AGENDA NFPA Technical Correlating Committee on Safety to ... · Equipment in Dwelling Units, has been placed under the purview of the Signaling Systems Technical Correlating Committee

AGENDA

NFPA Technical Correlating Committee on Safety to Life March 31, 2010 ROP Meeting The Westin O’Hare, Rosemont, IL

1. Call to Order. Call meeting to order by Chair William Koffel at 8:00 a.m. on

Wednesday, March 31 at the Westin O’Hare, Rosemont, IL.

2. Introduction of Members and Guests. For a current committee roster see page 02.

3. Minutes Approval.

a. Approve minutes of January 9, 2008 meeting. For a copy of the meeting minutes see page 05.

b. Approve minutes of June 30, 2009 meeting. For a copy of the meeting minutes without attachments (pages 1 through 12 of 31 only) see page 10.

4. Liaison Reports. Receive fire alarm committee liaison (Wayne Moore and Shane Clary)

and sprinkler committee liaison (Bill Koffel) reports.

5. Consistency of Formatting of List-Based Provisions.

6. Standardization of Language Where Supervision of Sprinkler Systems is Required.

7. Retail Sale of Consumer Fireworks.

8. Health Care Trends Summit.

9. ASME Symposium on Emergency Use of Elevators.

10. Release of NFPA 101 ROP. Review work of technical committees and develop needed TCC notes. For a copy of staff-prepared draft TCC notes see page 22. For a copy of the draft ROP see page 47.

11. Other Business.

12. Future Meetings and Revision Schedule Update. For 2012 edition revision cycle

schedule and technical committee ROC meeting schedule see page 308.

13. Adjournment.

Page 1 of 310

Address List No PhoneSafety to Life SAF-AAC

Ron Coté3/4/2010

SAF-AACWilliam E. KoffelChairKoffel Associates, Inc.6522 Meadowridge Road, Suite 101Elkridge, MD 21075

SE 1/1/1992SAF-AAC

Ron CotéSecretary (Staff-Nonvoting)National Fire Protection Association1 Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471

1/1/1991

SAF-AACDavid S. CollinsPrincipalThe Preview Group, Inc.632 Race StreetCincinnati, OH 45202American Institute of Architects

SE 3/4/2009SAF-AAC

Wayne D. HolmesPrincipalHSB Professional Loss Control508 Parkview DriveBurlington, NC 27215

I 4/17/1998

SAF-AACHoward HopperPrincipalUnderwriters Laboratories Inc.455 East Trimble RoadSan Jose, CA 95131-1230Alternate: John F. Bender

RT 1/15/1999SAF-AAC

Kenneth E. IsmanPrincipalNational Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc.40 Jon Barrett RoadPatterson, NY 12563Alternate: Jeffrey M. Hugo

M 4/3/2003

SAF-AACThomas W. JaegerPrincipalJaeger and Associates, LLC11902 Holly Spring DriveGreat Falls, VA 22066American Health Care Association

U 1/1/1991SAF-AAC

J. Edmund Kalie, Jr.PrincipalPrince George's County Government1220 Carroway Court, Room 1050Largo, MD 20774

E 7/17/1998

SAF-AACDavid C. LindPrincipalNorth Shore Fire Department665 East Brown Deer RoadBayside, WI 53217International Fire Marshals Association

E 8/5/2009SAF-AAC

George H. McCallPrincipalWade Hampton Fire DepartmentNine Stratton PlaceGreenville, SC 29615International Association of Fire Chiefs

U 4/14/2005

SAF-AACJake PaulsPrincipalJake Pauls Consulting Services in Building Use & Safety12507 Winexburg Manor Drive, Suite 201Silver Spring, MD 20906American Public Health AssociationAlternate: Stanley C. Harbuck

C 10/4/2001SAF-AAC

James R. QuiterPrincipalArup560 Mission Street, Floor 7San Francisco, CA 94105Alternate: Martin H. Reiss

SE 1/1/1992

SAF-AACTodd C. ShearerPrincipalTyco/SimplexGrinnell30 Lynn DriveOcean, NJ 07712-7233National Electrical Manufacturers Association

M 7/14/2004SAF-AAC

John F. BenderAlternateUnderwriters Laboratories Inc.8 Pleasant Wind CourtAberdeen, MD 21001Principal: Howard Hopper

RT 7/26/2007

1

Page 2 of 310


Ron Coté3/4/2010

SAF-AACStanley C. HarbuckAlternateSchool of Building InspectionPO Box 1643Salt Lake City, UT 84110American Public Health AssociationPrincipal: Jake Pauls

C 11/2/2006SAF-AAC

Jeffrey M. HugoAlternateNational Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc.1088 West Borton RoadEssexville, MI 48732Principal: Kenneth E. Isman

M 7/26/2007

SAF-AACMartin H. ReissAlternateThe RJA Group, Inc.1661 Worcester Road, Suite 501Framingham, MA 01701-5401Principal: James R. Quiter

SE 7/1/1993SAF-AAC

John A. AldermanNonvoting MemberAon/Schirmer Engineering Corporation6455 South Shore Blvd., Suite 400League City, TX 77573-5525

I 3/4/2009

SAF-AACChad E. BeebeNonvoting MemberWashington State Department of HealthConstruction Review ServicesPO Box 47852Olympia, WA 98504-7852TC on Board & Care Facilities

E 3/4/2009SAF-AAC

Warren D. BonischNonvoting MemberAon/Schirmer Engineering Corporation1701 North Collins Blvd., Suite 235Richardson, TX 75080-3553TC on Residential Occupancies

I 10/27/2005

SAF-AACKenneth E. BushNonvoting MemberMaryland State Fire Marshals Office301 Bay Street, Lower LevelEaston, MD 21601TC on Mercantile & Business Occupancies

E 4/17/1998SAF-AAC

Wayne G. CarsonNonvoting MemberCarson Associates, Inc.35 Horner Street, Suite 120Warrenton, VA 20186-3415TC on Fundamentals

SE 3/4/2009

SAF-AACMichael DiMascioNonvoting MemberArup Fire955 Mass AvenueCambridge, MA 02139TC on Detention & Correctional Occupancies

SE 10/27/2005SAF-AAC

Joseph M. JardinNonvoting MemberFire Department City of New York16 Dexter CourtHauppauge, NY 11788TC on Building Service & Fire Protection Equipment

C 3/4/2009

SAF-AACDavid P. KleinNonvoting MemberUS Department of Veterans Affairs810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 800Mail Code: (10NS)Washington, DC 20420TC on Health Care Occupancies

U 3/4/2009SAF-AAC

James K. LathropNonvoting MemberKoffel Associates, Inc.81 Pennsylvania AvenueNiantic, CT 06357TC on Means of Egress

SE 1/12/2000

2

Page 3 of 310


Ron Coté3/4/2010

SAF-AACWayne D. MooreNonvoting MemberHughes Associates, Inc.117 Metro Center Boulevard, Suite 1002Warwick, RI 02886-2207Signaling Systems Correlating CommitteeAlternate: Shane M. Clary

SE 7/26/2007SAF-AAC

Henry PaszczukNonvoting MemberConnecticut Department of Public Safety1111 Country Club RoadMiddletown, CT 06457TC on Furnishings & Contents

