Additional correspondence received for Item Th15c, Beach …documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2013/5/Th15c-5-2013-a1.pdfThe report’s main is that the area should remain natural, as

kkahnText BoxAdditional correspondence received for Item Th15c, Beach Chalet

kkahnText BoxRepresentative Correspondence from 12 individuals

From: ernst feibuschTo: CoastalBeachChaletAppealCc: [email protected]: beach chalet approval by coastal comissionDate: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 7:16:59 PM

I kicked my first soccer ball as a 12 yr.old @ B'Chalet in 1937. Played andcoached on it after that. Sufferd with the footing by virtueof gopher holes. The fields w ere often closed--by US Army during WWII andpatially during the Korean War; by Rec & Park to "fix" it; by other cityagencies to allow consturctiuon of a sewer line (since removed toFleischackers) for SW Sewer Facilities. I can remember being admonished by a"civilian" on a horse (stables were nearby) as whether " I knew my place." Now when there is still a chance, I would liketo play on it, i.e., soccer, as an88 year old. YES!! The footing of a plostic pitch is excellent. Come on outand see. I'll be happy to have some of my betters interview me as to footing (nopun intended.) My group is playing at CrockerAmazon tonight and next Tuesday 8:00. After that we'll return to South Sunset Plgrd, 8pm.The plastic pitch isthe best thing ever invented whether it annoys the Oligarchs and their minionsor not. .For that matter, why is the meeting being heldin Marin County when thediscussion deals w/ matters of SF. It must be nice to have money and power andhave paid stooges work for me. For more soccer Ernst M. Feibusch, 2821Taraval St. SF 94116, 415 564-3588

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

From: Andrew Solow (Gladding & Michel)To: Kahn, Kevin@Coastal; [email protected]; [email protected]: Lester, Charles@Coastal; Carl, Dan@Coastal; Craig, Susan@CoastalSubject: {Appeal #: A-2-SNF-12-020 // Th15c} - Examiner Editorial: Coastal Commission should allow city"s plan for

soccer fields to proceed_5.2.2013Date: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 1:41:11 AMAttachments: image001.png

Coastal Commission should allow city"s plan for soccer fields to proceed_5.2.2013.pdf

CA Coastal Commission re:Appeal #: A-2-SNF-12-020 // Th15cCalendared for Consideration: May 9, 2013 Honorable Commissioners and Staff, I hereby request that the CA Coastal Commission take formal notice of the attachedSan Francisco Examiner Editorial dated May 2, 2013 - see text of Editorial below. I also request that the CA Coastal Commission take formal notice of the rendering of theBeach Chalet Soccer Fields as designed by the CA Coastal Commission Staff shownbelow.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Coastal Commission should allow city’s plan for soccer fields to proceedBy: SF Examiner Editorial | 05/02/13 10:46 PMSF Examiner Editorial . A recent report by staff members of the state agency that controls development alongCalifornia’s coastline argues against a plan for new playing fields near the Beach Chalet inGolden Gate Park. But the document is flawed in its reasoning and its recommendationsshould be rejected. When the California Coastal Commission takes up the issue of the Beach Chalet soccerfields during its Thursday meeting, the members of the agency will have before them adocument based on a false understanding of what this portion of the park was, is andshould be. The 9.4-acre playing fields sit on the western side of Golden Gate Park, where athleticfields of some sort have existed for more than 75 years. The fields are among the mostused in The City, but poor drainage and wear forces them to be closed roughly half of thetime, according to the Recreation and Park Department. One of the four fields is typicallyclosed at all times to allow the grass to regrow. To extend the playing time at the fields, the parks department has entered into a public-private funding proposal with the City Fields Foundation that would pay to replace thegrass with artificial turf. The site would also receive new lights to illuminate the fields formore hours, a new children’s playground, new seating and revamped restrooms. Theseimprovements would add more than 9,500 hours of playing time at the fields, which aremuch needed in a city where field space and time are both at a premium. The plan has been approved locally, but an appeal to the Coastal Commission prompted

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

Coastal Commission should allow city’s plan for soccer fields to proceed | Examiner Editorial | Editorials | San Francisco Examiner

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed[5/8/2013 1:01:41 AM]

Tweet 3 0 3 Print Comments

RELATED...

