4
8/21/2019 Additional Cases for Conspiracy http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/additional-cases-for-conspiracy 1/4 ADDITIONAL READING FOR CONSPIRACY PEOPLE vs. MARLON DELIM, ET. AL., ([G.R. No. 142773. Ja!a"# 2$, 2%%3& ' )*a+o"s o *os-"a*#  CIRCMSTANCES JSTIFYING OR E/EMPTING FROM CRIMINAL LIA0ILITY  SIFTING OF TE 0RDEN OF PROOF (onus probandi )  1. Ladiana vs. People, 393 SCRA 419  2. People vs. Ulep, GR 132547, September 20, 2000] 3. ANGCACO vs. PEOPLE (378 SCRA 297) 4. PEOPLE vs. PEDRO MONDIJAR (392 SCRA 356, GR 141914, November 21, 2002) JSTIFYING CIRCMSTANCES (ARTC!" 11)  SELFDEFENSE  (#$r$%r$p& 1) 1. R"'ST"S (RP) People vs. Bonnie Rabanal, 387 SCRA 685, GR 146687, A*%*+t 22, 2002) 2. Ms+a o Fa*+ US vs. Ah Chong  (15 #&- 488),  DEFENSE OF PROPERTY 1. self-help - Art-/e+ 429, 536 539 o t&e C-v- Coe 2. People vs. Narvaez ( GRN !33466 Apr- 20, 1983), 3. self-help - Art-/e+ 429, 536 539 o t&e C-v- Coe  

Additional Cases for Conspiracy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Additional Cases for Conspiracy

8/21/2019 Additional Cases for Conspiracy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/additional-cases-for-conspiracy 1/4

ADDITIONAL READING FOR CONSPIRACY

PEOPLE vs. MARLON DELIM, ET. AL., ([G.R. No. 142773. Ja!a"# 2$, 2%%3& ' )*a+o"so *os-"a*# 

CIRCMSTANCES JSTIFYING OR

E/EMPTING FROM CRIMINAL LIA0ILITY

 

SIFTING OF TE 0RDEN OF PROOF (onus probandi )

 

1.  Ladiana vs. People, 393 SCRA 419

 

2.  People vs. Ulep, GR 132547, September 20, 2000]

3. 

ANGCACO vs. PEOPLE (378 SCRA 297)

4. 

PEOPLE vs. PEDRO MONDIJAR (392 SCRA 356, GR 141914, November 21, 2002)

JSTIFYING CIRCMSTANCES

(ARTC!" 11)

 

SELFDEFENSE  (#$r$%r$p& 1)

1.  R"'ST"S (RP) People vs. Bonnie Rabanal, 387 SCRA 685, GR 146687, A*%*+t 22, 2002)

2.  Ms+a o Fa*+ US vs. Ah Chong  (15 #&- 488),

 

DEFENSE OF PROPERTY

1.  self-help - Art-/e+ 429, 536 539 o t&e C-v- Coe

2.  People vs. Narvaez ( GRN !33466 Apr- 20, 1983),

3.  self-help - Art-/e+ 429, 536 539 o t&e C-v- Coe

 

Page 2: Additional Cases for Conspiracy

8/21/2019 Additional Cases for Conspiracy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/additional-cases-for-conspiracy 2/4

4. 

ee+e o propert m$ $+o be -voe b oe &o -+ mere eer/-+-% $ r-%&t, *er Art-/e 11, p$r$%r$p& 5.

 

N!A:! AGGR"SS;N

1.  Concept & definition < +5" a*+!a6 o" +.

2.  $* $%%re++-o -+ $ *o)+o s 8!a o o" s6 )s, 95+5" *o-6+ o" *o-6+

3.  Unlawful Aggression is a primordial element  <(People vs. Bonnie Rabanal , 387 SCRA 685, GR 146687, A*%*+t 22,2002). en te unlawful aggression as ceased to e!ist, te one ma"ing te defense as no rigt to "ill or in#ure te former aggressor 

 

4. 

T5 )a:" !s+ ; a*+!a6 o" + . People vs. Cabungcal ,=1]> People vs. De la Cruz ,=2]

5. 

Na+!" o A::"sso  < (People vs. Bonnie Rabanal , +*pr$). People vs. Sabio,=3]

6. 