E 08/05/2009

SAF-AACEric R. RosenbaumNonvoting MemberHughes Associates, Inc.3610 Commerce Drive, Suite 817Baltimore, MD 21227-1652TC on Fire Protection Features

SE 1/16/2003SAF-AAC

Aleksy L. SzachnowiczNonvoting MemberAnne Arundel County Public Schools2644 Riva RoadAnnapolis, MD 21401TC on Educational & Day-Care Occupancies

U 10/27/2005

SAF-AACJeffrey S. TubbsNonvoting MemberArup Fire955 Massachusetts Avenue, 4th FloorCambridge, MA 02139TC on Assembly Occupancies & Membrane Structures

SE 3/4/2009SAF-AAC

Joseph H. VersteegNonvoting MemberVersteeg Associates86 University DriveTorrington, CT 06790TC on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety

E 3/4/2009

SAF-AACShane M. ClaryAlt. to Nonvoting MemberBay Alarm Company60 Berry DrivePacheco, CA 94553Signaling Systems Correlating CommitteePrincipal: Wayne D. Moore

IM 7/26/2007SAF-AAC

John L. BryanMember Emeritus2399 Bear Den RoadFrederick, MD 21701-9328

SE 1/1/1975

SAF-AACHarold E. NelsonMember Emeritus4217 Kings Mill LaneAnnandale, VA 22003

SE 1/1/1992SAF-AAC

Ron CotéStaff LiaisonNational Fire Protection Association1 Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471

1/1/1991

3

Page 4 of 310

SAF-AAC January 9, 2008 ROC Meeting Minutes / Page 1

MINUTES NFPA Technical Correlating Committee on Safety to Life

January 9, 2008 ROC Meeting Orlando, FL

1. Call to Order.

The meeting was called to order by Chair James Quiter at 8:05 a.m. on January 9, 2008 at the Rosen Plaza Hotel, Orlando, FL.

2. Introduction of Members and Guests.

The following technical correlating committee members were present:

NAME REPRESENTING James Quiter Chair

Arup

Ron Coté Nonvoting Secretary

NFPA

Warren Bonisch Nonvoting TC Chair

Schirmer Engineering Corporation Rep. TC on Residential Occupancies

Kenneth Bush Principal

Maryland State Fire Marshals Office Rep. International Fire Marshals Association

Shane Clary Alternate to Nonvoting Member W. Moore

Bay Alarm Company Rep. Signaling Systems Correlating Committee

Michael DiMascio Nonvoting TC Chair

Arup Fire Rep. TC on Detention and Correctional Occupancies

William Fitch Nonvoting TC Chair

Phyrefish Enterprises, Inc. Rep. TC on Furnishings and Contents

Ralph Gerdes Nonvoting TC Chair

Ralph Gerdes Consultants, LLC Rep. TC on Assembly Occupancies and Membrane Structures

Wayne Holmes Nonvoting TC Chair

HSB Professional Loss Control Rep. TC on Industrial, Storage, and Miscellaneous Occupancies

Howard Hopper Principal

Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.

Morgan Hurley Nonvoting TC Chair

Society of Fire Protection Engineers Rep. TC on Fundamentals

J. Edmund Kalie Principal

Prince George’s County, MD Government

Page 5 of 310


William Koffel Principal

Koffel Associates, Inc.

James Lathrop Nonvoting TC Chair

Koffel Associates, Inc. Rep. TC on Means of Egress

George McCall Principal

Wade Hampton Fire Department Rep. International Association of Fire Chiefs

Wayne Moore Nonvoting Member

Hughes Associates, Inc. Rep. Signaling Systems Correlating Committee

Jake Pauls Principal

Jake Pauls Consulting Services in Building Use and Safety – Rep. American Public Health Association

Lawrence Perry Principal

Building Owners & Managers Association International

Eric Rosenbaum Nonvoting TC Chair

Hughes Associates, Inc. Rep. TC on Fire Protection Features

The following technical correlating committee members were absent:

NAME REPRESENTING Richard Bukowski Principal

US National Institute of Standards and Technology – Rep. Signaling Systems Correlating Committee

Kenneth Isman Principal

National Fire Sprinkler Association

Phillip Jose Nonvoting TC Chair

Self Rep. TC on Board and Care Occupancies

Richard Klinker Nonvoting TC Chair

Klinker and Associates, Inc. Rep. TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment

Daniel O’Connor Nonvoting TC Chair

Schirmer Engineering Corporation Rep. TC on Health Care Occupancies

Kirby Perry Principal

Kirby W. Perry Architects & Associates, Inc. Rep. American Institute of Architects

Todd Shearer Principal

Tyco/Simplex Grinnell Rep. Nat’l Electrical Manufacturers Assn.

Aleksy Szachnowicz Nonvoting TC Chair

Anne Arundel County Public Schools Rep. TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies

The following guests were in attendance:

NAME REPRESENTING Ryan Alles Safe Evacuation Coalition Dave Collins The Preview Group, Inc.

American Institute of Architects David De Vries Firetech Engineering, Inc. David Frable U.S. General Services Administration Tom Jaeger Jaeger & Associates, LLC Gerald Jones Code Resource Support Committee/ NIBS

Page 6 of 310


John Loscheider Loscheider Engineering Co. / NCSEA Robert Solomon NFPA Staff

3. Approval of Minutes.

The minutes of the April 12, 2007 meeting were approved as written and distributed. 4. Liaison Reports.

The fire alarm code liaison report was presented by new nonvoting members Wayne Moore and Shane Clary, representing the Signaling Systems Technical Correlating Committee.

A new Chapter 12 is being added to NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code, on emergency communication systems, including mass notification.

The controversy on use of ionization versus photoelectric smoke detectors/alarms in residential occupancies has been addressed by a Research Foundation study. Discussions to date have been emotional. The subject needs to be decided on an occupancy-related basis.

NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Warning Equipment in Dwelling Units, has been placed under the purview of the Signaling Systems Technical Correlating Committee. There is ongoing discussion about combining it with NFPA 72.

NFPA 731, Standard for the Installation of Electronic Premises Security Systems, has not been placed under the purview of the Signaling Systems Technical Correlating Committee.

The sprinkler installation standards liaison report was presented by Bill Koffel.

Pre-ROP meetings for the current cycle of NFPA 13 were held. The ROP meetings are scheduled for late January.

NFPA 13 and NFPA 101 have been correlated on the subject of closely spaced sprinklers for the protection of vertical openings and the associated use of draft curtains

Bill agreed to take to the appropriate NFPA 13 task group the subject of exempting sprinklers in elevator machine rooms where the elevators are to be used for occupant evacuation and by emergency responders.

5. Update on NFPA 101A.

New SAF-ALS Chair Bill Koffel reported. NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, is being revised in the June 2009 revision cycle (1 year after NFPA 101 to permit NFPA 101A-2010 to reflect the provisions of NFPA 101-2009). The ROP is currently being balloted by the TC and includes committee proposals to fine-tune the FSESs to measure equivalency against the 2009 edition of NFPA 101 and to update materials missed in earlier revisions. The TCC will be letter balloted after the TC completes its balloting.

6. Fire Protection Research Foundation Projects.

The TCC noted that FPRF is soliciting proposals for research work funded by NFPA. The committee asked to receive the link to the following Research Foundation report: Public Perceptions of High-Rise Building Safety and Emergency Evacuation Procedures

Page 7 of 310


(PDF, 890 KB). The report documents a survey of high-rise building occupants to explore their general knowledge of high-rise building safety and emergency evacuation procedures, and their attitudes and perceptions toward them. (2007).

http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//PDF/Research/NuStats_Final_HighRise.pdf

7. System Commissioning.

The new technical committee will hold its second meeting at the end of March.