EDITORIALS

Coastal Commission should allow city’s plan for soccer fieldsto proceedBy: SF Examiner Editorial | 05/02/13 10:46 PM

SF Examiner Editorial

A recent report by staff members of the state agency that controls development along California’scoastline argues against a plan for new playing fields near the Beach Chalet in Golden Gate Park.But the document is flawed in its reasoning and its recommendations should be rejected.

When the California Coastal Commission takes up the issue of the Beach Chalet soccer fieldsduring its Thursday meeting, the members of the agency will have before them a document basedon a false understanding of what this portion of the park was, is and should be.

The 9.4-acre playing fields sit on the western side of Golden Gate Park, where athletic fields ofsome sort have existed for more than 75 years. The fields are among the most used in The City,but poor drainage and wear forces them to be closed roughly half of the time, according to theRecreation and Park Department. One of the four fields is typically closed at all times to allow thegrass to regrow.

To extend the playing time at the fields, the parks department has entered into a public-privatefunding proposal with the City Fields Foundation that would pay to replace the grass withartificial turf. The site would also receive new lights to illuminate the fields for more hours, a newchildren’s playground, new seating and revamped restrooms. These improvements would addmore than 9,500 hours of playing time at the fields, which are much needed in a city where fieldspace and time are both at a premium.

The plan has been approved locally, but an appeal to the CoastalCommission prompted the report. In that document, agency staffmembers erroneously refer to the existing fields as “pastorallandscape,” arguing that features of the playing field, includingthe lines that mark the athletic fields, could be harmful towildlife.

Opponents of this plan and now the Coastal Commission’s staffmake it appear as though the Recreation and Park Department isclear-cutting virgin forest in an isolated area to make way for amega development. The truth is that the site, which comprisesless than 1 percent of the total space in Golden Gate Park, isalready a playing field with marked lines. The arguments againstlighting range from the light pollution it could cause to theimpacts the lights would have on migrating birds. The reporteven objects to the sideline seating from which parents would beable to watch their children play sports. Oh, yes, and the new

MOST POPULAR

Previous Article

Beach Chalet soccerfield plan panned bystate agency05/01/13 7:28 PM

The long-awaited and much-debated plan to change the

May 8: Born Ruffians rock Slim's and other SanFrancisco events

San Mateo County mail theft suspect assuresauthorities he was not involved in Bostonbombings

Slain man’s kin making new appeal forwitnesses

Stick with your meds schedule

Sen. Leland Yee wants to ban 3-D guns

Like21

VIEWED

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

NEWS POLITICS LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT OPINION SPORTS BLOGS INSIDERS CLASSIFIEDS HOMES JOBS

http://www.facebook.com/sfexaminer

http://www.sfexaminer.com/twitter

http://www.sfexaminer.com/rss-feeds-directory

https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed&related=sfexaminer%3ASan%20Francisco%20Examiner&text=Coastal%20Commission%20should%20allow%20city%E2%80%99s%20plan%20for%20soccer%20fields%20to%20proceed%20%7C%20Examiner%20Editorial%20%7C%20Editorials%20%7C%20San%20Francisco%20Examiner&tw_p=tweetbutton&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed&via=sfexaminer



http://twitter.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed

javascript:;

javascript:;

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials

http://www.sfexaminer.com/people/examiner-editorial

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/05/sf-housing-authority-s-woes-go-beyond-ousted-director?category=1529

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/development/2013/05/beach-chalet-soccer-field-plan-panned-state-agency




http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/good-day/2013/05/may-8-born-ruffians-rock-slims-and-other-san-francisco-events

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/good-day/2013/05/may-8-born-ruffians-rock-slims-and-other-san-francisco-events

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/crime/2013/05/san-mateo-county-mail-theft-suspect-assures-authorities-he-was-not-involved-bost



http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/crime/2013/05/slain-man-s-kin-making-new-appeal-witnesses

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/crime/2013/05/slain-man-s-kin-making-new-appeal-witnesses

