14
ΤΟΜΟΣ 11 - ΤΕΥΧΟΣ 2 [29] ΕΡΕΥΝΗΤΙΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ Αναφορά του άρθρου ως: Κατσουνάκη Ν., Κιαουρτζή Ε., Μανουσάκη Ε. (2018). Διερεύνηση του φαινομένου mobbing στο ιατρονοσηλευτικό προσωπικό του Πανεπιστημιακού Γενικού Νοσοκομείου Ηρακλείου. Ελληνικό Περιοδικό Νοσηλευτικής Επιστήμης 11(2): 29-42. ΠΕΡΙΛΗΨΗ Εισαγωγή: Αποτελέσματα διεθνών μελετών έχουν δείξει ότι ο εργασιακός εκφοβισμός (mobbing) αποτελεί συχνό φαινόμενο στο χώρο της υγείας. Στην Ελλάδα, ωστόσο, το θέμα δεν έχει διερευνηθεί επαρκώς. Σκοπός: Η διερεύνηση του φαινομένου mobbing στο ιατρονοσηλευτικό προσωπικό του Πανεπιστημιακού Γενικού Νοσοκομείου Ηρακλείου (ΠΑΓΝΗ). Μεθοδολογία: Πραγματοποιήθηκε συγχρονική ποσοτική μελέτη σε δείγμα 80 νοσηλευτών, βοηθών νοσηλευτών και ιατρών (ποσοστό απόκρισης 53,3%) κατά τον Ιούλιο-Οκτώβριο 2016. Για τη συλλογή των δεδομένων χρησιμοποιήθηκε το ερωτηματολόγιο Negative Acts Questionnaire - Revised και για τη στατιστική ανάλυση το στατιστικό πακέτο ΙΒΜ SPSS Statistics V.23. Αποτελέσματα: Το δείγμα της μελέτης ήταν 65% γυναίκες, το 57,5% ήταν νοσηλευτές και βοηθοί νοσηλευτών και το 42,5% ιατροί. Το βασικό επίπεδο σπουδών των συμμετεχόντων στη μελέτη ήταν ΠΕ σε ποσοστό 48,8%, ΤΕ 38,8% και ΔΕ 12,5%. Το 87% των νοσηλευτών και βοηθών νοσηλευτών δεν κατείχε θέση προϊσταμένου και το 50% των ιατρών ήταν ειδικευόμενοι. Με την έμμεση μέθοδο αυτοαναφοράς, βρέθηκε ότι το 41,3% των ερωτηθέντων υπήρξαν θύματα σοβαρού mobbing και το 31,3% περιστασιακού mobbing. Με την άμεση μέθοδο του αυτοχαρακτηρισμού, βρέθηκε ότι το 6,3% αναγνωρίζουν τον εαυτό τους ως θύματα σοβαρού mobbing και το 37,6% ως περιστασιακού. Συχνότερα αναγνωρίζεται το mobbing που σχετίζεται με την εργασία. Ως προς το φύλο, δράστες αναγνωρίζονται περισσότερο οι άνδρες, ενώ ως θύματα χαρακτηρίζονται περισσότερο οι ιατροί σε σχέση με τους νοσηλευτές ως προς την κλίμακα του mobbing που σχετίζεται με την εργασία (p<0,05), οι προϊστάμενοι νοσηλευτές σε σχέση με τους μη κατέχοντες θέση προϊσταμένου ως προς το προσωπικό mobbing (p<0,05) και οι πτυχιούχοι ΠΕ σε σχέση με τους πτυχιούχους ΤΕ και ΔΕ ως προς το mobbing που σχετίζεται με την εργασία (p<0,05). Συμπεράσματα: Η παρούσα μελέτη ανέδειξε τη συχνή εμφάνιση mobbing σε μέλη του ιατρονοσηλευτικού προσωπι- κού για τη συγκεκριμένη ομάδα πληθυσμού. Προτείνεται περαιτέρω έρευνα, σε μεγαλύτερο δείγμα, που να περιλαμ- βάνει και άλλες ειδικότητες επαγγελματιών από το χώρο της υγείας. Λέξεις-κλειδιά: Mobbing, εργασιακός εκφοβισμός, ιατρονοσηλευτικό προσωπικό Διερεύνηση του φαινομένου mobbing στο ιατρονοσηλευτικό προσωπικό του Πανεπιστημιακού Γενικού Νοσοκομείου Ηρακλείου Νίκη Κατσουνάκη 1 , Ελπίδα Κιαουρτζή 1 , Ευτυχία Μανουσάκη 2 1. Νοσηλεύτρια 2. Νοσηλεύτρια, ΜΕΘ, ΠΑ.Γ.Ν. Ηρακλείου Υπεύθυνος Αλληλογραφίας: Ελπίδα Κιαουρτζή, Ηλεκτρονική Διεύθυνση: [email protected], Τηλέφωνο: 6942868367 Ημερομηνία Υποβολής: 20/05/2017

∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    18

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

!"#"$ 11 - !%&'"$ 2 [29]

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"#$%&' (%) '&*&%) +,: -#(.%)"'/0 1., -2#%)&(34 5., 6#"%).'/0 5. (2018). 728&89"0.0 (%) $#2"%µ:"%) mobbing .(% 2#(&%"%.0;8)(2/< =&%.+=2/< (%) >#"8=2.(0µ2#/%9 ?8"2/%9 1%.%/%µ8@%) A&#/;8@%). !""#$%&' ()*%+,%&' -+.#")/0%&12 !3%.01µ#2 11(2): 29-42.

!"#$%&'&"()*+,+-: !"#$%&'(µ)$) *+%,-.- µ%&%$.- '/#0- *%12%+ 3$+ # %45)(+)637 %68#9+(µ37 (mobbing) )"#$%&%1 (0/-3 8)+-3µ%-# ($# /.4# $:7 05%1)7. ;$:- <&&=*), >($3(#, $# ,'µ) *%- '/%+ *+%4%0-:,%1 %")46.7. ./0123: ? *+%4%@-:(: $#0 8)+-#µ'-#0 mobbing ($# +)$4#-#(:&%0$+63 "4#(>"+63 $#0 A)-%"+($:µ+)6#@ B%-+6#@ C#(#6#µ%1#0 ?4)6&%1#0 (A!BC?).45607080+9*: A4)5µ)$#"#+D,:6% (05/4#-+6D "#(#$+6D µ%&'$: (% *%15µ) 80 -#(:&%0$.-, 9#:,.- -#(:&%0$.- 6)+ +)$4.- ("#(#($3 )"364+(:7 53,3%) 6)$= $#- E#@&+#-F6$.94+# 2016. B+) $: (0&&#5D $>- *%*#µ'->- /4:(+µ#"#+D,:6% $# %4>$:µ)$#&35+# Negative Acts Questionnaire - Revised 6)+ 5+) $: ($)$+($+6D )-=&0(: $# ($)$+($+63 ")6'$# EGH SPSS Statistics V.23.:10;58<)µ*;*: I# *%15µ) $:7 µ%&'$:7 D$)- 65% 50-)16%7, $# 57,5% D$)- -#(:&%0$'7 6)+ 9#:,#1 -#(:&%0$.- 6)+ $# 42,5% +)$4#1. I# 9)(+63 %"1"%*# ("#0*.- $>- (0µµ%$%/3-$>- ($: µ%&'$: D$)- A< (% "#(#($3 48,8%, I< 38,8% 6)+ J< 12,5%. I# 87% $>- -#(:&%0$.- 6)+ 9#:,.- -#(:&%0$.- *%- 6)$%1/% ,'(: "4#K($)µ'-#0 6)+ $# 50% $>- +)$4.- D$)- %+*+6%03µ%-#+. H% $:- 'µµ%(: µ',#*# )0$#)-)8#4=7, 94',:6% 3$+ $# 41,3% $>- %4>$:,'-$>- 0"D42)- ,@µ)$) (#9)4#@ mobbing 6)+ $# 31,3% "%4+($)(+)6#@ mobbing. H% $:- =µ%(: µ',#*# $#0 )0$#/)4)6$:4+(µ#@, 94',:6% 3$+ $# 6,3% )-)5->41L#0- $#- %)0$3 $#07 >7 ,@µ)$) (#9)4#@ mobbing 6)+ $# 37,6% >7 "%4+($)(+)6#@. ;0/-3$%4) )-)5->41L%$)+ $# mobbing "#0 (/%$1L%$)+ µ% $:- %45)(1). M7 "4#7 $# 8@&#, *4=($%7 )-)5->41L#-$)+ "%4+((3$%4# #+ =-*4%7, %-. >7 ,@µ)$) /)4)6$:41L#-$)+ "%4+((3$%4# #+ +)$4#1 (% (/'(: µ% $#07 -#(:&%0$'7 >7 "4#7 $:- 6&1µ)6) $#0 mobbing "#0 (/%$1L%$)+ µ% $:- %45)(1) (p<0,05), #+ "4#K($=µ%-#+ -#(:&%0$'7 (% (/'(: µ% $#07 µ: 6)$'/#-$%7 ,'(: "4#K($)µ'-#0 >7 "4#7 $# "4#(>"+63 mobbing (p<0,05) 6)+ #+ "$0/+#@/#+ A< (% (/'(: µ% $#07 "$0/+#@/#07 I< 6)+ J< >7 "4#7 $# mobbing "#0 (/%$1L%$)+ µ% $:- %45)(1) (p<0,05)..=µ15>?)µ*;*: ? ")4#@() µ%&'$: )-'*%+2% $: (0/-D %µ8=-+(: mobbing (% µ'&: $#0 +)$4#-#(:&%0$+6#@ "4#(>"+-6#@ 5+) $: (056%64+µ'-: #µ=*) "&:,0(µ#@. A4#$%1-%$)+ "%4)+$'4> '4%0-), (% µ%5)&@$%4# *%15µ), "#0 -) "%4+&)µ-9=-%+ 6)+ =&&%7 %+*+63$:$%7 %")55%&µ)$+.- )"3 $# /.4# $:7 05%1)7. %<@5(3-/85(7(?: Mobbing, %45)(+)637 %68#9+(µ37, +)$4#-#(:&%0$+63 "4#(>"+63

!"#$#%&'(' )*+ ,-"&*µ.&*+ mobbing ()* "-)$*&*('/#+)"01 2$*(32"01 )*+ 4-&#2"()'µ"-0*%

5#&"0*% 6*(*0*µ#7*+ 8$-0/#7*+

1@/0 -#(.%)"'/01, 5;=@B# -2#%)&(341, 5)()C@# 6#"%).'/02

1. 1%.0;89(&2#2. 1%.0;89(&2#, 65D, >!.?.1. A&#/;8@%)

E=89*)"%, !;;0;%F&#$@#,: 5;=@B# -2#%)&(34, A;8/(&%"2/4 7289*)".0: [email protected], G0;:$+"%: 6942868367

Aµ8&%µ0"@# E=%H%;4,: 20/05/2017

Page 2: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

[30] !""#$%&' (!)%'*%&' +#, $',#"!-+%&#, !(%,+#.#,

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"#$%A #&'()"

!"#$%&'() !"µ*'(+,-(./ mobbing *-" !#'&01-$&)+ µ' &2$ '(3)!0) )*% &- $-!24'"&+5% *(-!6*+5%.

*(-!6*+5-7, µ' &-"/ $-!24'"&./ *-" 5)&.#-"$ 8.!2 *(-9!&)µ.$-" $) :+;$-"$ !"#$%&'() !"µ*'(+,-(./ *(-!6*+5-7 mobbing.

($#"*+*&

T! "#$%#&'% &() ’90, ( Heinz Leymann (1996) *+#,# &-. /0,#-. 1-% &! µ#2*&! &() 3%-4(µ*4() &() #51%-,-%$(6 #$3(/-,µ(6 (mobbing). 76µ384% µ# &(4

Leymann (1996), ! 9):(2(1-$; &5(µ($5%&'% ; mobbing ,&!4 #51%,-%$; <8; ,)µ=#5-2%µ/04#- #:+5-$; $%- %4;-+-$! #=-$(-484'%, =() $%&#)+64#&%- µ# ,),&!µ%&-$> &5>=( %=> *4% ; =#5-,,>&#5% 0&(µ%, $)5'8. =5(. *4% 0&(µ( &( (=('(, 2>18 &() mobbing, 8+#'&%- ,# µ#-(4#-$&-$; +*,! $%- $5%&#'&%- #$#' µ*,8 ,)4#:-<>µ#484 "5%-,&!5-(&;&84 mobbing. ?)&*. (- "50,#-. ,)µ/%'4()4 ,# =(26 ,):4; /0,!, &()20:-,&(4 µ-% 3(50 &! /"(µ0"%, $%- 1-% µ%$50 :5(4-$; =#5'("(, &()20:-,&(4 1-% *@- µ;4#.. 7;µ#5%, )=05:()4 =(22(' (5-,µ(' 1-% &( mobbing, =() :5!,-µ(=(-(64&%- µ022(4 04%5:%. A,&>,(, ,# *4% /%,--$> #='=#"( =5>$#-&%- 1-% ,),&!µ%&-$; $%$(µ#&%:#'5-,! #4>. )3-,&0µ#4(), #4>. ,)4%"*23(), ; #4>. %4B&#5() =(), %4 ,)4#:-,&#' $%- "-%5$*,#- =(26, µ=(5#' 4% =5(-$%2*,#- ,(/%50 $(-484-$0, 9):(2(1-$0 $%- 9):(,8-µ%&-$0 =5(/2;µ%&% ,&( +6µ%. C( 3%-4>µ#4( %4%3*5#-&%- 8. workplace bullying ,&-. %112>384#. :B5#., 8. harassment ,&-. 1%22>384#. $%- 8. mobbing ,&-. =#-5-,,>&#5#. 022#. #)58=%D$*. :B5#., $)5'8. &-. ,$%4-"-4%/-$*. (Einarsen et al 2011).

