19
Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Agents

CPSC 386 Artificial IntelligenceEllen WalkerHiram College

Page 2: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Agents

• An agent perceives its environment through sensors, and acts upon it through actuators.

• The agent’s percepts are its impression of the sensor input.

• (The agent doesn’t necessarily know everything in its environment)

• Agents may have knowledge and/or memory

Page 3: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

A Simple Vacuum Cleaner Agent

• 2 Locations, A and B• Dirt sensor (current location only)• Agent knows where it is• Actions: left, right, suck

• “Knowledge” represented by percept, action pairs(e.g. [A, dirty] -> (suck))

Page 4: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Agent Function vs. Agent Program

• Agent function:– Mathematical abstraction f(percepts) = action

– Externally observable (behavior)

• Agent program:– Concrete implementation of an algorithm that decides what the agent will do

– Runs within a “physical system”– Not externally observable (thought)

Page 5: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Rational Agents

• Rational Agents “do the right thing” based on– Performance measure that defines criterion of success

– The agent’s prior knowledge of the environment

– Actions that the agent can perform– Agent’s percept sequence to date

• Rationality is not omniscience; it optimizes expected performance, based on (necessarily) incomplete information.

Page 6: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Program for an Agent

• Repeat forever1. Record latest percept from sensors

into memory2. Choose best action based on memory3. Record action in memory4. Perform action (observe results)

• Almost all of AI elaborates this!

Page 7: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

A Reasonable Vacuum Program

• [A, dirty] -> suck• [B, dirty] -> suck• [A, clean] -> right• [B, clean] -> left

• What goals will this program satisfy?• What are pitfalls, if any?• Does a longer history of percepts help?

Page 8: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Aspects of Agent Behavior

• Information gathering - actions that modify future percepts

• Learning - modifying the program based on actions and perceived results

• Autonomy - agent’s behavior depends on its own percepts, rather than designer’s programming (a priori knowledge)

Page 9: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Specifying Task Environment

• Performance measure• Environment (real world or “artificial”)• Actuators• Sensors

• Examples:– Pilot– Rat in a maze– Surgeon– Search engine

Page 10: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Properties of Environments

• Fully vs. partially observable (e.g. map?)

• Single-agent vs. multi-agent– Adversaries (competitive)– Teammates (cooperative)

• Deterministic vs. stochastic – May appear stochastic if only partially observable (e.g. card game)

– Strategic: deterministic except for other agents

• (Uncertain = not fully observable, or nondeterministic)

Page 11: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Properties (cont)

• Episodic vs. Sequential – Do we need to know history?

• Static vs. Dynamic – Does environment change while agent is thinking?

• Discrete vs. Continuous– Time, space, actions

• Known vs. Unknown– Does the agent know the “rules” or “laws of physics”?

Page 12: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Examples

• Solitaire• Driving• Conversation• Chess• Internet search• Lawn mowing

Page 13: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Agent Types

• Reflex• Model-based Reflex• Goal based• Utility based

Page 14: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Reflex Agent

AgentEnviron-

mentsensors

effectors

world now

action now

rules

Page 15: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Model-Based Reflex Agent

AgentEnviron-

mentsensors

effectors

world now

action now

rules

state

how world evolves

what actions do

Page 16: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Goal Based

AgentEnviron-

mentsensors

effectors

world now

action now

goals

state

how world evolves

what actions do future world

Page 17: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Utility Based

AgentEnviron-

mentsensors

effectors

world now

action now

utility

state

how world evolves

what actions do future world

"happiness"

Page 18: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Learning Agent

PerformanceElement

(was agent)

Environment

Critic

LearningElement

Problem Generator

L. Goals

Feedback

Sensors

Effectors

changes

know-ledge

Page 19: Agents CPSC 386 Artificial Intelligence Ellen Walker Hiram College

Classes of Representations

• Atomic– State is indivisible

• Factored– State consists of attributes and values

• Structured– State consists of objects (which have attributes and relate to other objects)