African Agricultural Planning Scorecard: Feedback

Ghana, Senegal, Mali, Kenya, Botswana, Niger, South Africa,

Senegal and Burkina Faso

Existence of an up to date national agricultural strategy

Botswana Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Realistic medium term resource allocations in strategy

Botswana Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Separate budgets for departments

Botswana Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Explicit arrangements for managing weather risk in budget

Botswana Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Recurrent and capital budget jointly managed

Botswana Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Expenditure constrained by budget not cash negotiation

Botswana Burkina Faso

Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Budget constraint (exp)Average score

Use of performance indicators by department

Botswana Burkina Faso

Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Performance indicatorsAverage score

Estimation of benefits of major initiatives

Botswana Burkina Faso

Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Estimation of benefitsAverage score

Feedback from farmers and stakeholders to government

Botswana Burkina Faso Ghana Kenya Mali Mauritius Niger Rwanda Senegal South Africa0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5