Upload
hoangdat
View
222
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Wiley 2007
Aggregate Planning
Operations Management by
R. Dan Reid & Nada R. Sanders 3rd Edition © Wiley 2007
PowerPoint Presentation by R.B. Clough – UNH
M. E. Henrie - UAA
© Wiley 2007
Learning Objectives
Identify different aggregate planning strategies and options for
changing demand and/or capacity in aggregate plans
Develop aggregate plans, calculate associated costs, and
evaluate the plan in terms of operations, marketing, finance,
and human resources
© Wiley 2007
The Role of Aggregate Planning
Integral to part of the business planning process
Supports the strategic plan
Also known as the production plan
Identifies resources required for operations for the next 6 -18 months
Details the aggregate production rate and size of work force required
© Wiley 2007
Types of Aggregate Plans
1- Level Aggregate Plans
2- Chase Aggregate Plans
3- Hybrid Aggregate Plans
© Wiley 2007
Types of Aggregate Plans
1- Level Aggregate Plans
Maintains a constant workforce
Sets capacity to accommodate average demand
Often used for make-to-stock products like appliances
Disadvantage- builds inventory and/or uses back orders
© Wiley 2007
Level Plan Example
Level production rate= 28,000 units/7 periods= 4000 units
Level workforce= (4000 units x .64 std.)/160 = 16 people
Excess units = (Current output + Inventory ) – current demand = (4000 + 3500) – 6000 = 1500
© Wiley 2007
Types of Aggregate Plans
2- Chase Aggregate Plans
Produces exactly what is needed each period
Sets labor/equipment capacity to satisfy period demands
Disadvantage- constantly changing short term capacity
© Wiley 2007
Chase Plan Example
Chase hires and fires staff to exactly meet each periods demand
Period 1 = (500 units x .64 std.)/160 = 2 people, need to fire 16 people
Total = 50
© Wiley 2007
Types of Aggregate Plans (Cont.)
3- Hybrid Aggregate Plans
Uses a combination of options
Options should be limited to facilitate execution
May use a level workforce with overtime & temps
May allow inventory buildup and some backordering
May use short term sourcing
© Wiley 2007
Aggregate Planning Options
Demand based options
Reactive: uses finished goods inventories and
backorders for fluctuations
Proactive: shifts the demand patterns to minimize fluctuations e.g. early bird dinner prices at a restaurant
Capacity based options
Changes output capacity to meet demand
Uses overtime, under time, subcontracting, hiring, firing, and part-timers – cost and operational implications
© Wiley 2007
Evaluating the Current Situation
Important to evaluate current situation in terms of; Point of Departure
Current % of normal capacity Options are different depending on present situation
Magnitude of change Larger changes need more dramatic measures
Duration of change Is the length of time a brief seasonal change? Is a permanent change in capacity needed?
© Wiley 2007
Developing the Aggregate Plan
Step 1- Choose strategy: level, chase, or Hybrid
Step 2- Determine the aggregate production rate
Step 3- Calculate the size of the workforce
Step 4- Test the plan as follows: Calculate Inventory, expected hiring/firing, overtime needs
Calculate total cost of plan
Step 5- Evaluate performance: cost, service, human resources, and operations
© Wiley 2007
Plan for Companies with Tangible
Products – Plans A, B, C, D
Plan A: Level aggregate plan using inventories and back orders
Plan B: Level plan using inventories but no back orders
Plan C: Chase aggregate plan using hiring and firing
Plan D: Hybrid plan using initial workforce and overtime as needed
© Wiley 2007
Plan A - Level Using Inventory & Backorders (Table 13-5)
First calculate the level production rate (28000/7=4000)
© Wiley 2007
Plan A Evaluation
Fill rate is 83.9%
Fill rate is likely to low
Inventory levels seem to be okay
Human resources fires two employees
© Wiley 2007
Plan B Evaluation
Plan B costs slightly less than the level plan.
