Upload
others
View
27
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advanced Quantum Mechanics
Scattering Theory
Rajdeep Sensarma
Ref : Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics
Taylor, Quantum Theory of Non-Relativistic Collisions
Landau and Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics
mailto:[email protected]
Recap of Previous Classes
Free particle with
momentum k
and energy E
Detector
Free par
ticle wit
h
momentu
m k’
and ene
rgy E
ẑ
(✓,�)
d⌦
S Matrix and decomposition of
scattered state in free particle
basis
S↵� = h�↵| (+)� (t ! 1)i Propagator in presence of scatterer
Probability conservation ----> Unitarity of S
GR = GR0 +GR0 V G
R0 +G
R0 V G
R0 V G
R0 + . . . = G
R0 +G
R0 V G
R
=G G0
+G0VG0
+G0VG0VG0
+ ....= +
Recap of Previous ClassesFree Prop.
with G0
Free Pro
p
with G0
T captures all the
effects of V incl. multiple scatterings
TT = V [1�G0V ]�1 = V + V G0V + V G0V G0V + . . . = V + V G0T
=+
V
+
VG0VG0V
+ ....
VG0VT
+=
(+)(~r) =1
(2⇡)3/2
ei~p·~r +
eipr
rf(~p0, ~p)
�
3D Scattered State
1D Scattered StateA eikx C eikx
B e-ikx D e-ikx
Recap of Previous ClassesBorn Approximation T = V + V G0V + V G0V G0V + ....
Born. Approx/
1st Born Approx.
2nd Born Approx.
3rd Born Approx.Validity: • Weak potentials
• High Energy of Incident particles
V (r) = V0 0 < r < a
= 0 r > aA) Square Well f(✓) = 2mV0
q2
sin(qa)
q� a cos(qa)
�
|f(θ)|2 /a2qa=0.1, 0.5,1.0, 1.5
2mV0a2=1
Differential Scattering Cross Section
goes down monotonically
0 p2
p0
0.05
0.1
0.15
B) Yukawa PotentialV (r) =
V0e��r
�r
f(✓) = �2mV0�
1
q2 + �2
θ0 p
2p
0
0.5
1.
|f(θ)|2 λ2
p/λ=0.1, 0.5,1.0, 1.5
2mV0/λ2=1
As λ ---> 0, with V0/λ fixed, the Yukawa potential goes over to the Coulomb potential.
In this limit, recover the Rutherford cross-section. d�
d⌦=
(2m)2(ZZ 0e2)2
16p4 sin4(✓/2)
q = |~p0 � ~p| = 2p sin ✓2
Recap of Previous ClassesExpansion in Partial waves
f(~p, ~p0) = �4⇡2
p
X
lm
Tl(E) Yml (p̂
0)Y m⇤l (p̂) f(~p,~p0) =
1X
l=0
(2l + 1)fl(p)Pl(cos ✓) θ
Tl(p) = �ei�l(p) sin �l(p)
⇡=
1
⇡
1
cot �l(p)� iT Matrix:
=
1
(2⇡)3/2
X
l
(2l + 1)Pl(cos ✓)
2ip
✓[1 + 2ipfl(p)]
eipr
r� e
�i(pr�l⇡)
r
◆ (+)(~r)
Scattered Wavefunction:
incoming spherical waveoutgoing spherical wave
Sl(p) = 1 + 2ipfl(p)S Matrix : |Sl(p)| = 1 ) Sl(p) = e2i�l(p)
phase shift in l channel
Conservation of Angular Momentum ——> Unitarity of Sl
Recap of Previous ClassesExpansion in Partial waves
f(~p, ~p0) = �4⇡2
p
X
lm
Tl(E) Yml (p̂
0)Y m⇤l (p̂) f(~p,~p0) =
1X
l=0
(2l + 1)fl(p)Pl(cos ✓) θ
Scattering Amplitude:
f(✓) =X
l
(2l + 1)Pl(cos ✓)ei�l(p) sin �l(p)
p
d�
d⌦= |f(✓)|2 =
X
ll0
(2l + 1)(2l0 + 1)
p2Pl(cos ✓)Pl0(cos ✓) sin �l(p) sin �l0(p)e
i[�l(p)��l0 (p)]
Differential Cross Section:
interference of different l channels
=4⇡
p2
X
l
(2l + 1) sin2 �l(p)�Total Cross Section:
interference washed out
Low Energy Scattering and few Partial WavesUse the expansion of a plane wave into spherical waves in 3D
Use orthonormality of Ylm
Y ml (✓, 0) =
r2l + 1
4⇡Pl(cos ✓)�m0Use the fact that k is along z and
Use for x
Low Energy Scattering and few Partial WavesLet us use the self-consistent eqn. for T matrix
Note that we want k, k’ to be small, but q sum is unrestricted
However, we have
So, Expand the series to show that each term has the form Vkq …… Vpk’
and
Now use the fact that for elastic scattering k=k’ and Tl(E)/k ~ Tkk’(E)
For low E 0, s-wave scattering
Calculating Phase Shifts in simple potentialsThe straight forward approach (works only in few selective cases) is to solve the Schrodinger equation with the potential, and obtain the phase shift from the asymptotic form of the wave-function far from the origin by comparing it with
(+)(r) =1
(2⇡)3/2
X
l
(2l + 1)Pl(cos ✓)
2ip
✓e2i�l(p)
eipr
r� e
�i(pr�l⇡)
r
◆
Spherically Symmetric Square Potential Well/Barrier:
V(r)
ra
V0
0
V(r)
r
a
V0
0
V(r)
r
a0
Potential Barrier Potential Well Hard Sphere
V (r) = V0 0 < r < a
= 0 r > a
•Scattering states behave like free particle far from the potential region.