8. Life Safety Branch of Electrical System. TCC Chair Jim Quiter will name a representative to the new task group being formed by the Standards Council. Jerry Wooldridge, Chair of the Building Code TCC, also will name a representative to the task group.

9. Referenced Standards Task Group Report.

The report was accepted are published in the agenda. The TCC will be letter balloted on incorporating the new provisions into the Supplemental Operating Procedures.

10. Extracting Text.

The committee took no action on the recommendation received from the Fundamentals Committee.

11. Release of NFPA 101 ROC.

The committee reviewed the 444 active comments and technical committee actions. The committee approved the creation of 116 TCC action notes. See the ROC-release ballot for the details.

12. Other Business.

The committee offered thanks to the following chairs whose terms will end with this revision cycle due to the tenure policy.

Jim Quiter – SAF-AAC Bill Fitch – SAF-FUR Ralph Gerdes – SAF-AXM Wayne Holmes – SAF-IND Morgan Hurley – SAF-FUN Phil Jose – SAF-BCF Dick Klinker – SAF-BSF Dan O’Connor – SAF-HEA

13. Next Meeting and Revision Schedule Update.

Notices of intent to make a motion (NITMAMs) must be filed with NFPA by April 4. The Association will address the documents on June 4-5 at the World Safety Congress and Exhibition (WSC&E) in Las Vegas. Association amendments will be balloted by the affected TCs and the TCC in June. Standards Council hearings will be in Quincy, MA in July.

Page 8 of 310


The TCC will meet by teleconference some time in 2009 for purposes of directing the TCs to address subjects/issues for the next revision cycle.

14. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 11:40 a.m. Minutes prepared by Ron Coté, P.E., Nonvoting Secretary

Page 9 of 310

MINUTES OF THE NFPA BUILDING CODE AND THE NFPA LIFE SAFETY CODE

TECHNICAL CORRELATING COMMITTEE PLANNING MEETING

JUNE 30, 2009

Item 1, Call to Order The Planning Meeting for the 2011 editions of NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 was called to order by the Chair of the Building Code Technical Correlating Committee, Jim Quiter and the Chair of the Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee, Bill Koffel at 1:04 p.m. on Tuesday, June 30, 2009. Item 2, Introduction of Members and Guests Jim Quiter and Bill Koffel, Chairs, thanked the members for their participation. A roll call for the Building Code Technical Correlating Committee and the Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee was conducted. The following Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Principal, Alternate and Nonvoting members participated:

NAME COMPANY James Quiter, Chair Arup

Jerry Wooldridge, Secretary Reedy Creek Improvement District Robert Bourke, Principal Lynn Fire Department/Representing

International Fire Marshals Association David S. Collins, Principal The Preview Group, Inc./Representing

American Institute of Architects Salvatore DiCristina, Principal Rutgers, The State University of New

Jersey/Representing Building Code Development Committee

Dave Frable, Principal U.S. General Services Administration Sam W. Francis, Principal American Forest & Paper Association

Page 10 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 2

J.C. Harrington, Principal FM Global Howard Hopper, Principal Underwriters Laboratories Inc.

Jeffrey Hugo, Principal National Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc. Jonathan Humble, Principal American Iron and Steel Institute Cristel K. Hunter, Principal Alcan Cable/Representing National

Electrical Manufacturers Association Gerald H. Jones, Principal Building Seismic Safety Council/Code

Resources Support Committee John E. Kampmeyer, Principal Triad Fire Protection Engineering

Corp./Representing National Society of Professional Engineers

Russell Leavitt, Principal TVA Fire and Life Safety, Inc./Representing American Fire Sprinkler

Association Michael T. Newman, Principal Johnson & Johnson/Representing NFPA

Industrial Fire Protection Section Jake Pauls, Principal Jake Pauls Consulting Services in Building

Use & Safety/Representing American Public Health Association

Stephen Skalko, Voting Alternate Portland Cement Association John Bender, Alternate to H. Hopper Underwriters Laboratories Inc.

Kathleen Eckert, Alternate to M. Newman Bank of NY/Representing NFPA Industrial Fire Protection Section

Roland Huggins, Alternate to R. Leavitt American Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc. Bonnie E. Manley, Alternate to R. Wills American Iron and Steel Institute

Dennis Pitts, Alternate to S. Francis American Forest & Paper Association Leon Vinci, Alternate to J. Pauls Health Promotion

Consultants/Representing American Public Health Association

Chad E. Beebe, Nonvoting Member Washington State Department of Health/Representing Technical Committee

on Board & Care Facilities Kenneth Bush, Nonvoting Maryland State Fire Marshals

Office/Representing Technical Committee on Mercantile and Business Occupancies

Michael DiMascio, Nonvoting Arup Fire/Representing Technical Committee on Detention and Correctional

Occupancies David Klein, Nonvoting US Department of Veterans

Affairs/Representing TC on Health Care Occupancies

Page 11 of 310


William Koffel, Nonvoting Koffel Associates, Inc./Representing Safety to Life Correlating Committee

James K. Lathrop, Nonvoting Koffel Associates, Inc./Representing Technical Committee on Means of Egress

Jeffrey S. Tubbs, Nonvoting Member Arup Fire/Representing Technical Committee on Assembly Occupancies &

Membrane Structures Peter J. Willse, Nonvoting XL Global Asset Protection

Services//Representing Technical Committee on Structures, Construction &

Materials The following Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Principal Members did not participate:

NAME COMPANY Raymond N. Hansen, Principal U.S. Department of the Air Force Thomas W. Jaeger, Principal Jaeger and Associates, LLC/Representing

American Health Care Association Daniel Troxell, Voting Alternate Washington, DC Fire Department/Representing

NFPA Fire Service Section The following Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Principal, Alternate and Nonvoting members participated:

NAME COMPANY William Koffel, Chair Koffel Associates, Inc.

David S. Collins, Principal The Preview Group, Inc./Representing American Institute of Architects

Howard Hopper, Principal Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Kenneth Isman, Principal National Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc.

J. Edmund Kalie, Jr., Principal Prince George’s County Government George McCall, Principal Wade Hampton Fire Department, Representing

International Association of Fire Chiefs Jake Pauls, Principal Jake Pauls Consulting Services in Building Use

& Safety/Representing American Public Health Association

Larry Perry, Principal Building Owners & Managers Association International

James Quiter, Principal Arup

Page 12 of 310


Todd Shearer, Principal Tyco/SimplexGrinnell/Representing National Electrical Manufacturers Association

John Bender, Alternate to H. Hopper Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Jeffrey Hugo, Principal National Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc.