No *$* $%%re++-o - t&e oo-%

7.  PATROLMAN ALMEDA vs. CORT OF APPEALS  (GR No. 120853, ?$r/& 13, 1997)

 

 AGGR"SS;N ?ST @" ??"AT" ;R ??N"NT <

1.  (People vs. Bonnie R. Rabanal , GR 146687, 2002 A*%*+t 22). $en te treat coming from te aggressor as beenneutrali%ed, te one defending as no rigt to "ill or in#ure

 

2.  Baered !o"an S#ndro"e, Se/t-o 26 RA 9262

 

REASONA0LENESS OF TE MEANS TO REPEL TE AGGRESSION

1.  People vs. Bonnie Rabanal , 387 SCRA 685, GR 146687, 2002 A*%*+t 22) umber of gunsot wounds ma' indicate

weter te means are reasonable to repel te aggression

2. 

T&e $ oe+ ot re*-re peror/e e*$-t b*t o r$t-o$ e*-v$e/e.

 

LAC< OF SFFICIENT PRO=OCATION

1.  US vs. $ose %aurel  (22 #&- 252),

Page 3: Additional Cases for Conspiracy

8/21/2019 Additional Cases for Conspiracy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/additional-cases-for-conspiracy 3/4

2.  People vs. Dolfo (CA 46 ;G 1521),

 

INDICATORS Seee+e

1. 

a+!" a) !;" o 9o!)s 6*+) , PEOPLE vs. 0ONNIE RA0ANAL (s!-"a>

2.  F6:5+ "o +5 *" +/ee betr$+ $ %*-t /o+/-e/e $ $$t&em$ to t&e /$-m o +eee+e ( People vs. Atadero,387 SCRA 179).

3.  Fa6!" o o?s -a"+ +o o" +5 -o6* !-o s!"")"  t&$t &e $/te - +eee+e -+ $t$ (People vs. (aure, 379SCRA 128).

 PEOPLE vs. MARIO MARCELO, (G.R. No. 140385. Apr- 14, 2004] RA@ON vs. PEOPLE (G.R. NO. 1$%3, J! 21, 2%%7>

 

DEFENSE OF RELATI=ES (p$r$%r$p& 2, Art 11)

1.  People vs. &oring  (GR 56358, ;/tober 26, 1990, 191 SCRA 47),

 

DEFENSE OF STRANGER (p$r$%r$p& 3, Art 11) <

1. 

US vs. Subing-subing ,=4]

2. 

People vs. 'eli )enura and Arane 'lores*+, 

 

A=OIDANCE OF GREATER E=IL OR INJRY (p$r$%r$p& 4)

1.  A"+*6 432 o +5 Cv6 Co),

Page 4: Additional Cases for Conspiracy

8/21/2019 Additional Cases for Conspiracy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/additional-cases-for-conspiracy 4/4

2. 

PEOPLE vs. NORMA ERNANDE@ (CA 55 ;G 8465)

3.  TY vs. PEOPLE, (G.R. 149275, September 27, 2004, 439 SCRA 220) )f te evil sougt to be

avoided is merel' e!pected or anticipated or ma' appen in te future, tis defense is not applicable

 

FLFILLMENT OF DTY OR PERFORMANCE OF RIGT (p$r 5)<

1.  People vs. rneso Ulep, GR 132547, Sept 2, 2002>

2.  Po"o# vs. People, GR 150647, September 29, 2004 439 SCRA 439)

3. 

Ms+a o Fa*+ People vs. anis,

4. 

A -o6*a a# s5oo+ a 6: *"a6.  Po-6 vs. D6a (46 #&- 738),

5. 

S656- )o*+" a--6*a;6 A"+ 42B *v6 *o)> People vs. Depane (CA 58 ;G 926),

6.  ANGCACO vs. PEOPLE (378 SCRA 297)

 

O0EDIENCE TO A LAFL ORDER (p$r$%r$p& 6, Art 11)

1.  *ollowing an illegal order is not #ustified . People vs. /argen (85 #&- 839)> People vs.Beronilla (96 #&- 566)

 

 AT;NA! CAS"S

1.  #eope v+. ?$r-o ?$r/eo, GR 140385, Apr- 14, 2004

2.  R$Bo v+. #eope, GR 158053, *e 21, 2007

 

#e$+e t$e ote t&$t /$+e+ /-te - o*r boo $re $*tom$t-/$ p$rt o t&e $++-%met