E *5#)4% 1-% &( mobbing ,&!4 F)5B=!, >=8. =#5--1503#&%- %=> &(). Zapf et al (2003), %3(50 $)5'8. ,&! ,):4>&!&% $%- "-05$#-% &() mobbing, &(4 %5-+µ>, 362( $%- ,&0&(). &84 "5%,&B4 $%- +)µ0&84, &!4 #µ304-,! &() mobbing ,&(). #51%,-%$(6. $20"(). $%- &-. $%&!1(5'#. &() mobbing.

G ,)4!+*,&#5(. &5>=(. µ*&5!,!. &!. ,):4>&!&%. &() mobbing #'4%- µ*,8 &84 %=%4&;,#84 ,# #58&!µ%&(2>-1-( %4':4#),!. %54!&-$B4 ,)µ=#5-3(5B4. H)5'%5:! µ*-+("(. #'4%- ! %)&(%4%3(5-$;, =() :5!,-µ(=(-#' $5-&;5-% >=8. &( 2#-&()51-$> &() Leymann (1990b %4%3(50 ,&( Nielsen et al 2011) &( (=('( :%5%$&!5'<#- $0=(-(4 8. ,&>-:( mobbing %5$#' 4% *:#- #$&#+#' ,# &()20:-,&(4 µ'% %5-4!&-$; ,)µ=#5-3(50 µ# ,):4>&!&% &()20:-,&(4 µ'% 3(50 &!4 #/"(µ0"% 1-% µ'% "-05$#-% &()20:-,&(4 6 µ!4B4 ; &(

#4%22%$&-$> $5-&;5-( &84 Notelaers $%- Einarsen (2009 %4%3(50 ,&( Nielsen et al 2011), ,6µ384% µ# &( (=('( ! /%+µ(2(1'% &84 #58&Bµ#484 ,&( #58&!µ%&(2>1-( %4'-:4#),!. %54!&-$B4 ,)µ=#5-3(5B4 &(). $%&%&0,,#- ,# +6µ%&% ,(/%5(6 mobbing ; >:-. F=-=2*(4 &!. =%5%=048 µ#+>"(), =5(&#'4#&%- $%- ! ,)µ=2!58µ%&-$; =5(,*11-,! &() %)&(:%5%$&!5-,µ(6 &84 #58&Bµ#484 8. +)µ0&84 mobbing, µ*,8 #5B&!,!. =() µ#&50#- &!4 %)&(%4%3#-5>µ#4! +)µ%&(=('!,! %=> mobbing $%&0 &! "-05$#-% &84 6 &#2#)&%'84 µ!4B4, %3(6 *:#- =%5(),-%,&#' ,&(). ,)µµ#&*:(4&#. *4%. =%1$>,µ-% %=("#$&>. (5-,µ>. &() #$3(/-,µ(6 ,&!4 #51%,'% (Einarsen & Skogstad 1996, Salin 2001%4%3(50 ,&( Einarsen et al 2009).

G µ*,(. >5(. &!. ,):4>&!&%. &() mobbing, ,6µ384% µ# #)58=%D$*. *5#)4#., #µ3%4'<#&%- ,&( 3-7% µ# &!4 %)-&(%4%3(5-$; =5(,*11-,! $%- ,&( 1-4% µ# &! =5(,*11-,! &() %)&(:%5%$&!5-,µ(6 (Zapf et al 2003). A,&>,(, *5#)-4#. =() *:()4 #,&-0,#- #-"-$>&#5% ,# -%&5(4(,!2#)&-$> =5(,8=-$> #4&(='<()4 µ#1%26&#5% =(,(,&0, >=8. ! *5#)4% &84 McMahon et al (2013), ,# 4(,!2#)&*. ,&!4 I52%4"'%, &84 Karatza et al (2016) $%- &84 J=%$*22% $%- ,)4 (2013) ,# µ*2! 4(,!2#)&-$(6 =5(,8=-$(6 ,&!4 F2-20"%.

?5$#&*. *5#)4#. "#':4()4 >&- ,)4;+8. (- 1)4%'$#. #'4%- =-( ,):40 µ#&%@6 &84 +)µ0&84, 8,&>,(, =(22*. 3(5*. &( 1#1(4>. %)&> (3#'2#&%- ,&!4 )=#5#$=5(,B=!-,! &84 1)4%-$B4 ,&(4 %4&',&(-:( =2!+),µ>, -"'8. ,&-. *5#)4#. =() µ#2*&!,%4 &( mobbing ,# &(µ#'. =() $)-5-%5:(64&%4 %=> 1)4%'$#., >=8. ( &(µ*%. &84 $(-484--$B4 )=!5#,-B4 $%- ( &(µ*%. )1#'%. (Zapf et al 2003). A. =5(. &( 362( &84 "5%,&B4, (- *5#)4#. 1#4-$0 "#':4()4 µ-% )=#5#$=5(,B=!,! &84 %4"5B4 µ#&%@6 &84 "5%-,&B4 (Zapf et al 2003).

A. =5(. &(4 %5-+µ> &84 #µ=2#$(µ*484, (- *5#)4#. "#':4()4 >&- ( "50,&!. #'4%- *4%. ,# =(,(,&> 20-40% &84 =#5-=&B,#84. A,&>,(, %4%3*5(4&%- =(22(' "50,&#. ,# =(,(,&> 15-50% $%- %)&> #@!1#'&%- %=> &( >&- ,# =#-5-=&B,#-. ,(/%5(6 mobbing (- "50,&#. %)@04(4&%- >,( %)@04#&%- ! "-05$#-% &() mobbing, $%+B. 1'4#&%- >2(

Page 3: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

!"#"$ 11 - !%&'"$ 2 [31]

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"# $%&!'()*+,' &*'- .+,/0%,' -" .","µ+/-+# '%$1*+-,'2 (Zapf et al 2003). 3+ "-4('0' *,).' µ'#,45'-*"# *" ".'*+(1&µ"*" !"# &+ "-*/&*'#6+2 1,+%-+2 &*'- *'µ1" *72 %0+/"2 (McMahon et al 2013, 8+/," 2014).

9 :1&7 *'% $,4&*7 &*7- #+,",6/" $#";1,+# "-4('-0" µ+ *7 6<," &*7- '.'/' $#+=>6:7 7 1,+%-", $#";',4 .'% +=70+/*"# ".) *'%2 Zapf et al (2003) )*# ';+/(+*"# &*#2 .'(#*#&µ#!12 $#";',12 .'% +µ;"-/5'%- '# 6<,+2 µ+*"=? *'%2. @&*)&', -1+2 1,+%-+2 .'% +&*#45'%- &+ #"*,'-'&7-(+%*#!) .,'&A.#!) !"*"0,4;'%- µ+0"(?*+," &+ .'&'-&*4 *'%2 $,4&*+2 A2 .,'B&*"µ1-'%2 (Cevik et al 2012, Mc Mahon et al 2013, 8+/," 2014).

@2 .,'2 *'- +."00+(µ"*#!) *'µ1", '# *'µ+/2 %0+/"2, $7µ)&#"2 $#'/!7&72 !"# +!."/$+%&72 +µ;"-/5'%- %C7-()*+,' !/-$%-' +µ;4-#&72 mobbing (Zapf et al 2003). D.'&*7,/5+*"# )*# '# +,0"5)µ+-'# &*'- *'µ1" %0+/"2 16'%- .+,/.'% 16 ;',12 µ+0"(?*+,' !/-$%-' -" E#<&'%- E/" ".) )*# '# 4(('# +,0"5)µ+-'# &*'%2 *'µ+/2 %.7,+&#<-, "((4 +/-"# '# -'&7(+%*12 .'% !#-$%-+?'%- .+,#&&)*+,' (Leather 2002). F%*> 7 &%-+#$7*'.'/7&7 &%-'$+?*7!+ ".) µ#" &*,';> *72 1,+%-"2 ".) *7- +=1*"&7 *'% E":µ'? 1!:+&72 .'% E/A-"- '# C%6/"*,'#, !'#-A-#!'/ (+#*'%,-0'/, C%6'()0'#, &?µE'%('# !"# 4(('# :+,".+%*12, ",6#!4, .,'2 *'%2 -'&7(+%*12.

G.A2 ;4-7!+ .",".4-A, &?µ;A-" µ+ *7 $#+:-> 1,+%-", *' mobbing ".'*+(+/ &%6-) ;"#-)µ+-' &*#2 %.7-,+&/+2 %0+/"2. H*7- I((4$", A&*)&', 7 1,+%-" !"# '# *,)-.'# "-*#µ+*<.#&>2 *'% $+- +/-"# "!)µ" +.",!+/2.

J &!'.)2 *72 .",'?&"2 µ+(1*72 +/-"# -" $#+,+%->&+# *7- +µ;4-#&7 *'% ;"#-'µ1-'% *'% mobbing &*" µ1(7 *'% #"*,'-'&7(+%*#!'? .,'&A.#!'? &*'- 6<,' *'% K"-+.#-&*7µ#"!'? L+-#!'? M'&'!'µ+/'% *'% 9,"!(+/'% N,>*72 (KFLM9). L#" *7- +./*+%=7 *'% +,+%-7*#!'? &!'.'? */:+--*"# *,+#2 +,+%-7*#!'/ &*)6'#. J .,<*'2 +/-"# -" !"*"0,"-;+/ ' E":µ)2 !"# 7 &%6-)*7*" +µ;4-#&72 *'% ;"#-'µ1-'% *'% mobbing &*" µ1(7 *'% #"*,'-'&7(+%*#!'? .,'&A.#-!'?, !":<2 !"# -" 0/-+# µ/" .,'&.4:+#" *%.'('0/"2 *A- +!;'E#&*#!<- &%µ.+,#;',<- 0#" *7- "-"0-<,#&7 *A- µ',;<- *72 +.#:+*#!>2 &%µ.+,#;',42. O+?*+,'2 &*)6'2 +/-"# -" 0/-+# µ/" .,'&.4:+#" &!#"0,4;7&72 *'% .,';/( *A- $,"&*<-, +-< *,/*'2 &*)6'2 +/-"# -" $#+,+%-7:+/ 7 &%&61*#&7 *72 +µ;4-#&72 *'% ;"#-'µ1-'% µ+ $7µ'0,";#-!'?2 (;?(', 7(#!/"), +."00+(µ"*#!'?2 (+#$/!+%&7, 6,)-#" +."00+(µ"*#!>2 +µ.+#,/"2, :1&7 &*7- #+,",6/") !"# µ',-;A*#!'?2 .",40'-*+2 (+./.+$' E"&#!<- &.'%$<-), ."-,40'-*+2 '# '.'/'# .,'*+/-'-*"# !"# ".) *7 E#E(#'0,";/".

!"#$%$&$'()!"#$%&'µ()

N":<2 !?,#'2 +,+%-7*#!)2 &*)6'2 *72 µ+(1*72 >*"- 7 $#+,+?-7&7 *72 &%&61*#&72 $7µ'0,";#!<-, +."00+(-µ"*#!<- !"# µ',;A*#!<- 6","!*7,#&*#!<- *A- &%µµ+-*+6)-*A- µ+ *7- 4&!7&7 mobbing &+ "%*'?2, +.#(16:7!+

' &%&6+*#&*#!)2 +,+%-7*#!)2 &6+$#"&µ)2, ' '.'/'2 6,7-&#µ'.'#+/*"# 0#" -" .+,#0,";+/ !"# -" µ+*,7:+/ ' E":µ)2 &%&61*#&72 "-4µ+&" &+ $?' > .+,#&&)*+,+2 µ+*"E(7*12 > &?-'(" *#µ<-.

*#+,µ& µ#-./0)J .(7:%&µ)2 *72 1,+%-"2 ".'*1(+&+ *' #"*,'-'&7-

(+%*#!) .,'&A.#!) *'% KFLM9 !"# *' $+/0µ" +.#(16:7!+ µ+ *7 µ1:'$' *72 $+#0µ"*'(7C/"2 +%!'(/"2, $7("$> +.#-(16:7!"- &%µµ+*16'-*+2 .'% >*"- .,):%µ'#, $#":1&#µ'# 0#" *7 µ+(1*7 !"# %.)0,"C"- *' «P-*%.' &%-"/-+&72» !"# *7- /$#" &*#0µ> ".'*+('?&"- .,'&A.#!) *A- &%0!+!,#-µ1-A- N(#-#!<- > 3'-4$A-/Qµ7µ4*A- *'% J,0"-#&µ'? 0#" *#2 '.'/+2 $):7!+ 10!,#&7 &%µµ+*'6>2 &*7- 1,+%-". H%0!+!,#µ1-", *' $+/0µ" *72 1,+%-"2 ".'*1(+&"- 80 µ1(7 *'% #"*,'-'&7(+%*#!'? .,'&A.#!'? *'% KFLM9, $7("$> 1-" .'&'&*) 6,9% *'% &%-'(#!'? .(7:%&µ'? *72 µ+(1*72 (1.162 µ1(7). F.) *'%2 80 &%µµ+*16'-*+2, '# 46 "->!"- &*' -'&7(+%*#!) .,'&A.#!) (-'&7(+%*12 !"# E'-7:'/ -'&7(+%*<-), .'% ".'*+('?- 1-" .'&'&*) 7,8% *'% &%-)('% *'% -'&7(+%*#!'? .,'&A.#!'? (n=596) !"# 34 "->!"- &*' #"*,#!) .,'&A.#!), .'% ".'*+('?- 1-" .'-&'&*) 6% *'% &%-)('% *A- #"*,<- (n=566).