Chad E. Beebe, Nonvoting Member Washington State Department of Health/Representing Technical Committee on

Board & Care Facilities Kenneth Bush, Nonvoting Maryland State Fire Marshals

Office/Representing Technical Committee on Mercantile and Business Occupancies

Michael DiMascio, Nonvoting Arup Fire/Representing Technical Committee on Detention and Correctional Occupancies

David Klein, Nonvoting US Department of Veterans Affairs/Representing TC on Health Care

Occupancies James K. Lathrop, Nonvoting Koffel Associates, Inc./Representing Technical

Committee on Means of Egress Jeffrey S. Tubbs, Nonvoting Member Arup Fire/Representing Technical Committee

on Assembly Occupancies & Membrane Structures

Shane M. Clary, Alternate to Nonvoting Member W. Moore

Bay Alarm Company/Representing Signaling Systems Correlating Committee

The following Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Principal Member did not participate:

Thomas W. Jaeger, Principal Jaeger and Associates, LLC/Representing American Health Care Association

The following NFPA staff was in attendance:

Kristin Collette Ron Coté

Allan Fraser Tracy Golinveaux Diane Matthews Robert Solomon

Page 13 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 5 Item 3, Opening Remarks/Agenda Review Jim Quiter noted that this meeting kicks off the next cycle (A2011) for NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000. There are several new people in new positions including Technical Correlating Committee and Technical Committee chairs. Robert Solomon opened the meeting with welcoming remarks, an explanation of the Microsoft Live Meeting process and a brief agenda review. Robert noted the purpose of the meeting was to do a fly over of pending issues, identify topics committees will be reviewing in the next cycle as well as some topics from previous editions Item 4, Approval of Minutes The minutes of the Building Code Technical Correlating Committee January 8, 2008 ROC Meeting (Enclosure A without attachments) and the Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee January 9, 2008 ROC Meeting (Enclosure B) were approved as submitted. Item 5, Meeting Schedules/Critical Dates Robert noted that the NFPA 101/NFPA 5000 schedules (Enclosure C) were developed within the confines of the NFPA Master A2011 schedule in order to ensure certain critical dates are met. The ROP meeting schedule was planned so that major activity overlap was avoided, such as the ICC meetings in October and November, 2009. Core committees meet earlier to give staff time to prepare draft chapters for the occupancy committees to review and accept or modify. The ROP meetings are in September and December with balloting to follow the respective meetings. The Building Code and Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committees must have their meetings by April 16th, 2010. The Technical Committee ROC meetings will be held after September 3rd, 2010. Item 6, Global Issues - Administrative Robert stated that there has been back and forth discussion on the form and format for the online submission of proposals and comments. A custom template in which all information is pre-populated is in development and committee members may be asked to test this. This would make life easier for everyone. At the present, members wishing to submit proposals or comments should continue to download the current form available on the NFPA website.

Page 14 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 6 Item 6, Global Issues – Administrative (continued) Online balloting had been tried for the NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 2009 editions. Some aspects worked, others didn’t. The NEC recently tested online balloting which worked well overall. The plan is to have online balloting available for the NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 ROP balloting. Demonstrations will be available at the September and December meetings presuming the systems are in place. Item 7, Global Issues - Technical High Rise

As a result of the August, 2008 Standards Council decision that the subject of high-rise be revisited with regard to what committee should be responsible, a decision needs to be made if and where the responsibility for the high-rise criteria should be moved. Some NFPA 101 Chapter 11 sections may be shifted to other committees as well. Robert stated that high-rise building criteria under the Industrial, Storage and Miscellaneous Occupancies Technical Committee worked well until certain issues concerning high rise occupancies received more attention. There were also some coordination issues. Provisions relating to high-rise buildings have the potential to impact all occupancies thus they should fall into the same category as a core chapter. At present, the high-rise topics are handled at the ROP and ROC stage when the occupancy committees are meeting. The result is that extensive action by the Technical Correlating Committees becomes necessary on this subject since the “normal” coordination effort between the core and occupancy chapters does not occur.

Robert asked if these issues are more appropriately covered by a core chapter committee rather than an occupancy chapter committee. A discussion ensued. Dave Collins stated there are special design conditions shared by several occupancy committees. Not one or another, but all of these are involved. None fall within the appropriate category. Dave asked if we needed a new, special construction committee. Roland Huggins asked the issues be clarified. Robert noted there were contentious issues, i.e. elevator lobbies and exit stair width among others that required additional coordination at the TCC ROP and ROC stages. On several occasions, the topics were eventually the subject of an appeal to the Standards Council.

Page 15 of 310


Item 7, Global Issues – Technical (continued)

Jake Pauls made a Motion (Motion #1) that High-Rise should be moved to the Fundamentals Technical Committee. He felt this is a timing issue as Fundamentals meets early in the process and can direct work to other committees as appropriate. Ken Isman mentioned the possibility of another (new) Technical Committee devoted to these issues alone. In related discussion, Jim Quiter noted that high-rise is not moving out of Chapter 11 (NFPA 101) and Chapter 33 (NFPA 5000), only who is responsible. Other options were discussed including having the Industrial, Storage and Miscellaneous Occupancies Technical Committee meet with core chapters or to move it to the Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment committee. Robert Solomon noted that the next option for a new committee to be created and populated is October of 2009 so there would be no opportunity to create a new committee until that time. Ron Coté noted that the Fundamentals committee has been given many challenges over the years including being charged with developing the performance based design criteria and the rehab provisions in Chapter 15 (NFPA 5000) and Chapter 43 (NFPA 101). Should a new committee be developed, members would be drawn from the same pool, spreading the members thin. If high-rise stays with the Industrial Committee, they would need to meet twice so all occupancy chapters would have the opportunity to react to any changes that were proposed. The second meeting would be a few months later when other changes have jelled. Jake Pauls said he agreed with this assessment. He felt quite a few Fundamentals members have significant experience in high-rise. Robert noted Chip Carson is in favor of getting this under the purview of Fundamentals as well. Ron reiterated some of the biggest challenges handled by the Fundamentals Committee were goals and objectives and performance based designs. A vote was taken (via roll call) on Jake’s Motion (Motion #1) to assign high-rise to the Fundamentals Technical Committee. The Building Code Technical Correlating Committee (BLD-AAC) voted 11 in favor and 4 opposed. The Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee (SAF-AAC) voted 2 in favor, 5 opposed. Ron stated that the Technical Correlating Committees should convey the best possible information to the Standards Council. A straw vote was taken to get a sense from the Technical Correlating Committee members to find out if there was

Page 16 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 8 Item 7, Global Issues – Technical (continued)

agreement to move the responsibility from the IND committee to another, as yet to be determined committee within the project. The options included giving the responsibility to Fundamentals, Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment or creation of the aforementioned new committee. John Kampmeyer made a Motion with a 2 part question. The first was whether or not High-Rise should stay where it is or be moved to a core committee. By roll call, the committee unanimously decided it belongs as a core committee issue so this passed. The second part asked each member to weigh in on where it should be moved. The results of the voting members showed: 12 members in favor of moving to Fundamentals, 11 in favor of forming a new committee and 2 in favor of moving it to the Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment Technical Committee. Membrane Structures and Tents and Remaining Sections The placement of Membrane Structures and Tents and remaining sections in Chapter 11 of 101 and Chapters 31 and 32 in NFPA 5000 were discussed. Discussion included moving special structures under the IND Committee to be consistent with high-rise. Edmund Kalie made an a motion to move certain portions of Chapters 31 and 32 of NFPA 5000 and the remaining sections of Chapter 11 in NFPA 101 to be consistent with whatever actions are taken on high rise. That motion failed. Robert and Ron have noted the issues discussed and the Technical Correlating Committee’s recommendations will be noted in a report to the Standards Council. Standardization of Language Where Supervision of Sprinkler Systems Is Required Robert asked the above be noted on each TC agenda to remind committees to seek consistency of references when mandating the installation of an automatic sprinkler system.

