontier, JetBlue, and AirTran all use assigned

    seating. Some airlines even have services not available on some legacy carriers, such as mood

    lighting, found in Virgin America.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    3/24

    Criticism

    Some elements of the low-cost model have been subject to criticism by Governments and

    Regulators, and in the UK in particular the issue of "Unbundling" of ancillary charges by

    both low-cost carriers and other airlines (showing airport fees, taxes as separate charges

    rather than as part of the advertised fare) to make the "headline fare" appear lower has

    resulted in enforcement action. Believing that this amounts to a misleading approach to

    pricing, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) in February 2007 gave all carriers and travel

    companies three months to include all fixed non-optional costs in their basic advertised

    prices. Although the full service carriers had complied within the specified timescales, the

    low-cost carriers have been less successful in this respect, leading to the prospect of legal

    action by the OFT.

    Many low-cost carriers show a zero cost for some flights. Most charge additional fees for

    airport check-in, baggage check-in, 'handling charges', seat allocation and credit card

    processing. These charges are non-refundable even in the case of cancellation by the airline.

    Low-cost carriers regularly weigh carry-on bags, check them for size and impose high

    penalty charges for any carry-ons exceeding their stipulations. Ryanair requires that

    passengers' airport purchases fit within their carry-on bag.

    No-frills long-haul flights

    The first airline offering no-frills transatlantic service was Freddie Laker's Laker Airways,

    which operated its famous "Skytrain" service between London and New York City during thelate 1970s. The service was suspended after Laker's competitors, British Airways and Pan

    Am, were able to price Skytrain out of the market.

    It has been suggested that the Airbus A380, able to hold up to 853 passengers in an all

    Economy layout, would enable true low-cost long-haul service. While the per-seat costs of

    such an aircraft would be lower than the competition, there are fewer cost savings possible in

    a long-haul operation and therefore a long-haul low-cost operator would find it harder to

    differentiate itself from a conventional airline. In particular, low-cost carriers typically fly

    their aircraft for more hours and flights each day, scheduling the first departure early in the

    morning and the last arrival late at night. However, long-haul aircraft scheduling is more

    determined by timezone constraints (e.g. leaving the US East Coast in the evening and

    arriving in Europe the following morning), and the longer flight times mean there is less

    scope to increase aircraft utilization by adding one or two more short flights each day.

    In 2004 the Irish company Aer Lingus lowered its prices to compete with companies such as

    Ryanair on shorthaul, however they maintain a full service on transatlantic flights. Late in

    2004 the Canadian airline Zoom Airlines also started selling transatlantic flights between

    Glasgow, UK; Manchester, UK; and Canada for 89.

    Australia's Jetstar has operated international flights since 2005, when they began service toChristchurch, New Zealand. In late 2006, more international services began. Departing from

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    4/24

    Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, they fly to popular tourist destinations within 10 hours of

    Australia such as Honolulu, Japan, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and more. With the delivery

    of new planes, they hope to fly to the continental US and Europe.

    In April 2006, the industry magazine Airline Business analysed the potential for low-cost

    long-haul service and concluded that a number of Asian carriers, including AirAsia, were

    closest to making such a model work. On November 2, 2007, AirAsia X, a subsidiary of

    AirAsia and Virgin Group flew its inaugural flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to Gold

    Coast, Australia. AirAsia X claims that it is the first true low-cost long-haul carrier since the

    end of Sir Freddie Laker era.

    In August 2006, Zoom Airlines announced that it was to establish a UK subsidiary probably

    based at Gatwick Airport, to offer low-cost long-haul flights to the USA and India. The

    company suspended all its operations from 28 August 2008 due to financial problems related

    to the high fuel price.

    On 26 October 2006, Oasis Hong Kong Airlines started flying from Hong Kong to London

    Gatwick Airport (delayed by one day because Russia suspended fly-over rights for that flight

    an hour before the flight's scheduled departure). The cheapest prices for flights between Hong

    Kong to London could be as low at 75 (approximately US$150) per leg (not including taxes

    and other charges) for economy class and 470 (approximately US$940) per leg for business

    class for the same route. From 28 June 2007, a second long-haul route to Vancouver, British

    Columbia was started. The company ceased operations on 9 April 2008, after over 1 billion

    HKD of losses.

    In late 2007, Cebu Pacific, the Philippine based low cost carrier, announced intentions to

    launch non-stop Pacific flights from the Philippines to the United States West Coast and other

    US cities by around mid-2009.

    On March 11 2009, AirAsia X started its first low cost long-haul service into Europe to

    London Stansted, England. The daily flights to Stansted are operated by two leased Airbus

    A340-300 aircraft. A one way economy class ticket often costs 150 and the Premium class

    one way often costs 350.

    US Airways calls itself a low-cost airline, however usually its international fares are equal to

    other major carriers.