!1--2,3 $#$2µ.454!"#$% &'( )*"+$% ,-% .*/0+'%

9 1,+%-" .,"0µ"*'.'#>:7!+ &+ 5 N(#-#!12 (K-+%µ'--'('0#!>, R%6#"*,#!>, K"#$#"*,#!>, J;:"(µ'('0#!>, L"-&*,+-*+,'('0#!>) !"# 4 3'-4$+2/Qµ>µ"*" (3'-4$" I-*"-*#!>2 S+,".+/"2 K"/$A-, 3'-4$" I-*"*#!>2 S+,".+/"2 I-7(/!A-, 3'-4$" F#µ'$'&/"2 !"# Qµ>µ" I.+#0)-*A- K+,#&*"*#!<-) KFLM9 !"*4 *'%2 µ>-+2 T'?(#' 1A2 !"# J!*<E,#' 2016. J# .",".4-A $'µ12 ".'*+('?- .+,/.'% *' 20% *A- 46 N(#-#!<- !"# 3'-4$A-/Qµ7µ4*A- .'% $#-":1*+# *' KFLM9.

1.2$3$% 4055$67% 3/3$µ.+8+9 &%(('0> $+$'µ1-A- 10#-+ µ+ *7 6,>&7 +,A*7µ"*'-

('0/'% &*7- +((7-#!> 0(<&&". 9 $#"-'µ> *'% +,A*7µ"-*'('0/'% 10#-+ ".) *#2 /$#+2 *#2 +,+%->*,#+2 &*#2 !(#-#!12 *'% KFLM9. K,#- ".) *7 $#"-'µ> *'% +,A*7µ"*'('0/'% +-7µ+,<:7!"- '# .,'B&*4µ+-'#/+2 -'&7(+%*12/*,#+2 !"# #"*,'/ *A- "-*/&*'#6A- !(#-#!<- 0#" *7 $#+="0A0> *72 1,+%-"2. I./&72, &*'%2 &%µµ+*16'-*+2 $):7!"- 0,".*12 +=70>&+#2 &6+*#!4 µ+ *' &!'.) *72 1,+%-"2, *7 $7µ'&/-+%&7 *A- ".'*+(+&µ4*A-, *'- +:+('-*#!) 6","!*>," *72 1,+%-"2, *7 $#"&;4(#&7 *72 "-A-%µ/"2 !":<2 !"# *7- *>,7&7 *72 +6+µ?:+#"2, "((4 !"# .,';',#!12 +=70>&+#2 ".) *#2 /$#+2 *#2 +,+%->*,#+2 !"*4 *7 $#"-'µ> *A- +,A*7-µ"*'('0/A-. J 6,)-'2 &%µ.(>,A&72 *'% +,A*7µ"*'('-0/'% !%µ"/-'-*"- ".) 10 1A2 15 (+.*4, +-< &*'%2 &%µ-µ+*16'-*+2 $):7!+ 6,'-#!) .+,#:<,#' $?' +E$'µ4$A- 0#" *7 &%µ.(>,A&7 !"# +.#&*,';> *'%2. H+ !4:+ !(#-#!>

Page 4: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

[32] !""#$%&' (!)%'*%&' +#, $',#"!-+%&#, !(%,+#.#,

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"# $%&'#" ()* !" +%,,-(. /*) 0',*1" !2# $32!"µ*!--,-(42# $45$ - 63-7+!8µ$#-9 . - :)$%&%#!.9 !"9 /,)#)/.9.

!"#$%&'( )*%%(#+, -&-(µ./0/;)* !" µ<!3"+" !"9 +%5#=!"!*9 /*) !-% >*&µ-' </-

&$+"9 !2# $3(*?-µ<#2# +$ mobbing 53"+)µ-6-).&"/$ <#* $32!"µ*!-,=()- *#45#$%+"9 *3#"!)/@# +%µ6$3)0--3@#, !- Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) (Einarsen et al 2009). A- NAQ-R *6-!$,$4 *#*&$23"µ<-#" </:-+" !-% *35)/-' NAQ, /*) +5$:)8+!"/$ µ$ +/-6= !"# /*&)<32+" µ)*9 *1)=6)+!"9, <(/%3"9, 6$3)$/!)/.9 /*) +5$!)/8 µ)/3.9 /,4µ*/*9, 6-% 0!)85!"/$ ()* #* 53"-+)µ-6-)"&$4 +$ µ4* 6-)/),4* :)*0-3$!)/@# $6*(($,µ*!)-/@# 6$3)>*,,=#!2#. B !$,$%!*4* *#*&$23"µ<#" </:-+" $3$%#8 !" +%5#=!"!* !"9 </&$+"9 !2# +%µµ$!$5=#!2# +$ 22 :)*0-3$!)/-'9 !'6-%9 *#$6)&'µ"!"9 /*) *3#"!)/.9 +%µ6$3)0-389, -) -6-4$9 /%µ*4#-#!*) *6= *#$6*4+&"!$9 /*) <µµ$+$9 6381$)9, =629 !- /-%!+-µ6-,)=, <29 6-,' 6)- 8µ$+$9 +%µ6$3)0-3<9, =629 *6$),<9 +2µ*!)/.9 /*-/-6-4"+"9. C,$9 -) $32!.+$)9 <5-%# :)*µ-302&$4 µ$ =3-%9 +%µ6$3)0-389, 52349 #* (4#$!*) /*µ4* *#*0-38 +!-# =3- bullying . mobbing. D*+)+µ<#-) +!)9 $µ6$)34$9 !-%9 *6= !-# $3(*+)*/= !-%9 5@3- !-%9 !$,$%!*4-%9 <1) µ.#$9, ?"!.&"/$ *6= !-%9 $32!@µ$#-%9 #* :",@+-%# 6=+- +%5#8 $/!<&"/*# +!)9 22 *3#"!)/<9 +%µ6$3)0--3<9 >8+" µ)*9 5->*&µ"9 /,4µ*/*9 6-% $/!$4#$!*) *6= !- «6-!<», <29 !- «/8&$ µ<3*» (6-!<, +68#)*, µ)* 0-38 !- µ.#*, µ)* 0-38 !"# $>:-µ8:*, /8&$ µ<3*). E!+), %F",=-!$3" >*&µ-,-(4* %6-:",@#$) %F",=!$3" +%5#=!"!* $µ-08#)+"9 *3#"!)/@# +%µ6$3)0-3@# µ$ 53-#)/= -34?-#!* !-%9 !$,$%!*4-%9 6 µ.#$9.

;)* #* :)$3$%#"&$4 *# -) +%µµ$!<5-#!$9 $4#*) &'µ*!* mobbing $0*3µ=+!"/$ !- /3)!.3)- !"9 *%!-*#*0-3)/.9 63-+<(()+"9 6-% 63-!$4#-%# -) Notelaers & Einarsen (2009 *#*0-38 +!- Nielsen et al 2011), +'µ02#* µ$ !"# -6-4* (4#$!*) µ<!3"+" !"9 +%#-,)/.9 >*&µ-,-(4*9 !2# $32!@µ$#2# +!)9 22 $32!.+$)9 !-% GHQ /*) +!" +%#<5$)*, -) $32!@µ$#-) /*!"(-3)-6-)-'#!*) *#8,-(* µ$ !" >*&µ-,-(4* +$ *%!-'9 6-%: *) :$# <5-%# %6-+!$4 mobbing (>*&µ-,-(4* <33), >) <5-%# %6-+!$4 mobbing µ$3)/<9 0-3<9 (>*&µ-,-(4* 33 <29 44) /*) () $4#*) &'µ*-!* mobbing (>*&µ-,-(4* >44).

I$!8 !)9 22 63-!8+$)9 */-,-'&"+$ µ4* $3@!"+" 6-% µ$!3-'+$ !"# *%!-*#*0$3=µ$#" &%µ*!-6-4"+" *6= mobbing /*!8 !" :)83/$)* !2# 6 !$,$%!*42# µ"#@# (>8+$) !"9 4:)*9 5->*&µ"9 /,4µ*/*9), *0-' $45$ 6*3-%-+)*+!$4 +!-%9 +%µµ$!<5-#!$9 <#*9 6*(/=+µ)* *6-:$-/!=9 -3)+µ=9 !-% $/0->)+µ-' +!"# $3(*+4* (Einarsen & Skogstad1996, Salin 2001 *#*0-38 +!- Einarsen et al 2009). J!" +%#<5$)*, ?"!.&"/$ *6= !-%9 +%µµ$!<5-#!$9 #* *#*0<3-%# *6= 6-)-%9 :<5&"/*# $/0->)+µ= (*6= !-# 8µ$+* 63-7+!8µ$#-, *6= 8,,-%9 63-7+!*µ<#-%9/:)$%&%-#!<9 +!-# -3(*#)+µ=, *6= +%#*:<,0-%9, *6= %0)+!8µ$-

#-%9, *6= 6$,8!$9/*+&$#$49/0-)!"!<9 /,6 . *6= 8,,-%9), *,,8 /*) !- 0',- /*) !-# *3)&µ= !2# :3*+!@#.

K6)6,<-#, µ<+* *6= *%!<9 !)9 22 $32!.+$)9 /*!*(38-0"/*# !3$)9 63-+:)-3)+!)/-4 6*38(-#!$9 6-% 5*3*/!"-34+!"/*# 29 «63-+26)/=9 (personal) $/0->)+µ=9» (+$ *%!=# $#!8++-#!*) +%µ6$3)0-3<9 =629 " :)8:-+" /-%-!+-µ6-,)@# . 0"µ@#), «$/0->)+µ=9 6-% +5$!4?$!*) µ$ !"# $3(*+4* (work-related)» (+%µ6$3)0-3<9 =629 " 6*3*-/38!"+" 6,"3-0-3)@# 6-% $6"3$8?-%# !"# *6=:-+" !-% &'µ*!-9) /*) «+2µ*!)/=9 (physical intimidating forms) $/0->)+µ=9» (+%µ6$3)0-3<9 =629 <#!-#$9 02#<9 /*) 1*0#)/. -3(.) (Nielsen et al 2011), -) -6-4-) µ6-3-'# /*) #* /*!*!81-%# !-# $/0->)+µ= +!)9 !3$)9 *%!<9 *#!4+!-)5$9 µ-30<9 !-%. ;)* #* µ$!3"&$4 " </&$+" !-% /8&$ *!=µ-% +$ /8&$ <#*# *6= !-%9 6*3*68#2 6*38(-#!$9 *3/$4 #* µ$-!3"&$4 " >*&µ-,-(4* !-% +$ µ4* +$)38 *6= !)9 22 $32!.+$)9 !-% GAQ-R /*) 6)- +%(/$/3)µ<#* !"# </&$+" +$ 63-+26)-/= $/0->)+µ= µ$!38#$ -) $32!.+$)9 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 20, +$ $/0->)+µ= 6-% +5$!4?$!*) µ$ !"# $3(*+4* -) $32!.+$)9 1, 3, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21 /*) +$ +2µ*!)/= $/0-->)+µ= -) $32!.+$)9 8, 9, 22.

123(43)5'$ 6$3 &#6*"7585$ &"058µ$5(%(#'(*A- NAQ-R <5$) !%6-6-)"&$4 +$ *3/$!<9 5@3$9 !-%

/=+µ-%, =629 " L*62#4*, -) BMH, !- B#2µ<#- D*+4-,$)-, *,,8 /*) +!)9 J/*#:)#*>)/<9 5@3$9. E3$%#$9 *6= !" G-3>"(4* /*) !- B#2µ<#- D*+4,$)- <:$)1*# µ$(8," *1)-6)+!4* $+2!$3)/. +%#<6$)*9 (Cronbach’s alpha 6$-346-% +!- 0,90) (Kakoulakis et al 2015). K6)6,<-#, <3$%-#$9 <5-%# :$41$) =!) !- $3(*,$4- :)*&<!$) 83)+!" $(/%3=-!"!* $##-)-,-()/.9 /*!*+/$%.9 /*&@9 /*) $(/%3=!"!* /3)!"34-% (Nielsen et al 2011). A- $32!"µ*!-,=()- <5$) µ$!*03*+!$4 /*) 53"+)µ-6-)"&$4 +$ <3$%#$9 +!"# K,,8-:* +!"# *35)/. !-% (Galanaki & Papalexandris 2011), *,,8 /*) +!"# *#*&$23"µ<#" !-% µ-30. (Kakoulakis et al 2015, Karatza et al 2016), " -6-4* 53"+)µ-6-)$4!*) /*) +!"# 6*3-'+* <3$%#*. J!)9 6*3*68#2 6$3)6!@+$)9, !- $3(*,$4- $µ08#)+$ µ$(8," *1)-6)+!4* $+2!$3)/.9 +%#<-6$)*9 (µ$ Cronbach’s alpha = 0,904, 0,915 /*) 0,90 *#!4-+!-)5*) /*&@9 /*) $(/%3=!"!* /3)!"34-%.