Page 17 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 9 Item 7, Global Issues – Technical (continued)

Consistency of List Based Options – i.e. when All Conditions Must Be Met or Some Conditions Must Be Met

Bill Koffel noted that the committees should be looking for consistent format. The committees should be reminded to specify exactly what is needed – if it’s necessary to meet all of the conditions or just 1 of the conditions when list type requirements are specified.

Item 8, Committee and Occupancy –Specific Subjects Technical Committee Chairs and/or Staff highlighted some of the subjects the individual technical committees would be discussing at the upcoming ROP meetings:

BLD/SAF-AXM Jeffrey Tubbs, TC Chair - Defining bars with live entertainment. - Jeff noted there really isn’t a certification for assembly crowd manager training (although IAAM does have one).

BLD/SAF-BCF Robert Solomon

- Fire-evacuation needs and planning will be highlighted. - Discussed the fire in Wells, NY that resulted in 4 fatalities.

BLD-BLC Robert Solomon - Consumer Fire Works was discussed. The Technical Committee on Pyrotechnics has to justify provisions in NFPA 1124. Several task groups have been formulated with members from Means of Egress and Building Construction appointed but at the present, we are waiting to hear from the Pyrotechnics Technical Committee to get back to us

BLD/SAF-BSF Robert Solomon - Robert noted new provisions in NFPA 72 are seeing broader use of mass notification systems. - In-building radio communications are being refined and this will be a topic of committee discussion.

Page 18 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 10 Item 8, Committee and Occupancy –Specific Subjects (continued)

BLD-BSY Allan Fraser

- Regarding ADA-ABA-AG updates, Allan noted the Access Board issued new guidelines in 2004 regarding building codes. However, we do not know what the DOJ (Department of Justice) will do with them or in what timeframe. - ICC/ANSI A117 updates. Allan stated that A117 is currently in cycle with a meeting scheduled for August. Further work needs to be done and the committee is hoping for calendar year completion. - Fire fighter elevators. Additional changes are anticipated from the ASME Task Groups that have been assigned to this effort.

BLD/SAF/DET Michael DiMascio, TC Chair, had no items to add at this time.

BLD/SAF-END Ron Coté

- Means of escape allowance/concept when used in day care occupancies.

BLD/SAF-FIR Robert Solomon - Smoke barrier leakage measurement rates. A small NFPA FPRF study had been done on this. Bill Koffel will be making a presentation to the committee. -Limitations on horizontal runs that coincide with a vertical opening.

BLD/SAF-FUN Robert Solomon

- Reassignment of special structures/high-rise chapters to FUN was previously discussed.

BLD/SAF-FUR No topics added.

BLD/SAF-HEA David Klein, TC Chair

- David noted nursing home culture changes are being made in an effort to make nursing homes more home like and less institutionalized. Cooking in open areas was mentioned as one example of a subject that would be discussed. -Omission of sprinklers in certain areas (per A-08 ROP 101-304 and 5000-154/ROC 101-256 and 5000-181) is a specific request from the TCC that this be revisited.

Page 19 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 11 Item 8, Committee and Occupancy –Specific Subjects (continued)

BLD/SAF-IND Robert Solomon - The provisions of NFPA 400 need to be tackled. Committee should extract information from NFPA 400 into Chapter 34 of NFPA 5000. The committee will deal with this at their ROP meeting.

BLD/SAF-MEA Jim Lathrop, TC Chair

- In addition to the items listed below, Jim requested to add patient movement devices in stairs. - Occupant evacuation elevators - Consumer fire works - Pressure differences in stair vestibules (per A-08 ROP 101-117a/ROC 101-75)

BLD/SAF-MER Ken Bush, TC Chair - Covered malls -Smoke control -Mass notification systems

BLD/SAF-RES Ron Coté

- Omission of sprinklers in certain small closets in new apartments (per A-08 ROP 101-379 and 5000-172a/ROC 101-327 and 5000-220). It was noted that the size limits in NFPA 13/NFPA 101/NFPA 5000 could be coordinated to the extent possible. - Separation of garage from living space in new single-family homes (per A-08 ROP 5000-162/ROC 5000-188, 5000-189)

BLD-SCM Peter Willse, TC Chair

- Peter noted that ASCE-7 2010 is still in the development process - Separation of garage from living space in new single-family homes (per A-08 ROP 5000-162/ROC 5000-188, 5000-189).

Item 9, Liaison Reports Bill Koffel reported that that 2010 Editions of NFPA 13, NFPA 13D and NFPA 13R were just approved during the NFPA meeting in Chicago. There are several appeals pending that will be heard during the NFPA Standards Council meeting in August. Some of the additional changes needed in NFPA 13 concerning sprinkler omissions in certain elevator shafts and equipment rooms were not processed in this cycle. The occupant

Page 20 of 310

Building Code Technical Correlating Committee Life Safety Code Technical Correlating Committee Planning Meeting June 30, 2009 Page 12 Item 9, Liaison Reports (continued) evacuation elevator and first responder elevator provisions in NFPA 101 and NFPA 5000 will have to evaluate the sprinkler provisions in order to make sure the differences are highlighted. Shane Clary reported that the 2010 Edition of NFPA 72 was just approved during the NFPA meeting in Chicago. There are several appeals pending that will be heard during the NFPA Standards Council meeting in August. While many substantial changes have been made to NFPA 72, some the highlights include:

-Additional criteria added for emergency communication and in building radio systems

-Revam ped criteria associated with mass notification systems -Clarified roles for spacing and location of detectors under beams and pockets of certain ceiling configurations. -At present, a TIA is being evaluated concerning alarm transmission on VOIP networks.

Item 10, Adjournment

The members who participated were thanked for their time and input during the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 4:15 p.m. Minutes prepared by Diane Matthews, Project Administrator

Page 21 of 310

of 25

NFPA 101® Life Safety Code® 2012 Edition – Report on Proposals (ROP)

Draft TCC Notes

Proposal Sequence No. 101-

Reference/ Paragraph

Involves Technical Committee

SAF-___

Draft Technical Correlating Committee

Note

8 various IND The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Part. Make the changes shown for Chapters 40 and 42. The SAF-IND technical committee has responsibility for only the portion of the recommendation related to Chapters 40 and 42. The other portions of the recommendation have been addressed by other technical committees in Proposals 101-1 through 101-7.

12 __.1.4s various The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that public comments be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-FUN, -AXM, -END, -HEA, -DET, -RES, -BCF, -MER and –IND. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Make any needed editorial changes to assure that the moved and renumbered text is correlated with the remainder of the chapter. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The action taken at the ROP stage by SAF-HEA will provide correlation among occupancy chapters, but may need to be correlated within each occupancy chapter.

12a 1.7 FUN, RES The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 14 voted affirmative, 8 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot

Page 22 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

was not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject. See the TCC Note on Proposal 101-13.

13 1.7 FUN, RES The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUN was challenged in Proposal 101-12a by SAF-RES. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-FUN go forward to the ROP.

17 2.2 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUN was revised in Proposal 101-17c by SAF-DET. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle - See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-17c.

17b 2.2 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 17 voted affirmative, 5 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle - The action on Proposal 101-17c (also offered by SAF-DET) better addresses the issue. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-17c.

