Upload
adam-park
View
221
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Demonstration of Amended Silicates™ for Mercury Control at Miami Fort Unit 6
Project SummarySpring, 2004
Jim Butz, Principal InvestigatorAmended Silicates, LLC
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Features of Sorbents for Mercury Control Low capital cost
Easy to retrofit
Control is simple
Minimal impact on plant operation
Hg removal rate controlled by sorbent injection ratio
Applicable to all coals, some more difficult (PRB, lignite)
Ongoing need for sorbent
Sorbent collected with fly ash
Two types of sorbent for mercury control – activated carbon and Amended Silicates™
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Amended Silicates™Advance Sorbent Solution
Amended Silicates™ are inexpensive, non-carbon substrates amended with mercury-binding sites
Silicate-based substrate, chemically similar to the native fly ash – no impact on sale of fly ash
Sites react with elemental and oxidized mercury species to bind the mercury to the sorbent
ADA initial development effort funded by DOE, EPA, CH2M Hill
Patent pending
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Amended Silicates™ Mercury Control
Pilot Plant Results
Note: Concentration units [µg/Nm3]
96.7%90.0%70.5%% Removal
0.250.462.04Post-Baghouse Hg
1.630.525.88Pre-Baghouse Hg
7.033.837.25Baseline Vapor
7.554.61Total Hg baseline
9.13.81.6
Sorbent Injection Rate (lb/MMACF)
© 2003, all rights reserved
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Amended Silicates™, LLC Joint Venture
– ADA Technologies - technology developer– CH2M Hill - utility market presence and scale-up to
commercial production– Amended Silicates, LLC was formed in April 2003
Objective – Provide advance sorbent technology as a low-cost
capital and O&M solution to meet utility customers’ need to control flue-gas mercury
Current Status– Amended Silicates, LLC will develop, manufacture,
market, and sell advanced sorbent on a commercial scale in the ~2007 timeframe.
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Project Objective
Primary: Demonstrate ability of Amended Silicates sorbent to remove mercury from flue gas in a commercial-scale installation. Conduct a 30-day continuous trial to show compatibility with plant equipment.
Secondary: Deliver commercial quantities of Amended Silicates sorbent for use in the demonstration.
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Project Team
Amended Silicates, LLC: prime contractor and administrator of first- and second- tier subcontracts
ADA Technologies, Inc.: sorbent developer and lead organization for field operations
CH2M Hill: lead organization for sorbent preparation and site engineering
Cinergy Power Generation Services, LLC: Provider of host site and cost-share partner
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Host Site Description
Cinergy Miami Fort station in North Bend, OH Unit 6: 175 MW(e) capacity Eastern bituminous coal (WV and KY sources) Equipped with 3 ESPs in series (2 back-to-
back, common box), each less than 200 SCA Mercury measurements to be made after first
ESP to be representative of small-ESP plant configuration
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Project Overview
Scheduled for completion in 16 months after contract signature
Scope: $1.76 million, including Amended Silicates sorbent costs of ~$600K
Phase I: Preparation Phase II: Demonstration Phase III: Analysis
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Phase I: Preparation
Project Planning– Detailed coordination with host site, project
team
Site Preparation and Sorbent Acquisition– CFD modeling of injection to optimize layout
Injection System Installation and Checkout
Mercury Monitoring System Installation and Checkout (UNDEERC)
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Phase II: Demonstration
Baseline Mercury Removal Characterization
Activated Carbon Trial– Use as basis for comparison
Amended Silicates Trial– Control Level (parametric) Investigation– Extended Injection Evaluation
Ontario Hydro Sampling for comparison with CEMS data and QA/QC evaluation
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Phase III: Analysis
QA/QC Planning and Execution– UNDEERC as QA/QC lead
Analysis of Data from Demonstration Trials– Establish project data base– ID trends and significant parameters in sorbent
performance Reporting
– Preparation of conference papers and project reports Project Management
– Establish project website for coordination among team members and means to share data
– Manage overall project activities with respect to scope, schedule, and budget
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Mercury Measurement
UNDEERC mercury continuous emissions monitors
Western Kentucky University Ontario-Hydro sampling
Coal and Fly ash samples to be acquired on a routine basis for mercury analysis
Fly ash samples acquired for evaluation in concrete testing by Boral Materials Technologies
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Milestones April 2004- project start Fall 2004- start installation at site Early 2005- deliver sorbents to site First Quarter of 2005: start of injection at host site Second Quarter 2005: finish testing, start
analyses Third Quarter 2005: Complete analyses, prepare
final report Fourth Quarter 2005: Continue planning for
dedicated sorbent manufacturing facility; identify additional test opportunities
“Advanced sorbent solutions for the environment.”© 2003, all rights reserved
Seeking Strategic Partners
Looking for utilities, others for technical and financial participation in project
Opportunity to monitor project on a first-hand basis
Review of data and input to test plans Confidential insight into sorbent
production and economics Favored position in scheduling of further
demonstrations