Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AIDS in Salvador,
Brazil, in times of
COVID-19Carlos Brites
Salvador: HIV EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE
• Salvador is the 4th. largest Brazilian city (~3 million inhabitants)
• It is the 6th. Brazilian city in HIV incidence (4.7 per 1,000), in 2018
17,919,2
25,031,2 33,8 35,6
40,4 45,745,0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Gráfico 1 - Taxa de
incidência(100.000 hab) de aids em
maiores de 13 anos segundo ano de
diagnótico, Salvador - Ba, 2007-
2015.
HIV incidence rate (per 100,000), according to the year
of diagnosis, 2007-2015
HIV incidence rate (per 100,000), according to the
year of diagnosis, 2007-2015
Salvador: HIV RESPONSE- OVERVIEW
• Diagnostic tests (rapid and conventional) are offered at basic health units, free of costs
• Once diagnosed, patients are referred to the nearest referral center (6 main referral centers in town)
• HIV staging is performed (PVL, CD4 count, serological tests for common coinfections, clinical investigation) and ART is started, regardless CD4 count. ART is available at no cost.
• ART is dispensed at intervals of 1-3 months. Every 6 months patients must provide the most recent PVL test at pharmacy, to check treatment effectiveness
• PrEP (currently limited to one center) and PEP available, as well as free distribution of male and female condoms
• In case of virological failure, genotyping is available at no cost.
Salvador : POLICY OVERVIEW
• HIV testing to identify new cases is still a problem: although free of costs testing is available, many at risk populations are not routinely tested
• Current referral centers for care are at their limit to receive new patients
• Need of monthly refill for some ARV drugs
• Social support for patients
Salvador: GAPS AND BARRIERS - 2014
• The first Salvador´s cascade of care showed the main gap were in the first two 90´s: diagnosis and retention
11,960
7,8427,240
6,017
4,3223,824
100% 66% 61% 50% 36% 32%0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Salvador Cascade, 2014
PLHIV Diagnosed Linked Retained on ART Viral suppression
65.567%
55.115%
88.470%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%90-90-90 - Salvador , 2014
% Diagnosed % Linked on ART % Viral suppression
Salvador: GAPS AND BARRIERS - 2015
• The Salvador cascade of care shows the main gap is in the first two 90´: diagnosis and retention
14,774
10,708 10,1078,813
7,783 7,781
100% 72% 68% 60% 53% 53%0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000 Salvador, 2015
PLHIV Diagnosed Linked Retained on ART Viral suppression
68.711%
61.136%
90.289%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
90-90-90 in Salvador, 2015
% Diagnosed % Linked on ART % Viral suppression
Salvador: a current view (2018)
Care Cascade 90-90-90 Targets, Salvador, 2018
95,5%
80.3%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
% de diagnosticadas % TARV dos vinculados % CV suprimida dos emTARV
% Linked to care % on ART % Viral
suppression
PLHIV Diagnosed Linked Retained on ART Viral suppression
20320.489
13452.51512851.0
10916.0 10798.0 10798.0
100% 66% 63% 54% 53% 53%0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Reamining Gaps - 2018
66% 80% 10%
-24%
-10%
100%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
% PVHAdiagnosticadas
% TARV dosdiagnosticados
% CV suprimida dosem TARV
GA
P p
ara
met
a 9
0%
Target 90%
66.202%
80.268%
100.00%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
% de PVHAdiagnosticadas
% TARV dosdiagnosticados
% CV suprimida dos emTARV
% Diagnosed % On ART % Viral suppression*
% Diagnosed % On ART % Viral suppression*
COVID-19 in Salvador
• First cases diagnosed in March 13th.
• All initial cases imported from European countries
• Current situation (June, 21): 46,279 cases (52% in Salvador), 1,391 deaths (3%)
Impact of COVID-19 on HIV Care in Salvador
• Most of referral centers stopped routine care
• All prescriptions were extended for 3 months for stable patients
• Medical visits postponed
• Pharmacy delivering drugs refill for 3 months, to avoid the need of visits to referral
centers
• Only patients presenting with detectabe HIV viral load / any acute complaints are
attended
Current Situation
• Only 50% of patients coming to scheduled medical visits
• The need of planning the “return to normal”
• Concerns on adherence to therapy and problems with comorbidities
• No data on the specific impact of COVID-19 on HIV patients
How to return to normal?
• Adequacy of facilities to avoid crowded waiting rooms
• Implementation of telemedicine
• Ongoing serosurveillance to SARS-CoV-2 in HIV patients
Thank you!