Upload
hathuan
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advance Learning on Section 44AE (Practical)
In this advance learning we shall learn various about practical aspects of the provisions of
section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Kumar is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages and
is owning 8 light goods vehicles. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE and
to declare income as per the presumptive taxation scheme. Can he adopt these provisions
even if he is an individual?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by every person (i.e., an individual, HUF,
firm, company, etc.). Thus, Mr. Kumar being an individual, if satisfies the other criteria
of the scheme, can adopt the provisions of section 44AE and can declare income on
presumptive basis.
Illustration
Kumar HUF whose Karta is Kumar is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing
of goods carriages and is owning 6 light good of vehicles. The HUF wants to adopt the
provisions of section 44AE and declare income as per the presumptive taxation scheme.
Can it adopt these provisions even if he is a HUF?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by every person (i.e., an individual, HUF,
firm, company, etc.). Thus Kumar HUF, being an HUF, if satisfies the other criteria of
the scheme, can adopt the provisions of section 44AE and can declare income on
presumptive basis.
Illustration
SM Enterprises a partnership firm whose partners are Soham and Mohan is engaged in
the business of plying, hiring or leasings goods carriages and is owning 9 light goods
vehicles. Soham is also running his proprietorship firm in which he carries on the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. In this case can the firm as well
Soham both adopt the provisions of section 44AE and declare income as per the
presumptive taxation scheme?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by every person (i.e., an individual, HUF,
firm, company, etc.). There is no restriction of partnership firm and partners both
adopting the provisions of section 44AE. Hence, in this case, both, i.e., SM Enterprise
and Soham can adopt the provisions of section 44AE if they satisfies the other criteria of
the scheme and can declare income on presumptive basis.
Scheme of computation of income
Illustration
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Mr. Ramesh engaged in the business of passenger transportation owned 7 mini buses
during the previous year 2012-13. Can he adopt the provisions of presumptive scheme of
section 44AE in respect of this business?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Ramesh is engaged
in the business of passanger transportation which is not eligible for the scheme of section
44AE and, hence, he cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Kaushal engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned
18 goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. He wants to adopt the provisions of
section 44AE in respect of this business. In this case what will be the income as per the
provisions of section 44AE?
**
The provisions of the presumptive taxation scheme can be adopted by an assessee who is
engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own
more than ten goods vehicles at any time during the previous year.
In this case Mr. Kaushal owns more than 10 goods vehicles and, hence, cannot adopt the
provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Raja engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 1
goods vehicle (small goods vehicle) during the previous year 2012-13. The vehicle
remained idle for a period of 4 months during the year. He wants to adopt the provisions
of section 44AE in respect of this business. In this case what will be the income as per the
provisions of section 44AE?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of heavy goods vehicles other than
heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof
during which the goods vehicle is owned by the assessee, during the previous year. In the
present case Mr. Raja owned the goods vehicle during the entire year and, hence, income
will be computed for the entire year (i.e., including the month in which the vehicle
remained idle). The computation will be as follows :
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 1
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 4,500
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 54,000
Illustration
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Miss. Kiran engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 4
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 5 heavy goods vehicles during the previous
year 2012-13. She wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this
business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) is owned by the assessee
during the previous year. In respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @
Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is owned by
the assessee during the previous year. In the present case Miss. Kiran owned 4 light
vehicles and 5 heavy goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income will be computed
as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 4
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 18,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from goods vehicles
(other than heavy goods vehicles) (A)
2,16,000
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of heavy goods vehicles 5
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 25,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from heavy goods
vehicles (B)
3,00,000
Total income from business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages as
per the provisions of section 44AE (A + B)
5,16,000
Illustration
Miss. Kiran engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 9
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 9 heavy goods vehicles during the previous
year 2012-13. She wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this
business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
In this case Miss Kiran owns more than 10 goods vehicles and, hence, she cannot adopt
the provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Miss. Komal engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 9
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 1 heavy goods vehicle during the previous year
2012-13. She wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this business. In
this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. The criteria is 10 goods vehicles in
total and not individually for heavy goods vehicles and other than heavy goods vehicles.
In this case assessee owns 10 goods vehicles in total and hence can opt for provisions of
section 44AE.
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) is owned by the assessee
during the previous year. In respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @
Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is owned by
the assessee during the previous year. In the present case, Miss. Komal owned 9 light
vehicles and 1 heavy goods vehicle during the year and, hence, income will be computed
as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle (other than heavy goods
vehicle)
4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 9
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 40,500
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from goods
vehicles (other than heavy goods vehicles) (A)
4,86,000
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of heavy goods vehicle 1
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 5,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from heavy
goods vehicles (B)
60,000
Total income from business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages as per the provisions of section 44AE (A + B)
5,46,000
Illustration
Miss. Kavita engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 9
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 1 heavy goods vehicle during the previous year
2012-13. During the month of May, 2012 she sold the heavy goods vehicle and purchased
light goods vehicle in the month of June, 2012. She wants to adopt the provisions of
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
section 44AE in respect of this business. In this case what will be the income as per the
provisions of section 44AE?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case, she sold one vehicle in
May and purchased another vehicle in June, thus, she did not own more 10 vehicles at
any time during the year, thus, she satisfied the criteria and she can adopt the provisions
of section 44AE.
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) is owned by the assessee
during the previous year. In respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @
Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is owned by
the assessee during the previous year. In this case, income will be computed as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 8
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 36,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from goods
vehicles (other than heavy goods vehicles) (A)
4,32,000
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of heavy goods vehicle 1
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 5,000
(×) No. of months in a year 2
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from heavy goods
vehicles (B)
10,000
Total (A + B) 4,42,000
(+) Income in respect of 1 vehicle which is purchased in June for 10
months @ Rs. 4,500 per month (C)
45,000
Total income from business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages as per the provisions of section 44AE (A + B+C)
4,87,000
Provisions relating to various allowances/disallowances
Illustration
Mr. Krunal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. He
owned 6 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared income as
per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000 per month,
he wants to claim further deduction on account of following items :
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Salary paid to office administration staff : Rs. 84,000.
Expenditure on account of insurance of goods vehicles Rs. 25,200
Depreciation on office building Rs. 1,84,000
Depreciation on goods vehicle Rs. 48,400.
Can he claim deduction on account of above expenditure?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. Thus, in this case Mr. Krunal cannot claim any further deduction on
account of any of the above discussed expenses from the net income computed as per the
provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Essem Enterprise is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages.
The firm owned 7 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared
income as per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000
per month, the firm wants to claim further deduction on account of following items :
Salary paid to office administration staff : Rs. 84,000.
Expenditure on account of insurance of goods vehicles Rs. 25,200
Depreciation on office building Rs. 1,84,000
Depreciation on goods vehicle Rs. 48,400.
Remuneration paid to partners Rs. 84,000.
Can the firm claim deduction on account of above expenditure?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. Thus, in this case the firm cannot claim any further deduction on
account of any of the above discussed expenses (except remuneration paid to partners)
from the net income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE.
In case of an assessee, being a partnership firm, from the net income computed as per the
provisions of section 44AE further deduction on account of remuneration and interest
paid to its partner within the limit specified under section 40(b) is allowed. Thus, in this
case the firm can claim further deduction on account of remuneration paid to its partners
within the limit specified under section 40(b).
Illustration
SM Enterprise is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. The
firm owned 4 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared
income as per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000
per month, the firm wants to claim further deduction on account of following items :
Depreciation on office building Rs. 3,84,000
Depreciation on goods vehicle Rs. 25,200.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Remuneration paid to partners Rs. 25,200.
Interest on capital to partners @ 12% amounting to Rs. 84,000
Can the firm claim deduction on account of above expenditure?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. Thus, in this case the firm cannot claim any further deduction on
account of any of the above discussed expenses (except remuneration paid to partners)
from the net income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE.
In case of an assessee, being a partnership firm, from the net income computed as per the
provisions of section 44AE further deduction on account of remuneration and interest
paid to its partner within the limit specified under section 40(b) is allowed. Thus, in this
case the firm can claim further deduction on account of remuneration and interest paid to
its partners within the limit specified under section 40(b).