    Low-cost business only carriers

    A trend from the mid-2000s was the formation of new low-cost carriers exclusively targeting

    the long-haul business market, with aircraft configured for a single class of service, initially

    on transatlantic routings. Probably best described as "fewer frills" rather than "no frills", the

    initial entrants in this market utilised second-hand, mid-sized, twin jets such as Boeing 757

    and Boeing 767 in an attempt to service the lucrative London-US Eastern Seaboard market:

    Eos Airlines, which ceased operating on 27 April 2008

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    5/24

    Maxjet, which has ceased its scheduled business flights, but is planning to restart as aluxury charter carrier

    Silverjet, which ceased operations on 30 May 2008.Airline revenue from non-ticket sources, which is called ancillary revenue, has become an

    important financial component for low-cost carriers (LCCs) in Europe and is being adopted

    by all types of airlines throughout the world. Ancillary revenue has been defined as,

    Revenue beyond the sale of tickets that are generated by direct sales to passengers, or

    indirectly as a part of the travel experience. Ancillary revenue has been further defined to

    include these categories: la carte features, commission-based products, and frequent flier

    activities.

    History

    European consumers would likely attribute the birth of this movement to Europes largest

    low fare airline - Ryanair. Michael O'Leary, Chief Executive of the airline, describedancillary revenue during a 2001 interview in the UK Sunday Times. The other airlines are

    asking how they can put up fares. We are asking how we could get rid of them.

    The unorthodox business model envisioned by OLeary uses commissions from pay-per-view

    entertainment, onboard shopping, internet gaming, car hire and hotel bookings to eventually

    replace the revenue from selling airline seats. Consumers may someday fly for free, but

    airline executives already benefit from the bottom line boost provided by ancillary revenue.

    OLearys radical idea catalyzed an industry-wide trend to coax more revenue from the

    profit-challenged airline business.

    Management at competing airlines often ridiculed the path pursued by Ryanair. Traditional

    carriers defined their product distinction by bundling many amenities into the price of an

    airline ticket. At the same time, low cost carriers had not yet embraced the option of selling

    an unbundled airline experience.

    Passenger reaction

    Airlines can boost their revenues by "unbundling" the travel experience by charging separate

    fees for services such as checked baggage and beverages served onboard. Low cost carriers

    such as easyJet and Ryanair have generated significant profit from ancillary revenue.However, the consumer backlash from charging fees (for services included in the price of a

    ticket by other airlines) can damage a carrier's reputation. For example, "European Skyway

    Robbery" was the headline written by noted travel columnist Peter Greenberg to warn

    consumers of abusive overcharging for baggage fees in Europe by easyJet and other carriers.

    The world's largest carriers are not immune from the public backlash against aggressive

    ancillary revenue actions. British Airways also wanted to boost its ancillary revenue with

    higher baggage fees during 2007. The carrier eventually backed down after the public outcry

    became too great. These have turned airlines into finding ways to increase ancillary revenue

    without hurting their brand.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    6/24

    Need for airlines

    The unrelenting increase in the price of jet fuel has greatly impacted the economics of the

    airline business. When combined with other factors, the outcome has created considerable

    challenges for traditional airlines and low fare carriers.

    2007 has been especially difficult as the price oil reached the neighborhood of $100 per

    barrel during late 2007. Concurrent with this, Ryanair announced record half-year profits.

    Announcing these results Ryanairs CEO, Michael O'Leary, said: These record profits

    reflect a 20% growth in passenger volumes, a 1% decline in yields, and strong ancillary

    growth. Ancillary revenues grew by 54% to 252 million, due to improved penetration of car

    hire, hotels, travel insurance, as well as strong onboard sales and excess baggage revenues.

    Ancillaries now account for just over 16% of total revenues as we make steady progress

    towards our 20% target.

    Ryanairs 408 million profit, along with ancillary revenues of 252 million, confirmed whatthe airline industry has already realized. Ancillary revenue activities have become a

    necessary ingredient in the profit mix of successful airlines.

    Other airlines all over the world also report ancillary revenue from legacy airlines to low cost

    carriers. The following lists total ancillary revenue reported by these airlines for fiscal year

    2006: easyJet 189,476,508, Aer Lingus 63,407,000, SkyEurope 10,827,000, AirAsia

    (Malaysia) 22,713,479.

    Types

    A la carte features: amenities a consumer can order while travelling. The list continues to

    grow and the following lists typical activities: 1) onboard sales of food and beverages, 2)

    checking of baggage and excess baggage, 3) assigned seats or better seats such as aisle rows,

    4) call center support for reservations, 5) fees charged for purchases made with credit cards,

    and 6) early boarding benefits.

    Commission-based products: commissions earned by airlines on the sale of hotel

    accommodations, car rentals and travel insurance. These primarily involve the airlines web

    site, but it can include the sale of duty-free and consumer products on board aircraft.

