Upload
builiem
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UJ Poverty Colloquium
Joel Netshitenzhe:
Executive Director: MISTRA
21 July 2011
ADDRESSING CHALLENGES OF POVERTY
Colloquium on Poverty
MAJOR THEMES
2
❶ Definitions and magnitude of poverty
❷ Identifying interventions
❸ Relationship: poverty and economic
growth
❹ Challenges of socio-psychological
capital
❺ Conclusion
DEFINITIONS & MAGNITUDE
3
Introduction
Data and analysis in abundance…
Welcome initiative
MISTRA has joined UJ Centre for Small Business Development, BLSA and other
partners because this initiative has the potential to unite various sectors of society,
proceeding from the understanding that poverty is not just „a government problem‟
Research work on this issue is quite extensive: The Presidency, dsd, universities,
recent OECD report; and international studies e.g. on India, China and World Bank
on Latin America
Is the challenge merely one of implementation?
Various experiences in implementation These include Government War on Poverty initiative led by the Deputy President,
on-going generic socio-economic programmes and the work of dsd in particular
Could argue, as a consequence, that poverty is over-researched and the
challenge is implementation. But this would be inaccurate: embedded in the
weaknesses of implementation are conceptual issues – as reflected in on-going
debates in NEDLAC
Amartya Sen‟s concept of „capability‟ is instructive in
defining poverty:
► eschews a top-down development approach – beyond asserting
rights, it is also necessary to look at „functionings‟ where barriers to
act out of personal choice are removed
► posits understanding of poverty as more than just income; and
asserts transdisciplinary relationship among: economic growth,
social policy, assets, social capital and institutional factors
Income poverty headcount (in 2008 constant Rand):
4
DEFINITIONS & MAGNITUDE Capability and data
Household below 1995 2005 2008
- R524 a month (IES) 53% 48% 49%
- R388 a month (AMPS) 52% 45% 39%
In large measure it reflects improvements in employment – though
this has been negatively affected by the economic downturn – and
access to social grants (from 2.4m in 1997 to 14m in 2010).
(Amartya Sen: “Equality of What”)
Development Indicators, 2010: The Presidency
❸ Depth and severity of poverty:
► the depth of poverty (how far below the poverty line the poorest are)
has declined, reflecting mainly low-paying jobs and social grants
► however, the severity of poverty (square of gap between poverty line
and incomes of poor) has not declined: inequality is not decreasing
► Gini coefficient at about 0.67: poorest 20% earn 2.3% of National
Income and richest 20% about 70%
❹ Location and sectoral manifestation:
5
DEFINITIONS & MAGNITUDE Capability and data
► while a large number of the poor are located in rural areas, 4 Metros
are among the 20 districts/metros with the highest % of those living in
poverty (MLL): many more urban areas if towns added
► most of the affected are children, women and youth: with the latter (15
– 24 year old), employment ratio is 13.2% compared to 40% in Asia
and Latin America and 50% of those looking for work are jobless; 86%
of unemployed youth have not gone beyond Grade 12 and two-thirds
have never worked NPC Diagnostic Report; NSDP: The Presidency
6
Why is it necessary to take into account fiscal
incidence and social expenditure?
DEFINITIONS & MAGNITUDE Fiscal incidence & beyond income
On the one hand…
Fiscal incidence and Gini coefficient
Using the Lorenz and concentration curves for social spending: while social spending
had no impact on Gini coefficient in 1993, it reduces this by about 41% by 2002
Dr Montek Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairperson of the Indian Planning Commission
emphasises that where incomes improve and services do not: income gets
discounted as e.g. poor water services lead to diseases and increased household
expenditure on health. In SA, for e.g. due to apartheid spatial settlement patterns,
workers use about 40% of income on transport
On the other hand… Provision of social services e.g. housing and electricity does improve human
condition; but without income: subsidised housing is in some instances sold or rented
out; and the poor use electricity only for lighting
The Presidency, Ten Year Review
7
IDENTIFYING INTERVENTIONS Hierarchy: government influence & impact
Social grants are quite effective as a direct transfer; but they
are weak on long-term impact, including fiscal sustainability. It
is precisely those interventions with better longer-term impact
that require participation by other social partners.