Manner of computation of WDV of depreciable assets
Illustration
Mr. Anil is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. He
owned 6 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared income as
per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000 per month,
he wants to claim further deduction on account of depreciation on the goods vehicles
amounting to Rs. 84,000. Can he do so as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. Thus, in this case Mr. Anil cannot claim any further deduction on
account of depreciation amounting to Rs. 84,000 from the net income computed as per
the provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
SM Transport Corporation a partnership firm is engaged in the business of plying, hiring
or leasing goods carriages and owned 7 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year
2012-13 and declared income as per the provisions of section 44AE. The opening WDV
of the block of depreciable asset (machinery 15%) as on 1.4.2012 is Rs. 1,84,000. Since
the firm has opted for the provisions of section 44AE for the year 2012-13 it has not
claimed depreciation. In this case, if in the next year they do not opt for section 44AE in
next year, what will be the WDV on which the firm can claim depreciation?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the income computed as per the provisions
of section 44AE, further deduction on account of depreciation is not available. However,
the WDV of any asset used in the business covered under the scheme of section 44AE
shall be calculated as if depreciation as per section 32 is claimed and allowed. Thus, even
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
though no depreciation is claimed by the firm, yet for purpose of computation of the
WDV of the asset, depreciation will be deducted from the value of the block. The WDV
eligible for depreciation will be computed as follows :
Particulars Amount
Opening WDV as on 1.4.2012 1,84,000
(-) Depreciation for the year 2012-13 27,600
Closing WDV for the year 1,56,400
WDV eligible for depreciation for the year 2013-13 1,56,400
Illustration
Mr. Kaushal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages He
owned 8 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared income as
per the provisions of section 44AE. In this case will he be liable to maintain the books of
account in respect of aforesaid business?
**
An assessee who adopts the provisions of section 44AE is not required to maintain books
of account (applicable only for business covered by this section). However, it should be
noted that the relief is available only in respect of business covered by the provisions of
section 44AE and not in respect of any other business. Thus, if Mr. Kaushal owns any
other business, then in respect of such business the provisions of section 44AA in respect
of maintenance of books of account will apply.
Provisions relating to maintenance of books of account
Illustration
Mr. Jay is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. He owned
18 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and wants to declared income
as per the provisions of section 44AE. In this case will he be liable to maintain the books
of account in respect of aforesaid business?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, an assessee who adopts the provisions of section
44AE is not required to maintain books of account as per section 44AA (applicable only
for business covered by this section). The presumptive taxation scheme under these
provisions can be opted for by an assessee who is engaged in the business of plying,
hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten goods vehicles at any
time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Jay owns 18 goods vehicles and, thus, he
is not eligible for the provisions of section 44AE and, hence, the provisions of section
44AA relating to maintenance of books of account will apply to him and he will be liable
to maintain the books of account as specified under section 44AA.
Illustration
Mr. Kaushal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and
owned 8 goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. He wants to adopt the
provisions of section 44AE for the above business. Apart from the business of plying,
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
hiring or leasing goods carriages, he is also running a provision shop in which his net
profit is @ 3% of turnover. In this case will he be liable to maintain the books of account
in respect of aforesaid businesses?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, an assessee who adopts the provisions of section
44AE is not required to maintain books of account as per section 44AA (applicable only
for business covered by this section). It should be noted that the relief is available only in
respect of business covered by the provisions of section 44AE and not in respect of any
other business. Thus, in this case he will not be liable to maintain books of account in
respect of business covered under section 44AE, i.e., business of plying, hiring or leasing
goods carriages but in respect of agency business he will be liable to maintain books of
accounts as provided under section 44AA.
Declaration of lower income/Higher income
Illustration
Mr. Ronak is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and
owned 7 heavy goods vehicles and 2 light goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-
13. His actual income per goods vehicle per month is less than Rs. 5,000. In this case can
he declare income @ Rs. 4,500 per month per light goods vehicle and declare lower (i.e.,
lower than Rs. 5,000 per month) in respect of heavy goods vehicle?
**
The presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AE does not provide any option to declare
income under section 44AE in respect of few goods vehicles and to opt for normal
provisions of section for a few goods vehicles. Thus, in this case Mr. Ronak has no
option to select the vehicle in respect of which he wants to declare income under
provisions of section 44AE. In other words, if he wants to adopt the provisions of section
44AE then he has to adopt the same for all the vehicles owned by him.
However, if he does not adopt the provision of section 44AE, then he can declare income
from aforesaid business at a lower rate (i.e., at less than Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000). However,
in this case he has to maintain the books of account prescribed under section 44AA and
has to get the books of account audited.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
FAQs
1. To whom the provisions of the scheme of section 44AE apply? Explain with the
help of a few illustrations.
Following illustrations will explain the applicability of the provisions of the scheme of
section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Kumar is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and is
owning 8 light goods vehicles. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE and to
declare income as per the presumptive taxation scheme. Can he adopt these provisions
even if he is an individual?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by every person (i.e., an individual, HUF,
firm, company, etc.). Thus, Mr. Kumar, being an individual, if he satisfies the other
criteria of the scheme he can adopt the provisions of section 44AE and can declare
income on a presumptive basis.
Illustration
Kumar HUF whose Karta is Kumar is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing
goods carriages and is owning 6 light goods vehicles. The HUF wants to adopt the
provisions of section 44AE and to declare income as per the presumptive taxation
scheme. Can it adopt these provisions even if he is an individual?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by every person (i.e., an individual, HUF,
firm, company, etc.). Thus, Kumar HUF being an HUF if satisfies the other criteria of the
scheme can adopt the provisions of section 44AE and can declare income on a
presumptive basis.
Illustration
SM Enterprises a partnership firm whose partners are Soham and Mohan is engaged in
the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and is owning 9 light goods
vehicles. Soham is also running his proprietorship firm in which he carries on the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. In this case can the firm as well
Soham, both adopt the provisions of section 44AE and declare income as per the
presumptive taxation scheme?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by every person (i.e., an individual, HUF,
firm, company, etc.). There is no restriction of partnership firm and partners, both
adopting the provisions of section 44AE. Hence, in this case both, i.e., SM Enterprises
and Soham can adopt the provisions of section 44AE if they satisfy the other criteria of
the scheme and can declare income on a presumptive basis.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
2. What is the scheme of computation of income as per the provisions of section
44AE? Explain with the help of a few illustrations.
Following illustrations will explain the applicability of the provisions relating to the
computation of income as per the provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Ramesh engaged in the business of passenger transportation owned 7 mini buses
during the previous year 2012-13. Can he adopt the provisions of presumptive scheme of
section 44AE in respect of this business?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Ramesh is engaged
in the business of passanger transport which is not eligible for the scheme of section
44AE and, hence, he cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Kaushal engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned
18 goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. He wants to adopt the provisions of
section 44AE in respect of this business. In this case what will be the income as per the
provisions of section 44AE?
**
The provisions of the presumptive taxation scheme can be adopted by an assessee who is
engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own
more than ten goods vehicles at any time during the previous year.
In this case Mr. Kaushal owns more than 10 goods vehicles and, hence, cannot adopt the
provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Raja engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 1
goods vehicle (small goods vehicle) during the previous year 2012-13. The vehicle
remained idle for a period of 4 months during the year. He wants to adopt the provisions
of section 44AE in respect of this business. In this case what will be the income as per the
provisions of section 44AE?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of heavy goods vehicle other than
heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof
during which the goods vehicle is owned by the assessee during the previous year. In the
present case Mr. Raja owned the goods vehicles during the entire year and, hence,
income will be computed for the entire year (i.e., including the month in which the
vehicle remained idle). The computation will be as follows :
Particulars Rs.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Income per month per goods vehicle 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicle 1
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 4,500
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 54,000
Illustration
Miss. Kiran engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 4
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 5 heavy goods vehicles during the previous
year 2012-13. She wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this
business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) is owned by the assessee
during the previous year. In respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @
Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is owned by
the assessee during the previous year. In the present case Miss. Khushali owned 4 light
vehicles and 5 heavy goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income will be computed
as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle (other than heavy goods
vehicle)
4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 4
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 18,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from goods
vehicles (other than heavy goods vehicles) (A)
2,16,000
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of heavy goods vehicles 5
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 25,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from heavy
goods vehicles (B)
3,00,000
Total income from business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages as per the provisions of section 44AE (A + B)
5,16,000
Illustration
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Miss. Kiran engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 9
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 9 heavy goods vehicles during the previous
year 2012-13. She wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this
business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
In this case, Miss Kiran owned more than 10 goods vehicles and, hence, she cannot adopt
the provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Miss. Komal engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owns 9
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 1 heavy goods vehicles during the previous
year 2012-13. She wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this
business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. The criteria is 10 goods vehicles in
total and not individually for heavy goods vehicle and other than heavy goods vehicle.
