28
Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Hashini Galhena Dissanayake Ph.D. Michigan State University

Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics

Hashini Galhena Dissanayake Ph.D.

Michigan State University

Page 2: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Outline

Overview of agriculture sector1. Complexities in food systems

2. Emerging challenges

3. Overview of agriculture in developing countries

Strategies to increase agricultural production

Socioeconomic impacts of agricultural biotechnology and

1. Benefits

2. Concerns raised

Cartagena protocol on Biosafety

Approaches for socio-economic analysis

Page 3: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Overview of agriculture sector

Page 4: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Characteristics of agriculture sectors in Indonesia

Agriculture is a key sector in the

economy

Smallholders are the main

producers

Importer of agricultural

commodities

(rice, soy, sugar, corn, wheat, etc.)

(BBS)

High agricultural potential yet

low productivity

Depleting or fixed production inputs

Vulnerability to biotic and abiotic

stresses

Page 5: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Major Emerging Global Challenges

Population growth Food insecurity MalnutritionVulnerability to climate change

Loss of biodiversity Energy insecurityNatural Resources

limitationsPests and diseases

outbreaks

Page 6: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Food production

challenges are complex

Improving yields

Protecting what’s produced before and after

Ensuring access to resources and equity

Addressing needs (when, where, who)

TODAY’s

Page 7: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Rice Imports - total rice milled equivalent

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

Import Quantity (000' tons) Import Value (1000 US$)

Page 8: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Potato Imports

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Potatoes, frozen (tonnes) Potatoes (tonnes)

Page 9: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Strategies to increase agricultural production

Page 10: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

How to increase agricultural production?

1. Reallocation of resources or prioritization

Page 11: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

How to increase agricultural production?

2. Increase production inputs – land, labor, capital, etc..

Page 12: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

How to increase agricultural production?

3. Trade

Page 13: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

How to increase agricultural production?

4. Introduction of new science and technology

Page 14: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Source of growth in agricultural output

in high-income countries

(1961 – 2014)

Page 15: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Source of growth in agricultural output

in low-countries (1961 – 2014)

Page 16: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Some factors to consider when adopting new technologies

Relevance - contextappropriate

Affordable Accessible

Resource efficientEconomically viable:

economic gains > economic cost

Scale neutral - small farmers benefit as

much as large farmers

Safety – humans and environment

Socioeconomics –culture, gender, etc.

Page 17: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Genetic Engineering (GE) is a tool for enhancing agricultural productivity and reducing crop losses resulting from

biotic and abiotic stresses

Page 18: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Socioeconomic impacts of Agricultural biotechnology

Page 19: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT

CATEGORIES

Page 20: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Beneficial socioeconomic impacts

Page 21: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

① Agronomic and production benefits• Yield gains (reduce losses,

• Reduced pressure to use new land for agriculture

• Input use efficiencies

• Production efficiencies

②Social benefits• Poverty alleviation

• Increase food availability and access

• Improve nutrition

• Make available nutritious and safe foods

• Reduce handling and exposure to agro-chemicals

• Gender-based attributes

• Better quality of life

Page 22: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Benefits to producers – yields

Farmers in developing countries achieve greater yield increases

Sources: Brookes and Barfoot 2014

Page 23: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

④ Biotic stress management• Pest control and minimize

impacts on non-targeted organisms

• Better weed management

• Disease resistance

• Nematode resistance

③ Economic benefits• Decrease cost of production

• Improved quality of output

• Income gains

Page 24: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Benefits to producers – Revenues

CountryCost of

technology ($)

Averagegross farm

incomebenefit

minus cost of technology

Key benefit

1st Gen.HT Soybean

United State 15–53 32 Cost savings

South Africa 2–30 6 Cost savingsBrazil 7–25 32 Cost savings

HT Maize

United State 15–30 27 Cost savings

South Africa 9–18 5 Cost savingsBrazil 10–32 49 Cost savings and yield gains of 1% to 7%

HT CottonUnited State 13–82 21 Cost savingsSouth Africa 13–32 34 Cost savingsBrazil 26–54 67 Cost savings and yield gains of 1.6% to

4%

Source: Graham Brookes & Peter Barfoot (2017)

Page 25: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

⑤ Abiotic stress management• Salt stress

• Drought tolerance

• Thermo-tolerance

⑥ Environmental benefits• Low use of hazardous chemical pesticides

• Reduced damage from soil-incorporated residual agro-chemicals

• Reduce tillage, energy-use and GHG emissions

• Minimize impacts on non-targeted organisms

Page 26: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Benefits to producers – input use

Trait

Change in volume of

active ingredient

used(million kg)

Change in field EIQ impact (in

terms ofmillion field

EIQ/ha units)

% changein AI use on GMcrops

% change in environmental

impact associated

with herbicide & insecticide use on GM c

Area GMtrait 2011

(million ha)

HT soybeans -2.3 -7,200 -0.1 -14.5 80.7

HT + IR soybeans -0.4 -41 -0.8 -2.8 2.5

HT maize -210.5 -6,689 -9.2 -13.5 43.8

HT canola -18.4 -661 -16.5 -27.9 8.1

HT cotton -21.3 -527 -7.2 -9.5 4.0

IR maize -71.7 -3,117 -51.6 -53.1 47.5

IR cotton -227.5 -10,234 -26.6 -29.4 22.4

HT sugar beet +1.7 -1 +31.2 -0.8 0.47

TOTAL -550.4 -28,470 -8.6 -19.0

Sources: Brookes and Barfoot 2015

Note: the reduced EIQ for the HT crops is because glyphosate is one of the most environmentally benign herbicides (less toxic, rapidly degraded in soil, less subject to run off into ground water).

Page 27: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

⑦ Trade and market benefits

• Trade opportunities or marketability

• Improved quality

• Reduce spoilage

Page 28: Agricultural Biotechnology and Socioeconomics Michigan ...cdast.unej.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/... · 1. Complexities in food systems 2. Emerging challenges 3. Overview of

Adoption of GE crops in the U.S. - very rapid

In 201796% soybean

92% corn96% cotton

planted in the U.S. were GE varieties

GE crops were first introduced in 1995