Hiring demands ranges from two in November to thirty-four in February
Utilization is highest, 70.6%, in December and even lower in the other months
Space and equipment are underutilized in every other month of the plan
© Wiley 2007
Aggregate Plans for Service Companies with Non-Tangible Products- Plans E, F, G
Options remain the same – level, chase, and hybrid plans Overtime and under time can be used
Staff can be hired and fired
Inventory cannot be used to level the service plan
All demand must be satisfied or lose business to a competing service provider
© Wiley 2007
Problem Data for Plans C, D, and E (Table 13-7)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A B
Cost Data
Regular time labor cost per hour $8.00
Overtime labor cost per hour $12.00
Subcontracting cost per unit (labor only) $60.00
Hiring cost per employee $250.00
Firing cost per employee $150.00
Capacity Data
Beginning workforce (employees) 60
Service standard per call (hours) 4
Regular time available per period (hours) 160
Overtime available per period (hours) 24
Demand Data (calls)
Period 1 2400
Period 2 1560
Period 3 1200
Period 4 2040
Period 5 2760
Period 6 1680
Period 7 1320
Period 8 2400
Total Number of Periods 8
© Wiley 2007
Plan C – Level Aggregate Plan with No Back Orders, No Tangible Product (Table 13-8)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
D E F G H I J K L M
Plan E: Level Aggregate Plan with No Backorders, No Tangible Product
Compute Workforce Needed
Maximum Demand 2760 <-- Need to staff to meet the maximum number of calls
Calls per Worker per Period (Reg Time) 40
Workers Needed 69
Number to Hire 9
Number to Fire 0
Detailed Plan Computations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Demand (calls) 2400 1560 1200 2040 2760 1680 1320 2400 15360
Service hours needed 9600 6240 4800 8160 11040 6720 5280 9600 61440
Regular time hours available 11040 11040 11040 11040 11040 11040 11040 11040
Undertime hours 1440 4800 6240 2880 0 4320 5760 1440 26880
Cost Calculations for Plan E
Regular time labor cost $706,560
Hiring cost $2,250
Firing cost $0
Total Cost $708,810
Period
Staff of 69 people creates excessive UT (averages 30% UT)
Cost per service call is $46.15 ($708,000 Divided by 15360 calls)
2400x4 =9,600 160x69 = 11040 Note: refer to Table 13-7 for value 4 and 69
© Wiley 2007
Plan D – Hybrid Aggregate Plan Using Initial Workforce and OT as Needed (Table 13-9)
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
D E F G H I J K L M
Plan F: Hybrid Aggregate Plan Using Initial Workforce and Overtime as Needed
Detailed Plan Computations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total
Demand (calls) 2400 1560 1200 2040 2760 1680 1320 2400 15360
Service hours needed 9600 6240 4800 8160 11040 6720 5280 9600 61440
Regular time hours of capacity 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 76800
Overtime hours needed 0 0 0 0 1440 0 0 0 1440
Undertime hours 0 3360 4800 1440 0 2880 4320 0 16800
Cost Calculations for Plan F
Regular time labor cost $614,400
Overtime labor cost $17,280
Total Cost $631,680
Period
Costs reduced by $77K and under time to an average of 20% Cost per service call reduced to $41.13 (-$5.02)
© Wiley 2007
Plan E – Chase Aggregate Plan for Nontangible Products Using Hiring and Firing (Table 13-10)
Total cost reduced by $114K over Plan F, utilization improved to 100%, and cost per service call now $33.72 (-$7.41)
Workforce fluctuates from 30-69 people- morale problems Solution?? Compare smaller permanent workforce, more OT??
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
D E F G H I J K L
Plan G: Chase Aggregate Plan Using Hiring and Firing
Beginning Number of Employees 60
Detailed Plan Computations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Demand (calls) 2400 1560 1200 2040 2760 1680 1320 2400
Service hours needed 9600 6240 4800 8160 11040 6720 5280 9600
Number of employees needed 60 39 30 51 69 42 33 60
Number of hires 0 0 0 21 18 0 0 27
Number of fires 0 21 9 0 0 27 9 0
Cost Calculations for Plan G
Regular time labor cost $491,520
Hiring cost $16,500
Firing cost $9,900
Total Cost $517,920
Period