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/stick-your-meds-schedule

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/crime/2013/05/sen-leland-yee-wants-ban-3-d-guns

http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=CVhuWWQWKUajZNKiPlAL024C4DbjZscQDAAAQASDQsZQcUPqciLP9_____wFgyfb4hsijoBnIAQLgAgCoAwHIA50EqgThAU_Q8VcEJTVUTemRhtWzPpdsMKJvtGdzKYzcNDYVlFv-Z2uEiQEzEJjImzImqbd0iCf9LKxcxGK_11AEyOXX5ieqyVGUZmHcQ9LAolLtB2044xTObwfbQlFbiWOzqo8RZvtXj6WCZ8M49ZyfQWuXFA4vYQSuEyVHeHu1M5O52QJ0z3F6IaIkzVY6_VaXDo9rmLZj0pGSppivHmwjI8LM057iPgMiVK9ytJeIjVekcqCGhinc_c9F5UCdXFzIwjPpA4T9qrmeHyRBYwOg8h4OJa5BfvOWDffZe-Qne3Jl3m6IUuAEAaAGFA&num=0&sig=AOD64_1CiCHwMnCUYgTK9Pn40gVQuvDk9w&client=ca-pub-2420773643201651&adurl=http://tickets.smuinballet.org/TheatreManager/1/login%26event%3D212&nm=3

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed?quicktabs_1=0#quicktabs-1

http://www.sfexaminer.com/

http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=L&ai=CbzteWQWKUaHZNKiPlAL024C4DeC9tPUCAAAQASDQsZQcUOTA7LUBYMn2-IbIo6AZyAEC4AIAqAMByAOdBKoE4AFP0JLU5ElBF9JeBMy8CDPbeCWbs6AuCcWp6g5yVWO_Z_B4Ibr0nshw_8LeawFYPWUzR99qW7mBTx6k6PDJ563rCU_dPFkV4lMtHTbQCSRJNGF5kF9BTxH4iJL-AYhXVpNCtGHFg6zVi5O2bv6X_WZCO1EOT4Oo5HLPa5rpc_fN3mrKGX5WctiNeyDsLLtCf61In1PngLGjvG9v9sneYbE4aaaTYkgTagW060nbPyiXUkWRf3mu-xzz83hkqi5XhNDZZIbuOrhjQkhJjdt2jIDivOdD2NcO50NAKMnNN8BKSuAEAaAGFA&num=0&sig=AOD64_2OJDcRsKB2SyOEWTT6gL5Uow94BQ&client=ca-pub-2420773643201651&adurl=http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/04/san-francisco-examiner-launches-green-team

http://www.sfexaminer.com/news

http://www.sfexaminer.com/news

http://www.sfexaminer.com/politics

http://www.sfexaminer.com/politics

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local

http://www.sfexaminer.com/entertainment

http://www.sfexaminer.com/entertainment

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion

http://www.sfexaminer.com/sports

http://www.sfexaminer.com/sports

http://www.sfexaminer.com/blogs

http://www.sfexaminer.com/blogs

http://www.sfexaminer.com/community

http://www.sfexaminer.com/community

http://sfexaminer.kaango.com/

http://sfexaminer.kaango.com/

http://realestate.sfexaminer.com/

http://realestate.sfexaminer.com/

http://sfexaminer.monster.com/

http://sfexaminer.monster.com/


http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed[5/8/2013 1:01:41 AM]

Tweet 3 0 3 Print Comments

MORE BY EXAMINER EDITORIAL

Turf plan would blight GG Park’s green oasis

Beach Chalet soccer field plan panned by stateagency

Board rejects appeal of Beach Chalet soccerfields

Soccer, conservation fans battle it out withhome turf in balance

Turf plan criticism is misinformed

RELATED ARTICLES

soccer fields are too rectangular!

The report’s main is that the area should remain natural, as iscalled for in a Golden Gate Park master plan. But, of course, atruly natural Golden Gate Park would consist of the sand dunesthat used to dominate the area before the park was created.Others argue that the area should consist of trees and walkingpaths. However the Coastal Commission staff argues that nineacres of mowed grass — but not artificial turf — would be

natural.

This paper has argued before that if there were not already playing fields at this location, thisproject would be an inappropriate one. But given the history of the past 75 years, this projectwisely upgrades the existing use to make it more usable for the children and adults who needmore space for sports in The City. The remaining 99 percent of Golden Gate Park is there foreverything else.

MORE ON THESE TOPICS: Beach Chalet soccer fields California Coastal Commission golden gate parkocean beach San Francisco Recreation and Park Department

Advertisement

From around the Web ADVERTISEMENT

Pastor says heturned his father's$40,000 retirementinto $396,000 byflipping this 'Obamablunder'

The smartestinvestment you canmake during therecession. Top CDaccounts in thenation...

The FDA hasapproved a solutionfor snoring & sleepapnea that does notrequire acumbersomeCPAP.

Homeowners inCalifornia may beeligible for2.25%(2.77% APR)refinance rate formost credit types

6 comments

Leave a message...