17c 2.2 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 18 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 1 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

18 2.3.6 FUN The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action on this

Page 23 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

proposal be changed to Accept in Principle. See Proposals 101-19, 101-20 and 101-21 which make the needed changes more accurately and completely than this proposal.

22 2.3.6 The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle. See Proposals 101-19, 101-20 and 101-21 which make the needed changes more accurately and completely than this proposal.

24 2.4 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUN was challenged in Proposal 101-24a by SAF-DET. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-24a.

24a 2.4 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 18 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 1 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

25 Chapter 3 Various

FUN The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject. See Proposals 101-26 through 101-29. The Committee Meeting Action by SAF-FUN on this proposal says that the committee defers to the action by SAF-BSF, -RES, -BCF and -DET.

30a 3.3 Definition Wall or Ceiling

Covering

FUR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-FUR. Make the Recommendation for the comment read:

Page 24 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

Revise the definition to delete the parenthetical reference to vinyl and expand the annex text to accomplish the same intent Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The NFPA style manual does not permit list-like examples (in this case, the words “including vinyl”) as such language belongs in the annex.

30b 3.3 Definition Bldg Code

FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUN was further revised in Proposal 101-30d by SAF-DET. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-30d.

30c 3.3 Definition Fire Code

FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUN was further revised in Proposal 101-30d by SAF-DET. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-30d.

30d 3.3 Definition Bldg Code Fire Code

FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 22 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

36a 3.3 Definition Gross

Leasable Area

MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Revise the last sentence of the definition so that it begins with the words “All non-major tenant areas....” Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The last sentence of the definition currently starts with the words “all tenant

Page 25 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

areas” which include “major tenants” and then the newly added text adds in 50 percent of the major tenant areas so as to create a conflict in language.

40 3.3 Definition Contents and Furnishings

FUR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the Committee Statement needs to be forwarded to the Glossary of Terms (GOT) Technical Advisory Committee so that primary responsibility for the definition can be changed from NFPA 555 to NFPA 101.

45 3.3 Definition Interior finish

FUR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the last item in the Recommendation needs to be forwarded to the Glossary of Terms (GOT) Technical Advisory Committee so that primary responsibility for the definition can be changed from NFPA 850 to NFPA 101.

52 3.3 Definition Limited

Combustible Material

FIR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that public comments be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-FIR and SAF-FUN. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Revise the definition so that requirements are moved to the body of the code (new 4.6.14) as done for the term Noncombustible Material in Proposals 101-54a and 101-64. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: Requirements should not be part of a definition. The definition of Limited Combustible Material should be formatted like that of Noncombustible Material as done by Proposals 101-54a and 101-64.

64b 4.7 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 22 voted affirmative, 0

Page 26 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Reject on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

65a 5.5.3.1 FUN, FUR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the editorial change made by this proposal was not informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-FUR go forward to the ROP. Further, the TCC directs that a public comment on this proposal be submitted in the TCC's name to SAF-FUN. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Review the action on Proposal 101-65a for appropriateness. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: Text on a section under the primary responsibility of SAF-FUN was changed by another committee without an information ballot of SAF-FUN.

79 7.2.1.5.9.6 MEA, BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUN was proposed to be further revised by Proposal 101-79a by SAF-BCF. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-MEA go forward to the ROP. See the TCC Action that Rejects Proposal 101-79a.

79a 7.2.1.5.9.6 MEA, BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-MEA committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 28 voting members, 19 voted affirmative, 7 voted negative, 1 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed

Page 27 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

to Reject. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-79.

102 7.2.2.2.1.1 MEA, IND The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-MEA was challenged in Proposal 101-102a by SAF-IND. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-102a.

102a 7.2.2.2.1.1 MEA, IND The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-MEA committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 28 voting members, 27 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-IND go forward to the ROP.

125 Various FIR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the Committee Meeting Action of Reject applies only to the portion of the Recommendation related to 8.6.7 as that is the only provision recommended to be changed for which the SAF-FIR committee has responsibility.

129 Various BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the Committee Meeting Action of Reject applies only to the portions of the Recommendation related to Chapters 32 and 33 as those are the only provision recommended to be changed for which the SAF-BCF committee has responsibility.

134 Table 7.3.1.2 MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Develop an occupant load factor specific to “high density” call centers. Make the Substantiation for the comment

Page 28 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

read: The Comment on Affirmative submitted by SAF-MER member Frable correctly identifies the need to address non-typical, commercial office building work settings such as high-density call centers now that the occupant load factor for business occupancies is being changed from 100 sq ft per person to 150 sq ft per person.

135 Occupancy Chapters’

__.2.4

MEA The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the occupancy chapter technical committees made the necessary changes, addressed in the Committee Statement for this proposal, via committee–generated proposals.

161a [See 418]

7.14.1 [formerly Annex B]

MEA, HEA The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-MEA committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 28 voting members, 23 voted affirmative, 4 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-HEA go forward to the ROP.

162b 8.3.1.2 FIR, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FIR was further revised in Proposal 101-166a by SAF-DET. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-166a.

165 8.2.3.1.1 FIR [FYI: The Committee Meeting Action was changed back to Accept in Principle after the draft ROP printout was prepared for the TCC agenda. The Final Action of Reject, based on the failed ballot, was retained.]

166a 8.3.1.2 FIR, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21 voting members, 17 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 4 ballots

Page 29 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

174a Table 8.3.4.2

FIR, BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21 voting members, 17 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 4 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-BCF go forward to the ROP.

177a 8.5.4.1 FIR, BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FIR was further revised in Proposal 101-177b by SAF-BCF. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-177b.

177b 8.5.4.1 FIR, BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21 voting members, 12 voted affirmative, 5 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 4 ballots were not returned. Further, the TCC notes that the majority of the negative votes took issue with permitting the undercut – the subject of Proposal 101-177a – and not the issue of applying the provision to existing as well as new installations which is the subject of Proposal 101-177b. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-BCF go forward to the ROP.

177c 8.5.4 FIR, DET DISCUSS OPTIONS Option 1: The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21

Page 30 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

voting members, 13 voted affirmative, 4 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 4 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP. Further, the TCC directs that public comments on this proposal be submitted in the TCC's name to all the occupancy TCs (SAF-AXM, -END, -HEA, -DET, -RES, -BCF, -MER, and –IND). Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Review the TC’s occupancy chapter provisions applicable to smoke barriers and, if it is the TC’s desire, revise text so as to specifically require latching in the appropriate locations. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The occupancy chapters might need to be correlated with the change made to 8.5.4. Option 2: The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21 voting members, 13 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 5 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle and that 8.5.4.3 be revised to read: 8.5.4.3 Latching hardware shall not be required on doors in smoke barriers where permitted unless specifically exempted by Chapters 11 through 43. Further, the TCC directs that public comments on this proposal be submitted in the TCC's name to all the occupancy TCs (SAF-AXM, -END, -HEA, -DET, -RES, -

Page 31 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

BCF, -MER, and –IND). Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Review the TC’s occupancy chapter provisions applicable to smoke barriers and, if it is the TC’s desire, revise text so as to specifically exempt latching in the appropriate locations. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The occupancy chapters might need to be correlated with the change made to 8.5.4.