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) is owned by the assessee
during the previous year. In respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @
Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is owned by
the assessee during the previous year. In the present case Miss. Komal owned 9 light
vehicles and 1 heavy goods vehicle during the year and, hence, income will be computed
as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle (other than heavy goods
vehicle)
4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 9
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 40,500
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from goods
vehicles (other than heavy goods vehicles) (A)
4,86,000
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of heavy goods vehicle 1
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 5,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from heavy
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
goods vehicles (B) 60,000
Total income from business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages as per the provisions of section 44AE (A + B)
5,46,000
Illustration
Miss. Kavita engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owns 9
goods vehicles (light goods vehicles) and 1 heavy goods vehicle during the previous year
2012-13. During the month of May, 2013 she sold the heavy goods vehicle and purchased
light goods vehicle in the month of June, 2013. She wants to adopt the provisions of
section 44AE in respect of this business. In this case what will be the income as per the
provisions of section 44AE?
**
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case, she sold one vehicle in
May and purchased another vehicle in June, thus, she did not own more 10 vehicles at
any time during the year, thus, she satisfied the criteria and she can adopt the provisions
of section 44AE.
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) is owned by the assessee
during the previous year. In respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @
Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is owned by
the assessee during the previous year. In this case income will be computed as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle (other than heavy goods vehicle) 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 8
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 36,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from goods vehicles
(other than heavy goods vehicles) (A)
4,32,000
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of heavy goods vehicle 1
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 5,000
(×) No. of months in a year 2
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE from heavy goods
vehicles (B)
10,000
Total (A + B) 4,42,000
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
(+) Income in respect of 1 vehicle which is purchased in June for 10
months @ Rs. 4,500 per month
45,000
Total income from business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages as
per the provisions of section 44AE (A + B)
4,87,000
3. What are the provisions relating to various allowances/disallowances under
section 44AE? Explain with the help of a few illustrations.
Following illustrations will explain the provisions relating to various
allowances/disallowances under the section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Krunal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. He
owned 6 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared income as
per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000 per month,
he wants to claim further deduction on account of following items :
Salary paid to office administration staff : Rs. 84,000.
Expenditure on account of insurance of goods vehicles Rs. 25,200
Depreciation on office building Rs. 1,84,000
Depreciation on goods vehicle Rs. 48,400.
Can he claim deduction on account of above expenditure?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. Thus, in this case Mr. Krunal cannot claim any further deduction on
account of any of the above discussed expenses from the net income computed as per the
provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
Essem Enterprise is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages.
The firm owned 7 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared
income as per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000
per month, the firm wants to claim further deduction on account of following items :
Salary paid to office administration staff : Rs. 84,000.
Expenditure on account of insurance of goods vehicles Rs. 25,200
Depreciation on office building Rs. 1,84,000
Depreciation on goods vehicle Rs. 48,400.
Remuneration paid to partners Rs. 84,000.
Can the firm claim deduction on account of above expenditure?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
from such income. Thus, in this case the firm cannot claim any further deduction on
account of any of the above discussed expenses (except remuneration paid to partners)
from the net income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE.
In case of an assessee, being a partnership firm, from the net income computed as per the
provisions of section 44AE further deduction on account of remuneration and interest
paid to its partner within the limit specified under section 40(b) is allowed. Thus, in this
case the firm can claim further deduction on account of remuneration paid to its partners
within the limit specified under section 40(b).
Illustration
SM Enterprise is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. The
firm owned 4 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared
income as per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000
per month, the firm wants to claim further deduction on account of following items :
Depreciation on office building Rs. 3,84,000
Depreciation on goods vehicle Rs. 25,200.
Remuneration paid to partners Rs. 25,200.
Interest on capital to partners @ 12% amounting to Rs. 84,000
Can the firm claim deduction on account of above expenditure?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. Thus, in this case the firm cannot claim any further deduction on
account of any of the above discussed expenses (except remuneration paid to partners)
from the net income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE.
In case of an assessee, being a partnership firm, from the net income computed as per the
provisions of section 44AE further deduction on account of remuneration and interest
paid to its partner within the limit specified under section 40(b) is allowed. Thus, in this
case the firm can claim further deduction on account of remuneration and interest paid to
its partners within the limit specified under section 40(b).
4. What are the provisions relating to computation of WDV of depreciable asset in
case of an assessee opting for the scheme of section 44AE? Explain with the help of a
few illustrations.
Following illustrations will explain the provisions relating to computation of WDV of
depreciable asset in case of an assessee opting for the scheme of section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Anil is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. He
owned 6 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared income as
per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000 per month,
he wants to claim further deduction on account of depreciation on the goods vehicles
amounting to Rs. 8,4000. Can he do so as per the provisions of section 44AE?
**
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. Thus, in this case Mr. Anil cannot claim any further deduction on
account of depreciation amounting to Rs. 84,000 from the net income computed as per
the provisions of section 44AE.
Illustration
SM Transport Corporation, a partnership firm, is engaged in the business of plying, hiring
or leasing goods carriages and owned 7 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year
2012-13 and declared income as per the provisions of section 44AE. The opening WDV
of the block of depreciable asset (machinery 15%) as on 1.4.2012 is Rs. 1,84,000. Since
the firm has opted for the provisions of section 44AE for the year 2012-13 it has not
claimed depreciation. In this case, if in the next year they do not opt for section 44AE,
what will be the WDV on which the firm can claim depreciation?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the income computed as per the provisions
of section 44AE, further deduction on account of depreciation is not available. However,
the WDV of any asset used in the business covered under the scheme of section 44AE
shall be calculated as if depreciation as per section 32 is claimed and allowed. Thus, even
though no depreciation is claimed by the firm, yet for purpose of computation of the
WDV of the asset depreciation will be deducted from the value of the block. The WDV
eligible for depreciation will be computed as follows :
Particulars Amount
Opening WDV as on 1.4.2012 1,84,000
(-) Depreciation for the year 2012-13 27,600
Closing WDV for the year 1,56,400
WDV eligible for depreciation for the year 2013-13 1,56,400
Illustration
Mr. Kaushal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages He
owned 8 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and declared income as
per the provisions of section 44AE. In this case will he be liable to maintain the books of
account in respect of aforesaid business?
**
An assessee who adopts the provisions of section 44AE, is not required to maintain books
of account as per section 44AA (applicable only for business covered by this section).
However, it should be noted that the relief is available only in respect of business covered
by the provisions of section 44AE and not in respect of any other business. Thus, if Mr.
Kaushal owns any other business, then in respect of such business the provisions of
section 44AA in respect of maintenance of books of account will apply.
5. What are the provisions relating to maintenance of books of account in case of an
assessee opting for the scheme of section 44AE? Explain with the help of a few
illustrations.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Following illustrations will explain the provisions relating to maintenance of books of
account in case of an assessee opting for the scheme of section 44AE
Illustration
Mr. Jay is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages He
owned 18 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and wants to declare
income as per the provisions of section 44AE. In this case will he be liable to maintain
the books of account in respect of aforesaid business?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, an assessee who adopts the provisions of section
44AE, is not required to maintain books of account as per section 44AA (applicable only
for business covered by this section). The presumptive taxation scheme under these
provisions can be opted by an assessee who is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or
leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten goods vehicles at any time
during the previous year. In this case, Mr. Jay owns 18 goods vehicles and, thus, he is not
eligible for the provisions of section 44AE and, hence, the provisions of section 44AA
relating to maintenance of books of account will apply to him and he will be liable to
maintain the books of account as specified under section 44AA.
