aditivos04B

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    1/37

    Additives for

    Warm Mix Asphalt

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    2/37

    Content :

    Warm Mix Asphalt technologies

    CecabaseRT technology

    Advantages of CecabaseRT

    Examples of field jobs

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    3/37

    Warm Mix Asphalt technologies

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    4/37

    4

    To remove liquid waterin theaggregates

    To reduce the bitumen viscosityenough to fully coat the aggregates in

    a time scale compatible with theprocess

    4

    Working at high temperature isnot artificial, it is necessary:

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

    Temperature (C)

    P

    en35/50BitumenViscosity(Pa.s

    )

    Why we use hotmixes?

    T

    AGGREGATE

    1. The bitumen temperature is fixedby the refinery vacuum distillation processpractically, difficult reduce bitumen T.

    2. The aggregates represent ~95% of an asphalt mixture.

    Buthow to reduce the asphalt mixture fabrication temperature?

    Decreasing the process temperaturetranslates into decreasing the aggregates

    temperature.

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    5/37

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    6/37

    Water Foam based processes

    Consists in adding waterto form a foamwhen the water evaporatesdue tothe mix temperature. The water may be added directly (nozzles) or indirectly usingzeolites, wet fine mineral aggregates, emulsion, etc..

    Improves aggregates coating thanks to an apparent volume enhancementof binder bythe foam. Probably improves workability of the mix thanks to lubricating effect of the foam.

    m m m m

    Grampr, L, Gonzalez-Lon, J,A. and Barreto, G. (2008) Enrobs tides par additivation chimique Revue Gnrale des Routes, No866,2008, pp 44-50.

    http://www.astecinc.com

    Zeolite

    Compaction can become an issue as thefoam disappearsshortly after production

    These techniques usually require amodificationof the mixing plant

    Precautions should be taken due to the

    addition of water(cohesion of theasphalt mix, water susceptibility of the mix)

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/Zeolite-ZSM-5-3D-vdW.pnghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/Zeolite-ZSM-5-3D-vdW.png
  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    7/37

    Allows for a coverage of the mineral

    aggregate at reduced temperatures

    Below the crystallizationtemperatureof the wax (~100C)workability of the mixture becomespoor and compaction cant beachieved.

    The addition of waxes change thebitumencharacteristics (Penetrationgrade, viscosity, low temperatureproperties, etc)

    Wax based chemicals additives

    Additives (used at 2-3 wt% in asphalt binder) that reduce the viscosity of the

    asphalt binder at processing conditions

    Improved aggregates coating at lower temperature thanks to viscosity reductionof binder by the liquid (melted) productwhich acts as a solvent. An improvedworkability of the mix is possible to the lower viscosity of binder

    Hurley, G.C.; Prowell, B. D. Evaluation of SASOBIT for us in Warm mix asphalt.

    NCAT Report 05-06. June 2005

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    8/37

    Surfactant additives

    Addition of a chemical surfactantadditive (0.3-0.5 wt% in the binder) thatchanges interfacial propertiesof the binder without changing asphalt binderrheology

    Improved coatingat lower temperature thanks to surface tension reduction at thebinder/aggregate interface

    Improved workability of the mix thanks the control the interface structurebetweenbitumen and aggregates, thus reducing the internal frictionsthat increase theworkabilityof an asphalt mixture.

    Improved striping resistance of the mix thanks to surfactant action at binder/aggregateinterface

    Chemical additive

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    9/37

    9

    SurfactantAdditives

    Wax Additives

    Foaming

    techniques

    Zeolites

    TC reduction Cost per ton of mix Pros and Cons

    - 40C ~ 1/T

    Cheapest and easiest additive technique

    Robust, compaction aid

    Anti-stripping effectkeep HMA mechanical prop.

    Effective for long hauling

    Consumption of Additive for each ton produced

    - 30 to - 40C 2 - 3/T

    Increase rut resistanceEffective for long haulingComplex to incorporate (solid pellets)Compaction issues below crystallization ~100CModification of binder (low T properties, cracking)

    - 15 to - 30C0 but several

    10,000investment

    Cheap Process after initial investmentShort lifetime of foam

    Average aggregate coating at WMA temperatureMix sensitive (binder, aggregate, lime)

    - 30C 2 - 3/T

    Increased lifetime of the foamPlant modification, complex introduction kit

    Anti-strip often necessaryModification of mix design

    WMA techniques in a nutshell

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    10/37

    CecabaseRT technology

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    11/37

    Typical properties of the additive :