Newest Community My Disqus 2 # ⤤Share

0⤤

shabby grass of the BeachChalet soccer fields intoartificial turf could be derailedby a state agency that overseesdevelopment along thecoastline. Read More

GET DIGITAL EDITION EXAMINER CONNECT

Like21

More

Coastal Commission should allow city’s plan for soccerfields to proceed

Lobbying reform proposal would be good for SanFrancisco

Lawmakers could use a stiff drink

San Francisco right to take Nevada ‘patient dumping’allegations seriously

CleanPowerSF must ensure tangible reductions in fossilfuel usage




http://twitter.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed

javascript:;

javascript:;

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/turf-plan-would-blight-gg-park-s-green-oasis



http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/07/board-rejects-appeal-beach-chalet-soccer-fields

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/07/board-rejects-appeal-beach-chalet-soccer-fields

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/05/soccer-conservation-fans-battle-it-out-home-turf-balance

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/05/soccer-conservation-fans-battle-it-out-home-turf-balance

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/letters-editor/2013/05/turf-plan-criticism-misinformed

http://www.sfexaminer.com/topics/beach-chalet-soccer-fields

http://www.sfexaminer.com/topics/california-coastal-commission

http://www.sfexaminer.com/taxonomy/term/2447



http://web.adblade.com/clicks.php?appId=4131&zid=517831d09347e&adId=56092&pos=1&impt=1367999836.119838859955&zoneId=517&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed







http://web.adblade.com/clicks.php?appId=4131&zid=5047aec671c4f&adId=44049&pos=2&impt=1367999836.119838859955&zoneId=517&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed







http://www.smarterlifestyles.com/2011/05/27/how-you-can-get-a-good-night%E2%80%99s-sleep-2/?fc_id=51826&fc_app_id=4131&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed








http://web.adblade.com/clicks.php?appId=4131&zid=50e5ef78cfc52&adId=50625&pos=4&impt=1367999836.119838859955&zoneId=517&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed








http://www.facebook.com/sfexaminer

http://www.sfexaminer.com/twitter

http://www.sfexaminer.com/rss-feeds-directory

http://www.sfexaminer.com/user/227/227?field_author_value=

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/04/lobbying-reform-proposal-would-be-good-san-francisco

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/04/lobbying-reform-proposal-would-be-good-san-francisco

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/04/lawmakers-could-use-stiff-drink

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/04/san-francisco-right-take-nevada-patient-dumping-allegations-seriously

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/04/san-francisco-right-take-nevada-patient-dumping-allegations-seriously

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/04/cleanpowersf-must-ensure-tangible-reductions-fossil-fuel-usage

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/2013/04/cleanpowersf-must-ensure-tangible-reductions-fossil-fuel-usage

http://info.criteo.com/psu/privacy/informations?infonorm=2&partner=3582&campaignid=28449&zoneid=17537&bannerid=1301578&displayid=4fa4a64317

sfexaminer.com


9jY2VyLWZpZWxkcy1wcm9jZWVkAA==:

ccoptin:

ea: Get Digital Edition

go:

ea_(1): Get Digital Edition

go_(1):

ea_(1)_(2): Get Digital Edition

go_(1)_(2):

NlP0Fjcm9iYXRXZWJDYXBUSUQxMAA=:

form0:

button0:

9jY2VyLWZpZWxkcy1wcm9jZWVkAA==:

form0:

search_theme_form: Search...

op:

xzZT9BY3JvYmF0V2ViQ2FwVElEMTMA:

form0:

fb_dtsg: AQCTi5De

href: http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed

action: like

nobootload:

iframe_referer: http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?api_key=112980478793689&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D24%23cb%3Df2f544d768f789c%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.sfexaminer.com%252Ff31ebd47b8acc48%26domain%3Dwww.sfexaminer.com%26relation%3Dparent.parent&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed&node_type=link&width=100&layout=button_count&colorscheme=light&show_faces=false&send=false&extended_social_context=false

ref:

button0:

fb_dtsg_(1): AQCTi5De

href_(1): http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed

action_(1): like

nobootload_(1):

iframe_referer_(1): http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?api_key=112980478793689&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D24%23cb%3Df2f544d768f789c%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.sfexaminer.com%252Ff31ebd47b8acc48%26domain%3Dwww.sfexaminer.com%26relation%3Dparent.parent&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sfexaminer.com%2Fopinion%2Fop-eds%2F2013%2F05%2Fcoastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed&node_type=link&width=100&layout=button_count&colorscheme=light&show_faces=false&send=false&extended_social_context=false