    Frequent flyer programs: The frequent flyer category is defined by the sale of miles or points

    to program partners such as hotel chains and car rental companies, co-branded credit cards

    (co-branding), online malls, retailers, and communication services.

    Industry agreement largely exists for inclusion of la carte features and commission-based

    products under the ancillary revenue banner. These are perfectly aligned with Ryanairs

    current ancillary revenue activities. Frequent flyer activities represent an inclusion that is

    growing in acceptance.

    Airbus has shipped 4,291 A320 series aircraft since their certification/first delivery in early

    1988, with another 2,257 on firm order (as of 31 May 2010). In comparison, Boeing has

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    7/24

    shipped 6,409 737s since late 1967, with 4,903 of those deliveries since 1988, and has a

    further 2,000 on firm order (as of 31 May 2010). Based on figures since 1988 when they first

    entered direct competition, Airbus delivered on average 194 A320 series aircraft per annum,

    while on average 221 Boeing 737s were delivered.

    TRAITS OF G.R. GOPINATH AS AN ENTREPRENEUR

    Capt G R Gopinath or Gorur Ramaswamy Iyengar Gopinath or 'Gopi' as he is affectionately

    called was born in a Hassan Iyengar family of the remote village ofGorur, Karnataka.

    Starting his studies in a village school, he completed his further schooling at Sainik School,

    Bijapur. Thereafter he joined the distinguished National Defence Academy and later

    graduated from the Indian Military Academy as a commissioned officer in the Indian Army.

    He then went on to serve the Army for eight years. He currently lives in Bangalore with his

    wife and 2 daughters, Pallavi and Krithika. He had contested in 2009 lok sabha elections as

    an independent candidate but he lost it. In 2009 Gopinath started Deccan 360 freight and

    logistics operation.

    In 1995, the Indian government started the reforms process by encouraging entrepreneurship.

    In the next year he stated a private sector commercial helicopter service, Deccan Aviation. In

    2003 he launched India's first low-cost airline, Air Deccan which was later purchased and

    merged into Kingfisher Airlines

    Awards and Honours given to G.R. Gopinath

    2005 - Rajyotsava Award (Karnataka)

    2007 - Chevalier de la legion dHonneur(France)Personality of the Decade Award (K.G. Foundation)

    Sir M Visvesvaraya Memorial Award (Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce &

    Industry)

    1. From growing fruits and vegetables he moved into sericulture wherein he developedan eco friendly method of silk farming. He was always looking for opportunities in

    the market and his development of new eco friendly method of silk farming shows

    that he was not only concerned of profits in his ventures for innovation but was alsoconcerned about environment and society benefits his innovations could give.

    2. A series of business ventures followed, but his passion and steely determination sawhim steer each one to success. The best example other than the success story of Air

    Deccan would be that he set up a heli-chartered service in 1995 and it took only 5

    years for this service to become Indias largest heli charter Company.

    3. In early 2002, While changing flights at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International airportGopinath was impressed by how a mid-level American airport was handling twice the

    number of flights as whole of India. He was not just impressed but saw an

    opportunity tailor made for India. He instantly analysed the applicability of his plan

    in Indian context and started working on that as soon as he returned back to India.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hassan_Iyengar&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gorur,_Karnataka&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karnatakahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karnatakahttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gorur,_Karnataka&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hassan_Iyengar&action=edit&redlink=1
  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    8/24

    And in only one year he was ready with a commercial air passenger service plying

    single route (Bangalore-Hubli-Banglore) as a unit of DAPL.

    4. He targeted the segment of the society which was never targeted by any company ofAviation industry. It was too risky but he was ready to break the barriers of

    perception that middle class is expected to travel on duty only by road or rail howeverurgent the need. He saw potential in segments no one ever thought of.

    5. After the commencement of Air Deccan a lot of other companies followed him andentered in Low Cost Airlines Segment.

    6. He was looking up for making the Air travel cheaper and cheaper and so he put inmany innovative ideas for the same some of which were not even effecting the

    comfort of the passengers like converting the airplane into a Billboard.

    7. He always had a clear and ambitious vision. I believe that for India to be adeveloped country, every Indian should be able to fly. In all developed countries, the

    common man flies he said.

    8. He changed the whole face of Indian Aviation Industry and the growth rate of thisindustry increased many fold after the commencement of Air Deccan.

    ENTREPRENEURIAL STRATEGIES ADOPTED:

    Planning phase Strategy-

    The entrepreneur who was the pioneer of Air Deccan, Mr. Gorur Ramaswamy Gopinath

    planned a low cost airline venture. The idea itself gave a competitive advantage against other

    players in the Airline Industry of India. In fact, Mr. Gopinath figured out angles to competewith the Indian Railways with the vision of Empowering every Indian to fly.