185 6.1.14.4.5, although filed

as 8.6.7.1

FIR, FUN The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-FUN. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal from SAF-FIR to determine if the space provided by an atrium in compliance with 8.6.7 can serve the function provided by a fire resistance-rated occupancy separation barrier. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The action taken by SAF-FIR on a portion of the Code that is the responsibility of SAF-FUN was not information balloted by SAF-FUN. The SAF-FUN committee is in the best position to determine if the current intent related to a fire-resistance-rated occupancy separation barrier can be met by the space of an atrium.

185a 8.6.7(5) FIR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-FIR. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal in light of member Holmes’ Explanation of Negative. If the action of Accept is to be retained, provide technical justification for the significant technical change.

Page 32 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The egress time for a protect-in-place occupancy like health care is nearing infinity. The change from “whichever is greater” to “whichever is less” would result in 20 minutes of required performance of the smoke control system in an atrium of a hospital, for example.

186 8.6.8 FIR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the SAF-FIR committee balloted a Committee Meeting Action of Reject. As such, the 26 lines of text in the Committee Meeting Action field should have been deleted prior to balloting, and should be ignored by the reviewer of the ROP.

190 8.6.8.6 FIR, DET, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FIR was further revised in Proposal 101-191b by SAF-DET. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle - See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-191b.

190b 8.6.8.6 FIR, DET, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21 voting members, 13 voted affirmative, 4 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 4 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle - See the action on Proposal 101-191b by SAF-DET better addresses the issue. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-191b.

191b 8.6.9.5 FIR, DET, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21

Page 33 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

voting members, 13 voted affirmative, 4 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 4 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP. See the TCC Action on Proposals 101-190 and 101-190b.

193a 8.7.3.3 FIR, HEA The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FIR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 21 voting members, 15 voted affirmative, 2 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 4 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-HEA go forward to the ROP.

197 9.6.1.8.1.3 BSF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-BSF. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal in light of members Hammerburg’s and Reiswig’s Explanation of Negative. If NFPA 72 4.4.5 Exception No. 2 was deleted for the 2010 edition, correlate with NFPA 72 and refer to NFPA 72 as needed Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The Explanation of Negative from members Hammerburg and Reiswig provide new information not available to the committee when it took action at its ROP meeting.

203 9.7.2.1, A.9.7.2.1

BSF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle – Do as the submitter requested but in A.9.7.2.1 change “…monitored shall include..” to “…monitored should include..” in response to member Kapalcynski’s

Page 34 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

Comment on Affirmative as Annex A text is not permitted to be made mandatory.

203a 9.7.3.3 BSF, DET, BCF, MER

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-BSF committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 18 voting members, 8 voted affirmative, 7 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject as the proposed text that this proposal edits is being deleted. See the TCC Note on Proposal 101-203b.

203b 9.7.3.3 BSF, DET, BCF, MER

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-BSF committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 18 voting members, 12 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

204 9.7.3.3 BSF, DET, BCF, MER

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-BSF was challenged in Proposals 101-203b by SAF-DET, 101-204a by SAF-BCF, and 101-204b by SAF-MER. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject. See the TCC Action on Proposals 101-203b, 101-204a and 101-204b.

204a 9.7.3.3 BSF, DET, BCF, MER

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-BSF committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 18 voting members, 12 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-

Page 35 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

BCF go forward to the ROP. 204b 9.7.3.3 BSF, DET,

BCF, MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-BSF committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 18 voting members, 12 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-MER go forward to the ROP.

209a 10.2.3.1 FUN, FUR, DET

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 10 voting members, 9 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-FUN go forward to the ROP. Further, the TCC notes that the text is being further revised by Proposal 101-209c.

209b 10.2.3.1 FUN, FUR, DET

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-FUR go forward to the ROP. Further, the TCC notes that the text is being further revised by Proposal 101-209c.

209c 10.2.3.1 FUN, FUR, DET

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 10 voting members, 7 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

211 10.2.3.7.1 FUR The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) retains the Final Action of Accept in Part but revises the instruction from “Add

Page 36 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

new text to read as follows” to “Replace existing 10.2.3.7.1 (1), (2), and subparts (a) and (b) of (2) with text to read as follows” as it isn’t clear that text is to be deleted before new text is added.

225a 10.3.9 FUR, DET, RES, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 10 voting members, 6 voted affirmative, 1 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

226 10.3.9 FUR, DET, RES, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUR was revised in Proposal 101-225a by SAF-DET. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle - See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-225a.

226a 10.3.9 FUR, DET, RES, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 10 voting members, 5 voted affirmative, 2 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle - The action on Proposal 101-225a by SAF-DET better addresses the issue. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-225a.

226b 10.3.9 FUR, DET, RES, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUR committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 10 voting members, 4 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots

Page 37 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

were not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject in that the action on Proposal 101-225a by SAF-DET better addresses the issue by retaining revised text. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-225a.

229b 11.5 IND The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that although there is no Committee Statement presented in support of the Committee Meeting Action of Reject, the reason behind the action is explained in the Substantiation for this committee-generated proposal.

230 11.8.4.2.4 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-FUN was further revised in Proposal 101-230a by SAF-DET. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-230a.

230a 11.8.4.2.4 FUN, DET The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 20 voted affirmative, 1 voted negative, 1 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

235 12.3.1, 13.3.1

AXM The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-AXM. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal in light of member Schultz’s Comment on Affirmative so as to add text to prevent openings to multiple floors via the “offset” method described. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: Member Schultz’s Comment on Affirmative raises an important point not

Page 38 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

considered by the committee in its action of Accept. The change loses the current code text’s reference to 8.6.8.2 which covers the subject of openings to multiple floors via the “offset” method via its subpart (2).

235a The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the TCC Note on Proposal 101-235 further addresses 12.3.1(3) and 13.3.1(3).

359 30.3.5.4 RES The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-RES. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal in light of member Klein’s Comment on Affirmative so as to correct the annex text to reflect the maximum closet area specified by NFPA 13R and NDFPA 13D. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: Member Klein has noted a discrepancy between what NFPA 13R and NFPA 13D state and what the proposed annex text reports that those documents state.

368 33.3.2.9 BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-BCF. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reformat the provision so as to include a list of options so as to be clear where the exemption of the direct exit applies as raised in member Bonisch’s Comment on Affirmative Make the Substantiation for the comment read: Member Bonisch correctly raises the issue that the formatting of the text does not make clear the committee’s intent.

371 33.3.3.4.6 BCF The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be

Page 39 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-BCF. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the action so as to add the recommended text by using the word “replaced” in lieu of “updated or replaced” for correlation with the action by SAF-END on Proposal 101-250 Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The action by SAF-END on Proposal 101-250 addresses SAF-BCF’s concern with the term “updated.”

380 36.3.3.2, but leads to 37.3.3.2

MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Make the same change to 37.3.3.2. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The change to only 36.3.3.2 makes the requirements for existing interior finish stricter than that for new. The provisions of 37.3.3.2 must be correlated with those of 36.3.3.2.

381a 36.4.4.8, 37.4.4.8, 36.4.5.3, 37.4.5.3, 36.4.5.5 37.4.5.5

FUN, MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action be changed to Accept in Principle – make the recommended changes, but with the following edits: In 36.4.4.8(1) and 37.4.4.8(1), change “Building Code” to “the building code.” In 36.4.5.3(1), 37.4.5.3(1), 36.4.5.5(1) and 37.4.5.5(1), change “Fire Code” to “the fire code.” The changes are being made for correlation with the action on Proposal 101-30d.

