Upload
aubrie-floyd
View
222
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
• Advertising aims to create subjective image differences and hence product differentiation.
• Product differentiation is a tool to increase profitability by decreasing the elasticity of demand.
Advertising plays a key role in the development of the market strategy
• Advertising allows firms to provide information directly to consumers.
• It helps firms to create or increase demand for their products.
• It allows firms to build a “brand image”.• It allows firms to differentiate their products.
Types of Advertising
• We distinguish between informal and persuasive adveritising.
• Informational (or informative) adveritisng is designed to provide truthful information about price,location or quality. (Does it?)
• Empricial evidence suggest that advertising about price (price advertising) results in lower prices.
• Do you think that advertising works? Does it change consumer behaviour?
• As an example: Apple Advertising may help manufacturers take advantage of economies of scale in production and distribution.
• Advertising is argued to improve quality. Since manufacturers build a brand image via advertising they try to live up to this image and increase the quality of production.
• Advertising may be seen as a commitment.• In real life we always face imperfect information.
Informative advertising increases market demand as more consumers become aware of the product.
• Informative advertising allows firms to increase demand but at the same time demand becomes more elastic. (Why?)
Persuasive Advertising
• In the real world advertising is more persuasive rather than informational.
• The main focus of advertising is to build brand loyalty. • Persuasive advertising is designed to influence
consumer tastes over a particular product.• Persuasive advertising creates/increases market power
because it is designed to persuade consumers that there is no/little substitues to their products.
• Moreover, brand loyalty is an important tool for an incumbent firm to set-up entry barriers.
• Informative advertising decreases market power/prices/profits.
• Persuasive advertising increases market power/prices/profits.
• So in a social welfare manner persuasive advertising decreases social welfare whereas informative advertising increases it. (Really?)
Cost of advertising (2009 US data-millions of dollars)
Rank Company Advertising exp.
1 Procter and Gamble 4189
2 Verizon 3020
3 AT&T 2797
4 General Motors 2215
5 Pfizer 2097
6 Johnson&Johnson 2061
7 Walt Disney 2004
8 Time Warner 1848
9 L’oreal 1834
10 Kraft Foods 1748
20 Nestle 1333
35 Pepsi 958
48 Coca-Cola 722
Advertising and Quality
• Phillip Nelson (1970,1974) developed a model on advertising.
• Consider two producers of toothpaste. Both toothpastes contain fluoride and have the Anerican Dental Association seal of approval. But the high-quality toothpaste tastes wonderful and the low quality toothpaste tastes horrible. The costs of production are assumed to be equal.
• Who has a higher incentive to advertise?
• Large advertising expenditures by high-quality toothpaste manufacturer signal consumers that it produces a high quality product. Because only high-quality producers advertise extensively. (Do you agree?)
Welfare Effects of Advertising
• Does advertising increase or decrease welfare?• Dixit-Norman model.• They analysed the welfare effects of
advertising in monopoly, oligopoly and monopolistic competition. Their conclusions were the same for all markets. We will only consider the monopoly model.
• From a social welfare perspective, all monopolists spend too much on advertising. Dixit and Norman showed that this result also holds for oligopoly and monopolistic competition.
• In this model advertising assumed to be purely persuasive, therefore had no social value.
• Some criticise the model arguing that informative advertising would have positive impact on social welfare. (Do you agree?)
• Another argument is that advertising may positively influence consumer’s utility by making them aware of the product. (Do you agree?)
Dorfman-Steiner Model
• This model is also constructed for monopoly.• In the model, only quantitiy is a function of
advertising. Price is independent of advertising.
• D-S condition states that the proportion of revenue a firm will spend on advertising is determined by the ratio of advertising elasticity to price elasticity.
• A monopolist will keep spending on advertising until the point it sets advertising to sales ratio equal to the ratio of the advertising-to-price elasticity.
• Since this is a monopoly model, market power is high and price elasticty is low so advertising expenditures will be high.
• In the D-S model profitability is linked to advertising expentiditures.
• The question is: Does a monopolist really needs advertising?