ref_(1):

the report. In that document, agency staff members erroneously refer to the existing fieldsas “pastoral landscape,” arguing that features of the playing field, including the lines thatmark the athletic fields, could be harmful to wildlife. Opponents of this plan and now the Coastal Commission’s staff make it appear as thoughthe Recreation and Park Department is clear-cutting virgin forest in an isolated area tomake way for a mega development. The truth is that the site, which comprises less than 1percent of the total space in Golden Gate Park, is already a playing field with markedlines. The arguments against lighting range from the light pollution it could cause to theimpacts the lights would have on migrating birds. The report even objects to the sidelineseating from which parents would be able to watch their children play sports. Oh, yes, andthe new soccer fields are too rectangular! The report’s main is that the area should remain natural, as is called for in a Golden GatePark master plan. But, of course, a truly natural Golden Gate Park would consist of thesand dunes that used to dominate the area before the park was created. Others argue thatthe area should consist of trees and walking paths. However the Coastal Commission staffargues that nine acres of mowed grass — but not artificial turf — would be natural. This paper has argued before that if there were not already playing fields at this location,this project would be an inappropriate one. But given the history of the past 75 years, thisproject wisely upgrades the existing use to make it more usable for the children and adultswho need more space for sports in The City. The remaining 99 percent of Golden GatePark is there for everything else. Read more at the San Francisco Examiner: http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed#ixzz2SgfaG869

Beach Chalet Soccer Fieldsas designed by the CA Coastal Commission Staff sfpix.com

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed%23ixzz2SgfaG869http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed%23ixzz2SgfaG869http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2013/05/coastal-commission-should-allow-city-s-plan-soccer-fields-proceed%23ixzz2SgfaG869

sfpix.com Andrew SolowPast President and Co-FounderMission Youth Soccer League (MYSL)San Francisco, CA 94131Cell 415-722-3047

Hon. Mary Shallenberger, Chair

California Coastal Commission

45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, CA 94105-2219

May 7, 2013

Subject: Beach Chalet Athletic Fields, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA

Staff has been copied on this letter

Dear Ms. Shallenberger,

Please uphold the recommendations of the Coastal Commission staff report which finds the current

proposed project to renovate the Beach Chalet Athletic Fields in Golden Gate Park in violation of the

goals of the California Coastal Commission. The project is also inconsistent with the 1998 Golden

Gate Master Plan, The 2004 National Register Listing, The City of San Francisco’s Coastal Plan and

The 2012 Ocean Beach Master Plan.

You will hear a lot of arguments on May 9th why the proposed project is flawed. A lot of Bay Area

projects may look like a good idea at first: The Embarcadero Freeway, which was later torn down;

Filling the SF Bay was once considered a good idea; Even a proposal to develop the Marin Headlands

with housing for 30,000 people was planned, but was thankfully stopped and instead is now open

space.

It can take a decade or more for government bodies to acknowledge that certain kinds of development

are inappropriate in certain areas. Reversing projects that have already been implemented is very

costly.

The paving over of 7 acres of Golden Gate Park right where it interfaces with the Ocean with toxic

tires, plastic grass and 150,000 watts of lights constitutes inappropriate development in a very special

place. It is an open space resource that should be protected for present and future generations by you,

our Coastal Commission Supervisors. You have that power on May 9, 2013. Please support the find-

ings of your own staff!

Sincerely,

Beth Lewis

Beth Lewis571 25th AvenueSan Francisco, CA 94121

From: Abela CarlosTo: Kahn, Kevin@CoastalSubject: Beach Chalet Athletic Fields, Golden Gate Park, San FranciscoDate: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 3:05:20 PM

May 6, 2013 Hon. Mary Shallenberger, ChairCalifornia Coastal Commission45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000San Francisco, CA 94105-2219 Subject: Beach Chalet Athletic Fields, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA May 9th, 2013 CCC HeariingAgenda Item 15 c. Appeal No. A-2-SNF-12-020


