Upload
hunter
View
35
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Innovations conference| Agriculture. Addressing the problem of ground water depletion. June 10, 2014. By Divya Mittal Mayur Dixit Priyank Mishra IAS (OTs) | 2013 BATCH. Agenda. Problem Statement, Assumptions & Analysis. Technical Analysis. Solution Proposed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM OF GROUND WATER DEPLETION
INNOVATIONS CONFERENCE| AGRICULTURE
JUNE 10, 2014
BYDIVYA MITTALMAYUR DIXITPRIYANK MISHRAIAS (OTS) | 2013 BATCH
AGENDA
Problem Statement, Assumptions & Analysis
Technical Analysis
Solution Proposed
Associated Positive Benefits
Evaluation of Strategy
Farmers have preferred growing wheat and rice over other crops due to high productivity and returns Most important irrigation source for agriculture has been Ground Water (GW) via tube wells Decreasing GW level can be attributed to increased demand of GW for agriculture Erratic monsoons has further decreased the discharge to water table and increased dependence on GW Lowered water table has increased power consumption (diesel & electric sets) to extract water Small and marginal farmers are affected the most due to decreasing GW level
Krishi Pradesh is facing severe ground water depletion problem due to increased agricultural activitiesD
ata
Prov
ided
Ass
umpti
ons
Area under food grains has increased from 3.0 to 3.5 million hectares over last few decades The state’s share in food grain production in the country: 30% wheat and 12% rice Cultivated area under irrigation has grown from 70% to 78% in the same time period Agricultural productivity has also seen a healthy growth along with a change in cropping pattern Water table in the district declining at the alarming rate of 55 cm per year
Time period for comparison (‘Few decades’): 1990 to 2014 (24 years) Increase in area under agriculture is less than increase in area under food grain cultivation Food grain productivity increase has been more than average productivity increase of other crops Break up of irrigation: 1990 (50% tube well, 25% canals, 25% others); 2014 (80% tube well, 20% canals)
Ana
lysi
s
Problem Statement
Address the issue of GW depletion in the district by:A. Improving GW situationB. Making the farming sustainable
Analysis shows that mostly group centric issues are responsible for GW depletion by negatively affecting the recharge and discharge of water from the water table
Issues related to increased discharge of GW
Group centric issuesIndividual centric issues
Issues related to decreased recharge of GW
Quadrant 3
Quadrant 2 Quadrant 1
Quadrant 4
Identified Issue Quadrant
GW seen as private property and not as common property resource 3
Poor awareness of criticality of GW situation among the farmers 3
Changing cropping patterns due to market pressures 4
Equity dimensions – Rich farmer vs. Poor farmer 4
Improper planning & management of GW 1,4
Unsustainable number of tube wells 3
Erratic and stochastic nature of climate leading to uncertainty 1,4
Decreased soil porosity and recharge due to extensive use of chemicals 1
Lack of artificial recharging options due to motivation and commitment issues 1,2
Subsidy provided to purchase electric and diesel set and use of power 3,4
Impact Assessment
Quadrant Extent of Impact
Quadrant 1
Quadrant 2
Quadrant 3
Quadrant 4
AGENDA
Problem Statement, Assumptions & Analysis
Technical Analysis
Solution Proposed
Associated Positive Benefits
Evaluation of Strategy
Understanding technical aspects is essential to develop a strategy and implementation plan for addressing the issue of GW depletion (1/2)
Discharge (D) = function of (trans-evaporation, horizontal outflow, artificial pumping out)
Recharge (R) = function of (rainfall, seepage from artificial and natural water bodies)
Locate, map and evaluate the capacity and number of operational bore-wells and pump-sets in the district
Map the district on the basis of (D/R) value: (D/R) > 1 implies unsustainable pumping of GW
Simultaneously understand and map the district on the basis of water table sub-basins which might also be shared by neighboring districts (Figure 1)
Choose locations and capacities of pump-sets to minimize (D/R) of overall sub-basin
Enhancing ‘R’: Assess the possibility of installing artificial recharging methods (Figure 2)
Assessment and evaluation of GW depletion in the district
Assumption: Technical competency to assess and evaluate GW is available with the district and state
Figure 1
Figure 2
Understanding technical aspects is essential to develop a strategy and implementation plan for addressing the issue of GW depletion (2/2)
Figure 3 depicts 3-D water table contour mappingTrough points indicate very low water table levels due to extensive GW discharge (‘D’) through pump-setsCrests indicate higher water table levels due to greater natural recharge (‘R’)Black arrows indicate natural flow of GW
Figure 3
From the technical analysis the planning authority should be able to assess and find out the optimum recharging and discharging points of the water table
But the question that now arises is how to implement this strategyThe challenges/constraints are:
GW usage and extraction methods are in the domain of private property Most of the issues identified, as shown earlier, are group-centric
Objective: How to bring a balance between the private incentives and benefits for the community at large?
