14
Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e ASIP PANEL SESSION ASIP PANEL SESSION USAF NDI Reliability USAF NDI Reliability Improvements Improvements Session Chair John Brausch System Support NDI Lead Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory

Air Force Materiel Command - ASIP Conference Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e ASIP PANEL SESSION USAF NDI Reliability Improvements

  • Upload
    lehuong

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Air Force Materiel CommandAir Force Materiel Command

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

ASIP PANEL SESSIONASIP PANEL SESSIONUSAF NDI Reliability USAF NDI Reliability

ImprovementsImprovements

Session ChairJohn Brausch

System Support NDI LeadMaterials and Manufacturing Directorate

Air Force Research Laboratory

Panel Members

Jeffrey CatronChief Engineer for Maintenance, Tinker AFB

David CampbellNDI Program Manager, Tinker Air Force Base

David PiotrowskiSenior NDI Engineer, Delta Airlines

David ForsythConsultant, Texas Research Institute

PODProbability of Detection

• Measures ability of the inspection system to detect cracks

• Assumes inspection is accomplished

• Function of:– Instrumentation & probe– Calibration– T.O. procedures– Structural location– Etc.

Inspection Reliability

Capability is a function of POD and POICapability is a function of POD and POI

POIProbability of Inspection

• Measures probability inspection is accomplished per validated process/procedures

• Associated with choices or decisions (discrete events) that influence the inspection process

• Examples: – Large vs. small area inspections– Inspector fatigue influences– Correct inspection locations– Surface prep– Record keeping

POD = a(90/95) = Capability

Measure of System Performance

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1a(90/95)

System Variations

a (flaw size)

Pro

babi

lity

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

a(NDI) = a(90/95) x POI = Reliability

a(90/95)

a (flaw size)

Pro

babi

lity

POI = 1.0

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

a(NDI) = a(90/95) x POI = Reliability

a(90/95)

POI <1.0 drives redundant inspections

a (flaw size)

Pro

babi

lity

POI = 0.75a(68/95)

POI = 1.0

AFMC NDI Summit Outcomes

• Enforce policy and establish guidance– Baseline safety-of-flight (S-o-F) structure NDI requirement…….... In Progress– Establish NDI capability baseline & best practices……………………. In Progress– Conduct NDI Benchmarking………………………………………………… In Progress– Implement improved NDI analyses for decision making– Create NDI guidance to complement MIL-STD-1530C

• Establish effective organization– Improve NDI organizational structure …………………………………....... In Progress– Conduct NDI systems analysis………………………………………………. In Progress– Respond to recommendations from AFIA Eagle Look Study

• Train and educate stakeholders– Enhance awareness among program & Mx personnel …………………... In Progress– Conduct ALC NDI proficiency testing

• Ensure required inspection capability exists– Review and update NDI tech data & data systems………………………... In Progress– Ensure availability of required equipment

Addressing POD and POI

Questions to Address

• Can we continue to rely on inspections to maintain safety-of-flight structures where cracking exists?

• What is being done, near term, to improve reliability?

• How do we improve POI and reduce human factors variance?

• How can we do a better job estimating inspection capability?

• How do we motivate our inspection force to achieve excellence.

IDENTIFY and IMPLEMENT SOLUTIONS

Moving in the Right Direction

Baselining Eddy Current Standard PracticesTO-33B-1-2

Problem:Significant variability exists in eddy current inspection procedures across USAF resulting in inconsistent capability from system-to-system.Approach: • Published standardized eddy current inspection procedures (set-up and calibration) USAF wide (TO-33B-1-2).

• Baselining inspection capability for standard practices at the ALC’s

Impact• Establishes standard practice throughout USAF• Reduces cost and time for tech data updates• Establishes common procedures to develop

baseline POD assumptions

Establishing a Capability Baseline

Establishing a Capability Baseline

Reducing Inspection VariabilityExample: EC Inspection Around Fasteners

Reducing Inspection VariabilityExample: EC Inspection Around Fasteners

Reducing Inspection VariabilityExample: EC Inspection Around Fasteners

Conformal/compliant Radius Coils

Extended fieldcompliant surface probes

Improving Eddy Current Probe DesignsA Transformation

Reduced Variability + Improved Coverage = Improved POD and POI