Illustration
Mr. Kaushal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owns
8 goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. He wants to adopt the provisions of
section 44AE for the above business. Apart from the business of plying, hiring or leasing
goods carriages, he is also running a provision shop in which his net profit is @ 3% of
turnover. In this case will he be liable to maintain the books of account in respect of
aforesaid businesses?
**
As per the provisions of section 44AE, an assessee who adopts the provisions of section
44AE, is not required to maintain books of account as per section 44AA (applicable only
for business covered by this section). It should be noted that the relief is available only in
respect of business covered by the provisions of section 44AE and not in respect of any
other business. Thus, in this case the he will not be liable to maintain books of account in
respect of business covered under section 44AE, i.e., business of plying, hiring or leasing
goods carriages but in respect of agency business he will be liable to maintain books of
account as provided under section 44AA.
6. What are the provisions relating to declaration of lower income as compared to
the limit prescribed under the scheme of section 44AE? Explain with the help of an
illustration.
Following illustration will explain the provisions relating to declaration of lower/higher
income as compared to the limit prescribed under the scheme of section 44AE.
Illustration
Mr. Ronak is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and
owned 7 heavy goods vehicles and 2 light goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-
13. His actual income per goods vehicle per month is less than Rs. 5,000. In this case can
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
he declare income @ Rs. 4,500 per month per light goods vehicle and declare lower (i.e.,
lower than Rs. 5,000 per month) in respect of heavy goods vehicle?
**
The presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AE does not provide any option to declare
income under section 44AE in respect of a few goods vehicles and to opt for normal
provisions of section for a few goods vehicles. Thus in this case Mr. Ronak has no option
to select the vehicle in respect of which he wants to declare income under provisions of
section 44AE. In other words, if he wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE then he
has to adopt the same for all the vehicles owned by him.
However, if he does not adopt the provision of section 44AE, then he can declare income
from aforesaid business at a lower rate (i.e., at less than Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000). However,
in this case he has to maintain the books of account prescribed under section 44AA and
has to get them audited.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
MCQ
Q1. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme applicable to an
assessee engaged in the business of passenger transportation are given in section
________?
(a) 44AE
(b) 44AB
(c) 44AD
(d) No such provisions exist for an assessee engaged in the business of passenger
transportation
Correct answer (d)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme applicable to an assessee engaged
in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages are given in section 44AE.
These provisions are not applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of passenger
transportation.
Thus, option (d) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (d) is the correct option since it gives the correct
section provisions. All the other options, viz., options (a), (b) and (c) giving incorrect
sections/provision are not correct.
Q2. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of ___________
(a) Plying goods carriages
(b) Hiring goods carriages
(c) Leasing goods carriages
(d) Plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages
Correct answer (d)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under section 44AE
are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages.
Thus, option (d) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (d) is the correct option since it gives the correct
business. All the other options, viz., options (a), (b) and (d) giving incorrect business are
not correct.
Q3. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
or leasing goods carriage only if the income from the goods carriage per month is
below Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000 as the case may be.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under section 44AE
are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriage. There is no such condition that the provisions can be adopted only if the income
from the goods carriage per month is below Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000 as the case may be.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q4. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring
or leasing of carriages if the assessee does not own more than ____ goods vehicles at
any time during the previous year.
(a) 5 (b) 10
(c) 15 (d) 20
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under section 44AE
are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing carriages
if the assessee does not own more than 10 goods vehicles at any time during the previous
year.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
number of vehicles. All the other options, viz., options (a), (c) and (d) giving incorrect
number of vehicles are not correct.
Q5. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring
or leasing of carriages if the assessee does not own more than 10 ____ at any time
during the previous year. (Options c and d are same?)
(a) Heavy goods vehicles
(b) Goods vehicles
(c) Goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicles
(d) Passenger vehicles
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under section 44AE
are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of
carriages if the assessee does not own more than 10 goods vehicles at any time during the
previous year.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. All the other options, viz., options (a), (c) and (d) giving incorrect provisions
are not correct.
Q6. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring
or leasing of carriages if the assessee does not own more than 10 heavy goods
vehicles and not more than 10 light goods vehicles at any time during the previous
year.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under section 44AE
are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing carriage
if the assessee does not own more than 10 goods vehicles (heavy or other than heavy
goods vehicles) at any time during the previous year. There is no individual criteria of 10
goods vehicles for heavy and 10 for light vehicles.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q7. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring
or leasing carriages if the assessee does not own more than 10 passenger vehicles
(heavy or other than heavy) at any time during the previous year.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under section 44AE
are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of
carriages if the assessee does not own more than 10 goods vehicles (heavy or other than
heavy goods vehicles) at any time during the previous year. The provisions are not
applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of passenger transportation.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Q8. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring
or leasing of carriages if the assessee does not own more than 10 heavy goods
vehicles and 10 passenger vehicles at any time during the previous year.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under section 44AE
are applicable to an assessee engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of
carriages if the assessee does not own more than 10 goods vehicles (heavy or other than
heavy) at any time during the previous year. These provisions are not applicable to an
assessee engaged in the business of passenger transportation.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q9. The provisions relating to presumptive taxation scheme prescribed under
section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee engaged in the business of retail trade
whose income from such trade does not exceed Rs. 5,500 per month from heavy
retail business and Rs. 4,500 per month for other than heavy retail business.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
An assessee engaged in the business of retail trade cannot adopt the provisions of section
44AE. These provisions can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the business of
plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q10. Mr. Kumar engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages
owned 7 goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and 2 passenger vehicles.
Can he adopt the provisions of presumptive scheme of section 44AE in respect of
these businesses?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case, Mr. Kumar owned 7
goods vehicles during the year. Thus, he can adopt the provisions of section 44AE for his
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
goods carriage business but he cannot adopt the provisions of section44AE for the
passenger transportation business.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (a) giving incorrect provision is not correct.
Q11. Mr. Krunal engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods
carriages owned 11 goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and 7 passenger
transportation vehicles. Can he adopt the provisions of presumptive scheme of
section 44AE in respect of these businesses?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Krunal owns only 11
goods vehicles during the year. Thus, he does not satisfy both the criteria of the scheme
and, hence, he cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE for his business of plying,
hiring or leasing of goods carriages. As regards the business of passenger transportation
business, the provisions of section 44AE will not apply and, hence, he cannot adopt these
provisions for his passenger transportation business.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (b) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q12. Essem Transport Corporation (a partnership firm) of Soham and Mohan
engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages owned 6 goods
vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. The partners also carry their own
individual business of passenger transportation. Can the firm adopt the provisions
of presumptive scheme of section 44AE in respect of this business?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. These provisions can be adopted by
a partnership firm too. In this case the firm owned only 9 vehicles during the year. Thus,
it satisfied both the criteria of the scheme and, hence, the firm can adopt the provisions of
section 44AE for its business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages. There is no
such criteria that a firm cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE if the partners are
engaged in the business of passenger transportation.
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (b) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Q13. Krunal Transport Corporation owned by Krunal HUF engaged in the business
of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages owned 7 goods vehicles during the
previous year 2012-13. Krunal is the karta of the HUF and he is also running a
proprietorship business of goods carriages in which he owns 12 goods vehicles. Can
the HUF adopt the provisions of presumptive scheme of section 44AE in respect of
this business?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. These provisions can be adopted by
a HUF too. In this case the HUF owned only 9 vehicles during the year, thus, it satisfied
both the criteria of the scheme and, hence, the HUF can adopt the provisions of section
44AE for its business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages. There is no
restriction that a HUF cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE if the karta is engaged
in the same business and owns more than 10 goods vehicles in that business.
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (b) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q14. SM Transport Corporation (a partnership firm) engaged in the business of
plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages owned 6 goods vehicles during the
previous year 2012-13. In the month of April, 2013 it purchased 3 passenger
vehicles. Can the firm adopt the provisions of presumptive scheme of section 44AE
in respect of goods transport business?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. These provisions can be adopted by
a partnership firm too. In this case, during the year 2012-13, the firm owned only 9 goods
vehicles and 3 vehicles purchased in April, 2013, hence, for the previous year 2012-13 it
satisfied both the criteria of the scheme and, thus, the firm can adopt the provisions of
section 44AE for its business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages.