381c 36.4.4.3.6, 37.4.4.3.6

MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER.

Page 40 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Make changes to address the issues raised in member Thornberry’s and Gumkowski’s Comment on Affirmative. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The text as revised is confusing and incorrect. It can be fixed by addressing the issues raised by members Thornberry and Gumkowski.

385d 38.2.4.6 MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal so as not to make the change. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The current text was written specifically to address two-story townhouse-type office buildings where each tenant has a two-story space that abuts its neighbor’s two-story space. The change made by the proposal will no longer permit a single means of egress [with an unenclosed stair as permitted by 38.3.1.1(2)] within such tenant space. The change was made without technical substantiation as to why the arrangement does not provide adequate life safety.

386 38.3.4.2.1 MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal so as to either: not to make the change, or (2) write annex text to substantiate deviation from NFPA 72 and get the NFPA 72 committee’s input on the proposed deviation.

Page 41 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

Make the Substantiation for the comment read: NFPA 72-2010 was revised to delete former 4.4.5 Exception No. 2. See Member Gauvin’s Explanation of Negative on Proposal 101-386 which details the conflict between the proposed change and NFPA 72. The Standards Council policy on steps that an occupancy document committee needs to take if it wants to deviate from an installation document must be followed.

388 38.4.2.1 MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-ME. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal so as to either: not to make the change, or (2) write annex text to substantiate deviation from NFPA 72 and get the NFPA 72 committee’s input on the proposed deviation. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: NFPA 72-2010 was revised to delete former 4.4.5 Exception No. 2. See Member Gauvin’s Explanation of Negative on Proposal 101-388 which details the conflict between the proposed change and NFPA 72. The Standards Council policy on steps that an occupancy document committee needs to take if it wants to deviate from an installation document must be followed.

390 39.2.4.7 MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the proposal in light of member Thornberry’s Explanation of Negative in which he contends that the committee acted in its ROP meeting so that the text of 39.2.4.7(1) would require BOTH

Page 42 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

automatic sprinklers and smoke detection, yet the text balloted connected the two items with the word “or.” Make the Substantiation for the comment read: Member Thornberry’s point relative to “sprinklers and detectors” raises the issue of whether members voted for what they thought the action was rather than what was balloted. Was consensus reached on the subject?

391 39.3.4.4 MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that a public comment be submitted in the TCC’s name to SAF-MER. Make the Recommendation for the comment read: Reconsider the action so as to add the recommended text by using the word “replaced” in lieu of “updated or replaced” for correlation with the action by SAF-END on Proposal 101-250. Make the Substantiation for the comment read: The action by SAF-END on Proposal 101-250 addresses SAF-MER’s concern with the term “updated.”

399b 43.7.1 FUN, HEA The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 21 voted affirmative, 1 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-HEA go forward to the ROP.

409a Table A.7.6

MEA, HEA The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-MEA committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 28 voting members, 27 voted affirmative, 0

Page 43 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-HEA go forward to the ROP.

409b Table A.7.6

MEA, HEA The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-MEA committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 28 voting members, 27 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-HEA go forward to the ROP.

411a A.9.1.3 BSF, DET, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-BSF was challenged in Proposals 101-411b by SAF-BCF and 101-411d by SAF-DET. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject. See the TCC Action on Proposals 101-411b and 101-411d.

411b A.9.1.3 BSF, DET, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-BSF committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 18 voting members, 12 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-BCF go forward to the ROP.

411c A.9.1.3 BSF, DET, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-BSF committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 18 voting members, 10 voted affirmative, 5 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Reject as the proposed text that this

Page 44 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

proposal edits is being deleted. See the TCC Note on Proposals 101-411b and 101-411d.

411d A.9.1.3 BSF, DET, BCF

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-BSF committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 18 voting members, 12 voted affirmative, 3 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 3 ballots were not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-DET go forward to the ROP.

417b A.43.6.2.2 FUN, MER The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that this proposal was informational balloted by the SAF-FUN committee which has primary responsibility for the affected section of the Code. Of 23 voting members, 22 voted affirmative, 0 voted negative, 0 abstained, and 1 ballot was not returned. The TCC directs that the action of Accept on this proposal by SAF-MER go forward to the ROP.

418 [See 161a]

Annex B [renumbered

to Section 7.14]

MEA, HEA The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the action on this proposal by SAF-MEA was further revised in Proposal 101-161a by SAF-HEA. See the TCC Action on Proposal 101-161a.

430 D.1.2.6 FUN, FIR, FUR, MEA

The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in Principle – See action on Proposals 101-431 and 101-433 which make additional updates.


The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the Committee Meeting Action stands but that the action on Proposal 101-433 further revises the title of ASTM E 2484.


The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) directs that the Final Action on this proposal be changed to Accept in

Page 45 of 310

of 25




SAF-___


Note

Principle – See action on Proposals 101-431 and 101-433 which make additional updates.


The Technical Correlating Committee (TCC) notes that the Committee Meeting Action stands but that the action on Proposal 101-431 further updates the edition date on three of the publications.

Page 46 of 310

101-1

Report on Proposals A2011 — Copyright, NFPA NFPA 101 _______________________________________________________ 101-1 Log #212a SAF-AXM Final Action: Accept in Principle in Part (Various Occupancy Chapters xx.1.1.2 and xx.1.1.3 [12.1, 13.1, 14.1, 15.1, 16.1, 18.1, 19.1, 20.1, 22.1, 23.1, 24.1, 26.1, 28.1, 29.1, 30.1, 31.1, 32.1, 33.1, 36.1, 37.1, 40.1, and 42.1]) _______________________________________________________ Submitter: James K. Lathrop, Koffel Assoc., Inc. Recommendation: New text to read as follows: Add two new paragraphs as the second and third paragraph of each occupancy chapter. XX.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply. XX.1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply. 12.1 General Requirements 12.1.1 Application 12.1.1.1 The requirements of this chapter shall apply to new buildings or portions thereof used as an assembly occupancy (see 1.3.1) 12.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 12.1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply. Add a new 13.1.1.2 and 13.1.1.3 13.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 13 1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply Add a new 14/15.1.1.2 and 14.15.1.1.3 14/15.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 14/15.1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply Add a new 16/17.1.1.2 and 16/17.1.1.3 16/17.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 16/17.1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply Add a new 18/19.1.1.1.2 and 18/19.1.1.1.3 NOTE: The extra digit “1” in this occupancy 18/19.1.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 18/19.1.1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply Add a new 20/21.1.1.1.2 and 20/21.1.1.1.3 NOTE: The extra digit “1” in this occupancy 20/21.1.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 20/21.1.1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply Add a new 22/23.1.1.1.2 and 22/23.1.1.1.3 NOTE: The extra digit “1” in this occupancy 22/23.1.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 22/23.1.1.1.3 General. The provisions of Chapter 4 General shall apply Add a new 24.1.1.2 and 24.1.1.3 24.1.1.2 Administration. The provisions of Chapter 1 Administration shall apply 24.1.

Documents

AGENDA NFPA Technical Correlating Committee on Safety to ... · Equipment in Dwelling Units, has been placed under the purview of the Signaling Systems Technical Correlating Committee