Upload
osborn-dixon
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Air-sea heat fluxes and the dynamics of intraseasonal variability
Adam Sobel, Eric Maloney,
Gilles Bellon, Dargan Frierson
The tropical atmosphere has strong, coherent variability onthe intraseasonal (30-60 day) time scale
Equatorial outgoing longwave radiation, a measureof deep, high cloudiness (shading) – annual cycle & ENSO removed tim
e
longitude-90 -50 -30 -10 10 30 50 90
Climate models’ simulations of intraseasonal variability are flawed, but improving
But there is no agreement on the basic mechanisms despite ~3 ½ decades of study
Lin et al. 2006
Wave propagation
Mean flowPerturbation flow
Enhanced sfc flux
Emanuel (87) and Neelin et al. (87) proposed that the MJOis a Kelvin wave driven by wind-induced surface fluxes (“WISHE”)
θ=θ1+Δθ
θ=θ1
cool warm
This idea has been somewhat abandoned because the real MJO does not look quite like the original WISHE theory
Observed cloudiness and wind from TOGA COARE(Chen, Houze and Mapes 1996)
Strongest winds and fluxes are in phase with orlag precipitation, and lie in westerlies
Shinoda et al. 1998
ocean land
Net = 0 W/m^2
Over land, there can be no significant net flux variationson intraseasonal time scales - so if we see land-sea contrastsin intraseasonal variability, net flux are likely to be important.
NorthernSummer
SouthernSummer
And available observations do show a contrast:variance of rainfall on intraseasonal timescales shows structure on both global and regional scales
Sobel, Maloney, Bellon, and Frierson 2008: Nature Geosci., 1, 653-657.
Intraseasonal rain variance
Intraseasonal rainfall variance, nov-apr
Climatological mean rainfall, nov-apr
Climatological patterns resemble variance, exceptthat the mean doesn’t have localized minima over land
Simple model(amplitude ismax-min)
GCM (amplitudeis std. dev.of filtered data)
We can model regional-scale intraseasonal variability by considering single columns forced by a planetary-scale traveling ISO disturbance, taken to be external.
SST Precip
Mixed layer depth ->
Maloney and Sobel 2004, J. Atmos. Sci., 17, 4368-4386.
Some GCMs behave similarly to the SCM as thermal inertia varies.
GFDL AM2
There is a definite suggestion that better MJO simulation corresponds to larger role for surface fluxes
better model worse model
control
No-WISHE(const sfcwind speed)
Importance of surface enthalpy fluxes
good
ness
of
MJO
sim
ulat
ion
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
We can imagine a model intercomparison project that might help us to get useful information about mechanisms out of flawed models
We also have a “simple” axisymmetric model which produces an intraseasonal northward-propagating oscillation, robustly to parameters (like in Asian monsoon)
time
Latitude (1000’s km)
Precipitation anomaly (mm/d)
Bellon and Sobel 2008, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 470-489.
Wind-induced sfc fluxes are crucial to the model instability.
Eq
ua
tor
Summary
• Simple models of several types have intraseasonal oscillations that depend on surface flux feedbacks.
• At least two GCMs work similarly (though at least one other doesn’t).
• Observed ISO (at least in SH summer) has substantial net surface energy flux anomalies in more or less correct phase to develop the oscillation.
• Observed variance of ISO is maximum over ocean, minimum over land, in both seasons and hemispheres – this is evidence that surface fluxes are important.
Concluding remarks• We argue that surface fluxes (turbulent and radiative)
are important to the energetics of intraseasonal variability.
• This is testable in models. • Even if true, it would neither mean we deeply
understand the ISO, nor that we could necessarily simulate or predict it better.
• Still, if we could decide conclusively on this it would be a step forward.
Sobel, Maloney, Bellon, and Frierson 2008a: Nature Geosci., 1, 653-657.Sobel, Maloney, Bellon, and Frierson 2008b: JAMES-D, submitted http://adv-model-earth-syst-discuss.org/index.php/JAMES-D/article/view/15