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (b) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q15. Kumar Transport Corporation owned by Kumar HUF engaged in the business
of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages owned 15 goods vehicles during the
previous year 2012-13. The karta of the HUF is of the opinion that the HUF can
adopt the provisions of section 44AE because in case of HUF the limit prescribed
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
under section 44AE is 20 goods vehicles. Can the HUF adopt the provisions of
presumptive scheme of section 44AE in respect of this business?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. The limit of 10 goods vehicles is
applicable in respect of all assessees, viz., individual, HUF, Firm, etc. In this case the
HUF owned 15 vehicles during the year, thus, it did not satisfy the criteria of not owning
more than 10 goods vehicles and, hence, the provisions cannot be adopted in respect of
aforesaid business.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (a) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q16. In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE,
income will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate of Rs.
3,500/Rs. 3,000 per month.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE, income
will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is Rs. 5,000 per
month or part thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part
thereof in respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q17. In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE,
income will be computed on an estimated basis at a prescribed rate. The rate is Rs.
5,000 per month in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month in
respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. Part of the month is to be
ignored only if the assessee produces the proof of part ownership.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE, income
will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is Rs. 5,000 per
month or part thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part
thereof in respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. The above rates are
applicable for the month or part of the month as well; the fact remains same even if the
assessee produces the proof of partial ownership.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q18. In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE,
income will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is
Rs. 4,500 per month in respect of heavy goods vehicle and 4,000 per month in
respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. If the assessee owned a
goods vehicle for a period of 11 months and 4 days then income will be computed by
only considering 11 months.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE, income
will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is Rs. 5,000 per
month or part thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part
thereof in respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. Thus, part of month
will be taken as full month and 11 month and 4 days will be considered as 12 months.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q19. In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE,
income will be computed on an estimated basis @ Rs. 5,000 per month or part
thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof in
respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. In respect of medium goods
vehicle income will be computed @ Rs. 4,000 per month or part of the month.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE, income
will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is Rs. 5,000 per
month or part thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part
thereof in respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. There is no separate
rate for medium goods vehicle. The rate of Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof will apply
to medium goods vehicle as will as light goods vehicle.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q20. As per the presumptive taxation scheme of section 44AE, in case of heavy
goods vehicle income will be computed @ Rs. 5,000 per half year.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE, income
will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is Rs. 5,000 per
month or part thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part
thereof in respect of goods vehicle other than heavy. The rates are per month and not per
half year.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q21. Mr. Kumar owned 1 heavy goods vehicle during the year 2012-13. If he adopts
the provisions of 44AE then his income as per the provisions of section 44AE from
this business will come to Rs. 60,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE, income
will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is Rs. 5,000 per
month or part thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part
thereof in respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. In this case he owns
heavy goods vehicle and, hence, income will be computed @ Rs. 5,000 per month,
annual income will amount to Rs. 60,000
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q22. Mr. Kapil owned 1 heavy passenger vehicle during the year 2012-13. If he
adopts the provisions of 44AE then his income as per the provisions of section 44AE
from this business will come to Rs. 60,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
The provisions of section 44AE cannot be adopted by an assessee engaged in the business
of passenger transportation.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q23. Kumar HUF owned 1 light goods vehicle during the year 2012-13. If it adopts
the provisions of 44AE then its income as per the provisions of section 44AE from
this business will come to Rs. 60,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
In case of an assessee who is willing to adopt the provisions of section 44AE, income
will be computed on an estimated basis at the prescribed rate. The rate is Rs. 5,000 per
month or part thereof in respect of heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 4,500 per month or part
thereof in respect of goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle. In this case it owns
light goods vehicle and, hence, income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month; annual
income will amount to Rs. 54,000.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q24. Mr. Khush engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods
carriages owned 8 goods vehicles (heavy goods vehicles) during the previous year
2012-13. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this
business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
(a) Rs. 4,80,000
(b) Rs. 8,40,000
(c) Rs. 4,32,000
(d) Rs. 5,23,000
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be
computed @ Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is
owned by the assessee, during the previous year. In the present case Mr. Khush owned 8
heavy goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income will be computed as follows :
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of goods vehicles 8
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 40,000
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 4,80,000
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
amount of income. All the other options, viz., options (b), (c) and (d) giving incorrect
amount of income are not correct.
Q25. SM Transport Company engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of
goods carriages owned 9 goods vehicles (heavy goods vehicles) during the previous
year 2012-13. The firm wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of
this business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section
44AE?
(a) Rs. 4,50,000
(b) Rs. 5,40,000
(c) Rs. 4,86,000
(d) Rs. 4,68,000
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be
computed @ Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the heavy goods vehicle is
owned by the assessee in the previous year. In the present case the firm owned 9 heavy
goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income will be computed as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per heavy goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of goods vehicles 9
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 45,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 5,40,000
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer : Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the
correct amount of income. All the other options, viz., options (a), (c) and (d) giving
incorrect amount of income are not correct.
Q26. Mr. Raghu engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages
owned 7 goods vehicles (other than heavy goods vehicles) during the previous year
2012-13. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE in respect of this
business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions of section 44AE?
(a) Rs. 3,78,000
(b) Rs. 3,87,000
(c) Rs. 4,20,000
(d) Rs. 2,40,000
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle is owned by the assessee, during the previous year. In the
present case Mr. Raghu owned 7 goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income will
be computed as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 7
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 31,500
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 3,78,000
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
amount of income. All the other options, viz., options (b), (c) and (d) giving incorrect
amount of income are not correct.
Q27. Essem Transport Company engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing
of goods carriages owned 6 goods vehicles (other than heavy goods vehicles) during
the previous year 2012-13. The firm wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE
in respect of this business. In this case what will be the income as per the provisions
of section 44AE?
(a) Rs. 3,42,000
(b) Rs. 3,60,000
(c) Rs. 6,30,000
(d) Rs. 3,24,000
Correct answer (d)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle is owned by the assessee, during the previous year. In the
present case the firm owned 6 goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income will be
computed as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 6
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 27,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 3,24,000
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Thus, option (d) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (d) is the correct option since it gives the correct
amount of income. All the other options, viz., options (a), (b) and (c) giving incorrect
amount of income are not correct.
Q28. For the purpose of section 44AE, the expressions "goods carriage” and "heavy
goods vehicle” shall have the meanings, respectively, assigned to them in the
Income-tax Act.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
For the purpose of section 44AE, the expressions "goods carriage” and "heavy goods
vehicle” shall have the meanings, respectively, assigned to them in section 2 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 and not in the Income-tax Act.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q29. AB Transport Corporation, a partnership firm engaged in transportation
business owned 6 heavy goods vehicle during the year 2012-13. The firm paid
remuneration to its partner of Rs. 1,00,000 for the year. In this case taxable income
of the firm from the business as per the provisions of section 44AE will come to Rs.
2,24,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of goods vehicle (other than heavy
goods vehicle) income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part thereof during
which the goods vehicle is owned by the assessee, during the previous year. From the net
income computed as above, assessee, being a partnership firm, can claim further
deduction of remuneration and interest paid to its partners within the limit specified under
section 40(b).
In the present case the firm owned 6 goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income
will be computed as follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle 4,500
(×) No. of goods vehicles 6
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 27,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 3,24,000
(-) Remuneration paid to partners (1,00,000)
Income from business 2,24,000
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q30. AB Transport Corporation owned by AB HUF, engaged in transportation
business owned 8 heavy goods vehicle during the year 2012-13. The HUF paid
remuneration to its karta of Rs. 1,00,000 for the year. In this case taxable income of
the HUF from the business as per the provisions of section 44AE will come to Rs.
2,24,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, in respect of heavy goods vehicle income will be
computed @ Rs. 5,000 per month or part thereof during which the goods vehicle is
owned by the assessee, during the previous year. From the net income computed as
above, assessee, being a partnership firm, can claim further deduction of remuneration
and interest paid to its partners within the limit specified under section 40(b). This
deduction is available only to a firm and not to any other assessee. In the present case the
firm owned 8 goods vehicles during the year and, hence, income will be computed as
follows:
Particulars Rs.