9-&3$ :"+)8, 6$3 µ&5;<"$)8 5(* NAQ-R;)* !" 53.+" !-% NAQ-R 5-3"(.&"/$ 8:$)* +!)9 $3$%-

#.!3)$9 *6= !-# N*&"("!. Staale Einarsen !-% Bergen Bullying Research Group. ;)* !"# $,,"#)/. </:-+" !2# 23 63@!2# $32!.+$2# !-% NAQ-R 53"+)µ-6-).&"/$ " µ$!803*+" *6= !"# <3$%#* !2# Kakoulakis et al (2015). B µ$!803*+" !2# $32!.+$2# 24 /*) 25, 6-% <,$)6*# *6= !"# <3$%#* !2# Kakoulakis et al (2015) 63*(µ*!-6-).&"-/$ ()* !)9 *#8(/$9 !"9 6*3-'+*9 <3$%#*9 µ$ !" µ<&-:- !"9 *#!4+!3-0"9 µ$!803*+"9 (Trust Scientific Advisory Committee 2002). ;)* !"# 6-,)!)+µ)/. 63-+*3µ-(., -) $32!.+$)9 5-3"(.&"/*# +$ !%5*4- :$4(µ* 10 #-+",$%!@#

Page 5: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

!"#"$ 11 - !%&'"$ 2 [33]

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!" !#!$!" %&'()*+,- .", '!- /,)µ0 +,',-0*1*2 '!32 +," ,- 4#")3µ!51,- -, ,66,7)4$ µ$, 4%8'*1* ( µ$, 9%:1* 81'4 -, .$-!3- !" 4%&'(14"2 #"! +,',-!*';2. <4- 3#(%=4 +,µ$, 151',1* .", ,66,.( 9%:14&- ( #%!':14&-.

!"µ#$# %&'()*-+,-.$-/-01#*> 13µµ4'!7( '&- 4%&'8µ4-&- 1'*- ;%43-, (',-

4)46!-'"+(, 4-8 '*%()*+4 * ,-&-3µ$, '&- ,#,-'(14&-.

> 13.+;-'%&1* '&- ?4?!µ;-&- ;."-4 15µ9&-, µ4 '!32 +,-0-42 ?4!-'!6!.$,2 +," 7,%,+'*%$@4'," ,#0 14/,1µ0 #%!2 ', :'!µ, +," '!- 78%! 1'!- !#!$! #%,.µ,'!#!"()*-+4 * ;%43-,. A"! 13.+4+%"µ;-,, #%"- ,#0 '*- ;-,%=* '*2 1366!.(2 ?4?!µ;-&- 4=,19,6$1'*+4 * 13-,$-41* '&- 13µµ4'470-'&- µ;1, ,#0 '*- 3#!/!6( '!3 «B-'5#!3 13-,$-41*2 ?!+"µ,@0µ4-!3 14 4%43-*'"+( 4%.,1$,» #!3 3#0.%,C,- 06!" !" 13µµ4';7!-'42, ,66: +," * 13-,$-4-

!"#$%$& 1: '()µ*%+, ,-$..,/µ$(*%+ %$* µ)012(*%+ 3$0$%(40*5(*%+ 56µµ,(,37#(2#

!"#$%&

'("%)*%

20 +,& 30

30 +,& 40

40 +,& 50

50 +,& 60

60 *%- .",

/01234(#-*5 6$01,7-*5

8%#$-*5 6$01,7-*5

9%#+:4- ;+12 7$0<01#%µ+"0(

=4" *%#+:4- ;+12 7$0<1#%µ+"0(

=4" %7."#21%"

>?30

@3-*)%

A-B-*5#2#%

C+12 1#2" -4$%$:)% D-% #0 "01234(#-*5 7$01,7-*5

/

28

52

13

20

35

10

2

46

34

6

40

34

%

35,0%

65,0%

16,3%

25,0%

43,8%

12,5%

2,5%

57,5%

42,5%

7,5/13,0%*

50,0/87,0%*

42,5%

!"µ#$%&". '( )(µ*+ #,-./012)3( &# 34567)#+ (8) ,3( &9#)(,*+ &7925)")#+ (%) #4$ )17 &725617 )17 :#$;µ3)1+, #,)5+ ,3( 32 :"6<2#)3( :(3-1.#)(,/* =1&1&)5 #4$ )17 &725617 )%2 3432)>&#%2

A-B-*4(µ+"0& E("#0"-1#F& =-4(;("#F&

=-4(;("#F&

A7-µ432#F& G'

A7-µ432#F& H'

A-B-*4(5µ4"0&

=4" %7."#21%"

0-5

5-10

10-20

20-30

>30

0-5

5-10

10-20

20-30

6#(:)0 =A

6#(:)0 IA

6#(:)0 6A

C+12 1#2" -4$%$:)% D-% #0 -%#$-*5 7$01,7-*5

J$5"-% 1("03-*F& 47%DD43µ%#-*F& 4µ74-$)%&

J$5"-% 47%DD43µ%#-*F& 4µ74-$)%& 1#0" 0$D%"-1µ5

A7)74B0 K%1-*L" 170(BL"

3

4

5

5

17

46

19

11

19

29

2

27

13

16

24

10

31

39

3,8/8,8%*

5,0/11,8%*

6,3/14,7%*

6,3/14,7%*

21,3/50,0%*

57,5%

23,8%

13,8%

23,8%

36,3%

2,5%

33,8%

16,3%

20,0%

30,0%

12,5%

38,8%

48,8%

Page 6: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

[34] !""#$%&' (!)%'*%&' +#, $',#"!-+%&#, !(%,+#.#,

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!" #$% &$'() !#$* $+$,$ +')-µ)#$+$./0"12 " ('2%*), µ2 (-1'.!" #$% 3+.!#"µ$*.1$4 5%µ6$%7,$% #$% 89:;< (9.8. 9694/20.07.2016) 1). µ2 #"* (-1'.!" ('2%*)= #$% >+$%'-2,$% >-2,)= (9.8. 11134/05.08.2016). ?(7$=, $. !%µµ2#(@$*#2= +7"'$&$'/0"1)* -.) #"* #/'"!" #"= 2@2-µ402.)= #A* !#$.@2,A* #"= ('2%*)= µ(!) )+B #" «C/7A-!" ?/'"!"= 3@2µ402.)=».

!"#"$%"$&' #()*+%,D'"!.µ$+$./0"12 +2'.-')&.1/ !#)#.!#.1/ -.) #"*

+)'$%!,)!" #A* )#$µ.1E*, 2+)--27µ)#.1E* 1). µ$'&A-#.1E* @)')1#"'.!#.1E* #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A*. :.) *) F.2-'2%*"02, " !@(!" )*Gµ2!) !#" 6)0µ$7$-,) !#.= 2'A#/-!2.= #$% NAQ-R 1). #$ &47$, #"* 2.F.1B#"#), #" 0(!" #$% *$!"72%#.1$4 +'$!A+.1$4 !#"* .2')'@,) @'"!.µ$+$./-0"12 #$ µ" +)')µ2#'.1B !#)#.!#.1B #2!# Mann Withney U, µ2 #$ $+$,$ !%-1',*$*#). $. µ(!$. B'$. #"= 6)0µ$7$--,)= #A* %+$$µGFA* +$% !@"µ)#,H$*#). !4µ&A*) µ2 #) +)')+G*A @)')1#"'.!#.1G. C2* +'$#.µ/0"12 #$ t-test -.)#, #) F2F$µ(*) #A* µ2#)67"#E* F2* )1$7$%0$4* #"* 1)*$*.1/ 1)#)*$µ/. :.) #$* (72-@$ #"= 1)*$*.1B#"#)= 2&)'µB!#"1)* #) #2!# Kolmogorov-Smirnov / Shapiro-Wilk 1)#G +2',+#A!", #) $+$,) (F2.I)* !#)#.!#.1/ !"µ)-*#.1B#"#) <0,05 (µ" 1)*$*.1/ 1)#)*$µ/ #"= 6)0µ$7$-,)= #A* F.G&$'A* $µGFA* !#.= 17,µ)12= #$% NAQ-R). :.) *) F.2'2%*"02, " !@(!" )*Gµ2!) !#" 6)0µ$7$-,) !#.= 17,-µ)12= #$% NAQ-R 1). #"* "7.1,), #" 0(!" #$% .)#'.1$4 +'$!A+.1$4 !#"* .2')'@,), #) @'B*.) !%*$7.1/= 2+)---27µ)#.1/= 2µ+2.',)= 1). #$ 6)!.1B 2+,+2F$ !+$%FE*, @'"!.µ$+$./0"12 #$ µ" +)')µ2#'.1B !#)#.!#.1B #2!# Kruskal-Wallis H, 1)0E= #) F2F$µ(*) #A* µ2#)67"#E* F2* )1$7$%0$4!)* 1)*$*.1/ 1)#)*$µ/. :.) #"* )*G7%-!" #A* F2F$µ(*A* @'"!.µ$+$./0"12 #$ !#)#.!#.1B +'B--')µµ) IBM SPSS Statistics V.23.

!"#$%&%'(!$!9+B #) 150 2'A#"µ)#$7B-.) +$% F.)*2µ/0"1)*, !%-

µ+7"'E0"1)* #) 80 (+$!$!#B )+B1'.!"= 53,33%). 3I )%-#E* #$ 65% /#)* -%*),12=, #$ 57,5% /#)* *$!"72%#(= 1). 6$"0$, *$!"72%#E* 1). #$ 42,5% .)#'$,. ?$ 6)!.1B 2+,-+2F$ !+$%FE* #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* /#)* 83 !2 +$!$!#B 48,8%, ?3 38,8% 1). C3 12,5%. ?$ 87% #$% *$!"72%#.1$4 +'$!A+.1$4 F2* 1)#2,@2 0(!" +'$J!#)µ(*$% 1). #$ 50% #A* .)#'E* /#)* 2.F.12%Bµ2*$.. K= +'$= #) @'B*.) 2+)---27µ)#.1/= 2µ+2.',)= #$ 36,3% 2,@2 20-30 @'B*.) 2+)---27µ)#.1/= 2µ+2.',)= (8,*)1)= 1).

< !%@*B#"#) 6,A!"= )'*"#.1E* !%µ+2'.&$'E* #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* #$%= #272%#),$%= (I. µ/*2= +)'$%!.G-H2#). !#$* 8,*)1) 2. < µ$'&/ mobbing +$% 2µ&)*,H2#). !%@*B#2'), !4µ&A*) µ2 #.= F"7E!2.= #A* !%µµ2#2@B-*#A*, 2,*). #$ mobbing +$% !@2#,H2#). µ2 #"* 2'-)!,), µ2 #.= 2'A#/!2.= 3, 4 1). 21 *) I2@A',H$%* .F.),#2') 1)0E= 35,9%, 27,5% 1). 29,1% #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* )*#,!#$.@)

)*)&('$%* B#. (@$%* 6.E!2. )%#(= #.= !%µ+2'.&$'(= #$%7G@.!#$* µ,) &$'G #"* 26F$µGF) / /1). !%@*B#2'). < !%*$7.1/ 6)0µ$7$-,) #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* (Total Score) !#.= #'2.= %+$17,µ)12= 1). !#$ !4*$7$ #$% NAQ-R, %+$-7$-,!#"12 µ2 #$* L.M. #"= 6)0µ$7$-,)= #$% !%*B7$% #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* !#.= )*#,!#$.@2= %+$17,µ)12=. N#!., $ L.M. #"= !%*$7.1/= 6)0µ$7$-,)= #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* !#$ !4*$7$ #$% NAQ-R 6'(0"12 *) 2,*). 42,06 (±13,82), B!$* )&$'G !#.= 2'A#/!2.= +$% &)*2'E*$%* mobbing +$% !@2#,H2#). µ2 #"* 2'-)!,) 16,16 (±5,51), +'$!A+.-1B mobbing 21,25 (±7,72) 1). !Aµ)#.1B mobbing 4,65 (±1,89).

M 6)0µB= @)')1#"'.!µ$4 #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* A= 0%µG#A* !4µ&A*) µ2 #"* )%#$)*)&$'.1/ +'$!(--.!" 1). #$ 1'.#/'.$ #A* Notelaers & Einarsen (2009 )*)&$-'G !#$ Nielsen et al 2011), +)'$%!.GH2#). !#$* 8,*)1) 3. 54µ&A*) µ2 )%#B, #$ 41,3% #A* !%µµ2#2@B*#A* @)')-1#"',H$*#). A= 04µ)#) !$6)'$4 mobbing, 2*E #$ 27,5% A= 04µ)#) +2'.!#)!.)1$4 mobbing.

O)#G #"* )I.$7B-"!" #$% 6)0µ$4 )*)-*E'.!"= #"= 0%µ)#$+$,"!"= )+B #) ,F.) #) 04µ)#) (2'E#"!" NAQ-R 23) )&$4 #$%= (@2. F$02, (*)= $'.!µB= #$% mobbing (+'$!(--.!" )%#$@)')1#"'.!µ$4) 6'(0"12 B#. 35 )+B #) 80 G#$µ) (43,7%) (@$%* %+$!#2, 1G+$.$ 2,F$= mobbing. 9*)7%#.1B#2'), 56,3% )*)&('$%* B#. F2* (@$%* %+$!#2, 1)0B7$% mobbing, 28,7% B#. (@$%* %+$!#2, !+G*.), 8,8% µ,) &$'G )*G µ/*), 3,8% µ,) &$'G )*G 26F$µGF) 1). 2,5% 1G02 µ('). 54µ&A*) µ2 #$ 1'.#/'.$ #"= 2µ&G*.-!"= #$% &).*$µ(*$% !2 #$%7G@.!#$* 26F$µ)F.),) 6G!", +'$14+#2. B#. #$ &).*Bµ2*$ 2µ&)*,H2#). !2 (*) 6,3% #$% !%*B7$% #A* 2'A#Eµ2*A*.