I am very much opposed to the proposed soccer field development in Golden Gate Park. The tall lighting will ruin the natural and wild nature of Golden Gate Park and also the ruin the coastline. Golden Gate Park was built to bring some wilderness into our city, and this project will take that away. Paving over more of the park is also an anathema to the purpose of the park. I am also an avid soccer player and I do not think that putting down astro turf on the field will be of any benefit. If the City of SF only spent a little time maintaining the existing field they could easily eliminate the problem of gopher holes. Our California coastline is slowly being destroyed with developments such as this proposal and I urge you to help prevent the City from destroying our historic and wonderful Golden Gate Park. Sincerely, Carlos Abela1266 40th AvenueSan Francisco, CA 94122 cc: Kevin Kahn, Coastal Planner, North Central Coast District [email protected]


From: James ForcierTo: Kahn, Kevin@CoastalSubject: Beach Chalet Athletic Fields, Golden Gate Park, San FranciscoDate: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 5:46:58 PM

Hon. Mary Shallenberger, ChairCalifornia Coastal Commission45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000San Francisco, CA 94105-2219

May 7, 2013


I’m writing to ask that you accept the recommendations in the Coastal Commissionstaff report which finds the proposed project to renovate the Beach Chalet AthleticFields in Golden Gate Park to be in violation of the goals of the California CoastalCommission. The project is also inconsistent with the 1998 Golden Gate Master Plan,the 2004 National Register Listing, the City of San Francisco’s Coastal Plan and the2012 Ocean Beach Master Plan.

In particular, paving over 7 acres of Golden Gate Park using plastic grass andmaterial created from automobile tires, and illuminating the area with150,000 watts oflight, is inappropriate in this park setting. This part of the park where it meets thePacific Ocean should be maintained as open space. Please support the staff’sfindings.

Sincerely,

James Forcier2953 Broderick StreetSan Francisco, CA 94123h

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

From: SF PlayfieldsTo: Kahn, Kevin@Coastal; [email protected]; [email protected]: re: Appeal Number: A-2-SNF-12-020 / Beach Chalet athletic fieldsDate: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 5:52:41 PM

Because this letter is being submitted after 4:00 Monday, May 6th,I will submit copies to the Commissioners and to the record at the hearing on5/9/2013

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION CENTRAL COAST 5/9/2013

AND NORTH CENTRAL COAST DISTRICT OFFICES Th15c,

Appeal Number: A-2-SNF-12-020 / Beach Chalet athletic fields, Golden GatePark

Submitted by Kelley Watts, @SHPFC, on 5/9/2013

re; the proposed project’s SBR crumb infill material

The project’s SBR crumb infill contains carcinogenic toxins. Herein I willaddress only one, carbon black.

1) SBR crumb contains carbon black as its principal ingredient, (at least20%).

2) Carbon black was added to the World Health Organization, theInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, (IARC), and the CaliforniaOffice of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) lists ofsubstances known to the State to cause cancer. In this form it is found onthe Prop 65 list of materials known to cause cancer.

3) Carbon black is composed of microscopic particles which are not onlysmall enough to be inhaled but small enough to be absorbed through theskin.

4) The quantity of carbon black to be introduced by this project into thecoastal environment by the SBR crumb infill will be in the 100s of tonsspread over 9 acres.

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

5) The infill material will be loose and exposed in the coastal environmentwhere, (and I quote the San Francisco Beach Chalet Environmental ImpactReport), “where wind will easily disperse the particulate matter” - .

Proposition 65 - CRNR Notices

Chemical Listed Effective February 21, 2003

as Known to the State of California to Cause Cancer:Carbon Black (airborne, unbound particles of respirable size)

[02/21/03]

Excerpts from the San Francisco Beach Chalet Draft Environmental ImpactReport (DEIR)

(DEIR page IV.H-2);

“The SBR material also contains carbon black, an industrial chemical used inthe manufacturing of automobile tires and other plastic materials.”

(DEIR page IV.H-2);

“It, (carbon black), is composed of nanoparticles that are much smaller thanPM10 and PM2.5 (nanoparticles vary in size from 1 to 100 nanometers, with abillion nanometers forming a meter).”

(DEIR page IV.H-3);

“Fine particulates small enough to be inhaled into the deepest parts of thehuman lung can cause adverse health effects, and studies have shown thatelevated particulate levels contribute to the death of approximately 200 to 500people per year in the Bay Area. High levels of particulates have also beenknown to exacerbate chronic respiratory ailments, such as bronchitis andasthma, and have been associated with increased emergency room visits andhospital admissions.”