Income per month per goods vehicle 5,000
(×) No. of goods vehicle 8
Monthly income as per the provisions of section 44AE 40,000
(×) No. of months in a year 12
Total income as per the provisions of section 44AE 4,80,000
(-) Remuneration paid to partners (not applicable)
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q31. Mr. Sunil engaged in the business of goods transportation owned 4 goods
vehicles unladen weight of which exceeded 12,000 kilograms. In this case, if he
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
adopts the provisions of section 44AE then income will be computed @ Rs. 5,000 per
month or part of the month per goods vehicle.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
For the purpose of section 44AE, "heavy goods vehicle" means any goods carriage the
gross weight of which or a tractor or a road-roller the unladen weight of which exceeds
12,000 kilograms. In case of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @ Rs. 5,000
per month or part of the month per goods vehicle.
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q32. For the purpose of section 44AE, any goods carriage the gross vehicle weight of
which, or a tractor or a road-roller the unladen weight of which, exceeds 12,000
kilograms will be treated as heavy goods vehicle and income will be computed @ Rs.
4,500 per month.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
For the purpose of section 44AE, "heavy goods vehicle" means any goods carriage the
gross weight of which, or a tractor or a road-roller the unladen weight of which exceeds
12,000 kilograms. In case of heavy goods vehicle income will be computed @ Rs. 5,000
per month or part of the month per goods vehicle.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q33. For the purpose of section 44AE any goods carriage the gross vehicle weight of
which, or a tractor or a road-roller the unladen weight of which does exceed 12,000
kilograms will be treated as goods vehicle other than heavy goods vehicle and
income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
For the purpose of section 44AE, "heavy goods vehicle" means any goods carriage the
gross weight of which, or a tractor or a road-roller the unladen weight of which exceeds
12,000 kilograms. In case of goods vehicle other than heavy, i.e., unladen weight less
than 12,000 kilograms of income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per month or part of the
month per goods vehicle.
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
nature of the vehicle, the other option, viz., option (b) giving incorrect nature of the
vehicle is not correct.
Q34. On 25th
April, 2013, Mr. Kapoor started business of hiring of goods vehicle and
purchased 1 light goods vehicle on the same day. The vehicle was purchased on hire
purchase system and entire consideration had be paid in 5 years. In this case income
of Mr. Kapoor as per the provisions of section 44AE will come to Rs. 54,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
For the purpose of section 44AE, an assessee, who is in possession of a goods carriage,
whether taken on hire purchase or on installments and for which the whole or part of the
amount payable is still due, shall be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage. In
this case the vehicle is light goods vehicle and, hence, income will be computed @ Rs.
4,500 per month. Thus, annual income will come to Rs. 54,000.
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q35. On 25th
May, 2013, Mr. Anil started business of hiring of goods vehicles and
purchased 2 light goods vehicles on the same day. The vehicles were purchased on
installment system and entire consideration had to be paid in 5 years. In this case
income of Mr. Sunil as per the provisions of section 44AE will come to Rs. 1,08,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
For the purpose of section 44AE, an assessee, who is in possession of a goods carriage,
whether taken on hire purchase or on installments and for which the whole or part of the
amount payable is still due, shall be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage. In
this case the vehicle is light goods vehicle and, hence, income will be computed @ Rs.
4,500 per month. The vehicles are purchased in May, 2013 and, hence, income will be
computed for 11 months. Thus, annual income will come to Rs. 99,000.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q36. On 25th
June, 2013, Mr. Sunil started business of hiring goods vehicle, and
purchased 2 light goods vehicles on the same day. The vehicles were purchased on
credit and the consideration had to be paid in 36 monthly installments. In this case
income of Mr. Sunil as per the provisions of section 44AE will come to Rs. 1,62,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
For the purpose of section 44AE, an assessee, who is in possession of a goods carriage,
whether taken on hire purchase or on installments and for which the whole or part of the
amount payable is still due, shall be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage. In
this case the vehicle is light goods vehicle and, hence, income will be computed @ Rs.
4,500 per month. The vehicles are purchased in June 2013 and, hence, income will be
computed for 10 months. Thus, annual income will come to Rs. 90,000.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q37. On 3rd
December, 2013, Mr. Raj started business of hiring goods vehicles and
purchased 1 light goods vehicle on the same day. The vehicle was purchased on
installment system (down payment 40%) and entire consideration had to be paid in
3 years. In this case he cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE because he has
purchased the vehicle on installment system.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer
For the purpose of section 44AE, an assessee, who is in possession of a goods carriage,
whether taken on hire purchase or on installments and for which the whole or part of the
amount payable is still due, shall be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage. In
this case the assessee shall be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage and income
will be computed as per the provisions of section 44AE.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q38. On 3rd
March, 2013, Mr. Roop started business of hiring of goods vehicles and
purchased 1 light goods vehicle on the same day. The vehicle was purchased on
credit basis and the consideration had to be paid in next month. In this case he
cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE because he has purchased the vehicle
on credit and the entire consideration is not paid.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
For the purpose of section 44AE, an assessee, who is in possession of a goods carriage,
whether taken on hire purchase or on installments and for which the whole or part of the
amount payable is still due, shall be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage.
Thus, in case where the whole or part of the amount payable is still due the assessee shall
be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q39. On 25th
June, 2013, Mr. Sunil started business of hiring of goods vehicles and
purchased 2 light goods vehicles on the same day. The vehicles were purchased on
credit (40%0 consideration was paid) and the balance consideration had to be paid
in 36 monthly installments. In this case income of Mr. Sunil as per the provisions of
section 44AE will come to Rs. 64,800 being 40% of presumptive income.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
For the purpose of section 44AE, an assessee, who is in possession of a goods carriage,
whether taken on hire purchase or on installments and for which the whole or part of the
amount payable is still due, shall be deemed to be the owner of such goods carriage. In
this case the vehicle is light goods vehicle and income will be computed @ Rs. 4,500 per
month. The vehicles were purchased in June, 2013 and, income will be computed for 10
months. It should be noted that income will be competed at full rate of Rs. 4,500 even if
40% consideration is only paid.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q40. Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per
month /Rs. 5,000 per month) will be gross income of the business covered under this
scheme.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this scheme.
From the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation) from such
income.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q41. Mr. Kapil owned 3 heavy goods vehicles during the year 2012-13. He wants to
adopt the provisions of section 44AE and wants declare income on presumptive
basis @ Rs. 5,000 per month per vehicle. His gross income from this business will
come to Rs. 1,80,000 and net taxable income after claiming deduction on account of
depreciation amounting to Rs. 80,000 will come to Rs. 1,00,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this scheme. From
the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation).
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q42. Mr. Suraj owned 12 heavy goods vehicle during the year 2012-13. He wants to
adopt the provisions of section 44AE and to declare income on presumptive basis @
Rs. 5,000 per month per vehicle. After declaring income @ Rs. 5,000 per month per
vehicle he will not be claiming any further deduction because in case of an assessee
opting for the provisions of section 44AE, he is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation) from
the presumptive income. Thus, in this case his income as per the provisions of
section 44AE will come to Rs. 7,20,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Suraj owns more
than 10 trucks and, hence, he cannot opt for the provisions of section 44AE and his
income will be computed in normal manner.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q43. Mr. Sujal owned 10 heavy goods vehicles during the year 2012-13. He wants to
adopt the provisions of section 44AE and declare income on presumptive basis @
Rs. 5,000 per month per vehicle. As per the provisions of section 44AE, his gross
income from this business will come to Rs. 6,00,000 and net taxable income after
claiming deduction on account of salary to administrative office staff amounting to
Rs. 1,00,000 will come to Rs. 5,00,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this scheme. From
the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation).
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q44. Mr. Suraj owned 2 heavy goods vehicles during the year 2012-13. He wants to
adopt the provisions of section 44AE and declare income on presumptive basis @
Rs. 5,000 per month per vehicle. His gross income as per the provisions of section
44AE from this business will come to Rs. 1,20,000 and net taxable income after
claiming deduction on account of un absorbed depreciation amounting to Rs. 20,000
will come to Rs. 1,00,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this scheme. From
the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation).
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q45. Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per
month /Rs. 5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this
scheme. From the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim
any deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed
depreciation) but can claim deduction on account of brought forward business loss.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this scheme. From
the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation). However,
deduction is available in respect of brought forward business loss.