?$ 48,6% #A* 0%µG#A* )*)-*E'.!)* #$%= F'G!#2= A= +27G#2=/)!02*2,=/&$.#"#(= 17+, #$ 42,9% A= !%*)-F(7&$%= #$%=, #$ 25,7% A= #$* Gµ2!$ +'$J!#Gµ2*B #$%=, #$ 20,0% A= G77$%= +'$J!#)µ(*$%=/F.2%0%*#(= !#$* $'--)*.!µB, 2*E µB7.= #$ 5,7% A= %&.!#)µ(*$%= #$%=. 3*E, A= +'$= #$ &47$ #A* F')!#E*, #$ 44,8% #A* 0%µG#A* )*)-*E'.!)* #$%= F'G!#2= A= G*F'2=, #$ 31% A= -%*),-12= 1). #$ 24,1% 1). )+B #) F4$ &47). ?(7$=, A= +'$= #$* )'.0µB #A* F')!#E*, #$ 33,3% #A* 0%µG#A* )*)-*E'.-

!"#$%$& 3. '$($%)*(+,µ-& ,.µµ/)/0-#)1# ,2µ31#$ µ/ )*# $.)4$#$34(+%5 6(4,788+,* %$+ )4 %(+)5(+4 )1# Notelaers &

Eninarsen (NAQ-R 22)

%)*+, -.µ+ mobbing (NAQ Score > 44)

/01, 234561) mobbing µ17,89: ;479:

(NAQ Score 33 (A= 44)

<1* 901, 234561) mobbing (NAQ Score<33)

54*$7$

= % !-7 %

33

22

28

80

41,3

27,5

31,3

100,0

41,3

68,8

100,0

Page 7: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

!"#"$ 11 - !%&'"$ 2 [35]

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"#$%$& 2: '()*+,-& +.µµ,/,01#/2# +0,/-%3 µ, /( +.0#1/(/$ 4"2+(& $5#(/-%*# +.µ6,5-785*# /8. NAQ-R /8.& /,),./$"8.& 6 µ9#,& (NAQ-R 22)

!.". (#.$.)**

%&'()* !)* +,-' *('

µ.(*

!)* +,-' *('

/01,µ'1*

2'3/ µ4-*22. 567, 789(' 49/:/ 8&,7:/; <'3/ µ)* *&6 :)= 78µ&/-)+,-4= *8:4= :,8=

:/>/8:*;,8= 6 µ.(/=

5,:4 !;* +,-' *(' /01,µ'1*

./<*) <'3/ µ4-**

1. %*= *&,<-?&:,(:*) &>@-,+,-;/= &,8

/&@-/'A,8( :@( *&61,7. 7*=

2. BC/8:/>;A/7:/ . D/>,),&,)/;7:/

79/:)<' µ/ :@ 1,8>/)' 7*=

3. %*= *(*:;3/:*) 1,8>/)' C/<'3*-*

<*:E:/-@ :,8 /&)&41,8 )<*(,:.:F( 7*=

4. %@µ*(:)<4= &/-),94= /83?(@= 7*=

7*= *+*)-,?(:*) . *(:)<*3;7:*(:*) µ/

:/:-)µµ4(* . *7.µ*(:* <*3.<,(:*

5. G.µ/= <*) <,8:7,µ&,>)' 1)*1;1,(:*)

D)* 7*=

6.BC*)-/;7:/ . *&,<>/;/7:/ *&6

1)*1)<*7;/= <*) <,)(F()<' D/D,(6:*

7. 5-,70>@:)<' . /&)3/:)<' 796>)* D)*

/7'= (&.9. 78(.3/)/= . &*-/>36() <*) :@(

&-,7F&)<. 7*= AF.

8. %*= +F('A,8( . D;(/7:/ 7:69,=

*D*('<:@7@= . 38µ,?

9. B<+,0)7:)<. 78µ&/-)+,-', 6&F=

/)70,>. 7:,( &-,7F&)<6 7*= 9E-,,

7&-EC)µ,, <>/;7)µ, &/-'7µ*:,= <.*.

10. H&6(,)/= . 7@µ'1)* *&6 '>>,8= 6:)

3* 4&-/&/ (* &*-*:.7/:/ :@ 1,8>/)' 7*=

11. %*= 8&/(38µ;A,(:*) 78(/9E= :*

>'3@ <*) ,) &*-*>/;I/)= 7*=

12. %*= *D(,,?( . D;(,(:*) /&)3/:)<,;

/(*(:;,( 7*= 6:*( /&)9/)-/;:/ (*

&-,7/DD;7/:/

13. BC*<,>,83@:)<. <-):)<. :@=

1,8>/)'= <*) :@= &-,7&'3/)'= 7*=

14. J D(Eµ@ <*) ,) *&6I/)= 7*=

*D(,,?(:*)

15. K;(/7:/ *&,14<:/= +*-7E( –

*7:/;F( *&6 ':,µ* &,8 1/( 7*=

78µ&*3,?(

16. %*= 1;(,(:*) <*3.<,(:* µ/

&*-'>,D,8= . *1?(*:,8= 7:69,8=

./<*) &-,3/7µ;/=

20 (25,0)

51 (64,6)

12(15,4)

22 (27,5)

27 (34,2)

45 (56,3)

41 (51,9)

28 (35,4)

61 (77,2)

59 (74,7)

31 (39,2)

46 (57,5)

27 (33,8)

25 (31,6)

59 (74,7)

30 (37,5)

37 (46,3)

18 (22,8)

22 (28,2)

21 (26,3)

27 (34,2)

25 (31,3)

25 (31,6)

27 (34,2)

10 (12,7)

13 (16,5)

34 (43,0)

24 (30,0)

26 (32,5)

33 (41,8)

13 (16,5)

31 (38,8)

8 (10,0)

5 (6,3)

16 (20,5)

15 (18,8)

12 (15,2)

5 (6,3)

6 (7,6)

15 (19,0)

7 (8,9)

7 (8,9)

8 (10,1)

8 (10,0)

20 (25,0)

5 (6,3)

3 (3,8)

10 (12,5)

9 (11,3)

4 (5,1)

16 (20,5)

12 (15,0)

5 (6,3)

3 (3,8)

3 (3,8)

4 (5,1)

1 (1,3)

0 (0,0)

5 (6,3)

2 (2,5)

4 (5,0)

5 (6,3)

3 (3,8)

6 (7,5)

6 (7.5)

1 (1,3)

12 (15,4)

10 (12,5)

8 (10,1)

2 (2,5)

4 (5,1)

5 (6,3)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (1,3)

0 (0,0)

3 (3,8)

5 (6,3)

1 (1,3)

3 (3,8)

15 (18,8)

5 (6,4)

28 (35,9)

22 (27,5)

13 (16,4)

5 (6,3)

7 (8,9)

9 (11,4)

1 (1,3)

0 (0,0)

6 (7,6)

2 (2,5)

7 (8,8)

10 (12,6)

4 (5,1)

9 (11,3)

2,30 (1,18)

1,56 (0,92)

2,92 (1,32)

2,59 (1,37)

2,24 (1,28)

1,65 (0,94)

1,78 (1,08)

2,13 (1,15)

1,34 (0,70)

1,34 (0,64)

1,87 (0,96)

1,58 (0,78)

2,12 (1,06)

2,14 (1,13)

1,41 (0,84)

2,01 (1,07)

Page 8: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

[36] !""#$%&' (!)%'*%&' +#, $',#"!-+%&#, !(%,+#.#,

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"# $%#& "$' ()!!*+,- .+%!(*-, (/ 27,8% .0/ .+%!(*-, (/ 16,7% ()!!*+,- .+%!(*- 1", )#"# .+%!(2 1", (/ 5,6% (+*,- .+%!(*-.

3 .,*+*0#2!2 (2- !4)!2- "#%µ*!" !* "(/µ,1/0-, *$"55*6µ"(,1/0- 1", µ/+7&(,1/0- $"+%5/#(*- (&# 89-µ%(&# 1", (/ :"8µ' 4"+"1(2+,!µ/0 (&# !9µµ*(*4'#(&# &- 89µ%(&# !0µ7&#" µ* (2# "9(/"#"7/+,1; $+/!)5-5,!2, .26".; (/# <.=. (&# "$"#(;!*&# !(,- 22 *+&(;-!*,- (/9 NAQ-R, $"+/9!,%>*(", !(/# ?@#"1" 4. A"@#*(", '(, .*# 9$%+4*, !("(,!(,1% !2µ"#(,1; .,"7/+% "#%µ*!" !(,- /µ%.*- $/9 !42µ"(@>/#(", !0µ7&#" µ* (/ 706/, (2# 26,1@", (2 8)!2 !(2# ,*+"+4@" 5," (/9- ,"(+/0- 1", (" 4+'#," *$"55*6µ"(,1;- *µ$*,+@"-. B#(@8*(", "$' (2 !051+,!2 (&# µ)!&# '+&# (&# /µ%.&# .,"$,!(C82-1* '(, 9$%+4*, !("(,!(,1% !2µ"#(,1; .,"7/+% "#%µ*!" !(/9- <.=. (&# /µ%.&# $/9 !42µ"(@>/#(",: ") !0µ7&#" µ* (2# *,.,1'(2(" [(U(46,34)=524,5, p=0,012<0,05] 5," (/ !9#/6,1' mobbing 1", [U(46,34)=409,5, p=0,000<0,05] 5," (/ mobbing $/9 !4*(@>*(", µ* (2# *+5"!@", µ* (/ ,"-(+,1' $+/!&$,1' #" *µ7"#@>*, 9D26'(*+/9- µ)!/9- '+/9- (<.=.=47,44±16,46 1", <.=.=18,88±5,98) "$' (/ #/!26*9(,1' (<.=.=38,09±9,93 1", <.=.=14,15±5,98) 5," (/ !9#/6,1' mobbing 1", (/ mobbing$/9 !4*(@>*(", µ* (2# *+5"!@" "#(@!(/,4", :) !0µ7&#" µ* (2 8)!2 !(2# ,*+"+4@" 5," (/ #/!26*9(,1' $+/!&$,1' [U(6,40)=54,0, p=0,030<0,05] !(/ $+/!&$,1' mobbing, µ* (/9- $+/E-!("µ)#/9- #" *µ7"#@>/9# µ*5"60(*+/9- µ)!/9- '+/9- (<.=.=23,67±5,16) "$' "9(/0- $/9 .*# 1"()4/9# 8)!2 $+/E!("µ)#/9 (<.=.=18,70±5,14), 5) !0µ7&#" µ* (/ *$@-$*./ :"!,1C# !$/9.C# [H(2)=6,361, p=0,042<0,05] 5," (/ !9#/6,1' mobbing 1", [H(2)=12,342, p=0,002<0,05]

5," (/ mobbing $/9 !4*(@>*(", µ* (2# *+5"!@", µ* (/9- $(94,/04/9- ?F #" *µ7"#@>/9# µ*5"60(*+/9- µ)!/9- '+/9- (<.=.=46,41±16,10 1", <.=.=18,43±6,13) "$' (/9- GF (<.=.=38,87±9,60 1", <.=.=14,34±3,82) 1", (/9- HF (<.=.=35,00±10,04 1", <.=.=12,90±3,70) !(/ !9#/6,1' mobbing 1", (/ mobbing $/9 !4*(@>*(", µ* (2# *+5"!@" "#(@!(/,4".

I"(% (2 .,*+*0#2!2 (2- !4)!2- "#%µ*!" !(/9- @.,/9- $"+%5/#(*- 1", (/ :"8µ' "#"5#C+,!2- (2- 89µ"(/$/@2-!2- "$' (" @.," (" 80µ"(" !0µ7&#" µ* (2# $+/!)55,!2 (/9 "9(/4"+"1(2+,!µ/0, .26".; (/# <.=. (&# "$"#(;!*-&# !(2# *+C(2!2 23 (/9 NAQ-R, :+)821* '(, .*# 9$%+-4*, !("(,!(,1% !2µ"#(,1; .,"7/+% "#%µ*!" !(,- /µ%.*- (?@#"1"- 5).

!"#$%$!$G" "$/(*6)!µ"(" (2- )+*9#"- $/9 $+/)19D"# µ*

(2# "9(/"#"7/+,1; $+/!)55,!2 1", *#(/$@>/9# '(, (/ 41,3% (&# !9µµ*(*4'#(&# "$/(*6/0# 80µ"(" !/:"+/0 mobbing, .,"7)+/9# !2µ"#(,1% µ* *1*@#" (&# *9+&$"-E1C# *+*9#C# $/9 "#"7)+/9# 1"(% µ)!/ '+/ $/!/!(% 3-7%. J!('!/, (/ $/!/!(' 6,3% $/9 $+/10$(*, "$' (2# $+/!)55,!2 (/9 "9(/4"+"1(2+,!µ/0 .*# .,"7)+*, !2µ"-#(,1% "$' (" $/!/!(% 1-4% (&# *9+&$"E1C# *+*9#C# '("# 4+2!,µ/$/,*@(", 2 µ)8/./- (2- )µµ*!2- µ)(+2!2- !* !9#.9"!µ' µ* (2 µ)8/./ (/9 "9(/4"+"1(2+,!µ/0 (Zapf et al 2003).

B#(@!(/,4*- )+*9#*- !(2# F66%.", '$&- 2 )+*9#" (&# Galanaki & Papalexandris (2011) $/9 )5,#* !* 840 1"(C(*+" 1", µ*!"@" .,/,12(,1% !(*6)42 .2µ'!,&# 1", ,.,&(,1C# /+5"#,!µC# (/ 2008, 1"()5+"D* )#" 13% (&#

17. &'()(*+, -./0.'1 ,23/4,2µ)' 2.

564)1 2+1

18. $ 0)/7.,6 2+1 8+4+9)7)/:.'*+,

9+, .7;<3.*+, /8.45)7,96

19. =;3.2*. 8'.2> (+ µ>( +8+,*?2.*.