(DEIR page IV.H-3);

“wind will easily disperse the particulate matter”

From: Deborah Howard-PageTo: Kahn, Kevin@CoastalSubject: No Astroturf in park land-- think of the wildlife!Date: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 10:15:23 PM

I urge the Coastal Commission to consider any and all alternativeoptions, such as repairing other soccer fields close by.Please consider the flora and fauna. Thank you!

Sincerely,

Deborah Howard-Page547 Arkansas St.S.F., CA 94107


Memo to: Coastal Commissioners From: Isabel Wade, Ph.D. Founder, San Francisco Neighborhood Parks Council Re: Beach Chalet Date: May 5, 2013 Unfortunately I will be out of town when the hearing on San Francisco’s Beach Chalet is held next week. I am writing to urge you to respect the work of your staff and the concerns of many thousands of San Francisco residents (including myself) about the inappropriate project proposed for the Beach Chalet. As the founder of the Neighborhood Parks Council, a 501©3 organization now merged to form the SF Parks Alliance, I am well aware of the challenge of balancing various recreation needs on very limited land while also maintaining habitat and other values in our park system. I am also not necessarily an opponent of artificial turf in some circumstances. I strongly support expansion of soccer facilities in our city. However, I do not support the proposed project of artificial turf in Golden Gate Park that I believe is in violation of the Master Plan. In addition, the planned lighting for this facility will not only violate the plan’s stated intent for the west end of the park, but also is in violation of federal policies aimed at reducing light impact on the night sky. We have such a unique opportunity for observing the cosmos at night in San Francisco as compared to almost any other major metropolitan area; we should protect and enhance this very important resource for the public and respect the national policy in this regard. The continued insistence by the Recreation and Park Department that the Beach Chalet is the only site in San Francisco for this soccer facility is just not correct. The West Sunset Playground has been identified as another good site, less than a dozen blocks away but in an urban setting more appropriate for the lights. In addition, there is considerable land at Candlestick Point – a new defunct stadium setting with no apparent funding for the planned development. There are undoubtedly others. I urge you to respect your mandate to protect the Coast and reject this project that will harm our coastal resources, the night sky, and the quiet end of Golden Gate park. Thank You.

From: Donald DodgeTo: CoastalBeachChaletAppealSubject: GG park soccer fieldsDate: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 10:26:03 AM

Dear commissioners

I believe that GG Park and GGNRA is not the place for artificial turf and high intensity lighting right nextto the coast.

Thank you

Donald Dodge300 Caselli AveSan Francisco 94114

Sent from my iPhone


From: Rebecca EvansTo: CoastalBeachChaletAppealCc: Rebecca EvansSubject: Support for the staff reportDate: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 9:58:25 PM

Chair Shallenberger: I have read the staff report on the Beach Chalet and find it accurate andintelligent. I hope that the Coastal Commission supports the staff recommendations in their entirety.

You clearly have the impetus and the authority to protect this part of our precious coastal area as SanFrancisco has failed to do.

In the early 1970s I worked for the passage of the Coastal Act. I am pleased that the Commission andits staff are still doing exemplary work.

Rebecca EvansSan Francisco


44 Woodland Ave San Francisco, CA 94117 (415) 566-7050

May 3, 2013 Hon. Mary Shallenberger, Chair California Coastal Commission 45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94105-2219

Kevin Kahn, Coastal Planner North Central Coast District 45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94105-2219

Re: Beach Chalet Athletic Fields, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California Subject: Support Recommendation of California Coastal Commission Staff Report Dear Ms. Shallenberger and Mr. Kahn: Simply put, San Francisco Tomorrow supports the California Coastal Commission staff report recommending rejection of artificial turf and stadium lights at the Beach Chalet Athletic Fields, which adversely impact the naturalistic landscape and open spaces that link the Pacific Ocean, Golden Gate Park, Panhandle and urban greenways and provide important habitat for nesting and migrating birds. As one of San Francisco’s oldest environmental organizations, we have steadfastly advocated for open space, recreational areas, environmental responsibility, environmental justice and San Francisco’s unique qualities. Like our battles against freeway construction and waterfront development, San Francisco Tomorrow has fought for better environmental alternatives, which have ultimately proved beneficial for future generations. At any given moment in time, financial and short-term expediency may blind ones vision for the long-term. The California Coastal Commission was created to guide our coastal destiny, independent of local politics and financial intrigue. We urge you to guide the City towards better alternatives, such as: • The Hybrid Alternative that moves artificial turf to the West Sunset Playground, while

renovating the Beach Chalet soccer fields with real grass, drainage/ field improvements and minimal lights;

• Renovating the Beach Chalet fields with real grass and use remaining funds to upgrade play fields throughout San Francisco;

• Evaluating new development sites, which may enable larger and more cost-efficient fields, such as at Treasure Island, Mission Bay and Hunters Point, in addition to neighborhood parks;

• Better distribution of fields to meet the requirements of disadvantaged communities, rather than a fiscal emphasis on league teams from outside San Francisco.