    LiquidViscosity < 1000 cPo at 20C Density :~ 1.00

    Flash point : > 200C

    Readily soluble in asphalt binder

    Packaging: bulk, ~1000kg IBC,~200kg drums (1 drum eq. to 1000T of mix)

    How to use CecabaseRT :

    In line orbatchaddition to the asphalt binder

    0.3 to 0.5%dosage based on total binder weight

    Compatiblewith all kinds of bindersno curing time

    Stablein stored asphalt binder over 7 days

    Mix production temperature is reduced to120-140C depending on mix type : Heating of aggregates is typically ~ 40C less than

    the corresponding HMA

    Binder temperature remains the same as HMA

    Good compaction is ensured down to 90-110C

    How to use CecabaseRT

    Asphalt (usual T)

    Aggregates

    (reduced T)

    WMA

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    12/37

    Effect of Cecabase RT on binderproperties

    Dynamic viscositymeasured at constantshear rate : 100 s-1

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    80 100 120 140 160

    Temperature (C)

    Viscosity(Pas)

    Neat 35/50 bitumen

    + 0.3% additive

    + 0.5% additive

    Since the additive interact at

    the aggregate surfaceand

    only small amountsare

    required to have the improved

    workability on the mix thereis no effect on the properties

    on the binder

    Viscosity unchanged bythe additive atconcentrations used

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    13/37

    Effects of CecabaseRT

    50/70Asphalt

    50/70 Asphalt+ 0.5% CB RT

    30/45Asphalt

    30/45 Asphalt+0.5% CB RT

    SBS modifiedAsphalt

    SBS modifiedAsphalt +0.5% RT

    Penetration(1/10mm)

    51 50 33 37 52 56

    Ring andBall (C)

    51.2 50.8 54.2 53.6 57.8 57.2

    No change in Asphalt penetration grade or R&B temperature

    Electron microscopy shows no difference of mix with HMA :

    mm

    25 m

    Good distribution ofaggregates

    Good coverage ofaggregates (even fines)

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    14/37

    Effect of additive on the mix

    160C 120C

    Reference mix Mix +0.5%Cecabase RT

    Reference mix Mix +0.5%Cecabase RT

    Void % 2.0 1.9 3.2 2.8

    Marshall Stability

    (kN)

    11.0 10.5 8.8 10.0

    Usually only small differencesare observed through standard compactionmethods (ex. Marshall)

    The effect of the additive is seen on the workabilityof the asphalt mix.

    However, the evaluationof workability in the laboratory can be quitechallenging

    Bennert, T.; Reinke, G.; Mogawer, W.; Mooney, K. (2010) Assessment of Workability / Compactability of Warm Mix Asphalt.

    2010 TRB Meeting Proceedings, paper 10-2223

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    15/37

    Workability effect of Cecabase RT

    Evaluation of the workability of WMA in the lab is challenging

    Test based on the recommendations onreport 691 from NCHRP (US)

    Comparison of the number of gyrationsrequired to achieve a given void % with agyratory compactor :

    Evaluation by laboratory BaustofflaborHamburg, following standard German testfor workability

    Torque recording of a screw type rotationaldevice introduced in the mix :

    Mixing at 120C, measurement at 90C, 8% void240

    250

    260

    270

    280

    290

    300

    310

    320

    330

    Reference asphalt mix Asphalt mix with 0,5%

    Cecabase RT

    Reference asphalt mix Asphalt mix with 0,5%

    Cecabase RT

    160C 120C

    Torque(N.cm)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    Control HMA 160C Control WMA (no add it ive) 120C WMA 120C - Cecabase RT - 0 ,4%

    Gyration#

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    16/37

    Improvements of adhesion are achieved with CecabaseRT

    ITSR :

    Mechanical characterization

    Open-graded friction course with modified binder, PG 76-28Compaction PCG 600kPa, 40 gyrations

    Conditioning 1 day in water at 60C0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    Void % ITS (kN)

    conditioned

    ITS (kN)

    Void%

    orITS(kN)

    Reference HMA 160C

    Reference WMA 120C without additive

    WMA 120C with 0,4% Cecabase RT

    TSR

    Hot Mix Asphalt 0.58

    WMA without

    Additive 0.31

    WMA with

    Cecabase RT 0.84

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    17/37

    Hamburg Test

    The hamburg test is a mix between a rutting test and a anti-stripping test.