96*, *) )8)') 0,9+,)@2*. (8.3. 60.,.1,

60.,+ +2:.(.'+1, ;A)0+ *+A,0')/)

20. =;3.2*. /8.45)7,96 8.,46<µ+*+

9+, 2+49+2µB

21. C9*':.2*. 2. µ> 0,+3.,4'2,µ) DB4*)

.4<+2'+1

22. !Eµ+*,9? 9+9)8)'>2> ? +8.,7;1

5'+1

40 (50,6)

24 (30,4)

32 (40,5)

48 (60,8)

14 (17,7)

64 (80,0)

26 (32,9)

29 (36,7)

23 (29,1)

24 (30,4)

27 (34,2)

15 (18,8)

7 (8,9)

15 (19,0)

13 (16,5)

4 (5,1)

15 (19,0)

0 (0,0)

6 (7,6)

5 (6,3)

8 (10,1)

1 (1,3)

18 (22,8)

1 (1,3)

0 (0,0)

6 (7,6)

3 (3,8)

2 (2,5)

5 (6,3)

0 (0,0)

6 (7,6)

11 (13,9)

11 (13,9)

3 (3,8)

23 (29,1)

1 (1,3)

1,73 (0,92)

2,24 (1,18)

2,08 (1,15)

1,54 (0,86)

2,66 (1,20)

1,23 (0,50)

!"µ#$%&". '( )(µ*+ #,-./012)3( %+ 4 (%)#5$ )16 &627816 )16 9#$:µ3)1+ #,)7+ 32 1.$0#)3( 9(3-1.#)(,/.* ;(3 23 *<16µ# µ$3 5(1 =#,/>3." #(,723 #µ-/2(&"+ )%2 3.2")(,?2 &6µ5#.(-1.?2 &# )168/<(&)12 #@91µ39(3$3 @/&" A/,3( &6<27)#.3, 1( 9B1 )#8#6-)3$#+ &)A8#+ 3>.1$&)",32 ** ;(3 ,/># µ$3 #.?)"&" 65181:$&)",# 1 C.'. (D.E.) 357 )(+ 3532)A&#(+ 516 *9%&32 1( &6µµ#)*<12)#+ 32)(&)1(<$012)3+ )(+ )(µ*+ 1,2,3,4,5 &)(+ 32)$&)1(-<#+ 3532)A&#(+ )"+ 5@3>µ"+ ,8$µ3,3+

Page 9: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

!"#"$ 11 - !%&'"$ 2 [37]

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"#$%$& 5. '()*+ ($,$%-+,.*-.%/# -0# *1µµ2-2(3#-0# µ2 -+# $#$4#/,.*+ 5*%+*+& mobbing *-6# 2,4$*.$%3 (/,6 -61& -2721-$"61& 6 µ8#2& (NAQ-R23)

!"#$%&

'("%)*%

20 +,& 30

30 +,& 40

40 +,& 50

50 +,& 60

60 *%- .",

/01234(#-*5 6$01,7-*5

8%#$-*5 6$01,7-*5

9%#+:4- ;+12 7$0<01#%µ+"0(

=4" *%#+:4- ;+12 7$0<1#%µ+"0(

>-?-*4(µ+"0& @("#0"-1#A&

=-4(;("#A&

=-4(;("#A&

>7-µ432#A& B'

>7-µ432#A& C'

>-?-*4(5µ4"0&

0 +,& 5

5 +,& 10

10 +,& 20

20 +,& 30

30 *%- .",

6#(:)0 =>

6#(:)0 D>

6#(:)0 6>

16 (57,1)

29 (55,8)

7 (53,8)

10 (50,0)

21 (60,0)

5 (50,0)

2 (100,0)

26 (56,5)

19 (55,9)

2 (33,3)

25 (62,5)

2 (66,7)

3 (75,0)

2 (40,0)

2 (40,0)

9 (52,9)

11 (57,9)

6 (54,5)

10 (52,6)

16 (55,2)

2 (100,0)

5 (50,0)

19 (61,3)

21 (53,8)

7 (25,0)

16 (30,8)

3 (23,1)

7 (35,0)

10 (28,6)

3 (30,0)

0 (0,0)

16 (34,8)

7 (20,6)

3 (50,0)

12 (30,0)

1 (33,3)

0 (0,0)

2 (40,0)

1 (20,0)

4 (23,5)

5 (26,3)

2 (18,2)

8 (42,1)

8 (27,6)

0 (0,0)

4 (40,0)

9 (29,0)

10 (25,6)

B#0µ-*. :%$%*#2$-1#-*.

9%;530( @7."-% E-% F0$.%".µ2"%

2 (7,1)

5 (9,6)

1 (7,7)

2 (10,0)

2 (5,7)

2 (20,0)

0 (0,0)

2 (4,3)

5 (14,7)

1 (16,7)

1 (2,5)

0 (0,0)

1 (25,0)

1 (20,0)

1 (20,0)

2 (11,8)

1 (5,3)

2 (18,2)

1 (5,3)

3 (10,3)

0 (0,0)

1 (10,0)

1 (3,2)

5 (12,8)

GH30

I3-*)%

>-?-*5#2#%

J+12 1#2" -4$%$:)%

K-% #0(& "01234(#+&

J+12 1#2" -4$%$:)%

K-% #0(& -%#$0H&

L$5"-% 1("03-*A&

47%KK43µ%#-*A&

4µ74-$)%&

>7)74?0 M%1-*N"

170(?N"

E-% F0$.%". 4M?0µ.?%

2 (7,1)

1 (1,9)

2 (15,4)

0 (0,0)

1 (2,9)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (2,2)

2 (5,9)

0 (0,0)

1 (2,5)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

2 (11,8)

2 (10,5)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (3,4)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (3,2)

2 (5,1)

9.;4µ+$%

E.O.(D.B.)*

Test/Sig.

1 (3,6)

1 (1,9)

0 (0,0)

1 (5,0)

1 (2,9)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (2,2)

1 (2,9)

0 (0,0)

1 (2,5)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (20,0)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (9,1)

0 (0,0)

1 (3,4)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (3,2)

1 (2,6)

1,75 (1,11)

1,63 (0,87)

1,85 (1,14)

1,75 (1,10)

1,60 (0,95)

1,70 (0,82)

-

1,59 (0,86)

1,79 (1,09)

1,83 (0,75)

1,53 (0,88)

1,33 (0,58)

1,50 (1,00)

1,80 (0,84)

2,4 (1,67)

1,82 (1,07)

1,68 (1,00)

1,91 (1,30)

1,53 (0,61)

1,72 (1,03)

-

1,60 (0,60)

1,58 (0,96)

1,77 (1,04)

U(28,52)=717,5a

p=,906

H(4)=2,226b

p=,694

U(46,34)=729,5a

p=,567

U(6,40)=84,5a

p=,254

H(4)=1,729b

p=,785

H(4)=1,671b

p=,796

H(2)=,693b

p=,785

!"µ#$%&". '( )(µ*+ #,-./012)3( %+ 4.'. (5.6.) a. Mann Withney Ub. Kruskal-Wallis H

!"µµ#$#%&'$(' ') *)$)$+!!,'$)- !$.' *)$./,01) $(' 2"µ+$(' mobbing µ# $.' )"$,)')3,0-*4 50,!6//-!. *)- 6') 7,3% µ# $.' 50,!6//-!. $," )"$,%)0)*$.0-!µ,7. 8 60#"') $(' Kakoulakis et al (2015), 5," 6/-'# !# 265 #*5)-9#"$-*,7: 50($,;+2µ-): *)- 9#"$#0,;+2µ-): #*-5)19#"!.: $, 2012, *)$6/0)<# 6') 14,4% $(' !"µµ#$#-%&'$(' ') *)$)$+!!,'$)- !$.' *)$./,01) $(' 2"µ+$(' mobbing µ# $.' )"$,)')3,0-*4 50,!6//-!. *)- 6') 16,7% µ# $.' 50,!6//-!. $," )"$,%)0)*$.0-!µ,7.

=6>,:, 60#"'#: 5," 6%,"' #!$-+!#- #-9-*&$#0) !# -)-$0,',!.>#"$-*& 50,!(5-*& #'$,51?,"' µ#/)>7$#0) 5,-!,!$+, &5(: . 60#"') $(' Mc Mahon et al (2013) 5,"

6/-'# !# 2.929 ',!.>#"$6: !$.' @0>)'91) µ# #0($.µ)-$,>&/-, )'1%'#"!.: )0'.$-*A' !"µ5#0-3,0A' *)- *)-$6/0)<# 6') 38,5% ') )')/'(01?,"' $,' #)"$& $,": (: 27µ)$) mobbing µ# $.' 50,!6//-!. $," )"$,%)0)*$.0--!µ,7. B$.' C>>+9), . 60#"') $(' Karatza et al (2016), . ,5,1) 6/-'# !# 841 µ6>. ',!.>#"$-*,7 50,!(5-*,7 56'$# ',!,*,µ#1(' $.: D#0-360#-): E$$-*4: $, 2013, *)-$6/0)<# &$- 30,2% $(' !"µµ#$#%&'$(' )')/'A0-!)' &$- 6%,"' "5,!$#1 *+5,-," #19,": mobbing $,": $#>#"$)1-,": 6 µ4'#: !5+'-), #'A 3,1% 9.>A'#- !"%'&$.$) $,"->+%-!$,' !# #;9,µ)9-)1) ;+!.. E*&µ) µ#/)>7$#0) 5,-!,!$+ )')360#- . 60#"') $(' F5)*6>>) *)- !"' (2013)

Page 10: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

[38] !""#$%&' (!)%'*%&' +#, $',#"!-+%&#, !(%,+#.#,

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"#$%&

20 !"# 30

30 !"# 40

40 !"# 50

50 !"# 60

60 $%& '("

'#(#$)*+*&

)*+,-./0&$1 23*+"4&$1

5%03&$1 23*+"4&$1

,-.+ .*+/ #01&12%&

3#& *456 /4.+"05*-6

6%0!7.& 8!+, 43*9+0%µ!(*/

:.( $%0!7.& 8!+, 43*9+0%µ!(*/

,-.+ .*+/ #01&12%& 3#& *456 #&*1476

;&<&$./µ!(*# =/(0*(&+0># :&./8/(0>#

:&./8/(0>#

;4&µ.-,0># ?'

;4&µ.-,0># @'

;&<&$./1µ.(*#

81)/#& .5/4"#$96 0:&330"µ&*#$96

0µ:0#1%&6

0 !"# 5

5 !"# 10

10 !"# 20

20 !"# 30

30 $%& '("

':%:0(4 ;&.#$</ .:45(</

20/7A* :;

20/7A* B;

20/7A* 2;

17,92 (6,20)

16,40 (6,49)

16,23 (5,07)

14,10 (3,21)

11,50 (6,36)

14,15(4,16)

18,88 (5,98)

16,33 (3,20)

13,73 (4,76)

16,00 (9,85)

14,75 (8,38)

18,60 (4,45)

17,00 (6,52)

21,24 (4,32)

17,26 (5,92)

19,73 (7,25)

14,95 (4,48)

15,21 (4,57)

11,50 (6,36)

12,90 (3,70)

14,24 (3,82)

18,43 (6,13)

H(4)=3,959b

p=,462

U(46,34)=409,5a

p=,000*

U(6,40)=65,5a

p=,075

H(4)=4,647b

p=,326

H(4)=6,846b

p=,144

H(2)=12,342b

p=,002*

24,23 (9,11)

20,60 (6,36)

21,37 (8,28)

19,40 (6,35)

15,50 (4,95)

19,37 (5,36)

23,79 (9,59)

23,67 (5,16)

18,70 (5,14)

18,00 (9,54)

23,00 (11,64)

23,40 (11,04)

20,20 (6,91)

26,24 (7,76)

22,26 (7,87)

24,27 (7,99)

20,68 (8,97)

20,21 (6,72)

15,50 (4,95)

17,50 (5,49)

19,94 (5,49)

23,26 (9,16)

H(4)=3,333b

p=,504

U(46,34)=596,5a

p=,071

U(6,40)=54,0a

p=,030*

H(4)=4,021b

p=,403

H(4)=4,150b

p=,386

H(2)=4,476b

p=,107

4,85 (2,19)

4,50 (1,79)

4,60 (1,95)

5,00 (1,76)

4,00 (1,41)

4,57 (1,70)

4,76 (2,15)

5,00 (1,79)

4,45 (1,68)

4,00 (1,73)

5,25 (3,30)

3,60 (0,89)

4,00 (2,24)

5,47 (2,10)

4,79 (2,04)

4,46 (2,07)

4,63 (1,95)

4,69 (1,81)

4,00 (1,41)

4,60 (2,07)

4,58 (1,63)

4,72 (2,08)

H(4)=,988b

p=,912

U(46,34)=754,5a

p=,783

U(6,40)=92,5a

p=,379

H(4)=5,152b

p=,272

H(4)=,224b

p=,994

H(2)=,140b

p=,932

H(4)=2,973b

p=,562

U(46,34)=524,5a

p=,012*

U(6,40)=62,0a

p=,059

H(4)=4,026b

p=,402

H(4)=4,538b

p=,338

H(2)=6,361b

p=,042*

47,00 (16,03)

41,50 (13,53)

42,20 (14,05)

38,50 (10,29)

31,00 (12,73)

38,09 (9,93)

47,44 (16,46)

45,0 (9,08)

36,86 (9,65)

38,00 (20,88)

43,00 (29,09)

45,60 (15,08)

41,20 (14,97)

52,94 (12,66)

44,32 (14,51)

48,45 (16,67)

40,26 (13,86)

40,10 (11,85)

31,00 (12,73)

35,00 (10,04)

38,87 (9,60)

46,41 (16,10)

!"µ#$%&". '( )(µ*+ #,-./012)3( %+ 4.'. (5.6.), a. Mann Withney U, b. Kruskal-Wallis H, * 7 &8&9*)(&" : " ;(3-1.1<1$"&" #$23( &"µ32)(,: &# #<$<#;1 0,05

!"#$%$& 4. '()*+ ($,$%-+,.*-.%/# -0# *1µµ2-2(3#-0# µ2 -+ 4$5µ6768"$ *-6 *9#676 %$. *-.& 1:6%7"µ$%2& -0# 22 2,0-;*2-0# -61 NAQ-R (NAQ-R 22)

=*4µ#$> 2&1&$*+1#.*#$>

Mobbing :45 .20*%?0*&# µ0 *+/ 013&.%&/Work-related

mobbing

@14.A:#$) mobbing/Personal mobbing

BAµ&*#$) mobbing/Physical forms

of mobbing

B5/4"#$) mobbing/NAQ Total

Test / Sig.Score Test / Sig. Test / Sig. Test / Sig.Score Score Score

C7"4

!"#$%&

'("%)*%

16,86 (5,86)

15,79 (5,33)

U(28,52)=660,5a

p=,495

22,61 (7,59)

20,52 (7,77)

U(28,52)=599,5a

p=,194

4,71 (1,46)

4,62 (2,10)

U(28,52)=628,0a

p=,299

U(28,52)=611,5a

p=,240

44,18 (13,45)

40,92 (14,01)

Page 11: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

!"#"$ 11 - !%&'"$ 2 [39]

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"# $%&'( )( 521 '")*+(#,$- )( (!,. /")"0"µ(12 ,*- 6*- 3.45. ," 2013, µ( ,* µ$6"7" ,"# 2#,"82920,*9&)µ":, 02& ;9<0( =,& 71% ,>' )#µµ(,(8=',>' $8(& ;&?)(& 0.!"&2 ),&%µ< mobbing.