AGENDA
Problem Statement, Assumptions & Analysis
Technical Analysis
Solution Proposed
Associated Positive Benefits
Evaluation of Strategy
To address the challenges posed we need to adapt a community based approach and emphasize on the creation of Water User Associations (WUA)
t (time) = 0 t (time) = T
A
B
C
D
AC: Reduction in demand of GW by reducing ‘D’ in the short termBD: Increase in the supply of GW by raising ‘R’ in the short termAB: Demand – Supply gap at t = 0CD: Demand – Supply gap at t = TCD < AB: Impact in short term due to WUA interventions (Reducing the Demand Supply Gap)
Demand Curve of GW
Supply Curve of GW
Shor
t Ter
m R
ecom
men
datio
ns
WUA: A registered entity having all farmers at a Panchayat level with the primary purpose of self regulating recharge and discharge with active support from district administration
WUA reducing ‘D’ in short term Metering the tube wells and putting a cap/regulation on all discharge points Dis-incentivizing excess usage and exceeding usage by penalizing individual farmers by WUA As far as possible, close down the discharge points located in the ‘troughs’ Promote water efficient irrigation systems like drip irrigation, sprinklers, bonding
WUA raising ‘R’ in short term Using community level resources and efforts to build dug wells in those plots/fields which lie close to the crests for
effective recharge Percolation tanks and check dams near the perennial streams to augment water recharge Contour bunding on common property lands Artificial ponds on government unused lands
As shown in the analysis, since Quadrant 3 and 4 issues have maximum impact, they need to be addressed with specific strategy
t (time) = 0 t (time) = NT
A
B
C
D AC: Reduction in demand of GW by reducing ‘D’ in the short termBD: Increase in the supply of GW by raising ‘R’ in the short termAB: Demand – Supply gap at t = 0CD: Demand – Supply gap at t = NTC = D: Creation of surplus in GW usage by long term interventions
Demand Curve of GW
Supply Curve of GW
Long
Ter
m R
ecom
men
datio
ns
Recommendations to reduce discharge of GW(‘D’)
Group centric strategyIndividual centric strategy
Recommendations increase recharge of GW (‘R’)
Quadrant 3 Change the cropping mix from water intensive crops like rice to millets Promote sustainable organic farming
Quadrant 2 Build in-situ dug-wells for artificial recharge
Quadrant 1 Build percolation tanks and artificial ponds on Panchayat lands Incentivize farmers to keep land fallow on rotation basis Grow animal feed for consumption on sharing basis
Quadrant 4 Pump capacity regulation Regulation and relocation of pump sets (away from troughs and close to crests)
AGENDA
Problem Statement, Assumptions & Analysis
Technical Analysis
Solution Proposed
Associated Positive Benefits
Evaluation of Strategy
Possible positive benefits of adapting proposed strategy with additional incentives for stakeholders
Farmers Greater availability of GW leading to reduced agricultural costs Increase in cropping season and scope due to rising GW level in dry season
Enhanced Income
Opportunity of augmenting income by trading GW in the scenario of positive gap between capped extraction limits and actual GW extraction• Farmers growing water incentive crops (F1) can ‘purchase’ GW from farmers
(F2) growing dry and less productive varieties • Extra income generated by F1 is hence shared between F1 and F2
Creating Forward Linkage
Creating forward linkages for making WUA sustainable with district administration support, e.g. providing agri-credit to WUA members at lower rates, agri-insurance at lower premiums It’s a WIN-WIN situation for WUA, farmers and the district administration
AGENDA
Problem Statement, Assumptions & Analysis
Technical Analysis
Solution Proposed
Associated Positive Benefits
Evaluation of Strategy
Evaluation of proposed strategy on the parameters of Sustainability and Stakeholder participation
Proposed Strategy Sustainability Cost-effectiveness Stakeholder Participation
Build in-situ dug-wells for artificial recharge
Change the cropping mix from water intensive crops like rice to millets
Promote sustainable organic farming
Build percolation tanks and artificial ponds on Panchayat lands
Incentivize farmers to keep land fallow on rotation basis
Pump capacity regulation
Regulation and relocation of pump sets (away from troughs and close to crests)
Evaluation table suggests that the proposed strategy scores high in sustainability parameter but there is scope for further improvement in cost-effectiveness and stakeholder participation areas
California Water Foundation. (2014). Recommendations for Sustainable Groundwater Management: Developed Through a Stakeholder Dialogue . California: California Water Foundation.
Umar, R. (2004). Groundwater Flow Modelling and Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Studies in Yamuna–Krishni Sub-basin, Muzaffarnagar District . New Delhi: Indian National Committee on Ground Water Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) Ministry of Water Resources (Govt. of India) .
Shah, T. (1992). Sustainable Development of Ground Water Resource: Lessons form Junagadh. Economic and Political Weekly , 515-20.
IWMI. (2012). Investing in Agricultural Water Management to Benefit Smallholder Farmers in Madhya Pradesh, India. Colombo: International Water Management Institute.
Narasimhan, T. N. (2008). Groundwater Management and Ownership . Economic and Political Weekly , 21-27.
Shah, T. (2008). India’s Master plan for Groundwater Recharge: An Assessment and Some Suggestions for Revision . Economic and Political Weekly , 41-49.
DFID. (2006). Managed Aquifer Recharge: An Assessment of its Role and Effectiveness in Watershed Management . London: Department for International Development, Government of United Kingdom.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
END OF DECK