    Penetrating the market:

    Air Deccan wished to target three market segments:-

    1. Leisure Travellers this segment comprised of people who travelled for holiday and

    pleasure, with the unique character of advance planning. This segment was price elastic and

    under penetrated.

    2. Business travellers this segment included those who owned small and mediumenterprises, travelled by ac classes on train, and were cost and time conscious.

    3. Corporate TravellersThis segment consisted of those working in large corporations

    and was frequent fliers.

    For the first segment, the strategy was to plan an advance- booking facility with theattraction of fares starting low and increasing as the date of travel neared.

    For the second segment, the strategy was to allure the cost and time consciousbusiness travellers who could save on hotel bills by avoiding overnight stays.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    9/24

    For the third segment, the strategy was to attract the big corporations by reducingtheir travel expenditures incurred by their employees.

    Such a penetration strategy would help Mr. Gopinaths aspiration to eye on every segment,

    paving the way for a successful venture.

    Implementing the low-cost idea:

    Eliminate all frills like hot meals, frequent flier programs, Full complement of flightattendance, etc.

    Installing new passenger seats by saving the storage space. Increasing the seat factor by 20 % by eliminating business class, reducing seat pitch

    and removing couple of galleys.

    Reducing time for cleaning the aircraft by doing away with food and drinks and thusenabling quicker turnarounds.

    No issuing of tickets thus reducing cost of printing and processing. Selling snacks and non- alcoholic drinks generating revenue. Introducing online booking of tickets and removing intermediaries. Eliminating toll free calling by customers. Introducing point-to-point service that saves time and cost.

    Keeping the promise of sticking to low fares to customers was the key motive of Air Deccan.

    And for this, Mr. Gopinath wanted its marketing strategy to be cantered on pricing,

    distribution, and mutually beneficial alliances.

    Pricing-

    There were three options under consideration for pricing the air tickets. These are:-

    1. Keeping the fares below existing full service carriers.

    2. Adopting two tiers of pricing- higher tier resembling 1st option, and lower tier

    having really low fares compatible with that of railways.

    3. Pricing all tickets between high fares of existing airlines and low fares of railways.

    Distribution-

    Removal of intermediaries and using Internet for selling tickets making it cost effective.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    10/24

    Marketing Alliance-

    To reduce risk in operation, leverage mutual skills and reduce costs, the Air Deccan entered

    the following alliances:-

    1. Indian publishing house, Bennett Coleman & Co.for selling tickets.

    2. Jigrahak Mobility Solution for internet technology.

    3. Hyderabad Aircraft Maintenance Company for maintenance, repair and overhaul.

    The Business Phase Strategy-

    1. Concentrated on unconnected regional areas-Air Deccan did not connect with the metros initially. They entered the regional areas, which

    were disconnected, but promised capacity traffic.

    2. Two pronged fleet strategy-Air Deccan was flying 48 and 72 seater ATRs on their regional routes and 180 seater A320

    on the trunk routes. The logic behind this was that smaller aircrafts were suitable for the

    shorter runways at regional airports, while the jet aircrafts on the trunk routes helped to

    achieve higher capacity and carry passengers over a longer range than ATRs.

    3. Lease with Airbus-They entered into an operating lease with the Airbus wherein the title remained with theaircraft owner while the operator paid up rental payments which were tax deductible and

    reduced not only the capital expenditure on the balance sheet but also operators exposure to

    uncertainty of the aircrafts residual value at the time of disposal.

    4. Lean staffing-It adopted lean and mean approach to staffing levels and aimed at maintaining a low

    aircraft to employee ratio to keep operating costs lower.

    5. Pricing-Air Deccan kept graded Pricing structure:

    Lowest priced tickets, booked weeks ahead of schedule which would comprise 25%

    of total seats in an aircraft.

    Higher priced tickets as the date of departure neared.

    The pricing strategy for a particular flight was governed by factors like day and month of the

    year, competitive schedules of that day, competitive pricing, events and festivals, and

    historicity.

    Air Deccan through this Dynamic pricing, sought to maximize revenue.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    11/24

    6. Marketing Alliance-In addition to the formation of the alliances mentioned in the planning phase, Air Deccan

    made alliance with:-

    1. Hindustan Petroleum Corp. for selling of tickets through internet enabled computers.

    2. Reliance Web World for selling tickets through its nationwide retail chain of

    Broadband internet centres.

    3. Indian Railways for selling airline tickets to the wait-listed rail passengers.

    4. Tieup with Caf Coffee Day.

    5. Tie up with ICICI for travel agent purchase card.

    7.

    Alternative Revenue Channels-

    Air Deccan used most parts of its aircraft as advertising bill boards. Storage bins,headrests, tray tables, baggage tags and even boarding passes were utilized for the

    same.

    Even the magazines distributed to the passengers generated revenue throughadvertising sales.