44 Woodland Ave San Francisco, CA 94117 (415) 566-7050

Fundamentally, in line with the Local Coastal Program, the Golden Gate Park Master Plan and the Ocean Beach Master Plan, we see the greatest public good in preserving the western end of Golden Gate Park in its historic form as a low-impact open space that provides respite for visitors and shelter for species to replace lost habitat. The environmental continuity, from ocean to park to streetscapes, is an environmental pathway too important to lose. Especially with viable alternatives that serve the programmatic needs of even more San Franciscans, we urge the rejection of artificial turf and stadium lights at the Beach Chalet Athletic Fields. Sincerely,

Jennifer Clary, President 44 Woodland Avenue, SF, CA 94117 cc: SF Ocean Edge 1243 42nd Avenue San Francisco, Ca 94122

From: Celia TaupinTo: Kahn, Kevin@CoastalSubject: BEACH CHALET ATHLETIC FIELDSDate: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 12:37:25 PM

Hon. Mary Shallenberger, ChairCalifornia Coastal Commission45 Fremont Street, Suite 2000San Francisco, CA 94105-2219

May 7, 2013

Subject: Beach Chalet Athletic Fields, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA


Please uphold the recommendations of the Coastal Commission staff report which finds the current proposed project to renovate the Beach Chalet Athletic Fields in Golden Gate Park in violation of the goals of the California Coastal Commission. The project is also inconsistent with the 1998 Golden Gate Master Plan, The 2004 National Register Listing, The City of San Francisco’s Coastal Plan and The 2012 Ocean Beach Master Plan.

The paving over of 7 acres of Golden Gate Park right where it interfaces with the Ocean with toxic tires, plastic grass and 150,000 watts of lights constitutes inappropriate development in a very special place. It is an open space resource that should be protected for present and future generations by you, our Coastal Commission officials. You have that power on May 9, 2013. Please support the findings of your own staff!

Sincerely,

Celia Thompson Taupin3435 Cesar Chavez, Studio 320San Francisco,CA 94110


From: Sierra Club on behalf of Jessica Dervin-AckermanTo: CoastalBeachChaletAppealSubject: Renovate the Beach Chalet fields with natural grass and minimal or no lightingDate: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 1:08:28 PM

May 7, 2013

Honorable Mary ShallenbergerCA

Dear Honorable Shallenberger,

RE: May 9th, 2013 CCC Hearing and Agenda Item 15 c. Appeal No.A-2-SNF-12-020

I support the Staff Report, and I encourage you to do so also.

Renovating the Beach Chalet fields with natural grass and minimal or nolighting is a practical solution to the needs for a playing fieldwithin Golden Gate Park and the Coastal Zone.

However, the Beach Chalet project as proposed would not only destroythe naturalistic character of the western end of Golden Gate Park, butit would also directly destroy over 7 acres of habitat and have anegative impact on habitat for a much wider area. The proposedartificial turf soccer complex limits use by the general public of apublic area that should be open to everyone for multi-use. The 150,000watts of stadium lights on 60 foot poles would light up the westernedge of the Park and the beach, impacting the enjoyment of this area,which is now used by families for enjoying the sunset, strolling alongthe Promenade at dusk, sitting by a fire ring or learning aboutastronomy through star-gazing.

The Staff Report addresses all of those issues in a practical, feasiblemanner, and I recommend that you adopt it.

I also encourage you to look at alternatives, in particular theproposed Hybrid Alternative. This alternative will provide hours ofplay for our children while protecting the habitat and naturalisticcharacter of Golden Gate Park and the beauty of Ocean Beach.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Ms. Jessica Dervin-Ackerman548 43rd St Apt AOakland, CA 94609-2072

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] BoxRepresentative correspondence from 823 individuals

NSI [email protected][email protected]_20130508_160307

SI Post DD.pdfSI [email protected][email protected]_20130508_160432

Documents

Additional correspondence received for Item Th15c, Beach …documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2013/5/Th15c-5-2013-a1.pdfThe report’s main is that the area should remain natural, as