    Gmm (Maxtheoretical

    specific gravity)

    Air voids (%) Max. rut depth(mm)

    HMA (160C) 2.425 6.95 -13.3

    WMA (130C,

    0.4% CB RT)2.445 7.2 -9.1

    AASHTO T324

    0/25mm mix, compacted in SGC

    20,000 wheel passes

    In water at 50C

    http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/labs/mixtures/hamburg.cfm

    Hajj, E.; Cortez, E. Evaluation of the Cecabase RT warm mix additive, final report. Septembre 2001 University of

    Nevada, Reno US

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    18/37

    Rutting resistance

    NF P 98-253-1 Hot mixasphalt

    Warmmix

    asphalt

    Limits inthe std.

    Rutting (%)after 30,000cycles

    4.11 4.19

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    19/37

    Fatigue

    Oliveira, J.; Silva, H.; Abreu, L.; Gonzalez-Leon, J. The role of a surfactant based additive on the production of

    recycled warm mix asphaltsLess is more. Construction and Building Materials 35 2012 693-700

    Evaluated by the University of Minho (Portugal) on a regular 0/10 mix and a 0/10 mix with50% RAP, following the EN 12697-24.

    4 point bending test

    T 20C, 10 Hz

    Mix A 0/10

    Mix B 0/10 + 50% RAP

    Similar Fatiguebehaviorbetween HMAand WMA with

    additive

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    20/37

    Advantages of CecabaseRT

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    21/37

    2121

    Compaction aid

    Fast opening to traffic

    Less heat & fumes

    Environment Comfort Flexibility

    Advantages of WMA with CecabaseRT

    Less emissions

    Energy savings

    Increase use of RAP

    Increased capacity

    Night or winter work

    Longer hauling

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    22/37

    Reduction of gas emissions

    CO2

    (Nm3/ton)

    Eq. NO2

    (g/ton)

    TVOC

    (g/ton)

    PAH

    (g/ton)

    HMA 14.6 6.8 80.6 78.6

    WMA 9.0 5.0 14.3 35.5

    -38% -26% -83% -55%

    Measurements taken on job site, on a worker, a paver driver anda compactor driver :

    Typical values measured at the plantstack (production of very thinasphalt cement) :

    Worker Paver Compactor

    HMA 0.01549 0.0097 *

    WMA 0.0053 0.0045 0.0019

    -66% -54% *

    Both HMA and WMA are well below exposure limits

    (close to detection limits)

    More than 20 different polyaromatics (PAH)

    measuredexample :

    Naphthalene(mg/m3)

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    23/37

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    24/37

    Increased use of recycled material

    120

    160

    200

    240

    280

    320

    360

    400

    440

    480

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    % RAP

    AggregateT(C)

    Tmix 120C

    Tmix 160C

    Calculated temperatures

    + 10-15% RAP

    RAP

    Virgin aggregates

    CecabaseRT increase the amount

    of RAP that can be introduced inthe mix by 10 - 15% :

    Easier mix compaction

    Less overheating of virginaggregates

    Working for plants with and withoutheating systems for RAP

    Significant reductions of the asphaltmix cost

    Also possible with shingles (RAS)and crumb rubber (CRA)

    Cold RAP

    systems

    Pre-heated

    RAP systems

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    25/37

    Use as Compaction Aid

    The workability effectof CecabaseRT can be used

    to achieve the desired compaction target at Hot Mixtemperatures in various cases :

    Fasterprogression : typically fewer compaction passesare required compared to HMA without additive

    Gives more securityfor difficult mixes (high-end void%)

    Increase chance of getting compaction bonus

    Improve workability of stiff mixes(high RAP ) Ability to work at

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    26/37

    Dust

    (mg/m3)

    Fumes

    (mg/m3)

    Mix ofPollutants

    (mg/m3)

    HMA 12 11.4 12

    WMA 3.5 3 2.9

    -71% -74% -76%

    Similar reductions are measuredat the plant:

    Reduction of dust and fumes

    Typical reductions measured on the paver(SMA job) :

    HMA WMA

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    27/37

    Increase of Production rate

    In some cases, residence time of aggregates in the barrel can bedecreased (lower heating T) without changing the burner settings

    Case study : an increase from 210 to 280 tons of mix/hr (~ 30%

    increase) was possible when switching from HMA to WMA

    Useful during peak seasonor for debottlenecking

    Flexible technology : easy to switch from HMA to WMA and back

    Asphalt (usual T)

    Aggregates

    WMA120C

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    28/37

    Longer hauling

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    0 50 100 150 200Time (min)

    Tem

    perature(C)