    There was an In flight Shopping Scheme called Brand for less Customers had to pay for food and beverages, headsets of television and various other

    items in flight.

    Promotion of this low cost airline was done through television channels, newspapers, and

    radio channels.

    SWOT Analysis

    Strength:

    1. The entrepreneurial success and experience gained from previous start-ups of G.R.Gopinath surely is one of the greatest strengths of Air Deccan.

    2. Deccan hade quite an experience in aviation industry as it already had charteredhelicopters.India's largest private Heli-charter company.

    3. Highest Load Efficiency.4. Flies to destinations in Hinterland5. A lean and mean Approach to staffing.6. Operations expanded into Sri Lanka7. Leader in LCC Segment, First to target the middle class. It would surely give Air

    Deccan the First mover advantage

    8. Highest market share in the LCC Segment is also one of the greatest strengths of AirDeccan.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    12/24

    Weakness:

    1. There were constant harping about poor customer service and no free food.2. Being a low cost airline, the employee strength is minimal, and thus, coordination and

    procedures take their toll.

    3. Delay in flights was a major bottleneck for Air Deccan4. Air Deccan has no back up aircraft. The airline quite often cancelled its flights to

    different destinations due to engineering and other problems.

    5. Full refund that it offers passengers is meaningless because a transfer to anotherairline is probably thrice as expensive. So passengers could not fully rely on Air

    Deccan for some important travel and need to have their own backup in Train or other

    Airline Services.

    6. They do not have any customer loyalty programs, and the customer database is notbeing utilized to it potential.

    7. Focus was exclusive on South Indian Markets.8. Very Limited Advertisement.9. Already reached the threshold of cost Efficiency10.Image plagued by frequent breakdowns and near misses and breakdowns.11.Some other weaknesses leading to problems not only to Air Deccan but to all the

    airlines Companies are

    a. Infrastructural Constraintsb. Shortage of Airport Facilities.c. Air Traffic control facilitiesd. Takeoff and Landing Slots

    Opportunities:

    1. No low cost Airlines was there in India when Air Deccan started its venture.2. India has a population over 1 billion and Indian railways had the highest share of

    Transportation facilities. The Aviation market was under- penetrated.

    3. 15 million Travel by Train Daily, of which 700,000 travel by A.C. Even 5% of theAC passengers if convinced for Air Travel it will give a big Market in LCC Segment.

    4. Increase in leisure travels by tourists increased by 15% in 2005. And foreign touristsare also increasing at quite a rate every year.

    5. It is easy to create Airways Capacity than Road and rail transport.6. Rising Income level and Demographic profile of the population. The upgrading

    phenomenon plying in the market where everyone was trying to upgrade themselves

    to upper section and Low cost Airlines had the power to satisfy this need of the

    middle class as Air Travel has always been a status symbol for the people.

    7. Extensive network to exploit the booming Air cargo Business. It was still untapped tothe extent it could be.

    8. Plenty of Scope for expansion of operations.9. Could start Contractual Employment.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    13/24

    10.There were a lot of options of outsourcing with which one can provide Qualityservices to their customers without worrying about the underlying details and

    concentrating on the Basics of the Business.

    Threat:

    1. High Attrition rate: The fierce competition among airlines has affected the operationsof Air Deccan too. Several airhostesses of the airline had left for jobs with foreign

    airlines while 15 co-pilots have joined Indian Airlines.

    2. Kingfisher started its operations with value-added services at low tariffs.Though the segment targeted is different, and the routes do not clash for time being, it

    sure promises competition in future.

    3. The threat of New Entrants into (LCC) segment esp. GO AIR, Spice Jet, Indigo andJagson Airlines. There were many quite well Aviation industry companies which

    could easily use the strategy followed by Air Deccan to lure the passengers at

    comparatively lower prices as they are better experienced and have more

    infrastructural support.

    4. High Risk Perception. This was a totally new experiment on Indian market.Resistance to change might play a very negative role in the plan to change the

    perception of the people.

    5. Low Entry Barrier and open Sky Policies could give a great opportunity to newentrants.

    Market Analysis

    The Indian aviation sector has shown enormous growth in the past decade.

    This sector is a collection of multiple functions like airports, airlines, ground handling, airtraffic control, safety, security, etc. 1 The major challenges faced by the aviation sector isfierce competition, rising fuel prices, and infrastructure bottlenecks. The major players in thissector are Air India, Jet Airways, Kingfisher Airlines, Spicejet, Indigo, GoAir, andParamount Airways. Out of these; Air India, Jet Airways, and Kingfisher Airlines are fullservice carriers while the others are low cost carriers. Air India, Jet Airways, and KingfisherAirlines also offer low cost services. The low cost subsidiary of Air India is Air India

    Express, while that of Jet Airways is JetLite; and that of Kingfisher Airlines is KingfisherRed (erstwhile Air Deccan).