•Since they have KE, we are looking for states with E>0
•The potential well can sustain bound states, but we are not interested in them (for now).
Use spherical co-ord
angular part given by Y0l
Spherically Symmetric Potential Well/Barrier: (+)(r, ✓) =
X
l
il(2l + 1)Rl(r)Pl(cos ✓) =X
l
il(2l + 1)1
rul(r)Pl(cos ✓)
r > a
Spherical Bessel Functions
Free particle solutions far from origin
Spherical Hankel Functions
h(1(2))l (pr) ⇠ ±e±i(pr�l⇡/2)
ipr
pr � 1
h(1(2))l (pr) = jl(pr)± inl(pr)Rl(r) = c1jl(pr) + c2nl(pr) = c
(1)h(1)l (pr) + c(2)h(2)l (pr)
Radial Equation: V (r) = V0 0 < r < a= 0 r > a
�d2ul(r)
dr2+
2mV (r)� p2 + l(l + 1)
r2
�ul(r) = 0
(+)(r) =1
(2⇡)3/2
X
l
(2l + 1)Pl(cos ✓)
2ip
✓e2i�l(p)
eipr
r� e
�i(pr�l⇡)
r
◆Comparing with
c(1)l =1
2e2i�l(p) c(2)l =
1
2Rl(r) = e
i�l[cos �ljl(pr)� sin �lnl(pr)]
Spherically Symmetric Potential Well/Barrier:
Spherical Bessel Functions Spherical Hankel Functions
Rl(r) = c1jl(pr) + c2nl(pr) = c(1)h(1)l (pr) + c
(2)h(2)l (pr)
(+)(r) =1
(2⇡)3/2
X
l
(2l + 1)Pl(cos ✓)
2ip
✓e2i�l(p)
eipr
r� e
�i(pr�l⇡)
r
◆Comparing with
c(1)l =1
2e2i�l(p) c(2)l =
1
2Rl(r) = e
i�l[cos �ljl(pr)� sin �lnl(pr)]
c(1) and c(2) are obtained from the continuity of the logarithmic derivative at r=a.
�l =
r
Rl
dRldr
�����r=a tan �l(p) =
paj0
l (pa)� �ljl(pa)pan
0l(pa)� �lnl(pa)
Note that till now we have not used the specific square-wave form
of the potential. This result is valid for any potential that vanishes at
a finite range
Spherically Symmetric Potential Well/Barrier:To find the parameter βl, we need the solution inside the potential region
A) Hard Sphere Potential
V(r)
ra0
Negative phase shift for
repulsive potential
Generically true for finite
potential barrier as well.
Indicates that the wave-fn
is pushed out
Boundary Condition : wfn. vanishes at r=a
�l ! 1�l =r
Rl
dRldr
�����r=a
tan �l(p) =jl(pa)
nl(pa)
tan �l(p) =paj
0
l (pa)� �ljl(pa)pan
0l(pa)� �lnl(pa)
�0(p) = �pas-wave phase shift
d�
d⌦ 0=
sin2 �0k
2' a2 for ka ⌧ 1
Spherically Symmetric Potential Well/Barrier:To find the parameter βl, we need the solution inside the potential region
B) Potential Well/ Barrier
V(r)
ra
V0
0
Potential Well
�l =qaj
0
l (qa)
jl(qa)tan �l(p) =
pj0
l (pa)� qj0
l (qa)jl(pa)/jl(qa)
pn0l(pa)� qj
0l (qa)nl(pa)/jl(qa)
Inside Soln.: regular at r=0 jl(qr)q2
2m= E � V0
V(r)
ra
V0
0
Potential
Barrier
�l(p) ⇠ p2l+1
�l =
r
Rl
dRldr
�����r=a
Square Potential Well: s-wave ScatteringConsider the l=0 channel in the low energy limit tan �l(p) ⇠ �pas
s-wave scattering length
For square well j0(x) =sinx
x
�l =qaj
0
l (qa)
jl(qa)Using �0 = qa cot(qa)� 1
2ma2V0
β0
-40 -20 0 20 40-15-10-505101520
-40 -20 0 20 400.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2ma2V0
as
Scattering
Length
as =a�0
1 + �0�0 = 4⇡a
2s
Scattering
Cross-Section
as diverges when
qa = (2n+1) π/2
f0(p) =1
p cot �0(p)� ip=
�11as
+ ip= � as
1 + ipas
Scattering
Amplitude
f0(0) = �as
f0 does not diverge when qa = (2n+1) π/2, f0 is -1/ ip at this point --- Unitary limit
s-wave Scattering LengthFor large r u0(r) ⇠ ei�0 sin(pr + �0) ⇠ ei�0 sin p(r � as) ⇠ ei�0p(r � as)
So as has the interpretation of the first point in space where the extrapolation of the far solution hits zero. Note that it is not a zero of the actual solution.