Exte
nt
of
gove
rnm
en
t
influ
en
ce
Long-term impact on poverty and exclusion
Full-time employment
Support for micro enterprise
Public employment programmes
Social grants
Free basic services and housing
Exte
nt
of
gove
rnm
en
t
influ
en
ce
Long-term impact on poverty and exclusion
Full-time employment
Support for micro enterprise
Public employment programmes
Social grants
Free basic services and housing
Anti-poverty Strategy: The Presidency
❶ Multiplier effect of infrastructure programmes:
► Over R800bn has been budgeted as rolling investment every three years:
direct employment; crowd in private sector; advance supplier industries and
there are opportunities in sub-Saharan Africa for a few decades to come
Starting point: growth storyline
8
❷ Aggregate demand and shared growth:
► Growth (SA and SSA) generates virtuous cycle, with profound opportunities for
manufacturing, including current imports and other IPAP sectors; as well as
measures such as SME facilitation, rural development and skills training
IDENTIFYING INTERVENTIONS
► Super-cycle anchored in demand from global growth regions; opportunities
for PGM and fuel cell technology – creating possibilities for mature industrial
cluster
❸ Mining as catalyst for new industrialisation drive:
► Balance cost and opportunity: forward and backward linkages and job
opportunities depending on R&D, regulations, procurement and feed-in tariffs
❹ Opportunities in the Green Economy
9
Besides matters to do with the role of the state in the
economy and the quality of the bureaucracy, the
logic of developmental state model also suggests...
► Emphasis on economic growth: focus on employment and self-
employment and in earlier phases large-scale absorption of low- and
semi-skilled workers often at expense of labour standards
► Trickle-down from high growth: reliance on economic rising tide
with little or no social security
► Land as cushion for the poor: tenure system and history of small-
scale agriculture renders land a critical cushion for poor rural
communities
Utility of developmental state model?
IDENTIFYING INTERVENTIONS
Much easier to implement in societies with high
levels of social cohesion and low levels of inequality,
and a commitment to sharing benefits and sacrifices
10
Utility of developmental state model?
IDENTIFYING INTERVENTIONS
◙ Political transition informed by
sufficient consensus which
can lay the basis for an
„economic miracle‟
◙ Formation of the NPC and
policy a priori to build a
developmental state
◙ Relatively developed „social
wage‟ system including social
grants
◙ Natural endowments and
areas of excellence can
catalyse industrialisation
◙ Growth prospects in the
neighbourhood (SSA) are
changing for the better
◙ Inequality, poor social
cohesion and leadership deficit
undermine strategic orientation
and discourse
◙ Economic path dependency
entrenches inequality even
during high growth periods
◙ Dispossession (combined with
mechanisation, pre-emptive
action and poor programmes)
undermines possibility to use
land as a cushion; and
entrepreneurship undermined
◙ Setting on the journey in
period of global rules that limit
options
SOUTH AFRICA: SOME PROS BUT NEED TO ADDRESS CONS…
Also need urgent action on e.g. youth…
11
► Education and skills development: direct correlation with
household income, initiative to start and sustain a small enterprise,
confidence among young women to pursue economic opportunities
► Wage subsidy: critical to address the school-to-work transition and
incentivise employment of youth at least to gain experience
► Learnerships: as part of skills development, and can be multiplied
many-fold if a deliberate campaign is undertaken (57% transition to
employment)
► Public Works Programme: ensure implementation of Phase II, with
focus on youth and women
► Jobs transition through the state: special dispensation for young
workers in services such as CDW‟s, auxilliary nurses and social
workers
► Entrepreneurship: assist youth and women and improve SA‟s TEA
Index including better creativity with BBBEE and land reform
IDENTIFYING INTERVENTIONS
Relationship: poverty and growth
12
IDENTIFYING INTERVENTIONS
Beyond the assumed impact of growth on poverty, there
is in fact a bidirectional relationship…