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q46. Mr. Mohan is engaged in goods transportation business and owns 5 heavy
goods vehicles. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE and declare income
@ Rs. 5,000 per month per goods vehicle. He has brought forward business loss of
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Rs. 84,000. In this case his taxable income after applying the provisions of section
44AE will come to Rs. 2,16,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this scheme. From
the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation). However,
deduction is available in respect of brought forward business loss. Thus, in this case,
from the presumptive income of Rs. 3,00,000 (Rs. 5,000 per month per vehicle × 5
vehicles × 12 months), brought forward loss of Rs. 84,000 will be adjusted and the net
income, i.e., taxable income will come to Rs. 2,16,000 (he does not have any other
income).
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q47. Mr. Mohan is engaged in goods transport business and owns 4 light goods
vehicles. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE and declare income @
Rs. 4,500 per month per goods vehicle. He has brought forward loss from house
property of Rs. 84,000. In this case his taxable income after applying the provisions
of section 44AE will come to Rs. 2,16,000.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income for the business covered under this scheme. From
the net income computed as above, assessee is not permitted to claim any deduction
under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation). However,
deduction is available in respect of brought forward business loss. In this case the loss is
brought forward house property loss and not business loss. Brought forward loss from
house property cannot be adjusted against business income and, hence, in this case the
loss of Rs. 84,000 cannot be adjusted against income of Rs. 2,16,00 (Rs. 4,500 per month
per vehicle × 4 vehicles × 12 months). Thus, taxable income will come to Rs. 2,16,000.
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q48. Mr. Kumar is engaged in transportation business and owns only 5 heavy goods
vehicles. He has adopted the provisions of section 44AE and declared income of Rs.
3,00,000. From income of Rs. 3,00,000 declared by him as per the provisions of
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
section 44AE, the Assessing Officer wants to disallow payment made in cash under
section 40A(3). Is the action of Assessing Officer correct?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income of the business covered under this scheme. From
income computed at the aforesaid rate, no disallowance can be made under sections 40,
40A and 43B. Hence, the action of the Assessing Officer is not correct.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (a) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q49. Mr. Kripal is engaged in transport business and owns only 5 heavy goods
vehicles. He has adopted the provisions of section 44AE and declared income of Rs.
3,00,000. From income of Rs. 3,00,000 declared by him as per the provisions of
section 44AE, the Assessing Officer wants to disallow payment made to related
parties under section 40A(2). Is the action of Assessing Officer correct?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income of the business covered under this scheme. From
income computed at the aforesaid rate, no disallowance can be made under sections 40,
40A and 43B. Hence, the action of the Assessing Officer is not correct.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (a) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q50. Mr. Kripal is engaged in transport business and owns only 5 heavy goods
vehicles. He has adopted the provisions of section 44AE and declared income of Rs.
3,00,000. From income of Rs. 3,00,000 declared by him as per the provisions of
section 44AE, the Assessing Officer wants to disallow unpaid interest on bank loan
under section 43B. Is the action of Assessing Officer correct?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income of the business covered under this scheme. From
income computed at the aforesaid rate, no disallowance can be made under sections 40,
40A and 43B. Hence, the action of the Assessing Officer is not correct.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (a) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q51. SM Transport Company (a partnership firm) is engaged in transportation
business and owns only 5 heavy goods vehicles. The firm has adopted the provisions
of section 44AE and declared income of Rs. 3,00,000. From income of Rs. 3,00,000
declared by the firm as per the provisions of section 44AE, the Assessing Officer
wants to disallow payment of commission made without deduction of tax. Is the
action of Assessing Officer correct?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
Income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE (i.e., @ Rs. 4,500 per month /Rs.
5,000 per month) will be net income of the business covered under this scheme. From
income computed at the aforesaid rate, no disallowance can be made under sections 40,
40A and 43B. Hence, the action of the Assessing Officer is not correct.
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (a) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q52. Mr. Kapoor is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods
carriages. He owned 8 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and
declared income as per the provisions of section 44AE. After computing the income
@ Rs. 5,000 per month, he wants to claim further deduction of Rs. 1,00,000 under
section 80C in respect of insurance premium. Can he do so as per the provisions of
section 44AE?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. However, there is no restriction on claiming deduction under section
80C to 80U. Thus, in this case Mr. Kapoor can claim deduction under section 80C from
the income computed as per the provisions of section 44AE.
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (b) giving incorrect provisions is not correct.
Q53. SM Transport Corporation, a partnership firm, is engaged in the business of
plying, hiring or leasing of goods carriages and owned 6 heavy goods vehicles during
the previous year 2012-13 and declared income as per the provisions of section
44AE. After computing the income @ Rs. 5,000 per month, the firm wants to claim
further deduction on account of remuneration of Rs. 50,000 paid to partners and
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
interest of Rs. 1,20,000 paid to partners (@12%). Can the firm do so as per the
provisions of section 44AE?
(a) Yes (b) No
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE, from the net income computed at the prescribed
rate, i.e., Rs. 4,500 per month/Rs. 5,000 per month, assessee is not permitted to claim any
deduction under sections 30 to 38 (including depreciation or unabsorbed depreciation)
from such income. However, in case of an assessee, being a partnership firm, further
deduction on account of remuneration and interest paid to its partners within the limit
specified under section 40(b) is allowed. Thus, in this case the firm can claim further
deduction on account of remuneration and interest paid to its partners within the limit
specified under section 40(b).
Thus, option (a) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (a) is the correct option since it gives the correct
provisions. Other option, viz., option (b) giving incorrect provision is not correct.
Q54. As per the provisions of section 44AE an assessee opting for the presumptive
taxation scheme is not permitted to claim deduction on account of various
expenditures including depreciation, thus, the WDV of any asset used in the
business covered under the scheme of section 44AE shall be calculated as if no
depreciation as per section 32 is claimed and allowed.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE an assessee opting for the presumptive taxation
scheme is not permitted to claim deduction on account of various expenditures including
depreciation. However, the WDV of any asset used in the business covered under the
scheme of section 44AE shall be calculated as if depreciation as per section 32 is claimed
and allowed. Thus, even though no depreciation is available separately, yet for purpose of
computation of the WDV of the asset depreciation will be deducted.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q55. Mr. Kumar is running a transport business and own 5 heavy goods vehicles.
The opening WDV of the block of asset consisting the goods vehicle as on 1.4.2012
was Rs. 8,40,000 (depreciation rate @ 10%). For the year 2012-13 the firm opted for
the provisions of section 44AE and declared income of Rs. 3,00,000. In the next year
the firm plans to opt for the normal provisions and to declare income at lower rate
as compared to Rs. 5,000 per vehicle per month. In this case what will be the WDV
eligible for computing depreciation in the next year, i.e., 2013-14.
(a) Rs. 8,40,000 (b) Rs. 7,14,000
(c) Rs. 7,41,000 (d) Rs. 4,17,000
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE an assessee opting for the presumptive taxation
scheme is not permitted to claim deduction on account of various expenditures, including
depreciation. However, the WDV of any asset used in the business covered under the
scheme of section 44AE shall be calculated as if depreciation as per section 32 is claimed
and allowed. Thus, even though no depreciation is available separately, yet for purpose of
computation of the WDV of the asset depreciation will be deducted. Thus, in this case the
WDV eligible for depreciation for the year 2013-14 will be computed as follows :
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Opening WDV as on 1.4.2012 8,40,000
(-) Depreciation for the year 2012-13 1,26,000
Closing WDV for the year 7,14,000
WDV eligible for depreciation for the year 2013-13 7,14,000
Thus, option (b) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (b) is the correct option since it gives the correct
amount of WDV. All the other options, viz., options (a), (c) and (d) giving incorrect
WDV are not correct.
Q56. Mr. Sunil is running a transport business and owns 5 heavy goods vehicle. The
opening WDV of the block of asset consisting of office building as on 1.4.2012 is Rs.
1,84,000 (depreciation rate @ 10%). For the year 2012-13 the firm opted for the
provisions of section 44AE and declared income Rs. 3,00,000. In the next year the
firm plans to opt for the normal provisions and to declare income at lower rate as
compared to Rs. 5,000 per vehicle per month. In this case what will be the WDV
eligible for computing depreciation in the next year, i.e., 2013-14.