ra
U(r)
For purely repulsive potential
curvature is away from axis.
Scattering Length is always positive
�d2ul(r)
dr2+
2mV (r)� p2 + l(l + 1)
r2
�ul(r) = 0
Consider p=0, l=0u(r)
s-wave Scattering LengthFor large r u0(r) ⇠ ei�0 sin(pr + �0) ⇠ ei�0 sin p(r � as) ⇠ ei�0p(r � as)
So as has the interpretation of the first point in space where the extrapolation of the far solution hits zero. Note that it is not a zero of the actual solution.
a a
u (r) u (r) u (r)
U(r) U(r) U(r)
00
0
(b) (c)(a)
For attractive potential wells, the scattering length is initially negative
As we increase the well depth,the scattering length becomes more
and more negative till it reaches -∞
Beyond this point, the scattering length starts at + ∞ and keeps decreasing
This is the point where we have the first bound state in the system
V(r) V(r)V(r)
Effective Range Expansion H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 76, 38 (1949)
u2d2u1dr2
� u1d2u2dr2
= (p21 � p22)u1u2 u2du1dr
� u1du2dr
����R
0
= (p21 � p22)Z R
0dru1u2
What happens when we go to larger energies, aka what is the next term in f
f0(p) =1
p cot �0(p)� ip=
�11as
+ ip= � as
1 + ipas
�d2ul(r)
dr2+
2mV (r)� p2 + l(l + 1)
r2
�ul(r) = 0
d2u1dr2
+ [p21 � V (r)]u1(r) = 0d2u2dr2
+ [p22 � V (r)]u2(r) = 0
Schrodinger Eqn for 2 different momenta
Consider the asymptotic form of the solutions at large r
p(r) =sin[pr + �0(p)]
sin �0(p)
2d 1dr
� 1d 2dr
����R
0
= (p21 � p22)Z R
0dr 1 2
The asymptotic soln. also follows similar eqns as u
Subtract the equations for u and ψ,
p1 ! 0, p2 ! p p cot �0(p) = �1
as� p2
Z 1
0dr 0 p � u0up
Effective range of potential r0
p cot �0(p) =�1as
� r0p2 f0(p) =�1
1as
+ ip+ r0p2 Effective range expansion
Effective Range Expansion H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 76, 38 (1949)
2d 1dr
� u2du1dr
� 1d 2dr
+ u1du2dr
����R
0
= (p21 � p22)Z R
0dr 1 2 � u1u2
At r=R, LHS vanishes by continuity eqn.s.
At r=0, terms in LHS involving u vanish as u(0)=0.
Int extended to ∞ since the integrand vanishes outside
the range of potential 1
d 2dr
� 2d 1dr
����0
= (p21 � p22)Z 1
0dr 1 2 � u1u2
p2 cot �0(p2)� p1 cot �0(p1) = (p21 � p22)Z 1
0dr 1 2 � u1u2Using explicit form ψ at r=0,
' � 1as
� p2Z 1
0dr 20 � u20
Universality of low energy scatteringWe have seen that the low energy scattering from a potential can be characterized
by a few parameters
E.g. s-wave scattering can be parametrized by as, r0, etc.
Clearly this cannot depend on all the details of the shape of the potential
So we can have many different potentials at the microscopic level, whose low energy
scattering (say as, r0) are same.
E.g. can choose different V0 and a for a square well so that qa is fixed. Low energy
scattering is same for both. We can even get away with a simpler potential (say delta fn) provided we manage to get the correct scattering length
This is your first glimpse into the general phenomenon of universality:
Many systems which look different on a microscopic scale (i.e. different V) can show
same phenomena at low energy. This is at the heart of theoretical endeavours to
calculate properties of complicated systems.
For square well �0 = qa cot(qa)� 1 Scattering Length as =
a�01 + �0
q2
2m= E � V0