@" %(%"'=- =,& ," )>µ2,&0= mobbing (µA2'1B(,2& )( µ&09=,(92 !")"),., )#µA>'(1 02& µ( ,&- !9?,(- (#-9>!2C0$- $9(#'(- )8(,&0. µ( ,&- µ"9A$- ,"# mobbing, =!>- * $9(#'2 ,>' Einarsen & Raknes (1997 2'2A"9. )," Zapf et al 2011), ):µA>'2 µ( ,*' "!"12 2,4% ,>' )#µµ(,(8=',>' 7*+?'(& =,& 7$86*0( )>µ2,&0< ;12 < ,"# Zapf (1999a 2'2A"9. )," Zapf et al 2011), ):µA>'2 µ( ,*' "!"12 * )>µ2,&0< (!&6(,&0=,*,2 (µA2'1B(,2& )," 3,6-9,1% ,>' !(9&!,?)(>', #!"%92µµ1B"',2- ," %(%"'=- =,& " (0A";&)µ=- ),*' (9%2)12 2!",(+(1 !9>,1),>- µ12 µ"9A< D#8"+"%&0<- !29. )>µ2,&0<- (!16()*-. E 2',1-),"&8* $9(#'2 ,>' Karatza et al (2016), )#µA>'(1 µ( ,* )#8'=,(9* (µA.'&)* 29'*,&0?' )#µ!(9&A"9?' !"# )8(,1B"',2& µ( ,*' 17&2 ,*' (9%2)12 (mobbing !"# )8(,1-B(,2& µ( ,*' (9%2)12), ('? "& µ$)"& =9"& ,*- ;26µ"+"%12- ,>' )#µµ(,(8=',>' ),&- 2',1),"&8(- 0+1µ20(- (µA2'1-B"',2& (+2A9?- µ&09=,(9"& 2!= ,*' !29":)2 $9(#'2, 02& !&" )#%0(09&µ$'2 %&2 ," mobbing !"# )8(,1B(,2& µ( ,*' (9%2)12 14,2 (@.F.=5,5), %&2 ," !9")>!&0= mobbing 19,3(±6,8) 02& %&2 ," )>µ2,&0= mobbing 4,4(±1,7).

G)"' 2A"9. ),*' (9%2)&20< )8$)* ,>' 6#µ.,>' µ( ,"#- 79.),(- 02& ,* 6$)* ,>' 792),?' ),*' &(929-812, 48,6% 2!= 2#,":- !"# 7*+?'"#' =,& $8"#' #!"-),(1 mobbing 2'2%'?9&)2' ,"#- 79.),(- >- !(+.,(-/2)6('(1-/A"&,*,$- 0+!, ," 42,9% >- )#'27$+A"#- ,"#-, ," 25,7% >- ,"' .µ()" !9"C),.µ('= ,"#-, ," 20,0% >- .++"#- !9"C),2µ$'"#-/7&(#6#',$- ),"' "9%2'&)µ=, ('? µ=+&- 5,7% >- #A&),2µ$'"#- ,"#-. E 6$)* ,"# 79.),* ),*' &(929812 7&2A$9(& 2'.+"%2 µ( ,* 8?92 ),*' "!"12 7&(H<86* * $9(#'2. F#,< * 7&2A"9. "A(1+(,2& ):µA>-'2 µ( ,"#- Zapf et al (2003) ),&- !"+&,&)µ&0$- 7&2A"9$- !"# (µA2'1B"#' "& 8?9(- µ(,2H: ,"#-. I),=)", '$(- $9(#'(- !"# (),&.B"#' )( &2,9"'")*+(#,&0= !9")>!&-0= 02,2%9.A"#' )( µ(%2+:,(92 !")"),. ,"#- 79.),(- >- !9"C),2µ$'"#-. 4&" )#%0(09&µ$'2, ),*' $9(#'2 ,*- J(192 (2014), >- !9"- ,*' (9%2)&20< )8$)* ,>' 6#µ.-,>' µ( ,"#- 79.),(- 2'2A$9(,2& =,& 55,9% ,>' 6#µ.,>' 7<+>)2' =,& $8"#' #!"),(1 mobbing 2!= ,"#- !9"C),2-µ$'"#- ,"#- 02& 50% 2!= )#'27$+A"#-. K,*' $9(#'2 ,>' Mc Mahon et al (2013), >- 79.),(- 2'2%'>91B"',2& )," µ(%2+:,(9" !")"),= (74,2%) "& !9"C),.µ('"& 02& "& 2'?-,(9"& 7&(#6#',$-, "& )#'.7(+A"& (38,2%), "& #A&),.µ('"& (13,5%) 02& "& !(+.,(-/A"&,*,$-/"&0"%$'(&(- (18,9%). F',1-),"&82, ),*' $9(#'2 ,>' Cevik et al (2012), !"# $%&'( )( 180 '")*+(#,$- ),*' @"#9012, * !+(&"D*A12 ,>' 6#µ.-,>' (58,9%) 2'2%'>91B(& ,"#- 79.),(- >- ,"#- .µ()"#- !9"C),.µ('"#-.

@2 (#9<µ2,2 ,*- !29":)2- $9(#'2- )#µA>'":' )," =,& "& !9"C),.µ('"& 02& "& )#'.7(+A"& (1'2& ,&- !(9&))=-

,(9(- A"9$- "& 79.),(- mobbing. G)"' 2A"9. )," 9=+" ,>' ,91,>', (1'2& )*µ2',&0= '2 2'2A(96(1 =,& * $9(#'2 %&2 ," mobbing 02& ,* ;12 ),"' ,"µ$2 !29"8<- #!*9()&-?' #%(12- H(01'*)( µ( ,"' (',"!&)µ= ,*- ;12&*- )#µ!(9&-A"9.- ,>' 2)6('?' !9"- ,"#- &2,9":- 02& '")*+(#,$-, 0#91>- )( D#8&2,9&0$- 0+&'&0$- 02& µ"'.7(- $0,20,>' !(9&),2,&0?' (Leather 2002). 5!1)*-, "& "9&)µ"1 ,>' 7&(-6'?' "9%2'&)µ?' (9%2)12- 02& #%(12-, =!>- ,"# 5#9>-!2C0": L9%2'&)µ": %&2 ,*' F)A.+(&2 02& ,*' 3%(12 ),*' 59%2)12 (EU-OSHA 2010), )#µ!(9&+2µ;.'"#' ,* ;12 02& !29('=8+*)* 2!= ,91,"#-, !.8. !(+.,(- 02& 2)6('(1-, (!&)*µ21'"',2-, >),=)", =,& ," mobbing (1'2& µ&2 µ"9A< D#8"+"%&0<-, 0#91>- ;12-, %(%"'=- !"# 2!2&,(1 !(92&,$-9> µ(+$,*.

G)"' 2A"9. ),&- 2!2',<)(&- )8(,&0. µ( ," A:+" ,>' 792),?', ," 44,8% 2!= 2#,":- !"# 7*+?'"#' =,& $8"#' #!"),(1 mobbing 2'2%'?9&)2' ,"#- 79.),(- >- .'79(-, ," 31% >- %#'210(- 02& ," 24,1% 02& 2!= ,2 7:" A:+2. @" 2!",$+()µ2 >- !9"- ," A:+" ,>' 792),?' )#µA>-'(1 µ( !"++$- $9(#'(-, "& "!"1(- %('&0. 7(18'"#' µ&2 #!(9(0!9")?!*)* ,>' 2'79?' µ(,2H: ,>' 792),?' (Zapf et al 2003). K,*' $9(#'2 ,*- J(192 (2014), >- !9"- ," A:+" ,>' 792),?', ," 83,8% 7*+?'(& =,& $8(& #!"),(1 mobbing 2!= %#'210(-, >),=)" * )#',9&!,&0< !+(&"D*-A12 ,"# 7(1%µ2,"- 2!",(+":',2' 2!= %#'210(-, %(%"'=- !"# 7(18'(& =,& ," 2!",$+()µ2 7(' µ!"9(1 '2 2!",(+$)(& 2)A2+$- )#µ!$92)µ2 %&2 ,* %('10(#)* ,"# A:+"# ,>' 792),?'.

K8(,&0. µ( ,&- 2!2',<)(&- 2'2A"9&0. µ( ,"' 29&6µ= ,>' 792),?', µ='" 18 2!= ,2 35 .,"µ2 !"# 7<+>)2' =,& $8"#' #!"),(1 0.!"&"# (17"#- mobbing ($),> 02& )!.-'&2) 7<+>)2' 02& ,"' 29&6µ= ,>' 792),?'. 4&" )#%0(09&-µ$'2, 33,3% 2!= 2#,":- 2'2%'?9&)2' !.'> 2!= ,$))(9&- 79.),(-, 27,8% 7:" 79.),(-, 16,7% ,$))(9&- 79.),(- 02& $'2' 79.),* 02& 5,6% ,9(&- 79.),(-. K,*' $9(#'2 ,*- J(1-92 (2014), 02,2%9.A(,2& " M.L. ,"# 29&6µ": ,>' 792),?' )( 2,3 (±1,1), ('? ),*' $9(#'2 ,>' Mc Mahon et al (2013), ," 50% ,>' 6#µ.,>' 2'2A$9(& =,& $8(& #!"),(1 mobbing 2!= $'2' µ(µ"'>µ$'" 79.),*, ('? ," #!=+"&!" 50% 2!= !(9&))=,(9"#- 79.),(-.

@" 2!",$+()µ2 ,*- µ* )#)8$,&)*- ,"# mobbing µ( ," A:+" 02& ,*' *+&012 ,>' 6#µ.,>' )#µA>'(1 µ( ,*' $9(#'2 ,*- J(192 (2014) 02& ,>' Kakoulakis et al (2015) !"# $7(&H2' =,& ," A:+" 02& * *+&012 7(' (!*9(.B"#' )*µ2',&0. ,*' (µA.'&)* ,"# A2&'"µ$'"#. I),=)", 2',1-),"&8* $9(#'2 ,>' Cevik et al (2012) ),*' @"#9012, $7(&H( ),2,&),&0. )*µ2',&0< )8$)* 2'.µ()2 ),*' *+&012 02& ,*' (µA.'&)* ,"# A2&'"µ$'"#, µ( ,"#- µ&09=,(9*- *+&012- '")*+(#,$- '2 7$8"',2& )#8'=,(92 mobbing.

E )#)8$,&)* ,"# mobbing µ( ,*' (&7&0=,*,2 ,>' )#µµ(,(8=',>', µ( ," &2,9&0= !9")>!&0= '2 (µA2'1B(& µ(%2+:,(9"#- µ$)"#- =9"#-, )#µA>'(1 µ( ,*' $9(#'2 ,>' Carter et al (2013), !"# $%&'( )( 2.950 µ$+* &2,9"-

Page 12: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

[40] !""#$%&' (!)%'*%&' +#, $',#"!-+%&#, !(%,+#.#,

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"#$%&'()*"+ ,-"#.,)*"+ #($ /-&(0!10. 2" 3&3"!45 4() ") &)6)*&'4µ&!") )0(-"1 &µ78!)#0! µ&30%+(&-0 ,"#"#(8 mobbing #'µ7.!&1 *0) µ& ($! &9!)*:5 &µ;<%&)05 <-&'!0 #($ /-&(0!10 ,"' 6)&=83&) " >0(-)*45 ?+%%"3"5 (General Medical Council 2013 & 2014) &($#1.5 #& 50.000 ,&-1,"' &*,0)6&'4µ&!"'5 )0(-"+5, #@&()*8 µ& (" mobbing ,"' 6<@"!(0) *0(8 ($ 6)8-*&)0 ($5 &*,016&'#:5 ("'5, 4,"' 701!&(0) 4(), (" 2014,(" 8% (.! &*,0)6&'4µ&!.! )0(-A! 6$%A!"'! 9+µ0(0 mobbing (µ& ($ µ<9"6" ("' 0'("@0-0-*($-)#µ"+), &!A (" 2013 " 0-)9µ45 0!<-@&(0) #(" 13,2%.