    It all began with Air Deccan introducing rock bottom fares equaling the AC IItier trainfares. In response to that, all major leading airlines slashed rates. In July 2006, around 3.1million seats were created, out of which only 2.5 million seats were being occupied. 70 percent of all those travelers travelled on discounted fares. The result was that all the airlineswere bleeding with heavy losses.

    Other reasons for losses were increasing price of Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF) and otheroperational costs. Air Traffic Control (ATC) delays are also proving to be very expensive.

    For a minute of delay by the ATC, an aircraft burns Rs. 2500 worth of fuel. Despite all this,

    http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2005-05-10-india-airline_x.htm?POE=TRVISVAhttp://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2005-05-10-india-airline_x.htm?POE=TRVISVA
  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    14/24

    the obligation to keep prices low and competitive still remains.2 The fares have deliberatelybeen kept at low levels to stimulate demand. 3

    There was a rapid increase in air travelers in 2007 when the number of domestic passengersincreased by about 40 percent. This encouraged nearly all the airlines to buy new aircraft,

    despite the fact that the losses amounted to around Rs. 2000 crores on account of rising ATFprices and payments of aircraft. Due to increase in the number of planes, coupled with theincrease in the number of passengers, immense pressure was exerted on the aviationinfrastructure. The Ministry of Civil Aviation handled this situation through policies thatencourage private or merchant airports. An example of this being the new Rajiv GandhiInternational Airport in Hyderabad, which was developed by GMR.

    When ATF prices did fall in November 2008, it did not, however, result in low passengerfares. The airlines claimed that they were still making losses, and this was an opportune timeto make good their losses.But due to the economic slowdown and the terror attacks inMumbai, passenger occupancy was on a record low. In December 2008, when Air India

    reduced fares, other airlines had to follow suit due to mounting pressures from all quarters. The fare cuts were expected to boost passenger occupancy. In January 2009, the increase inbookings was not proportionate with the reduction in fares. Though the move has increasedflight occupancy from 60 per cent to 65 percent, industry experts opined that the industry hasto achieve more than 70 percent to break even.

    By the end of 2009, passenger traffic was up by 6 to 7 per cent. Passengers carried bydomestic airlines from January-April, 2010 were 162.82 lakhs as against 133.41 lakhs in thecorresponding period of year 2009 thereby registering a growth of 22.05%. The totaldomestic passengers carried by the scheduled airlines of India in the month of April, 2010were 41.88 lakhs.India as a country is cost conscious, and hence Indians prefer low costcarriers over full service carriers. Hence, full service carriers are facing a greater challenge interms of passenger occupancy. Paramount Airways, Indigo and Spicejet have posted profitsin 2010 while all others have posted losses.

    Indias civil aviation sector is ranked ninth in the world. It is set to be among the top five in

    the world in the next five years.

    As given in the case study the market share of various companies as of October 2005 isshown below:

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    15/24

    Airline-wise details of market share of scheduled domestic airlines for the month of April,2010 are as follows: (Source: Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)).

    Competitor Analysis:

    Air Deccans major competitors are listed below:

    1. Jet Airways2. Spicejet3. Indian Airlines

    Detailed analyses of these are as follows:

    1) Jet Airways: Jet Airways is an airline based in Mumbai. It is India's third largest airline

    after Air India and Kingfisher Airlines. It operates over 400 daily flights to 64 destinations

    Jet Airways

    35%

    Indian Airlines

    28%

    Air Sahara

    12%

    Air Deccan

    11%

    King Fisher

    6%

    Spicejet

    5%

    Others

    3%

    Market Share as of October 2005

    012345

    6789

    10

    Market Share (in lakhs)

    Market Share (in lakhs)

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    16/24

    worldwide. Jet Airways is widely regarded as India's biggest and best airline. It's a privately

    owned, full service airline that commenced operating in mid 1993. It's now captured almost

    23% of the market, and has bases in Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, and

    Bangalore.

    The airline is known for its outstanding in-flight service, food, punctuality, and baggage

    handling. Staff are extremely efficient and courteous, and will go out of their way to ensure

    that you're comfortable and well looked after.

    Marketing strategy:

    Jet Airways has partnered with UTV to launch the online contest 'Cannes calling',wherein winners got a chance to attend the Cannes Film Festival 2009 along with a

    companion.

    Jet is trying to highlight its product superiority.Swot Analysis of Jet Airways:

    Strength

    Has created a good image among the Indian fliers. Trusted Airline by the Corporate

    Weakness

    Competition from the LCCsOpportunity

    Strongly positioned in the International routes Has presence in every segment

    Threats

    LCCs eating up the market share Rising Fuel Costs

    Rising Labour Costs

    2) Air India: Air India is state-owned, and administered as part of the National Aviation

    Company of India Limited - which was created in 2007 to facilitate Air India's merger with

    Indian Airlines. Air India is the 16th largest airline in Asia, serving 25 destinations

    worldwide, and, with its affiliated carriers, serves over 100 cities.

