33
1

AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

1

Page 2: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

AGENDA

Introduction

Complying with the Disaster Management Act of 57 of 2002.

Strategy and the BC Culture

Resiliency then Elasticity for Services

The need for a National BC Forum

Conclusion

2

Page 3: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Introduction

Executives and committees of and Government, Departments, Entities and SOE’s, should

understand and implement business continuity and resiliency concepts in relation to their service delivery process and the NDP

3

Page 4: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

4

Page 5: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

The Disaster Management Act No. 57 of 2002.

• Obligatory to understand and support the national disaster management centre if a national department or entity, or provincial government.

• Mitigating strategies for disasters should be recorded in three areas:

– National

– Provincial

– Municipal

5

Page 6: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

6

Page 7: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Q7: What systems are relevant to your organisation?

• Answered: 8 Skipped: 1

Page 8: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Q8: Your strategy and annual performance plans

• Answered: 7 Skipped: 2

Page 9: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Q9: Evaluate the following statements with regards to Human Capital

• Answered: 8 Skipped: 1

Page 10: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Q10: Consider these disasterous events, and choose the best fit

• Answered: 8 Skipped: 1

Page 11: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Q11: Evaluate the following statements.

• Answered: 8 Skipped: 1

Page 12: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Q12: Evaluate the following statements about BC Management.

• Answered: 8 Skipped: 1

Page 13: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Q15: Evaluate the following statements concerning BC

Maintenance • Answered: 8 Skipped: 1

Page 14: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

14

Page 15: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

H Continuity Culture

Sustainability

Strategy Impact

Tactics Organisational

Outcomes

OperationsOperational Outcomes

Process Outputs

Strategic Pyramid

Board / Shareholders

EXCO

MANCO

Supervisory management

Annual Report and Financial

Statements

Investment

Service Delivery

Service Levels

15

Page 16: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Three Strategic Alignment Concerns

• Goals

• Objectives

• Risk Register

– Risks identified in the environmental scan

– Mitigating strategies

16

Page 17: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

BC Culture Indicators

• BC moving from a risk register to Strategy

• BC on the executive meeting Agenda

• Executives participating actively in BC exercises

• Top down BC approach

• Employees managing incidents

17

Page 18: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

18

Page 19: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Why redundancy fails

• The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby) was to enable ongoing operations.

• This worked well in factories but failed in the technological space where millisecond switchover counts.

• Data transportation can no longer rely on one machine in standby mode, data transportation networks require a meshed network where there is always a plan A, B, C, D and more for continuous operation.

19

Page 20: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Continuity and Resilience (Adapted from Lance, Gunderson, & Holling,

2002)

g) Evaluation c) Implementation /

Projects

h)

En

erg

y

d)

Pro

acti

ve

a)

Ris

ks

Iden

tifi

ed

f) R

eacti

ve

a) Mitigating Strategy /

Planning e) Incident or Disaster

20

Page 21: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

The Four BC planes

People Facilities

Process Technology

21

Page 22: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

BC Exercises

• Executive involvement

• Should be done in various ways

• Live or desktop scenarios.

• Live scenarios would include staff, committees or even stakeholders.

• Desktop exercises as a strategic and risk game.

22

Page 23: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

23

Page 24: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

BC Matters to be addressed

• Continuity Programmes only for the Primary Functions; • Resiliency for services to the Public ignored; • Supply Chain BC Plans rarely reviewed or required ; • Basic services to the public not the first priority; • Business Impact Analysis becoming a once-off activity; • Impactful Risk mitigation, leading to resiliency and

maturity, not being visible in Corporate strategies; • Service providers exorbitant costs (BC and DR Sites); • Business and process design not for resiliency; • Skills deficiencies to implement continuity solutions; • The institutional ignorance of Cybercrime; and, • Employee awareness of BC Management.

24

Page 25: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

A BC Forum for Integrated DR Solutions

• A new dimension for Public Sector BC practitioners.

• BC information sharing forum for the public sector, national, provincial and municipal

• Leads to innovative cost saving solutions

• Solve disaster recovery problems within the public sector

• Will result in less external consultation

• Assured service delivery to the citizens of our country.

25

Page 26: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

.

National Government Departments

Provincial Governments Local

Government

State Owned Entities Constitutional Imperatives

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

Page 27: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

A National BC Forum Committee

27

Chair / Vice Chairperson &

Secretary

Risk Forum Representative

SOE representative

COGTA representative

SITA Representative

AG representative Treasury

Representative

2 National Department

Representatives

2 Provincial representatives

2 Municipal representatives

Page 28: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

.

National Government

Provincial Government

Local Government

State Owned Entities

Private Sector (?)

Government Continuity

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

BCM

BIA

RTO

RA

Page 29: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Future Government DR Spaces

• An integrated DR system.

• In-sourcing models for BC and DR.

• A dedicated Data Cloud for Government.

• Dedicated disaster recovery centres.

• Each large state building housing at least 50 DR seats.

• The resilience of the state.

29

Page 30: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

30

Page 31: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

31

Page 32: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

Conclusion

Although the Public sector has not reached relevant maturity levels in Business Continuity, it does have the potential to lead BC in South

Africa, setting up resilient structures, to withstand both man-made and natural

disasters.

32

Page 33: AGENDA Documents...exercises •Top down BC approach •Employees managing incidents 17 18 Why redundancy fails •The earlier industrial methods of introducing redundant systems (standby)

THANK YOU

33

Email: [email protected]