2" 3&3"!45 4() #($! ,0-"+#0 <-&'!0 &!(",1#9$*& !0 &µ70!1B"'! µ&30%+(&-"'5 µ<#"'5 4-"'5 ") ,('@)"+@") CD, 6)07.!&1 µ& ()5 <-&'!&5 (.! Cevik et al (2012) *0) (.! Karatza et al (2016) ,"' &µ70!1B"'! ("'5 !"#$%&'-(<5 µ& (" @0µ$%4(&-" &,1,&6" #,"'6A! !0 6<@"!(0) #'-@!4(&-0 mobbing. E ,0-0,8!. 0!(19&#$ 90 µ,"-"+#& !0 &=$3$9&1 *0) µ& (" 3&3"!45 4() (" µ&30%+(&-" ,"#"-#(4 (.! ,('@)"+@.! CD #(" 6&13µ0 µ05 :(0! ") )0(-"1, ") ","1") &µ70!1B"'! µ&30%+(&-0 ,"#"#(8 mobbing, ,0-0-#+-"!(05 <(#) (" #+!"%" (.! ,('@)"+@.! CD !0 &µ70!1-B"!(0) .5 9+µ0(0 mobbing.

!"#$%#$&µ%' ()* +#",-.*20 0,"(&%<#µ0(0 ($5 ,0-"+#05 <-&'!05, ,0-4() 61-

!"'! @-:#)µ&5 ,%$-"7"-1&5 #@&()*8 µ& ($! &µ78!)#$ ("' 70)!"µ<!"' ("' mobbing #(" )0(-"!"#$%&'()*4 ,-"#.-,)*4 ("' CFGHE, .#(4#" 6&! µ,"-"+! !0 3&!)*&'9"+! #(" #+!"%" ("' ,-"#.,)*"+, "+(& #("! ,%$9'#µ4 ("' )0-(-"!"#$%&'()*"+ ,-"#.,)*"+ #("! &%%06)*4 @A-". G)0 0'(4, ,-"(&1!&(0) $ &,<*(0#$ ($5 <-&'!05 #& µ&30%+(&-" 6&13µ0 &!(45 ("' !"#"*"µ&1"' : 8%%.! !"#"*"µ&1.! ($5 ,&-)7<-&)05 :/*0) ,0!&%%06)*8. D,),%<"!, ,-"(&1!&(0) $ &,<*(0#$ ($5 <-&'!05 *0) #(0 ',4%"),0 µ<%$ (.! ',$--&#)A! '3&105, 4,.5 (&@!"%43"'5 )0(-)*A! &-30#($-1-.!, 7'#)"9&-0,&'(<5, 6)0)("%43"'5, ("'5 0#*"+µ&!"'5 7")($(<5 !"#$%&'()*:5 *0) )0(-)*:5, :/*0) 6)")*$()*4 ,-"#.,)*4 ,"' ;-1#*&(0) #& &-30#)0*: #@<#$ µ& (" )0-(-"!"#$%&'()*4 ,-"#.,)*4. 2<%"5, µ&%%"!()*: <-&'!0 90 µ,"-"+#& !0 #'µ,&-)%8;&) &,),%<"! &,033&%µ0()*8 @0-0*($-)#()*8 (4,.5 $ &,033&%µ0()*: &="'9<!.#$)

*0) "-30!.#)0*8 @0-0*($-)#()*8 (4,.5 "-30!.#)0*: *"'%("+-0).

!"#$%&'!#'('?'µ,&-0#µ0()*8, ,0-4() $ <-&'!0 6&! µ,"-&1 !0

3&!)*&+#&) #("! ,%$9'#µ4 ("' )0(-"!"#$%&'()*"+ ,-"-#.,)*"+ ("' CFGHE, .#(4#", *0(03-87&) ,%$-"7"-1&5 ,"' 6&1@!"'! #$µ0!()*<5 &!6&1=&)5 3)0 ($! &µ78!)#$ ("' 70)!"µ<!"' ("' mobbing #& µ&38%" ;09µ4 #(0 µ<%$ ("' #& <!0 µ&38%" ,0!&,)#($µ)0*4 !"#"*"µ&1" *0) &7)#(8 ($! ,-"#"@: #($! 0!03*0)4($(0 ($5 &!$µ<-.#$5 *0) ($5 %:I$5 µ<(-.! ,-4%$I$5 *0) ,-"#(0#105 (.! &-30B"µ<-!.! ,"' &1!0) 9+µ0(0 mobbing.

/,-"$&0%#1 "#",-)(2-D.J.: &1@& ($! &'9+!$ #@&6)0#µ"+ ($5 µ&%<($5 *0)

#'µµ&(&1@& #($ #'33-07: ($5 µ&%<($5.H.K.: #'µµ&(&1@& #($ #'%%"3:, ($! 0!8%'#$ (.! 6&-

6"µ<!.!, ($! &-µ$!&10 (.! 0,"(&%&#µ8(.! *0) ($ #'3-3-07: ($5 µ&%<($5.

D.K.: #'µµ&(&1@& #($ #'%%"3:, ($! 0!8%'#$ (.! 6&-6"µ<!.!, ($! &-µ$!&10 (.! 0,"(&%&#µ8(.! *0) ($ #'3-3-07: ($5 µ&%<($5. L%") ") #'33-07&15 0=)"%43$#0! *-)-()*8 *0) &!<*-)!0! ($! ',";"%: ("' (&%)*"+ *&)µ<!"'.

%)*+,-./012E ,0-"+#0 µ&%<($ 6&! 90 µ,"-"+#& !0 "%"*%$-

-.9&1 @.-15 ($ #'µµ&("@: ("' )0(-"!"#$%&'()*"+ ,-"#.,)*"+ ("' CFGHE, ("'5 ","1"'5 90 9<%0µ& !0 &'@0-)#(:#"'µ& )6)0)(<-.5 *09A5 #'µµ&(&1@0! µ& ,-"9'µ10 #& µ10 <-&'!0 µ& &'01#9$(0 6&6"µ<!0. M0 9<%0µ&, &,1#$5, !0 &'@0-)#(:#"'µ& ($ N)"1*$#$ ($5 7$5 OCD K-:($5 *0) (" D,)#($µ"!)*4 ?'µ;"+%)" ("' CFGHE, ,"' @"-:3$#0! ($! <3*-)#: ("'5 3)0 ($ 6)&-=03.3: ($5 <-&'!05. 2<%"5, &*7-8B"'µ& ()5 &'@0-)-#(1&5 µ05 #("! *09$3$(: Staale Einarsen *0) #(0 µ<%$ ("' &-&'!$()*"+ *<!(-"' Bergen Bullying Research Group 3)0 ($ @"-:3$#$ ($5 86&)05 @-:#$5 ("' &-.($-µ0("%"31"' NAQ-R.

Page 13: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

!"#"$ 11 - !%&'"$ 2 [41]

!"!#$%&'(% !")*+'*

!"!#"$%&'("'

Carter M., Thompson N., Crampton P., Morrow F., Burford B., Gray C. & Illing J. (2013). Workplace bullying in the UK NHS: a questionnaire and interview study on prevalence, impact and barriers to reporting. BMJ Open 3.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013- 002628.

Cevik R., Tan M., Saritas S. & Altuntas S. (2012). Levels of mobbing perception among nurses in Eastern Turkey. International Nursing Review, 59 (3), 402-8.doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.00974.x.

Einarsen S., Hoel H. & Notelaers G. (2009). Measuring Exposure to Bullying and Harassment at Work: Validity, Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24-44.

Einarsen S., Hoel H., Zapf D. & Cooper C.L. (2011). The Concept of Bullying and Harassment at Work: The European Tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bulling and Harassment in the Workplace (2nd ed., pp. 17-43). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Galanaki E. & Papalexandris N. (2011). Exploring Workplace Bullying in Greece: Frequency of Occurrence and Handling of Measurement Issues, under the Light of Previous Research Findings at the International Level. European Academy of Management Conference: Management Culture in the 21st Century. ')*+,-./-+0 *12 https://ssrn.com/abstract=1831425 (10.11.2016).

General Medical Council (2013). National Training Survey 2013: undermining. ')*+,-./+0 *12 http://www.gmc-uk.org/NTS_2013_autumn_report_undermining.pdf_54275779.pdf (10.11.2016).

General Medical Council (2014). National Training Survey 2014: bullying and undermining. ')*+,-./+0 *12 http://www.gmc-uk.org/NTS_bullying_and_undermining_report_2014_FINAL.pdf_58648010.pdf (10.11.2016).

Kakoulakis C., Galanakis M., Bakoula-Tzoumaka C., Darvyri P., Chroussos G. & Darvyri C. (2015). Validation of the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ) in a Sample of Greek Teachers. Psychology, 6, 63-74. doi:10.4236/psych.2015.61007.

Karatza C., Zyga S., Tziaferi S. & Prezerakos P. (2016).Workplace bullying and general health status among the nursing staff of Greek public hospitals. Annals of General Psychiatry 15(7). doi:

10.1186/s12991-016-0097-z.Leather P. (2002). Workplace violence: Scope, definition and global

context. In C.L. Cooper & N. Swanson (Eds.), Workplace violence in the health sector: state of the art (pp. 3-18). International Council of Nurses. ')*+,-./+0 *12 http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/injury/en/WVstateart.pdf (10.11.2016)

Leymann H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165-184. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414853.

McMahon J., MacCurtain S., O’Sullivan M., Murphy C. & Turner T. (2013). A Report on the extent of bullying and negative workplace behaviors affecting Irish nurses. Dublin: Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation (INMO).

Nielsen M.B., Notelaers G. & Einarsen S. (2011). Measuring Exposure to Workplace Bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bulling and Harassment in the Workplace (2nd ed., pp. 149-174). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Trust Scientific Advisory Committee (2002). Assessing Health Status and Quality-of-Life Instruments: Attributes and Review Criteria. Quality of Life Research 11(3), 193-205.

Zapf D., Einarsen S., Hoel H. & Vartia M. (2003).Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In Einarsen S., Hoel H., Zapf D., Cooper C. (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp.103-126). London: Taylor.

Zapf D., Escartin J., Einarsen S., Hoel H. & Vartia M. (2011).Empirical Findings on Prevalence and Risk Groups of Bullying in the Workplace. In Einarsen S., Hoel H., Zapf D., & Cooper C.L. (Eds.), Bulling and Harassment in the Workplace (2nd ed., pp. 75-108). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

31*+455* 6., %789+:; <. & 31=*>*),?)/ @. (2013). A 01?B=*C/ ,:; “C;)B=2µ:; mobbing” C,/) 01*9905µ*,7+- DE- ,E) F:C/50;,G). !""#$%&' ()*%+,%&' -#. /+0#")1-%&2. !3%0-2µ#. 6(2), 15-21.

H0?=* I. (2014). !&-4µ#0# -#. 35*+1045. -+1 01$,*'µ+1 mobbing 5$6-µ)05 0-+1. )3577)"µ5-4). 17)45. 3+1 )*768+$-5% 0-#$ 3*9-+:6;µ%5 <*+$-4,5 17)45. 0-#$ =>3*+ ('B/µ:C?0;,/ 30,*1,;>7*+- J7*,=7-K-), '):7+,2 6*)017C,-µ7: @L1=:;, #0;+EC?*.

Page 14: ∆ιερεύνηση του φαινοµένου mobbing στο προσωπικό του ...journal-ene.gr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/... · harassment στις γαλλόφωνες

[42] HELLENIC JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE

RESEARCH STUDY

ABSTRACTIntroduction: According to the international literature, workplace bullying (mobbing) is frequent in health services. In Greece, however, research and management policies are not yet sufficient.Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the phenomenon of mobbing in health professionals of University General Hospital of Heraklion (Pa.G.N.I.), Greece.Methods: A cross sectional quantitative empirical study was conducted on a sample of 80 nurses, nursing assistants and doctors (response rate 53.3%) in July-October 2016. Negative Acts Questionnaire - Revised was used for data collection and IBM SPSS Statistics V.23 for the statistical analysis.Results: The 65% of the sample were women, 57.5% were nurses and nursing assistants and 42.5% doctors. University graduates were the 48.8% of the participants, 38.8% graduates of applied universities and 12.5% of secondary nursing schools. Administrative positions were occupied by the 13% of the nurses and nursing assistants and 50% of doctors were interns. With the self-report approach, 41.3% of the participants were reported as victims of serious mobbing and 31.3% as victims of occasional mobbing. The self-labelling approach showed that 6.3% identified themselves as victims of serious mobbing and 37.6% as victims of occasional mobbing. Work-related mobbing was more commonly recognized. Perpetrators were also recognized mostly as men, doctors were identified as victims more than nurses and nursing assistants in relation to work-related mobbing (p<0.05). Head nurses were identified as victims more than nurses regarding personal mobbing (p<0.05), University graduates were identified as victims more than graduates of applied universities and of secondary school regarding work-related mobbing (p<0.05).Conclusions: The present study revealed the frequent occurrence of mobbing in health professionals. A phenomenon often observed in the literature for this population group. Further research is needed in a larger sample and other health professionals.

Keywords: health professionals, mobbing, workplace bullying

Exploring the phenomenon of mobbing in health professionals at the university general hospital

of Heraklion

Niki Katsounaki1, Elpida Kiaourtzi1, EftychiaManousaki2

1. Nurse2. Nurse, Intensive Care Unit, University General Hospital of Heraklion

Corresponding Author: Elpida KiaourtziE-mail: [email protected], Telephone Number: +306942868367

Submission Date: 20/05/2017

Citation: Katsounaki N., Kiaourtzi E., Manousaki E. (2018). Exploring the phenomenon of mobbing in health professional at the Uni-versity General Hospital of Heraklion. Hellenic Journal of Nursing Science 11(2): 29-42.