Need pro-poor growth and pro-growth poverty reduction
Poverty does negatively impact on growth
A 10% increase in poverty lowers GDFI by 6% and GDP growth rate by 1%: people
trapped by poor access to finance, health, education and technology and mired in
survivalist conflict do not optimally contribute to national economic advancement
On the one hand, need for e.g. sectoral strategies that favour labour-intensive
sectors, without inducing medium-term growth-impeding inefficiencies
On the other hand, the negative impact of some pro-growth actions, e.g. trade
liberalisation can be ameliorated through direct assistance to the poor
Human capital is critical
Especially educational attainment (“the great liberator”) can ignite virtuous cycle; but
need decisively to address quality: the poor experience lower, late and uncertain rates
of return to education (World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies: Poverty Reduction and Growth)
13
SOCIAL CAPITAL Weakest among the poor
Using proxy indicators, social capital seems to be weakest
among the poor:
Race 1996 2009
African 46% 52%
Coloured 34% 41%
Indian 17% 12%
White 13% 15%
◙ On aggregate, according to Census figures, the nuclear household had
declined from 46.3% in 1996 to 41.1% in 2001. More striking from a recent
survey is the proportion of children with absent fathers:
◙ Generally, Africans have a low composite score and belong to social
“networks with meagre resources and little to offer one another”
◙ While participation in community and social organisations (including sport
and religious bodies) is high, it seems this is in decline
Fractured families: A crisis for SA (SAIRR, 2011)
Macrosocial Report, The Presidency, 2005
14
SOCIAL CAPITAL Socio-psychological challenges
Less discussed hindrances to policy implementation and dealing
with poverty are matters to do with social consciousness which
impact on both institutional capacity and social solidarity
► The psychology of the more heartless among frontline office workers,
who seem to derive pleasure in making governmental systems complex
and life difficult for citizens
► The impact of power on the psyche: reflected in the arrogance of some
individuals in political leadership who callously pour scorn on the plight of
communities; and the poverty-patronage dynamic (one of MISTRA
research projects)
► The impact of the social system under which we live, which is based on
competitive relations: tendencies such as flaunting of economic status,
kicking of the ladder and climbing on the back of others
► A short-termism that prevents the leadership of various sectors from
identifying common objectives and working together to pursue them
15
SOCIAL CAPITAL Have we learnt from the crisis?
McKinsey counts the cost of the Galleon scandal…
“Mr Barton said there was a wider drop in trust in business since the
global financial crisis, which would require capitalism to adopt a
longer-term perspective, freeing executives from running their
companies merely to hit quarterly earnings targets. McKinsey aims to
change asset managers‟ incentives and methods of measuring
performance to encourage a longer-term approach from investors.”
FT (11/07/2011) quoting Dominic Barton, McKinsey’s Global Managing Director
Experience during global economic crisis (2009)
Germany UK South Africa
% change: GDP -5% -6% -1.8%
% change: employment -4% -2% -6%
Extrapolation from Hilary Joffe, Business Day (20/04/2010)
CONCLUSION Poverty is a common challenge
A unique opportunity
Poverty needs to be addressed in joint action among all social partners.
This is not just about being charitable. It is in the self-interest of all sectors
of society that we succeed in addressing poverty for, combined with
inequality, it is „an equal opportunity disease‟ that affects all, directly and
indirectly.
The greatest opportunity for South Africa currently derives from the efforts to
develop a Vision and National Strategic Plan (not of government but of the
country as a whole) in partnership among all social partners.
Activism among all social sectors is key,
contributing to common vision and ensuring
its implementation: a social compact for high
growth, against poverty and inequality. 16