    Around 2006-07, the airlines began showing signs of financial distress. The combined losses

    for Air India and Indian Airlines in 2006-07 were Rs 771 crores. After the merger of the

    airlines, this went up to Rs 7200 crores by March 2009.This was followed by restructuring

    plans which are still in progress. In July 2009, SBI Capital Markets Ltd was appointed to

    prepare a road map for the recovery of the airline. The carrier cancelled the purchase of six

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    17/24

    Boeing 777-300ER in July 2009 and sold three Airbus A300 and one Boeing 747-300M in

    March 2009 for $ 18.75 million to survive the financial crunch.

    SWOT Analysis of Air India

    Strength

    Air India has been the largest air carrier in India in terms of traffic volume andcompany assets.

    It owns the most updated fleet and competent repairs and maintenanceexpertise.

    Its information systems are advanced and compatible with its operation andservice.

    It has a good reputation in both international and domestic markets, qualityservice and the age-old Goodwill that has still kept it alive in the interests of

    the rescue operators.

    Has financial backing of the GovernmentWeaknesses

    Air India is operating across broad international and domestic marketscompeting with world leading giant airlines as well as local small operators.

    This lack of clarity on the strategic direction largely dilutes its capabilities and

    confuses its brand within markets.

    Low profitability and utilization of capacity. Growing Competitor base and entry of Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs) The airlines high-cost structure and the compulsions of being a public sector

    unit are the reasons and it had been making a loss and shall continue to make

    losses for some more quarters.

    Opportunities

    India airline industry is growing faster and will continue to grow as the GDPincreases, and the trend is predicted to continue once the slowdown recedes.

    Worldwide deregulations make the skies more accessible; the route agreementis easier to be achieved. The number of foreign visitors and investors to India

    is increasing rapidly.

    Complementary industry like tourism will increase demand for airline service.The Civil Aviation Ministrys strong regulation and protection provides

    opportunities for consolidation and optimization.

    Customers are getting wealthier, tend to be less price-conscious and prefer tochoose quality service over cost.

    Threats

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    18/24

    Air India faces imminent aggressive competition from world leading airlinesand price wars triggered by domestic players.

    The Indian Railway Ministry has dramatically improved speed and services intheir medium/long distant routes, attracting passengers away from air service,

    with prices almost at par with the low cost carriers.

    3) Spicejet: Kal Airways Pvt. Ltd. operating as SpiceJet is a low-cost airline headquartered in

    Gurgaon, India. It began service in May 2005 and by 2008, it was India's second-largest low-

    cost airline in terms of market share. SpiceJet was voted as the best low-cost airline in South

    Asia and Central Asia region by Skytrax in 2007.

    SWOT analysis of Spicejet:

    Strength

    Strong backing by the Promoters LCC segment is ever growing in the country

    Weakness

    Low visibility amongst LCCOpportunity

    Middle Class taking to the skiesThreats

    Strong competition in LCC segment Rising Fuel Costs Rising Labour Costs

    From the competitor analysis we can say that Air Deccan is facing a stiff competition from

    both Jet Airways and Air Indian. Where Jet Airways is the most favoured by corporate and

    has grabbed a major market share then Air India has the backing of government and a great

    goodwill among the customers with high class maintenance staff.

    After going through the market analysis and the competitor analysis, the next step is to find

    where Air India stand in the BCG matrix.

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    19/24

    BOSTON CONSULTANCY GROUP ANALYSIS

    YEAR no.of growth ratePassengers (mn)

    1996 10.4 -1997 11.2 7.7%1998 11.5 (1.3)%1999 12.0 4.3%2000 12.7 5.8%2001 13.7 7.9%2002 12.8 (6.6)%2003 13.9 8.6%2004 15.7 12.9%2005 19.9 26.8%2006 24.87 25.00%

    MARKET SHARE AS OF OCTOBER

    %MKT SHARE

    CARRIER 2005 2006JET 35 46INDIAN AIRLINES 28 25AIR SAHARA 12 -AIR DECCAN 11 13KINGFISHER 6 8SPICEJET 5 6OTHERS 3 2

    BCG MATRIX FOR AIR DECCAN 2005

    30%

    26.8%

    Market

    Growth rate 15%

    11

    Relative market share

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    20/24

    BCG MATRIX FOR AIR DECCAN 2006

    30%

    25.00%

    Market

    Growth rate 15%

    0%

    13

    Relative market share

    Analysis from BCG Matrix:

    BCG matrix analysis of both the years shows that Air Deccan had been fairly performing well. In both

    the year the matrix plotted shows that Air Deccan lays in the star region of the matrix. This means that

    the company has fair chances to prosper in the future.

