Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    1/24

    Aggregate planning 1

    Aggregate planning / scheduling

    Medium range plan - what we will make over thenext 3-18 months.

    general demand

    controllable variables / forms of capacity production rates

    labor levels

    inventory levels

    outsourcing

    overtime

    does not include investments in facilities

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    2/24

    Aggregate planning 2

    Linkages

    Marketing: when will products be available ? Lead times ? Excess inventory

    (good time for a sale?)

    Accounting and Finance:

    cash flows- will we be making more than we are selling?

    do we have to finance inventory?

    when will suppliers need to be paid?

    Human resources

    timing of hiring, firing and training

    Information Systems

    what to track

    linkages to other supply chain members

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    3/24

    Aggregate planning 3

    Aggregate planning strategies

    Companies can do any or all of the following: Use inventory to absorb changes in demand

    Vary the size of the workforce

    Vary work hours part timers

    overtime

    Outsource parts they could make

    the entire product

    Demand management

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    4/24

    Aggregate planning 4

    Examples of different strategies: tool and die

    shops

    1) Atlas Tool and Die (competes on cost)

    as demand increases working hours increase -

    until both shifts are working 65 hours a week

    once the shop is effectively running 24 a day

    they start to outsource. If there is enough

    demand they will outsource the entire project.

    as demand decrease they bring work back inhouse and then cut work hours

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    5/24

    Aggregate planning 5

    Examples: DieCast

    2) DieCast (competes on innovation / knowledge) work hours set at 50 a week

    size of workforce driven by decision to keep people

    working 50 hours a week all the time. usually outsource simple work

    never outsource entire project

    when demand decreases they bring work back

    in house - have never laid off

    when demand outstrips their capacity they turn

    work down

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    6/24

    Aggregate planning 6

    Examples: Grand Rapids Mold and Die

    3) GRMD (competes on speed)

    machine capacity set at maximum level of

    demand

    hire workers as they get busier and fire whenwork slows down

    only outsource if every machine is running 24

    hours a day- and then only until they can get

    another machine

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    7/24Aggregate planning 7

    Aggregate planning options: capacity

    Changing inventory levels

    Varying workforce size by hiring or firing

    Grand Rapids

    Construction unions Over and idle time

    why do companies prefer overtime to hiring new

    people?

    Part time or temps

    Adjunct faculty members

    Outsourcing

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    8/24Aggregate planning 8

    Outsourcing pluses and minuses

    Pluses increased flexibility

    increased quality (?)

    decreased costs (?)

    Minuses

    decreased control

    can be very expensive in certain situations suppliers can become competitors

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    9/24Aggregate planning 9

    Aggregate planning options: demand

    management

    Directly influence demand

    promotions

    early bird specials and happy hour

    Back-orders

    MTO verses MTS

    Product mixing Sea-doo / Ski-doo

    The golf / ski shop

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    10/24Aggregate planning 10

    Level verses chase strategies

    Level production strategies: if possible the best plan is to

    keep production level and use inventory or backlogs (noteDieCast is level with no inventory) to act as a buffer

    between production and demand.

    requires fairly stable demand (or very low inventory /

    backorder costs) why is this preferred

    Chase demand production strategies: vary the level of

    production to match demand using a combination of the

    previously discussed options. What must our capacity be to chase?

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    11/24Aggregate planning 11

    Methods of aggregate planning

    Mathematical approaches: a number of

    mathematical approaches to scheduling

    exist- but they are very complex, often donot work for large problems, and or take a

    very long time to run. So...

    Graphical / logical models tend to be usedin practice

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    12/24Aggregate planning 12

    An example

    Month Demand Productiondays Demand perday

    Jan. 900 22 41

    Feb. 700 18 39

    Mar. 800 21 38

    Apr. 1200 21 57

    May 1500 22 68

    June 1100 20 55

    Total 6200 124 50

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    13/24Aggregate planning 13

    Cost info. for example

    Inventory carrying costs $5 unit per month

    Subcontracting costs $10 unit

    Average pay rate $ 5 hour ($40 a day)

    Overtime pay rate $ 7 an hour (after 8 hours)

    Labor hours per unit 1.6

    units per day 5 per employee (8 hours)

    costs to hire an employee 500

    cost to fire an employee 700

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    14/24Aggregate planning 14

    A level demand strategy

    Produce 50 units a day - increasing inventory in

    Jan., Feb., and Mar., and decreasing it the last 3

    months

    Workers required = 10 per day no O.T. Beginning inventory and ending inventory = 0

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    15/24

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    16/24

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    17/24Aggregate planning 17

    Another option: outsourcing

    In this option we choose to set production atthe level of the lowest demand month (like

    DieCast) and outsource the remaining work.

    The lowest demand month is March wherewe make 38 units per day - so 38 units per

    day is our production plan.

    In order to achieve this we need 7.6 workers(38 /5)

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    18/24

    Aggregate planning 18

    Outsourcing costs

    In house production = 38 * 124 = 4712

    7.6 workers * $ 40 per day * 124 days = 37,696

    Outsourced production = 6200 - 4712 = 1488

    1488 * 10 unit = 14,880

    Total costs =

    37.696 + 14,880 = 52,576

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    19/24

    Aggregate planning 19

    Your turn

    Do a chase demand plan

    Use only whole employees

    Remember to include hire and fire costs

    Use overtime not idle time

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    20/24

    Aggregate planning 20

    Chase strategyDeman

    d

    Days Produc

    e

    Emplo

    yee

    RT OT Hire

    costs

    Fire

    costs

    Total

    900 22 41 8 7040 246.4 0 0 7286.4

    700 18 39 7 5040 806.4 0 700 6546.4

    800 21 38 7 5880 705.6 0 0 6585.6

    1200 21 57 11 9240 470.4 2000 0 11710.

    4

    1500 22 68 13 11440 739.2 1000 0 13179.

    21100 20 55 11 8800 0 0 1400 10200

    55508

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    21/24

    Aggregate planning 21

    Try this

    Use the same cost data but Add backorder costs of $10 a unit

    Plan split level: 1 level of production for

    Jan- March, a second for April June Use overtime not idle time

    If you did not want to have backorders what

    could you do?

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    22/24

    Aggregate planning 22

    The basics of the split plan

    Month day month Demand Inventorychange

    Endinginventory

    Jan. 39.34 865.57 900 -34.43 -34.43

    Feb. 39.34 708.2 700 8.2 -26.23

    Mar. 39.34 826.23 800 26.23 0

    Apr. 60.32 1266.67 1200 66.67 66.67

    May 60.32 1326.98 1500 -173.02 -106.35

    June 60.32 1206.35 1100 106.35 0

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    23/24

    Aggregate planning 23

    Costs for the split plan

    Employ

    ment

    RT OT Ending

    Invento

    ry

    Invento

    ry

    backord

    er

    hire Fire total

    7 6160 1070..4

    3

    -34.43 0 344 0 0 7574.69

    7 5040 875.80 -26.23 0 262 0 0 6178.1

    7 5880 1021.77 0 0 0 0 0 6901.77

    12 10080 74.67 66.67 333 0 2500 0 12988

    12 10560 78.22 -106.35 0 1063 0 0 11701.71

    12 9600 71.11 0 0 0 0 0 9671.11

    55015.38

  • 8/3/2019 Aggregate Planning Mark 2005

    24/24

    Aggregate planning 24

    Aggregate planning conclusions

    These were only a few of a number of

    options.

    We generally focused on the price

    Other goals besides lowest price ?

    customer service

    employee morale

    etc.

    Should be linked to strategy