(a) Rs. 1,84,000 (b) Rs. 1,65,400
(c) Rs. 1,56,400 (d) Rs. 56,400
Correct answer (c)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE an assessee opting for the presumptive taxation
scheme is not permitted to claim deduction on account of various expenditures, including
depreciation. However, the WDV of any asset used in the business covered under the
scheme of section 44AE shall be calculated as if depreciation as per section 32 is claimed
and allowed. Thus, even though no depreciation is available separately, yet for purpose of
computation of the WDV of the asset, depreciation will be deducted. This rule will apply
to all the depreciable assets whether goods vehicle or any other business asset. Thus, in
this case the WDV of building eligible for depreciation for the year 2013-14 will be
computed as follows :
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Opening WDV as on 1.4.2012 1,84,000
(-) Depreciation for the year 2012-13 27,600
Closing WDV for the year 1,56,400
WDV eligible for depreciation for the year 2013-13 1,56,400
Thus, option (c) is the correct option.
Comment on incorrect answer: Option (c) is the correct option since it gives the correct
amount of WDV. All the other options, viz., options (a), (b) and (d) giving incorrect
WDV are not correct.
Q57. As per the provisions of section 44AE an assessee who adopts the provisions of
section 44AE is required to maintain books of account as per section 44AA, but is
granted relief from maintenance of detailed books of account like journal, cash
book, ledger, etc.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (a)
Justification of correct answer:
An assessee who adopts the provisions of section 44AE is not required to maintain books
of account as per section 44AA (applicable only for business covered by this section).
Thus, the statement given in the question is true and, hence, option (a) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is true. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q58. As per the provisions of section 44AE an assessee who adopts the provisions of
section 44AE is not required to maintain books of account as per section 44AA.
However, in respect of such business the provisions of section 44AB (relating to
audit) are applicable.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
An assessee who adopts the provisions of section 44AE is not required to maintain books
of account as per section 44AA (applicable only for business covered by this section).
Further, in respect of such business the provisions of section 44AB (relating to audit) are
also not applicable.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q59. Mr. Sunil is engaged in passenger transportation business and owns 5 mini
buses. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE and to declare income @
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Rs. 4,500 per bus per month. In this case he will not be liable to maintain the books
of account since he is adopting the provisions of section 44AE.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE do not apply to a person engaged in the business of
passenger transportation.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q60. Mr. Soham is engaged in passenger transportation business and owns 10 heavy
buses. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE and to declare income @
Rs. 5,000 per bus per month. In this case he will not be liable to maintain the books
of account since he is adopting the provisions of section 44AE.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE do not apply to a person engaged in the business of
passenger transportation.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q61. Mr. Kumar is engaged in passenger transportation business and owns 10
heavy buses. He wants to adopt the provisions of section 44AE and declare income
@ Rs. 5,000 per bus per month. In this case he will not be liable to get his account
audited as per the provisions of section 44AB.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE do not apply to a person engaged in the business of
passenger transportation.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q62. Mr. Kaushal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods
carriages. He owned 8 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13 and
declared income as per the provisions of section 44AE. In this case he will not be
liable to maintain the books of account in respect of all his businesses, whether
covered under section 44AE or not.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
As per the provisions of section 44AE an assessee who adopts the provisions of section
44AE is not required to maintain books of account as per section 44AA. However, it
should be noted that the relief is available only in respect of business covered by the
provisions of section 44AE and not in respect of any other business. Thus, if Mr. Kaushal
owns any other business, then in respect of such business the provisions of section 44AA
in respect of maintenance of books of account will apply.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q63. Mr. Raj is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages.
He owned 18 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. In this case, if
he declares income at the rate of Rs. 5,000 per month then he will be liable to
maintain the books of account of the transportation business but will not be liable to
get these accounts audited.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
In this case the provisions of section 44AE cannot be adopted by Mr. Raj because he
owns more than 10 goods vehicles and, hence, he will be liable to maintain books of
account as prescribed under section 44AA in respect of above business and get the
accounts audited.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q64. Mr. Vasu is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages. He owns 18 heavy goods vehicles. In December, 2013 he sold 10 goods
vehicles. In this case he can adopt the provisions of section 44AE from December
onwards since he owned only 8 goods vehicle there after.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Vasu owned more
than 10 vehicles till December and, hence, he cannot adopt the provisions of section
44AE for the year 2012-13.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q65. Mr. Suraj is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages. He owns 8 heavy goods vehicles. In December, 2013 he purchased 10 new
goods vehicles. In this case he can adopt the provisions of section 44AE upto
December, 2013 since he owned only 8 goods vehicle till December.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Vasu owned more
than 10 vehicles from December onwards and, hence, he cannot adopt the provisions of
section 44AE for the year 2012-13.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q66. Mr. Soham is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages. He owns 18 heavy goods vehicles. In December, 2013 he sold 10 goods
vehicles. In this case he can adopt the provisions of section 44AE for the year 2013-
14.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Vasu owned more
than 10 vehicles during the year 2013-14 and, hence, he cannot adopt the provisions of
section 44AE for the year 2013-14.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (b) is not correct.
Q67. Mr. Soham is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages. He owns 18 heavy goods vehicles. In December, 2013 he sold 10 goods
vehicles. In this case he cannot adopt the provisions of section 44AE for the year
2013-14 or any other year since he owned more than 10 goods vehicle at once.
(a) True (b) False
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The provisions of section 44AE can be adopted by an assessee who is engaged in the
business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages and does not own more than ten
goods vehicles at any time during the previous year. In this case Mr. Vasu owned more
than 10 vehicles during the year 2013-14 and hence he cannot adopt the provisions of
section 44AE for the year 2013-14.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Q68. Mr. Raja is running a transportation business and owned 9 light goods vehicle
during the year 2012-13. His monthly income per vehicle per month is Rs. 3,000. In
this case he cannot declare income of Rs. 3,000 since it is below the limit of Rs. 4,500
as prescribed under section 44AE.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
If the actual income from the business covered under section 44AE is lower than the
income prescribed under the presumptive scheme, then the assessee can declare income
from aforesaid business at a lower rate (i.e., at less than Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000).
If the assessee declares lower income, then the relief from maintenance of account is not
available and he is required to maintain the books of account as per section 44AA and
further, he has to get such books of account audited.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q69. Mr. Rupesh is running a transportation business and owned 9 heavy goods
vehicles during the year 2012-13. His monthly income per vehicle is Rs. 13,000. In
this case he cannot declare income of Rs. 13,000 since it is above the limit of Rs.
5,000 as prescribed under section 44AE.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The scheme permits the assessee to declare at his option higher income (i.e., higher rate
than Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000).
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com
Q70. Mr. Kamal is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages and owned 9 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. His
actual income per goods vehicle is more than Rs. 5,000 per month. In this case he
can declare income above than the limit prescribed under section 44AE but in this
case he has to maintain regular books of account and get the accounts audited.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
The scheme permits the assessee to declare at his option higher income (i.e., higher rate
than Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000). If the scheme is adopted and higher income is declared then
there is no need to maintain books of account or to get the accounts audited.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
Q71. Mr. Viren is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing of goods
carriages and owned 9 heavy goods vehicles during the previous year 2012-13. His
actual income per goods vehicle is less than Rs. 5,000 per month. In this case, he can
declare lower income as compared to the limit prescribed under section 44AE and
he will not be liable to maintain the regular books of account since he is declaring
lower income.
(a) True (b) False
Correct answer (b)
Justification of correct answer:
If the actual income from the business covered under section 44AE is lower than the
income prescribed under the presumptive scheme, then the assessee can declare income
from aforesaid business at a lower rate (i.e., at less than Rs. 4,500/Rs. 5,000).
If the assessee declares lower income, then the relief from maintenance of account is not
available and he is required to maintain the books of account as per section 44AA and
further, he has to get such books of account audited.
Thus, the statement given in the question is false and, hence, option (b) is the correct
option.
Comment on incorrect answer: The statement given in the question is false. Hence,
option (a) is not correct.
(As amended by Finance Act, 2013)source : www.trpscheme.com