    But the actual facts contradict the predictions of BCG matrix. The company merged in the very next

    year that is in 2007. This probably means that apart from market share holding and market growth

    rate, there are other factors too that affect the future prospects of an organization.

    Financial Statement Analysis

    1) Profit margin:

    -6%

    -5%

    -4%

    -3%

    -2%

    -1%

    0%

    1%

    2%

    3%

    2003 2004 2005

    Profit Margin

    Profit Margin

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    21/24

    From the graph we can clearly see that profit margin for Air Deccan kept on declining over the year.

    To explore more we try to find the asset turnover ratio which is shown in the graph below:

    From the graph we can clearly say that decrease in profit is because of the reason that the asset

    turnover ratio has also decreased over the years. It signals that the firm is not able to make use of its

    resources properly.

    2) Current ratio:

    From the graph we can see that the firms current ratio has never been favourable i.e. the firm has

    taken a lot of loans.

    The above scenario was before the merger with Kingfisher Airlines and it is not suggesting a very

    good situation for the firm.

    Scenario after the merger:

    1) Profit margin:

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    2003 2004 2005

    Asset turnover

    Asset turnover

    Current Ratio0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    2003

    2004 2005

    Current Ratio

    Current Ratio

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    22/24

    Even after the merger the profit margin is still below zero as shown in the above picture.

    2) Current Ratio:

    Even the current ratio is not favourable even after the merger.

    Analysis & Conclusion

    The vision of Captain G. R. Gopinath to create a whole new market for customers who

    could fly economically could be achieved only via his will-power, futuristic outlook and

    strong determination. His entrepreneurial skills will not just inspire us, but also the

    generations to come. It was not that roads were made smooth for him, but it was his

    courage to move in the toughest roads. He did not let his dreams die in the vague of losses

    that were suffered by Air Deccan; rather he took the great move of merger withKingfisher to keep his company growing. This clearly shows his futuristic outlook,

    -100%

    -80%

    -60%

    -40%

    -20%

    0%

    Mar '10 Mar '09 Mar '08 Jun '07

    Profit Margin

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    Mar '10 Mar '09 Mar '08 Jun '07

    Current Ratio

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    23/24

    instead of perishing with the limited funds; he rather merged with a giant firm, and

    eventually got his share. He has again revived himself with Deccan 360.

    LCC has revolutionised the Indian Aviation industry. But soon after Air Deccan came

    into view, there grew a lot of competition in the aviation market. First challenge that grew

    in for Air Deccan was to keep its market share protected and then to ultimately run the

    company with profit. Captain G. R. Gopinath had somehow proved to be ineffective in

    retaining the market share of Air Deccan and thus the profits also started slipping down.

    Than the day came when our entrepreneur had to choose among the two things, first was

    his company which was running at huge loss and second was a merger being offered by

    Mr. Vijay Mallya.

    So Captain chose to get the company going with a bigger name of Kingfisher, and thus a

    merger deal was signed. Captain along with his angel investors got his share, though a

    position was offered to Captain which he accepted whole-heartedly. The case focuses on

    the fact that how the skills of an entrepreneur, and his believe in himself gave way to a

    whole new concept.

    It was not easy for Captain G. R. Gopinath to arrange for funds, but he had all his plans in

    his mind and therefore, could he get the help from his friend and angel investors.

    Throughout his journey, he had seen lots of ups and downs, but he never laid back. Then,

    came the competitors of Air Deccan. With the Open Sky Policy, the competition

    increased. And there came a merger of Air Deccan Company with Kingfisher Airlines.

    Mode of action for the company

    With the merger of Air Deccan with the Kingfisher, a new spark came into view. But, this

    was also short run, as the merged company Kingfisher Red is still under the face of

    absence of profit, or we can say that could not come out of the losses. And the losses are

    still showing an increasing trend. The companys market share has also dropped down.

    From gaining the first mover advantage, the company has slowly gone down. So where

    lies the fault. While keeping these points in mind, we would like to suggest some

    measures for the company to revive its profit and to again be the market leader:-

    i. Focus from where it startedThe primary focus of the company was the common man. And in the main

    sequence, it forgot about the common man. So once again it should focus on the

    common man. The promotions and pricing strategy should be more relevant to the

    middle-class people and should reach them by time. It can also take the help of

    mobile phones.

    ii. Building brand loyaltyBrand building has become important in every aspect. So it has to take some good

    measures to build its brand.

    iii. Focus on the target customersPrime focus of Air Deccan should be on its target customers.

    iv. Regional connectivity

  • 8/2/2019 Airdeccan Case Analysis

    24/24

    This is one area, in which it still needs to work high.

    v. Burden of high debt should be off-loadedDebt should be reduced, as it is very high.

    vi. Should shift its prime focus from South IndiaThe company should focus on India as a whole, and not segregate in parts.vii. Frequent breakdowns should be avoided