    WMA HMA

    Limitfor WMA paving

    HMA production

    WMA production

    + 200%+25%

    Limitfor HMA paving

    A WMA with CecabaseRTmay be paved up to 25% later than standard HMA

    A HMA with CecabaseRTmay be paved after a hauling time up to 3 timeslonger

    t0

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    29/37

    Examples of field jobs

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    30/37

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    31/37

    Examples of field jobs - France

    Bordeaux 2008High traffic road

    High modulus asphalt cement (EME)

    10/20 [1/10mm] asphalt

    Produced at 130C (normally 170C). Laid down at 125C

    Average density 95,6%

    Gaillac 2011BBSGStandard 0/10 mm wearing course (BBSG), 6 cm layer

    0,4% Cecabase RT Bio10

    Cecabase RT945 used at 0.4%, added in tank 5 days before

    500 tons paved at 120CHigh volume road : AADT > 15000

    St Flour 2009Highway A75

    Open graded friction course (BBTM) Thin layer 2,5 cm

    5,6% binder, polymer modified Styrelf 13-600,4% Cecabase RT945

    4000 tons produced at 135C, paved at 120C, compacted at 110C

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    32/37

    Examples of field jobs - Europe

    Poland 2007Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA)

    0-8 mm aggregates - 0.4% fibers in the mix

    Asphalt binder Pen. 50 + 3% SBS0,4% CecabaseRT945

    3000 tons produced at 130C, paved at 120C, compacted at 100C

    Italy (Padova) 2012

    Fine gradation D8 type15% RAP added cold at the plant

    Asphalt 70/100 penetration0,4% CecabaseRT Bio10

    Mix produced at 150C, paved at 130C, compacted at

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    33/37

    Examples of field jobs - AmericaNew York State 20082 different jobs

    1300T dense-graded mix with 30% RAP (Road 31 along Seneca River)

    1000T dense-graded mix without RAP (Road 18 near Utica)Production at 120-130C, paved at 120C with good workability

    Tennessee (Sevierville) 2012

    Mix with difficult limestone aggregate15% RAPhigh traffic road

    Asphalt PG64-22CecabaseRT945 and antistrip

    Night work, light rain - Mix produced at 130C, compacted at 113C

    Canada (Alberta) 200925,000 tons job

    Dense graded mix without RAP (gravel pit aggregates)Interstate 35

    Asphalt binder 200-300 Pen. with antistrip + 0.2% CecabaseRT945

    Produced at 120C (vs 150C for control HMA)

    California 2010Caltrans project with crumb rubber

    12.5mm gap graded mixAsphalt PG 64-16 with 18% scrap tire

    0.4% CecabaseRT - Produced at 130C (vs 165C for control HMA)

    Tested on Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS) Cecabase RT WMA ismore rut resistant than control HMA

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    34/37

    Examples of field jobs Asia & LatAm

    Australia 2008High %RAP mix

    Base and Wearing Courses Type H-10mm30 and 40% RAPrespectively

    Paving temperatures : 108-115C

    Average compaction around 95%

    Japan 2009Open graded type

    -30C to -50C temperature decrease - Rainy conditions3000 tons produced at 130C, paved at 120C, compacted at 100C

    China 20110-8 mm aggregates - 0.4% fibers in the mix

    Asphalt binder Pen. 50 + 3% SBS0,4% Cecabase RT

    3000 tons produced at 130C, paved at 120C,compacted at 100C

    Argentina 2010

    Open graded type mixAsphalt grade CA-30 (pen 50/60) with0,4% Cecabase RT945

    Temperature decreased to 130CCore sampling

    l l b l

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    35/37

    A real global coverage

    Today Cecabase RT is present in more than 50 countries

    More than 150 different customershave chosen Cecabase RT additives

    Several millions tonsof Warm Mix Asphalt are produced each year withCecabase RT technology

    Field jobs

    Lab trials

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    36/37

    A simple way to reduce temperature of asphalt mixes by~ 40C by the addition of a liquid additive :

    Patentedtechnology used since 2004on the field

    Robust, work with all binders and asphalt mixes

    No plant modification or high maintenance costs

    Most cost-competitivesolution among additives

    Systematic back-upof CECA technical experts

    Mechanical properties of WMA are similar to thoseobtained with a control HMA

    Benefit from immediate advantages :

    Environment: reduction of emissions, gas savings,use of RAP

    Comfort: compaction aid, less heat & fumes, quickopening to traffic

    Flexibility: increased plant capacity, longer hauling,night or off-season work

  • 8/9/2019 aditivos04B

    37/37

    Th k !